PUBLISHED SCHOLARSHIP AND RECONSTRUCTIONS — METHODS

This module connects bounded original-publication consultation to the existing Archaeology World field atlas. It does not claim a complete literature review. Earlier library records keep their recorded inspection levels; newly curated records do not all imply original-text consultation. Counts describe source records, which may overlap.

Claims retain stable IDs, exact locators, evidence roles and explicit limits. Share the claim link to reopen its dossier. Named restoration proposals and current remains have distinct roles. The evidence-to-model assessment records which details can be considered, which require registration and which remain hypotheses. It does not admit new geometric detail.

Three author-published Jacques Vérité drawings dated 2017 and published in 2019 are retained unmodified under CC BY-SA4.0 with their individual source and licence links. The separate original hall illustration is a Magalia reading after Lézine, with graphic simplifications; it is not a registered model of the maritime frontage. Figures with restricted or unestablished reuse terms remain access records and links; a book catalogue does not supply its figures.

Citation exports preserve supplied chapter authors, editors, locators and consultation notes. Unconsulted books remain bibliography leads. CSL JSON retains full supplied metadata; RIS import heuristics for literal personal names vary across managers. No DOI or page range is inferred from a title.

Improved sequence: choose a bounded question; inspect the original publication; record claims and source dependencies; verify each visual's reuse terms; connect the source reading to the appropriate context and model scope; audit claims, controls, exports and exact output bytes. New geometry requires its own plan/section, datum, rights and registration checks.

PUBLISHED COMPARISONS
Comparisons are editorial groupings of source-qualified arguments. Their roles distinguish disagreement between publications, bounds within one author's proposal, and observed evidence versus restored completion. Figure records remain individually attributed; the absence of an applicable figure is preserved. A comparison does not establish new model-object bindings or make independent frames coincide. The export carries the chosen record, linked claims, figure metadata and supplied citations with consultation limits. Earlier model pages keep the consultation history of their original edition.