<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader xml:lang="eng">
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>The Roman History: The Civil Wars</title>
<author>Appian of Alexandria</author>
<editor role="translator">Horace White</editor>
<sponsor>Perseus Project, Tufts University</sponsor>
<principal>Gregory Crane</principal>
<respStmt>
<resp>Prepared under the supervision of</resp>
<name>Lisa Cerrato</name>
<name>Anne Mahoney</name>
<name>David Mimno</name>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<publisher>Trustees of Tufts University</publisher>
<pubPlace>Medford, MA</pubPlace>
<authority>Perseus Project</authority>
<date type="release" when="2003-12-05">Perseus 3.0</date>
<idno type="filename">tlg0551.tlg017.perseus-eng2.xml</idno>   
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<monogr>
<author>Appian of Alexandria</author>
<title>The Roman History of Appian of Alexandria</title>
<title type="sub">The Civil Wars</title>
<editor role="translator">Horace White</editor>
<imprint>
<pubPlace>New York</pubPlace>
<publisher>The Macmillan Company</publisher>
<date>1899</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="volume">2 </biblScope>
</monogr>
<ref target="https://archive.org/details/romanhistorytran02appiuoft/">Internet Archive</ref>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>

<encodingDesc>
<editorialDecl><correction status="medium" method="silent"><p>Perseus OCR</p></correction></editorialDecl>
<refsDecl n="CTS">
<cRefPattern n="section" matchPattern="(\w+)(\w+)(\w+)" replacementPattern="#xpath(/tei:TEI/tei:text/tei:body/tei:div/tei:div[@n='$1']/tei:div[@n='$2']/tei:div[@n='$3'])">
<p>This pointer pattern extracts section.</p>
</cRefPattern>
<cRefPattern n="chapter" matchPattern="(\w+)(\w+)" replacementPattern="#xpath(/tei:TEI/tei:text/tei:body/tei:div/tei:div[@n='$1']/tei:div[@n='$2'])">
<p>This pointer pattern extracts chapter.</p>
</cRefPattern>
<cRefPattern n="book" matchPattern="(\w+)" replacementPattern="#xpath(/tei:TEI/tei:text/tei:body/tei:div/tei:div[@n='$1'])">
<p>This pointer pattern extracts book.</p>
</cRefPattern>
</refsDecl>
</encodingDesc>

<profileDesc>
<langUsage>
<language ident="eng">English</language>
<language ident="lat">Latin</language>
<language ident="grc">Greek</language>
<language ident="deu">German</language>
<language ident="fre">French</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>

<revisionDesc>
 <change when="2025-11-20" who="Lisa Cerrato">header review and regularization; updates to encoding and structure to align with current best practices</change>
	<change when="2016-01-08" who="TDBuck">p4 to p5</change>
	<change when="2009-10-07" who="rsingh04"> began reorganizing texts module by collection. created separate work directory in texts module to keep hopper files separate from in progress files</change>
	<change when="2009-07-07" who="rsingh04">fixed item tag for cvs log keyword</change>
	<change when="2009-07-06" who="student"> edited entity tags CEH</change>
	<change when="2009-05-27" who="RS"/>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
	
<text>
<body>

<div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0551.tlg017.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng">
<div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="book">
<head>THE CIVIL WARS</head>
<!--
<head>THE ROMAN HISTORY OF APPIAN OF ALEXANDRIA</head>
<head><title>TRANSLATED FROM THE GREEK</title> BY HORACE WHITE, M.A., LL.D. <title>WITH MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS</title></head>
<head>THE CIVIL WARS</head>
<head>New Work</head>
-->
<!--
<epigraph><cit><quote><L>Vastness! and Age! and Memories of Eld!
<L>Silence! and Desolation! and dim Night!
<L>I feel ye &emdash; now I feel ye in your strength &emdash;
<L>O spells more sure than e'er Jud&#230;an King 
<L>Taught in the gardens of Gethsemane!
<L>O charms more potent than the rapt Chaldee 
<L>Ever drew down from out the quiet stars.</quote>
<bibl><author>EDGAR A. POE.</author></bibl>
</cit></epigraph>
-->

 <div n="intro" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>INTRODUCTION</head>
<div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>THE plebeians<note resp="translator">
<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ δῆμος.</foreign> The Greek language uses this
word for the whole body of free citizens. In Latin the word <foreign xml:lang="lat">plebs</foreign> was used for the commonalty and <foreign xml:lang="lat">populus</foreign> for the whole body of commonalty and
aristocracy together. In this translation the word <q rend="double">people</q> will be used
in all cases as the equivalent of <foreign xml:lang="grc">δῆμος,</foreign> except where a distinction between <foreign xml:lang="lat">plebs</foreign> and <foreign xml:lang="lat">populus</foreign>
is necessary to a correct understanding of the text.</note> and Senate
of <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> [in the olden time] were
often at strife with each other concerning the enactment of laws, the
cancelling of debts, the division of lands, or the election of magistrates.
Internal discord did not bring them to blows, however; these were
dissensions merely and contests within the law, which they composed by
making mutual concessions, and with much respect for <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 260</note> each other. Once when the
plebeians were going to a war <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0494">494</date></note> they fell into such a
controversy, but they did not use the weapons in their hands, but withdrew
to the hill, which from this time on was called the Sacred Mount.<note resp="translator">Cf. Livy, ii. 33, 34.</note> Even
then no violence was done, but they created a magistrate for their
protection and called him the tribune of the plebs, to serve especially as a
check upon the consuls, who were chosen by the Senate, so that the political
power should not be exclusively in their hands. Whence arose still greater
bitterness, and the magistrates were arrayed in stronger animosity to each
other after this event, and the Senate and plebeians took sides with them,
each believing that it would prevail over the other by augmenting the power
of its own magistrates. In the midst of contests of this kind Marcius
Coriolanus, having been banished contrary <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 262</note> to justice, took refuge with the Volsci and
levied war <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0492">492</date></note> against his country. </p>
</div><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>This is the only case of armed strife that can be found in the ancient
seditions, and this was caused by an exile. The sword was never carried into
the assembly, <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 621</note>
and there was no civil butchery until Tiberius Gracchus, <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0133">133</date></note> while serving as tribune and bringing forward new
laws, was the first to fall a victim to internal commotion; and many others
besides, who were assembled with him at the Capitol, were slain around the
temple. Sedition did not end with this abominable deed. Repeatedly the
parties came into open conflict, often carrying daggers; and occasionally in
the temples, or the assemblies, or the forum, some one serving as tribune,
or praetor, or consul, or a candidate for those offices, or some
person otherwise distinguished, would be slain. Unseemly violence prevailed
almost constantly, together with shameful contempt for law and justice. As
the evil gained in magnitude open insurrections against the government and
large warlike expeditions against the country were undertaken by exiles, or
criminals, or persons contending against each other for some office or
military command. There were chiefs of factions in different places aspiring
to supreme power, some of them refusing to disband the troops intrusted to
them by the people, others levying forces against each other on their own
account, without public authority. Whichever of them first got possession of
the city, the others made war nominally against their adversaries, but
actually against their country. They assailed it like a foreign enemy.
Ruthless and indiscriminate massacres of citizens were perpetrated. Men were
proscribed, others banished, property was confiscated, and some were even
subjected to excruciating tortures. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 672</note>
</p>
</div><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>No unseemly deed was wanting until, about fifty years after the death of
Gracchus, Cornelius Sulla, one of these chiefs of factions, doctoring one
evil with another, made himself the absolute master of the state for an
indefinite period. Such officials were formerly called dictators — an
office created in the most perilous emergencies for six months only, and
long since fallen into disuse. Sulla, although nominally elected, became
dictator for life by force and compulsion. Nevertheless he became satiated
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0082">82</date></note> with power and was the first man, so far as I
know, holding <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 675</note>
supreme power, who had the courage to lay it down voluntarily <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0079">79</date></note> and to declare that he would render an account of his
stewardship to any who were dissatisfied with it. And so, for a considerable
period, he walked to the forum as a private citizen in the sight of all and
returned home unmolested, so great was the awe of his government still
remaining in the minds of the onlookers, or their amazement at his laying it
down. Perhaps they were ashamed to call for an accounting, or entertained
other good feeling toward him, or a belief that his despotism had been
beneficial to the state. Thus there was a cessation of factions for a short
time while Sulla lived, and a compensation for the evils which Sulla had
wrought. </p>
</div><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After his death the troubles broke out afresh and <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 705</note> continued until Gaius
Caesar, who had held the command <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0049">49</date></note> in <placeName key="tgn,1000070">Gaul</placeName> by election for some years, was
ordered by the Senate to lay down his command. He charged that it was not
the wish of the Senate, but of Pompey, his enemy, who had command of an army
in <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName>, and was scheming to
depose him. So he sent a proposal that both should retain their armies, so
that neither need fear the other’s enmity, or that Pompey should dismiss his
forces also and live as a private citizen under the laws in like manner with
him-self. Both requests being refused, he marched from <placeName key="tgn,1000070">Gaul</placeName> against Pompey in the Roman
territory, entered it, put him to flight, pursued him into <placeName key="tgn,7001399">Thessaly</placeName>, won a brilliant <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 706</note> victory over him
in a great battle, and followed him to <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0048">48</date></note>
<placeName key="tgn,7016833">Egypt</placeName>. After Pompey had been slain
by the Egyptians Caesar set to work on the affairs of <placeName key="tgn,7016833">Egypt</placeName> and remained there until he had
settled the dynasty of that country. Then he returned to <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName>. Having overpowered by war his
principal rival, who had been surnamed the Great on account of his brilliant
military exploits, he now ruled without disguise, nobody daring any longer
to dispute him about anything, and was chosen, next after Sulla, dictator
for life. Again all civil dissensions ceased until Brutus and Cassius,
envious of his great power and desiring to restore the government of their
fathers, slew in the Senate this most popular man, who was also the one most
experienced in the art <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R.
710</note> of government. The people mourned for him greatly. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0044">44</date></note> They scoured the city in pursuit of his murderers.
They buried him in the middle of the forum and built a temple on the place
of his funeral pile, and offered sacrifice to him as a god. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 711</note>
</p>
</div><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>And now civil discord broke out again worse than <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0043">43</date></note> ever and
increased enormously. Massacres, banishments, and proscriptions of both
senators and the so-called knights took place straightway, including great
numbers of both classes, the chief of factions surrendering their enemies to
each other, and for this purpose not sparing even their friends and
brothers; so much does animosity toward rivals overpower the love of
kindred. So in the course of events the Roman empire was partitioned, as
though it had been their private property, by these three men: Antony,
Lepidus, and the one who was first called Octavius, but afterward
Caesar from his relationship to the other Caesar and
adoption in his will. Shortly after this division they fell to quarrelling
among themselves, as was natural, and Octavius, <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 718</note> who was the superior in
understanding and skill, first <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0036">36</date></note> deprived Lepidus of <placeName key="tgn,7001242">Africa</placeName>, which had fallen to his lot, and
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 723</note> afterward,
as the result of the battle of <placeName key="perseus,Actium,Acarnania">Actium</placeName>, took from <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0031">31</date></note> Antony all the
provinces lying between <placeName key="tgn,1000140">Syria</placeName> and
the Adriatic gulf. Thereupon, while all the world was filled with
astonishment at these wonderful displays of power, he sailed to <placeName key="tgn,7016833">Egypt</placeName> and took that country, which was the
oldest and at that time the strongest possession of the successors of
Alexander, and the only one wanting to complete the Roman empire as it now
stands. In consequence of these <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 727</note> exploits he was at once elevated to the rank of a deity
while <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0027">27</date></note> still living, and was the first to be thus
distinguished by the Romans, and was called by them Augustus. He assumed to
himself an authority like Caesar’s over the country and the subject
nations, and even greater than Caesar’s, not needing any form of
election, or authorization, or even the pretence of it. His government being
strengthened by time and mastery, and himself successful in all things and
revered by all, he left a lineage and succession that held the supreme power
in like manner after him. </p>
</div><div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus, out of multifarious civil commotions, the Roman state passed into
solidarity and monarchy. To show how these things came about I have written
and compiled piled this narrative, which is well worth the study of those
who wish to know the measureless ambition of men, their dreadful lust of
power, their unwearying perseverance, and the countless forms of evil. It is
especially necessary for me to describe these things beforehand since they
are the preliminaries of my Egyptian history, and end where that begins, for
<placeName key="tgn,7016833">Egypt</placeName> was seized in consequence
of this last civil commotion, Cleopatra having joined forces with Antony. On
account of its magnitude I have divided the work, first taking up the events
that occurred from the time of Sempronius Gracchus to that of Cornelius
Sulla; next, those that followed to the death of Caesar. The
remaining books of the civil wars treat of those waged by the triumvirs
against each other and the Roman people, until the end of these conflicts,
and the greatest achievement, the battle of <placeName key="perseus,Actium,Acarnania">Actium</placeName>, fought by Octavius Caesar against Antony
and Cleopatra together, which will be the beginning of the Egyptian
history.</p>
</div></div>
  <div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER I</head>
<head>The Roman Public Domain — The Licinian Law—The Agrarian Law of Tiberius
Gracchus—Struggle over its Enactment—Public Harangue of Gracchus—The
Tribune Octavius vetoes the Bill—Gracchus deposes him—The Bill
passed</head>
<div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The Romans, as they subdued the Italian nations successively in war, seized a
part of their lands and built towns there, or established their own colonies
in those already existing, and used them in place of garrisons. Of the land
acquired by war they assigned the cultivated part forthwith to settlers, or
leased or sold it. Since they had no leisure as yet to allot the part which
then lay desolated by war (this was generally the greater part), they made
proclamation that in the meantime those who were willing to work it might do
so for a share of the yearly crops a tenth of the grain and a fifth of the
fruit. From those who kept flocks was required a share of the animals, both
oxen and small cattle. They did these things in order to multiply the
Italian race, which they considered the most laborious of peoples, so that
they might have plenty of allies at home. But the very opposite thing
happened; for the rich, getting possession of the greater part of the
undistributed lands, and being emboldened by the lapse of time to believe
that they would never be dispossessed, and adding to their holdings the
small farms of their poor neighbors, partly by purchase and partly by force,
came to cultivate vast tracts instead of single estates, using for this
purpose slaves as laborers and herdsmen, lest free laborers should be drawn
from agriculture into the army. The ownership of slaves itself brought them
great gain from the multitude of their progeny, who increased because they
were exempt from military service. Thus the powerful ones became enormously
rich and the race of slaves multiplied throughout the country, while the
Italian people dwindled in numbers and strength, being oppressed by penury,
taxes, and military service. If they had any respite from these evils they
passed their time in idleness, because the land was held by the rich, who
employed slaves instead of freemen as cultivators. </p>
</div><div n="8" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>For these reasons the people became troubled lest they should no longer have
sufficient allies of the Italian stock, and lest the government itself
should be endangered by such a vast number of slaves. Not perceiving any
remedy, as it was not easy, nor exactly just, to deprive men of so many
possessions they had held so long, including their own trees, buildings, and
fixtures, a law was once <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R.
387</note> passed with difficulty at the instance of the tribunes, that
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0367">367</date></note> nobody should hold more than 500 jugera of this
land,<note resp="translator">
<foreign xml:lang="grc">τῆσδε τῆς γῆς.</foreign> <q rend="double"><hi rend="ital">Of</hi> this
land,</q> the public land (<foreign xml:lang="lat">ager publicus</foreign>), not
land in general. There has been much controversy over the question
whether the agrarian laws of <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> were sumptuary laws intended to restrict the
amount of landed property that one man could hold, or whether they
applied only to the public domain, and this passage in Appian has played
a large part in the controversy. M. Dureau de la Malle in his
<bibl><title>Economie Politique des Romains</title>
(ii. 282 <emph>seq.</emph></bibl>) held that they were true
sumptuary laws and he cited numerous authorities in support of the
position. The most thorough examination of this question has been made
by Mr. Geo. Long in his <bibl><title>Decline of the Roman
Republic</title> (i. 144-159)</bibl>. His argument is convincing
to the effect that these laws applied only to the public lands. This is
the opinion also of Niebuhr, Mommsen, and Duruy. It may therefore be
considered settled that they were not sumptuary laws and did not limit
the amount of land a man might acquire by purchase, inheritance, or
gift. The word <foreign xml:lang="lat">possessio</foreign> in Roman law meant
not ownership, but a seizing or sitting upon land. A Possessor was a
squatter. The law referred to by Appian as having been formerly passed
with difficulty was the Licinian law, B.C. <date when="-0367">367</date>. The Roman jugerum was about two-thirds of an acre.</note>
or pasture on it more than 100 cattle or 500 sheep. To ensure the observance
of this law it was provided also that there should be a certain number of
freemen employed on the farms, whose business it should be to watch and
report what was going on.<note resp="translator">
<foreign xml:lang="grc">τὰ γιγνομένα,</foreign> <q rend="double">what was going on.</q> Mr.
Long in his history (i. 161 and 166) construes this phrase by the word
<q rend="double">produce,</q> meaning that it was the duty of the freemen employed on the
farms to keep account of the crops and make reports to the public
authorities so that the state might receive its due share. This may be
the true meaning, but it should be observed that in the preceding
section where the author speaks of the yearly produce he uses the words
<foreign xml:lang="grc">τῶν ἐτησίων καρπῶν.</foreign> According to
the other interpretation it was the duty of the freemen to keep watch
and make reports to the masters in order to prevent servile
insurrection.</note> Those who held possession of lands under the law
were required to take an oath to obey the law, and penalties were fixed for
violating it, and it was supposed that the remaining land would soon be
divided among the poor in small parcels. But there was not the smallest
consideration shown for the law or the oaths. The few who seemed to pay some
respect to them conveyed their lands to their relations fraudulently, but
the greater part disregarded it altogether. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 621</note>
</p>
</div><div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>At length Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus, an illustrious man, eager for glory,
a most powerful speaker, and for these reasons well known to all, delivered
an eloquent discourse, while serving as tribune, concerning the Italian
race, lamenting that a people so valiant in war, and blood relations to the
Romans, were declining little by little in pauperism and paucity of numbers
without any hope of remedy. He inveighed against the multitude of slaves as
useless in war and never faithful to their masters, and adduced the recent
calamity brought upon the masters by their slaves in <placeName key="tgn,7003122">Sicily</placeName>, where the demands of agriculture
had greatly increased the number of the latter; recalling also the war waged
against them by the Romans, which was neither easy nor short, but
long-protracted and full of vicissitudes <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0133">133</date></note> and dangers.
After speaking thus he again brought forward the law, providing that nobody
should hold more than 500 jugera of the public domain. But he added a
provision to the former law, that the sons of the present occupiers might
each hold one-half of that amount, and that the remainder should be divided
among the poor by triumvirs, who should be changed annually. </p>
</div><div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>This was extremely disturbing to the rich because, on account of the
triumvirs, they could no longer disregard the law as they had done before;
nor could they buy the allotments of others, because Gracchus had provided
against this by forbidding sales. They collected together in groups, and
made lamentation, and accused the poor of appropriating the results of their
tillage, their vineyards, and their dwellings. Some said that they had paid
the price of the land to their neighbors. Were they to lose the money with
the land? Others said that the graves of their ancestors were in the ground,
which had been allotted to them in the division of their fathers’ estates.
Others said that their wives’ dowries had been expended on the estates, or
that the land had been given to their own daughters as dowry. Money-lenders
could show loans made on this security. All kinds of wailing and expressions
of indignation were heard at once. On the other side were heard the
lamentations of the poor—that they had been reduced from competence to
extreme penury, and from that to childlessness, because they were unable to
rear their offspring. They recounted the military services they had
rendered, by which this very land had been acquired, and were angry that
they should be robbed of their share of the common property. They reproached
the rich for employing slaves, who were always faithless and ill-tempered
and for that reason unserviceable in war, instead of freemen, citizens, and
soldiers. While these classes were lamenting and indulging in mutual
accusations, a great number of others, composed of colonists, or inhabitants
of the free towns, or persons otherwise interested in the lands and who were
under like apprehensions, flocked in and took sides with their respective
factions. Emboldened by numbers and exasperated against each other they
attached themselves to turbulent crowds, and waited for the voting on the
new law, some trying to prevent its enactment by all means, and others
supporting it in every possible way. In addition to personal interest the
spirit of rivalry spurred both sides in the preparations they were making
against each other for the day of the comitia. </p>
</div><div n="11" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>What Gracchus had in his mind in proposing the measure was not wealth, but an
increase of efficient population. Inspired greatly by the usefulness of the
work, and believing that nothing more advantageous or admirable could ever
happen to <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName>, he took no account
of the difficulties surrounding it. When the time for voting came he
advanced many other arguments at considerable length and also asked them
whether it was not just to divide among the common people what belonged to
them in common; whether a citizen was not worthy of more consideration at
all times than a slave; whether a man who served in the army was not more
useful than one who did not; and whether one who had a share in the country
was not more likely to be devoted to the public interests. He did not dwell
long on this comparison between freemen and slaves, which he considered
degrading, but proceeded at once to a review of their hopes and fears for
the country, saying that the Romans had acquired most of their territory by
conquest, and that they had hopes of occupying the rest of the habitable
world, but now the question of greatest hazard was, whether they should gain
the rest by having plenty of brave men, or whether, through their weakness
and mutual jealousy, their enemies should take away what they already
possessed. After exaggerating the glory and riches on the one side and the
danger and fear on the other, he admonished the rich to take heed, and said
that for the realization of these, hopes they ought to bestow this very land
as a free gift, if necessary, on men who would rear children, and not, by
contending about small things, overlook larger ones; especially since they
were receiving an ample compensation for labor expended in the undisputed
title to 500 jugera each of free land, in a high state of cultivation,
without cost, and half as much more for each son of those who had sons.
After saying much more to the same purport and exciting the poor, as well as
others who were moved by reason rather than by the desire for gain, he
ordered the scribe to read the proposed law. </p>
</div><div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Marcus Octavius, another tribune, who had been induced by those in possession
of the lands to interpose his veto (for among the Romans the tribune’s veto
always prevailed), ordered the scribe to keep silence. Thereupon Gracchus
reproached him severely and adjourned the comitia to the following day. Then
he stationed a sufficient guard, as if to force Octavius against his will,
and ordered the scribe with threats to read the proposed law to the
multitude. He began to read, but when Octavius again vetoed he stopped. Then
the tribunes fell to wrangling with each other, and a considerable tumult
arose among the people. The leading citizens besought the tribunes to submit
their controversy to the Senate for decision. Gracchus seized on the
suggestion, believing that the law was acceptable to all well-disposed
persons, and hastened to the senate-house. There, as he had only a few
followers and was upbraided by the rich, he ran back to the forum and said
that he would take the vote at the comitia of the following day, both on the
law and on the magistracy of Octavius, to determine whether a tribune who
was acting contrary to the people’s interest could continue to hold his
office. And so he did, for when Octavius, nothing daunted, again interposed,
Gracchus distributed the pebbles to take a vote on him first. When the first
tribe voted to abrogate the magistracy of Octavius, Gracchus turned to him
and begged him to desist from this veto. As he would not yield, the votes of
the other tribes were taken. There were thirty-five tribes at that time. The
seventeen that voted first angrily sustained this motion. If the eighteenth
should do the same it would make a majority. Again did Gracchus, in the
sight of the people, urgently importune Octavius in his present extreme
danger not to prevent this most pious work, so useful to all <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName>, and not to frustrate the wishes so
earnestly entertained by the people, whose desires he ought rather to share
in his character of tribune, and not to risk the loss of his office by
public condemnation. After speaking thus he called the gods to witness that
he did not willingly do any despite to his colleague. As Octavius was still
unyielding he went on taking the vote. Octavius was forthwith reduced to the
rank of a private citizen and slunk away unobserved.<note resp="translator">This was an unconstitutional proceeding. Under
Roman law a tribune could not be deprived of his office during his
official term.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="13" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Quintus Mummius was chosen tribune in his place, and the agrarian law was
enacted. The first triumvirs appointed to divide the land were Gracchus
himself, the proposer of the law, his brother of the same name, and his
father-in-law, Appius Claudius, since the people still feared that the law
might fail of execution unless Gracchus should be put in the lead with his
whole family. Gracchus became immensely popular by reason of the law and was
escorted home by the multitude as though he were the founder, not of a
single city or race, but of all the nations of <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName>. After, this the victorious party returned to the
fields from which they had come to attend to this business. The defeated
ones remained in the city and talked the matter over, feeling bitterly, and
saying that as soon as Gracchus should become a private citizen he would be
sorry that he had done despite to the sacred and inviolable office of
tribune, and had opened such a fountain of discord in <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName>.</p>
</div></div>
  <div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER II</head>
<head>New Election of Tribunes — Riot on the <placeName key="tgn,7006963">Capitoline Hill</placeName>—Death of Gracchus</head>
<div n="14" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>At the advent of summer the notices for the election of tribunes were given,
and as the day for voting approached it was very evident that the rich were
earnestly promoting the election of those most inimical to Gracchus. The
latter, fearing that evil would befall if he should not be reelected for the
following year, summoned his friends from the fields to attend the comitia,
but as they were occupied with their harvest he was obliged, when the day
fixed for the voting drew near, to have recourse to the plebeians of the
city. So he went around asking each one separately to elect him tribune for
the ensuing year, on account of the danger he had incurred for them. When
the voting took place the first two tribes pronounced for Gracchus. The rich
objected that it was not lawful for the same man to hold the office twice in
succession. The tribune Rubrius, who had been chosen by lot to preside over
the comitia, was in doubt about it, and Mummius, who had been chosen in
place of Octavius, urged him to turn over the comitia to his charge. This he
did, but the remaining tribunes contended that the presidency should be
decided by lot, saying that when Rubrius, who had been chosen in that way,
resigned, the casting of lots ought to be done over again for all. As there
was much strife over this question, Gracchus, who was getting the worst of
it, adjourned the voting to the following day. In utter despair he clothed
himself in black, while still in office, and led his son around the forum
and introduced him to each man and committed him to their charge, as if he
were about to perish at the hands of his enemies. </p>
</div><div n="15" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The poor were moved with deep sorrow, and rightly so, both on their own
account (for they believed that they were no longer to live in a free state
under equal laws, but were reduced to servitude by the rich), and on account
of Gracchus himself, who had incurred such danger and suffering in their
behalf. So they all accompanied him with tears to his house in the evening,
and bade him be of good courage for the morrow. Gracchus cheered up,
assembled his partisans before daybreak, and communicated to them a signal
to be displayed in case of a fight. He then took possession of the temple on
the Capitoline hill, where the voting was to take place, and occupied the
middle of the assembly. As he was obstructed by the other tribunes and by
the rich, who would not allow the votes to be taken on this question, he
gave the signal. There was a sudden shout from those who saw it, and a
resort to violence in consequence. Some of the partisans of Gracchus took
position around him like body-guards. Others, having girded themselves,
seized the fasces and staves in the hands of the lictors and broke them in
pieces. They drove the rich out of the assembly with such disorder and
wounds that the tribunes fled from their places in terror, and the priests
closed the doors of the temple. Many ran away pell-mell and scattered wild
rumors. Some said that Gracchus had deposed all the other tribunes, and this
was believed because none of them could be seen. Others said that he had
declared himself tribune for the ensuing year without an election. </p>
</div><div n="16" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Under these circumstances the Senate assembled at the temple of Fides.<note resp="translator">The temple to the goddess of
Public Faith was on the Capitoline hill.</note> It is astonishing to me
that they never thought of appointing a dictator in this emergency, although
they had often been protected by the government of a single ruler in such
times of peril. Although this resource had been found most useful in former
times few people remembered it, either then or later. After reaching the
decision that they did reach, they marched up to the Capitol, Cornelius
Scipio Nasica, the pontifex maximus, leading the way and calling out with a
loud voice, <q rend="double">Let those who would save the country follow me.</q> He wound the
border of his toga about his head either to induce a greater number to go
with him by the singularity of his appearance, or to make for himself, as it
were, a helmet as a sign of battle for those who looked on, or in order to
conceal from the gods what he was about to do. When he arrived at the temple
and advanced against the partisans of Gracchus they yielded to the
reputation of a foremost citizen, for they saw the Senate following with
him. The latter wrested clubs out of the hands of the Gracchans themselves,
or with fragments of broken benches or other apparatus that had been brought
for the use of the assembly, began beating them, and pursued them, and drove
them over the precipice.<note resp="translator">The
Capitoline hill was flanked by the Tarpeian Rock.</note> In the tumult
many of the Gracchans perished, and Gracchus himself was caught<note resp="translator">Reading <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἁλώμενος,</foreign> which Mendelssohn prefers instead of <foreign xml:lang="grc">εἰλούμενος.</foreign></note> near the temple, and was
slain at the door close by the statues of the kings. All the bodies were
thrown by night into the <placeName key="tgn,1130786">Tiber</placeName>. </p>
</div><div n="17" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>So perished on the Capitol, and while still tribune, Gracchus, the son of the
Gracchus who was twice consul, and of Cornelia, daughter of that Scipio who
subjugated <placeName key="perseus,Carthage">Carthage</placeName>. He lost
his life in consequence of a most excellent design, which, however, he
pursued in too violent a manner. This shocking affair, the first that was
perpetrated in the public assembly, was seldom without parallels thereafter
from time to time. On the subject of the murder of Gracchus the city was
divided between sorrow and joy. Some mourned for themselves and for him, and
deplored the present condition of things, believing that the commonwealth no
longer existed, but had been supplanted by force and violence. Others
considered that everything had turned out for them exactly as they wished.
These things took place at the time when Aristonicus was contending with the
Romans for the government of <placeName key="tgn,1000004">Asia</placeName>.</p>
</div></div>
  <div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER III</head>
<head>Litigation under the Law of Gracchus—Scipio aemilianus employed
in it — His Mysterious Death — Gaius Gracchus elected Tribune — He
gives the Judicial Power to Knights—Demands Roman Citizenship for
Italian Allies—Sails to <placeName key="tgn,7001242">Africa</placeName>
with Fulvius Flaccus—Rioting in <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> after his Return—Death of Gracchus and
Flaccus</head>
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 622</note>
<div n="18" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After Gracchus was slain Appius Claudius died, and Fulvius Flaccus and
Papirius Carbo were appointed, in conjunction with the younger Gracchus, to
divide the land. As the persons in possession neglected to hand in lists of
their holdings, a proclamation was issued that informers should furnish
testimony against them. Immediately a great number of embarrassing lawsuits
sprang up. Wherever a new field had been bought adjoining an old one, or
wherever a division of land had been made with allies, the whole district
had to be carefully inquired into on account of the measurement of this one
field, to discover how it had been sold and how divided. Not all owners had
preserved their contracts, or their allotment titles, and even those that
were found were often ambiguous. When the land was resurveyed some owners
were obliged to give up their fruit-trees and farm-buildings in exchange for
naked ground. Others were transferred from cultivated to uncultivated lands,
or to swamps, or pools. In fact, the measuring had not been carefully done
when the land was first taken from the enemy. As the original proclamation
authorized anybody to work the undistributed land who wished to do so, many
had been prompted to cultivate the parts immediately adjoining their own,
till the line of demarkation <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0132">132</date></note> between them had faded from
view. The progress of time also made many changes. Thus the injustice done
by the rich, although great, was not easy of ascertainment. So there was
nothing but a general turn-about, all parties being moved out of their own
places and settled down in other people’s. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 625</note>
</p>
</div><div n="19" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The Italian allies who complained of these disturbances, <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0129">129</date></note> and
especially of the lawsuits hastily brought against them, chose Cornelius
Scipio, the destroyer of <placeName key="perseus,Carthage">Carthage</placeName>, to defend them against these grievances. As he
had availed himself of their very valiant services in war he was reluctant
to disregard their request. So he came into the Senate, and although, out of
regard for the plebeians, he did not openly find fault with the law of
Gracchus, he expatiated on its difficulties and held that these causes ought
not to be decided by the triumvirs, because they did not possess the
confidence of the litigants, but should be turned over to others. As his
view seemed reasonable, they yielded to his persuasion, and the consul
Tuditanus was appointed to give judgment in these cases. But when he took
hold of the work he saw the difficulties of it, and marched against the
Illyrians as a pretext for not acting as judge, and since nobody brought
cases for trial before the triumvirs they relapsed into idleness. From this
cause hatred and indignation arose among the people against Scipio because
they saw him, in whose favor they had often opposed the aristocracy and
incurred their enmity, electing him consul twice contrary to law, now taking
the side of the Italian allies against them. When Scipio’s enemies observed
this, they cried out that he was determined to abolish the law of Gracchus
utterly and was about to inaugurate armed strife and bloodshed for that
purpose. </p>
</div><div n="20" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the people heard these charges they were in a state of alarm until
Scipio, after placing near his couch at home one evening a tablet on which
he intended to write during the night the speech he intended to deliver
before the people, was found dead in his bed without a wound. Whether this
was done by Cornelia, the mother of the Gracchi (aided by her daughter,
Sempronia, who was married to Scipio, and was unloved and unloving because
she was deformed and childless), lest the law of Gracchus should be
abolished, or whether, as some think, he committed suicide because he saw
plainly that he could not accomplish what he had promised, is not known.
Some say that slaves, who were subjected to torture, testified that unknown
persons were introduced through the rear of the house by night who
suffocated him, and that those who knew about it hesitated to tell because
the people were angry with him still and rejoiced at his death. So died
Scipio, and although he had been of immense service to the Roman power he
was not honored with a public funeral; so much does the anger of the present
moment outweigh gratitude for the past. And this event, sufficiently
important in itself, took place as an incident of the sedition of
Gracchus.<note resp="translator">It is uncertain
whether Scipio was murdered or not. Cicero alludes to the event in one
of his letters (<title>Ad Fam.</title> ix. 21), in which, speaking of
one Gaius Carbo, he says that he was thought to have laid violent hands
upon Africanus. Velleius says that marks of strangulation were found on
his neck, yet adds in the same paragraph that most people thought he
died a natural death.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="21" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Those who were in possession of the lands even after these events postponed
the division on various pretexts for a very long time. Some thought that the
Italian allies, who made the greatest resistance to it, ought to be admitted
to Roman citizenship so that, out of gratitude for the greater favor, they
should no longer quarrel about the <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 629</note> land. The Italians were glad to accept
this, because they <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0125">125</date></note> preferred Roman citizenship to
possession of the fields. Fulvius Flaccus, who was then both consul and
triumvir, exerted himself to the utmost to bring it about, but the Senate
was angry at the proposal to make their subjects <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 630</note> equal citizens with themselves.
For this reason the attempt <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C.
<date when="-0124">124</date></note> was abandoned, and the people,
who had been so long in the hope of acquiring land, became disheartened.
While they were in this mood Gaius Gracchus, who had made himself agreeable
to them as a triumvir, offered himself for the tribuneship. He was the
younger brother of Tiberius Gracchus, the promoter of the law, and had been
silent for some time on the subject of the fate of his brother, but since
many of the senators treated him scornfully he announced <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 631</note> himself as a
candidate for the office of tribune. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0123">123</date></note> As soon as he was
elected to this distinguished position he began to lay plots against the
Senate, and proposed that a monthly distribution of corn should be made to
each citizen at the public expense, which had not been customary before.
Thus he got the leadership of the people quickly by one measure of policy,
in which he had the coöperation of Fulvius Flaccus. Directly after
that he was chosen tribune for the following year, for in cases where there
was not a sufficient number of candidates the law authorized the people to
choose from the whole number then in office. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 632</note>
</p>
</div><div n="22" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus Gaius Gracchus became tribune a second time. Having bought the
plebeians, as it were, he began, by another like political
manœuvre, to court the equestrian order, who hold the middle place
between the Senate and the plebeians. He transferred the courts of justice,
which had become discredited by reason of bribery, from the senators to the
knights, reproaching the former especially with the recent examples of
Aurelius Cotta, Salinator, and, third in the list, Manius Aquilius (the one
who subdued <placeName key="tgn,1000004">Asia</placeName>), all notorious
bribe-takers, who had been acquitted by the judges, although ambassadors
sent to complain against them were still present, going around uttering
hateful accusations against them. The Senate was extremely ashamed of these
things and yielded to the law, and the people ratified it. In this way were
the courts of justice transferred from the Senate to the knights. It is said
that soon after the passage of this law Gracchus remarked that he had broken
the power of the Senate once for all. This saying of Gracchus has been even
more confirmed by experience in the course of events. This power of sitting
in judgment on all Romans and Italians, including the senators themselves,
in all matters as to property, civil rights, and banishment, exalted the
knights like rulers over them and put senators on the same level with
subjects. Moreover, as the knights voted in the election to sustain the
power of the tribunes, and obtained from them whatever they wanted in
return, they became more and more formidable to the senators. So it shortly
came about that the political mastery was turned upside down, the power
being in the hands of the knights, and the honor only remaining <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0122">122</date></note> with the Senate. The knights went so far that they
not only held power over the senators, but they openly flouted them beyond
their right. They also became addicted to bribe-taking, and having once
tasted these enormous gains, they indulged in them even more basely and
immoderately than the senators had done.<note resp="translator">Cicero in his first oration against Verres (xiii.) says
that there was no bribery of judges while the knights held that office,
but inasmuch as he was trying to shame the senators against taking
Verres’ money, it would not be safe to accept the statement as literally
true.</note> They suborned accusers against the rich and did away with
prosecutions for bribe-taking altogether, partly by concert of action and
partly by force and violence, so that the practice of this kind of
investigation became entirely obsolete. Thus the judiciary law gave rise to
another struggle of factions, which lasted a long time and was not less
baneful than the former ones. </p>
</div><div n="23" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Gracchus made long roads throughout <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName> and thus put a multitude of contractors and artisans
under obligations to him and made them ready to do whatever he wished. He
proposed the founding of numerous colonies.<note resp="translator">The founding of colonies, which was originally a method of
guarding the frontier, now became a method of providing for the poorer
citizens.</note> He also called on the Latin allies to demand the full
rights of Roman citizenship, since the Senate could not with decency refuse
this privilege to their blood relations. To the other allies, who were not
allowed to vote in Roman elections, he sought to give the right of suffrage,
in order to have their help in the enactment of laws which he had in
contemplation. The Senate was very much alarmed at this, and it ordered the
consuls to give the following public notice, <q rend="double">Nobody who does not possess
the right of suffrage shall stay in the city or approach within forty stades
of it while voting is going on concerning these laws.</q> The Senate also
persuaded Livius Drusus, another tribune, to interpose his veto against the
laws proposed by Gracchus, but not to tell the people his reasons for doing
so; for a tribune was not required to give reasons for his veto. In order to
conciliate the people they gave Drusus the privilege of founding twelve
colonies, and the plebeians were so much pleased with this that they began
to scoff at the laws proposed by Gracchus. </p>
</div><div n="24" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Having lost the favor of the rabble, Gracchus sailed for <placeName key="tgn,7001242">Africa</placeName> in company with Fulvius Flaccus,
who, after his consulship, had been chosen tribune for the same reasons as
Gracchus himself. A colony had been voted to <placeName key="tgn,7001242">Africa</placeName> on account of its reputed fertility, and these men
had been expressly chosen the founders of it in order to get them out of the
way for a while, so that the Senate might have a respite from demagogism.
They marked out a town for the colony on the place where <placeName key="perseus,Carthage">Carthage</placeName> had formerly stood,
disregarding the fact that Scipio, when he destroyed it, had devoted it with
curses to sheep-pasturage forever. They assigned 6000 colonists to this
place, instead of the smaller number fixed by law, in order further to curry
favor with the people thereby. When they returned to <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> they invited the 6000 from the whole
of <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName>. The functionaries who
were still in <placeName key="tgn,7001242">Africa</placeName> laying out the
city wrote home that wolves had pulled up and scattered the boundary marks
made by Gracchus and Fulvius, and the soothsayers considered this an ill
omen for the colony. So the Senate <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 633</note> summoned the comitia, in which it was
proposed to repeal <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0121">121</date></note> the law concerning this colony. When
Gracchus and Fulvius saw their failure in this matter they were furious, and
declared that the Senate had lied about the wolves. The boldest of the
plebeians joined them, carrying daggers, and proceeded to the Capitol, where
the assembly was to be held in reference to the colony. </p>
</div><div n="25" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Now the people were assembled, and Fulvius had begun speaking about the
business in hand, when Gracchus arrived at the Capitol attended by a
body-guard of his partisans. Disturbed by what he knew about the
extraordinary plans on foot he turned aside from the meeting-place of the
assembly, passed into the portico, and walked about waiting to see what
would happen. Just then a plebeian named Antyllus, who was sacrificing in
the portico, saw him in this disturbed state, seized him by the hand, either
because he had heard something or suspected something, or was moved to speak
to him for some other reason, and asked him to spare his country. Gracchus,
still more disturbed, and startled like one detected in a crime, gave the
man a piercing look. Then one of his party, although no signal had been
displayed or order given, inferred merely from the very sharp glance that
Gracchus cast upon Antyllus that the time for action had come, and thought
that he should do a favor to Gracchus by striking the first blow. So he drew
his dagger and slew Antyllus. A cry was raised, the dead body was seen in
the midst of the crowd, and all who were outside fled from the temple in
fear of a like fate. Gracchus went into the assembly desiring to exculpate
himself of the deed. Nobody would so much as listen to him. All turned away
from him as from one stained with blood. Gracchus and Flaccus were
nonplussed and, having lost the chance of accomplishing what they wished,
they hastened home, and their partisans with them. The rest of the crowd
occupied the forum throughout the night as though some calamity were
impending. Opimius, one of the consuls, who was staying in the city, ordered
an armed force to be stationed at the Capitol at daybreak, and sent heralds
to convoke the Senate. He took his own station in the temple of Castor and
Pollux in the centre of the city and there awaited events. </p>
</div><div n="26" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When these arrangements had been made the Senate summoned Gracchus and
Flaccus from their homes to the senate-house to defend themselves. But they
ran out armed toward the <placeName key="tgn,4012809">Aventine</placeName>
hill, hoping that if they could seize it first the Senate would agree to
some terms with them. They ran through the city offering freedom to the
slaves, but none listened to them. With such forces as they had, however,
they occupied and fortified the temple of Diana, and sent Quintus, the son
of Flaccus, to the Senate seeking to come to an arrangement and to live in
peace. The Senate replied that they should lay down their arms, come to the
senate-house, tell what they wanted, or else send no more messengers. When
they sent Quintus a second time the consul Opimius arrested him, as being no
longer an ambassador after he had been warned, and at the same time sent an
armed force against the Gracchans. Gracchus fled across the river by the
Sublician bridge,<note resp="translator">This well-known
construction is called the <q rend="double">wooden bridge</q> in Appian’s history. The
Romans called it <q rend="double">Sublicius pons</q> because it rested on wooden
piles.</note> with one slave, to a grove where he presented his throat
to the slave, as he was on the point of being arrested. Flaccus took refuge
in the workshop of an acquaintance. As his pursuers did not know which house
he was in they threatened to burn the whole row. The man who had given
shelter to the suppliant hesitated to point him out, but directed another
man to do so. Flaccus was seized and put to death. The heads of Gracchus and
Flaccus were carried to Opimius, and he gave their weight in gold to those
who brought them. The people plundered their houses. Opimius arrested their
fellow-conspirators, cast them into prison, and ordered that they should be
strangled. He allowed Quintus, the son of Flaccus, to choose his own mode of
death. After this a lustration was performed in behalf of the city for the
bloodshed, and the Senate ordered the building of a temple to Concord in the
forum.</p>
</div></div>
  <div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER IV</head>
<head>Failure of the Agrarian Law—The Killing of Nonius—Division of Gallic
Land—The Sedition of Saturninus—Banishment of Metellus — Murder of
Memmius — Punishment of Saturninus — Reign of Terror</head>
<div n="27" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>So the sedition of the younger Gracchus came to an end. Not long afterward a
law was enacted to permit the holders to sell the land about which they had
quarrelled; for even this had been forbidden by the law of the elder
Gracchus. Presently the rich bought the allotments of the poor, or found
pretexts for seizing them by force. So the condition of the poor became even
worse than it was before, until Spurius Borius, a tribune of the people,
brought in a law providing that the work of distributing the public domain
should no longer be continued, but that the land should belong to those in
possession of it, who should pay rent for it to the people, and that the
money so received should be distributed. This distribution was a kind of
solace to the poor, but it did not serve to increase the population. By
these devices the law of Gracchus (most excellent and useful if it could
have been carried out) was once for all frustrated, and a little later the
rent itself was abolished at the instance of another tribune. So the
piebeians lost everything. Whence resulted a still further decline in the
numbers of both citizens and soldiers, and in the revenue from the land and
the distribution thereof; and about fifteen years after the enactment of the
law of Gracchus, the laws themselves fell into abeyance by reason of the
slackness of the judicial proceedings.<note resp="translator">The meaning of the last sentence of Sec. 27 is doubtful.
Schweighäuser suspected a lacuna. <q rend="double">Desperandum de totius
enuntiati inde ab <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὄθεν</foreign> verbo vel
emendatione vel enarratione,</q> says Mendelssohn. I have followed the
rendering of M. Combes-Dounous.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="28" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>About this time the consul Scipio [Nasica] demolished the theatre begun by
Lucius Cassius, and now nearly finished, because he considered this also the
source of new seditions or because he thought it not altogether desirable
that the Romans should become accustomed to Grecian pleasures. The censor,
Quintus Caecelius Metellus, attempted to degrade Glaucia, a
senator, and Apuleius Saturninus, who had already been a tribune, on account
of their disgraceful mode of life, but was not able to do so because his
colleague <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 653</note> would
not agree to it. Accordingly Saturninus, a <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0101">101</date></note> little later, in
order to have revenge on Metellus, became a candidate for the tribuneship
again, seizing the occasion when Glaucia held the office of praetor
and presided over the election of the tribunes; but Nonius, a man of noble
birth, who used much plainness of speech in reference to Saturninus and
reproached Glaucia bitterly, was chosen for the office. As they feared lest
he should punish them as tribune, they made a rush upon him with a crowd of
ruffians just as he was going away from the comitia, pursued him into a
certain inn, and stabbed him. As this murder had a pitiful and shocking
aspect, the adherents of Glaucia came together early the next morning,
before the people had assembled, and declared Saturninus elected tribune. In
this way the killing of Nonius was hushed up, since everybody was afraid to
call Saturninus to account because he was a tribune. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 654</note>
</p>
</div><div n="29" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Metellus was banished by them at the instigation of Gaius Marius, who was
then in his sixth consulship, and was the secret enemy of Metellus. Thus
they all helped each other. Saturninus brought forward a law to divide the
land which the Cimbri (a Celtic tribe lately driven out <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0100">100</date></note> by
Marius) had seized in the country now called <placeName key="tgn,1000070">Gaul</placeName> by the Romans, and which was considered as no longer
Gallic but Roman territory. It was provided also in this law that if the
people should enact it the senators should take an oath within five days to
obey it, and that any one who should refuse to do so should be expelled from
the Senate and should pay a fine of twenty talents for the benefit of the
people. Thus they intended to punish those who should take it with a bad
grace, and especially Metellus, who was too high-spirited to submit to the
oath. Such was the proposed law. Saturninus appointed the day for holding
the comitia and sent messengers to summon from the country districts those
in whom he had most confidence, because they had served in the army under
Marius. As the law gave the larger share to the Italian allies the city
people were not pleased with it. </p>
</div><div n="30" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Sedition broke out in the comitia. Those who attempted to prevent the passage
of the laws proposed by the tribunes were assaulted by Saturninus and driven
away from the rostra. The city folks exclaimed that thunder was heard in the
assembly, in which case it is not permitted by Roman custom to finish the
business that day. As the adherents of Saturninus persisted nevertheless,
the city people girded themselves, seized whatever clubs they could lay
their hands on, and dispersed the rustics. The latter were rallied by
Saturninus; they attacked the city folks with clubs, overcame them, and
passed the law. When this was done Marius, in his capacity as consul,
forthwith proposed to the Senate that they consider concerning taking the
oath. Knowing that Metellus was a man of fixed opinion and firm in whatever
he might believe or commit himself to, he gave his own opinion publicly, but
deceitfully, saying that he would never willingly take this oath himself.
When Metellus had agreed with him in this, and the others had praised them
both, Marius adjourned the Senate. On the fifth day thereafter (the last day
prescribed in the law for taking the oath) he called them together in haste
about the tenth hour, saying that he was afraid of the people because they
were so zealous for the law. He saw a way, however, to avoid it, and he
proposed the following trick—to swear that they would obey the law as far
as it was a law, and thus at once disperse the country people by stratagem.
Afterward it could be easily shown that this thing, which had been enacted
by violence and in spite of thunder, contrary to the custom of their
ancestors, was not a law. </p>
</div><div n="31" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After speaking thus he did not wait for the result, but while all were in
silent amazement at the plot, and confused because there was no time to be
lost and no opportunity for thinking, he rose and went to the temple of
Saturn, where the quaestors were accustomed to administer oaths,
and took the oath first with his friends. The rest followed his example, as
each one feared for his own safety. Metellus alone refused to swear, but
stood fearlessly by his first determination. Saturninus proceeded against
him at once on the next day. He sent an officer for him and dragged him out
of the senate-house. As the other tribunes defended him Glaucia and
Saturninus hastened to the country people and told them that they would
never get the land, and that the law would not be executed, unless Metellus
were banished. They proposed a decree of banishment against him and directed
the consuls to interdict fire and water and shelter to him, and appointed a
day for the ratification of this decree. Great was the indignation of the
city people, who constantly escorted Metellus, carrying daggers. He thanked
them and praised them for their good intentions, but said that he could not
allow any danger to befall the country on his account. After saying this he
withdrew from the city. Saturninus got the decree ratified, and Marius made
proclamation that it was a part of the law. </p>
</div><div n="32" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In this way was Metellus, a most admirable man, sent into banishment.
Thereupon Saturninus was made tribune a third time and he had for a
colleague one who was thought to be a fugitive slave, but who claimed to be
a son of the elder Gracchus. The multitude supported him in the election
because they regretted Gracchus. When the election for consuls came on
Marcus Antonius was chosen as one of them by common consent. The aforesaid
Glaucia and Memmius contended for the other place. Memmius was the more
illustrious man by far, and Glaucia and Saturninus were fearful of the
result. So they sent a gang of ruffians to attack him with clubs while the
election was going on. They fell upon him in the midst of the comitia and
beat him to death in the sight of all. The assembly was broken up in terror.
Neither laws nor courts nor sense of shame remained. The people ran together
in anger the following day intending to kill Saturninus, but he had
collected another mob from the country and, with Glaucia and Gaius Saufeius,
the quaestor, seized the Capitol. The Senate voted them public
enemies. Marius was vexed; nevertheless he armed some of his forces
reluctantly, and, while he was delaying, some other persons cut off the
water-supply from the Capitoline temple. Saufeius was near perishing with
thirst and proposed to set the temple on fire, but Glaucia and Saturninus,
who hoped that Marius would assist them, surrendered first, and after them
Saufeius. As everybody demanded that they should be put to death, Marius
shut them up in the senate-house as though he intended to deal with them in
a more legal manner. The crowd considered this a mere pretext. They tore the
tiles off the roof and stoned them to death, including a quaestor,
a tribune, and a praetor, who were still wearing their insignia of
office. </p>
</div><div n="33" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Very many others were swept out of existence in this sedition. Among them was
that other tribune who was supposed to be the son of Gracchus, and who
perished on that first day of his magistracy. Freedom, democracy, laws,
reputation, official position, were no longer of any use to anybody, since
even the tribunician office, which had been devised for the restraint of
wrong-doers and the protection of the plebeians, and was sacred and
inviolable, now committed such outrages and suffered such indignities. When
the party of Saturninus was destroyed the Senate and people clamored for the
recall of Metellus, but Publius Furius, a tribune who was not the son of a
free citizen but of a freedman, boldly resisted them. Not even Metellus, the
son of Metellus, who besought him in the presence of the people with tears
in his eyes, and threw himself at his feet, could move him. From this
spectacle the son ever afterward bore the name of Metellus Pius. The
following year Furius was called to account for his obstinacy by the new
tribune, Gaius Canuleius. The people did not wait <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 655</note> for the argument, but tore Furius
in pieces. Thus every <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0099">99</date></note> year some new deed of abomination was
committed in the forum. Metellus was allowed to return, and it is said that
a whole day was not sufficient for the greetings of those who went to meet
him at the city gates. Such was the third civil strife (that of Saturninus)
which succeeded those of the two Gracchi, and such results it brought to the
Romans.</p>
</div></div>
  <div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER V</head>
<head>Origin of the Social War—Measures of Livius Drusus—Murder of Drusus —
Continued Seditions — Revolt of the Italians — The Social War—Leaders
on Either Side—Various Battles—The Consul Rutilius killed</head>
<div n="34" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While they were thus occupied the so-called Social War, in which many Italian
peoples were engaged, broke out. It began unexpectedly, grew to great
proportions rapidly, and extinguished the Roman seditions for a long time by
a new terror. When it was ended it gave rise to new seditions under more
powerful leaders, who did not work by introducing new laws, or by playing
the demagogue, but by employing whole armies against each other. I have
treated it in this history because it had its origin in a Roman sedition and
resulted in another one much worse. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 629</note> It began in this way. Fulvius Flaccus in
his consulship <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0125">125</date></note> first openly excited among the
Italians the desire for Roman citizenship, so as to be partners in the
hegemony instead of subjects. When he introduced this idea and strenuously
persisted in it, the Senate, for that reason, sent him away to take command
in a war, in the course of which his consulship expired, but he obtained the
tribuneship after that and managed to have the younger Gracchus for a
colleague, with whose coöperation he brought forward other measures
in favor of the Italians. When they were both killed, as I have previously
related, the Italians were still more excited. They could not bear to be
considered subjects instead of equals, or to think that Flaccus and Gracchus
should suffer such calamities while working for their political advantage.
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 663</note>
</p>
</div><div n="35" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After them the tribune Livius Drusus, a man of most <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0091">91</date></note>
illustrious birth, promised the Italians, at their urgent request, that he
would bring forward a new law to give them citizenship. They desired this
especially because by that one step they would become rulers instead of
subjects. In order to conciliate the plebeians to this measure he led out to
<placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName> and <placeName key="tgn,7003122">Sicily</placeName> several colonies which had been
voted some time before, but not yet planted. He endeavored to bring to an
agreement the Senate and the equestrian order, who were then in sharp
antagonism to each other, in reference to the law courts. As he was not able
to restore the courts to the Senate openly, he tried the following artifice
on both of them. As the senators had been reduced by the seditions to
scarcely 300 in number, he brought forward a law that an equal number should
be added to their enrolment from the knights, to be chosen according to
merit, and that the law courts should be made up from all of these
hereafter. He provided in the law that they should make investigations about
bribery, as accusations of that kind were almost unknown, since the custom
of bribe-taking prevailed without restraint. This was the plan that he
contrived for both of them, but it turned out contrary to his expectations,
for the senators were indignant that so large a number should be added to
their enrolment at one time and be transferred from knighthood to the
highest rank. They thought it not unlikely that they would form a faction in
the Senate by themselves and contend against the old senators more
powerfully than ever. The knights, on the other hand, suspected that, by
this doctoring, the courts of justice would be transferred from their order
to the Senate exclusively. Having acquired a relish for the great gains and
power of the judicial office, this suspicion disturbed them. Most of them
fell into doubt and distrust toward each other, discussing which ones seemed
more worthy than others to be enrolled among the 300; and envy against their
betters filled the breasts of the remainder. Above all were they angry at
the revival of the charge of bribery, which they thought had been ere this
entirely suppressed, so far as they were concerned. </p>
</div><div n="36" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus it came to pass that both the Senate and the knights, although opposed
to each other, were united in hating Drusus. Only the plebeians were
gratified with the colonies. The Italians, in whose interest chiefly Drusus
was devising these plans, were apprehensive about the law providing for the
colonies, because they thought that the Roman public domain (which was still
undivided and which they were cultivating, some by force and others
clandestinely) would be taken away from them, and that in many cases they
might even be disturbed in their private holdings. The Etruscans and the
Umbrians had the same fears as the Italians,<note resp="translator">Until the end of the third century B.C. the word
 <q rend="double"><placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName></q> applied only to
that part of the peninsula south of Etruria and <placeName key="tgn,7003125">Umbria</placeName>.</note> and when they were
summoned to the city, as it was thought, by the consuls, ostensibly for the
purpose of complaining against the law of Drusus, but actually, as is
believed, for the purpose of killing him, they cried down the law publicly
and waited for the day of the comitia. Drusus learned of the plot against
him and did not go out frequently, but transacted business from day to day
in the atrium of his house, which was poorly lighted. One evening as he was
sending the crowd away he exclaimed suddenly that he was wounded, and fell
down while uttering the words. A shoemaker’s knife was found thrust into his
hip. </p>
</div><div n="37" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus was Drusus also slain while serving as tribune. The knights, in order to
make his policy a ground of accusation against their enemies, persuaded the
tribune Quintus Varius to bring forward a law to prosecute those who should,
either openly or secretly, aid the Italians to acquire citizenship. They
hoped to bring all the leaders under malicious indictment, and themselves to
sit in judgment on them, and that when their enemies were out of the way
they should be more powerful than ever in the government of <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName>. When the other tribunes interposed
their veto the knights surrounded them with drawn daggers and enacted the
measure, whereupon accusers at once brought actions against the most
illustrious of the senators. Of these Bestia did not respond, but went into
exile voluntarily rather than surrender himself into the hands of his
enemies. After him Cotta went before the court, made a brilliant defence of
his administration of public affairs, and openly reviled the knights. He,
too, departed from the city before the vote of the judges was taken.
Mummius, the one who had conquered <placeName key="tgn,1000074">Greece</placeName>, was basely ensnared by the knights, who promised to
acquit him, but condemned him to banishment. He passed the remainder of his
life at <placeName key="perseus,Delos">Delos</placeName>. </p>
</div><div n="38" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As this wickedness prevailed more and more against the best citizens, the
people were grieved because they were deprived all at once of so many men
who had rendered such great services. When the Italians learned of the
killing of Drusus and of the reason alleged for banishing the others, they
considered it no longer bearable that those who were laboring for their
political advancement should suffer such outrages, and as they saw no other
means of acquiring citizenship they decided to revolt from the Romans
altogether, and to make war against them with all their might. They sent
envoys to each other secretly, formed a league, and exchanged hostages as a
pledge of good faith. The Romans were in ignorance of these facts for a long
time, being preoccupied by the judicial proceedings and the seditions in the
city. When they heard what was going on they sent men around to the towns,
choosing those who were best acquainted with each, to collect information
quietly. One of these saw a young man who was being taken as a hostage from
the town of <placeName key="perseus,Asculum">Asculum</placeName> to another
town, and informed Servilius, the proconsul in those parts. (It appears that
there were proconsuls at that time governing the various parts of <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName>; Hadrian revived the custom a long
time afterward when he held the supreme power, but it did not long survive
him.) Servilius hastened to <placeName key="perseus,Asculum">Asculum</placeName> and indulged in very menacing language to the
people, who were celebrating a festival, and they put him to death,
supposing that the plot was discovered. They also killed Fonteius, his
legate (for so they call those of the senatorial order who accompany the
governors of provinces as assistants). After these were slain none of the
other Romans in <placeName key="perseus,Asculum">Asculum</placeName> were
spared. The inhabitants fell upon them, slaughtered them all, and plundered
their goods. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 664</note>
</p>
</div><div n="39" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the revolt broke out all the neighboring peoples showed their
preparedness at the same time, the Marsi, the Peligni, the Vestini, the
Marrucini; and after them the Picentines, the Frentani, the Hirpini, the
Pompeiians, the Venusini, the Apulians, the Lucanians, and <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0090">90</date></note> the Samnites, all of whom had been hostile to the
Romans before; also all the rest extending from the river Liris (which is
now, I think, the Liternus) to the extremity of the Adriatic gulf, both
inland and sea-coast. They sent ambassadors to <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> to complain that although they had coöperated
in all ways with the Romans in building up the empire, the latter had not
been willing to admit their helpers to citizenship. The Senate answered
sternly that if they repented of what they had done they could send
ambassadors, otherwise not. The Italians, in despair of any other remedy,
went on with their preparations for war. Besides the soldiers which were
kept for guards at each town, they had forces in common amounting to about
100,000 foot and horse. The Romans sent an equal force against them, made up
of their own citizens and of the Italian peoples who were still in alliance
with them. </p>
</div><div n="40" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The Romans were led by the consuls Sextus Julius Caesar and Publius
Rutilius Lupus, for in this great civil war both consuls marched forth at
once, leaving the gates and walls in charge of others, as was customary in
cases of danger arising at home or very near by. When the war was found to
be complicated and many-sided, they sent their most renowned men as
lieutenant-generals to aid the consuls: to Rutilius, Gnaeus
Pompeius, the father of Pompey the Great, Quintus Caepio, Gaius
Perpenna, Gaius Marius, and Valerius Messala; to Sextus Caesar,
Publius Lentulus, a brother of Caesar himself, Titus Didius,
Licinius Crassus, Cornelius Sulla, and Marcellus. All these served under the
consuls and the country was divided among them. The consuls visited all
parts of the field of operations, and the Romans sent them additional forces
continually, knowing that it was a great conflict. The Italians had generals
for their united forces besides those of the separate towns. The chief
commanders were Titus Lafrenius, Gaius Pontilius, Marius Egnatius, Quintus
Pompaedius, Gaius Papius, Marcus Lamponius, Gaius Judacilius,
Herius Asinius, and Vettius Cato. They divided their army in equal parts,
took their positions against the Roman generals, performed many notable
exploits, and suffered many disasters. The most memorable events of each
class I shall here summarize. </p>
</div><div n="41" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Vettius Cato defeated Sextus Julius, killed 2000 of his men, and marched
against aesernia, which adhered to Rome. L. Scipio and L. Acilius,
who were in command here, escaped in the disguise of slaves. The enemy,
after a considerable time, reduced it by famine. Marius Egnatius captured
Venafrum by treachery and slew two Roman cohorts there. Publius Presenteius
defeated Perpenna, who had 10,000 men under his command, killed 4000 and
captured the arms of the greater part of the others, for which reason the
consul Rutilius deprived Perpenna of his command and gave his division of
the army to Gaius Marius. Marcus Lamponius destroyed some 800 of the forces
under Licinius Crassus and drove the remainder into the town of Grumentum. </p>
</div><div n="42" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Gaius Papius captured Nola by treachery and offered to the 2000 Roman
soldiers in it the privilege of serving under him if they would change their
allegiance. They did so, but as their officers refused the proposal the
latter were taken prisoners and starved to death by Papius. In conjunction
with Stabias he captured Minturnae, and Salernum, which was a Roman
colony. The prisoners and the slaves from these places were taken into the
military service. Then he plundered the entire country around Nuceria. The
towns in the vicinity were struck with terror and submitted to him, and when
he demanded military assistance they furnished him about 10,000 foot and
1000 horse. With these Papius laid siege to Acerrae. Sextus
Caesar, with 10,000 Gallic foot and certain Numidian and
Mauretanian horse and foot, advanced toward Acerrae. Papius took a
son of Jugurtha, formerly king of Numidia, named Oxynta, who was under
charge of a Roman guard at Venusia, led him out of that place, clothed him
in royal purple, and showed him frequently to the Numidians who were in
Caesar’s army. Many of them deserted, as if to their own king, so
that Caesar was obliged to send the rest back to Africa, as they
were not trustworthy. Papius attacked him rashly, and had already made a
breach in his fortified camp when Caesar debouched with his horse
through the other gates and slew about 6000 of his men, after which
Caesar withdrew from Acerrae. Canusia and Venusia and many
other towns in Apulia sided with Judacilius. Some that did not submit he
besieged, and he put to death the principal Roman citizens in them, but the
common people and the slaves he enrolled in his army. </p>
</div><div n="43" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The consul Rutilius and Gaius Marius built bridges over the river Liris at no
great distance from each other. Vettius Cato pitched his camp opposite them,
but nearer to the bridge of Marius, and placed an ambush by night in some
ravines around the bridge of Rutilius. Early in the morning, after he had
allowed Rutilius to cross the bridge, he started up from ambush and killed a
large number of the enemy on the dry land and drove many into the river. In
this fight Rutilius himself was wounded in the head by a missile and died
soon afterward. Marius was on the other bridge and when he guessed, from the
bodies floating down stream, what had happened, he pushed away those in his
front, crossed the river, and captured the camp of Cato, which was guarded
by only a small force, so that Cato was obliged to spend the night where he
had won his victory, and to retreat in the morning for want of provisions.
The body of Rutilius and those of many other patricians were brought to Rome
for burial. The corpses of the consul and his numerous comrades made a
piteous spectacle and the mourning lasted many days. The Senate decreed from
this time on that those who were killed in war should be buried where they
fell, lest others should be deterred by the spectacle from entering the
army. When the enemy heard of this they made a similar decree for
themselves.</p>
</div></div>
  <div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VI</head>
<head>Defeat and Death of Q. Caepio—Defeat of Sextus
Caesar—Sulla defeats the Marsians—Death of Judacilius—The
Etruscans and Umbrians admitted to Citizenship—Victories won by
Sulla—Fighting in Apulia—End of the Social War—Uprising against
Usury— A Praetor murdered</head>
<div n="44" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>There was no successor to Rutilius in the consulship for the remainder of the
year, as Sextus Caesar did not have leisure to go to the city and
hold the comitia. The Senate appointed G. Marius and Q. Caepio to
command the forces of Rutilius in the field. The opposing general, Q.
Pompaedius, fled as a pretended deserter to this Caepio.
He brought with him and gave as a pledge two slave babies, clad with the
purple-bordered garments of free-born children, pretending that they were
his own sons. As further confirmation of his good faith he brought masses of
lead plated with gold and silver. He urged Caepio to follow him in
all haste with his army and capture the hostile army while destitute of a
leader. Caepio was deceived and followed him. When they had arrived
at a place where an ambush had been laid, Pompaedius ran up to the
top of a hill as though he were searching for the enemy, and gave his own
men a signal. The latter sprang out of their concealment and cut
Caepio and most of his force in pieces. The Senate joined the rest
of Caepio’s army to that of Marius. </p>
</div><div n="45" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While Sextus Caesar was passing through a rocky defile with 30,000
foot and 5000 horse Marius Egnatius suddenly fell upon him and defeated him
in it. He retreated on a litter, as he was sick, to a certain stream where
there was only one bridge, and there he lost the greater part of his force
and the arms of the survivors. He escaped to Teanum with difficulty and
there he armed the remainder of his men as best he could.
Reënforcements were sent to him speedily and he marched to the
relief of Acerrae, which was still besieged by Papius, but when
their camps were pitched opposite each other neither of them dared to attack
the other. </p>
</div><div n="46" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Cornelius Sulla and Gaius Marius defeated the Marsians, who had attacked
them. They pursued the enemy vigorously as far as the walls enclosing their
vineyards. The Marsians scaled these walls with loss, but Marius and Sulla
did not deem it wise to follow them farther. Cornelius Sulla was encamped on
the other side of these enclosures and when he knew what had happened he
came out to meet the Marsians, as they tried to escape, and killed a great
number. More than 6000 Marsians were slain that day, and the arms of a still
greater number were captured by the Romans. The Marsians were rendered as
furious as wild beasts by this disaster. They armed their forces again and
prepared to march against the enemy, but did not dare to take the offensive
or to begin a battle. They are a very warlike race, and it is said that no
triumph was ever awarded for a victory over them except for this single
disaster. There had been up to this time a saying, <q rend="double">No triumph over Marsians
or without Marsians.</q> </p>
</div><div n="47" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Judacilius and T. Lafrenius and P. Ventidius united their forces near Mount
Falerinus and defeated Gnaeus Pompeius and pursued him to the city
of Firmum. Then they went different ways. Lafrenius besieged Pompeius, who
had shut himself up in Firmum. The latter armed his remaining forces, but
did not come to an engagement. Having learned that another army was
approaching, he sent Sulpicius around to take Lafrenius in the rear while he
made a sally in front. Battle was joined and both sides were having a
doubtful fight when Sulpicius set fire to the enemy’s camp. When the latter
saw this they fled to Asculum in disorder and without a general, for
Lafrenius had fallen in the battle. Pompeius then advanced and laid siege to
Asculum. </p>
</div><div n="48" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Asculum was the native town of Judacilius, and as he feared for its safety he
hastened to its relief with eight cohorts. He sent word beforehand to the
inhabitants that when they should see him advancing at a distance they
should make a sally against the besiegers, so that the enemy should be
attacked on both sides at once. The inhabitants were afraid to do so;
nevertheless Judacilius forced his way into the city through the midst of
the enemy with what followers he could get, and upbraided the citizens for
their cowardice and disobedience. As he despaired of saving the city he
first put to death all of his enemies, who had been at variance with him
before and who, out of jealousy, had prevented the people from obeying his
recent orders. Then he erected a funeral pile in the temple and placed a
couch upon it, and had a feast with his friends, and while the drinking-bout
was at its height he swallowed poison, threw himself on the pile, and
ordered his friends to set fire to it. Thus perished Judacilius, a man who
considered it glorious to die for his country. Sextus Caesar was
invested with the consular power by the Senate after his term of office had
expired. He attacked 20,000 of the enemy at some place while they were
changing camping-places, killed about 8000 of them, and captured the arms of
a much larger number. He died of a disease while pushing the long siege of
Asculum; the Senate appointed Gaius Baebius his successor. </p>
</div><div n="49" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While these events were transpiring on the Adriatic side of Italy, the
inhabitants of Etruria and Umbria and other neighboring peoples on the other
side of Rome heard of them and all were excited to revolt. The Senate,
fearing lest they should be surrounded by enemies for want of guards,
garrisoned the sea-coast from Cumae to the city with freedmen, who
were then for the first time enrolled in the army on account of the scarcity
of soldiers. The Senate also voted that those Italians who had adhered to
their alliance should be admitted to citizenship, which was the one thing
they all desired most. They sent this decree around among the Etruscans, who
gladly accepted the citizenship. By this favor the Senate made the faithful
more faithful, confirmed the wavering, and mollified their enemies by the
hope of similar treatment. The Romans did not enroll the new citizens in the
thirty-five existing tribes, lest they should outvote the old ones in the
elections, but incorporated them in ten new tribes, which voted last. So it
often happened that their vote was useless, since a majority was obtained
from the thirty-five tribes that voted first. This fact was either not
noticed by the Italians at the time or they were satisfied with what they
had gained, but it was observed later and became the source of a new
conflict. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 665</note>
</p>
</div><div n="50" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The insurgents along the Adriatic coast, before they learned of the change of
sentiment among the Etruscans, sent 15,000 men to their assistance by a long
and difficult road. Gnaeus Pompeius, who was now consul, fell upon
them and killed 5000 of them. The rest made their way homeward through a
trackless region, in a severe winter, living on acorns; and half of them
perished. The same winter Porcius Cato, the colleague of Pompeius, was
killed while fighting with the Marsians. While Sulla was encamped near the
Pompeiian mountains Lucius Cluentius pitched his camp in a contemptuous
manner at a distance of only three stades from him, Sulla did not tolerate
this insolence, but attacked Cluentius without waiting for his <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0089">89</date></note> own foragers to come in. He was worsted and put to
flight, but when he was reënforced by his foragers he turned and
defeated Cluentius. The latter then moved his camp to a greater distance.
Having received certain Gallic reenforcements he again drew near to Sulla
and just as the two armies were coming to an engagement a Gaul of enormous
size advanced and challenged any Roman to single combat. A Mauritanian
soldier of short stature accepted the challenge and killed him, whereupon
the Gauls became panic-stricken and fled. Cluentius’ line of battle was thus
broken and the remainder of his troops did not stand their ground, but fled,
in disorder to Nola. Sulla followed them and killed 3000 in the pursuit, and
as the inhabitants of Nola received them by only one gate, lest the enemy
should rush in with them, he killed about 20,000 more outside the walls and
among them Cluentius himself, who fell fighting bravely. </p>
</div><div n="51" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Then Sulla moved against the Hirpini and attacked the town of
Aeculanum. The inhabitants, who expected aid from the Lucanians
that very day, asked Sulla to give them time for consideration. He
understood the trick and gave them one hour, and meanwhile piled fagots
around their walls, which were made of wood, and at the expiration of the
hour set them on fire. They were terrified and surrendered the town. Sulla
plundered it because it had not been delivered up voluntarily but by
necessity. He spared the other towns that gave themselves up, and in this
way the entire population of the Hirpini was brought under subjection. Then
Sulla moved against the Samnites, not where Mutilus, the Samnite general,
guarded the roads, but by another circuitous route where his coming was not
expected. He fell upon them suddenly, killed many, and scattered the rest in
disorderly flight. Mutilus was wounded and took refuge with a few followers
in Aesernia. Sulla destroyed his camp and moved against Bovianum,
where the common council of the rebels was held. The city had three towers.
While the inhabitants were looking at Sulla from one of these he ordered a
detachment to capture whichever of the others they could, and to make a
signal by means of smoke. When the smoke was seen he made an attack in front
and, after a severe fight of three hours, took <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0090">90</date></note> the city.
These were the successes of Sulla during that summer. When winter came he
returned to Rome to solicit the consulship. </p>
</div><div n="52" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Gnaeus Pompeius brought the Marsians, the Marrucini, and the Vestini
under subjection. Gaius Cosconius, another Roman praetor, advanced
against and burned Salapia. He received the surrender of Cannae and
laid siege to Canusium. He had a severe fight with the Samnites, who came to
its relief. After great slaughter on both sides Cosconius was beaten and
retreated to Cannae. A river separated the two armies, and
Trebatius sent word to Cosconius either to come over to his side and fight
him, or to withdraw and let him cross. Cosconius withdrew, and while
Trebatius was crossing attacked him and got the better of him, and, while he
was flying toward the stream, killed 15,000 of his men. The remainder took
refuge with Trebatius in Canusium. Cosconius overran the territory of
Larinum, Venusia, and Asculum, and invaded that of the Pœdiculi,
and within two days received their surrender. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 666</note>
</p>
</div><div n="53" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Caecilius Metellus, his successor in the praetorship, <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0088">88</date></note> attacked the Apulians and overcame them in battle.
Pompaedius, one of the rebel generals, here lost his life. The
survivors joined Metellus separately. Such was the course of events
throughout Italy as regards the Social War, which had raged with violence
thus far and until the whole of Italy came into the Roman state except the
Lucanians and the Samnites. These also seem to have obtained what they
desired somewhat later. They were each enrolled in tribes of their own, like
those who had been admitted to citizenship before, so that they might not,
by being mingled with the old citizens, vote them down in the elections by
force of numbers. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R.
665</note>
</p>
</div><div n="54" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>About the same time dissensions arose in the city between debtors and
creditors, since the latter exacted the money due them with interest,
although an old law distinctly forbade lending on interest and imposed a
penalty upon any one doing so. It seems that the ancient Romans, like the
Greeks, abhorred the taking of interest on loans as something knavish, and
hard on the poor, and leading to contention and enmity; and by the same kind
of reasoning the Persians considered lending itself as having a tendency
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0089">89</date></note> to deceit and lying. But, since time had
sanctioned the practice of taking interest, the creditors demanded it
according to custom. The debtors, on the other hand, put off the payment by
causing war and civil commotion. Some indeed threatened to visit the legal
penalty on the interest-takers. The praetor Asellio, who had charge
of these matters, as he was not able to compose their differences by
persuasion, allowed them to proceed against each other in the courts, thus
bringing the conflict of law and custom before the judges. The lenders,
exasperated that the old law should be revived, killed the praetor
in the following manner. He was offering sacrifice to Castor and Pollux in
the forum, with a crowd standing around as was usual at such a ceremony. In
the first place somebody threw a stone at him. He dropped the libation-bowl
and ran toward the temple of Vesta. They got ahead of him and prevented him
from reaching the temple, and after he had fled into a certain tavern they
cut his throat. Many of his pursuers, thinking that he had taken refuge with
the Vestal virgins, ran in there, where it was not lawful for men to go.
Thus was Asellio, while serving as praetor, and pouring out the
libation, and wearing the sacred gilded vestments customary in such
ceremonies, slain at the second hour of the day, in the midst of the forum,
by the side of the sacrificial offerings. The Senate offered a reward of
money to any free person, and freedom to any slave, and impunity to any
accomplice, who should give testimony leading to the conviction of the
murderers of Asellio, but nobody gave any information. The money-lenders
covered up everything.</p>
</div></div>
  <div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VII</head>
<head>The Civil Wars of Marius and Sulla—The Command against
Mithridates—Sulla marches against the City—Captures it—Flight of the
Marians—Changes introduced by Sulla—Rome under Martial Law—Narrow
Escape of Marius—He passes over to Africa—Killing of Quintus
Pompeius</head>
<div n="55" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Hitherto the murders and seditions had been merely intestine squabbles.
Afterward the chiefs of factions assailed each other with great armies,
according to the usage of war, and the country lay as a prize between them.
The beginning and origin of these contentions came about directly after the
Social War, in this wise. When Mithridates, king of Pontus and of other
nations, invaded Bithynia and Phrygia and that part of Asia adjacent to
those countries, as I have related in the preceding book, the consul Sulla
was chosen by lot to the command of Asia and the Mithridatic war, but was
still in Rome. Marius thought that this would be an easy and lucrative war
and he desired the command of it. So he prevailed upon the tribune, Publius
Sulpicius, by many promises, to help him obtain it. He also led the new
Italian citizens, who had very little power in the elections, to hope that
they should be distributed among all the tribes—not putting forward
anything concerning his own advantage, but with the expectation of employing
them as loyal servants in his every <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 666</note> attempt. Sulpicius straightway brought
forward a law for <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0088">88</date></note> this purpose. If it were enacted Marius
and Sulpicius would have everything they wanted, because the new citizens
far outnumbered the old ones. The old citizens saw this and opposed the new
ones with all their might. They fought each other with sticks and stones,
and the evil increased continually. The consuls, becoming apprehensive, as
the day for voting on the law drew near, proclaimed a vacation of many days’
duration, such as was customary on festal occasions, in order to postpone
the voting and the danger. </p>
</div><div n="56" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Sulpicius would not wait for the vacation’s end. He ordered his faction to
come to the forum with concealed daggers and to do whatever the exigency
might require, and not to spare the consuls themselves upon occasion. When
everything was in readiness he denounced the vacation as illegal and ordered
the consuls, Cornelius Sulla and Quintus Pompeius, to put an end to it at
once, in order to proceed to the enactment of laws. A tumult arose, and
those who had been armed drew their daggers and threatened to kill the
consuls, who were making opposition. Finally Pompeius escaped secretly and
Sulla withdrew on the pretext of taking advice. In the meantime the son of
Pompeius, who was the son-in-law of Sulla, and who was speaking his mind
rather freely, was killed by the Sulpicians. Presently Sulla returned and
annulled the vacation, but hurried away to Capua, where his army was
stationed, in order to cross over to Asia to take command of the war against
Mithridates, for he knew nothing as yet of the designs against himself. As
the vacation was annulled and Sulla had left the city, Sulpicius enacted his
law, and Marius, for whose sake it was done, was forthwith chosen commander
of the war against Mithridates in place of Sulla. </p>
</div><div n="57" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Sulla heard of this he resolved to decide the question by war. He called
the army together in a conference. They were eager for the war against
Mithridates because it promised much plunder, and they feared that Marius
would enlist other soldiers instead of themselves. Sulla spoke of the
indignity put upon him by Sulpicius and Marius, and while he did not openly
allude to anything else (for he did not dare as yet to mention this kind of
a war), he urged them to be ready to obey his orders. They understood what
he meant, and as they feared lest they should miss the campaign they spoke
boldly what Sulla had in his mind, and told him to be of good courage, and
to lead them to Rome. Sulla was overjoyed and led six legions thither
forthwith, but all of his superior officers, except one quaestor,
left him and hastened to the city, because they would not submit to the idea
of leading an army against their country. Envoys met him on the road and
asked him why he was marching with armed forces against his country.
 <q rend="double"><hi rend="ital">To</hi> deliver her from her tyrants,</q> he replied. He gave the same
answer to a second and a third embassy that came to him, one after another,
but he announced to them finally that the Senate and Marius and Sulpicius
might meet him in the Campus Martius if they liked, and that he would do
whatever might be agreed upon after consultation. As he was approaching, his
colleague, Pompeius, came to meet him and praised him for what he had done,
for Pompeius was delighted, and coöperated with him in every way.
As Marius and Sulpicius needed some short interval for preparation, they
sent other messengers, in the guise of envoys from the Senate, directing him
not to move his camp nearer than forty stades from the city until they could
consider of the business in hand. Sulla and Pompeius understood their game
perfectly and promised to comply, but as soon as the envoys were returning
they followed them. </p>
</div><div n="58" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Sulla took possession of the Cœlian gate and of the adjoining wall
with one legion of soldiers, and Pompeius occupied the Colline gate with
another. A third advanced to the Sublician bridge, and a fourth remained on
guard in front of the walls. With the remainder Sulla entered the city,
being in appearance and in fact an enemy. The inhabitants round about tried
to fight him off by hurling missiles from the roofs until he threatened to
burn the houses; then they desisted. Marius and Sulpicius went, with some
forces they had hastily armed, to meet the invaders near the
Aesquiline forum, and here a battle took place between the
contending parties, the first that was regularly fought in Rome with trumpet
and signal under the rules of war, and not at all in the similitude of a
faction fight. To such extremity of evil had the recklessness of party
strife progressed among them. Sulla’s forces were beginning to waver when
Sulla seized a standard and exposed himself to danger in the foremost ranks.
Out of regard for their general and fear of ignominy if they should abandon
their standard, they rallied at once. Sulla ordered up fresh troops from his
camp and sent others around by the socalled Suburran road to take the enemy
in the rear. The Marians fought feebly against these new-comers, and as they
feared lest they should be surrounded they called to their aid the other
citizens who were still fighting from the houses, and proclaimed freedom to
slaves who would share their labors. As nobody came forward they fell into
utter despair and fled at once out of the city, together with those of the
nobility who had coöperated with them. </p>
</div><div n="59" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Sulla advanced to the so-called Via Sacra and there, in sight of everybody,
punished certain soldiers who had plundered persons on the road. He
stationed guards at intervals throughout the city, he and Pompeius keeping
watch by night. Each kept moving about his own command to see that no
calamity was brought about either by the frightened people or by the
victorious troops: They summoned the people to an assembly at daybreak and
lamented the condition of the republic, which had been so long given over to
demagogues, and said that they had done what they had done as a matter of
necessity. They proposed that no question should ever again be brought
before the people which had not been previously considered by the Senate, an
ancient practice which had been abandoned long ago. Also that the voting
should not be by tribes, but by centuries, as King Servius Tullius had
ordained. They thought that by these two measures—namely, that no law
should be brought before the people unless it had been previously before the
Senate, and that the voting should be controlled by the well-to-do and
sober-minded rather than by the pauper and reckless classes—there would no
longer be any starting-point for civil discord. They proposed many other
measures for curtailing the power of the tribunes, which had become
extremely tyrannical. They enrolled 300 of the best citizens at once in the
list of senators, who had been reduced at that time to a very small number
and had fallen into contempt for that reason. They annulled all the acts
performed by Sulpicius after the vacation had been proclaimed by the
consuls, as being illegal. </p>
</div><div n="60" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus the seditions proceeded from strife and contention to murder, and from
murder to open war, and now the first army of her own citizens had invaded
Rome as a hostile country.<note resp="translator">This
is what Mommsen aptly terms <q rend="double">the interference of the sabre with the
constitutional rule of the bludgeon.</q></note> From this time the civil
dissensions were decided only by the arbitrament of arms. There were
frequent attacks upon the city and battles before the walls and other
calamities incident to war. Henceforth there was no restraint upon violence
either from the sense of shame, or regard for law, institutions, or country.
Now Sulpicius, who still held the office of tribune, together with Marius,
who had been consul six times, and his son Marius, also Publius Cethegus,
Junius Brutus, Gnaeus and Quintus Granius, Publius Albinovanus,
Marcus Laetorius, and others with them, about twelve in number,
fled from Rome, because they had stirred up the sedition, had borne arms
against the consuls, had incited slaves to insurrection, had been voted
enemies of the Roman people, and anybody meeting them had been authorized to
kill them with impunity or to drag them before the consuls, and their goods
had been confiscated. Detectives were in pursuit of these men. They caught
Sulpicius and killed him. </p>
</div><div n="61" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Marius escaped them and fled to Minturnae without a companion or a
servant. While he was resting in a secluded house the magistrates of the
city, whose fears were excited by the proclamation of the Roman people, but
who hesitated to be the murderers of a man who had been six times consul and
had performed so many brilliant exploits, sent a Gaul who was living there
to kill him with a sword. It is said that as the Gaul was approaching the
pallet of Marius in the dusk he thought he saw the gleam and flash of fire
darting from his eyes, and that Marius rose from his bed and shouted to him
in a thundering voice, <q rend="double">Do you dare to kill Gaius Marius?</q> The Gaul turned
and fled out of doors like a madman, exclaiming, <q rend="double">I cannot kill Gaius
Marius.</q> As the magistrates had come to their previous decision with
reluctance, so now a kind of religious awe came over them as they remembered
the prophecy uttered while he was a boy, that he should be consul seven
times. It was said that while he was a boy seven young eaglets alighted on
his breast, and that the soothsayers predicted that he would attain the
highest office seven times. </p>
</div><div n="62" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Bearing these things in mind and believing that the Gaul had been inspired
with fear by divine influence, the magistrates of Minturnae sent
Marius out of the town forthwith, to seek safety wherever he could. As he
knew that Sulla was searching for him and that horsemen were pursuing him,
he moved toward the sea by unfrequented roads and came to a hut where he
rested, covering himself up with leaves. Hearing a noise, he concealed
himself more carefully with the leaves. Hearing a somewhat louder noise, he
rushed to the boat of an old fisherman, overpowered him, leaped into it,
and, although a storm was raging, he cut the rope, spread the sail, and
committed himself to chance. He was driven to an island where he found a
ship navigated by his own friends, and sailed thence to Africa. He was
prohibited from landing there by the governor, Sextius, because he was an
enemy, and he passed the winter in his ship a little beyond the province of
Africa, along the shore of Numidia. While he was sailing thither he was
joined by Cethegus, Granius, Albinovanus, Laetorius, and others,
including the son of Marius himself, who had gained tidings of his approach.
They had fled from Rome to Hiempsal, prince of Numidia, and now they had run
away from him, fearing lest they should be delivered up. They were ready to
do just as Sulla had done, that is, to master their country by force, but as
they had no army they waited for some opportunity. </p>
</div><div n="63" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In Rome Sulla, who had been the first one to seize the city by force of arms,
and was now able perhaps to wield supreme power, having rid himself of his
enemies, desisted from violence of his own accord. He sent his army forward
to Capua and resumed his functions as consul. The faction under banishment,
especially the rich ones, and many wealthy women, who now found a respite
from the terror of arms, bestirred themselves for the return of their male
relatives from exile. They spared neither pains nor expense to this end,
even conspiring against the persons of the consuls when they thought they
could not secure the recall of their friends while the consuls survived.
Sulla’s army furnished ample protection for himself even after he should
cease to be consul, since he had been voted commander of the war against
Mithridates. The people commiserated the fears of the other consul, Quintus
Pompeius, for his personal safety, and gave him the command of Italy and of
the army appertaining to it, which was then under Gnaeus Pompeius.
When the latter learned this fact he was greatly displeased. Nevertheless he
received Quintus in the camp, and, after transacting the necessary business
with him the following day, withdrew for a short time as a private person,
but a little later a crowd that had collected around the consul under
pretence of listening to him killed him. After the guilty ones had fled,
Gnaeus came to the camp in a high state of indignation over the
killing of a consul contrary to law. Notwithstanding his displeasure he
forthwith resumed his command over them.<note resp="translator">The <title>Epitome</title> of Livy (lxxvii.) says that
Gnaeus Pompeius the proconsul procured the murder of Quintus
Pompeius the consul, when the latter came to supersede him.</note>
</p>
</div></div>
  <div n="8" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VIII</head>
<head>Attempted Revolution of Cinna—Cinna expelled from the City—Raises an
Army and returns—Return of Marius—They besiege Rome, and cut off its
Supplies—The City surrenders—Massacre of Citizens—Heads exposed in
the Forum—Death of Marcus Antonius the Orator—Sulla’s Friends killed
and his Property confiscated—Death of Merula and Catulus—Death of
Marius</head>
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R.</note>
<div n="64" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the murder of Pompeius became known in <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C.</note> the city, Sulla became apprehensive for his own
safety and was surrounded by friends wherever he went, and had them <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 667</note> with him even by
night. He did not remain long in the <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0087">87</date></note> city, but went to
the army at Capua and from thence to Asia. The friends of the exiles,
encouraged by Cinna, Sulla’s successor in the consulship, excited the new
citizens in favor of the scheme of Marius, that they should be distributed
among the old tribes, so that they should not be powerless by reason of
voting last. This was preliminary to the recall of Marius and his friends.
Although the old citizens resisted with all their might, Cinna
coöperated with the new ones. It was supposed that he had been
bribed with 300 talents to do this. The other consul, Octavius, sided with
the old citizens. The partisans of Cinna took possession of the forum with
concealed daggers, and with loud cries demanded that they should be
distributed among all the tribes. The more reputable part of the plebeians
adhered to Octavius, and they also carried daggers. While Octavius was still
at home awaiting the result, the news was brought to him that the majority
of the tribunes had vetoed the proposed action, but that the new citizens
had started a riot, drawn their daggers on the street, and assaulted the
opposing tribunes on the rostra. When Octavius heard this he ran down
through the Via Sacra with a very dense mass of men, burst into the forum
like a torrent, pushed through the midst of the crowd, and separated them.
He struck terror into them, pushed on to the temple of Castor and Pollux,
and drove Cinna away. His companions fell upon the new citizens without
orders, killed many of them, put the rest to flight, and pursued them to the
city gates. </p>
</div><div n="65" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Cinna, who had been emboldened by the numbers of the new citizens to think
that he should conquer, seeing the victory won contrary to his expectation
by the bravery of the few, ran through the city calling the slaves to his
assistance by an offer of freedom. As none responded he hastened to the
towns near by, which had lately been admitted to Roman citizenship, Tibur,
Praeneste, and the rest as far as Nola, inciting them all to
revolution and collecting money for the purposes of war. While Cinna was
making these preparations and plans, certain senators of his party joined
him, among them Gaius Milo, Quintus Sertorius, and Gaius Marius the younger.
The Senate decreed that since Cinna had left the city in danger while
holding the office of consul, and had offered freedom to the slaves, he
should no longer be consul, or even a citizen, and elected in his stead
Lucius Merula, the priest of Jupiter (<foreign xml:lang="lat">flamen Dialis</foreign>). It
is said that this priest alone wore the flamen’s cap at all times, the
others wearing it only during sacrifices. Cinna proceeded to Capua, where
there was another Roman army, the officers of which, and the senators who
were present, he courted. He went to meet them as consul in an assembly,
where he laid down the fasces as though he were a private citizen, and
shedding tears, said, <q rend="double">From you, citizens, I received this authority. The
people voted it to me; the Senate has taken it away from me without your
consent. Although I am the sufferer by this wrong I grieve amid my own
troubles equally for your sakes. What need is there that we should solicit
the favor of the tribes in the elections hereafter? What need have we of
you? Where will be your power in the assemblies, in the elections, in the
choice of consuls? If you do not confirm what you bestow, you will be robbed
whenever you give your decision.</q> </p>
</div><div n="66" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>He said this to stir them up, and after exciting much pity for himself he
rent his garments, leaped down from the rostra, and threw himself on the
ground before them, where he lay a long time. With tears in their eyes they
raised him up; they restored him to the curule chair; they lifted up the
fasces and bade him be of good cheer, as he was consul still, and lead them
wherever he would. At their instance the officers came forward and took the
military oath to support Cinna, and administered it each to the soldiers
under him. When he had been confirmed in this way he traversed the allied
cities and stirred them up also, because it was on their account chiefly
that this misfortune had happened to him. They furnished him both money and
soldiers; and many others, even of the aristocratic party in Rome, to whom a
stable form of government was irksome, came and joined him. While Cinna was
thus occupied, the consuls, Octavius and Merula, fortified the city with
trenches, repaired the walls, and planted engines on them. To raise an army
they sent around to the towns that were still faithful and also to the
neighboring Gauls. They also summoned Gnaeus Pompeius, the
proconsul who commanded the army on the Adriatic, to come in haste to the
aid of his country. </p>
</div><div n="67" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompeius came and encamped before the Colline gate. Cinna advanced against
him and encamped near him. When Gaius Marius heard of these transactions he
sailed to Etruria with his fellow-exiles and about 500 slaves who had joined
their masters from Rome. Filthy and longhaired, he marched through the towns
presenting a pitiable appearance, descanting on his battles, his victories
over the Cimbri, and his six consulships; and what was extremely pleasing to
them, promising, and also seeming, to be faithful to their interests in the
matter of the voting. In this way he collected 6000 Etruscans and joined
Cinna, who received him gladly by reason of their common interest in the
present enterprise. After their armies were joined they encamped on the
banks of the Tiber and divided their forces in three parts: Cinna and Carbo
opposite the city, Sertorius above it, and Marius toward the sea. The two
latter threw bridges across the river in order to cut off the city’s
food-supply. Marius captured Ostia and plundered it. Cinna sent a force and
captured Ariminum in order to prevent an army coming to the city from the
subject Gauls. </p>
</div><div n="68" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The consuls were alarmed. They needed more troops, but they were unable to
call Sulla because he had already crossed over to Asia. They ordered
Caecilius Metellus, who was carrying on the remainder of the Social
War against the Samnites, to make peace on the best terms he could, and come
to the rescue of his beleaguered country. Metellus would not agree to what
the Samnites demanded, and when Marius heard of this he made an engagement
with them to grant all that they asked from Metellus. In this way the
Samnites became allies of Marius. Appius Claudius, a military tribune, who
had command of the defences of Rome at the hill called the Janiculum, had
once received a favor from Marius which the latter now reminded him of, in
consequence of which he admitted him into the city, opening a gate for him
at about daybreak. Then Marius admitted Cinna. They were thrust out by
Octavius and Pompeius, who attacked them together, but a severe
thunder-storm broke upon the camp of Pompeius, and he was killed by
lightning together with others of the nobility. </p>
</div><div n="69" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After Marius had stopped the passage of food-supplies from the sea, or by way
of the river above, he hastened to attack the neighboring towns where grain
was stored for the Romans. He fell upon their garrisons unexpectedly and
captured Antium, Aricia, Lanuvium, and others. There were some also that
were delivered up to him by treachery. Having cut off their supplies by land
in this manner, he advanced boldly against Rome, by the so-called Appian
Way, before any other supplies were brought to them by another route. He and
Cinna, and their lieutenant-generals, Carbo and Sertorius, halted at a
distance of 100 stades from the city and went into camp. Octavius, Crassus,
and Metellus had taken position against them at the Alban Mount, where they
observed the enemy’s movements. Although they considered themselves superior
in bravery and numbers, they hesitated to risk hastily their country’s fate
on the hazard of a single battle. Cinna sent heralds around the city to
offer freedom to slaves who would desert to him, and forthwith a large
number did desert. The Senate was alarmed. Anticipating the most serious
consequences from the people if the scarcity of corn should be protracted,
it changed its mind and sent envoys to Cinna to treat for peace. The latter
asked them whether they had come to see him as a consul or as a private
citizen. They were at a loss for an answer and went back to the city; and
now a large number of freemen flocked to Cinna, some from fear of famine and
others because they had been previously favorable to his party and had been
waiting to see which way the scales would turn. </p>
</div><div n="70" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Now Cinna began to despise his enemies and drew near to the wall, halting at
the distance of a stone’s throw, where he encamped. Octavius and his party
were undecided and fearful, and hesitated to attack him on account of the
desertions and the negotiations. The Senate was greatly perplexed and
considered it a dreadful thing to depose Lucius Merula, the priest of
Jupiter, who had been chosen consul in place of Cinna, and who had done
nothing wrong in his office. Yet on account of the impending danger it
reluctantly sent envoys to Cinna again, and this time as consul. They no
longer expected favorable terms, so they only asked that Cinna should swear
to them that he would abstain from bloodshed. He refused to take the oath,
but he promised nevertheless that he would not willingly be the cause of
anybody’s death. He directed, however, that Octavius, who had gone around
and entered the city by another gate, should keep away from the forum lest
anything should befall him against Cinna’s will. This answer he delivered to
the envoys from a high platform in his character as consul. Marius stood
beside the curule chair silent, but showed by the asperity of his
countenance how much murder he would commit. When the Senate had accepted
these terms and had invited Cinna and Marius to enter (for it was understood
that all the things that Cinna had subscribed to were the doings of Marius),
the latter said with a scornful smile that it was not lawful for the
banished to enter. Forthwith the tribunes voted to repeal the decree of
banishment against him and all the others who were expelled under the
consulship of Sulla. </p>
</div><div n="71" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Accordingly Cinna and Marius entered the city and everybody received them
with fear. Straightway they began to plunder without restraint the goods of
those who were supposed to be of the opposite party. Cinna and Marius had
sworn to Octavius, and the augurs and soothsayers had predicted, that he
would suffer no harm, yet his friends advised him to fly. He replied that he
would never desert the city while he was consul. So he withdrew from the
forum to the Janiculum with the nobility and what was left of his army,
where he occupied the curule chair and wore his robes of office, attended by
lictors as a consul. Here he was attacked by Censorinus with a body of
horse, and again his friends and the soldiers who stood by him urged him to
fly and brought him a horse, but he disdained even to arise, and awaited
death. Censorinus cut off his head and carried it to Cinna, and it was
suspended in the forum in front of the rostra, the first head of a consul
that was so exposed. After him the heads of others who were slain were
suspended there. This shocking custom, which began with Octavius, was not
discontinued, but was handed down to subsequent intestine massacres. Now the
victors sent out spies to search for their enemies of the senatorial and
equestrian orders. After the knights were killed no further attention was
paid to them, but all the heads of senators were exposed in front of the
rostra. Neither reverence for the gods, nor the indignation of men, nor the
fear of odium for their acts existed any longer among them. After committing
savage deeds they turned to hideous sights. They killed remorselessly and
severed the necks of men already dead, and they paraded these horrors before
the public eye, either to inspire fear and terror, or for a monstrous
spectacle. </p>
</div><div n="72" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Gaius Julius and Lucius Julius, two brothers, Atilius Serranus, Publius
Lentulus, Gaius Numatorius, and Marcus Baebius were arrested in the
street and killed. Crassus was pursued with his son. He anticipated the
pursuers by killing his son, but was himself killed by them. Marcus
Antonius, the orator, fled to a certain country place, where he was
concealed and entertained by the farmer, who sent his slave to a tavern for
wine of a better quality than he was in the habit of buying. The innkeeper
asked him why he wanted the better quality. The slave whispered the reason
to him, bought the wine, and went back. The seller ran and told Marius. When
Marius heard this he sprang up with joy as though he would rush to do the
deed himself, but he was restrained by his friends. A tribune was despatched
to the house, who sent some soldiers upstairs, whom Antonius, a delightful
speaker, entertained with a long discourse. He moved their pity by
recounting many and various things, until the tribune, who was at a loss to
know what had happened, rushed into the house and, finding his soldiers
listening to Antonius, killed him while he was still addressing them, and
sent his head to Marius. </p>
</div><div n="73" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Cornutus concealed himself in a hut and was saved by his slaves in an
ingenious way. They found a dead body and placed it on a funeral pile, and
when the searchers came they set fire to it and said that they were burning
the body of their master, who had hanged himself. In this way he was saved
by his slaves. Quintus Ancharius watched his opportunity till Marius was
about to offer sacrifice in the Capitol, hoping that the temple would be a
more propitious place for him. But when he approached and saluted Marius,
the latter, who was just beginning the sacrifice, ordered the guards to kill
him in the Capitol forthwith; and his head, with that of the orator
Antonius, and those of others who had been consuls and praetors,
was exposed in the forum. Burial was not permitted to any of the slain. The
bodies of such men as these were torn in pieces by birds and dogs. There was
also much private and irresponsible murder committed by the factions upon
each other. There were banishments, and confiscations of property, and
depositions from office, and a repeal of the laws enacted during Sulla’s
consulship. All of Sulla’s friends were put to death, his house was razed to
the ground, his property confiscated, and himself voted a public enemy.
Search was made for his wife and children, but they escaped. Altogether no
sort of calamity was wanting, either general or particular. </p>
</div><div n="74" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In addition to the foregoing and under the similitude of legal authority, and
after so many had been put to death without trial, accusers were suborned to
make false charges against Merula, the priest of Jupiter, who was hated
because he had been the successor of Cinna in the consulship, although he
had committed no other fault. Accusation was also brought against Lutatius
Catulus, who had been the colleague of Marius in the war against the Cimbri,
and whose life Marius once saved. It was charged that he had been very
ungrateful to Marius and was bitter against him when he was banished. These
men were put under secret surveillance, and when the day for holding court
arrived were summoned to trial (the proper way was to put the accused under
arrest after they had been cited four times at certain fixed intervals), but
Merula had opened his own veins, and a tablet lying at his side showed that
when he cut his veins he had removed his flamen’s cap, for it was accounted
a sin for the priest to wear it at his death. Catulus suffocated himself
with burning charcoal in a chamber newly plastered and still moist. So these
two men perished. The slaves who had joined Cinna in answer to his
proclamation and had thereupon been freed and were at this time enrolled in
the army by Cinna himself, broke into and plundered houses, and killed
persons whom they met on the street. Some of them attacked their own masters
particularly. After Cinna had forbidden this several times, but without
avail, he surrounded them with his Gallic soldiery one night while they were
taking their rest, and killed them all. Thus did the slaves receive fit
punishment for their repeated treachery to their masters. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 668</note>
</p>
</div><div n="75" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The following year Cinna was chosen consul for the <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0086">86</date></note> second
time, and Marius for the seventh time; to whom, notwithstanding his
banishment and proscription, the augury of the seven young eaglets was yet
fulfilled. But he died in the first month of his consulship, while forming
all sorts of terrible designs against Sulla. Cinna caused Valerius Flaccus
to be chosen in his place and sent him to Asia, and when Flaccus lost his
life Cinna chose Carbo as his successor.</p>
</div></div>
  <div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER IX</head>
<head>Sulla ends the Mithridatic War—Prepares to return to Rome—Death of
Cinna—Negotiations with Sulla—Sulla in Italy—Terror in the
City—Marshalling the Forces against Sulla—Omens and Prodigies—Battle
at Canusium</head>
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 669</note>
<div n="76" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Sulla now hastened his return to meet his enemies, having quickly finished
all his business with Mithridates, as I have already related. Within less
than three years he had killed 160,000 men, recovered Greece, Macedonia,
Ionia, Asia, and many other countries that Mithridates had previously
occupied, taken the king’s fleet away from him, and from such vast
possessions restricted him to his paternal kingdom alone. He returned with a
large and well-disciplined army, devoted to him and elated by its exploits.
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0085">85</date></note> He had abundance of ships, money, and apparatus
suitable for all emergencies, and was an object of terror to his enemies.
Carbo and Cinna were in such fear of him that they despatched emissaries to
all parts of Italy to collect money, soldiers, and supplies. They took their
leading citizens into friendly intercourse and appealed especially to the
newly created citizens of the towns, pretending that it was on their account
that they were threatened with the present danger. They hastily repaired the
ships, and recalled those that were in Sicily, guarded the coast, and, with
fear and trembling, made rapid preparations in every way. </p>
</div><div n="77" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Sulla wrote to the Senate in a tone of superiority concerning himself. He
recounted what he had done in Africa in the Jugurthine war while he was
still quaestor, what he had done as lieutenant in the Cimbric war,
as praetor in Cilicia and in the Social war, and as consul. Most of
all he dwelt upon his recent victories in the Mithridatic war, enumerating
to them the many nations that had been under Mithridates and that he had
recovered for the Romans. Of nothing did he make more account than that
those who had been banished from Rome by Cinna had fled to him, and that he
had received the helpless ones and supported them in their affliction. In
return for which he said that he had been declared a public enemy by his
foes, his house had been destroyed, his friends put to death, and his wife
and children had with difficulty made their escape to him. He would be there
presently to take vengeance, for them and for the entire city, upon the
guilty ones. He assured the other citizens, and the new citizens, that he
made no complaint against them. When the contents of the letters became
known fear fell upon all, and they began sending messengers to reconcile him
with his enemies and to tell him in advance that if he wanted any security
he should write to the Senate at once. They ordered Cinna and Carbo to cease
recruiting soldiers until Sulla’s answer should be received. They promised
to do so, but as soon as the messengers had gone they proclaimed themselves
consuls for the ensuing year so that they need not come back to the city
directly to hold the election. They traversed Italy, collecting soldiers
whom they carried across by detachments on shipboard to Liburnia,<note resp="translator">On the northern coast of
Illyria.</note> as they expected to meet Sulla there. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 670</note>
</p>
</div><div n="78" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The first detachment had a prosperous voyage. The <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0084">84</date></note> next one
encountered a storm and those who reached land went home immediately, as
they did not relish the prospect of fighting their fellow-citizens. When the
rest learned this they refused to cross to Liburnia. Cinna was angry and
called them to an assembly in order to coerce them. They, angry also and
ready to defend themselves, assembled. One of the lictors, who was clearing
the road for Cinna, struck somebody who was in the way and one of the
soldiers struck the lictor. Cinna ordered the arrest of the offender,
whereupon a clamor rose on all sides, stones were thrown at him, and those
who were near him drew their swords and stabbed him. So Cinna also perished
during his consulship. Carbo recalled those who had been sent over by ship
to Liburnia. As he was solicitous about the present state of things, he did
not go back to the city, although the tribunes summoned him with urgency to
hold an election for the choice of a colleague. When they threatened to
reduce him to the rank of a private citizen he came back and ordered the
holding of the consular election, but as the omens were unfavorable he
postponed it to another day. When that day came lightning struck the temples
of Luna and of Ceres; so the augurs prorogued the comitia beyond the summer
solstice, and Carbo remained the sole consul. </p>
</div><div n="79" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Sulla answered those who came to him from the Senate, saying that he would
never be on friendly terms with the men who had committed such crimes. Still
he would not prevent the city from extending clemency to them. As for
security he said that, as he had a devoted army, he could better furnish
lasting security to them, and to those who had fled to his camp, than they
to him; whereby it was made plain in a single sentence that he would not
disband his army, but was contemplating the exercise of supreme power. He
demanded of them his former dignity, his property, and the sacerdotal
office, and that they should restore to him in full measure whatever other
honors he had previously held. He sent some of his own men with the Senate’s
messengers to confer about these matters. As soon as they learned from the
Brundusians that Cinna was dead and that Rome was in an unsettled state,
they went back to Sulla without transacting their business. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 671</note> He started with
five legions of Italian troops and <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0083">83</date></note> 6000 horse, to whom
he added some other forces from the Peloponnesus and Macedonia, in all about
40,000 men. He led them from the Piraeus to Patrae, and
then sailed from Patrae to Brundusium in 
1600 ships. The Brundusians received him without a fight, for
which favor he afterward gave them exemption from customs-duties, which they
enjoy to this day. Then he put his army in motion and went forward. </p>
</div><div n="80" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>He was met on the road by Caecilius Metellus Pius, who had been
chosen some time before to finish up the Social War, but who did not return
to the. city for fear of Cinna and Marius. He had been awaiting the turn of
events in Liguria, and now offered himself as a volunteer ally with the
force under his command, as he was still a proconsul; for those who have
been chosen to this office retain it till they come back to Rome. After
Metellus, came Pompey, who not long afterward was surnamed the Great, son of
the Pompeius who was killed by lightning and who was supposed to be
unfriendly to Sulla. The son removed this suspicion by coming with a legion
which he had collected from the territory of Picenum on the reputation of
his father, who had been very influential there. A little later he recruited
two more legions and became Sulla’s most useful right-hand man in these
affairs. So Sulla held him in honor, though still very young; and they say
he rose at the entrance of none other than this youth. After the war was
finished Sulla sent him to Africa to drive out the party of Carbo and to
restore Hiempsal (who had been expelled by the Numidians) to his kingdom.
For this service Sulla allowed him a triumph over the Numidians, although he
was under age, and was still in the equestrian order. He took his start to
greatness from this beginning, and was sent against Sertorius in Spain and
later against Mithridates in Pontus. Cethegus also joined Sulla, although
with Cinna and Marius he had been violently hostile to him and had been
driven out of the city with them. He was now a suppliant, and offered his
services to Sulla in any capacity he might desire. </p>
</div><div n="81" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Sulla now had plenty of soldiers and a sufficient number of friends of the
higher orders, whom he used as lieutenants. He and Metellus, who were both
proconsuls, marched in advance, for it seems that Sulla, who had been
appointed proconsul against Mithridates, had at no time laid down his
command, although he had been voted a public enemy at the instance of Cinna.
Now Sulla moved against his enemies with a most intense yet concealed
hatred. The people in the city, who had formed a pretty fair judgment of the
character of the man, and who remembered his former attack and capture of
the city, and who took into account the decrees they had proclaimed against
him, and who had witnessed the destruction of his house, the confiscation of
his property, the killing of his friends, and the narrow escape of his
family, were in a state of terror. Conceiving that there was no middle
ground between victory and utter destruction, they united with the consuls
to resist Sulla, but with trepidation. They despatched messengers throughout
Italy to collect soldiers, provisions, and money, and, as in cases of
extreme peril, they omitted nothing that zeal and earnestness could suggest. </p>
</div><div n="82" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Gaius Norbanus and Lucius Scipio, who were then the consuls, and with them
Carbo, who had been consul the previous year (all of them moved by equal
hatred of Sulla and more fearful than others because they knew that they
were more to blame for what had been done), levied the best possible army
from the city, obtained an additional one from Italy, and marched against
Sulla in detachments. They had 200 cohorts of 500 men each at first, and
their forces were considerably augmented afterward. The sympathies of the
people were much in favor of the consuls, because the action of Sulla, who
was marching against his country, seemed to be that of an enemy, while that
of the consuls, even if they were working for themselves, was ostensibly the
cause of the republic. Many persons, too, who knew that they had shared the
guilt of the consuls, and who were believed to share their fears,
coöperated with them. They knew very well that Sulla was not
meditating merely prevention, correction, and alarm for them, but
destruction, death, confiscation, and complete extermination. In this they
were not mistaken, for the war ruined everything. From 10,000 to 20,000 men
were slain in a single battle more than once. Fifty thousand on both sides
lost their lives around the city, and to the survivors Sulla was unsparing
in severity, both to individuals and to communities, until, finally, he made
himself the undisputed master of the whole Roman government, so far as he
wished or cared to be. </p>
</div><div n="83" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>It seems, too, that divine Providence foretold to them the results of this
war. Sights terrible and unexpected were observed by many, both in public
and in private, throughout all Italy. Ancient, awe-inspiring oracles were
remembered. Many monstrous things happened. A mule gave birth to a colt. A
pregnant woman was delivered of a viper instead of a baby. There was a
severe earthquake divinely sent and some of the temples in Rome were thrown
down (the Romans gave altogether too much attention to such things). The
Capitol, that had been built by the kings 400 years before, burned down, and
nobody could discover the cause of the fire. All things seemed to point to a
succession of slaughters, to the conquest of Italy and of the Romans
themselves, to the capture of the city, and a change in the form of
government. </p>
</div><div n="84" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>This war began as soon as Sulla arrived at Brundusium, which was in the 174th
Olympiad. Considering the magnitude of the work accomplished, its length was
not great, compared with such wars in general, since the combatants rushed
upon each other with the fury of private enemies. For this reason greater
and more distressing calamities than usual befell the eager participants in
a short space of time. Nevertheless the war lasted three years in Italy
alone, until Sulla had secured the supreme power, but in Spain it continued
even after Sulla’s death. Battles, skirmishes, sieges, and fighting of all
kinds were numerous throughout Italy, both regular engagements under the
generals and by detachments, and all were noteworthy. The greatest and most
remarkable of them I shall mention in this book. First of all Sulla and
Metellus fought a battle against Norbanus at Canusium and killed 6000 of his
men, while Sulla’s loss was seventy, but many of his men were wounded.
Norbanus retreated to Capua.</p>
</div></div>
  <div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER X</head>
<head>Desertions to Sulla—Sertorius goes to Spain—Success of Sulla’s
Generals—Continued Victories of Sulla—Murders in Rome—Young Marius
besieged in Praeneste—More Desertions to Sulla—The Consul
Carbo flees to Africa—Sulla’s Victory at the City Gates—Surrender of
Praeneste—Suicide of Young Marius</head>
<div n="85" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While Sulla and Metellus were near Teanum, L. Scipio advanced against them
with another army which was very downhearted and longed for peace. The
Sullan faction knew this and sent envoys to Scipio to negotiate, not because
they hoped or desired to come to an agreement, but because they expected to
create dissensions in Scipio’s army, which was in a state of dejection. In
this they succeeded. Scipio took hostages for the armistice and marched down
to the plain. Only three from each side came to the conference, hence what
passed between them is not known. It seems that during the armistice Scipio
sent Sertorius to his colleague, Norbanus, to communicate with him
concerning the negotiation and that there was a cessation of hostilities
while they were waiting for an answer. Sertorius on his way took possession
of Suessa, which had espoused the side of Sulla, and Sulla made complaint of
this to Scipio. The latter, either because he was privy to the affair or
because he did not know what answer to make concerning the strange act of
Sertorius, sent back Sulla’s hostages. His army blamed the consuls for the
unjustifiable seizure of Suessa during the armistice and for the surrender
of the hostages, who were not demanded back, and made a secret agreement
with Sulla to go over to him if he would draw nearer. This he did and
straightway they all went over <emph>en masse,</emph> so that the
consul, Scipio, and his son Lucius, alone of the whole army, were left
nonplussed in their tent, where they were captured by Sulla. That Scipio was
not aware of a conspiracy of this kind, embracing his whole army, seems to
me inexcusable in a general. </p>
</div><div n="86" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Sulla was unable to induce Scipio to change, he sent him away with his
son unharmed. He also sent other envoys to Norbanus at Capua to open
negotiations, either because he was apprehensive of the result (since the
greater part of Italy still adhered to the consuls), or in order to play the
same game on him that he had played on Scipio. As nobody came back and no
answer was returned (for it seems that Norbanus feared lest he should be
accused by his army in the same way that Scipio had been), Sulla again
advanced, devastating all hostile territory. Norbanus did the same thing on
other roads. Carbo hastened to the city and caused Metellus, and all the
other senators who had joined Sulla, to be decreed public enemies. It was at
this time that the Capitol was burned. Some attributed this deed to Carbo,
others to the consuls, others to somebody sent by Sulla. It was a great
mystery; nor am I able now to conjecture what caused the fire. Sertorius,
who had been some time previously chosen praetor for Spain, after
the taking of Suessa fled to his provincet and as the former
praetors refused to recognize his authority, he stirred up a great
deal of trouble for the Romans there. In the meantime the forces of the
consuls were constantly increasing from the major part of. Italy, which
still adhered to them, and also from the neighboring Gauls on the Po. Nor
was Sulla idle. He sent messengers to all parts of Italy that he could
reach, to collect troops by friendship, by fear, by money, and by promises.
In this way the remainder of the summer was consumed on both sides. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 672</note>
</p>
</div><div n="87" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The consuls for the following year were Papirius Carbo again and Marius, the
nephew of the great Marius, then twenty-seven years of age. At first the
winter and severe frost kept the combatants apart. At the beginning of
spring, on the banks of the river Aesis, there was a severe
engagement lasting from early morning till noon between Metellus and
Carinas, Carbo’s lieutenant. Carinas was put to flight after heavy loss,
whereupon all the country thereabout seceded from the consuls to Metellus.
Carbo came up with Metellus and besieged him until he heard that Marius, the
other consul, had been defeated in a great battle near Praeneste,
when he led his forces back to Ariminum. Pompey hung on his rear doing
damage. The defeat at Praeneste was in this wise. Sulla captured
the town of <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0082">82</date></note> Setia. Marius, who was encamped near
by, drew a little farther away. When he arrived at the so-called sacred lake
(Sacriportus) he gave battle and fought bravely. When his left wing began to
give way five cohorts of foot and two of horse decided not to wait for open
defeat, but lowered their standards together and went over to Sulla. This
was the beginning of a terrible disaster to Marius. His shattered army fled
to Praeneste with Sulla in hot pursuit. The Praeestians
gave shelter to those who arrived first, but when Sulla pressed upon them
the gates were closed, and Marius was hauled up by ropes. There was another
great slaughter around the walls by reason of the closing of the gates.
Sulla captured a large number of prisoners. All the Samnites among them he
killed, because they were always ill-affected toward the Romans. </p>
</div><div n="88" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>About the same time Metellus gained a victory over the other army of Carbo,
and here again five cohorts, for safety’s sake, deserted to Metellus during
the battle. Pompey overcame Marcius near Senae and plundered the
town. Sulla, having shut Marius up in Praeneste, drew a line of
circumvallation around the town a considerable distance from it and left the
work in charge of Lucretius Ofella, as he intended to reduce Marius by
famine, not by fighting. When Marius saw that his condition was hopeless he
hastened to put his private enemies out of the way. He wrote to Brutus, the
city praetor, to call the Senate together on some pretext or other
and to kill Publius Antistius, the other Papirius, Lucius Domitius, and
Mucius Scaevola, the pontifex maximus. Of these the two first were
slain in their seats as Marius had ordered, assassins having been introduced
into the senate-house for this purpose. Domitius ran out, but was killed at
the door, and Scaevola was killed a little farther away. Their
bodies were thrown into the Tiber, for it was now the custom not to bury the
slain. Sulla sent an army to Rome in detachments by different roads with
orders to seize the gates, and if they were repulsed to rendezvous at Ostia.
The towns on the way received them with fear and trembling, and the city
opened its gates to them because the people were oppressed by hunger, and
because, of present evils, they were accustomed to yield to the ones which
were immediately weighing upon them. </p>
</div><div n="89" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Sulla learned this he came on immediately and established his army
before the gates in the Campus Martius. He went inside himself, all of the
opposite faction having fled. Their property was at once confiscated and
exposed to public sale. Sulla summoned the people to an assembly, where he
lamented the necessity of his present doings and told them to cheer up, as
the troubles would soon be over and the government go as it ought. Having
arranged such matters as were pressing and put some of his own men in charge
of the city, he set out for Clusium, where the war was still raging. In the
meantime a body of Celtiberian horse, sent by the praetors in
Spain, had joined the consuls, and there was a cavalry fight on the banks of
the river Glanis. Sulla killed about fifty of the enemy, and then 270 of the
Celtiberian horse deserted to him, and Carbo himself killed the rest of
them, either because he was angry at the desertion of their countrymen or
because he feared similar action on their own part. About the same time
Sulla overcame another detachment of his enemies near Saturnia, and Metellus
sailed around toward Ravenna and took possession of the level, wheat-growing
country of Uritanus. Another Sullan division effected an entrance into
Neapolis by treachery in the night, killed all the inhabitants except a few
who had made their escape, and seized the triremes belonging to the city. A
severe battle was fought near Clusium between Sulla himself and Carbo,
lasting all day. Neither party had the advantage when darkness put an end to
the conflict. </p>
</div><div n="90" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In the plain of Spoletium, Pompey and Crassus, both Sulla’s officers, killed
some 3000 of Carbo’s men and besieged Carinas, the opposing general. Carbo
sent reënforcements to Carinas, but Sulla learned of their
movement, laid an ambush for them, and killed about 2000 of them on the
road. Carinas escaped by night during a heavy rain-storm and thick darkness,
and although the besiegers were aware of some movement, they made no
opposition on account of the storm. Carbo sent Marcius with eight legions to
the relief of his colleague, Marius, at Praeneste, having heard
that he was suffering from hunger. Pompey fell upon them from ambush in a
defile, defeated them, killed a large number, and surrounded the remainder
on a hill. Marcius made his escape, leaving his fires burning. His army
blamed him for being caught in an ambush and stirred up an angry mutiny. One
whole legion marched off under their standards to Ariminum without orders.
The rest separated and went home in squads, so that only seven cohorts
remained with their general. Marcius, having made a mess of it in this way,
returned to Carbo. However, Marcus Lamponius from Lucania, Pontius Telesinus
from Samnium, and Gutta the Capuan, with 70,000 men, hastened to deliver
Marius from the siege, but Sulla occupied a pass which was the only approach
to the place, and blocked the road. Marius now despaired of aid from
without, and built a citadel in the wide space between himself and the
enemy, within which he collected his soldiers and his engines, and from
which he attempted to force his way through the besieging army of Lucretius.
The attempt was renewed several days in different ways, but he accomplished
nothing and was again shut up in Praeneste. </p>
</div><div n="91" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>About the same time Carbo and Norbanus went by a short road to attack the
camp of Metellus in Faventia just before nightfall. There was only one hour
of daylight left, and there were thick vineyards thereabout. They made their
plans for battle in hot temper and not with good judgment, hoping to take
Metellus unawares and to stampede him. But they were beaten, both the place
and the time being unfavorable for them. They became entangled in the vines,
and suffered a heavy slaughter, losing some 10,000 men. About 6000 more
deserted, and the rest were dispersed, only 1000 getting back to Ariminum in
good order. Another legion of Lucanians under Albinovanus, when they heard
of this defeat, went over to Metellus to the great chagrin of their leader.
As the latter was not able to restrain this impulse of his men, he, for the
time, returned to Norbanus. Not many days later he sent secretly to Sulla,
and having obtained a promise of safety from him, if he should accomplish
anything important, he invited Norbanus and his lieutenants, Gaius Antipater
and Flavius Fimbria (brother of the one who committed suicide in Asia),
together with such of Carbo’s lieutenants as were then present, to a feast.
When they had all assembled except Norbanus (he was the only one who did not
come), Albinovanus killed them all at the banquet and then fled to Sulla.
Norbanus having learned that, in consequence of this disaster, Ariminum and
many other camps in the vicinity were going over to Sulla, and being unable
to rely on the good faith and firm support of any of his friends there
present, since he found himself in adversity, took ship as a private
individual and sailed to Rhodes. When, at a later period, Sulla demanded his
surrender, and while the Rhodians were deliberating on it, he killed himself
in the market-place. </p>
</div><div n="92" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Carbo sent Damasippus in haste with two other legions to Praeneste
to relieve Marius, who was still besieged, but not even these could force
their way through the pass that was guarded by Sulla. The Gauls who
inhabited the country lying between Ravenna and the Alps went over to
Metellus <emph>en masse</emph> and Lucullus won a victory over another
body of Carbo’s forces near Placentia. When Carbo learned these facts,
although he still had 30,000 men around Clusium, and the two legions of
Damasippus, and others under Carinas and Marcius, besides a large force of
Samnites, who were courageously enduring hardships at the pass, he fell into
despair and weakly fled to Africa with his friends, although he was still
consul, in order to make a stand there instead of in Italy. Of those whom he
left behind, the army around Clusium had a battle with Pompey in which they
lost 20,000. Naturally, after this greatest disaster of all, the remainder
of the army dissolved in fragments and each man went to his own home.
Carinas, Marcius, and Damasippus went with all the forces they had to the
pass in order to force their way through it in conjunction with the
Samnites. Failing in the attempt, they marched to Rome, thinking that the
city might be easily taken, as it was bereft of men and provisions, and they
encamped in the Alban territory at a distance of 100 stades from it. </p>
</div><div n="93" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Sulla feared for the safety of the city, and sent his cavalry forward with
all speed to hinder their march, and then hastened in person with his whole
army and encamped alongside the Colline gate around the temple of Venus
about noon. The enemy were already encamped around the city. A battle was
fought at once, late in the afternoon. On the right wing Sulla was
victorious. His left wing was vanquished and fled to the gates. The old
soldiers on the walls, when they saw the enemy rushing in with their own
men, dropped the portcullis. It fell upon and killed many soldiers and many
senators. But the majority, impelled by fear and necessity, turned and
fought the enemy. The fighting continued through the night and a great many
were killed. The generals, Telesinus and Albinus, were killed and their camp
was taken. Lamponius the Lucanian, Marcius, and Carinas, and the other
generals of the faction of Carbo, fled. It was estimated that 50,000 men on
both sides lost their lives in this engagement. Prisoners, to the number of
more than 8000, were shot down with darts by Sulla because they were mostly
Samnites. The next day Marcius and Carinas were captured and brought in.
Sulla did not spare them because they were Romans, but killed them both and
sent their heads to Lucretius at Praeneste to be displayed around
the walls. </p>
</div><div n="94" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the Praenestians saw them and knew that Carbo’s army was
completely destroyed, and that Norbanus himself had fled from Italy, and
that Rome and all the rest of Italy were in the power of Sulla, they
surrendered their city to Lucretius. Marius hid himself in an underground
tunnel and shortly afterward committed suicide. Lucretius cut off his head
and sent it to Sulla, who exposed it in the forum in front of the rostra. It
is said that he indulged in a jest at the youth of the consul, saying that
one ought to be a rower before he manages the helm. When Lucretius took
Praeneste he seized the senators who had held commands under
Marius, and put some of them to death and cast the others into prison. The
latter were put to death by Sulla when he came that way. All the others who
were taken in Praeneste he ordered to march out to the plain
without arms, and when they had done so he chose out a very few who had been
in any way serviceable to him. The remainder he ordered to be divided into
three parts, consisting of Romans, Samnites, and Praenestians
respectively. When this had been done he announced to the Romans by herald
that they had merited death, but nevertheless he would pardon them. The
others he massacred to the last man. He allowed their wives and children to
go unharmed. He plundered the town, which was extremely rich at that time.
In this way was Praeneste served. Norba, another town, still
resisted with all its might until Aemilius Lepidus was admitted to
it in the night by treachery. The inhabitants were maddened by this treason.
Some killed themselves, or fell on each other’s swords, others strangled
themselves with ropes. Still others closed the gates and set fire to the
town. A strong wind fanned the flames, which so far consumed the place that
no plunder was left in it. In this way did these stout-hearted men
perish.</p>
</div></div>
  <div n="11" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XI</head>
<head>Proscription and Massacre by Sulla—Confiscation and Murder in the
Provinces—Sulla Triumphant—Is made Dictator for Life—The Sullan
Constitution—Lucretius Ofella slain by Sulla’s Order—Distress and
Exhaustion of Italy</head>
<div n="95" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After accomplishing these deeds throughout Italy by war, fire, and murder,
Sulla’s generals visited the several cities and established garrisons at the
suspected places. Pompey was despatched to Africa against Carbo and to
Sicily against Carbo’s friends who had taken refuge there. Sulla himself
called the Roman people together in an assembly and made them a speech
vaunting his own exploits and making other menacing statements in order to
inspire terror. He finished by saying that he would bring about a change
which would be beneficial to the public if they would obey him. He would not
spare one of his enemies, but would visit them with the utmost severity. He
would take vengeance by every means in his power on all praetors,
quaestors, military tribunes, and everybody else who had committed
any hostile act after the day when the consul Scipio violated the agreement
made with him. After saying this he forthwith proscribed about forty
senators and 1600 knights. <note resp="translator">Mommsen says that the list of the proscribed
reached 4700 names. <q rend="double">This total,</q> he adds, <q rend="double">is given by Valerius
Maximus, ix. 2, i. According to Appian (<title>B.C.</title> i. 95) there
were proscribed by Sulla nearly 40 senators and 1600 knights; according to Florus (ii. 9, whence Augustine,
<title>de Civ. Dei,</title> iii. 28) 2000 senators and knights.
According to Plutarch (<title>Sull.</title> 31) 520 names were placed on
the list in the first three days; according to Orosius (v. 21) 580 names
during the first days. There is no material contradiction between these
various reports, for it was not senators and knights alone that were put
to death, and the list remained open for months. When Appian, at another
passage (i. 103), mentions as put to death or banished by Sulla, 15
consulars, go senators, 2600 knights, he there confounds, as the context
shows, the victims of the civil war throughout, with the victims of
Sulla. . . . On a comparison of the figures 50 senators and 1000 knights
were regarded as victims of Marius, 40 senators 1600 knights as victims of Sulla; this furnishes a
standard—at least not altogether arbitrary—for estimating the extent
of the mischief on both sides.</q> (<title>Hist. of Rome,</title> iii.
423.)</note> He seems to have been the first one to punish by
proscription, to offer prizes to assassins and rewards wards to informers,
and to threaten with punishment those who should conceal the proscribed.
Shortly afterward he added the names of other senators to the proscription.
Some of these, taken unawares, were killed where they were caught, in their
houses, in the streets, or in the temples. Others were picked up, carried to
Sulla, and thrown down at his feet. Others were dragged through the city and
trampled on, none of the spectators daring to utter a word of remonstrance
against these horrors. Banishment was inflicted upon some and confiscation
upon others. Spies were searching everywhere for those who had fled from the
city, and those whom they caught they killed. </p>
</div><div n="96" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>There was much killing, banishment, and confiscation also among those
Italians who had obeyed Carbo, or Marius, or Norbanus, or their lieutenants.
Severe judgments of the courts were rendered against them throughout all
Italy on various charges—for exercising military command, for serving in
the army, for contributing money, for rendering other service, or even
giving counsel against Sulla. Hospitality, private friendship, the borrowing
or lending of money, were alike accounted crimes. Now and then one would be
arrested for doing a kindness to a suspect, or merely for being his
companion on a journey. These accusations abounded mostly against the rich.
When charges against individuals failed Sulla took vengeance on whole
communities. He punished some of them by demolishing their citadels, or
destroying their walls, or by imposing heavy fines and contributions on
them. Among most of them he placed colonies of his troops in order to hold
Italy under garrisons, sequestrating their lands and houses and dividing
them among his soldiers, whom he thus made true to him during his life and
even after his death. As they could not be secure in their own holdings
unless all of Sulla’s affairs were on a firm foundation, they were his
stoutest champions even after he was deceased. While the affairs of Italy
were in this state, Pompey sent a force and captured Carbo, who had fled
with many persons of distinction from Africa to Sicily and thence to the
island of Cossyra. He ordered his officers to kill all of the others without
bringing them into his presence; but Carbo, who had been thrice consul, he
caused to be brought before his feet in chains, and after making a public
harangue at him, killed him and sent his head to Sulla. </p>
</div><div n="97" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When everything had been accomplished against his enemies as he desired, and
there was no longer any hostile force except that of Sertorius, who was far
distant, Sulla sent Metellus into Spain against him and managed everything
in the city to suit himself. There was no longer any occasion for laws, or
elections, or for casting lots, because everybody was shivering with fear
and in hiding, or dumb. Everything that Sulla had done as consul, or as
proconsul, was confirmed and ratified, and his gilded equestrian statue was
erected in front of the rostra with the inscription, <q rend="double">Cornelius Sulla, a
fortunate commander,</q> for so his flatterers called him on account of his
unbroken success against his enemies. And this flattering title still
attaches to him. I have come across a history which relates that Sulla was
styled Epaphroditus<note resp="translator">The favorite
of Venus.</note> by a decree of the Senate itself. This does not seem to
me to be inappropriate for he was also called Faustus (lucky), which name
seems to have very nearly the same signification as Epaphroditus. There was
also an oracle given to him somewhere which, in response to his question
concerning the future, assured his prosperous career as follows:—</p>
<p><q rend="double">Believe me, Roman, the Cyprian goddess cares for the race of Aeneas
and has given it great power. Render yearly gifts to all the immortals, and
do not forget them. Convey gifts to Delphi. There is also a place where men
go up under snowy Taurus, a wide-reaching city of the Carians,<note resp="translator">The town of Aphrodisias in Caria,
dedicated to Venus. It is mentioned in the <title>Annals</title> of
Tacitus (iii. 62) as one of those whose title to be considered a lawful
sanctuary and refuge for criminals was investigated during the reign of
Tiberius.</note> whose inhabitants have named it for Aphrodite. Give the
goddess an axe and you shall gain sovereign power.</q><note resp="translator">
<foreign xml:lang="grc">Πείθεό μοι Πωμαῖε, κράτος μέγα Κύπρις
 ἔδωκεν Αἰνείου γενεῇ μεμελημένη. Ἀλλὰ σὺ πᾶσιν
ἀθανάτοις ἐπέτεια τίθει· μὴ λήθεο τῶνδε. Δελφοῖς δῶρα
κόμιζε. Καὶ ἔστι τις ἀμβαίνουσι Ταύρου ὑπὸ νιφόεντος,
ὅπου περιμήκετον ἄσγυ Καρῶν, οἱ ναίουσιν ἐπώνυμον ἐξ
Ἀφροδίγης· καὶ πέλεκυν θέμενος, λήψῃ κράτος ἀμιφλαφες
σοι.</foreign>
</note></p>
<p>Whichever decree the Romans voted when they erected the statue, they seem to
me to have made the inscription by way of jest or cajolery. However, Sulla
sent a golden crown and an axe to Venus with this inscription:—</p>
 <p><q rend="double">The dictator Sulla dedicates this to thee, Venus, because in a dream he saw
thee in panoply setting the army in order of battle and fighting with the
weapons of Mars.</q> <note resp="translator">
 <foreign xml:lang="grc">Τόνδε σοι αὐτοκράτωρ Σύλλας ἀνέθηκ’, Ἀφροδίτη, ὡς εἶδον κατ’ ὄνειρον ἀνὰ στρατιὴν διέπουσαν τεύχεσι τοῖς Ἄρεος μαρναμενην ἔνοπλον.</foreign>
</note>
</p>
</div><div n="98" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus Sulla became king, or tyrant, <emph>de facto,</emph> not elected,
but holding power by force and violence. As, however, he needed some
pretence of being elected it was managed in this way. The kings of the
Romans in the olden time were chosen for their bravery, and when one of them
died the senators held the royal power in succession for five days each,
until the people could decide who should be the new king. This five-day
ruler was called the Interrex, which means king for the time being. The
retiring consuls always presided over the election of their successors in
office, and if there chanced to be no consul at such a time an Interrex was
appointed for the purpose of holding the consular comitia. Sulla took
advantage of this custom. There were no consuls at this time, Carbo having
lost his life in Sicily and Marius in Praeneste. So Sulla went out
of the city for a time and ordered the Senate to choose an Interrex. They
chose Valerius Flaccus, expecting that he would soon hold the consular
comitia. But Sulla wrote to Flaccus to bring before the people the
proposition that he (Sulla) considered it advisable, under present
circumstances, that the city should be governed by a dictator according to a
custom that had been abandoned 400 years. <note resp="translator">This is probably a corruption of the text. The last
dictator was appointed in the year <date when="-0202">202</date> B.C.,
or 120 years before Sulla assumed that office.</note> He told them not
to appoint the dictator for any definite time, but until the city and Italy
and the whole government, so shaken by factions and wars, should be put upon
a firm foundation. That this proposal referred to Sulla himself was not at
all doubtful. Sulla made no concealment of it. At the conclusion of the
letter he declared openly that, in his judgment, he could be serviceable to
the city in that capacity. </p>
</div><div n="99" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Such was Sulla’s letter. The Romans were unwilling, but they had no more
opportunities for elections according to law, and they considered that this
matter was not altogether in their own power. So, in the absence of
everything else, they welcomed this pretence of an election as an image and
semblance of freedom and chose Sulla their absolute master for as long a
time as he pleased. There had been autocratic rule of the dictators before,
but it was limited to short periods. But in Sulla’s time it first became
unlimited and so an absolute tyranny; yet they added, for propriety’s sake,
that they chose him dictator for the enactment of such laws as he might deem
best and for the regulation of the commonwealth. Thus the Romans, after
having government by kings for sixty Olympiads, and a democracy, under
consuls chosen yearly, for 100 Olympiads, resorted to kingly government
again. This was in the 175th Olympiad according to the Greek calendar, but
there were no Olympic games then except races in the stadium, since Sulla
had carried away the athletes and all the sights and shows to Rome to
celebrate his victories in the Mithridatic and Italian wars, under the
pretext that the masses needed a breathing-spell and recreation after their
toils. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 673</note>
</p>
</div><div n="100" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Nevertheless, as the form of the republic remained <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0081">81</date></note> he
allowed them to appoint consuls. Marcus Tullius and Cornelius Dolabella were
chosen. But Sulla, like a reigning sovereign, was dictator over the consuls.
Twenty-four axes were borne in front of him, as was customary with
dictators, the same number that were borne before the ancient kings, and he
had a large body-guard also. He repealed laws and he enacted others. He
forbade anybody to hold the office of praetor until after he had
held that of quaestor, or to be consul before he had been
praetor, and he prohibited any man from holding the same office a
second time till after the lapse of ten years. He reduced the tribunician
power to such an extent that it seemed to be destroyed. He curtailed it by a
law which provided that one holding the office of tribune should never
afterward hold any other office; for which reason all men of reputation or
family, who formerly contended for this office, shunned it thereafter. I am
not able to say positively whether Sulla transferred this office from the
people to the Senate, where it is now lodged, or not. To the Senate itself,
which had been much thinned by the seditions and wars, he added about 300
members from the best of the knights, taking the vote of the tribes for each
one. To the plebeians he added more than 10,000 slaves of proscribed
persons, choosing the youngest and strongest, to whom he gave freedom and
Roman citizenship, and he called them Cornelii after himself. In this way he
made sure of having 10,000 men among the plebeians always ready to obey his
commands. In order to provide the same kind of safeguard throughout Italy he
distributed to the twenty-three legions that had served under him a great
deal of land among the communities, as I have already related, some of which
was public property and some taken from the communities by way of fine. </p>
</div><div n="101" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>So terrible was he and so uncontrollable in anger that he slew in the middle
of the forum Q. Lucretius Ofella, the one who had besieged and captured
Praeneste and the consul Marius, and had won the final victory for
him. He did this because, in spite of the new law, Lucretius persisted,
though Sulla opposed and forbade, in being a candidate for the consulship
while he was still in the equestrian order and before he had been
quaestor and praetor, presuming on the greatness of his
services, according to the former custom, and captivating the populace. Then
Sulla assembled the people and said to them, <q rend="double">Know, citizens, and learn from
me, that I caused the death of Lucretius because he disobeyed me.</q> And then
he told the following story: <q rend="double">A husbandman was bitten by fleas while
ploughing. He stopped his ploughing twice in order to clear them out of his
shirt. When they bit him. again he burned his shirt, so that he might not be
so often interrupted in his work. And I tell you, who have felt my hand
twice, to take warning lest the third time fire be brought in requisition.</q>
 With these words he terrified them and thereafter ruled as he pleased. He
had a triumph on account of the Mithridatic war, during which some of the
scoffers called his government <q rend="double">the royalty disavowed</q> because only the
name of king was concealed. Others took the contrary view, judging from his
acts, and called it <q rend="double">the tyranny confessed.</q> </p>
</div><div n="102" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Into such evils were the Romans and all the Italians plunged by this war; and
so likewise were all the countries beyond Italy by the recent piracies, or
by the Mithridatic war, or by the many exhausting taxes levied to meet the
deficit in the public treasury due to the seditions. All the allied nations
and kings, and not only the tributary cities, but those which had delivered
themselves to the Romans voluntarily under sworn agreements, and those which
by virtue of their furnishing aid in war or for some other merit were
autonomous and not subject to tribute, all were now required to pay and to
obey. Some that had surrendered themselves under treaty arrangements were
deprived of their territory and their harbors. Sulla decreed that Alexander
(the son of Alexander the former sovereign of Egypt), who had been reared in
Cos and given to Mithridates by the inhabitants of that island, and had fled
to Sulla and become intimate with him, should be king of Alexandria. He did
this because the government of Alexandria was destitute of a sovereign in
the male line, and the women of the royal house wanted a man of the same
lineage, and because he (Sulla) expected to reap a large reward from the
rich kingdom. As Alexander behaved himself in a very offensive manner toward
them, relying upon Sulla, the Alexandrians, on the nineteenth day of his
reign, dragged him from the palace to the gymnasium and put him to death; so
little fear had they of foreigners, either by reason of the magnitude of
their own government or their inexperience as yet of external dangers.</p>
</div></div>
  <div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XII</head>
<head>Sulla’s Abdication—Character of Sulla—His Death, and Funeral</head>
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 674</note>
<div n="103" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The following year Sulla, although he was dictator, <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0080">80</date></note> undertook
the consulship a second time, with Metellus Pius for his colleague, in order
to preserve the pretence and form of democratic government. It is perhaps
from this example that the Roman emperors now make a showing of consuls to
the country and even exhibit themselves in that capacity, considering it not
unbecoming to hold the office of consul in connection with the supreme
power. The next year the people, in order to pay court to Sulla, chose him
consul again, but he refused the office and nominated Servilius Isauricus
and Claudius Pulcher for their suffrages, and voluntarily laid down the
supreme power, although nobody was troubling him. This act seems wonderful
to me—that Sulla should have been the first, and till then the only one, to
abdicate such vast power without compulsion, not to sons (like Ptolemy in
Egypt, or Ariobarzanes in Cappadocia, or Seleucus in Syria), but to the very
people over whom he had tyrannized. Almost incredible is it that after
incurring so many dangers in forcing his way to this power he should have
laid it down of his own free will after he had acquired it. Paradoxical
beyond anything is the fact that he was afraid of nothing, although more
than 100,000 young men had perished in this war, and he had destroyed of his
enemies ninety senators, fifteen consulars, and 2600 of the so-called
knights, including the banished. The property of these men had been
confiscated and many of their bodies cast out unburied. Undaunted by the
relatives of these persons at home, or by the banished abroad, or by the
cities whose <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 675</note>
towers and walls he had thrown down and whose lands, <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0079">79</date></note> money,
and privileges he had swept away, Sulla now returned to private life. </p>
</div><div n="104" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>So great was this man’s boldness and good fortune. It is said that he made a
speech in the forum when he laid down his power in which he offered to give
the reasons for what he had done to anybody who should ask them. He
dismissed the lictors with their axes and discontinued his body-guard, and
for a long time walked to the forum with only a few friends, the multitude
looking upon him with awe even then. Once only when he was going home he was
reproached by a boy. As nobody restrained this boy he made bold to follow
Sulla to his house, railing at him, and Sulla, who had opposed the greatest
men and states with towering rage, endured his reproaches with calmness and
as he went into the house said, divining the future either by his
intelligence or by chance, <q rend="double">This young man will prevent any other holder of
such power from laying it down.</q> This saying was shortly confirmed to the
Romans, for Gaius Caesar never laid down his power. Sulla seems to
me to have been the same masterful and able man in all respects, whether
striving to reach supreme power from private life, or changing back to
private life from supreme power, or later when passing his time in rural
solitude; for he retired to his own estate at Cumae in Italy and
there occupied his leisure in hunting and fishing. He did this not because
he was afraid to live a private life in the city, nor because he had not
sufficient bodily strength for whatever he might try to do. He was still of
virile age and sound constitution, and there were 120,000 men throughout
Italy who had recently served under him in war and had received large gifts
of money and land from him, and there were the 10,000 Cornelii ready in the
city, besides other people of his party devoted to him and still formidable
to his opponents, all of whom rested upon Sulla’s safety their hopes of
impunity for what they had done in coöperation with him. But I
think that he was satiated with war, with power, with city affairs, and that
he took to rural life finally because he loved it. <note resp="translator">Sulla was fifty-nine years of age when he retired
and he died in the following year.</note>
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 676</note>
</p>
</div><div n="105" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Directly after his retirement the Romans, although <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0078">78</date></note> delivered
from slaughter and tyranny, began gradually to fan the flames of new
seditions. Quintus Catulus and Aemilius Lepidus were chosen
consuls, the former of the Sullan faction and the latter of the opposite
party. They hated each other bitterly and began to quarrel immediately, from
which it was plain that fresh troubles were brewing. While he was living in
the country Sulla had a dream in which he thought he saw his Genius already
calling him. <note resp="translator">So in Shakespeare’s
 <title>Troilus and Cressida,</title> iv. 4:— <quote><q rend="double">Some say the
Genius so cries <q rend="single">Come</q> to him that instantly must
die.</q></quote></note> Early in the morning he told the dream to his
friends and in haste began writing his will, which he finished that day.
After sealing it he was taken with a fever towards evening and died the same
night. He was sixty years of age and had been the most fortunate of men even
to the very last, and realized in all respects the title he bore; that is,
if one can be considered fortunate who obtains all that he desires.
Immediately a dissension sprang up in the city over his remains, some
proposing to bring them in a procession through Italy and exhibit them in
the forum and give him a public funeral. Lepidus and his faction opposed
this, but Catulus and the Sullan party prevailed. Sulla’s corpse was borne
through Italy on a golden litter with royal splendor. Musicians and horsemen
in great numbers went in advance and a great multitude of armed men followed
on foot. His fellow-soldiers flocked from all directions under arms to join
the procession, and each one was assigned his place in due order as he came.
The crowd of other people that came together was unprecedented. The
standards and the fasces that he had used while living and ruling were borne
in the procession. </p>
</div><div n="106" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the remains reached the city they were borne through the streets with an
enormous procession. More than 2000 golden crowns which had been made in
haste were carried in it, the gifts of cities and of the legions that he had
commanded and of individual friends. It would be impossible to describe all
the splendid things contributed to this funeral. From fear of the assembled
soldiery all the priests and priestesses escorted the remains, each in
proper costume. The entire Senate and the whole body of magistrates attended
with their insignia of office. A multitude of the Roman knights followed
with their peculiar decorations, and, in their turn, all the legions that
had fought under him. They came together with eagerness, all hastening to
join in the task, carrying gilded standards and silver-plated shields, such
as are still used on such occasions. There was a countless number of
trumpeters who by turns played the most mournful dirges. Loud cries were
raised, first by the Senate, then by the knights, then by the soldiers, and
finally by the plebeians. For some really longed for Sulla, but others were
afraid of his army and his dead body, as they had been of himself when
living. As they looked at the present spectacle and remembered what this man
had accomplished they were amazed, and agreed with their opponents that he
had been most beneficial to his own party and most formidable to themselves
even in death. The corpse was shown in the forum on the rostra, where public
speeches were usually made, and the most eloquent of the Romans then living
delivered the funeral oration, as Sulla’s son, Faustus, was still very
young. Then strong men of the senators took up the litter and carried it to
the Campus Martius, where only kings were buried, and the knights and the
army coursed around the funeral pile. And this was the last of Sulla.</p>
</div></div>
  <div n="13" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XIII</head>
<head>New Dissensions in Rome—The War with Sertorius—Pompey sent against
him—Sertorius defeats Pompey—Wars Elsewhere—Sertorius puts Pompey to
flight at Pallantia—Sertorius assassinated by Perpenna—Perpenna takes
the Command—Is defeated and slain by Pompey</head>
<div n="107" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Directly after their return from the funeral the consuls fell into a wordy
quarrel and the citizens began to take sides with them. Lepidus, in order to
curry favor with the Italians, said that he would restore the land which
Sulla had taken from them. The Senate was afraid of both factions and made
them take an oath that they would not carry their differences to the point
of war. To Lepidus the province of transalpine Gaul was assigned by lot and
he did not come back to the comitia because he would be released in the
following year from his oath about making war on the Sullans; for it was
considered that the oath was binding only during the term of office. As his
designs did not escape observation he was recalled by the Senate, and as he
knew why he was recalled he came with his whole army, intending to bring
them into the city with him. As he was prevented from doing this, he ordered
his men under arms and Catulus did the same on the other side. A battle was
fought not far from the Campus Martius. Lepidus was defeated and, soon
giving up the struggle, sailed shortly afterward to Sardinia, where he died
of a wasting disease. His army was frittered away little by little and
dissolved, the greater part of it was conducted by Perpenna to Sertorius in
Spain. </p>
</div><div n="108" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>There remained of the Sullan troubles the war with Sertorius, which had been
going on for eight years, <note resp="translator">More
probably ten years, Mendelssohn thinks.</note> and was not an easy war
to the Romans since it was waged not merely against Spaniards, but against
other Romans and Sertorius. He had been chosen governor of Spain while he
was coöperating with Carbo against Sulla; and after taking the city
of Suessa during the armistice he fled and assumed his praetorship.
He had an army from Italy itself and he raised another from the
Celtiberians, and drove out of Spain the former praetors, who, in
order to favor Sulla, refused to surrender the government to him. He had
also fought nobly against Metellus, who had been sent against him by Sulla.
Having acquired a reputation for bravery he enrolled a council of 300
members from the friends who were with him, and called it the Roman Senate
in derision <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 677</note> of
the real one. After Sulla died, and Lepidus later, he <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0077">77</date></note> obtained
another army of Italians which Perpenna, the lieutenant of Lepidus, brought
to him and it was supposed that he intended to march against Italy itself,
and would have done so had not the Senate become alarmed and sent another
army and general into Spain in addition to the former ones. This general was
Pompey, who was still a young man, but renowned for his exploits in the time
of Sulla, in Africa and in Italy itself. </p>
</div><div n="109" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompey courageously crossed the Alps, not in the face of such difficulties as
Hannibal experienced, but he opened another passage around the sources of
the Rhone and the Eridanus. These issue from the Alpine mountains not far
from each other. One of them runs through transalpine Gaul and empties into
the Tyrrhenian sea; the other from the interior of the Alps to the Adriatic.
The name of the latter has been changed from the Eridanus to the Po. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 678</note> Directly Pompey
arrived in Spain Sertorius cut in pieces <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0076">76</date></note> a whole legion of
his army, that had been sent out foraging, with its animals and servants. He
also plundered and destroyed the Roman town of Lauro before the very eyes of
Pompey. In this siege a woman tore out with her fingers the eyes of a
soldier who had insulted her and was trying to commit an outrage upon her.
When Sertorius heard of this he put to death the whole cohort that was
supposed to be addicted to such brutality, although it was composed of
Romans. Then the armies were separated by the advent of winter. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 679</note>
</p>
</div><div n="110" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When spring came they resumed hostilities, Metellus and Pompey coming from
the Pyrenees mountains, where they had wintered, and Sertorius and Perpenna
from Lusitania. They met near the town of Sucro. While the fight was going
on flashes of lightning came unexpectedly from a clear sky, but these
trained soldiers were not in the least dismayed. They continued the fight,
with heavy slaughter on both sides, until Metellus defeated Perpenna and
plundered his camp. On the other hand, Sertorius defeated Pompey, who
received a dangerous wound from a spear in the thigh, and this put an end to
that battle. Sertorius had a white fawn that was tame and allowed to move
about freely. When this fawn was not visible Sertorius considered it a bad
omen. He became low-spirited and abstained from fighting; nor did he mind
the enemy’s scoffing at the fawn. When she made her appearance running
through the woods Sertorius would run to meet her and, as though he were
inspired by her, he would begin to harass the enemy. Not long afterward
Sertorius fought a great battle near Seguntia, lasting from noon till night.
Sertorius fought on horseback and vanquished Pompey, killing nearly 6000 of
his men and losing about half that number himself. Metellus at the same time
destroyed <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0075">75</date></note> about 5000 of Perpenna’s army. The day after this
battle Sertorius, with a large reënforcement of barbarians,
attacked the camp of Metellus unexpectedly towards evening with the
intention of besieging it with a trench, but Pompey hastened up and caused
Sertorius to desist from his bold enterprise. In this way they passed the
summer, and again they separated to winter quarters. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 680</note>
</p>
</div><div n="111" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The following year, which was in the 176th Olympiad, <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0074">74</date></note> two
countries were acquired by the Romans by bequest. Bithynia was left to them
by Nicomedes, and Cyrene by Ptolemy Apion, of the house of the
Lagidae. There were wars and wars; the Sertorian was raging in
Spain, the Mithridatic in the East, that of the pirates on the entire sea,
and another one around Crete against the Cretans themselves, besides the
gladiatorial war in Italy, which started suddenly and became very serious.
Although distracted by so many conflicts the Romans sent another army of two
legions into Spain. With these and the other forces in their hands Metellus
and Pompey again descended from the Pyrenees mountains to the Ebro and
Sertorius and Perpenna advanced from Lusitania to meet them. At this
juncture many of the soldiers of Sertorius deserted to Metellus. </p>
</div><div n="112" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Sertorius was so exasperated by this that he visited savage and barbarous
punishment upon many of his men and fell into disrepute in consequence. The
soldiers blamed him particularly because wherever he went he surrounded
himself with a body-guard of Celtiberian spearmen instead of Romans,
removing the latter in favor of the former. Nor could they bear to be
reproached with treachery by him while they were serving under an enemy of
the Roman people. That they should be charged with bad faith by Sertorius
while they were acting in bad faith to their country on his account, was the
very thing that vexed them most. Nor did they consider it just that those
who remained with the standards should be condemned because others deserted.
Moreover, the Celtiberians took this occasion to insult them as men under
suspicion. Still they were not altogether alienated from Sertorius since
they derived advantages from his service, for there was no other man of that
period more skilled in the art of war or more successful in it. For this
reason, and on account of the rapidity of his movements, the Celtiberians
gave him the name of Hannibal, whom they considered the boldest and most
crafty general ever known in their country. In this way the army stood
affected toward Sertorius. The forces of Metellus overran many of his towns
and brought the men belonging to them under subjection. While Pompey was
laying siege to Pallantia and underrunning the walls with wooden supports,
Sertorius suddenly appeared on the scene and raised the siege. Pompey
hastily set fire to the timbers and retreated to Metellus. Sertorius rebuilt
the part of the wall which had fallen and then attacked his enemies who were
encamped around the castle of Calagurris and killed 3000 of them. And so
this year went by in Spain. <note resp="translator">A
letter from Pompey to the Senate describing his desperate condition and
threatening, unless supplied with money, to return to Italy, with
Sertorius probably in close pursuit, is preserved in the writings of
Sallust.</note>
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 681</note>
</p>
</div><div n="113" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In the following year the Roman generals plucked <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0073">73</date></note> up rather
more courage and advanced in an audacious manner against the towns that
adhered to Sertorius, drew many away from him, assaulted others, and were
much elated by their success. No great battle was fought, but again <note resp="translator">Schweighäuser detects a
lacuna here which he fills with the words <q rend="double">there were skirmishes here
and there.</q></note> . . . until the following year, when they advanced
again even more audaciously. Sertorius was now <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 682</note> evidently misled by a god, for he
relaxed his labors, fell <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C.
<date when="-0072">72</date></note> into habits of luxury, and gave
himself up to women, and to carousing and drinking, for which reason he was
defeated continually. He became hot-tempered, from various suspicions, and
extremely cruel in punishment, and distrustful of everybody, <note resp="translator">Plutarch represents Sertorius as
temperate, unassailable by either pleasure or fear, and <q rend="double">very sparing
and backward in punishing offenders.</q> (<title>Life of Sertorius,</title>
10.)</note> so much so that Perpenna, who had belonged to the faction of
Lepidus and had come hither as a volunteer with a considerable army, began
to fear for his own safety and formed a conspiracy with ten other men
against him. The conspiracy was betrayed, some of the guilty ones were
punished and others fled, but Perpenna escaped detection in some
unaccountable manner and applied himself all the more to carry out the
design. As Sertorius was never without his guard of spearmen, Perpenna
invited him to a banquet, plied him and his guards with wine, and
assassinated him after the feast. </p>
</div><div n="114" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The soldiers straightway rose in tumult and anger against Perpenna, their
hatred of Sertorius being suddenly turned to affection for him, as people
generally mollify their anger toward the dead, and when the one who has
injured them is no longer before their eyes recall his virtues with tender
memory. Reflecting on their present situation they despised Perpenna as
though he had been a private individual, for they considered that the
bravery of Sertorius had been their only salvation. They were angry with
Perpenna, and the barbarians were no less so; most of all were the
Lusitanians, of whose services Sertorius had especially availed himself.
When the will of Sertorius was opened a bequest to Perpenna was found in it,
and thereupon still greater anger and hatred of him entered into the minds
of all, since he had committed such an abominable crime, not merely against
his ruler and commanding general, but against his friend and benefactor. And
they would not have abstained from violence had not Perpenna bestirred
himself, making gifts to some and promises to others. Some he terrified with
threats and some he killed in order to strike terror into the rest. He came
forward and made a speech to the multitude, and released from confinement
some whom Sertorius had imprisoned, and dismissed some of the Spanish
hostages. Reduced to submission in this way they obeyed him as
praetor (for he held the next rank to Sertorius) yet they were not
without bitterness toward him even then. As he grew bolder he became very
cruel in punishments, and put to death three of the nobility who had fled
together from Rome to him, and also his own nephew. </p>
</div><div n="115" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As Metellus had gone to other parts of Spain,— for he considered it no
longer a difficult task for Pompey alone to vanquish Perpenna, — these two
skirmished and made tests of each other for several days, but did not bring
their whole strength into the field. On the tenth day, however, a great
battle was fought between them. They resolved to decide the contest by one
engagement—Pompey because he despised the generalship of Perpenna; Perpenna
because he did not believe that his army would long remain faithful to him,
and he could now engage with nearly his whole strength. Pompey, as might
have been expected, soon got the better of this inferior general and
disaffected army. Perpenna was defeated all along the line and concealed
himself in a thicket, more fearful of his own troops than of the enemy’s. He
was seized by some horsemen and dragged toward Pompey’s headquarters, loaded
with the execrations of his own men, as the murderer of Sertorius, and
crying out that he could give Pompey a great deal of information about the
factions in Rome. This he said either because it was true, or in order to be
brought safe to Pompey’s presence, but the latter sent orders to kill him
before bringing him into his presence, fearing lest the news that Perpenna
wanted to communicate should be the source of new troubles at Rome. Pompey
seems to have behaved very prudently in this matter, and his action added to
his high reputation. So ended the war in Spain with the life of Sertorius. I
think that if he had lived longer the war would not have ended so soon or so
successfully.<note resp="translator">Plutarch says
that Perpenna, having the papers of Sertorius in his hands, offered to
show Pompey letters from persons of the highest quality in Rome inviting
Sertorius to march to Italy in order to bring about a change in the
government, but that Pompey took the papers and burned them without
reading them, or allowing anybody else to do so. He says also that all
of the conspirators against Sertorius who fell into Pompey’s hands were
put to death by his orders. (<title>Life of Sertorius,</title>
27.)</note></p>
</div></div>
  <div n="14" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XIV</head>
<head>The War with Spartacus—He defeats the Romans in Several
Engagements—Crassus appointed to the Command—He defeats and kills
Spartacus—End of the War—Rivalry of Pompey and Crassus—Their
Reconciliation</head>
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 681</note>
<div n="116" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>At the same time Spartacus, a Thracian by birth, who had once served as a
soldier with the Romans, but had since been a prisoner and sold for a
gladiator, and was in the gladiatorial training-school at Capua, persuaded
about <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0073">73</date></note> seventy of his comrades to strike for their own
freedom rather than for the amusement of spectators. They overcame the
guards and ran away. They armed themselves with clubs and daggers that they
took from people on the roads and took refuge on Mount Vesuvius. There many
fugitive slaves and even some freemen from the fields joined Spartacus, and
he plundered the neighboring country, having for subordinate officers two
gladiators named Œnomaus and Crixus. As he divided the plunder
impartially he soon had plenty of men. Varinius Glaber was first sent
against him and afterward Publius Valerius, not with regular armies, but
with forces picked up in haste and at random, for the Romans did not
consider this a war as yet, but a raid, something like an outbreak of
robbery. When they attacked Spartacus they were beaten. Spartacus even
captured the horse of Varinius; so narrowly did a Roman praetor
escape being captured by a gladiator. After this still greater numbers
flocked to Spartacus till his army numbered 70,000 men. For these he
manufactured weapons and collected apparatus. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 682</note>
</p>
</div><div n="117" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Rome now sent out the consuls with two legions. One of them overcame Crixus
with 30,000 men near Mount Garganus, two-thirds of whom perished together
with himself. Spartacus endeavored to make his way through the Apennines to
the Alps and the Gallic country, but one of the consuls anticipated him and
hindered his march while the other hung upon his rear. He turned upon them
one after the other and beat them in detail. They retreated in confusion in
different directions. Spartacus sacrificed 300 Roman prisoners to the manes
of Crixus, and marched on Rome with 120,000 foot, having burned all his
useless material, killed all his prisoners, and butchered his pack-animals
in order to expedite his movement. Many deserters offered themselves to him,
but he would not accept them. The consuls again met him in the country of
Picenum. Here was another great battle and then, too, a great defeat for the
Romans. Spartacus changed his intention of marching on Rome. He did not
consider himself ready as yet for that kind of a fight, as his whole force
was not suitably armed, for no city had joined him, but only slaves,
deserters, and riff-raff. However, he occupied the <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0072">72</date></note> mountains
around Thurii and took the city itself. He prohibited the bringing in of
gold or silver by merchants, and would not allow his own men to acquire any,
but he bought largely of iron and brass and did not interfere with those who
dealt in these articles. Supplied with abundant material from this source
his men provided themselves with plenty of arms and continued in robbery for
the time being. When they next came to an engagement with the Romans they
were again victorious, and returned laden with spoils. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 683</note>
</p>
</div><div n="118" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>This war, so formidable to the Romans (although <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0071">71</date></note>
ridiculous and contemptible in the beginning, considered as the work of
gladiators), had now lasted three years. When the election of new
praetors came on, fear fell upon all, and nobody offered himself as
a candidate until Licinius Crassus, a man distinguished among the Romans for
birth and wealth, assumed the praetorship and marched against
Spartacus with six new legions. When he arrived at his destination he
received also the two legions of the consuls, whom he decimated by lot for
their bad conduct in several battles. Some say that Crassus, too, having
engaged in battle with his whole army, and having been defeated, decimated
the whole army and was not deterred by their numbers, but destroyed about
4000 of them. Whichever way it was, he demonstrated to them that he was more
dangerous to them than the enemy. Presently he overcame 10,000 of the
Spartacans, who were encamped somewhere in a detached position, and killed
two-thirds of them. He then marched boldly against Spartacus himself,
vanquished him in a brilliant engagement, and pursued his fleeing forces to
the sea, where they tried to pass over to Sicily. He overtook them and
enclosed them with a line of circumvallation consisting of ditch, wall, and
paling. </p>
</div><div n="119" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Spartacus tried to break through and make an incursion into the Samnite
country, but Crassus slew about 6000 of his men in the morning and as many
more towards evening. Only three of the Roman army were killed and seven
wounded, so great was the improvement in their <emph>morale</emph>
inspired by the recent punishment. Spartacus, who was expecting from
somewhere a reënforcement of horse, no longer went into battle with
his whole army, but harassed the besiegers by frequent sallies here and
there. He fell upon them unexpectedly and continually, threw bundles of
fagots into the ditch and set them on fire and made their labor difficult.
He crucified a Roman prisoner in the space between the two armies to show
his own men what fate awaited them if they did not conquer. When the Romans
in the city heard of the siege they thought it would be disgraceful if this
war against gladiators should be prolonged. Believing also that the work
still to be done against Spartacus was great and severe they ordered up the
army of Pompey, which had just arrived from Spain, as a
reënforcement. </p>
</div><div n="120" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>On account of this vote Crassus tried in every way to come to an engagement
with Spartacus so that Pompey might not reap the glory of the war. Spartacus
himself, thinking to anticipate Pompey, invited Crassus to come to terms
with him. When his proposals were rejected with scorn he resolved to risk a
battle, and as his cavalry had arrived he made a dash with his whole army
through the lines of the besieging force and pushed on to Brundusium with
Crassus in pursuit. When Spartacus learned that Lucullus had just arrived in
Brundusium from his victory over Mithridates he despaired of everything and
brought his forces, which were even then very numerous, to close quarters
with Crassus. The battle was long and bloody, as might have been expected
with so many thousands of desperate men. Spartacus was wounded in the thigh
with a spear and sank upon his knee, holding his shield in front of him and
contending in this way against his assailants until he and the great mass of
those with him were surrounded and slain. The remainder of his army was
thrown into confusion and butchered in crowds. So great was the slaughter
that it was impossible to count them. The Roman loss was about 1000. The
body of Spartacus was not found. A large number of his men fled from the
battle-field to the mountains and Crassus followed them thither. They
divided themselves in four parts, and continued to fight until they all
perished except 6000, who were captured and crucified along the whole road
from Capua to Rome. </p>
</div><div n="121" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Crassus accomplished his task within six months, whence arose a contention
for honors between himself and Pompey. Crassus did not dismiss his army, for
Pompey did not dismiss his. Both were candidates for the consulship. Crassus
had been praetor as the law of Sulla required. Pompey had been
neither praetor nor quaestor, and was only thirty-four
years old. He promised the tribunes of the people that much of their former
power should be restored. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R.
684</note> When they were chosen consuls they did not even <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0070">70</date></note> then dismiss their armies, which were stationed near
the city. Each one offered an excuse. Pompey said that he was waiting the
return of Metellus for his Spanish triumph. Crassus said that Pompey ought
to dismiss his army first. The people, seeing fresh seditions brewing and
fearing two armies encamped round about, besought the consuls, while they
were occupying the curule chairs in the forum, to be reconciled to each
other. At first both of them repelled these solicitations. When certain
persons, who seemed to be divinely inspired, predicted many direful
consequences if the consuls did not come to an agreement, the people again
implored them with lamentation and the greatest dejection, reminding them of
the evils produced by the contentions of Marius and Sulla. Crassus yielded
first. He came down from his chair, advanced to Pompey, and offered him his
hand in the way of reconciliation. Pompey rose and hastened to meet him.
They shook hands amid general acclamations and the people did not leave the
assembly until the consuls had given orders in writing to disband the
armies. Thus was the well-grounded fear of another great dissension happily
dispelled. This was about the sixtieth year in the course of the civil
convulsions, reckoning from the killing of Tiberius Gracchus. <figure>
<head>GAIUS MARIUS</head>
<figDesc>Visconti’s <title>Rom. Icon.</title> (Duruy)</figDesc>
</figure>
</p>
</div></div>
</div>
<div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="book">
<head>BOOK II</head>
 <div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER I</head>
<head>The Conspiracy of Catiline — Discovered by Cicero — The Conspirators
arrested, and put to Death—Battle of Pistoria and Death of Catiline</head>
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R.</note>
<div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>AFTER the reign of Sulla, and the later operations of <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C.</note> Sertorius and Perpenna in Spain,
other internal commotions of a similar nature took place among the Romans
until Gaius Caesar and Pompey the Great waged war against each
other, and Caesar made an end of Pompey and was himself killed in
the senate-chamber because he was accused of exercising royal power. How
these things came about and how both Pompey and Caesar lost their
lives, this second book of the Civil Wars will show. Pompey had <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 690</note> lately cleared the
sea of pirates, who were then more numerous <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0064">64</date></note> than ever before,
and afterward had overthrown Mithridates, king of Pontus, and regulated his
kingdom and the other nations that he had subdued in the East.
Caesar was still a young man, but powerful in speech and action,
daring in every way, ambitious of everything, and profuse beyond his means
in the pursuit of honors. While yet aedile and praetor he
had incurred great debts and had made himself wonderfully agreeable to the
multitude, who always sing the praises of those who are lavish in
expenditures. </p>
</div>
 <div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>At this time Lucius Catiline<note resp="translator">All
the codices say <hi rend="ital">Gaius</hi> Catiline. The Latin version of Candidus
says Lucius.</note> was a person of importance, of great celebrity, and
high birth, but a madman. It was believed that he had killed his own son
because of his own love for Aurelia Orestilla, who was not willing to marry
a man who had a son. He had been a friend and zealous partisan of Sulla. He
had reduced himself to 
<figure>
<head>CICERO</head>
<figDesc>In the Museum at Madrid (Bernoulli)</figDesc>
</figure>
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 690</note> poverty in order to gratify his ambition, but still he was <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0064">64</date></note> courted by the powerful, both men and women, and he became a candidate for the consulship as a step leading to absolute power. He confidently expected to be elected; but the suspicion of his ulterior designs defeated him, and Cicero, the most eloquent orator and the rhetorician of the period,<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 691</note> was chosen instead. Catiline, by way of raillery <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0063">63</date></note> and contempt for those who voted for him, called him <foreign xml:lang="lat">Novus Homo</foreign> (a new man) on account of his obscure birth (for so they call those who achieve distinction by their own merits and not by those of their ancestors); and because he was not born in the city he called him <foreign xml:lang="lat">Inquilinus</foreign> (a lodger), by which term they designate those who occupy houses belonging to others. From this time Catiline abstained wholly from politics as not leading quickly and surely to absolute power, but as full of the spirit of contention and malice. He procured much money from many women who hoped that their husbands would get killed in the uprising, and he formed a conspiracy with a number of senators and knights, and collected together a body of plebians, foreign residents, and slaves. His leading fellow-conspirators were Cornelius Lentulus and Cethegus, who were then city praetors. He sent emissaries throughout Italy to those of Sulla’s soldiers who had squandered the gains of their former life of plunder and who longed for similar doings. For this purpose he sent Gaius Manlius to Faesulae in Etruria and others to Picenum and Apulia, who enlisted soldiers for him secretly.</p></div>
 <div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="section">
 <p>All these facts, while they were still secret, were communicated to Cicero by Fulvia, a
woman of quality. Her lover, Quintus Curius, one of the conspirators
with Catiline, who had been expelled from the Senate for debauchery,
told his mistress in a vain and boastful way that he would soon be
in a position of great power. <note anchored="true" resp="HW"
place="foot"><q rend="double">He began to promise her seas and mountains,</q> says
Sallust (<bibl><title>Cat.</title> 23</bibl>).</note> And now a
rumor of what was transpiring in Italy was noised about.
Accordingly, Cicero stationed guards at intervals throughout the
city, and sent many of the nobility to the suspected places to watch
what was going on. Catiline, although nobody had ventured to lay
hands on him, because the <note anchored="true" resp="HW"
place="marg">Y.R. 691</note> facts were not yet publicly known,
was nevertheless fearful <note anchored="true" resp="HW"
place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0063">63</date></note> lest
suspicion should increase with time. Trusting to rapidity of
movement he forwarded money to Faesulae and directed his
fellow-conspirators to kill Cicero and set the city on fire at a
number of different places the same night. Then he departed to join
Gaius Manlius, intending to collect additional forces and invade the
city while burning. So extremely vain was he that he had the rods
and axes borne before him as though he were a proconsul, and he
proceeded on his journey to Manlius, enlisting soldiers as he went.
Lentulus and his fellow-conspirators decided that when they should
learn that Catiline had arrived at Faesulae, Lentulus and Cethegus
should present themselves at Cicero’s door early in the morning with
concealed daggers, expecting to be admitted because of their rank;
enter into conversation with him in the vestibule on some subject,
no matter what; draw him away from his own people, and kill him;
that Lucius Bestia, the tribune, should at once call an assembly of
the people by heralds and accuse Cicero of timidity and of stirring
up war and disturbing the city without cause, and that on the night
following Bestia’s speech the city should be set on fire by others
in twelve places and plundered, and the leading citizens killed. </p></div>
<div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Such were the designs of Lentulus, Cethegus, Statilius, and Cassius, the
chiefs of the conspiracy, and they waited for the appointed time. Meanwhile
ambassadors of the Allobroges, who were in the city making complaint against
their magistrates, were solicited to join the conspiracy of Lentulus in
order to cause an uprising against the Romans in Gaul. Lentulus sent in
company with them, to Catiline, a man of Croton named Vulturcius, who
carried letters without signatures. The Allobroges being in doubt
communicated the matter to Fabius Sanga, the patron of their state—it was
the custom of all the subject states to have patrons at Rome. Sanga
communicated the facts to Cicero, who captured the Allobroges and Vulturcius
on their journey and brought them straightway before the Senate.<note resp="translator">Sallust says that the Allobroges
were privy to their own arrest, which took place on the Milvian bridge,
and that they made no resistance, but that Vulturcius fought till he was
overpowered. (<title>Cat.</title> 45.)</note> They confessed to their
understanding with Lentulus and testified in his presence that Cornelius
Lentulus had often said that it was written in the book of fate that three
Cornelii should be monarchs of Rome, two of whom, Cinna and Sulla, had
already been such. </p>
</div><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When they had so testified the Senate deprived Lentulus of his office. Cicero
put each of the conspirators under arrest at the houses of the
praetors, and returned directly to take the vote of the Senate
concerning them. In the meantime there was a great tumult around the
senate-house, the affair being as yet little understood, and those who did
understand it being alarmed. The slaves and freedmen of Lentulus and
Cethegus, reënforced by numerous artisans, made a circuit by back
streets and assaulted the houses of the praetors in order to rescue
their masters. When Cicero heard of this he hurried out of the senate-house
and stationed the necessary guards and then came back and hastened the
taking of the vote. Silanus, the consul-elect, spoke first, as it was the
custom among the Romans for the one who was about to assume that office to
deliver his opinion first, because, as I think, he would have most to do
with the execution of the decrees, and hence would give more careful
consideration and circumspection to each. It was the opinion of Silanus that
the culprits should suffer the extreme penalty, and many senators agreed
with him until it came Nero’s turn to deliver his opinion. Nero judged that
it would be best to keep them under guard until Catiline should be beaten in
the field and they could obtain the most accurate knowledge of the facts. </p>
</div><div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Gaius Caesar was not free from the suspicion of complicity with
these men, but Cicero did not venture to bring into the controversy one so
popular with the masses. Caesar proposed that Cicero should
distribute the culprits among the towns of Italy, according to his own
discretion, to be kept until Catiline should be beaten in fight, and that
then they should be regularly tried, instead of inflicting an irremediable
punishment upon members of the nobility in advance of argument and trial. As
this opinion appeared to be just and acceptable, most of the senators
changed completely, until Cato openly manifested his suspicion of
Caesar; and Cicero, who had apprehensions concerning the coming
night (lest the crowd who were concerned with the conspiracy and were still
in the forum in a state of suspense, fearful for themselves and the
conspirators, might do something desperate), persuaded the Senate to give
judgment against them without trial as persons caught in the act. Cicero
immediately, while the Senate was still in session, conducted each of the
conspirators from the houses where they were in custody to the prison,
without the knowledge of the crowd, and saw them put to death. Then he went
back to the forum and signified that they were dead. The crowd dispersed in
alarm, congratulating themselves that they had not been found out. Thus the
city breathed freely once more after the great fear that had weighed upon it
that day. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 692</note>
</p>
</div><div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Catiline had assembled about 20,000 troops, of whom <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0062">62</date></note>
one-fourth part were already armed, and was moving toward Gaul in order to
complete his preparations, when Antonius, the other consul, overtook him
beyond the Alps<note resp="translator">The battle was
fought at Pistoria, at the southern base of the Apennines. The Roman
army was commanded, not by the consul Antonius, but by his lieutenant
Petreius, who is described by Sallust as one who had <q rend="double">served with great
reputation for more than thirty years as military tribune, prefect,
lieutenant, or praetor.</q> Moreover it was a desperate and bloody
engagement. (<title>Cat.</title> 57-<date when="-0061">61</date>.)</note>
and easily defeated the madly conceived adventure of the man, which was
still more madly put to the test without preparation. Neither Catiline nor
any of the nobility who were associated with him deigned to fly, but all
perished at close quarters with their enemies. Such was the end of the
uprising of Catiline, which almost brought the city to the extreme of peril.
Cicero, who had been hitherto distinguished only for eloquence, was now in
everybody’s mouth as a man of action, and was considered unquestionably the
saviour of his country on the eve of its destruction, for which reason the
thanks of the assembly were bestowed upon him, amid general acclamations. At
the instance of Cato the people saluted him as the Father of his Country.
Some think that this appellation, which is now bestowed upon those emperors
who are deemed worthy of it, had its beginning with Cicero. Although they
are in fact kings, it is not given to them with their other titles
immediately upon their accession, but is decreed to them in the progress of
time, not as a matter of course, but as a final testimonial of the greatest
services.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER II</head>
<head>Caesar in Spain—The Triumvirate of Caesar, Pompey, and
Crassus—Caesar’s Agrarian Law—Tumult in the City—Cato
ejected from the Forum — The Affair of Vettius — Caesar
conciliates the Knights — Is appointed Governor of Gaul — Gives his
Daughter in Marriage to Pompey</head>
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 693</note>
<div n="8" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Caesar, who had been chosen praetor for Spain, was <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. 61</note> detained in the
city by his creditors, as he owed much more than he could pay, by reason of
his political expenses. He was reported as saying that he needed 25,000,000
sesterces<note resp="translator">About
$1,250,000.</note> in order to have nothing at all. However, he arranged
with those who were detaining him as best he could and proceeded to Spain.
Here he neglected the transaction of public business, the administration of
justice, and all matters of that kind because he considered them of no use
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 694</note> to his
purposes, but he raised an army and attacked the <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0060">60</date></note>
independent Spanish tribes one by one until he made the whole country
tributary to the Romans. He also sent much money to the public treasury at
Rome. For these reasons the Senate awarded him a triumph. He was making
preparations outside the walls for a most splendid procession, during the
days when candidates for the consulship were required to present themselves.
It was not lawful for one who was going to have a triumph to enter the city
and then go back again for the triumph. As Caesar was very anxious
to secure the office, and his procession was not yet ready, he sent to the
Senate and asked permission to stand for the consulship while absent,
through the intercession of friends, for although he knew it was against the
law it had been done by others. Cato opposed his proposition and used up the
last day for the presentation of candidates, in speech making. Thereupon
Caesar abandoned his triumph, entered the city, offered himself as
a candidate, and waited for the comitia. </p>
</div><div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In the meantime Pompey, who had acquired great glory and power by his
Mithridatic war, was asking the Senate to ratify numerous concessions that
he had granted to kings, princes, and cities. Many senators, however, moved
by envy, made opposition, and especially Lucullus, who had held the command
against Mithridates before Pompey, and who considered that the victory was
his, since he had left the king in a state of extreme weakness for Pompey.
Crassus coöperated with Lucullus in this matter. Pompey was
indignant and made friends with Caesar and promised under oath to
support him for the consulship. The latter thereupon brought Crassus into
friendly relations with Pompey. Thus these three most powerful men
coöperated together for their mutual advantage. This coalition the
Roman writer Varro treated in a book entitled <title>Tricaranus</title> (the
three-headed monster).<note resp="translator">
<foreign xml:lang="grc">Τρικάρανον.</foreign>—The original
<title>Tricaranus</title> was a famous satire against the
<emph>three</emph> cities of Athens, Sparta, and Thebes,
written by Anaximenes of Lampsacus and by him falsely attributed to the
historian Theopompus in order to bring the latter into disrepute in
those cities. By a skilful imitation of the style of Theopompus it had
the intended effect. (Pausanias, <title>Description of Greece,</title>
vi. 18, 2.)</note> The Senate had its suspicions of them and elected
Lucius Bibulus as Caesar’s colleague to hold him in check. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 695</note>
</p>
</div><div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Strife sprang up between them immediately and they proceeded to arm
themselves secretly against each other. Caesar, who was a master of
dissimulation, made speeches in the Senate in the interest of harmony with
Bibulus, as though he were taking care lest harm should come to the republic
from their disagreement. As he was believed to be sincere, Bibulus was
thrown off his guard. While Bibulus was unprepared and suspecting nothing,
Caesar secretly got a large band of soldiers in readiness and
brought before the Senate measures for the relief of the poor by the
distribution of the public land to them. The best part of this land around
Capua,<note resp="translator">This land had been
public domain ever since the second Punic war. (
<title>Velleius,</title> ii. 44.)</note> which was leased for the
public benefit, he proposed to bestow upon those who were the fathers of at
least three children, by which means he bought for himself the favor of a
multitude of men. Twenty-thousand, who had three children each, came forward
at once. As many senators opposed his motion he <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0059">59</date></note> pretended
to be indignant at their injustice, and rushed out of the Senate and did not
convene it again for the remainder of the year,<note resp="translator"><q rend="double">Appian and Dion are wrong in affirming that he
ceased to assemble the Senate; for he called them together several
times, among others to make them swear to observe his law and to declare
Ptolemy and Ariovistus friends of the Roman people,</q> etc.
(<title>Duruy,</title> iii. 206.)</note> but harangued the people
from the rostra. In a public assembly he asked Pompey and Crassus what they
thought about his proposed laws. Both gave their approval, and the people
came to the voting-place carrying concealed daggers. </p>
</div><div n="11" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The Senate (since no one called it together and it was not lawful for one
consul to do so without the consent of the other) assembled at the house of
Bibulus, but did nothing to counteract the force and preparation of
Caesar. They planned, however, that Bibulus should oppose
Caesar’s laws, so that they should seem to be overcome by force
rather than by their own negligence. Accordingly, Bibulus burst into the
forum while Caesar was still speaking. Strife and tumult arose,
blows were given, and those who had daggers broke the fasces and insignia of
Bibulus and wounded some of the tribunes who stood around him. Bibulus was
in no wise terrified, but bared his neck to Caesar’s partisans and
loudly called on them to strike. <q rend="double">If I cannot persuade Caesar to do
right,</q> he said, <q rend="double">I will affix upon him the guilt and stigma of my death.</q> 
His friends, however, led him, against his will, out of the crowd and into
the neighboring temple of Jupiter Stator. Cato was indignant at these
proceedings, and, being a young man, forced his way to the midst of the
crowd and began to make a speech, but was lifted up and dragged out by
Caesar’s partisans. Then he went around secretly by another street
and again mounted the rostra; but as he despaired of making a speech, since
nobody would listen to him, he abused Caesar roundly until he was
ejected by the Caesarians, and Caesar secured the
enactment of his laws. </p>
</div><div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The plebeians swore to observe these laws forever, and Caesar
directed the Senate to do the same. Many of them, including Cato, refused,
and Caesar proposed and the people enacted the death penalty to the
recusants. Then they became alarmed and took the oath, including the
tribunes,<note resp="translator">The text is
somewhat confused here. Mendelssohn suspects a lacuna.</note> for it was
no longer of any use to speak against it after the law had been confirmed by
the others. And now Vettius, a plebeian, ran into the forum with a drawn
dagger and said that he had been sent by Bibulus, Cicero, and Cato to kill
Caesar and Pompey, and that the dagger had been given to him by
Postumius, the lictor of Bibulus. Although this affair was open to suspicion
on both sides, Caesar made use of it to inflame the multitude and
postponed the examination of the assailant. Vettius was thrown into prison
and killed the same night. As this transaction was variously commented on,
Caesar did not let it pass unnoticed, but said that it had been
done by the opposite party who were afraid of exposure.<note resp="translator">
<foreign xml:lang="grc">τοὺς δεδιότας,</foreign> <q rend="double">those who were
afraid.</q> Mendelssohn suggests the addition of <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀντιστασιώτας,</foreign> <q rend="double">the opposite party,</q> to complete the
sense.</note> Finally, the people furnished him a guard to protect him
against conspirators, and Bibulus abstained from public business altogether,
like a private citizen, and did not go out of his house for the remainder of
his official term. </p>
</div><div n="13" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As Caesar now had the sole administration of public affairs, he did
not make any further inquiry concerning Vettius. He brought forward new laws
to win the favor of the multitude, and caused all of Pompey’s acts to be
ratified, as he had promised him. The so-called knights, who held the middle
place in rank between the Senate and the plebeians, and were extremely
powerful in all ways by reason of their wealth, and of the farming of the
provincial revenues which they contracted for, and who kept for this purpose
multitudes of very trusty servants, had been asking the Senate for a long
time to release them from a part of what they owed to the treasury. The
Senate was consuming time on this question. As Caesar did not want
anything of the Senate then, but was employing the people only, he released
the publicans from a third part of their contracts. For this unexpected
favor, which was far beyond their deserts, the knights extolled
Caesar to the skies. Thus a more powerful body of defenders than
that of the plebeians was added to Caesar’s support through one
political act. He gave spectacles and combats of wild beasts beyond his
means, borrowing money on all sides, and surpassing all former exhibitions
in lavish display and splendid gifts, in consequence of which he was
appointed governor of both Cisalpine and Transalpine Gaul for five years,
with the command of four legions. </p>
</div><div n="14" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As Caesar saw that he would be away from home a long time, and
believed that envy would be in proportion to benefits conferred, he gave his
daughter in marriage to Pompey, although she was betrothed to
Caepio, because he feared that even a friend might become envious
of his great success. He promoted the boldest of his partisans to the
principal offices for the ensuing year. He designated his friend Aulus
Gabinius as consul, with Lucius Piso as his colleague, whose daughter,
Calpurnia, Caesar married, although Cato cried out that the
government was debauched by marriages. For tribunes he chose Vatinius and
Clodius Pulcher, although the latter had been suspected of an amour with the
wife of Caesar himself during a religious ceremony of women,<note resp="translator">See vol. i. p. 47.</note> but whom
Caesar did not bring to trial because Clodius was very popular with
the masses; but he divorced his wife. Others prosecuted Clodius for impiety
at the sacred rites, and Cicero made the argument for the prosecution. When
Caesar was called as a witness he refused to testify against
Clodius, but even raised him to the tribuneship as a foil to Cicero who was
already decrying the triumvirate as tending toward monarchy. Thus
Caesar turned a private grievance to useful account and benefited
one enemy in order to revenge himself on another. It appears, however, that
Clodius had previously requited Caesar by helping him to secure the
governorship of Gaul. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER III</head>
<head>Clodius prosecutes Cicero for putting Citizens to Death without Trial —
Cicero banished and recalled—Caesar’s Conference at
Lucca—Bloodshed in the Forum—The Triumvirs divide the
Government—Death of Caesar’s Daughter — Shocking State of
Roman Political Life — Pompey and Milo — Assassination of Clodius —
Disorders consequent thereon—Pompey made Sole Consul—His Law against
Bribery</head>
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 696</note>
<div n="15" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Such were the acts of Caesar’s consulship. He then <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0058">58</date></note> laid down his magistracy and proceeded directly to his
new government. Clodius now brought an accusation against Cicero for putting
Lentulus and Cethegus and their followers to death without trial.<note resp="translator">The question whether Cicero was
justified under Roman law in putting the conspirators to death without a
trial has been the subject of endless controversy. It is treated with
great force and clearness by Mr. Strachan-Davidson in his <title>Life of
Cicero</title> (p. 151 <emph>seq.</emph>), who holds that he
was so justified.</note> Cicero, who had exhibited the highest courage
in that transaction, became utterly unnerved at his trial. He put on coarse
raiment and, defiled with squalor and dirt, supplicated those whom he met in
the streets, not being ashamed to annoy people who knew nothing about the
business, so that his doings excited laughter rather than pity by reason of
his unseemly aspect. Into such trepidation did he fall at this single trial
of his own, although he had been managing other people’s causes successfully
all his life. In like manner they say that Demosthenes the Athenian did not
stand his ground when accused, but fled before the trial. When Clodius
interrupted Cicero’s supplications on the streets with contumely, he gave
way to despair and, like Demosthenes, went into voluntary exile. A multitude
of his friends went out of the city with him, and the Senate recommended him
to the attention of cities, kings, and princes. Clodius demolished his house
and his villas. Clodius was so much elated by this affair that he compared
himself with Pompey, who was then the most powerful man in Rome. </p>
</div><div n="16" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Accordingly, Pompey held out to Milo, who was Clodius’ colleague in office
and a bolder spirit than himself, the hope of the consulship, and incited
him against Clodius, and directed him to procure a vote for the recall of
Cicero. He hoped that when Cicero should come back he would no longer speak
against the existing status (the triumvirate), remembering what he had
suffered, but would make trouble for Clodius and bring punishment upon him.
Thus Cicero, who had been exiled by means of Pompey, <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 697</note> was recalled by means of Pompey
about sixteen months <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0057">57</date></note> after his banishment, and the Senate
rebuilt his house and his villas at the public expense. He was received
magnificently at the city gates. It is said that a whole day was consumed by
the greetings extended to him, as was the case with Demosthenes when he
returned. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 698</note>
</p>
</div><div n="17" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In the meantime Caesar, who had performed the <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0056">56</date></note> many
brilliant exploits in Gaul and Britain which have been described in my
Celtic history, had returned with vast riches to Cisalpine Gaul on the river
Po to give his army a short respite from continuous fighting. From this
place he sent large sums of money to many persons in Rome, to those who were
holding the yearly offices and to persons otherwise distinguished as
governors and generals, and they went thither by turns to meet him.<note resp="translator">Plutarch (<title>Life of
Caesar,</title> 21) says that this conference took place at
Lucca. He mentions the same number of lictors and of senators in
attendance as those in the text.</note> So many of them came that 120
lictors could be seen around him at one time, and more than 200 senators,
some returning thanks for what they had already received, others asking for
money or seeking some other advantage for themselves from the same quarter.
All things were now possible to Caesar by reason of his large army,
his great riches, and his readiness to oblige everybody. Pompey and Crassus,
his partners in the triumvirate, came also. In their conference it was
decided that Pompey and Crassus should be elected consuls again and that
Caesar’s governorship over his provinces should be extended for
five years more. Thereupon they separated and Domitius Ahenobarbus offered
himself as a candidate for the consulship against Pompey. When the appointed
day came, both went down to the Campus Martius before daylight to attend the
comitia. Their followers got into an altercation and came to blows, and
finally somebody assaulted the torchbearer of Domitius with a sword. There
was a scattering straightway, and Domitius escaped with difficulty to his
own house. Even Pompey’s clothing was carried home stained with blood, so
great was the danger incurred by both candidates. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 699</note>
</p>
</div><div n="18" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Accordingly, Pompey and Crassus were chosen consuls <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0055">55</date></note> and
Caesar’s governorship was extended for five years according to the
agreement. The provinces were allotted with an army to each consul in the
following manner: Pompey chose Spain and Africa, but sent friends to take
charge of them, he himself remaining in Rome. Crassus took Syria and the
adjacent country because he wanted a war with the Parthians, which he
thought would be easy as well as glorious and gainful. But when he took his
departure from the city there were many unfavorable omens, and the tribunes
forbade the war against the Parthians, who had done no wrong to the Romans.
As he would not obey, they invoked public imprecations on him, which Crassus
disregarded; wherefore he perished in Parthia, together with his son of the
same name, and his army, not quite 10,000 of whom, out of 100,000, escaped
to Syria. The disaster to Crassus will be described in my Parthian history.
As the Romans were suffering from scarcity, they appointed Pompey the sole
manager of the grain supply and gave him, as in his operations against the
pirates, twenty assistants from the Senate. These he distributed in like
manner among the provinces while he superintended the whole, and thus Rome
was very soon provided with abundant supplies, by which means Pompey again
gained great reputation and power. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 700</note>
</p>
</div><div n="19" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>About this time the daughter of Caesar, who was married to Pompey,
died in childbirth, and fear fell upon all lest, with the termination of
this marriage connection, Caesar and Pompey with their great armies
should come into conflict with each other, especially as the commonwealth
had been for a long time disorderly and unmanageable. The magistrates were
chosen by means of money, and faction fights, with dishonest zeal, with the
aid of stones and even swords. Bribery and corruption prevailed in the most
scandalous manner. The people themselves went to the elections to be bought.
A case was found where a deposit of 800 talents had been made to obtain the
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0054">54</date></note> consulship. The consuls holding office yearly
could not hope to lead armies or to command in war because they were shut
out by the power of the triumvirate. The baser ones strove for gain, instead
of military commands, at the expense of the public treasury or from the
election of their own successors. For these reasons good men abstained from
office altogether. The disorder was such that at one time the republic was
without consuls for eight months, Pompey conniving at the state of affairs
in order that there might be need of a dictator. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 701</note>
</p>
</div><div n="20" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Many citizens began to talk to each other about this, <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0053">53</date></note> saying
that the only remedy for existing evils was the one-man power, but that
there was need of a man who combined strength of character and mildness of
temper, thereby indicating Pompey, who had a sufficient army under his
command and who appeared to be both a friend of the people and a leader of
the Senate by virtue of his rank, a man of temperance and self-control and
easy of access, or at all events so considered. This expectation of a
dictatorship Pompey discountenanced in words, but in fact he did everything
secretly to promote it, and willingly overlooked the prevailing disorder and
the interregnum consequent upon it. Milo, who had assisted him in his
controversy with Clodius, and had acquired great popularity by the recall of
Cicero, now sought the consulship, as he considered it a favorable time in
view of the present interregnum; but <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 702</note> Pompey kept postponing the comitia until
Milo became <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0052">52</date></note> disgusted, believing that Pompey was
false to him, and withdrew to his native town of Lanuvium, which they say
was the first city founded in Italy by Diomedes on his return from Troy, and
which is situated about 150 stades from Rome. </p>
</div><div n="21" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Clodius happened to be coming from his own country-seat on horseback and he
met Milo at Bovillae. They merely exchanged hostile scowls and
passed along; but one of Milo’s servants attacked Clodius, either because he
was ordered to do so or because he wanted to kill his master’s enemy, and
stabbed him through the back with a dagger. Clodius’ groom carried him
bleeding into a neighboring inn. Milo followed with his servants and
finished him, — whether he was still alive, or already dead, is not known,
— for, although he claimed that he had neither advised nor ordered the
killing, he was not willing to leave the deed unfinished because he knew
that he would be accused in any event. When the news of this affair was
circulated in Rome, the people were thunderstruck, and they passed the night
in the forum. When daylight came, the corpse of Clodius was displayed on the
rostra. Some of the tribunes and the friends of Clodius and a great crowd
with them seized it and carried it to the senate-house, either to confer
honor upon it, as he was of senatorial birth, or as an act of contumely to
the Senate for conniving at such deeds. There the more reckless ones
collected the benches and chairs of the senators and made a funeral pile for
him, which they lighted and from which the senate-house and many buildings
in the neighborhood caught fire and were consumed with the corpse of
Clodius. </p>
</div><div n="22" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Such was the hardihood of Milo that he was moved less by fear of punishment
for the murder than by indignation at the honor bestowed upon Clodius at his
funeral. He collected a crowd of slaves and rustics, and, after sending some
money to be distributed among the people and buying Marcus Caelius,
one of the tribunes, he came back to the city with the greatest boldness.
Directly he entered, Caelius dragged him to the forum to be tried
by those whom he had bribed, as though by an assembly of the people,
pretending to be very indignant and not willing to grant any delay, but
hoping that if those present should acquit him he would escape a more
regular trial. Milo said that the deed was not premeditated, since one would
not set out with such intentions encumbered with his luggage and his wife.
The remainder of his speech was directed against Clodius as a desperado and
a friend of desperadoes, who had set fire to the senate-house and burned it
to ashes with his body. While he was still speaking the other tribunes, with
the unbribed portion of the people, burst into the forum armed.
Caelius and Milo escaped disguised as slaves, but there was a heavy
slaughter of the others. Search was not made for the friends of Milo, but
all who were met with, whether citizens or strangers, were killed, and
especially those who wore fine clothes and gold rings. As the government was
without order these ruffians, who were for the most part slaves and were
armed men against unarmed, indulged their rage and, making an excuse of the
tumult that had broken out, they turned to pillage. They abstained from no
crime, but broke into houses, looking for any kind of portable property, but
pretending to be searching for the friends of Milo. For several days Milo
was their excuse for burning, stoning, and every sort of outrage. </p>
</div><div n="23" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The Senate assembled in consternation and looked to Pompey, intending to make
him dictator at once, for they considered this necessary as a cure for the
present evils; but at the suggestion of Cato they appointed him consul
without a colleague, so that by ruling alone he might have the power of a
dictator with the responsibility of a consul. He was the first of consuls
who had two of the greatest provinces, and an army, and the public money,
and the one-man power in the city, by virtue of being sole consul. In order
that Cato might not cause obstruction by his presence, it was decreed that
he should go to Cyprus and take the island away from King Ptolemy—a law to
that effect having been enacted by Clodius because once, when he was
captured by pirates, the avaricious Ptolemy contributed only two talents for
his ransom. When Ptolemy heard of the decree he threw his money into the sea
and killed himself, and Cato settled the government of Cyprus. Pompey
proposed the prosecution of offenders and especially of those guilty of
bribery and corruption. He thought that the seat of the public disorder was
there, and that by beginning there he should effect a speedy cure. He
brought forward a law, that any citizen who chose to do so might call for an
accounting from anybody who had held office from the time of his own first
consulship to the present. This embraced a period of a little less than
twenty years, during which Caesar also had been consul; wherefore
Caesar’s friends suspected that he included so long a time in order
to cast reproach and contumely on Caesar, and urged him to
straighten out the present crookedness rather than stir up the past to the
annoyance of so many distinguished men, among whom they named
Caesar. Pompey pretended to be indignant at the mention of
Caesar’s name, as though he were above suspicion, and said that his
own second consulship was embraced in the period, and that he had reached
back a considerable time in order to effect a complete cure of the evils
from which the republic had been so long wasting away.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER IV</head>
<head>Prosecutions for Bribery — Caesar authorized to stand for the
Consulship while absent—Enmity of Marcellus—Attempts to deprive
Caesar of his Command — Curio insists that Pompey shall lay
down his Command also — Increasing Hostility to Caesar in the
Senate — Pompey’s Neglect of Preparations for War—The Consuls invest
Pompey with the Defence of Italy</head>
<div n="24" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After making this answer he passed his law, and straightway there ensued a
great number and variety of prosecutions. In order that the jurors might act
without fear Pompey stationed soldiers around them and superintended them in
person. The first ones convicted were absentees: Milo for the murder of
Clodius; Gabinius both for violation of law and for impiety, because he had
invaded Egypt without a decree of the Senate and contrary to the Sibylline
books; Hypsaeus, Memmius, Sextius, and many others for bribery and
for corrupting the populace. The people interceded for Scaurus, but Pompey
made proclamation that they should wait for the decision of the court. When
the crowd again interrupted the accusers, Pompey’s soldiers made a charge
and killed several. Then the people held their tongues and Scaurus was
convicted. All of them were banished. Gabinius was fined in addition. The
Senate praised Pompey highly for these proceedings, voted him two more
legions, and extended the term of his provincial government. As Pompey’s law
offered impunity to any one who should turn state’s evidence, Memmius, who
had been convicted of bribery, called Lucius Scipio, the father-in-law of
Pompey himself, to trial for like participation in bribery. Thereupon Pompey
put on mourning and many of the jurors did the same. Memmius took pity on
the republic and withdrew the accusation. </p>
</div><div n="25" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompey, as though he had completed the reforms that made the one-man power
necessary, now made Scipio his colleague in the consulship for the remainder
of the year. At the expiration of his term, however, although others were
invested with the consulship, he was none the less the supervisor, and
ruler, and all-in-all in Rome. He enjoyed the good-will of the Senate,
particularly because they were jealous of Caesar, who did not
consult the Senate during his consulship, and because Pompey had so speedily
restored the sick commonwealth, and had not made himself troublesome or
offensive to any of them during his term of office. The banished ones went
to Caesar in crowds and advised him to beware of Pompey, saying
that his law about bribery was especially directed against himself.
Caesar cheered them up and spoke well of Pompey. He also induced
the tribunes to bring in a law to enable himself to stand for the consulship
a second time while absent, and this was enacted while Pompey was still
consul and without opposition from him. Caesar suspected that the
Senate would resist this project and feared lest he should be reduced to the
condition of a private citizen and exposed <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 703</note> to his enemies. So he tried to retain his
power <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0051">51</date></note> until he should be elected consul, and asked the
Senate to grant him a little more time in his present command of Gaul, or of
a part of it. Marcellus, who succeeded Pompey as consul, forbade it. They
say that when this was announced to Caesar, he clapped his hand on
his sword-hilt and exclaimed, <q rend="double">This shall give it to me.</q><note resp="translator">This is a highly improbable tale.
Caesar was not in the least given to theatrical display.
Plutarch (<title>Life of Caesar,</title> 29) says: <q rend="double">It is said
that one of Caesar’s centurions, who had been sent by him to
Rome, standing before the senate-house one day, and being told that the
Senate would not give a longer time in his government, clapped his hand
on the hilt of his sword and said, <q rend="single">But this shall give it.</q></q></note>
</p>
</div><div n="26" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Caesar built the town of Novum Comum<note resp="translator">The modern Como. Strabo (v. I. 6) says that Pompeius
Strabo, the father of Pompey the Great, restored Como, which was then a
town of moderate size oppressed by the neighboring Rhetians; that Gains
Scipio added about 3000 to its population, and that Caesar
added 5000 more, the most distinguished of whom were 500 Greeks. <q rend="double">To the
latter,</q> he continues, <q rend="double">Caesar gave the right of citizenship
and inscribed them among the colonists, but they did not live there
permanently, although they gave the name to the settlement. All the
inhabitants are called Neocomitae which, by interpretation,
means the people of Novum Comum.</q> So it appears that the place was
recruited by Caesar, not originally founded by him.</note> at
the foot of the Alps and gave it the Latin rights, which included a
provision that those who had exercised the yearly chief magistracy should be
Roman citizens. One of these men, who had held this office and was
consequently considered a Roman citizen, was beaten with rods for some
reason by order of Marcellus in defiance of Caesar—a punishment
that was never inflicted on Roman citizens. Marcellus in his passion
revealed his real intention that the blows should be the marks of the
foreigner, and he told the man to carry his scars and show them to
Caesar. So insulting was Marcellus. Moreover, he proposed to send
successors to take command of Caesar’s provinces before his time
had expired, but Pompey interfered, making a pretence of fairness and
good-will, saying that they ought not to put an indignity on a distinguished
man who had been so extremely useful to his country, merely on account of a
short interval of time; but he made it plain that Caesar’s command
must come to an end immediately on its expiration. For this <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 704</note> reason the
bitterest enemies of Caesar were chosen consuls <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0050">50</date></note> for the ensuing year: Aemilius Paulus and
Claudius Marcellus, cousin of the Marcellus before mentioned. Curio, who was
also a bitter enemy of Caesar, but extremely popular with the
masses and a most accomplished speaker, was chosen tribune. Caesar
was not able to influence Claudius with money, but he bought the neutrality
of Paulus for 1500 talents and the assistance of
Curio with a still larger sum, because he knew that the latter was heavily
burdened with debt. With the money thus obtained Paulus built and dedicated
to the Roman people the Basilica that bears his name, a very beautiful
structure. </p>
</div><div n="27" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Curio, in order that he might not be detected changing sides too suddenly,
brought forward vast plans for repairing and building roads, of which he was
to be superintendent for five years. He knew that he could not carry any
such measure, but he hoped that Pompey’s friends would oppose him so that he
might have that as an excuse for opposing Pompey. Things turned out as he
had anticipated, so that he had a pretext for disagreement. Claudius
proposed the sending of successors to take command of Caesar’s
provinces, as his term was now expiring. Paulus was silent. Curio, who was
thought to differ from both, praised the motion of Claudius, but added that
Pompey ought to resign his provinces and army just like Caesar, for
in this way he said the commonwealth would be made free and be relieved from
fear in all directions. Many opposed this as unjust, because Pompey’s term
had not yet expired. Then Curio came out more openly and decidedly against
appointing successors to Caesar unless Pompey also should lay down
his command; for since they were both suspicious of each other, he contended
that there could be no lasting peace to the commonwealth unless both were
reduced to the character of private citizens. He said this because he knew
that Pompey would not give up his command and because he saw that the people
were incensed against Pompey on account of his prosecutions for bribery. As
Curio’s position was plausible, the plebeians praised him as the only one
who was willing to incur the enmity of both Pompey and Caesar in
order to fulfil worthily his duties as a citizen; and once they escorted him
home like an athlete, scattering flowers, as though he had won the prize in
some great and difficult contest, for nothing was considered more perilous
then than to have a difference with Pompey. </p>
</div><div n="28" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompey, while lying sick in Italy,<note resp="translator">Cicero makes mention of this illness of Pompey in the <title>Tusculan
Disputations</title> (i. 35).</note> wrote an artful letter to the
Senate, praising Caesar’s exploits and also recounting his own from
the beginning, saying that he had been invested with a third consulship, and
with provinces and an army afterward, which he had not solicited, but had
been called to serve the public weal. He added that the powers which he had
accepted unwillingly he would gladly yield to those who wished to take them
back, and would not wait the time fixed for their expiration. The artfulness
of this communication consisted in showing the fairness of Pompey and in
exciting prejudice against Caesar, as though the latter was not
willing to give up his command even at the appointed time. When Pompey came
back to the city, he spoke to the senators in the same way and then, also,
promised to lay down his command. As a friend and marriage connection of
Caesar he said that the latter would very cheerfully do the same,
for his had been a long and laborious contest against very warlike peoples;
he had added much to the Roman power and now he would come back to his
honors and his sacrificings<note resp="translator">
<foreign xml:lang="grc">θυσίας,</foreign> <q rend="double">sacrificings.</q> This refers,
says Combes-Dounous, to Caesar’s duties as Pontifex Maximus, a
life office, to which he had been chosen in his younger days.</note> and
take his rest. He said these things in order that successors to
Caesar might be sent at once, while he (Pompey) should merely stand
on his promise. Curio exposed his artifice, saying that promises were not
sufficient, and insisting that Pompey should lay down his command now and
that Caesar should not be disarmed until Pompey himself had
returned to private life. On account of private enmity, he said, it would
not be advisable either for Caesar or for the Romans that such
great authority should be held by one man. Rather should each of them have
power against the other in case one should attempt violence against the
commonwealth. Throwing off all disguise, he denounced Pompey unsparingly as
one aiming at supreme power, and said that unless he would lay down his
command now, when he had the fear of Caesar before his eyes, he
would never lay it down at all. He moved that, unless they both obeyed, both
should be voted public enemies and military forces be levied against them.
In this way he concealed the fact that he had been bought by
Caesar. </p>
</div><div n="29" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompey was angry with him and threatened him and at once withdrew indignantly
to his country-seat. The Senate now had suspicions of both, but it
considered Pompey the better republican of the two, and it hated
Caesar because he had not shown it proper respect during his
consulship. Some of the senators really thought that it would not be safe to
the commonwealth to deprive Pompey of his power until after Caesar
should lay down his, since the latter was outside of the city and was the
man of more towering designs. Curio held the contrary opinion, that they had
need of Caesar against the power of Pompey, or otherwise that both
armies should be disbanded at the same time. As the Senate would not agree
with him he dismissed it, leaving the whole business still unfinished. He
had the power to do so as tribune. Thus Pompey had occasion to regret that
he had restored the tribunician power to its pristine vigor after it had
been reduced to extreme feebleness by Sulla. Nevertheless, one decree was
voted before the session was ended, and that was that Caesar and
Pompey should each send one legion of soldiers to Syria to defend the
province on account of the disaster to Crassus. Pompey artfully recalled.
the legion that he had lately lent to Caesar on account of the
disaster to Caesar’s two generals, Titurius and Cotta.
Caesar awarded to each soldier 250 drachmas and sent the legion to
Rome together with another of his own. As the expected danger did not show
itself in Syria, these legions were sent into winter quarters at Capua. </p>
</div><div n="30" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The persons who had been sent by Pompey to Caesar to bring these
legions spread many reports derogatory to Caesar and repeated them
to Pompey. They said that Caesar’s army was wasted by protracted
service, that the soldiers longed for their homes and would change to the
side of Pompey as soon as they should cross the Alps. They spoke in this way
either from ignorance or because they were corrupted. In fact, every soldier
was strongly attached to Caesar and labored zealously for him,
under the force of discipline and the influence of the gain which war
usually brings to victors and which they received from Caesar also;
for he gave with ar lavish hand in order to mould them to his designs. They
knew what his designs were, but they stood by him nevertheless. Pompey
believed what was reported to him and collected neither soldiers nor
apparatus suitable for so great a contest.<note resp="translator">A parallel passage in Plutarch says that <q rend="double">when some were
saying that if Caesar should turn his forces against the city,
they could not see what power would be able to resist him, Pompey
smiled, and with great unconcern bade them take no care of that, <q rend="single">for,</q>
 he said, <q rend="single">whenever I stamp upon the ground in any part of Italy there
will rise up forces enough both horse and foot.</q></q> (<title>Life of
Pompey,</title> 57.)</note> In the Senate the opinion of each member
was asked and Claudius craftily divided the question and took the votes
separately, thus: <q rend="double">Shall successors be sent to Caesar?</q> and again,
 <q rend="double">Shall Pompey be deprived of his command?</q> The majority voted against the
latter proposition, and it was decreed that successors to Caesar
should be sent. Then Curio put the question whether both should lay down
their commands, and 22 senators voted in the negative while 370 went back to
the opinion of Curio in order to avoid civil discord.<note resp="translator">Mendelssohn marks the text at this place <foreign xml:lang="lat">turbata.</foreign></note> Then Claudius dismissed the
Senate, exclaiming, <q rend="double">Enjoy your victory and have Caesar for a
master.</q> </p>
</div><div n="31" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Suddenly a false rumor came that Caesar had crossed the Alps and was
marching on the city, whereupon there was a great tumult and consternation
on all sides. Claudius moved that the army at Capua be turned against
Caesar as a public enemy. When Curio opposed him on the ground that
the rumor was false he exclaimed, <q rend="double">If I am prevented by the vote of the
Senate from taking steps for the public safety, I will take such steps on my
own responsibility as consul.</q> After saying this he darted out of the Senate
and proceeded to the suburbs with his colleague, where he presented a sword
to Pompey, and said, <q rend="double">I and my colleague command you to march against
Caesar in behalf of your country, and we give you for this purpose
the army now at Capua, or in any other part of Italy, and whatever
additional forces you yourself choose to levy.</q> Pompey promised to obey the
orders of the consuls, but he added, <q rend="double">unless we can do better,</q> thus dealing
in trickery and still making a pretence of fairness. Curio had no power
outside of the city (for it was not permitted to the tribunes to go beyond
the walls), but he publicly deplored the state of affairs and demanded that
the consuls should make proclamation that nobody need obey the conscription
ordered by Pompey. As he could accomplish nothing, and as his term of office
as tribune was about expiring, and he feared for his safety and despaired of
being able to render any further assistance to Caesar, he hastily
departed to join the latter. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER V</head>
<head>Caesar offers to lay down his Arms at the Same Time with
Pompey—The Senate declares Caesar a Public
Enemy—Caesar addresses his Soldiers—War openly declared —
Caesar crosses the Rubicon — Seizes Ariminum — Panic and
Prodigies in Italy—Pompey departs to the Army at Capua</head>

<div n="32" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Caesar had lately recrossed the straits from Britain and, after
traversing the Gallic country along the Rhine, had passed the Alps with 5000
foot and 300 horse and arrived at Ravenna, which was contiguous to Italy and
the last town in his government. After embracing Curio and returning thanks
for what he had done for him, he looked over the present situation. Curio
advised him to bring his whole army together now and lead it to Rome, but
Caesar thought it best still to try and come to terms. So he
directed his friends to make an agreement in his behalf, that he should
deliver up all his provinces and soldiers, except that he should retain two
legions and Illyria with Cisalpine Gaul until he should be chosen consul.
This was satisfactory to Pompey, but the consuls refused. Caesar
then wrote a letter to the Senate, which Curio carried a distance of 1300 stades<note resp="translator">About 150 English miles. The Vatican codex says 1300 stades; all the others say 3300 (378
miles), which is quite incredible.</note> in three days and delivered to
the newly elected consuls as they entered the senate-house on the first
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 705</note> of the
calends of January.<note resp="translator">Literally: 
 <q rend="double">On the day of the new moon of the year.</q></note> The letter embraced a
calm <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0049">49</date></note> recital of all that Caesar had done from
the beginning of his career and a proposal that he would lay down his
command at the same time with Pompey, but that if Pompey should retain his
command he would not lay down his own, but would come quickly and avenge his
country’s wrongs and his own. When this letter was read, as it was
considered a declaration of war, a vehement shout was raised on all sides
that Lucius Domitius be appointed as Caesar’s successor. Domitius
took the field immediately with 4000 of the new levies. </p>
</div><div n="33" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Since Antony and Cassius, who succeeded Curio as tribunes, agreed with the
latter in opinion, the Senate became more bitter than ever and declared
Pompey’s army the protector of Rome, and that of Caesar a public
enemy. The consuls, Marcellus and Lentulus, ordered Antony and his friends
out of the Senate lest they should suffer some harm, although they were
tribunes. Then Antony sprang from his chair in anger and with a loud voice
called gods and men to witness the indignity put upon the sacred and
inviolable office of tribune, saying that while they (the tribunes) were
expressing the opinion which they deemed conducive to the public interest,
they were driven out with contumely though they had wrought no murder or
other outrage. Having spoken thus he rushed out like one possessed,
predicting war, slaughter, proscription, banishment, confiscation, and
various other impending evils, and invoking direful curses on the authors of
them. Curio and Cassius rushed out with him, for a detachment of Pompey’s
army was already observed standing around the senate-house. The tribunes
made their way to Caesar the next night with the utmost speed,
concealing themselves in a hired carriage, and disguised as slaves.
Caesar showed them in this condition to his army, whom he excited
by saying that his soldiers, after all their great deeds, had been
stigmatized as public enemies and that distinguished men like these, who had
dared to speak out for them, had been thus driven with ignominy from the
city.<note resp="translator">This speech is reported
by Caesar himself at considerable length in his
<title>Commentaries on the Civil War</title> (i. 7). It was made to
the thirteenth legion, the only one present. The soldiers cried out that
they were ready to defend their general and the tribunes from all
harm.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="34" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The war had now been begun on both sides and already openly declared. The
Senate, thinking that Caesar’s army would be slow in arriving from
Gaul and that he would not rush into so great an adventure with a small
force, directed Pompey to assemble 130,000 Italian soldiers, chiefly
veterans who had had experience in war, and to recruit as many able-bodied
men as possible from the neighboring provinces. They voted him for the war
all the money in the public treasury at once, and their own private fortunes
in addition if they should be needed for the pay of the soldiers. With the
fury of party rage they levied additional contributions on the allied
cities, which they collected with the greatest possible haste.
Caesar had sent messengers to bring his own army, but as he was
accustomed to rely upon the terror caused by the celerity and audacity of
his movements, rather than on the magnitude of his preparations, he decided
to take the aggressive in this great war with his 5000 men and to anticipate
the enemy by seizing the advantageous positions in Italy. </p>
</div><div n="35" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Accordingly, he sent forward some centurions with a few of his bravest troops
in peaceful garb to go inside the walls of Ariminum and take it by surprise.
This was the first town in Italy after leaving Cisalpine Gaul. Toward
evening Caesar himself rose from a banquet on a plea of
indisposition, leaving some friends who were still feasting. He mounted his
chariot and drove toward Ariminum, his cavalry following at a short
distance. When his course brought him to the river Rubicon, which forms the
boundary line of Italy, he stopped and, while gazing at the stream, revolved
in his mind the evils that might result from his crossing it with arms.
Recovering himself he said to those who were present, <q rend="double">My friends, stopping
here will be the beginning of sorrows for me; crossing over will be such for
all mankind.</q> Thereupon, he crossed with a rush like one inspired, uttering
 the common phrase, <q rend="double">Let the die be cast.</q><note resp="translator"><q rend="double">The Rubicon,</q> says Duruy, <q rend="double">is probably the Fiumicino di
Savignano, a reddish torrent twelve miles north of Ariminum, formed by
the confluence of three brooks from the Apennines.</q> Duruy doubts the
whole story of Caesar’s hesitation at the Rubicon, but Plutarch
(<title>Life of Caesar,</title> 32) says that Asinius
Pollio was present; and there is reason to believe that both Plutarch
and Appian drew from Pollio’s history.</note> Then he resumed his hasty
journey and took possession of Ariminum about daybreak, advanced beyond it,
stationed guards at the commanding positions, and, either by force or by
kindness, mastered all whom he fell in with. As is usual in cases of panic,
there was flight and migration from all the country-side in disorder and
tears, the people having no exact knowledge, but thinking that
Caesar had arrived with an army of boundless strength. </p>
</div><div n="36" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the consuls learned the facts they did not allow Pompey to act according
to his own judgment, experienced as he was in military affairs, but urged
him to traverse Italy and raise troops, as though the city were on the point
of being captured. The Senate also was alarmed at Caesar’s
unexpectedly swift advance, for which it was still unprepared, and in its
panic repented that it had not accepted Caesar’s proposals, which
it considered just at last, after fear had turned it from party rage to the
counsels of prudence. Many portents and signs in the sky took place. It
rained blood. Sweat issued from the statues of the gods. Lightning struck
several temples. A mule gave birth to a colt.<note resp="translator">This was a favorite prodigy among the Romans. It was
observed when Sulla was advancing, after his war against Mithridates (i.
83 <emph>supra</emph>). Cicero alludes to the subject in his
treatise on Divination (ii. 22).</note> There were many other prodigies
which betokened an overturn and change in the form of government for all
time. Prayers were offered up in public as was customary in times of danger,
and the people who remembered the evil times of Marius and Sulla, clamored
that both Caesar and Pompey ought to lay down their commands as the
only means of averting war. Cicero proposed to send messengers to
Caesar in order to come to an arrangement.<note resp="translator">Plutarch (<title>Life of Pompey,</title> 59) says
that Cicero, who had lately returned from Cilicia, labored to bring
about a reconciliation, proposing that Caesar should leave his
province of Gaul and disband his army, reserving two legions only,
together with the government of Illyricum, and be nominated for a second
consulship. Caesar’s friends afterward reduced his claims to
one legion, but even that was rejected.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="37" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As the consuls opposed all accommodation Favonius, in ridicule of Pompey for
something he had said a little before, advised him to stamp on the ground
with his foot and raise armies in that way. <q rend="double">You can have them,</q> replied
Pompey, <q rend="double">if you will follow me and not consider it such a terrible thing to
leave Rome, and Italy also if need be. Places and houses are not strength
and freedom to men; but men, wherever they may be, have these qualities
within themselves, and by defending themselves shall recover their homes.</q> 
After saying this and after threatening those who should remain behind and
desert their country’s cause in order to save their fields and their goods,
he left the Senate and the city immediately to take command of the army at
Capua, and the consuls followed him. The other senators remained undecided a
long time and passed the night together in the senate-house. At daybreak,
however, most of them departed and hastened after Pompey.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VI</head>
<head>Caesar captures Corfinium and L. Domitius—The Consuls cross
over to Dyrrachium — Pompey escapes from Caesar at Brundusium
— Caesar takes the Money from the Public
Treasury—Caesar marches to Spain—Captures the Pompeian Forces
there</head>
<div n="38" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>At Corfinium Caesar came up with and besieged Lucius Domitius, who
had been sent to be his successor in the command of Gaul but who did not
have all of his 4000 men with him. The inhabitants of Corfinium captured him
at the gates, as he was trying to escape, and brought him to
Caesar.<note resp="translator"><q rend="double">If we may
believe Lucan,</q> says Combes-Dounous, <q rend="double">the soldiers of Domitius
themselves delivered him to Caesar:</q> <cit>
<quote>Ecce nefas belli, reseratis agmina portis Captivum traxere
ducem.</quote>
<bibl>(<title>Pharsalia,</title> ii. 506.)</bibl>
</cit> There is better authority for this statement than Lucan.
Caesar affirms it in his detailed account of the military
operations around Corfinium. (<title>Civil War,</title> i. 23.)</note>
The latter received the soldiers of Domitius, who offered themselves to him,
with kindness, in order to encourage others to join him, and he allowed
Domitius to go unharmed wherever he liked, and to take his money with
him.<note resp="translator">Caesar says
that he allowed Domitius to take this money although he knew that it had
been given to him by Pompey for the pay of his troops.
(<title>Ibid.</title>)</note> He hoped perhaps that Domitius would
stay with him on account of this beneficence, but he did not prevent him
from joining Pompey. While these transactions were taking place so swiftly,
Pompey hastened from Capua to Luceria and thence to Brundusium in order to
cross the Adriatic to Epirus and complete his preparations for war there. He
wrote letters to all the provinces and the commanders thereof, to princes,
kings, and cities to send aid for carrying on the war with the greatest
possible speed, and this they did zealously. Pompey’s own army was in Spain
ready to move wherever it might be needed. Pompey gave some of the legions
he already had in Italy to the consuls to be moved from Brundusium to
Epirus. </p>
</div><div n="39" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The consuls crossed safely to Dyrrachium,<note resp="translator">The modern Durazzo.</note> which some persons, by reason of
the following error, consider the same as Epidamnus. A barbarian king of the
region, Epidamnus by name, built a city on the sea-coast and named it after
himself. Dyrrachus, the son of his daughter and of Neptune (as is supposed),
added a dockyard to it which he named Dyrrachium. When the brothers of this
Dyrrachus made war against him, Hercules, who was returning from Erythea,
formed an alliance with him for a part of his territory; wherefore the
Dyrrachians claim Hercules as their founder because he had a share of their
land, not that they repudiate Dyrrachus, but because they pride themselves
on Hercules even more as a god. In the battle which took place it is said
that Hercules killed Ionius, the son of Dyrrachus, by mistake, and that
after performing the funeral rites he threw the body into the sea in order
that it might bear his name.<note resp="translator">The
Ionian sea of the Greeks was the southern part of the Adriatic lying
between Greece and Italy. Strabo (v. I, 8) says that the Adriatic took
its name from the town of Atria in Venetia. In another place (vii. 5,
10), he says: <q rend="double">The Ionian and the Adriatic have a common mouth, but
there is this difference, that the first part of this sea was called the
Ionian, and the interior portion, as far as the northern extremity, the
Adriatic, but now the whole is called by the latter name. Theopompus
says that the former of these names was derived from a man who ruled
this region and was a native of Issa, and that the latter was derived
from the river Adria.</q> This river is the modern Tartaro.</note> At a
later period the Briges, returning from Phrygia, took possession of the city
and the surrounding country. They were supplanted by the Taulantii, an
Illyrian tribe, who were displaced in their turn by the Liburnians, another
Illyrian tribe, who were in the habit of making piratical expeditions
against their neighbors, with very swift ships. Hence the Romans call swift
ships <foreign xml:lang="lat">liburnicae,</foreign> because these were the first
ones they came in conflict with. The people who had been expelled from
Dyrrachium by the Liburnians procured the aid of the Corcyreans, who then
ruled the sea, and drove out the Liburnians. The Corcyreans mingled their
own colonists with them and thus it came to be considered a Greek port; but
the Corcyreans changed its name, because they considered it unpropitious,
and called it Epidamnus from the town just above it, and Thucydides gives it
that name also. Nevertheless, the former name prevailed finally and it is
now called Dyrrachium. </p>
</div><div n="40" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>A portion of Pompey’s forces had crossed to Dyrrachium with the consuls.
Pompey led the remainder to Brundusium, where he awaited the return of the
ships that had carried the others over. Here Caesar advanced
against him, and he defended himself by walls and dug trenches in the
city<note resp="translator">Caesar says
that <q rend="double">Pompey, either alarmed at Caesar’s works, or because he
had decided from the beginning to leave Italy, began to prepare for his
departure as soon as his ships should return, and in order the more
effectually to delay Caesar’s onset, lest the soldiers should
break in while he was on the point of embarking, he blocked up the
gates, built walls in the streets and avenues, dug ditches across the
ways and drove sharpened stakes and branches of trees in them.</q>
(<title>Civil War,</title> i. 27.)</note> until his fleet came back.
Then he took his departure in the early evening, leaving the bravest of his
troops on the walls. These also sailed away after nightfall, with a
favorable wind. Thus Pompey and his whole army abandoned Italy and passed
over to Epirus. Caesar, seeing the general drift of public opinion
toward Pompey, was at a loss which way to turn or from what point to begin
the war. As he had apprehensions of Pompey’s army in Spain, which was large
and well disciplined by long service (lest while he was pursuing Pompey it
should fall upon his rear), he decided to march to Spain and destroy that
army first. He now divided his forces into five parts, one of which he left
at Brundusium, another at Hydrus,<note resp="translator">The modern Otranto.</note> and another at Tarentum to guard Italy.
Another he sent under command of Quintus Valerius to take possession of the
grain-producing island of Sardinia, which he did. He sent Asinius Pollio to
Sicily, which was then under the command of Cato. When Cato asked him
whether he had brought the order of the Senate, or that of the people, to
take possession of a government that had been assigned to another, Pollio
replied, <q rend="double">The master of Italy has sent me on this business.</q> Cato answered
that in order to spare the lives of those under his command he would not
make resistance there. He then sailed away to Corcyra and from Corcyra to
Pompey.<note resp="translator">Asinius Pollio wrote
a history of the civil wars from the year 60 to the battle of Philippi,
which is lost. It is the subject of eulogy in one of the Odes of Horace
(Lib. ii. Carm. I). Mendelssohn and G. Thouret are of the opinion that
both Appian and Plutarch drew from some Greek author who drew from
Pollio. Appian refers to Pollio’s history in Sec. 82
<emph>infra.</emph></note>
</p>
</div><div n="41" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Caesar hastened to Rome. He found the people shuddering with
recollection of the horrors of Marius and Sulla and he cheered them with the
prospect and promise of clemency. In proof of his kindness to his enemies,
he said that he had taken Lucius Domitius prisoner and allowed him to go
away unharmed with his money. Nevertheless, he broke the bolts of the public
treasury, and when Metellus, one of the tribunes, tried to prevent him from
entering, threatened him with death. He took away money hitherto untouched,
which, they say, had been deposited there long ago, at the time of the
Gallic invasion, with a public curse upon anybody who should take it out
except in case of a war with the Gauls. Caesar said that he had
subjugated the Gauls completely and thus released the commonwealth from the
curse. He then placed Aemilius Lepidus in charge of the city, and
the tribune, Mark Antony, in charge of Italy and of the army guarding it.
Outside of Italy he chose Curio to take command of Sicily in place of
Cato,<note resp="translator">The preceding section
says that Asinius Pollio was sent to take command of Sicily.
Caesar himself says (i. 30) that he sent Curio to Sicily with
three legions and ordered him, when he had recovered that island, to
transport his army immediately to Africa. He adds that Cato was
energetically preparing for war by land and sea, but that when he was
advised of Curio’s approach he fled from his province.</note> and
Quintus Valerius for Sardinia. He sent Gaius Antonius to Illyria and
intrusted Cisalpine Gaul to Licinius Crassus. He ordered the building of two
fleets with all speed, one in the Adriatic and the other in the Tyrrhenian
sea, and appointed Hortensius and Dolabella their admirals while they were
still under construction. </p>
</div><div n="42" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Having prevailed so far as to make Italy inaccessible to Pompey,
Caesar went to Spain, where he encountered Petreius and Afranius,
Pompey’s lieutenants, and was worsted by them at first and afterward had an
indecisive engagement with them near the town of Ilerda.<note resp="translator">The modern Lerida.</note> He pitched his camp on
some high ground and obtained his supplies by means of a bridge across the
river Sicoris.<note resp="translator">The modern
Segre.</note> Suddenly a freshet of melting snow carried away his bridge
and cut off a great number of his men on the opposite side. These were
destroyed by the forces of Petreius. Caesar himself, with the rest
of his army, suffered very severely from the difficulty of the place, from
hunger, from the weather, and from the enemy, his situation being in no wise
different from that of a siege. Finally, on the approach of summer, Afranius
and Petreius withdrew to the interior of Spain to recruit more soldiers, but
Caesar continually anticipated them, blocked their passage, and
prevented their advance. He also surrounded one of their divisions that had
been sent forward to capture his camp. They raised their shields over their
heads in token of surrender, but Caesar neither captured nor
slaughtered them, but allowed them to go back to Afranius unharmed, after
his usual manner of winning the favor of his enemies. Whence it came to pass
that there was continual intercourse between the camps and talk of
reconciliation among the rank and file. </p>
</div><div n="43" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>To Afranius and some of the other officers it now seemed best to abandon
Spain to Caesar, provided they could go unharmed to Pompey.
Petreius opposed this and ran through the camp killing those of
Caesar’s men whom he found holding communication with his own. He
even slew with his own hand one of his officers who tried to restrain him.
Moved by these acts of severity on the part of Petreius, the minds of the
soldiers were still more attracted to the clemency of Caesar. Soon
afterward Caesar managed to cut off the enemy’s access to water,
and Petreius was compelled by necessity to come with Afranius to a
conference with Caesar between the two armies. Here it was agreed
that they should abandon Spain to Caesar, and that he should
conduct them unharmed to the other side of the river Varus<note resp="translator">The modern Var. It rises in the
Maritime Alps and empties into the Mediterranean near Nice.</note> and
allow them to proceed thence to Pompey. Arrived at this stream,
Caesar called a meeting of all those who were from Rome or Italy
and addressed them as follows: <q rend="double">My enemies (for by still using this term I
shall make my meaning clearer to you), I did not destroy those of you who
surrendered to me when you had been sent to seize my camp, nor the rest of
your army when I had cut you off from water, although Petreius had
previously slaughtered those of my men who were intercepted on the other
side of the river Sicoris. If there is any gratitude among you for these
favors tell them to all of Pompey’s soldiers.</q> After speaking thus he
dismissed them uninjured, and he appointed Quintus Cassius governor of
Spain. So much for the operations of Caesar.<note resp="translator">This is a very meagre account of the Ilerda
campaign. That of Plutarch is still more so. A detailed narrative of it
is given by Caesar himself (i. 37-87), showing how he
manœuvred the enemy into a surrender without coming to a
general engagement.</note></p>
</div></div>
 <div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VII</head>
<head>Campaign of Curio in Africa — He is defeated and killed — Mutiny in
Caesar’s Army at Placentia — Caesar chosen
Dictator</head>
<div n="44" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Attius Varus commanded the Pompeian forces in Africa, and Juba, king of the
Mauritanian Numidians, was in alliance with him. Curio sailed from Sicily
against them in behalf of Caesar with two legions, twelve war
vessels, and a number of ships of burden. He landed at Utica and put to
flight a body of Numidian horse in a small cavalry engagement near that
place, and allowed himself to be saluted as Imperator by the soldiers with
their arms still in their hands. This title is an honor conferred upon
generals by their soldiers, who thus testify that they consider them worthy
to be their commanders. In the olden time the generals accepted this honor
only for the greatest exploits. At present I understand that the distinction
is limited to cases where at least 10,000 of the enemy have been killed.
While Curio was crossing from Sicily the inhabitants of Africa thinking
that, in emulation of the glory of Scipio, he would establish his quarters
near the camp of the latter, poisoned the water in the neighborhood. Their
expectation was fulfilled. Curio encamped there and his army immediately
fell sick. When they drank the water their eyesight became dim as in a mist,
and sleep with torpor ensued, and after that frequent vomiting and spasms of
the whole body. For this reason Curio changed his camp to the neighborhood
of Utica itself, leading his enfeebled army through an extensive marshy
region. But when they received the news of Caesar’s victory in
Spain they took courage and put themselves in order of battle in a narrow
space along the seashore. Here a severe battle was fought in which Curio
lost only one man, while Varus lost 600 killed, besides a still larger
number wounded.<note resp="translator">This story, with
its incredible disproportion of loss, is related also by Caesar
(ii. 35), who tells us that Varus had the advantage of position.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="45" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Meantime, while Juba was advancing a false report preceded him, that he had
turned back at the river Bagradas, which was not far distant, because his
kingdom had been invaded by his neighbors, and that he had left Saburra, his
general, with a small force at the river. Curio believed this report and
about the third hour of a hot summer day led the greater part of his army
against Saburra by a sandy road destitute of water; for even if there were
any streams there in winter they were now dried up by the heat of the sun.
He found the river in possession of Saburra and of the king himself.
Disappointed in his expectation Curio retreated to some hills, oppressed by
fatigue, heat, and thirst. When the enemy beheld him in this condition they
crossed the river prepared for fight. Curio despised the danger and very
imprudently led his enfeebled army down to the plain, where he was
surrounded by the Numidian horse. Here for some time he sustained the attack
by retiring slowly and drawing his men together into a small space, but
being much distressed he retreated again to the hills. Asinius Pollio, at
the beginning of the trouble, had retreated with a small force to the camp
at Utica lest Varus should make an attack upon it as soon as he should hear
the news of the disaster at the river. Curio perished fighting bravely,
together with all his men, not one returning to Utica after Pollio. Such was
the result of the battle at the river Bagradas. Curio’s head was cut off and
carried to Juba. </p>
</div><div n="46" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As soon as the news of this disaster reached the camp at Utica, Flamma, the
admiral, fled, fleet and all, not taking a single one of the land forces on
board, but Pollio rowed out in a small boat to the merchant ships that were
lying at anchor near by and besought them to come to the shore and take the
army on board. Some of them did so by night. The soldiers came aboard in
such crowds that some of the small boats were sunk. Of those who were
carried out to sea, and who had money with them, many were thrown overboard
by the merchants for the sake of the money. So much for those who put to
sea, but similar calamities, while it was still night, befell those who
remained on shore. At daybreak they surrendered themselves to Varus, but
Juba came up and, having collected them under the walls, put them all to the
sword, claiming that they were the remainder of his victory, and paying no
attention to the remonstrances of even Varus. Thus the two Roman legions
that sailed to Africa with Curio were totally destroyed, together with the
cavalry, the light-armed troops, and the servants belonging to the army.
Juba, after vaunting his great exploit to Pompey, returned home. </p>
</div><div n="47" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>About this time [Gaius] Antonius was defeated in Illyria by Pompey’s
lieutenant, Octavius, and another army of Caesar mutinied at
Placentia, crying out against their officers for prolonging the war and not
paying them the five minae<note resp="translator">The silver mina was equal to about $18 of our money.</note>
that Caesar had promised them as a donative while they were still
at Brundusium. When Caesar heard of this he flew from Massilia to
Placentia and coming before the soldiers, who were still in a state of
mutiny, addressed them as follows: <q rend="double">You know what kind of speed I use in
everything I undertake. This war is not prolonged by us, but by the enemy,
who have fled from us. You reaped great advantages from my command in Gaul,
and you took an oath to me for the whole of this war and not for a part
only; and now you abandon us in the midst of our labors, you revolt against
your officers, you propose to give orders to those from whom you are bound
to receive orders. Being myself the witness of my liberality to you
heretofore I shall now execute the law of our country<note resp="translator"><q rend="double">The Greek text in several old MSS. at this place
reads <foreign xml:lang="grc">Πετρηίῳ νόμῳ</foreign> which supposes a
Petreian law totally unknown in Roman history. Casaubon was the first to
perceive that it ought to read <foreign xml:lang="grc">πατρίῳ νόμῳ</foreign> instead of <foreign xml:lang="grc">πετρηίῳ.</foreign> Tollius sustained the correction of Casaubon and the MS. of the library of Augsburg and that of Venice, verified by Schweighäuser, have confirmed it.</q> (<title>Combes-Dounous.</title>) The phrase occurs again in Sec. 63 <emph>infra.</emph></note> by decimating the ninth legion, where this mutiny began.</q> Straightway a cry went up from the whole legion, and the officers threw themselves at Caesar’s feet in supplication.
Caesar yielded little by little and so far remitted the punishment
as to designate 120 only (who seemed to have been the leaders of the
revolt), and chose twelve of these by lot to be put to death. One of the
twelve proved that he was absent when the conspiracy was formed, and
Caesar put to death in his stead the centurion who had accused him. </p>
</div><div n="48" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After thus quelling the mutiny at Placentia Caesar proceeded to
Rome, where the trembling people chose him dictator without any decree of
the Senate and without the intervention of a magistrate. But he, either
deprecating the office as likely to prove invidious or not desiring it,
after holding it only eleven days (as some say) designated himself and
Publius Isauricus as consuls.<note resp="translator">Caesar says that while he was at Massilia he learned that a
law had been passed for creating a dictator and that he had been named
for that office by Marcus Lepidus, the praetor.</note> He
appointed or changed the governors of provinces according to his own
pleasure. He assigned Marcus Lepidus to Spain, Aulus Albinius to Sicily,
Sextus Peducaeus to Sardinia, and Decimus Brutus to the newly
acquired Gaul. He distributed corn to the suffering people and at their
petition he allowed the return of all exiles except Milo. When he was asked
to decree an abolition of debts, on the ground that the wars and seditions
had caused a fall of prices, he refused it, but appointed appraisers of
vendible goods which debtors might give to their creditors instead of
money.<note resp="translator">Caesar’s
account of this matter is as follows: <q rend="double">Since credit was at a low ebb in
the whole of Italy and debts could not be paid in money, Caesar
decided that arbiters should be appointed to appraise the property and
possessions of the debtors at their value before the war and hand them
over to the creditors.</q> (<title>Civil War,</title> iii. I.)</note> When
this had been done, about the winter solstice, he sent for his whole army to
rendezvous at Brundusium and he himself took his departure in the month of
December, according to the Roman calendar, not waiting for the beginning of
his consulship on the calends of the new year, which was close at hand. The
people followed him to the city gates, urging him to come to an arrangement
with Pompey, for it was evident that whichever of them should conquer would
wield sovereign power. Caesar departed on his journey and travelled
with all possible speed.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="8" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VIII</head>
<head>Pompey’s Forces — Pompey’s Speech to his Army — Caesar at
Brundusium — He addresses his Soldiers — Caesar sails for
Epirus — Captures Oricum and Apollonia — Marches toward
Dyrrachium—Encamps before it</head>
<div n="49" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In the meantime Pompey was using all diligence to build ships and collect
additional forces of men and money. He captured forty of Caesar’s
ships in the Adriatic and guarded against his crossing. He disciplined his
army and took part in the exercises of both infantry and cavalry, and was
foremost in everything, notwithstanding his age. In this way he readily
gained the good-will of his soldiers; and the people flocked to see Pompey’s
military drills as to a spectacle. Caesar at that time had ten
legions of infantry and 10,000 Gallic horse. Pompey had five legions from
Italy, with which he had crossed the Adriatic, and the cavalry belonging to
them; also the two surviving legions that had served with Crassus in the
Parthian war and a certain part of those who had made the incursion into
Egypt with Gabinius, making altogether eleven legions of Italian troops and
about 7000 horse. He had auxiliaries also from Ionia, Macedonia,
Peloponnesus, and Bœotia, Cretan archers, Thracian slingers, and
Pontic javelin-throwers. He had also some Gallic horse and others from
Galatia in the east, together with Commageneans sent by Antiochus,
Cilicians, Cappadocians, some from Lesser Armenia, also Pamphylians and
Pisidians. Pompey did not intend to use all these for fighting. Some were
employed in garrison duty, in building fortifications, and in other service
for the Italian soldiers, so that none of the latter should be kept away
from the battles. Such were Pompey’s land forces. He had 600 war-ships
perfectly equipped, of which about 100 were manned by Romans and were
understood to be much superior to the rest. He also had a great number of
transports and ships of burthen. There were numerous naval commanders for
the different divisions, and Marcus Bibulus had the chief command over all. </p>
</div><div n="50" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When all was in readiness Pompey called the senators, the knights, and the
whole army to an assembly and addressed them as follows: <q rend="double">Fellow-soldiers,
the Athenians, too, abandoned their city for the sake of liberty when they
were fighting against invasion, because they believed that it was not houses
that made a city, but men; and after they had done so they presently
recovered it and made it more renowned than even before. So, too, our own
ancestors abandoned the city when the Gauls invaded it, and Camillus hasted
from Ardea and recovered it. All men of sound mind think that their country
is wherever they can preserve their liberty. Because we were thus minded we
sailed hither, not as deserters of our native land, but in order to prepare
ourselves to defend it gloriously against one who has long conspired against
it, and, by means of bribe-takers, has at last seized Italy by a sudden
invasion, and whom you have decreed a public enemy. He now sends governors
to take charge of your provinces. He appoints others over the city and still
others throughout Italy. With such audacity has he deprived the people of
their own government. If he does these things while the war is still raging
and while he is apprehensive of the result and when we intend, with a god’s
help, to bring him to punishment, what cruelty, what violence is he likely
to abstain from if he wins the victory? And while he is doing these things
against the fatherland certain men, who have been bought with money that he
obtained from our province of Gaul, coöperate with him, choosing to
be his slaves instead of his equals.</q> </p>
</div><div n="51" type="textpart" subtype="section">
 <p><q rend="double; merge">I have not failed and I never will fail to fight with you and for you. I
give you my services both as soldier and as general. If I have had any
experience in war, if it has been my good fortune to remain unvanquished to
this day, I pray the gods to continue all these blessings in our present
need and that I may become a man of destiny for my country in her perils as
I was in extending her dominion. Surely we may trust in the gods and in the
righteousness of the war, which has for its noble and just object the
defence of our country’s constitution. In addition to this we may rely upon
the magnitude of the preparations which we behold on land and sea, which are
all the time growing and will be augmented still more as soon as we come
into action. We may say that all the nations of the East and around the
Euxine Sea, both Greek and barbarian, stand with us, and the kings, who are
friends of the Roman people or of myself, are supplying us soldiers, arms,
provisions, and other implements of war. Come to your task then with a
spirit worthy of your country, of yourselves, and of me, mindful of the
wrongs you have received from Caesar, and ready to obey my orders
promptly.</q> </p>
</div><div n="52" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Pompey had thus spoken the whole army, including the senators and a
great many of the nobility who were with him, applauded him vociferously and
told him to lead them wherever he would. Pompey thought that as the weather
was bad and the sea boisterous Caesar would not attempt to cross
till the end of winter, but would be occupied in the meantime with his
duties as consul. So he ordered his naval officers to keep watch of the sea,
and then divided his army and sent it into winter quarters in Thessaly and
Macedonia. So heedlessly did Pompey form his judgment of what was about to
take place. Caesar, as I have already said, hastened to Brundusium
about the winter solstice, intending to strike terror into his enemies by
taking them by surprise. Although he found neither provisions, nor
apparatus, nor his whole army collected at Brundusium, he, nevertheless,
called those who were present to an assembly and addressed them as
follows:— </p>
</div><div n="53" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double">Fellow-soldiers,—you who are joined with me in the greatest of
undertakings,—neither the winter weather, nor the delay of our comrades,
nor the want of suitable preparation shall check my onset. I consider
rapidity of movement the best substitute for all these things. I think that
we who are first at the rendezvous should leave behind us here our servants,
our pack-animals, and all our apparatus in order that the ships which are
here may take us on board and carry us over at once without the enemy’s
knowledge. Let us oppose our good fortune to the winter weather, our courage
to the smallness of our numbers, and to our want of supplies the abundance
of the enemy, which will be ours to take as soon as we touch the land, if we
realize that nothing is ours unless we conquer. Let us go then and possess
ourselves of their servants, their apparatus, their provisions, while they
are spending the winter under cover. Let us go while Pompey thinks that I am
spending my time in winter quarters also, or in processions and sacrifices
appertaining to my consulship. It is needless to tell you that the most
potent thing in war is the unexpected. It will be glorious for us to carry
off the first honors of the coming conflict and to prepare a safe pathway
yonder for those who will immediately follow us. For my part I would rather
now be sailing than talking, so that I may come in Pompey’s sight while he
thinks me engaged in my official duties at Rome. Although I am certain that
you agree with me I await your response.</q><note resp="translator">Caesar’s account of his own speech is much
briefer, viz: <q rend="double">When Caesar arrived at Brundusium he addressed
his soldiers saying that since they were almost at the end of their
labors and perils they should be content to leave their slaves and
impedimenta in Italy and embark themselves in the ships in light order so that a greater number of troops could be transported, and that they might expect everything from victory and his liberality.</q> (iii. 6.)</note> </p>
</div><div n="54" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The whole army cried out with enthusiasm that he should lead on.
Caesar at once led, from the platform to the seashore, five legions
of foot-soldiers and 600 chosen horse, but as a storm came up he was obliged
to cast anchor. It was now the winter solstice and the wind kept him back,
against his will, and held him in Brundusium, to his great disappointment,
until the first day of the new <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 706</note> year.<note resp="translator">Caesar says that he sailed on the fourth day of
January.</note> In the meantime two more legions arrived and <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0048">48</date></note> Caesar embarked these also and started in the
winter time on merchant ships, for he had only a few war-ships and these
were guarding Sardinia and Sicily. The ships were driven by the winds to the
Ceraunian Mountains and Caesar sent them back immediately to bring
the rest of the army.<note resp="translator">Caesar tells of another effort which he made for peace by
sending Vibullius Rufus to Pompey with a proposal that both should
disband their armies within three days. Pompey refused to discuss the
proposal, saying: <q rend="double">Of what use to me is life or citizenship if I shall
seem to owe them to the benefaction of Caesar, a belief which
will never be erased if it is supposed that I am thus brought back to
Italy from which I departed.</q> (iii. 10-18.)</note> He then marched by
night against the town of Oricum by a rough and narrow path, with his force
divided in several parts on account of the difficulties of the road, so that
if his army had been anticipated he might have been easily beaten. With much
trouble he got his detachments together about daylight and the commander of
the garrison of Oricum, having been forbidden by the townsmen to oppose the
entrance of a Roman consul, delivered the keys of the place to
Caesar and remained with him in a position of honor. Lucretius and
Minucius, who were on the other side of Oricum with eighteen war-ships
guarding merchant ships loaded with corn for Pompey, sunk the latter to
prevent them from falling into Caesar’s hands, and fled to
Dyrrachium. From Oricum Caesar hastened to Apollonia,<note resp="translator">The modern Pollina. It was
situated on the southern border of Illyria. The Egnatian Way, the Roman
military road to Macedonia and the East, ran from Apollonia and
Dyrrachium to Thessalonica. (Strabo, vii. 7, 4.)</note> the inhabitants
of which received him. Straberius, the commander of the garrison, abandoned
the city. </p>
</div><div n="55" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Caesar assembled his army and congratulated them on the success they
had achieved by their rapid movement in mid-winter, on conquering such a sea
without war-ships, on taking Oricum and Apollonia without a fight, and on
capturing the enemy’s supplies, as he had predicted, without Pompey’s
knowledge. <q rend="double">If we can anticipate him in reaching Dyrrachium, his military
arsenal,</q> he added, <q rend="double">we shall be in possession of all the things they have
collected by the labors of a whole summer.</q> After speaking thus he led his
soldiers directly toward Dyrrachium over a long road, not stopping day or
night. Pompey, being advised beforehand, marched toward the same place from
Macedonia<note resp="translator">Caesar
says that Pompey was at Candavia. This was the name of a mountain range
also. It was situated on the Egnatian Way in Illyria and was nearer to
Dyrrachium than Apollonia was. Caesar’s course took him
northwardly to a junction with the main road about midway between
Candavia and Dyrrachium. Pompey going westward passed this junction
first and had Caesar in his rear.</note> with extreme haste
also, cutting down trees along the road, in order to obstruct
Caesar’s passage, destroying bridges, and setting fire to all the
supplies he met with, considering it of the greatest importance (as it was)
to defend his own arsenal. If either of them saw any dust, or fire, or smoke
at a distance they thought it was caused by the other, and they strove like
athletes in a race. They did not allow themselves time for food or sleep.
All was haste and eagerness mingled with the shouts of guides who carried
torches, causing tumult and fear as when hostile armies are ever drawing
nearer and nearer to each other. Some of the soldiers from fatigue threw
away their loads. Others hid themselves in ravines and were left behind,
exchanging their fear of the enemy for a moment’s rest. </p>
</div><div n="56" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In the midst of such vicissitudes on either side Pompey arrived first at
Dyrrachium and encamped near it. He sent a fleet and retook Oricum and kept
the strictest watch on the sea. Caesar pitched his camp so that the
river Alor<note resp="translator">Caesar and
all other authorities say the river Apsus.</note> ran between himself
and Pompey. By crossing the stream they had occasional cavalry skirmishes
with each other. The armies did not come to a general engagement, however,
for Pompey was still exercising his new levies and Caesar waited
for the forces left at Brundusium. The latter apprehended that if these
should sail in merchant ships in the spring they would not escape Pompey’s
triremes, which would be patrolling the sea, as guard ships, in great
numbers, but if they should cross in winter while the enemy were lying
inside among the islands they might perhaps be unnoticed, or might force
their way by the strength of the wind and the size of their ships. So he
sent orders to them to hasten. As they did not come he decided to cross over
secretly to that army, because no one else could bring them so easily. He
concealed his intention and sent three servants to the river, a distance of
twelve stades, to procure a fast-sailing vessel and a first rate pilot as
for a messenger sent by Caesar. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER IX</head>
<head>Caesar attempts to cross the Adriatic in a Small Boat—Sends for
Reënforcements—Antony arrives with the remainder of the Army
—Skirmishes at Dyrrachium — Caesar attempts to surround
Pompey —Battle of Dyrrachium — Caesar defeated</head>

<div n="57" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Then he rose from supper pretending to be fatigued and told his friends to
remain at the table. He put on the clothing of a private person, stepped
into a chariot, and drove away to the ship, pretending to be the one sent by
Caesar. He gave the rest of his orders through his servants and
remained concealed by the darkness of the night and unrecognized. As there
was a severe wind blowing the servants told the pilot to be of good courage
and seize this opportunity to avoid the enemy who were in the neighborhood.
The pilot made his way down the river by rowing. When they came toward the
mouth they found it broken into surf by the wind and the sea. The pilot at
the instigation of the servants put forth all his efforts, but as he could
make no progress he became fatigued and gave it up. Then Caesar
threw off his disguise and called out to him, <q rend="double">Brave the tempest with a
stout heart, you carry Caesar and Caesar’s fortunes.</q> Both
the rowers and the pilot were astounded and all took fresh courage and
gained the mouth of the river, but the wind and waves cast the ship high on
the bank. As the dawn was near and they feared lest the enemy should
discover them in the daylight, Caesar, after accusing his evil
genius for its invidiousness, allowed the ship to return, and it sailed up
the river with a strong wind.<note resp="translator">This incident is related by Plutarch, Florus, Valerius Maximus, and
Suetonius, but not by Caesar himself.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="58" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Some of Caesar’s friends were astonished at this act of bravery;
others blamed him, saying that it was a deed becoming a soldier but not a
general. As Caesar saw that he could not conceal a second attempt
he ordered Postumius to sail to Brundusium in his place and tell Gabinius to
cross over with the army immediately, and if he did not obey, to give the
same order to Antony, and if he failed then to give it to Calenus. Another
letter was written to the whole army in case all three should hesitate,
saying, <q rend="double">that every one who was willing to do so should follow Postumius on
shipboard and sail to any place where the wind might carry them, and not to
mind what happened to the ships, because Caesar did not want ships
but men.</q> Thus did Caesar put his trust in fortune rather than in
prudence.<note resp="translator">Caesar’s
account of this matter is as follows: <q rend="double">As these things made
Caesar anxious he wrote more imperatively to his forces at
Brundusium that they should not omit the opportunity of the first
favorable wind for sailing, and that they should direct their course
either to the shore of Apollonia, or to that of the Labeates, because
there they might beach their ships. These places were not frequented by
the enemy’s blockading fleet because they dared not venture very far
from their harbors.</q> (iii. 25.)</note> Pompey, in order to anticipate
Caesar’s reënforcements, made haste and led his army
forward prepared for battle. While two of his soldiers were searching in
midstream for the best place to cross the river, one of Caesar’s
men attacked and killed them both, whereupon Pompey drew back, as he
considered this event inauspicious. All of his friends blamed him for
missing this capital opportunity. </p>
</div><div n="59" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Postumius arrived at Brundusium Gabinius did not obey the order, but led
those who were willing to go with him by way of Illyria by forced marches.
Almost all of them were destroyed by the Illyrians and Caesar was
obliged to endure the outrage on account of his preoccupation. Antony
embarked the remainder of the army and sailed for Apollonia with a favorable
wind. About noon the wind failed and twenty of Pompey’s ships, that had put
out to search the sea, discovered and pursued them. There was great fear on
Caesar’s vessels lest in this calm the warships of the enemy should
ram them with their prows and sink them. They prepared themselves for battle
and began to discharge stones and darts, when suddenly the wind sprang up
stronger than before, filled their great sails unexpectedly, and enabled
them to complete their voyage without fear. The pursuers were left behind
and they suffered severely from the wind and waves in the narrow sea and
were scattered along a harborless and rocky coast. With difficulty they
captured two of Caesar’s ships that ran on a shoal. Antony brought
the remainder to the port of Nymphaeum.<note resp="translator">This adventure is described in similar terms but
at greater length by Caesar, who says that the pursuing ships,
sixteen in number, were driven upon the shore and wrecked, without a
single exception, and that their crews were either killed by being
dashed on the rocks or captured by his own men. The survivors, who were
Rhodians, were all sent home unharmed. The loss of two of Antony’s fleet
is described differently. These two became separated from the main body,
lost their way and came to anchor in front of Lissus three miles south
of Nymphaeum. Here they were attacked by another detachment of
Pompey’s naval force. One of them, containing 220 new recruits,
surrendered on the promise of safety, but they were all put to the sword
as soon as they reached land. The other containing 200 veterans was
beached and the occupants reached the shore where they defeated a
detachment of Pompey’s horse and made their way to Caesar.
(iii. 26-28.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="60" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Now Caesar had his whole army together and so had Pompey his. They
encamped opposite each other on hills in numerous redoubts. There were
frequent collisions around each of these redoubts while they were making
lines of circumvallation and trying to cut off each other’s supplies. In one
of these fights in front of a redoubt Caesar’s men were worsted,
and a centurion, of the name of Scaeva, while performing many deeds
of valor, was wounded in the eye with a dart. He advanced in front of his
men beckoning with his hand as though he wished to say something. When
silence was obtained he called out to one of Pompey’s centurions, who was
likewise distinguished for bravery, <q rend="double">Save one of your equals, save your
friend, send somebody to lead me by the hand, for I am wounded.</q> Two
soldiers advanced to him thinking that he was a deserter. One of these he
killed before the stratagem was discovered and he cut off the shoulder of
the other. This he did because he despaired of saving himself and his
redoubt. His men, moved by shame at this act of self-devotion, rushed
forward and saved the redoubt. Minucius, the commander of the post, also
suffered severely. It is said that he received 120 missiles on his shield,
was wounded six times, and, like Scaeva, lost an eye.<note resp="translator">Caesar says that it was
the shield of Scaeva that was pierced in 120 places and that
Caesar rewarded him with a large sum of money and promoted him
to be the first centurion instead of the eighth.</note> Caesar
honored them both with many military gifts. A certain man of Dyrrachium
having offered to betray the town to him, Caesar went by agreement
with a small force by night to the gates at the temple of Artemis.<note resp="translator">There is a lacuna in the text at
this place but it is filled by Dio Cassius (xli. 50), who relates the
same event thus: <q rend="double">Caesar, having attempted to corrupt the
defenders, advanced by night to Dyrrachium itself by a narrow passage
between a marsh and the sea, expecting that it would be betrayed. There
he was attacked by a large force in front and by another in the rear.
The latter were conveyed in ships and fell upon him unexpectedly. He
lost many of his men and narrowly escaped himself.</q></note> . . . The
same winter Pompey’s father-in-law (Scipio) advanced with another army from
Syria. Caesar’s general, Gaius Calvisius, had an engagement with
him in Macedonia, was beaten, and lost a whole legion except 800 men. </p>
</div><div n="61" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As Caesar could obtain no supplies by sea, on account of Pompey’s
naval superiority, his army began to suffer from hunger and was compelled to
make bread from herbs.<note resp="translator">Both
Plutarch and Caesar say roots. <q rend="double">Those who were away from the
fortifications,</q> says the latter, <q rend="double">found a kind of root which is called <q rend="single">chara,</q> which, mixed with milk, greatly relieved their want of food.
They fashioned it into the similitude of bread, and they had abundance
of it.</q> (iii. 48.)</note> When deserters brought loaves of this kind to
Pompey, thinking that he would be gladdened by the spectacle, he was not at
all pleased, but said, <q rend="double">What kind of wild beasts are we fighting with?</q> 
Then Caesar, compelled by necessity, drew his whole army together
in order to force Pompey to fight even against his will. The latter occupied
a number of the redoubts that Caesar had vacated and remained
quiet. Caesar was greatly vexed at this and ventured upon an
extremely difficult and chimerical task; that is, to carry a line of
circumvallation around the whole of Pompey’s positions from sea to sea,
thinking that even if he should fail he would acquire great renown from the
boldness of the enterprise.<note resp="translator">Caesar says that his reasons for this were threefold: to
prevent Pompey from interfering with his foragers, to prevent Pompey
himself from foraging, and to destroy his prestige by showing him to the
world besieged, and as one who dared not fight in the open. (iii.
43.)</note> The circuit was 1200 stades.<note resp="translator">The text here is probably corrupt.
The distance mentioned is equal to 133 miles. Caesar (iii. 63)
says that it was 17 miles; Florus (iv. 2) says 16 miles.</note> So,
great was the work that Caesar undertook. Pompey built a line of
countervallation. Thus they parried each other’s efforts. Nevertheless, they
fought one great battle in which Pompey defeated Caesar in the most
brilliant manner and pursued his men in headlong flight to his camp and took
many of his standards. The eagle (the standard held in highest honor by the
Romans) was saved with difficulty, the bearer having just time to throw it
over the palisade to those within. </p>
</div><div n="62" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While this remarkable defeat was in progress Caesar brought up other
troops from another quarter, but these also fell into a panic even when they
beheld Pompey still far distant. Although they were already close to the
gates they would neither make a stand, nor enter in good order, nor obey the
commands given to them, but all fled pell-mell without shame, without
orders, without reason. Caesar ran among them and with reproaches
showed them that Pompey was still far distant, yet under his very eye some
threw down their standards and fled, while others bent their gaze upon the
ground in shame and did nothing; so great consternation had befallen them.
One of the standard bearers, with his standard reversed, dared to thrust the
end of it at Caesar himself, but the attendants of the latter cut
him down. When the soldiers entered the camp they did not station any
guards. All precautions were neglected and the fortification was left
unprotected, so that it is probable that Pompey might then have captured it
and brought the war to an end by that one engagement had not Labienus,
misled by a god, persuaded him to pursue the fugitives instead. Moreover
Pompey himself hesitated, either because he suspected a stratagem when he
saw the gates unguarded or because he considered the war already decided by
this battle. So he turned against those outside of the camp and made a heavy
slaughter and took twenty-eight standards in the two engagements of this
day, but he here missed his second opportunity to give the finishing stroke
to the war. It is reported that Caesar said, <q rend="double">The war would have
been ended to-day in the enemy’s favor if they had had a commander who knew
how to make use of a victory.</q><note resp="translator">Caesar’s account of the battle of Dyrrachium and of the causes
of his defeat is embodied in Sections 59-71, Book iii. Two Allobrogian
cavalry officers deserted to Pompey because they had been detected
embezzling the pay of their own troops. They informed Pompey that a
section of Caesar’s line of circumvallation was still
unfinished. It was through this gap that Pompey made his sally at
daybreak, taking Caesar’s forces by surprise and throwing them
into a panic. The two engagements in one day, to which Appian refers,
were the fight which took place at this gap, and the subsequent one when
Caesar brought up reinforcements and made a counter attack
which ended disastrously by reason of one of those accidents common in
war. The ruin of Caesar’s army would have been complete, he
says, had not Pompey suspected an ambuscade and therefore desisted from
an attack on Caesar’s fortified camp. Caesar
acknowledges the loss of 32 military tribunes and centurions and 969
soldiers besides several Roman knights whom he names. Excellent diagrams
of these operations and of the fighting around Dyrrachium, as well as of
the battle of Pharsalus, are given in the military history of
Caesar by Col. Theodore Ayrault Dodge.</note></p>
</div></div>
 <div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER X</head>
<head>Caesar encourages his Men — Marches to Thessaly — Pompey
encamps at Pharsalus — Caesar short of Supplies — Pompey
prefers Delay but is overruled by his Council — Prodigies before the
Battle — The Armies at Pharsalus — Allies and Mercenaries</head>
<div n="63" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompey sent letters to all the kings and cities magnifying his victory, and
he expected that Caesar’s army would come over to him directly,
conceiving that it was oppressed by hunger and cast down by defeat, and
especially the officers because apprehensive of punishment for their bad
conduct in the battle. But the latter, as though some god had brought them
to repentance, were ashamed of their fault, and as Caesar chided
them gently and granted them pardon, they became still more angry with
themselves and by a surprising change demanded that they should be decimated
according to the law of their country. When Caesar did not agree to
this they were still more mortified, and acknowledged that he had been
shamefully treated by them. They cried out that he should at least put the
standard bearers to death because they themselves would never have run away
unless the standards had turned in flight first. Caesar would not
consent to this, but he reluctantly punished a few. So great was the zeal
excited among all by his moderation that they demanded to be led against the
enemy immediately. They urged him vehemently, beseeching and promising to
wipe out their disgrace by a splendid victory. Of their own accord they
visited each other in military order and took an oath by companies, under
the eye of Caesar himself, that they would not leave the field of
battle except as victors.<note resp="translator">This
agrees with the account given by Caesar himself of what took
place in his camp after his defeat at Dyrrachium. He made a speech to
his soldiers in which he dwelt on the great success they had achieved
prior to the last battle, and said that if all their efforts had not
been equally successful they must repair the defects of Fortune with
greater industry. <q rend="double">But whether their own panic,</q> he continued, <q rend="double">or some
mistake, or Fortune itself had snatched from them a victory already
gained and assured, the utmost effort should be made so that the
disaster incurred might be repaired by their bravery. If this were done
the loss they had suffered would redound to their advantage, as had been
the case at Gergovia (in Gaul), and those who had been timid in fighting
before would now go into battle fearlessly.</q> (iii. 73.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="64" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Wherefore Caesar’s friends urged him to avail himself of the army’s
repentance and eagerness promptly, but he said in the hearing of the host,
that he would take a better opportunity to lead them against the enemy, and
he exhorted them to be mindful of their present zeal. He privately
admonished his friends that it was necessary first for the soldiers to
recover from the very great alarm of their recent defeat, and for the enemy
to lose something of their present high confidence. He confessed also that
he had made a mistake in encamping before Dyrrachium where Pompey had
abundance of supplies, whereas he ought to have drawn him to some place
where he would be subject to the same scarcity as themselves. After saying
this he marched directly to Apollonia and from there to Thessaly, advancing
by night in order to conceal his movements. The small town of Gomphi<note resp="translator">This could not have been a small
town if it furnished the amount of food and wine which the text implies.
Caesar speaks of it as <q rend="double">oppido pleno atque opulento.</q></note>
to which he came refused to open its gates to him, and he took it by storm
and allowed his army to plunder it. The soldiers, who had suffered much from
hunger, stuffed themselves immoderately and drank wine to excess. The
Germans among them were especially ridiculous under the influence of drink.
It seems probable that Pompey might have attacked them then and gained
another victory had he not disdainfully neglected a close pursuit. After
seven days of rapid marching Caesar encamped near Pharsalus. It is
said that among the notable calamities of Gomphi the bodies of twenty
venerable men of the first rank were found lying on the floor in an
apothecary’s shop, not wounded, and with goblets near them, as though they
were drunk, and that one of them, like a physician, was seated in a chair
and had dealt out poison to them.<note resp="translator">This incident contains a whole volume of the horrors of war to
non-combatants in the ancient world. Here was a prosperous town of
Thessaly blotted out of existence in a few hours’ time. Caesar
says that the Thessalians at first espoused his cause but that they
turned against him when they heard of his defeat at Dyrrachium.
Naturally so. As they had no interest in the quarrel they were bound to
be on the stronger side if they knew which it was. Their principal
citizens guessed wrong, their town was destroyed, and they committed
suicide in consequence. This was only one case among thousands.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="65" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After Caesar had withdrawn Pompey called a council of war, at which
Afranius advised that they should make use of their naval force in which
they were much superior, and being masters of the sea should harass
Caesar, who was now wandering and destitute, and that Pompey
himself should conduct his infantry with all haste to Italy, which was well
disposed toward him and was now free from a hostile army. Having mastered
it, together with Gaul and Spain, they could attack Caesar again
from their own home, the seat of imperial power. Although this was the best
possible advice Pompey disregarded it and allowed himself to be persuaded by
those who said that Caesar’s army would presently desert to him on
account of hunger, and that there was not much left of it anyway after the
victory of Dyrrachium. They said it would be disgraceful to abandon the
pursuit of Caesar when he was in flight, and for the victor to flee
as though vanquished.<note resp="translator">Both
Plutarch and Caesar give entertaining accounts of what took
place in Pompey’s camp after Caesar’s retreat. <q rend="double">They cried
out,</q> says the former, <q rend="double">that Caesar had fled. Some wanted to
pursue him, others to cross over to Italy. Others despatched their
friends and servants to Rome to hire houses in advance near the forum,
as though they were about to run for office.</q> (<title>Life of
Pompey,</title> 66.) Caesar’s narrative says: <q rend="double">They
contended with each other openly about rewards and priesthoods and
disposed of the consulship for years to come. Some demanded the houses
and goods of men in Caesar’s camp, and there was a great
controversy over the question whether Lucius Hirrus, who had been sent
by Pompey on a mission to the Parthians, should have the right to stand
for the next praetorship while absent. . . . Domitius, Scipio,
and Lentulus Spinther had daily disputes over the succession to
Caesar’s priesthood and descended to the vilest language,
Lentulus claiming it on the score of age, Domitius boasting of his
influence in the city and his dignity, while Scipio trusted to his
relationship with Pompey. Acutius Rufus even accused Afranius, in
Pompey’s presence, of betrayal of his army, which he said had been done
in Spain.</q> (iii. 82-83.)</note> Pompey sided with these advisers partly
out of regard for the opinions of the eastern nations that were looking on,
partly to prevent any harm befalling Lucius Scipio, who was still in
Macedonia, but most of all because he thought that he ought to fight while
his army was in high spirits. Accordingly he advanced and pitched his camp
opposite to Caesar’s near Pharsalus, so that they were separated
from each other by a distance of thirty stades. </p>
</div><div n="66" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompey’s supplies came from every quarter, for the roads, harbors, and
strongholds had been so provided beforehand that food was brought to him at
all times from the land, and every wind blew it to him from the sea.
Caesar, on the other hand, had only what he could find with
difficulty and seize by hard labor. Yet even so nobody deserted him, but
all, by a kind of divine fury, longed to come to close quarters with the
enemy. They considered that they, who had been trained in arms for ten
years, were much superior to the new levies of Pompey in fighting, but that
for digging ditches and building fortifications and for laborious foraging
they were weaker by reason of their age. Tired as they were they altogether
preferred to perform some deed of valor rather than perish with hunger in
inaction. Pompey perceived this and he considered it dangerous to risk
everything on a single battle with disciplined and desperate men, and
against the amazing luck of Caesar. It would be easier and safer to
reduce them by want as they controlled no fertile territory, and could get
nothing by sea, and had no ships for rapid flight. So he decided on the most
prudent calculation to protract the war and wear out the enemy by hunger
from day to day.<note resp="translator">Literally, <q rend="double">to
lead the enemy around from hunger to hunger,</q> <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐς
λιμὸν ἐκ λιμοῦ.</foreign> Mendelssohn prefers to read <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐς λοιμὸν ἐκ λιμοῦ,</foreign> <q rend="double">from famine to
plague,</q> and he refers to Plutarch (<title>Life of
Cœsar,</title> 40), who says that it was reported in
Pompey’s camp that a pestilence had broken out in Caesar’s army
in consequence of their unaccustomed diet. There is no authority for
this change nor does it improve the text in any way. As Caesar
was living off the country he would be obliged to move frequently <q rend="double">from
hunger to hunger.</q></note>
</p>
</div><div n="67" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompey was surrounded by a great number of senators, of equal rank with
himself, by very distinguished knights, and by many kings and princes. Some
of these, by reason of their inexperience in war, others because they were
too much elated by the victory at Dyrrachium, others because they
outnumbered the enemy, and others because they were quite tired of the war
and preferred a quick decision rather than a sound one — all urged him to
fight, pointing out to him that Caesar was always drawn up for
battle and challenging him. Pompey answered along this very line of argument
by saying that Caesar was compelled to do so by his want of
supplies, and that they had the more reason to remain quiet because
Caesar was pushed by necessity. Yet, harassed by the whole army,
which was unduly puffed up by the victories at Dyrrachium, and by men of
rank who accused him of being fond of power and of delaying purposely in
order to prolong his authority over so many men of his own rank — and for
this reason called him derisively king of kings and Agamemnon,<note resp="translator">Plutarch says that this nickname
was bestowed upon Pompey by Domitius Ahenobarbus, the same who was sent
to supersede Caesar in Gaul and who fell into the latter’s
hands at Corfinium, and was dismissed with contempt. He was an intense
aristocrat, enormously rich, and he hated Caesar with fury. He
was killed in the pursuit after Pharsalus. During the exchange of
pleasantries at Pompey’s head — quarters <q rend="double">Afranius, who had been
accused of betraying his army in Spain, when he saw Pompey trying to
avoid a battle said he wondered why his accusers did not move forward
and fight this huckster of provinces.</q> Favonius, who had suggested
before they left Italy that Pompey should stamp armies out of the
ground, now said: <q rend="double">Gentlemen, we shall not partake of the figs at
Tusculum this year.</q> (<title>Life of Pompey,</title> 67.)</note> because
that general also ruled over kings while war lasted — he allowed himself to
be moved from his own purpose and gave in to them, being deceived now by the
god that had misled him on other occasions during the whole of this war. He
had now become, contrary to his nature, sluggish and dilatory in all
things,<note resp="translator">The text, or at all
events the punctuation, is here doubtful. I have followed that of
Schweighäuser but his Latin version does not accord with it:
Tandem a proposito se moveri passus, deo jam exitium ejus properante,
concessit illorum voluntati. Quemadmodum et alias per totum illud bellum
contra naturam suam, tardus fuerat et veluti torpidus, sic nunc, etc.,
<emph>i.e.:</emph> <q rend="double">Finally allowing himself to be moved from
his purpose he yielded to their wish, a god now hurrying him to his
doom. As in other matters he had been, contrary to his nature, sluggish
and as it were stupefied through this whole war, so now,</q> etc.</note>
and he prepared for battle against his will, to his own hurt and that of the
men who had persuaded him to it. </p>
</div><div n="68" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>That same night three of Caesar’s legions started out to forage; for
Caesar himself approved Pompey’s dilatory proceedings and had no
idea that he would change, and accordingly sent them out to procure food.
When he perceived that the enemy was preparing to fight he was delighted at
the pressure which he conjectured had been put upon Pompey by his army, and
he recalled all of his forces at once and made preparations on his own side.
He offered sacrifice at midnight and invoked Mars and his own ancestress,
Venus (for it was believed that from Aeneas and his son, Ilus, was
descended the Julian race, with a slight change of name), and he vowed that
he would build a temple in Rome as a thank-offering to her as the Bringer of
Victory if everything went well. Thereupon a flame from heaven flew through
the air from Caesar’s camp to Pompey’s, where it was extinguished.
Pompey’s men said that it signified a brilliant victory for them over their
enemies, but Caesar interpreted it as meaning that he should fall
upon and extinguish the fame and power of Pompey. When Pompey was
sacrificing the same night some of the victims escaped and could not be
caught, and a swarm of bees settled on the altar, the type of weakness.<note resp="translator">These prodigies, with some slight
variations, are related by Plutarch, by Lucan, and by Florus. <q rend="double">Never,</q>
 says Florus, <q rend="double">were there more manifest signs of impending ruin.</q></note>
Shortly before daylight a panic occurred in his army. He himself went around
and quieted it and then fell into a deep sleep. </p>
</div><div n="69" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When his friends aroused him he said that he had just dreamed that he had
dedicated a temple in Rome to Venus the Bringer of Victory. His friends and
his whole army when they heard of this were delighted, being in ignorance of
Caesar’s vow, and they went about their work in a reckless and
contemptuous way as though it were already accomplished. Many of them
adorned their tents with laurel branches, the insignia of victory, and their
slaves prepared magnificent banquets for them. Some of them began already to
contend with each other for Caesar’s office of Pontifex Maximus.
Pompey, being experienced in military affairs, turned away from these
squabbles with concealed indignation. He remained altogether silent in
hesitancy and dread, as though he were no longer commander but under
command, and as though he were doing everything under compulsion and against
his judgment; such dejection had come over this man of great deeds (who,
until this day, had been most fortunate in every undertaking), either
because he had not carried his point when he had decided what was the best
course but was about to cast the die involving the safety of so many men and
also involving his own reputation, until now invincible; or because some
presentiment of approaching evil troubled him, presaging his complete
downfall that very day from a position of such vast power. After merely
saying to his friends that whichever should conquer, that day would be the
beginning of great evils to the Romans for all future time, he began to make
arrangements for the battle. In this remark some people thought his real
intentions escaped him, involuntarily expressed in a moment of fright, and
they inferred that if Pompey had been victorious he would not have laid down
the supreme power. </p>
</div><div n="70" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Caesar’s army (for since many writers differ I shall follow the most
credible Roman authorities, who give the most careful enumeration of the
Italian soldiers, in whom they place most confidence, but do not make much
account of the allied forces or record them exactly, regarding them as
foreigners and as contributing to them little real assistance) consisted of
about 22,000 men and of these about 1000 were cavalry. Pompey had more than
double that number, of whom about 7000 were cavalry. Some of the most
trustworthy writers say that 70,000 Italian soldiers were engaged in this
battle. Others give the smaller number, 60,00000. Still others, grossly
exaggerating, say 400,000.<note resp="translator">One of
the grossly exaggerating writers is Florus, who says: <q rend="double">Never did fortune
behold so large a force of the Roman people or so much of their dignity
collected in one place. More than 300,000 men were assembled on one side
and the other, in addition to the auxiliaries of kings and
nations.</q></note> Of the whole number some say Pompey’s forces were to
those of Caesar as one-and-a-half to one, others say that he had
two parts out of three. So much doubt is there as to the exact truth.
However that may be, each of them placed his chief reliance on his Italian
troops. In the way of allied forces Caesar had cavalry from both
Cisalpine and Transalpine Gaul, besides some light-armed Greeks, consisting
of Dolopians, Acarnanians, and Aetolians. Such were
Caesar’s allies. Pompey had a great number from all the eastern
nations, part horse, part foot. From Greece he had Lacedemonians marshalled
by their own kings, and others from Peloponnesus and Bœotians with
them. The Athenians marched to his aid also, although proclamation had been
made on both sides that no harm should be done to them by the soldiers,
since they were the priests of the Thesmophorae.<note resp="translator">The Thesmophorae
(law-bringers) were Ceres and Proserpine. They were worshipped together
as the goddesses of tillage and civilized life. The Thesmophoria was an
annual religious festival at Athens.</note> Nevertheless, they wished to
share in the glory of the war because this was a contest for the Roman
leadership.<note resp="translator">Schweighäuser says that the meaning of this passage is not
quite clear to him. Combes-Dounous renders it intelligibly: <q rend="double">They came
to take part in this war merely to have the glory of fighting in a
contest where the empire of the Roman people was at stake.</q></note>
</p>
</div><div n="71" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Besides the Greeks almost all the nations that one meets in making the
circuit of the eastern sea sent aid to Pompey: Thracians, Hellespontines,
Bithynians, Phrygians, Ionians, Lydians, Pamphylians, Pisidians,
Paphlagonians, Cilicians, Syrians, Phœnicians, Hebrews, and their
neighbors the Arabs, Cyprians, Rhodians, Cretan slingers, and other
islanders. Kings and princes were there leading their own troops:
Deïotarus, the tetrarch of Galatia in the East, and Ariarthes, king
of Cappadocia. Taxiles commanded <figure>
<head>THESSALY &amp; SOUTHERN MACEDONIA</head>
</figure>
</p>
<p>the Armenians from the hither side of the Euphrates. Those from the other
side were led by Megabates, the lieutenant of King Artabazes. Some other
small princes took part with Pompey in the work. It was said that sixty
ships from Egypt were contributed to him by the sovereigns of that country,
Cleopatra and her brother, who was still a boy. But these did not take part
in the battle, nor did any other naval force. They remained idle at Corcyra.
Pompey seems to have acted very foolishly in this respect in disregarding
the fleet, in which he excelled so greatly that he could have deprived the
enemy of all the supplies brought to them from abroad, and in risking a
battle on land with men who boasted that they were inured to every kind of
toil and who were ferocious fighters. Although he had been on his guard
against them at Dyrrachium, a certain spell seems to have come over him at a
time when it would inure most to Caesar’s advantage. Under this
spell also Pompey’s army was most nonsensically puffed up, and rendered
insubordinate to its own commander, and hurried into action without previous
experience in war. But this was the ordering of divine Providence to bring
in the imperial power which now embraces everything.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="11" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XI</head>
<head>Speeches of the Commanders — Preparations for Battle — Battle of
Pharsalus — Total defeat of the Pompeians Flight of Pompey — Losses on
both sides</head>
<div n="72" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Then each of the commanders assembled his soldiers and made an appeal to
them. Pompey spoke as follows: <q rend="double">You, my fellow soldiers, are the leaders in
this task rather than the led, for while I was still desirous of wearing
Caesar out by hunger you urged on this engagement. Since,
therefore, you are the arbiters of the battle, conduct yourselves like those
who are greatly superior in numbers. Despise the enemy as victors do the
vanquished, as young men do the old, as fresh troops do those who are
wearied with many toils. Fight like those who have the power and the means,
and the consciousness of a good cause. We are contending for liberty and
country. On our side are the laws and honorable fame, and this great number
of senators and knights, against one man who has seized the government by
robbery.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">Πρὸς ἄνδρα ἕνα λῃστεύοντα τὴν
ἡγεμονίαν.</foreign> This might be translated in the words of
Hamlet: <q rend="double">The cutpurse of the empire and the rule.</q></note> Go forward
then, as you have determined to do, with good hope, keeping in vision the
flight of the enemy at Dyrrachium, and the great number of their standards
that we captured in one day when we defeated them there.</q> Such was Pompey’s
speech. </p>
</div><div n="73" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Caesar addressed his men as follows: <q rend="double">My friends, we have already
overcome our most formidable enemies, and are now about to encounter not
hunger and want, but men. This day will decide everything. Remember what you
promised me at Dyrrachium. Remember how you swore to each other in my
presence that you would never leave the field except as conquerors. These
men, fellow-soldiers, are the same that we met at the Pillars of Hercules,
the same that we drove out of Italy. They are the same who sought to disband
us without honors, without a triumph, without rewards, after the toils and
struggles of ten years, after we had finished those great wars, after
innumerable victories, and after we had added 400 nations in Spain, Gaul,
and Britain to our country’s sway. I have not been able to prevail upon them
by offering fair terms, nor to win them by benefits. You know that I
dismissed them unharmed, hoping that we should obtain justice from them.
Recall all these facts to your minds to-day, and if you have had any
experience of me recall also my care for you, my good faith, and the
generosity of my gifts to you.</q></p></div>
 <div n="74" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p><q rend="double; merge">Nor is it difficult for hardy and veteran soldiers to overcome new
recruits who are without experience in war, and who, moreover, like boys,
spurn the rules of discipline and of obedience to their commander. I learn
that he was afraid and unwilling to come to an engagement. His star has
already passed its zenith; he has become slow and hesitating in all his
acts, and no longer commands, but obeys the orders of others. I say these
things of his Italian forces only. As for his allies, do not think about
them, pay no attention to them, do not fight with them at all. They are
Syrian, Phrygian, and Lydian slaves, always ready for flight or servitude. I
know very well, and you will presently see, that Pompey himself will not
assign them any place in his line of battle. Give your attention to the
Italians only, even though these allies come running around you like dogs
trying to frighten you. When you have put the enemy to flight let us spare
the Italians as being our own kindred, but slaughter the allies in order to
strike terror into the others. Before all else, in order that I may know
that you are mindful of your promise to choose victory or death, throw down
the walls of your camp as you go out to battle and fill up the ditch, so
that we may have no place of refuge if we do not conquer, and so that the
enemy may see that we have no camp and know that we are compelled to occupy
theirs.</q><note resp="translator">Caesar’s
speech, as given in his own Commentaries, bears no resemblance to this.
 <q rend="double">He exhorted the army to battle,</q> he says, <q rend="double">according to the military
custom, and spoke of the kindness he had shown them at all times, and
especially reminded them, as the soldiers themselves could bear witness,
with what earnestness he had sought for peace, what efforts he had made
in his conference with Vatinius, what he had endeavored to do in the
negotiation with Scipio through Aulus Claudius, and how he had labored
with Libo at Oricum for the privilege of sending legates. He said that
he never willingly shed the blood of his soldiers, and that it was not
his wish that the republic should lose one of its armies. Having spoken
thus he gave the signal by trumpet to the soldiers, who were eagerly
awaiting it and burning with zeal for the battle.</q> (iii. go.) Suetonius,
Florus, and Lucan mention Caesar’s appeal to his soldiers to
spare their fellow-citizens in the pursuit, but Florus says it was
intended only for effect. Lucan refers to Caesar’s order to
demolish the fortifications of his camp before the battle.
(<title>Pharsalia,</title> vii. 326.)</note></p></div>
<div n="75" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Nevertheless, after he had thus spoken Caesar detailed 2000 of his
oldest men to guard the tents. The rest, as they passed out, demolished
their fortification in the profoundest silence and filled up the ditch with
the debris. When Pompey saw this, although some of his friends thought that
it was a preparation for flight, he knew it was an exhibition of daring and
groaned in spirit, that although they had with them famine, the most
appropriate cure for such wild beasts, he must now meet these creatures in a
hand-to-hand contest. But there was no drawing back now, his affairs being
on the razor’s edge.<note resp="translator">This is a
Greek proverb found in Homer, Herodotus, and several other authors,
cited by Combes-Dounous, and also in Liddell and Scott’s lexicon under
<foreign xml:lang="grc">ξυρόν.</foreign></note> Wherefore, leaving
4000 of his Italian troops to guard his camp, Pompey drew up the remainder
between the city of Pharsalus and the river Enipeus opposite the place where
Caesar was marshalling his forces. Each of them ranged his Italians
in front, divided into three lines with a moderate space between them, and
placed his cavalry on the wings of each division. Archers and slingers were
mingled among all. Thus were the Italian troops disposed, on which each
commander placed his chief reliance. The allied forces were marshalled by
themselves rather for show than for use. There was great clamor and
confusion of tongues among Pompey’s auxiliaries. Pompey stationed the
Macedonians, Peloponnesians, Bœotians, and Athenians near the
Italian legions, as he approved of their good order and quiet behavior. The
rest, as Caesar had anticipated, he ordered to lie in wait by
tribes outside of the line of battle, and when the engagement should become
close to surround the enemy, to pursue, to do what damage they could, and to
plunder Caesar’s camp, which was without defences. </p>
</div><div n="76" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The centre of Pompey’s formation was commanded by his father-in-law, Scipio,
the left wing by Domitius Ahenobarbus, and the right by Lentulus. Afranius
and Pompey guarded the camp.<note resp="translator">This
is a strange blunder, and is inconsistent with the author’s own account
of Pompey’s subsequent movements. A few lines below he says that after
the line of battle was formed each commander moved about among the ranks
encouraging his men, and in Sec. 81 he says that when Pompey saw the
flight of his men he slowly retired to his camp. Caesar says
that Pompey commanded the left wing of his army in person. Plutarch says
he commanded the right wing. Of course Caesar’s testimony is to
be preferred.</note> On Caesar’s side the commanders were P.
Sulla, Antony, and Cn. Domitius. Caesar took a convenient place in
the tenth legion, as was his custom. When the enemy saw this they
transferred, to face that legion, the best of their horse, in order to
surround it if they could, by their superiority of numbers. When
Caesar perceived this movement he placed 3000 of his bravest
foot-soldiers in ambush and ordered them, when they should see the enemy
trying to flank him, to rise, dart forward, and thrust their spears directly
in the faces of the men because, as they were fresh and inexperienced and
still in the bloom of youth, they could not endure injury to their
faces.<note resp="translator">Caesar’s
account of this manœuvre is as follows: <q rend="double">Fearing lest his
right wing should be surrounded by the greater number of the enemy’s
horse he rapidly withdrew from the third line one cohort from each
legion, and from these formed a fourth line and ranged them in
opposition to the enemy’s cavalry and explained what he wished them to
do and admonished them that the success of this day depended on their
valor.</q> (iii. 89.) He says nothing about aiming at the faces of the
enemy. It is mentioned by Plutarch, by Lucan, and by Florus, but is
probably a fable.</note> Thus they laid their plans against each other,
and each commander passed through the ranks of his own troops, attending to
what was needful, exhorting his men to courage, and giving them the
watchword, which on Caesar’s side was <q rend="double">Venus the Victorious,</q> and
on Pompey’s <q rend="double">Hercules the Invincible.</q> </p>
</div><div n="77" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When all was in readiness on both sides they waited for some time in profound
silence, hesitating, looking steadfastly at each other, each expecting the
other to begin the battle. They were stricken with sorrow for the great
host, for never before had such large Roman armies confronted the same
danger together. They had pity for the valor of these men (the elite of both
parties), especially because they saw Romans embattled against Romans. As
the danger came nearer, the ambition that had inflamed and blinded them was
extinguished, and gave place to fear. Reason purged the mad passion for
glory, estimated the peril, and exposed the cause of the war, showing how
two men contending with each other for supremacy had put themselves in a
position where the one who should be vanquished could no longer hold even
the humblest place, and how so great a number of the nobility were incurring
the same risk on their account. The leaders reflected also that they, who
had lately been friends and relatives by marriage, and had
coöperated with each other in many ways to gain rank and power, had
now drawn the sword for mutual slaughter and were leading to the same
impiety those serving under them, men of the same city, of the same tribe,
blood relations, and in some cases brothers against brothers. Even these
circumstances were not wanting in this battle; because many unexpected
things must happen when thousands of the same nation come together in the
clash of arms. Reflecting on these things each of them was seized with
unavailing repentance, and since this day was to decide for each whether he
should be the highest or the lowest of the human race, they hesitated to
begin the fight. It is said that both of them shed tears.<note resp="translator">This is a chapter of moralizing
quite unusual in the writings of Appian. The view which he takes of this
war, that it was merely a contest between two ambitious chieftains,
instead of being one incident in a long struggle between a corrupt
oligarchy and a debased democracy, was commonly held by men of letters
until comparatively recent times.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="78" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While they were waiting and looking at each other the day was advancing. All
the Italian troops stood motionless in their places, but when Pompey saw
that his allied forces were falling into confusion by reason of the delay he
feared lest the disorder should spread from them before the beginning of the
battle. So he gave the signal first and Caesar reëchoed
it. Straightway the trumpets, of which there were many distributed among so
great a host, aroused the soldiers with their inspiring blasts, and the
standard-bearers and officers put themselves in motion and exhorted their
men. The latter advanced confidently to the encounter, but with stolidity
and absolute silence, like men who had had experience in many similar
engagements. And now, as they came nearer together, there was first a
discharge of arrows and stones. Then as the cavalry were a little in advance
of the infantry they charged each other. Those of Pompey prevailed and began
to flank the tenth legion. Caesar then gave the signal to the
cohorts in ambush and these, starting up suddenly, advanced to meet the
cavalry, and with spears elevated aimed at the faces of the riders. The
latter could not endure the enemy’s savagery, nor the blows on their mouths
and eyes, but fled in disorder. Thereupon Caesar’s men,<note resp="translator">The text says <q rend="double">Caesar’s
horse,</q> but Schweighäuser considers this a manifest error since
Appian, in Sec. 79, says that it was the tenth legion that struck
Pompey’s left flank. Caesar himself says that the six cohorts
in reserve executed this decisive movement. At all events it could not
have been Caesar’s horse.</note> who had just now been afraid
of being surrounded, fell upon the flank of Pompey’s infantry which was
denuded of its cavalry supports. </p>
</div><div n="79" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Pompey learned this he ordered his infantry not to advance farther, not
to break the line of formation, and not to hurl the javelin, but to bring
their spears to a rest and ward off the onset of the enemy. Some persons
praise this order of Pompey as the best in a case where one is attacked in
flank, but Caesar criticises it in his letters.<note resp="translator">There is some confusion here. Caesar
says (iii. 93) that at the beginning of the battle (not after the
repulse of his cavalry) Pompey ordered his soldiers not to move from
their places but to await the attack and not allow their line to be
broken, thinking that the space between the two armies was so great that
Caesar’s men if they charged across it would come up blown.
 <q rend="double">This,</q> he continues, <q rend="double">seems to me to have been an error on Pompey’s
part, because there is a certain ardor and eagerness of spirit inborn in
mankind, which is excited in the heat of battle, and which commanders
ought to encourage, not repress.</q></note> He says that the blows are
delivered with more force, and that the spirits of the men are raised, by
running, while those who stand still lose courage by reason of their
immobility and become excellent targets for those charging against them. So,
he says, it proved in this case, for the tenth legion, with Caesar
himself, surrounded Pompey’s left wing, now deprived of cavalry, and
assailed it with javelins in flank, where it stood immovable; until,
finally, the assailants threw it into disorder, routed it, and this was the
beginning of the victory. In the rest of the field killing and wounding of
all kinds were going on, but no cry came from the scene of carnage, no
lamentation from the wounded or the dying, only sighs and groans from those
who were falling honorably in their tracks. The allies, who were looking at
the battle as at a game, were astonished at the discipline of the
combatants. So dumfounded were they that they did not dare attack
Caesar’s tents, although they were guarded only by a few old men.
Nor did they accomplish anything else, but stood in a kind of stupor. </p>
</div><div n="80" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As Pompey’s left wing began to give way his men even still retired step by
step and in perfect order, but the allies who had not been in the fight,
fled with headlong speed, shouting, <q rend="double">we are vanquished,</q> dashed upon their
own tents and fortifications as though they had been the enemy’s, and pulled
down and plundered whatever they could carry away in their flight. Now the
rest of Pompey’s legions, perceiving the disaster to the left wing, retired
slowly at first, in good order, and still resisting as well as they could;
but when the enemy, flushed with victory, pressed upon them they turned in
flight. Then, in order that they might not rally, and that this might be the
end of the whole war and not of one battle merely, Caesar, with the
greatest prudence, sent heralds everywhere among the ranks to order the
victors to spare their own countrymen and to smite only the auxiliaries. The
heralds drew near to the retreating enemy and told them to stand still
without fear. As this proclamation was passed from man to man they halted,
and the phrase <q rend="double">stand without fear</q> began to be passed as a sort of
watchword among Pompey’s soldiers; for, being Italians, they were clad in
the same style as Caesar’s men and spoke the same language.
Accordingly, the latter passed by them and fell upon the auxiliaries, who
were not able to resist, and made a very great slaughter among them.<note resp="translator">Caesar says that the
Pompeians fled to their fortified camp, and that, although it was now
midday and the heat was excessive, he exhorted his soldiers to make use
of their good fortune and storm the enemy’s entrenchments, and that they
obeyed cheerfully. After a short engagement here the Pompeians again
fled and took refuge in the high mountains adjacent. (iii. 95.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="81" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Pompey saw the retreat of his men he became dazed and retired slowly to
his camp, and when he reached his tent he sat down speechless,<note resp="translator">There is a striking similarity
here both in language and narrative, between Appian and Plutarch. The
former says: <quote>
<foreign xml:lang="grc">Πομπήϊος ἀπῄει βάδην ἐς τὸ
στρατόπεδον καὶ παρελθὼν ἐς τὴν σκηνὴν ἐκαθέζετο
ἄναυδος.</foreign>
</quote> The latter (<title>Life of Pompey,</title> 72) says: <quote>
<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀπῄει βάδην εἰς τὸν χάρακα . . . εἰς
τὴν σκηνὴν παρελθὼν ἄφθογγος καθῆστο.</foreign>
</quote> Here is fresh confirmation of the belief that both Appian and
Plutarch drew from a Greek, not from a Latin, source, for if they had
translated from Latin it is most improbable that they would have used
the same Greek words, in the same, or very nearly the same, order.
Moreover, both of them make reference here to the Iliad xi. 543, where
Ajax Telamon is smitten with panic by Zeus in the midst of battle.
Plutarch quotes the passage itself.</note> resembling Ajax, the son of
Telamon, who, they say, suffered in like manner in the midst of his enemies
at Troy, being deprived of his senses by a god. Very few of the rest
returned to the camp, for Caesar’s proclamation caused them to
remain unharmed, and as their enemies had passed beyond them they dispersed
in groups. As the day was declining Caesar ran hither and thither
among his troops and besought them to continue their exertions till they
should capture Pompey’s <figure>
<head>JULIUS CAeSAR AS IMPERATOR</head>
<figDesc>In the Palace of the Conservators, Rome</figDesc>
</figure>
</p>
<p>camp, telling them that if they allowed the enemy to rally they would be the
victors for only a single day, whereas if they should take the enemy’s camp
they would finish the war with this one blow. He stretched out his hands to
them and took the lead in person. Although they were weary in body, the
words and example of their commander lightened their spirits. Their success
so far, and the hope of capturing the enemy’s camp and the contents thereof,
excited them; for in the midst of hope and prosperity men feel fatigue
least. So they fell upon the camp and assaulted it with the utmost disdain
for the defenders. When Pompey learned this he started up from his strange
silence, exclaiming, <q rend="double">What! in our very camp?</q> Having spoken thus he changed
his clothing, mounted a horse, and fled with four friends, and did not draw
rein until he reached Larissa early the next morning. So Caesar
established himself in Pompey’s camp as he had promised to do when he was
preparing for the battle, and ate Pompey’s supper, and the whole army
feasted at the enemy’s expense.<note resp="translator">Plutarch’s account of Pompey’s flight is in nearly the same words, viz:
 <q rend="double">He sat in silence until some of those who were pursuing the fugitives
rushed in with them, when he uttered the single sentence: <q rend="single">What! in our
very camp?</q> He spoke not another word, but put on clothing suited to
his present fortune and stole away.</q> (<title>Life of Pompey,</title>
72.) Caesar says: <q rend="double">When our men forced their way into his
intrenchment Pompey threw off his general’s uniform, mounted a horse,
went out by the rear gate of his camp and urged his horse with all speed
to Larissa. Nor did he stop there, but with the same speed, having
collected a few of his scattered soldiers, still travelling by night,
with a company of thirty horsemen, he pushed on to the sea where he
embarked on a supply ship,</q> etc. (iii. 96.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="82" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The losses of Italians on each side — for there was no report of the losses
of auxiliaries, either because of their multitude or because they were
despised — were as follows: in Caesar’s army. thirty centurions
and 200 legionaries, or, as some authorities have it, 1200; on Pompey’s side ten senators, among whom was Lucius
Domitius, the same who had been sent to succeed Caesar himself in
Gaul, and about forty distinguished knights. Some exaggerating writers put
the loss in the remainder of his forces at 25,000, but Asinius Pollio, who
was one of Caesar’s officers in this battle, records the number of
dead Pompeians found as 6000.<note resp="translator">Caesar puts his own loss at thirty centurions and 200 private
soldiers, and Pompey’s at 15,000 killed and 24,000 prisoners. We must
infer that Appian was not acquainted with Caesar’s
Commentaries, for if he had been he would most probably have quoted him
here instead of referring in a loose way to <q rend="double">exaggerating
writers.</q></note> Such was the result of the famous battle of Pharsalus.
Caesar himself carries off the palm for first and second place by
common consent, and with him the tenth legion. The third place is taken by
the centurion Crastinus, whom Caesar asked at the beginning of the
battle what result he anticipated, and who responded proudly, <q rend="double">We shall
conquer, O Caesar, and you will thank me either living or dead.</q> 
The whole army testifies that he darted through the ranks like one possessed
and did many brilliant deeds. When sought for he was found among the dead,
and Caesar bestowed military honors on his body and buried it, and
erected a special tomb for him near the common burial-place of the
others.<note resp="translator">The affair of
Crastinus is mentioned by Caesar, by Florus, and by Plutarch in
his life of Pompey and again in his life of Caesar. The
reference here made to Asinius Pollio has led to much discussion in the
learned world, touching the sources from which Appian and Plutarch drew.
The words used by Crastinus are almost identical in the three passages
(one of Appian and two of Plutarch), and this leads Wynne, Hulleman, and
Hermann Peter to believe that both authors borrowed from Pollio’s
history. Vollgraff on the other hand contends that as Pollio wrote in
Latin it would have been little less than miraculous if both of them had
used the same Greek words in translating it. He considers it remarkable
also that the only reference made to Pollio’s writings by either of them
should have been here, and that both of them mentioned incidentally the
fact that Pollio himself took part in the engagement. All of these
coincidences may be explained if we suppose that both Plutarch and
Appian took the facts from a common Greek source; that is, from some
author who took them from Pollio. (See Vollgraff’s <title>Greek Writers
of Roman History,</title> Leyden, <date when="1880">1880</date>.)</note>
</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XII</head>
<head>Pompey sails for Egypt — Is assassinated there — Retreat of the
Pompeians to Africa</head>

<div n="83" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>From Larissa Pompey continued his flight to the sea where he embarked in a
small boat, and meeting a ship by chance he sailed to Mitylene. There he
joined his wife, Cornelia, and they embarked with four triremes which had
come to him from Rhodes and Tyre. He decided not to sail for Corcyra and
Africa, where he had other large military and naval forces as yet untouched,
but intended to push on eastward to the king of the Parthians, expecting to
receive every assistance from him. He concealed his intention until he
arrived at Cilicia, where he revealed it hesitatingly to his friends; but
they advised him to beware of the Parthian, against whom Crassus had lately
led an expedition, and who was puffed up by his victory over the latter, and
especially not to put in the power of these barbarians the beautiful
Cornelia, who had formerly been the wife of Crassus.<note resp="translator">The younger Crassus, who lost his life in the war
against the Parthians.</note> Then he made a second proposal respecting
Egypt and Juba.<note resp="translator">King of Numidia.
See Sec. 44 <emph>supra.</emph></note> The latter they despised as
not sufficiently distinguished, but they all agreed about going to Egypt,
which was near and was a great kingdom, still prosperous and abounding in
ships, provisions, and money. Its sovereigns, although children, were allied
to Pompey by their father’s friendship. For these reasons he sailed to
Egypt. </p>
</div><div n="84" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Cleopatra, who had previously reigned with her brother, had been lately
expelled from Egypt and was collecting an army in Syria. Ptolemy, her
brother, was at Mount Casius in Egypt,<note resp="translator">The modern Mount El Kas. There was another Mount Casius in
Syria.</note> lying in wait for her invasion, and, as Providence would
have it, the wind carried Pompey thither. Seeing a large army on the shore
he stopped his ship, judging that the king was there, which was the fact. So
he sent messengers to tell of his arrival and to speak of his father’s
friendship. The king was then about thirteen years of age and was under the
tutelage of Achillas, who commanded his army, and the eunuch Pothinus, who
had charge of his treasury. These took counsel together concerning Pompey.
There was present also Theodotus, a rhetorician of Samos, the boy’s tutor,
who offered the infamous advice that they should lay a trap for Pompey and
kill him in order to curry favor with Caesar.<note resp="translator">Theodotus argued (says Plutarch) <q rend="double">that if they
should give shelter to the fugitive they would have Caesar for
an enemy and Pompey for a master; if they should send him away he would
be offended by their want of hospitality, and Caesar would be
angry with them for letting him escape. The best way would be to send
for him and kill him. In that way they would gratify the one and need
not fear the other. He added with a smile that dead men do not bite.</q> 
(<title>Life of Pompey,</title> 77).</note> His opinion prevailed.
So they sent a miserable skiff to bring him, pretending that the sea was
shallow and not adapted to large ships. Some of the king’s attendants came
in the skiff, among them a Roman, named Sempronius,<note resp="translator">Caesar, Plutarch, Florus, and Dion
Cassius, give this miscreant the name of Septimius. Caesar says
that he was a military tribune and that he had served under Pompey in
the war against the pirates. Florus adds that he was a deserter from
Pompey’s army.</note> who was then serving in the king’s army and had
formerly served under Pompey himself. He gave his hand to Pompey in the
king’s name and directed him to take passage in the boat to the young man as
to a friend. At the same time the whole army was marshalled along the shore
as if to do honor to Pompey, and the king was plainly seen in the midst of
them wearing a purple robe. </p>
</div><div n="85" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompey’s suspicions were aroused by all that he observed — the marshalling
of the army, the meanness of the skiff, and the fact that the king himself
did not come to meet him nor send any of his high dignitaries. Nevertheless,
he entered the skiff, repeating to himself these lines of Sophocles,
 <q rend="double">Whoever resorts to a tyrant becomes his slave, even if he were free when he
went.</q> While rowing to the shore all were silent, and this made him still
more suspicious. Finally, either recognizing Sempronius as a Roman soldier
who had served under him or guessing that he was such because he alone
remained standing (for, according to military discipline, a soldier does not
sit in the presence of his commander), he turned to him and said, <q rend="double">Do I not
know you, comrade?</q> The other nodded and, as Pompey turned away, he
immediately gave him the first stab and the others followed his example.
Pompey’s wife and friends who saw this at a distance cried out and, lifting
their hands to heaven, invoked the gods, the avengers of violated faith.
Then they sailed away in all haste as from an enemy’s country. </p>
</div><div n="86" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The servants of Pothinus cut off Pompey’s head and kept it for
Caesar, in expectation of a large reward, but he visited condign
punishment on them for their nefarious deed. The remainder of the body was
buried by somebody on the shore, and a small monument was erected over it,
on which somebody else wrote this inscription: —</p>
 <p><q rend="double">What a pitiful tomb is here for one who had temples in abundance.</q><note resp="translator">Plutarch gives a pathetic account
of Pompey’s funeral, which was performed by his freedman Philippus and
one old Roman who had served as a soldier under him, and who was now
living in exile and poverty. <q rend="double">Such,</q> says another historian, <q rend="double">was the
departure from life of a most excellent and illustrious man, after three
consulships and as many triumphs, who had ruled the whole world and had
reached a position above which it was not possible to rise, in the 58th
year of his age and on the day before his birthday. So greatly had
fortune been at strife with herself in his case that he who had been in
want of earth to conquer was now in want of enough for a grave.</q> 
(<title>Velleius,</title> ii. 53.) Dio Cassius (lxix. 11),
describing the Emperor Hadrian’s tour in the East A.D. <date when="0122">122</date>, says that <q rend="double">while he was passing from Judea to Egypt he
offered a funeral sacrifice for Pompey, on which occasion the following
verse escaped him: <q rend="single">What a pitiful tomb is here for one who had temples
in abundance.</q> He also rebuilt the tomb that had fallen into ruin.</q> This
is not inconsistent with Appian’s narrative.</note></p>
<p>In the course of time the monument was wholly covered with sand, and the
bronze images that had been erected to Pompey by his partisans at a later
period near Mount Casius had been degraded and removed to the secret recess
of the temple, but in my time they were sought for and found by the Roman
emperor Hadrian, while making a journey thither, who cleared away the
rubbish from the monument and made it again conspicuous, and placed Pompey’s
images in their proper places. Such was the end of Pompey, who had carried
on the greatest wars and had made the greatest additions to the empire of
the Romans, and had acquired by that means the title of Great. He had never
been defeated before,<note resp="translator">This is an
error. Pompey was defeated by Sertorius in Spain, and the fact is
mentioned in so many words by Appian himself in the preceding book Sec.
110: <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ δὲ Σερτώριος ἐνίκα
Πομπήϊον.</foreign></note> but had remained unvanquished and most
fortunate from his youth till now. From his twenty-third to his fifty-eighth
year he had not ceased to exercise royal power, but on account of his
jealousy of Caesar he had seemed to rule in the interest of the
people. </p>
</div><div n="87" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Lucius Scipio, Pompey’s father-in-law, and the other notables who had escaped
from the battle of Pharsalus, more prudent than Pompey, proceeded to Corcyra
and joined Cato, who had been left there with another army and 300 triremes.
The leaders apportioned the fleet among themselves, and Cassius sailed to
Pharnaces in Pontus to induce him to take up arms against Caesar.
Scipio and Cato embarked for Africa, relying on Varus and his army and his
ally, Juba, king of Numidia. The elder son of Pompey, together with Labienus
and Scapula, each with his own part of the army, hastened to Spain and,
having detached it from Caesar, collected a new army of Spaniards,
Celtiberians, and slaves, and made formidable preparations for war. So great
were the forces still remaining which Pompey had prepared, and which Pompey
himself over-looked and ran away from in his insanity. Cato had been chosen
commander of the forces in Africa, but he declined the appointment since
there were consulars present who outranked him, he having held only the
praetorship in Rome. So Lucius Scipio was made the commander and he
collected and drilled a large army there. Thus two armies of considerable
magnitude were brought together against Caesar, one in Africa and
the other in Spain. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="13" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XIII</head>
<head>Caesar pursues Pompey — Passes through Asia Minor — The
Alexandrian War — The War against Pharnaces — Another Mutiny in
Caesar’s Army — Caesar disbands them at their Request
— Takes them back at their Entreaty</head>

<div n="88" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Caesar remained two days at Pharsalus after the victory, offering
sacrifice and giving his army a respite from fighting. Then he set free his
Thessalian allies and granted pardon to the suppliant Athenians, and said to
them, <q rend="double">How often will the glory of your ancestors save you from
self-destruction?</q> On the third day he marched eastward, having learned that
Pompey had fled thither, and for want of triremes he essayed to cross the
Hellespont in skiffs. Here Cassius came upon him in mid-stream, with a part
of his fleet, as he was hastening to Pharnaces. Although he might have
mastered these small boats with his numerous triremes he was panic-stricken
by Caesar’s astounding success, which was then heralded with
consternation everywhere, and he thought that Caesar had sailed
purposely against him. So he extended his hands in entreaty from his trireme
toward the skiff, begged pardon, and surrendered his fleet. So great was the
power of Caesar’s prestige. I can see no other reason myself, nor
can I think of any other instance where fortune was more propitious in a
trying emergency than when Cassius, a most valiant man, with seventy
triremes, fell in with Caesar when he was unprepared, but did not
venture to come to blows with him. And yet he who thus disgracefully
surrendered to Caesar, through fear alone, when the latter was
crossing the straits, afterward murdered him in Rome when he was at the
height of his power; by which fact it is evident that the panic which then
seized Cassius was due to the fortune by which Caesar was
uplifted.<note resp="translator">This is a dubious
tale. Caesar tells us (iii. 101) that Cassius was in Sicily
with a fleet when the news of Pharsalus arrived; that when the first
news of the battle came the Pompeians considered it a fiction invented
by Caesar’s friends, but that when they were convinced that it
was true, Cassius departed with his fleet. Then Caesar
describes his own movements, saying that he considered it necessary to
drop everything else and pursue Pompey, and that he pushed on every day
as far as his cavalry could go, having ordered one legion to follow by
shorter marches. He must have passed the Hellespont before Cassius
sailed from Sicily. Again, Cicero in his second Philippic (11), while
defending himself against Antony’s charge that he had advised the
assassination of Caesar, says that he is not entitled to share
this glory with Brutus and Cassius. Neither of them needed his advice. <q rend="double">
Cassius,</q> he adds, <q rend="double">would have done the deed himself in Cilicia, at the
mouth of the river Cydnus, without the help of his illustrious friends,
if Caesar had landed on the shore where he (Cassius) had
halted, instead of the opposite one.</q> In other words they passed each
other at the mouth of the Cydnus, as Caesar was proceeding to
Egypt. Suetonius (<title>Jul.</title> 63) says that it was Lucius
Cassius whom Caesar met in the Hellespont.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="89" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Being thus unexpectedly saved, Caesar passed the Hellespont and
granted pardon to the Ionians, the Aeolians, and the other peoples
who inhabit the great peninsula called by the common name of Lower Asia, and
who sent ambassadors to him to ask it. Learning that Pompey had gone to
Egypt he sailed for Rhodes. He did not wait there for his army, which was
coming forward by detachments, but embarked with those whom he had on board
the triremes of Cassius and the Rhodians. Letting nobody know whither he
intended to go he set sail toward evening, telling the other pilots to steer
by the torch of his own ship by night and by his signal in the daytime.
After they had proceeded a long way from the land he ordered his pilot to
steer for Alexandria. After a three days’ sail he arrived there. He was
received by the king’s guardians, the king himself being still at Mount
Casius. At first, on account of the smallness of his forces, he pretended to
take his ease, receiving visitors in a friendly way, traversing the city,
admiring its beauty, and listening to the lectures of the philosophers while
he stood among the crowd. Thus he gained the good-will and esteem of the
Alexandrians as one who had no designs against them. </p>
</div><div n="90" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When his soldiers arrived by sea he punished Pothinus and Achillas with death
for their crime against Pompey.<note resp="translator">Caesar says that he put Pothinus to death for corresponding
with the enemy while he was in Caesar’s custody, during the
Alexandrian war. (iii. 112.) Hirtius, who wrote the Alexandrian War,
says (i.4) that Achillas was put to death by Arsinoë, the
younger sister of Cleopatra, who attempted to bring about a counter
revolution and to secure the throne for herself. Plutarch contradicts
himself in this matter. In his <title>Life of Pompey</title> (80) he
says that Caesar put both Pothinus and Achillas to death and
implies that he did so to punish them for the murder of Pompey. In his
<title>Life of Cœsar</title> (49) he says distinctly that
Pothinus was put to death on account of a palace conspiracy against
Caesar in which both himself and Achillas were concerned, but
that Achillas escaped.</note> (Theodotus escaped and was afterward
crucified by Cassius, who found him wandering in Asia.<note resp="translator">Plutarch, at the conclusion of his <title>Life of
Pompey,</title> says that Theodotus was put to death with torture by
Brutus, who found him leading a vagabond life in Asia.</note>) The
Alexandrians thereupon rose in tumult, and the king’s army marched against
Caesar and various battles took place around the palace and on the
neighboring shores. In one of these Caesar escaped by leaping into
the sea and swimming a long distance in deep water. The Alexandrians
captured his cloak and hung it up as a trophy. He fought the last battle
against the king on the banks of the Nile, in <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 707</note> which he won a decisive victory. He
consumed nine <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0047">47</date></note> months in this strife, at the end of
which he established Cleopatra on the throne of Egypt in place of her
brother. He ascended the Nile with 400 ships, exploring the country in
company with Cleopatra and enjoying himself with her in other ways. The
details of these events are related more particularly in my Egyptian
history. Caesar could not bear to look at the head of Pompey when
it was brought to him, but ordered that it be buried, and set apart for it a
small plot of ground near the city which was dedicated to Nemesis, but in my
time, while the Roman emperor Trajan was exterminating the Jewish race in
Egypt, it was devastated by them in the exigencies of the war. </p>
</div><div n="91" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After Caesar had performed these exploits in Alexandria he hastened
by way of Syria against Pharnaces. The latter had Already accomplished many
of his aims, had seized some of the Roman countries, had fought a battle
with Caesar’s lieutenant, Domitius, and won a very brilliant
victory over him. Being much elated by this affair he had subjugated the
city of Amisus in Pontus, which adhered to the Roman interest, sold their
inhabitants into slavery, and made all their boys eunuchs. On the approach
of Caesar he became alarmed and repented of his deeds, and when
Caesar was within 200 stades he sent ambassadors to him to treat
for peace. They bore a golden crown and foolishly offered him the daughter
of Pharnaces in marriage. When Caesar learned what they were
bringing he moved forward with his army, walking in advance and chatting
with the ambassadors until he arrived at the camp of Pharnaces, when he
merely said, <q rend="double">Why should I not take instant vengeance on this parricide?</q> 
Then he sprang upon his horse and at the first shout put Pharnaces to flight
and killed a large number of the enemy, although he had with him only about
1000 of his own cavalry who had accompanied him in the advance. Here it is
said that he exclaimed, <q rend="double">O fortunate Pompey, who wast considered and named
the Great for warring against such men as these in the time of Mithridates,
the father of this man.</q> Of this battle he wrote to Rome the words, <q rend="double">I came,
I saw, I conquered.</q> </p>
</div><div n="92" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After this, Pharnaces was glad to escape to the kingdom which Pompey had
assigned to him on the Bosporus. As Caesar had no time to waste on
small matters while such great wars were still unfinished elsewhere, he
returned to the province of Asia and while passing through it transacted
public business in the cities, which were oppressed by the farmers of the
revenue, as I have shown in my Asiatic history.<note resp="translator">Our author does not mention any Asiatic history
in his preface. Photius in his enumeration of the works of Appian extant
in his time speaks of the <q rend="double">tenth book, Grecian and Ionian.</q>
Schweighäuser thinks that this is the book here referred
to.</note> Learning that a sedition had broken out in Rome and that
Antony, his master of horse, had occupied the forum with soldiers, he laid
aside everything else and hastened to the city. When he arrived there the
sedition had been quieted, but another one sprang up against himself in the
army because the promises made to them after the battle of Pharsalus had not
been kept, and because they had been held in service beyond the term fixed
by law. They demanded that they should be dismissed to their homes.
Caesar had made them certain indefinite promises at Pharsalus, and
others equally indefinite after the war in Africa should be finished. Now he
sent them a promise of 1000 drachmas more to each man. They answered him
that they did not want any more promises but all cash down. Sallustius
Crispus,<note resp="translator">This was the
historian Sallust. He was afterward appointed by Caesar
governor of Numidia. See Sec. 100 <emph>infra.</emph></note> who
had been sent to them on this business, had a narrow escape. He would have
been killed if he had not fled. When Caesar learned of this he
stationed the legion, with which Antony had been guarding the city, around
his own house and the city gates, as he apprehended attempts at plunder.
Then, notwithstanding all his friends were alarmed and cautioned him against
the fury of the soldiers, he went boldly among them while they were still
riotous in the Campus Martius, without sending word beforehand, and showed
himself on the platform. </p>
</div><div n="93" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The soldiers ran together tumultuously without arms, and, as was their
custom, saluted their commander who had suddenly appeared among them. When
he bade them tell what they wanted they were so surprised that they did not
venture to speak openly of the donative in his presence, but they adopted
the more moderate course of demanding their discharge from the service,
hoping that, since he needed soldiers for the unfinished wars, he would
speak about the donative himself. But, contrary to the expectation of all,
he replied without hesitation, <q rend="double">I discharge you.</q> Then, to their still
greater astonishment, and while the silence was most profound, he added,
 <q rend="double">And I will give you all that I have promised when I have my triumph with
others.</q> At this expression, as unexpected as it was kind to them, shame
immediately took possession of all, and reflection, together with jealousy
at the thought of their abandoning their commander in the midst of such
great wars and of others joining in the triumph instead of themselves, and
of their losing the gains of the war in Africa, which were expected to be
great, and becoming enemies of Caesar himself as well as of the
opposite party. Moved by these fears they remained still more silent and
embarrassed, hoping that Caesar would yield and change his mind on
account of his immediate necessity. But he remained silent also, until his
friends urged him to say something more to them and not leave his old
comrades of so many campaigns with a short and austere word. Then he began
to speak, addressing them first as <q rend="double">citizens,</q> not <q rend="double">fellow-soliders,</q> which
implied that they were already discharged from the army and were private
individuals. </p>
</div><div n="94" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>They could endure it no longer, but cried out that they repented of what they
had done, and besought him to keep them in his service. But Caesar
turned away and was leaving the platform when they shouted with greater
eagerness and urged him to stay and punish them for their misdeeds. He
delayed a while longer, not going away and not turning back, but pretending
to be undecided. At length he came back and said that he would not punish
any of them, but that he was grieved that even the tenth legion, to which he
had always given the first place of honor, should join in such a riot. <q rend="double">And
this legion alone,</q> he continued, <q rend="double">I will discharge from the service.
Nevertheless, when I return from Africa I will give them all that I have
promised. And when the wars are ended I will give lands to all, not as Sulla
did by taking it from the present holders and colonizing the takers among
the losers, and making them everlasting enemies to each other, but I will
give the public land, and my own, and will purchase what may be needful.</q> 
There was clapping of hands and joyful acclaim on all sides, but the tenth
legion was plunged in grief because to them alone Caesar appeared
inexorable. They begged him to choose a portion of their number by lot and
put them to death. But Caesar, seeing that there was no need of
stimulating them any further when they had repented so bitterly, became
reconciled to all, and departed straightway for the war in Africa.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="14" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XIV</head>
<head>Caesar sails for Africa — The Forces arrayed against him —
Battle of Thapsus — Cato at Utica — He commits Suicide — Juba and
Petreius kill each other</head>
<div n="95" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>He crossed from Rhegium to Messana and went to Lilybaeum.<note resp="translator">The modern Marsala, at the western
extremity of Sicily. It was the port nearest the African coast. Hirtius
says that Caesar arrived there on the 14th day before the
Calends of January and sailed eight days later.</note> Here, learning
that Cato was guarding the enemy’s magazines with a fleet and a part of the
land forces at Utica, and that he had with him 300 men who had for a long
time constituted their council of war and were called the Senate, and that
the commander, L. Scipio, and the flower of the army were at Adrumetum, he
sailed against <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 708</note>
the latter. He arrived at a time when Scipio had gone <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0046">46</date></note> away to
meet Juba, and he drew up his forces for battle near Scipio’s very camp in
order to come to an engagement with the enemy at a time when their commander
was absent. Labienus and Petreius, Scipio’s lieutenants, attacked him,
defeated him badly, and pursued him in a haughty and disdainful manner until
Labienus’ horse was wounded in the belly and threw him, and his attendants
carried him off. Petreius, thinking that he had made a thorough test of the
army and that he could conquer whenever he liked, drew off his forces,
saying to those around him, <q rend="double">Let us not deprive our general, Scipio, of the
victory.</q> In one part of the day’s work did Caesar’s luck show
itself, in that the victorious enemy seems to have abandoned the field at
the very moment of success. It is said that in the flight Caesar
dashed up to his whole line<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐγχρίμπτων ἅπασιν.</foreign> How could he
dash up to all of them at once? Mendelssohn suggests <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀποδρᾶσιν,</foreign> i.e. he dashed up to the
runaways.</note> and turned it around and seizing one of those who
carried the principal standards (the eagles) dragged him to the front.
Finally, Petreius retired and Caesar was glad to do the same. Such
was the result of Caesar’s first battle in Africa. </p>
</div><div n="96" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Not long afterward it was reported that Scipio himself was advancing with
eight legions of foot, 20,000 horse (of which most were Africans), and a
large number of light-armed troops, and thirty elephants; together with King
Juba, who had some 30,000 foot-soldiers in addition, raised for this war,
and 20,000 Numidian cavalry, besides a large number of spearmen and sixty
elephants. Caesar’s army began to be alarmed and a tumult broke out
among them on account of the disaster they had already experienced and of
the reputation of the forces advancing against them, and especially of the
numbers and bravery of the Numidian cavalry. War with elephants, to which
they were unaccustomed, also frightened them.<note resp="translator"><q rend="double">Whenever,</q> says Suetonius, <q rend="double">his (Caesar’s)
troops were dispirited by reports of the great force of the enemy, he
rallied their courage not by denying the truth of what was said or
minimizing the facts but on the contrary by exaggerating every
particular. Accordingly, when his troops were in great alarm at the
expected arrival of King Juba, he called them together and said, <q rend="single">I have
to inform you that in a very few days the king will be here with ten
legions, 30,000 horse, 100,000 light-armed foot, and 300 elephants. Let
none of you therefore presume to make any further inquiry or indulge in
conjectures, but take my word for what I tell you, which I have from
undoubted intelligence; otherwise I shall put them aboard an old crazy
vessel and leave them exposed to the mercy of the winds to be
transported to some other country.</q></q> (<title>Jul.</title> 66.)</note>
But Bocchus, another Mauritanian prince, seized Cirta, which was the capital
of Juba’s kingdom. When this news reached Juba he started for home at once
with his army, leaving thirty of his elephants only with Scipio. Thereupon
Caesar’s men plucked up courage to such a degree that the fifth
legion begged to be pitted against the elephants, and it overcame them
valiantly. From that day to the present this legion has borne the figure of
an elephant on its standards. </p>
</div><div n="97" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The battle was long, severe, and doubtful in all parts of the field until
toward evening, when victory declared itself on the side of Caesar,
who went straight on and captured Scipio’s camp and did not desist, even in
the night, from reaping the fruits of his victory until he had made a clean
sweep.<note resp="translator">This was the battle of
Thapsus. According to Hirtius Caesar’s soldiers broke away from
their officers and began the battle without. orders. (<title>Bell.
Afr.</title> 82.)</note> The enemy scattered in small bodies
wherever they could. Scipio himself with Afranius, abandoning everything,
fled by sea with twelve open ships. And thus was this army also, composed of
nearly 80,000 men who had been under long training and were inspired with
hope and courage by the previous battle, in the second engagement,
completely annihilated. And now Caesar’s fame began to be
celebrated as of a man of invincible fortune, and those who were vanquished
by him attributed nothing to his merit, but ascribed everything, including
their own blunders, to Caesar’s luck. And it seems that the result
of this war also was due to the bad generalship of the commanders who, as in
Thessaly, neglected their opportunity to wear out Caesar by delay
until his supplies were exhausted, in this foreign land, and in like manner
failed to reap the fruits of their first victory by pushing it sharply to
the end.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">συντριφθεὶς οὕτως ὀξέως διαλυθῆναι.</foreign> No commentator
has been able to explain satisfactorily the first of these four words.
Schweighäuser says that <foreign xml:lang="grc">πόλεμος</foreign> must be understood, but he adds that a <q rend="double">crushed
war</q> would be a wonderful thing. It may mean that the war, <q rend="double">crushed out
in this way, quickly came to an end.</q></note>
</p>
</div><div n="98" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As these facts became known at Utica some three days later, and as
Caesar was marching right against that place, a general flight
began. Cato did not detain anybody. He gave ships to all the nobility who
asked for them, but himself adhered firmly to his post. When the inhabitants
of Utica promised to intercede for him before doing so for themselves, he
answered with a smile that he did not need any intercessors with
Caesar, and that Caesar knew it very well. Then he placed
his seal on all the public property and gave the accounts of each kind to
the magistrates of Utica. Toward evening he bathed and dined. He ate in a
sitting posture, as had been his custom since Pompey’s death.<note resp="translator">That is, instead of reclining, as
was the fashion of the Romans at dinner. Combes-Dounous seems not to
have been aware of this custom. He says that <q rend="double">the makers of the Latin
version seem not to have known the meaning of the verb <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐγεύετο.</foreign> They have made Appian say that
Cato sat down to take his repast, as he had been accustomed to do since
Pompey’s death. Do they mean to say that before Pompey’s death Cato took
his meals <emph>standing?</emph></q> He thinks that Cato suspected
his cook. He feared poison. The passage, he thinks should be translated:
 <q rend="double">Being seated he caused the food to be tasted according to the custom
he had adopted since the death of Pompey.</q></note> He changed his habits
in no respect. He partook of the dinner, neither more nor less than usual.
He conversed with the others present concerning those who had sailed away
and inquired whether the wind was favorable and whether they would make
sufficient distance before Caesar should arrive the next morning.
Nor did he change any of his habits when he retired to rest, except that he
embraced his son rather more affectionately than usual. As he did not find
his sword in its accustomed place by his couch, he exclaimed that he had
been betrayed by his servants to the enemy. <q rend="double">What weapon shall I use if I am
attacked in the night?</q> he said.<note resp="translator">The text is dubious here.</note> When they besought him to do no
violence to himself but to go to sleep without his sword, he replied still
more plausibly, <q rend="double">Could I not strangle myself with my clothing if I wished
to, or knock my brains out against the wall, or throw myself headlong to the
ground, or destroy myself by holding my breath?</q> Much more he said to the
same purport until he persuaded them to bring back his sword. When it had
been put in its place he called for Plato’s treatise on the soul and began
to read. </p>
</div><div n="99" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When he had read the book through and when he thought that those who were
stationed at the doors were asleep, he stabbed himself under the breast. His
intestines protruded and the attendants heard a groan and rushed in.
Physicians replaced his bowels, which were still uninjured, in his body, and
after sewing up the wound put a bandage around it. When Cato came to himself
he dissembled again. Although he blamed himself for the insufficiency of the
wound, he expressed thanks to those who had saved him and said that he only
needed sleep. The attendants then retired, taking the sword with them, and
closed the door, thinking that he had become quiet. When Cato thought that
they were asleep, he tore off the bandage with his hands without making any
noise, opened the suture of the wound, enlarged it with his nails like a
wild beast, plunged his fingers into his stomach, and tore out his entrails
until he died, being then about fifty years of age. He was considered the
most steadfast of all men in upholding any opinion that he had once espoused
and in adhering to justice, rectitude, and morality, not as a matter of
custom merely, but rather from high-souled considerations. He had married
Marcia, the daughter of Philippus, when she was a virgin. He was extremely
fond of her and had had children by her. Nevertheless, he gave her to
Hortensius, one of his friends, — who desired to have children but was
married to a barren wife, — until she bore a child to him also, when Cato
took her back to his own house as though he had merely loaned her.<note resp="translator">Plutarch gives a longer account of
this affair, showing that it was attended by formalities in accord with
Roman law. Marcia’s father was consulted, but her own consent seems not
to have been needed. The criticism made upon it by Caesar in
his <title>Anti-Cato</title> was not based upon moral considerations. He
pointed to the fact that Hortensius, who was very wealthy, left his
estate to Marcia in his will, and that Cato took her back as a rich
widow, implying that it was a money—making transaction on his
part.</note> Such a man was Cato. The Uticans gave him a magnificent
funeral. Caesar said <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0047">47</date></note> that Cato had envied him the
opportunity for a deed of honor,<note resp="translator">That is, an opportunity to pardon him. According to Plutarch
Caesar said: <q rend="double">O Cato, I envy thee thy death because thou
did’st envy me my safety.</q></note> but when Cicero pronounced an encomium
on him which he styled <title>the Cato,</title> Caesar wrote an
answer to it which he called <title>the Anti-Cato.</title>
</p>
</div><div n="100" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Juba and Petreius, in view of the circumstances, perceiving no chance of
flight or safety, slew each other with swords at a banquet. Caesar
made Juba’s kingdom tributary to the Romans and appointed Sallustius Crispus
its governor. He pardoned the Uticans and the son of Cato. He captured the
daughter of Pompey together with her two children in Utica and sent them
safe to young Pompey. Of the 300 he put to death all that he found.<note resp="translator">The 300 are those mentioned in
Sec. 95 who were called the Senate. Suetonius (<title>Jul.</title> 75)
says that only three of Caesar’s enemies lost their lives,
except in battle, viz.: Afranius, Faustus Sylla, and young Lucius
Caesar, and that it was thought that even these were put to
death without Caesar’s consent.</note> Lucius Scipio, the
general-in-chief, was overtaken by a storm, and met a hostile fleet and bore
himself bravely until he was overpowered, when he stabbed himself and leaped
into the sea. This was the end of Caesar’s war in Africa.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="15" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XV</head>
<head>Caesar’s Four Triumphs — Caesar marches against Young
Pompeius in Spain — Battle of Munda — Flight and Death of Young
Pompeius</head>
<div n="101" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Caesar returned to Rome he had four triumphs together: one for
his Gallic wars, in which he had added many great nations to the Roman sway
and subdued others that had revolted; one for the Pontic war against
Pharnaces; one for the war in Africa against the African allies of L.
Scipio, in which the historian Juba (the son of King Juba), then an infant,
was led a captive. Between the Gallic and the Pontic triumphs he introduced
a kind of <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0046">46</date></note> Egyptian triumph, in which he led some captives
taken in the naval engagement on the Nile.<note resp="translator">Plutarch says that Caesar enjoyed three triumphs
at this time: <q rend="double">the Egyptian, the Pontic, and the African, not over
Scipio but probably over King Juba, whose son, still a boy, was led in
the triumph, being most fortunate in his captivity since he was thus
changed from a barbarous Numidian to one of the most learned of Greek
writers.</q></note> Although he took care not to inscribe any Roman names
in his triumph (as it would have been unseemly in his eyes and base and
inauspicious in those of the Roman people to triumph over fellow-citizens),
yet all these misfortunes were represented in the processions and the men
also by various images and pictures, all except Pompey, the only one whom he
did not venture to exhibit, since the latter was still greatly regretted by
all. The people, although restrained by fear, groaned over their domestic
ills, especially when they saw the picture of Lucius Scipio, the
general-in-chief, wounded in the breast by his own hand, casting himself
into the sea, and Petreius committing self-destruction at the banquet, and
Cato torn open by himself like a wild beast. They applauded the death of
Achillas and Pothinus, and laughed at the flight of Pharnaces. </p>
</div><div n="102" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>It is said that money to the amount of 60,500 talents [of silver] was borne
in the procession and 2822 crowns of gold weighing 20,414 pounds, from which
wealth Caesar made apportionments immediately after the triumph,
paying the army all that he had promised and more. Each soldier received
5000 Attic drachmas, each centurion double, and each tribune of infantry and
praefect of cavalry fourfold that sum. To each plebeian citizen
also was given an Attic mina. He gave also various spectacles with horses
and music, a combat of foot-soldiers, 1000 on each side, and a cavalry fight
of 200 on each side. There was also another combat of horse and foot
together. There was a combat of elephants, twenty against twenty, and a
naval engagement of 4000 oarsmen, where 1000 fighting men contended on each
side. He erected a temple to Venus, his ancestress, as he had vowed to do
when he was about to begin the battle of Pharsalus, and he laid out ground
around the temple which he intended to be a forum for the Roman people, not
for buying and selling, but a meeting-place for the transaction of public
business, like the public squares of the Persians, where the people assemble
to seek justice or to learn the laws. He placed a beautiful image of
Cleopatra by the side of the goddess, which stands there to this day. He
caused an enumeration of the people to be made, and it is said that it was
found to be only one-half of the number existing before this war.<note resp="translator">The corresponding passage in
Plutarch (<title>Life of Cœsar,</title> 55) says: <q rend="double">After the
games the census was taken and instead of the former 320,000 inhabitants
the whole number amounted to 150,000.</q> This seems incredible. A note on
this passage in Langhorne’s Plutarch says that Rualdus has not only
proved by other testimony that this is erroneous but has shown how the
error came to be made. He says that Plutarch, for want of a thorough
knowledge of Latin, was misled by a passage in Suetonius which says that
Caesar <q rend="double">made a new census (<foreign xml:lang="lat">recensum</foreign>) not in
the usual manner or place (in the Campus Martius), but street by street,
by means of the chief men of the tenement-house districts
(<foreign xml:lang="lat">insularum</foreign>), and reduced the number of those
receiving corn from the public stores from 320,000 to 150,000.</q> The
<foreign xml:lang="lat">recensus</foreign> was taken for the purpose of determining
the number of persons entitled to receive public corn. The Epitome of
Livy (CXV.) says: <q rend="double">he took a new census (<foreign xml:lang="lat">recensum</foreign>)
by which it was ascertained that the number of citizens (<foreign xml:lang="lat">civium
capita</foreign>) was 150,000,</q> meaning probably the number entitled
to receive corn.</note> To such a degree had the rivalry of these two
men reduced the city. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R.
709</note>
</p>
</div><div n="103" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Caesar, now in his fourth consulship, marched against young Pompeius
in Spain. This was all that was left of the civil war, but it was not to be
despised, for such of the nobility as had escaped from Africa had assembled
here. The army was composed of soldiers from Pharsalus and Africa itself,
who had come hither with their leaders, and of Spaniards and Celtiberians, a
strong and warlike race. There was a great number of emancipated slaves also
in Pompeius’ camp. All had been under discipline four years and were ready
to fight with desperation. Pompeius was misled by this fact and did not
postpone the battle, but engaged Caesar straightway on his arrival,
although the older ones, who had learned by experience at Pharsalus and
Africa, advised him to wear Caesar out by delay and reduce him to
want, as he was in a hostile country. Caesar made the journey from
Rome in twenty-seven days, coming with a heavily-laden army by a very long
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0045">45</date></note> route. Fear fell upon his soldiers as never
before, in consequence of the reports received of the numbers, the
discipline, and the desperate valor of the enemy. </p>
</div><div n="104" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>For this reason Caesar himself also was ready to move slowly until
Pompeius approached him at a certain place where he was reconnoitering and
accused him of cowardice. Caesar could not endure this reproach. He
drew up his forces for battle near Corduba<note resp="translator">The modern Cordova. The unknown author of the Commentaries
on Caesar’s war in Spain places this engagement on the plain of
Munda, (<foreign xml:lang="lat">in campum Mundensem</foreign>). Plutarch, Florus,
Lucan, and the Epitome of Livy say Munda. It is doubtful, however,
whether this was the Munda shown on the maps as the site of the modern
Monda. The text of the Commentaries, describing the operations following
the battle, implies that it was much nearer to Corduba than the present
Monda is to Cordova.</note> and then, too, gave <title>Venus</title> for
his watchword. Pompeius, on the other hand, gave <title>Piety</title> for
his. When battle was joined fear seized upon Caesar’s army and
hesitation was joined to fear. Caesar, lifting his hands toward
heaven, implored all the gods that his many glorious deeds be not stained by
this single disaster. He ran up and encourged his soldiers. He took his
helmet off his head and shamed them to their faces and exhorted them. As
they abated nothing of their fear he seized a shield from a soldier and said
to the officers around him, <q rend="double">This shall be the end of my life and of your
military service.</q> Then he sprang forward in advance of his line of battle
toward the enemy so far that he was only ten feet distant from them. Some
200 missiles were aimed at him, some of which he dodged while others were
caught on his shield. Then each of the tribunes ran toward him and took
position by his side, and the whole army rushed forward and fought the
entire day, advancing and retreating by turns until, toward evening,
Caesar with difficulty won the victory. It was reported that he
said that he had often fought for victory, but that this time he had fought
even for existence.<note resp="translator">Here we find
one of those parallel passages in Plutarch — parallel in language as
well as in idea — which suggest that both Plutarch and Appian drew from
a common Greek, not Latin, source. Plutarch quotes the saying of
Caesar: <foreign xml:lang="grc">πολλάκις μὲν ἀγωνίσαιτο περὶ
νίκης νῦν δὲ πρῶτον περὶ ψυχῆς</foreign> (<title>Life of
Caesar,</title> 56), which is the same as the text of
Appian, except that the latter has <foreign xml:lang="grc">καὶ</foreign>
in place of <foreign xml:lang="grc">πρῶτον.</foreign></note>
</p>
</div><div n="105" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After a great slaughter the Pompeians fled to Corduba, and Caesar,
in order to prevent the fugitives from preparing for another battle, ordered
a siege of that place. The soldiers, wearied with toil, piled the bodies and
arms of the slain together, fastened them to the earth with spears, and
encamped behind this kind of a wall. On the following day the city was
taken. Scapula, one of the Pompeian leaders, erected a funeral pile on which
he consumed himself. The heads of Varus, Labienus, and other distinguished
men were brought to Caesar.<note resp="translator">The writer of the Commentaries says that Labienus and Varus
were killed in the battle of Munda, and that their funeral obsequies
were performed where they fell.</note> Pompeius himself fled from the
scene of his defeat with 150 horsemen toward Carteia, where he had a fleet,
and entered the dockyard secretly as a private individual borne in a litter.
When he saw that the men here despaired of their safety he feared lest he
should be delivered up, and took to flight again. While going on board a
small boat his foot was caught by a rope, and a man who attempted to cut the
rope with his sword cut the sole of his foot instead. So he sailed to a
certain place for medical treatment. Being pursued thither he fled by a
rough and thorny road that aggravated his wound, until fagged out he took a
seat under a tree. Here his pursuers came upon him and he was cut down while
defending himself bravely. His head was brought to Caesar who gave
orders for its burial. Thus this war also, contrary to expectation, was
brought to an end in one battle. A younger brother of this Pompeius, also
named Pompeius but called by his first name, Sextus, collected those who
escaped from this fight; but as yet he kept moving about in concealment and
lived by robbery. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="16" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XVI</head>
<head>Unexampled Honors bestowed on Caesar — He dismisses his
Body-guard — Rumor of Caesar’s Intention to assume the Title
of King Antony crowns him at the Lupercal — Caesar plans a
Campaign against the Parthians — Conspiracy against Caesar’s
Life — Brutus and Cassius the Leaders — Other Conspirators — Brutus
prevents the Killing of Antony — Caesar comes to the Senate —
Bad Omens at the Entrance — Caesar assassinated</head>

<div n="106" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Having ended the civil wars Caesar hastened to Rome, honored and
feared as no one had ever been before. All kinds of honors were devised for
his gratification without stint, even such as were superhuman — sacrifices,
games, statues in all the temples and public places, by every tribe, by all
the provinces, and by the kings in alliance with Rome. His likeness was
painted in various forms, in some cases crowned with oak as the savior of
his country, by which crown the citizens were accustomed formerly to reward
those to whom they owed their safety. He was proclaimed the Father of his
Country and chosen dictator for life and consul for ten years, and his
person was declared sacred and inviolable. It was decreed that he should
transact business on a throne of ivory and gold; that he should perform his
sacerdotal functions always in triumphal costume; that each year the city
should celebrate the days on which he had won his victories; that every five
years the priests and Vestal virgins should offer up public prayers for his
safety; and that the magistrates immediately upon their inauguration should
take an oath not to oppose any of Caesar’s decrees. In honor of his
<foreign xml:lang="lat">gens</foreign> the name of the month Quintilis was changed to
July. Many temples were decreed to him as to a god, and one was dedicated in
common to him and the goddess Clemency, who were represented as clasping
hands. </p>
</div><div n="107" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus while they feared his power they besought his clemency. There were some
who proposed to give him the title of king, but when he learned of their
purpose he forbade it with threats, saying that it was an inauspicious name
by reason of the curse of their ancestors. He dismissed the
praetorian cohorts that had served as his bodyguard during the
wars, and showed himself with the ordinary public attendance only.<note resp="translator">Plutarch says that <q rend="double">his friends
advised him to have a body-guard and many of them offered their services
in this capacity, but he refused, saying that it was better to die once
than to be always afraid of death.</q> (<title>Life of
Cœsar,</title> 57.) Velleius records the same fact. (ii.
57.)</note> To him in this state and while he was transacting business
in front of the rostra, the Senate, preceded by the consuls, each one in his
robes of office, brought the decree awarding him the honors aforesaid. He
extended his hand to them, but did not rise when they approached nor while
they remained there, which afforded his slanderers a pretext for accusing
him of wishing to be greeted as a king. He accepted all the honors conferred
upon him except the ten-year consulship. As consuls for the ensuing year he
designated himself and Antony, his master of horse, and he appointed
Lepidus, who was then governor of Spain, but was administering it by his
friends, master of horse in place of Antony. Caesar also recalled
the exiles, except those who were banished for some very grave offence. He
pardoned his enemies and forthwith advanced many of those who had fought
against him to the yearly magistracies, or to the command of provinces and
armies. Therefore the wearied people especially hoped that he would restore
the republic to them as Sulla did after he had grasped the same power. But
in this they were disappointed.<note resp="translator">Caesar had a clear conception of facts when he said, according
to Suetonius, <q rend="double">the republic is a mere name without substance or
semblance. Sulla did not know his A B C’s (<foreign  xml:lang="lat">nescisse
litteras</foreign>) when he laid down the dictatorship.</q> 
(<title>Jul. 77.</title>)</note>
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 710</note>
</p>
</div><div n="108" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Some person among those who wished to spread the report of his desire to be
king placed a crown of laurel on his statue, bound with a white fillet. The
tribunes, Marullus and Caesetius, sought out this person and put
him in prison, pretending to gratify Caesar in this way, as he had
threatened any who should talk about making him king. Caesar was
well satisfied with their action. Some others who met him at the city gates
as he was returning from some place greeted him as king, and when the people
groaned, he said with happy readiness to those who had thus saluted him, <q rend="double">I
am no king, I am Caesar,</q> as though they had mistaken his name. The
attendants of Marullus <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C.
<date when="-0044">44</date></note> found out which man began the
shouting and ordered the officers to bring him to trial before his tribunal.
Caesar was at last vexed and accused the faction of Marullus before
the Senate of conspiring to make him odious by artfully accusing him of
aiming at royalty. He added that they were deserving of death, but that it
would be sufficient if they were deprived of their office and expelled from
the Senate. Thus he confirmed the suspicion that he desired the title, and
that he was privy to the attempts to confer it upon him, and that his
tyranny was already complete; for the cause of their punishment was their
zeal against the title of king, and, moreover, the office of tribune was
sacred and inviolable according to law and the ancient oath. By not waiting
for the expiration of their office he sharpened the public indignation. </p>
</div><div n="109" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Caesar perceived this he repented, and, reflecting that this
was the first severe and arbitrary act that he had done without military
authority and in time of peace, it is said that he ordered his friends to
protect him, since he had given his enemies the handle they were seeking
against him. But when they asked him if he would bring together again his
Spanish cohorts as a body-guard, he said, <q rend="double">There is nothing more unlucky
than perpetual watching; that is the part of one who is always afraid.</q> Nor
were the attempts to claim royal honors for him brought to an end even thus,
for, while he was in the forum looking at the games of the Lupercal, seated
on his golden chair before the rostra, Antony, his colleague in the
consulship, who was running naked and anointed, as was the priests’ custom
at that festival,<note resp="translator">At the
Lupercalia the priests of Pan (<title>Luperci</title>) ran through the
city naked, except for a goatskin tied about the loins, bearing a strap
cut from the hide of the sacrificial goat, with which they slapped
married women who placed themselves in the way. This was supposed to be
a cure for barrenness.</note> sprang upon the rostra and put a diadem on
his head. At this sight some few clapped their hands, but the greater number
groaned, and Caesar threw off the diadem. Antony again put it on
him and again Caesar threw it off. While they were thus contending
the people remained silent, being in suspense to see how it would end. When
they saw that Caesar prevailed they shouted for joy, and at the
same time applauded him because he did not accept it.<note resp="translator">Suetonius, Velleius, Plutarch, and Cicero in his
second Philippic mention this affair. Plutarch says that Antony offered
the diadem to Caesar three times. Suetonius says several times.
Velleius says that <q rend="double">he put it away, but in such a manner that he did not
seem offended.</q> The words that Shakespeare puts in the mouth of Casca in
the play of <title>Julius Cœsar</title> (Act 1, Sc. 2), were
evidently taken from Plutarch and Velleius.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="110" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>And now Caesar, either renouncing his hope, or tired out, and
wishing to avoid the plot and accusation, or giving up the city to certain
of his enemies, or to cure his bodily ailment of epilepsy and convulsions,
which came upon him suddenly and especially when he was inactive, conceived
the idea of a long campaign against the Getae and the Parthians.
The Getae, a hardy, warlike, and neigh-boring nation, were to be
attacked first. The Parthians were to be punished for their perfidy toward
Crassus. He sent across the Adriatic in advance sixteen legions of foot and
10,000 horse. And now another rumor gained currency that the Sibylline books
had predicted that the Parthians would never submit to the Romans until the
latter should be commanded by a king. For this reason some people ventured
to say that Caesar ought to be called dictator and emperor of the
Romans, as he was in fact, or whatever other name they might prefer to that
of king, and that he ought to be distinctly named king of the nations that
were subject to the Romans. Caesar declined this also, and was
wholly engaged in hastening his departure from the city in which he was
exposed to such envy. </p>
</div><div n="111" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Four days before his intended departure he was slain by his enemies in the
senate-house, either from jealousy of his fortune and power, now grown to
enormous proportions, or, as they themselves alleged, from a desire to
restore the republic of their fathers; for they well knew that if he should
conquer those nations he would be a king without a doubt.<note resp="translator">I have followed
Schweighäuser’s Latin rendering of this passage, although it is
not free from objection. The Didot version is: <q rend="double">or, as they alleged,
from a desire to restore the republic (for they knew Caesar
well), lest, if he should conquer those nations also, he should
presently become king of the Romans without a doubt.</q> Geslen considered
the passage corrupt and substituted <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἔδεισαν</foreign> (they feared) for <foreign xml:lang="grc">ᾔδεσαν</foreign> (they knew) in the text. Tollius curiously
adopted Geslen’s Latin version, but adhered to the original text.</note>
But I think that they took, as a pretext for their own design, this plan for
an additional title, which really made no difference to them except in name,
for in fact a dictator is exactly the same as a king.<note resp="translator">This is another troublesome sentence.
Schweighäuser says that the older translators dodged the
difficulty by ignoring the words <foreign xml:lang="grc">σκοπὸν</foreign>
and <foreign xml:lang="grc">προσθήκης,</foreign> for which he gives the
Latin equivalent <foreign  xml:lang="lat">propositum illius accessionis.</foreign> The
latter interpretation is followed in the Didot edition, although
Schweighäuser himself preferred the participle <foreign xml:lang="grc">σκοπῶν</foreign> (contemplating) instead of the noun
<foreign xml:lang="grc">σκοπὸν</foreign> (a plan). The Augsburg codex
reads <foreign xml:lang="grc">σκοπῶν</foreign> and this would make Appian
say: <q rend="double">I think upon reflection,</q> etc.</note> Chief among the
conspirators were two men, Marcus Brutus, surnamed Caepio (son of
the Brutus who was put to death during the Sullan revolution), who had sided
with Caesar after the disaster of Pharsalus, and Gaius Cassius, the
one who had surrendered his triremes to Caesar in the Hellespont,
both having been of Pompey’s party. Among the conspirators also was Decimus
Brutus Albinus, one of Caesar’s dearest friends. All of them had
been held in honor and trust by Caesar at all times. He had
employed them in the largest affairs. When he went to the war in Africa he
gave them the command of armies, putting Decimus Brutus in charge of
Transalpine, and Marcus Brutus of Cisalpine, Gaul. </p>
</div><div n="112" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Brutus and Cassius, who had been designated as praetors at the same
time, had a controversy with each other as to which of them should be the
city praetor, this being the place of highest honor, either because
they were really ambitious of the distinction or as a pretence so that they
might not seem to have a common understanding with each other.
Caesar, who was chosen umpire between them, is reported to have
said to his friends that justice seemed to be on the side of Cassius, but
that he must nevertheless favor Brutus. He exhibited the same affection and
preference for this man in all things. It was even thought that Brutus was
his son, as Caesar was the lover of his mother, Servilia (Cato’s
sister) at the time of his birth,<note resp="translator">Plutarch relates the following anecdote in his <title>Life of Cato
Minor</title> (24), where he describes the part taken by the latter
in the debate on the conspiracy of Catiline: <q rend="double">As we ought not to omit
even the smallest indications that show the mental image of the man, it
is said that while Caesar was engaged in a severe struggle and
controversy with Cato on this subject, and the Senate was hanging on
their words, a little tablet was brought in to Caesar. Cato
considered this a suspicious circumstance and slandered him so that some
of the senators were moved to ask that the contents be read.
Caesar handed the tablet to Cato, who was standing near. It was
an immodest letter from his own sister Servilia to Caesar, with
whom she was in love, and by whom she had been seduced. Cato, after
reading it, threw it back to Caesar, saying: <q rend="single">Keep it, you
debauchee,</q> and then went on with his speech.</q></note> for which reason,
when he won the victory at Pharsalus, it is said that he gave an immediate
order to his officers to save Brutus by all means. Whether Brutus was
ungrateful, or ignorant of his mother’s fault, or disbelieved it, or was
ashamed of it; whether he was such an ardent lover of liberty that he
preferred his country to everything, or whether it was because he was a
descendant of that Brutus of the olden time who expelled the kings, he was
aroused and shamed to this deed principally by people who secretly affixed
to the statues of the elder Brutus and also to the tribunal of Brutus
himself such writings as these, <q rend="double">Brutus, are you corrupted by bribes.</q> 
 <q rend="double">Brutus, are you dead?</q> or <q rend="double">would that you were still alive!</q> or, <q rend="double">your
posterity is unworthy of you,</q> or, <q rend="double">you are not the descendant of that
Brutus.</q> These and many like incentives fired the young man to a deed like
that of his own ancestor. </p>
</div><div n="113" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While the talk about the kingship was going on, and just before there was to
be a meeting of the Senate, Cassius met Brutus, and, seizing him by the
hand, said, <q rend="double">What shall we do in the senate-house if Caesar’s
flatterers propose a decree making him king?</q> Brutus replied that he would
not be there. Then Cassius asked him further, <q rend="double">What if we are summoned there
as praetors, what shall we do then, my good Brutus?</q> <q rend="double">I will
defend my country to the death,</q> he replied. Cassius embraced him, saying, <q rend="double">
Which of the nobility will you allow to share your thought? Do you think
that artisans and shopkeepers have written those clandestine messages on
your tribunal, or rather the noblest Romans, those who ask from the other
praetors games, horse-races, and combats of wild beasts, but from
you liberty, as a boon worthy of your ancestry?</q> Thus did they disclose to
each other what they had been privately thinking about for a long time. Each
of them tested those of their own friends, and of Caesar’s also,
whom they considered the most courageous of either faction. Of their own
friends they inveigled two brothers, Caesilius and Bucolianus, and
besides these Rubrius Ruga, Quintus Ligarius, Marcus Spurius, Servilius
Casca, Servius Galba, Sextius Naso, and Pontius Aquila. These were of their
own faction. Of Caesar’s friends they secured Decimus Brutus, whom
I have already mentioned, also Gaius Casca, Trebonius, Tillius Cimber, and
Minucius Basillus.<note resp="translator">Mention should
be made of two wise men who did not join the conspiracy. Plutarch gives
this account of them: <q rend="double">Of his other companions Brutus omitted Statilius
the Epicurean, and Favonius an adherent of Cato, because when he sounded
them in a roundabout way by conversing with them on philosophical
subjects, Favonius answered that a civil war was worse than an illegal
monarchy, and Statilius said that it was not the part of a wise man to
expose himself to danger and to stir up disorder for the sake of
worthless and foolish people.</q> (<title>Life of Brutus,</title>
12.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="114" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When they thought that they had a sufficient number, and that it would not be
wise to divulge the plot to any more, they pledged each other without oaths
or sacrifices, yet no one changed his mind or betrayed the secret. They
sought a time and place. Time was pressing because Caesar was to
depart on his campaign four days hence and would thereupon have a body-guard
of soldiers. They chose the Senate as the place, believing that, even though
the senators did not know of it beforehand, they would join heartily when
they saw the deed. It was said that this happened in the case of Romulus
when he changed from a king to a tyrant. They thought that this deed, like
that one of old, taking place in open Senate, would seem to be performed not
by private plotters, but in behalf of the country, and that, being in the
public interest, there would be no danger from Caesar’s army. At
the same time they thought the honor would be theirs because the public
would not be ignorant that they took the lead. For these reasons they
unanimously chose the Senate as the place, but they were not agreed as to
the mode. Some thought that Antony ought to be killed also because he was
consul with Caesar, and was his most powerful friend, and the one
of most repute with the army; but Brutus said that they would win the glory
of tyrannicide from the death of Caesar alone, because that would
be the killing of a king. If they should kill his friends also, the deed
would be imputed to private enmity and to the Pompeian faction. </p>
</div><div n="115" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The day before the meeting of the Senate Caesar went to sup with
Lepidus, his master of horse, taking Decimus Brutus Albinus with him to the
drinking-bout.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐς τὸν πότον.</foreign> Three of the codices read
<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐς τὸν πόντον</foreign> (to the sea) which
is absurd. Mendelssohn considers the words troublesome in either
case.</note> While they were in their cups the conversation turned on
the question, <q rend="double">What is the best kind of death for a man?</q> Various opinions
were given, but Caesar alone expressed the preference for a sudden
death. In this way he foretold his own end, and conversed about what was to
happen on the morrow. After the banquet a certain bodily faintness came over
him in the night, and his wife, Calpurnia, had a dream, in which she saw him
streaming with blood, for which reason she tried to prevent him from going
out in the morning. When he offered sacrifice there were many unfavorable
signs. He was about to send Antony to dismiss the Senate when Decimus, who
was with him, persuaded him, in order not to incur the charge of disregard
for the Senate, to go there and dismiss it himself. Accordingly he was borne
thither in a litter. Games were going on in Pompey’s theatre, and the Senate
was about to assemble in one of the adjoining buildings, as was the custom
when the games were taking place.<note resp="translator">It was customary for the magistrate who called the meeting of the
Senate to designate at the same time the place of meeting. Plutarch says
that the place where this meeting was held was a building erected by
Pompey as an addition to and ornament of his theatre, and that it
contained his own statue. This singular fact proves to Plutarch that
Caesar was led to this place by divine interposition.</note>
Brutus and Cassius were early at the portico in front of the theatre, very
calmly engaging in public business as praetors with those seeking
their services. When they heard of the bad omens at Caesar’s house
and that the Senate was to be dismissed, they were greatly disconcerted.
While they were in this state of mind a certain person took Casca by the
hand and said, <q rend="double">You kept the secret from me, although I am your friend, but
Brutus has told me all.</q> Casca was suddenly conscience-stricken and
shuddered, but his friend, smiling, continued, <q rend="double">Where shall you get the
money to stand for the aedileship?</q> Then Casca recovered himself.
While Brutus and Cassius were conferring and talking together, Popillius
Laena, one of the senators, drew them aside and said that he joined
them in his prayers<note resp="translator">Here again
there is a close resemblance in words between Plutarch and Appian, but
the former uses the direct discourse <foreign xml:lang="grc">συνεύχομαι</foreign> and the latter the indirect <foreign xml:lang="grc">συνεύχεσθαι.</foreign></note> for what they had in
mind, and he urged them to make haste. They were confounded, but remained
silent from terror. </p>
</div><div n="116" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While Caesar was being borne to the Senate one of his intimates, who
had learned of the conspiracy, ran to his house to tell what he knew. When
he arrived there and found only Calpurnia he merely said that he wanted to
speak to Caesar about urgent business, and then waited for him to
come back from the Senate, because he did not know all the particulars of
the affair. Meantime Artemidorus, whose hospitality Caesar had
enjoyed at Cnidus, ran to the Senate and found him already murdered. A
tablet informing him of the conspiracy was put into Caesar’s hand
by another person while he was sacrificing in front of the curia, but he
went in immediately and it was found in his hand after his death. Directly
after he stepped out of the litter Popillius Laena, who a little
before had joined his prayers with the party of Cassius, accosted
Caesar and engaged him aside in earnest conversation. The sight of
this proceeding and especially the length of the conversation struck terror
into the hearts of the conspirators, and they made signs to each other that
they would kill themselves rather than be captured. As the conversation was
prolonged they saw that Laena did not seem to be revealing anything
to Caesar, but rather to be urging some petition. They recovered
themselves and when they saw him return thanks to Caesar after the
conversation they took new courage. It was the custom of the magistrates,
when about to enter the Senate, to take the auspices at the entrance. Here
again Caesar’s first victim was without a heart, or, as some say,
the beginning of the entrails was wanting. A soothsayer said that this was a
sign of death. Caesar, laughing, said that the same thing had
happened to him when he was beginning his campaign against Pompeius in
Spain. The soothsayer replied that he had been in very great danger then and
that now the omen was still more entitled to credence.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἔτι
πιθανώτερον</foreign>: here we encounter a curiosity in the text.
In Sec. 153 <emph>infra</emph> the author says: <q rend="double">As
Caesar was entering the Senate for the last time, as I have
shortly before related, the same omens were observed, but he said
jestingly that the same thing happened to him in Spain. The soothsayer replied that he was in danger then and that the omen was now <emph>more deadly,</emph> <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπιθανατώτερον.</foreign></q> The close resemblance
of the text of the two phrases suggested to Musgrave the query whether
Appian had not written the same in both places. Schweighäuser
thought that it was altogether probable, but as all the codices agreed
he did not venture to change the text. Mendelssohn has changed it in the
Teubner edition, while the Didot edition adheres to the original.</note>
So Caesar ordered him to sacrifice again. None of the victims were
more propitious; but being ashamed to keep the Senate waiting, and being
urged by his enemies in the guise of friends, he went in disregarding the
omens. For it was fated that Caesar should meet his doom. </p>
</div><div n="117" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The conspirators had left Trebonius, one of their number, to engage Antony in
conversation at the door. The others, with concealed daggers, stood around
Caesar like friends as he sat in his chair. Then one of them,
Tillius Cimber, came up in front of him and petitioned him for the recall of
his brother, who had been banished. When Caesar answered that the
matter must be deferred, Cimber seized hold of his purple robe as though
still urging his petition, and pulled it away so as to expose his neck,
exclaiming, <q rend="double">Friends, what are you waiting for?</q> Then first Casca, who was
standing over Caesar’s head, drove his dagger at his throat, but
missed his aim and wounded him in the breast. Caesar snatched his
toga from Cimber, seized Casca’s hand, sprang from his chair, turned around,
and hurled Casca with great violence. While he was in this position another
one stabbed him with a dagger in the side, which was exposed by his turning
around,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ὡς ἐπὶ συστροφῇ τεταμένον.</foreign> Literally, <q rend="double">which was in
a state of tension by reason of his turning and twisting.</q></note>
Cassius wounded him in the face, Brutus smote him in the thigh, and
Bucolianus between the shoulder-blades. With rage and outcries
Caesar turned now upon one and now upon another like a wild animal,
but after receiving the wound from Brutus he despaired and, veiling himself
with his robe, he fell in a decent position at the foot of Pompey’s statue.
They continued their attack after he had fallen until he had received
twenty-three wounds. Several of them while thrusting with their swords
wounded each other.<note resp="translator">The account
of the assassination given by Suetonius (<title>Jul.</title> 82) is as
follows: <q rend="double">The conspirators stood around him as he was seated, pretending
to pay their respects, and directly Tillius Cimber, who had assumed the
initiative, advanced nearer as if to ask some favor, and when
Caesar made a motion with his head to signify that the matter
must be deferred he seized his toga at both shoulders. Caesar
exclaimed <q rend="single">this is violence,</q> and then another of Casca’s party wounded
him in the back a little below the neck. Caesar seized Casca’s
arm and pierced it with a stylus, and while trying to rush forward was
hindered by another wound. When he saw himself assailed on all sides
with drawn daggers he drew his toga around his head and at the same time
with his left hand arranged the fold over his lower limbs so that he
might fall more decently, with the lower part of his body covered. In
this way he was stabbed with twenty-three wounds, having uttered no cry
but only a single groan at the first blow, although some say that when
Marcus Brutus attacked him he exclaimed <foreign xml:lang="grc">καὶ σὺ
τέκνον,</foreign> (and you, my son). He lay there dead for some
time, all having fled, until three of his slaves placed him on a litter
with his arm hanging down, and carried him home. Among so many wounds,
according to the physician Antistius, there was only one that was
mortal, and that was the second one, which he had received in the
breast.</q></note></p>
</div></div>
 <div n="17" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XVII</head>
<head>Panic in the City — The Murderers take possession of the Capitol —
Rottenness of Roman Society — The Conspirators distribute Bribes —
Brutus and Cassius come down from the Capitol — Proposals for
Compromise to Antony — Antony’s Answer</head>
<div n="118" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the murderers had perpetrated their crime, in a sacred place, on one
whose person was sacred and inviolable,<note resp="translator">Caesar’s person was sacred and inviolable under
Roman law both as pontifex maximus and as dictator.</note> there was an
immediate flight from the curia and throughout the whole city. Some senators
were wounded in the tumult and others killed. Many other citizens and
strangers were murdered also, not designedly, but as such things happen in
public commotions, by the mistakes of <figure>
<head>JULIUS CAeSAR AS PONTIFEX MAXIMUS</head>
<figDesc>In the Vatican Museum, Rome</figDesc>
</figure>
</p>
<p>those into whose hands they fell. Gladiators, who had been armed early in the
morning for that day’s spectacles, ran out of the theatre into the balcony
of the Senate. The theatre itself was emptied in haste and panic-terror, and
the markets were plundered. All citizens closed their front doors and put
themselves in a posture of defence on their roofs. Antony fortified his
house, apprehending that the conspiracy was against him as well as
Caesar. Lepidus, the master of horse, being in the forum at the
time, learned what had been done and ran to the island in the river where he
had a legion of soldiers, which he transferred to the plain in order to be
in greater readiness to execute Antony’s orders; for he yielded to Antony as
a closer friend of Caesar and also as consul. While pondering over
the matter they were strongly moved to avenge the death of Caesar,
but they feared lest the Senate should espouse the side of the murderers and
so they concluded to await events. There had been no military guard around
Caesar, for he did not like guards except the usual attendants of
the magistracy. Many civilian officers and a large crowd of citizens and
strangers, of slaves and freedmen, had accompanied him from his house to the
Senate, but had fled <emph>en masse,</emph> all except three slaves,
who placed the body in a litter and, with uneven step (being an uneven
number), bore him homeward who, a little before, had been master of the
earth and sea. </p>
</div><div n="119" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The murderers wished to make a speech in the Senate, but as nobody remained
there they wrapped their togas around their left arms to serve as shields,
and, with swords still reeking with blood, ran, crying out that they had
slain a king and tyrant. One of them bore a cap on the end of a spear as a
symbol of freedom and exhorted the people to restore the government of their
fathers and recall the memory of the elder Brutus and of those who took the
oath together against the ancient kings. With them ran some with drawn
swords who had not participated in the deed, but wanted to share the glory,
among whom were Lentulus Spinther, Favonius, Aquinus, Dolabella, Murcus, and
Patiscus. These did not share the glory, but they suffered punishment with
the guilty. As the people did not flock to them they were disconcerted and
alarmed. Although the Senate had at first fled through ignorance and alarm,
they had confidence in it nevertheless as being their own relatives and
friends, and oppressed equally with themselves by the tyranny. They had
apprehensions of the plebeians and of Caesar’s soldiers, many of
whom were then present in the city, some lately dismissed from the service
and to whom lands had been allotted; others who had been already settled,
but had come in to serve as an escort for Caesar on his departure
from the city. The assassins had fears of Lepidus, too, and of the army
under him in the city, and also of Antony in his character as consul, lest
he should consult the people alone, instead of the Senate, and bring some
fearful punishment upon them. </p>
</div><div n="120" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In this frame of mind they hastened up to the Capitol with their gladiators.
There they took counsel and decided to bribe the populace, hoping that if
some would begin to praise the deed others would join in from love of
liberty and longing for the republic. They thought that the Roman people
were still exactly the same as they had heard that they were at the time
when the elder Brutus expelled the kings. They did not perceive that they
were counting on two incompatible things, namely, that people could be
lovers of liberty and bribe-takers at the same time. The latter class were
much easier to find of the two, because the government had been corrupt for
a long time. The plebeians were now much mixed with foreign blood, freedmen
had equal rights of citizenship with them, and slaves were dressed in the
same fashion as their masters. Except in the case of the senatorial rank the
same costume was common to slaves and to free citizens. Moreover the
distribution of corn to the poor, which took place in Rome only, drew
thither the lazy, the beggars, the vagrants of all Italy. The multitude of
discharged soldiers no longer returned one by one to their native places as
formerly, fearing that some of them might be accused of having engaged in
iniquitous wars,<note resp="translator">The text here is
very obscure.</note> but were sent in groups to unjust allotments of
lands and houses belonging to others. These were now encamped in temples and
sacred enclosures under one standard, and one person appointed to lead them
to their colony, and as they had already sold their own be longings
preparatory to their departure they were in readiness to be bought for any
purpose.<note resp="translator">This is a very
strong picture of the corruption of Roman society at that time and of
its incapacity for self-government.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="121" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>From so many men of this kind a considerable crowd was drawn speedily and
without difficulty to the party of Cassius in the forum. These, although
bought, did not dare to praise the murder, because they feared
Caesar’s reputation and doubted what course the rest of the people
might take. So they shouted for peace as being for the public advantage, and
with one accord recommended this policy to the magistrates, intending by
this device to secure the safety of the murderers;<note resp="translator">The text of all the codices except the Vatican
reads: <foreign xml:lang="grc">παρεκάλουν</foreign> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">τέχνασμα τοῦτό ἐστι τῶν ἀνδροφονῶν</foreign>)
<foreign xml:lang="grc">σοτηρίαν ἐπινοοῦντες;</foreign> which means
that this shouting for peace <q rend="double">was a device of the murderers themselves.</q> 
which is not unlikely, but it presents grammatical difficulties which
led Schweighäuser to change the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐστι</foreign> to <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐς τὴν</foreign> and to
reject the parenthesis, as Geslen had done before him. The Vatican codex
has this very reading, as Mendelssohn points out.</note> for there could
be no peace without amnesty to them. While they were thus engaged the
praetor Cinna, a relative of Caesar by marriage, made his
appearance, advanced unexpectedly into the middle of the forum, laid aside
his praetorian robe, as if disdaining the gift of a tyrant, and
called Caesar a tyrant and his murderers tyrannicides. He extolled
their deed as exactly like that of their ancestors, and ordered that the men
themselves should be called from the Capitol as benefactors and rewarded
with public honors. So spake Cinna, but when the hirelings saw that the
unbought portion of the crowd did not agree with them they did not call for
the men in the Capitol, nor did they do anything else but continually demand
peace. </p>
</div><div n="122" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>But after Dolabella,<note resp="translator">Dolabella had
married Cicero’s daughter Tullia. He was a great scoundrel and
turncoat.</note> a young man of noble family who had been chosen by
Caesar as consul for the remainder of his own year when he was
about to leave the city, and who had put on the consular garb and taken the
other insignia of the office, came forward next and railed against the man
who had advanced him to this dignity and pretended to have been privy to the
conspiracy against him, and that his hand alone was unwillingly absent —
some say that he even proposed a decree that this day should be consecrated
as the birthday of the republic — then the hirelings took new courage,
seeing that they had both a praetor and a consul on their side, and
demanded that Cassius and his friends be summoned from the Capitol. They
were delighted with Dolabella and thought that now they had a young
optimate, who was also consul, to oppose against Antony. Only Cassius and
Marcus Brutus came down, the latter with his hand still bleeding from the
wound he had received when he and Cassius were dealing blows at
Caesar. When they reached the forum neither of them said anything
which betokened humility. On the contrary they praised each other as for
something confessedly admirable. They considered the city fortunate and bore
special testimony to the merits of Decimus Brutus because he had furnished
them gladiators at a critical moment. They exhorted the people to be like
their ancestors, who had expelled the kings, although the latter were
exercising the government not by violence like Caesar, but had been
chosen according to law. They advised the recall of Sextus Pompey (the son
of Pompey the Great, the defender of the republic against Caesar),
who was still warring against Caesar’s lieutenants in Spain. They
also recommended that the tribunes, Caesetius and Marullus, who had
been deposed by Caesar, should be recalled from exile. </p>
</div><div n="123" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After they had thus spoken Cassius and Brutus returned directly to the
Capitol, because they had not yet entire confidence in the present posture
of affairs. Having first enabled their friends and relatives to come to them
in the temple, they chose from among them messengers to treat on their
behalf with Lepidus and Antony for conciliation and the preservation of
liberty, and for warding off the evils that would befall the country if they
should not come to an agreement. This the messengers asked, not extolling
the deed that had been done, however, for they did not dare to do this in
the presence of Caesar’s friends. They asked that it be tolerated
now that it was done, out of pity for the perpetrators (who had been
actuated, not by hatred toward Caesar, but by love of country), and
out of compassion for the city exhausted by long-continued civil strife, and
which a new sedition might deprive of the good men still remaining.
 <q rend="double"><hi rend="ital">If</hi> enmity were entertained against certain persons,</q> they
said, <q rend="double">it would be an act of impiety to gratify it in a time of public
danger. It would be far preferable to sink private animosity in the public
weal, or, if anybody were irreconcilable, at least to postpone his private
grievances for the present.</q> </p>
</div><div n="124" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Antony and Lepidus wished to avenge Caesar, as I have already said,
either on the score of friendship, or of the oaths they had sworn, or
because they were aiming at the supreme power themselves and thought that
their course would be easier if so many men of such rank were put out of the
way at once. But they feared the friends and relatives of these men and the
leaning of the rest of the Senate toward them, and especially they feared
Decimus Brutus, who had been chosen by Caesar governor of Cisalpine
Gaul, which had a large army. So they decided to watch a future opportunity
and to try if possible to draw over to themselves the army of Decimus, which
was already disheartened by its protracted labors. Having come to this
decision, Antony replied to the messengers, <q rend="double">We shall do nothing from
private enmity, yet in consequence of the crime and of the oaths we have all
sworn to Caesar, that we would either protect his person or avenge
his death, a solemn regard for our oath requires us to drive out the guilty
and to live with a smaller number of innocent men rather than that all
should be liable to the divine curse. Yet for our own part, although this
seems to us the proper course, we will consider the matter with you in the
Senate and we will agree to whatever may be decided in common to be
propitious for the city.</q> </p>
</div><div n="125" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus did Antony make a safe answer. The messengers returned their thanks and
went away full of hope, for they had entire confidence that the Senate would
cooperate with them. Antony ordered the magistrates to have the city watched
by night, stationing guards at intervals as in the daytime, and he had fires
lighted throughout the city. By this means the friends of the murderers were
enabled to traverse the city the whole night, going to the houses of the
senators and beseeching them in behalf of these men and of the republic. On
the other hand, the leaders of the colonized soldiers ran about uttering
threats lest they should fail to hold the lands set apart, either already
assigned or proclaimed to them. And now the more honest citizens began to
recover courage when they learned how small was the number of the
conspirators, and when they remembered Caesar’s merits they became
much divided in opinion. That same night Caesar’s money and his
official papers were transferred to Antony’s house, either because Calpurnia
thought that they would be safer there or because Antony ordered it.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="18" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XVIII</head>
<head>Antony summons the Senate — Debate on the Killing of Caesar —
Antony cunningly proposes a Self-denying Ordinance — It is rejected —
A Speech by Lepidus — Antony addresses the Senate — The Senate votes
Amnesty to the Murderers and Confirmation of Caesar’s Acts</head>
<div n="126" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While these things were taking place Antony, by means of a notice sent around
by night, called the Senate to meet before daybreak at the temple of Tellus,
which was very near his own house, because he did not dare to go to the
senate-house situated just below the Capitol, where the gladiators were
aiding the conspirators, nor did he wish to disturb the city by bringing in
the army. Lepidus, however, did that. As daylight was approaching the
senators assembled at the temple of Tellus, including the praetor
Cinna, clothed again in the robe of office which he had cast off the
previous day as the gift of a tyrant. Some of the unbribed people and some
of Caesar’s veterans, when they saw him, were indignant that he,
although a relative of Caesar, should have been the first to
slander him in a public speech, threw stones at him, pursued him, and when
he had taken refuge in a house brought fagots and were about to set it on
fire when Lepidus came up with his soldiers and stopped them. This was the
first decided expression of opinion in favor of Caesar. The
hirelings, and the murderers themselves, were alarmed by it. </p>
</div><div n="127" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In the Senate only a small number were free from sympathy with the act of
violence and indignant at the murder. Most of them sought to aid the
murderers in various ways. They proposed first to invite them to be present
under a pledge of safety and sit in council with them, thus changing them
from criminals to judges. Antony did not oppose this because he knew they
would not come; and they did not come. Then, in order to test the feeling of
the Senate, some of them extolled the deed openly and without disguise,
called the men tyrannicides, and proposed that they should be rewarded.
Others were opposed to giving rewards, saying that the men did not want them
and had not done the deed for the sake of reward, but thought that they
should merely be thanked as public benefactors. Still others were opposed to
thanking them and thought that it would be sufficient to grant them
impunity. Such were the devices to which they resorted, and were trying to
discover which of these courses the Senate would be inclined to accept
first, hoping that after a little that body would be more easily led on by
them to the other measures. The honester portion revolted at the murder as
impious, but out of respect for the great families of the murderers would
not oppose the granting of impunity, yet they were indignant at the proposal
to honor them as public benefactors. Others argued that if impunity were
granted it would not be fitting to refuse the most ample means of safety.
When one speaker said that honoring them would be dishonoring
Caesar, it was answered that it was not permissible to prefer the
interests of the dead to those of the living. Another having said plainly
that one of two things must be decided beforehand — either that
Caesar was a tyrant or that his murderers were to be pardoned as an
act of clemency — the others [Caesar’s enemies] seized upon this
simple proposition and asked that an opportunity be given them of expressing
themselves by vote concerning the character of Caesar, under the
solemn pledge that, if they voluntarily should give their unbiased judgment,
the penalty of the oath should not befall them for having previously voted
Caesar’s decrees under compulsion — never willingly and never
until they were in fear for their own lives, after the killing of Pompey and
of numberless others besides Pompey. </p>
</div><div n="128" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Antony, who had been looking on and waiting, saw that sufficient
material for discussion had been introduced which was not open to dispute,
he resolved to balk their scheme by exciting fear and anxiety for
themselves. Seeing a great number of these senators themselves who had been
designated by Caesar for city magistracies, priestly offices, and
the command of provinces and armies (for, as he was going on a long
expedition, he had appointed them for five years), Antony proclaimed silence
as consul and said: <q rend="double">Those who are asking for a vote on the character of
Caesar ought to consider in the first place that all the things
done and decreed under his government and while he was the chosen ruler of
the state remain in full force. If it is decided that he usurped the
government by violence, his body should be cast out unburied and all his
acts annulled. These acts, to speak briefly, embrace the whole earth and
sea, and most of them will stand whether we like them or not, as I shall
presently show. Those things which alone belong to us to decide, because
they concern us alone, I will propose to you first, so that you may gain a
conception of the more difficult questions from a consideration of the
easier ones. Almost all of us have held office under Caesar; or do
so still, having been chosen thereto by him; or will do so soon, having been
designated in advance by him; for, as you know, he had disposed of the city
offices, the yearly magistracies, and the command of provinces and armies
for five years. If you are willing to resign these offices (for this is
entirely in your power), I will put that question to you first and then I
will take up the remaining ones.</q> </p>
</div><div n="129" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Having lighted this kind of a firebrand among them, not in reference to
Caesar, but to themselves, Antony relapsed into silence. They rose
immediately <emph>en masse,</emph> and with loud clamor protested
against new elections or submitting their claims to the people. They
preferred to keep a firm hold on what they possessed. Some were opposed to
new elections because they were not of lawful age, or for some other
unavowed reason, and among these was the consul Dolabella himself, who could
not legally stand for an election to that office as he was only twenty-five
years old. Although he had pretended yesterday that he had a share in the
conspiracy, a sudden change came over him, and now he reviled the majority
for seeking to confer honor on murderers and dishonoring their own
magistrates under the pretext of securing the safety of the former. Some
encouraged Dolabella himself and the other magistrates to believe that they
would obtain for them the same positions from the people’s gratitude without
any change of officers, but simply by the more legal method of election in
place of monarchical appointment, and that it would be an additional honor
to them to hold the same places under the monarchy and the republic. While
these speakers were still talking some of the praetors, in order to
ensnare the opposing faction, laid aside their robes of office as if they
were about to exchange them for a more legal title to their places, in
common with the others; but the others did not fall into the trap. They knew
that these men could not control the future election. </p>
</div><div n="130" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While affairs were proceeding thus, Antony and Lepidus went out of the
Senate, having been called for by a crowd that had been assembling for some
time. When they were perceived in an elevated place, and the shouters had
been with difficulty silenced, one of their number, either of his own
volition or because he was prompted, called out, <q rend="double">Have a care lest you
suffer a like fate.</q> Antony loosened his tunic and showed him a coat-of-mail
inside, thus exciting the beholders, as though it were impossible even for
consuls to be safe without arms. Some cried out that the deed must be
avenged, but a greater number demanded peace. To those who called for peace
Antony said, <q rend="double">That is what we are striving for, that it may come and be
permanent, but it is hard to get security for it when so many oaths and
solemnities were of no avail in the case of Caesar.</q> Then, turning
to those who demanded vengeance, he praised them as more observant of the
obligations of oaths and religion, and added, <q rend="double">I myself would join you and
would be the first to call for vengeance if I were not the consul, who must
care for what is called expedient rather than for what is just. So these
people who are inside tell us. So Caesar himself perhaps thought
when, for the good of the country, he spared those citizens whom he captured
in war, and was slain by them.</q> </p>
</div><div n="131" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Antony had in this way worked upon both parties by turns, those who
wanted to have vengeance on the murderers asked Lepidus to execute it. As
Lepidus was about to speak those who were standing at a distance asked him
to go down to the forum where all could hear him equally well. So he went
directly there, thinking that the crowd was now changing its mind, and when
he had taken his place on the rostra he groaned and wept in plain sight for
some time. Then recovering himself, he said, <q rend="double">Yesterday I stood with
Caesar here, where now I am com- pelled to ask what you wish me to
do about his murder.</q> Many cried out <q rend="double">Avenge Caesar.</q> The hirelings
shouted on the other side, <q rend="double">Peace for the republic.</q> To the latter he
replied, <q rend="double">Agreed, but what kind of a peace do you mean? By what sort of
oaths shall it be confirmed? We all swore the national oaths to
Caesar and we have trampled on them — we who are considered the
most distinguished of the oath-takers.</q> Then, turning to those who called
for vengeance, he said, <q rend="double">Caesar, that truly sacred and revered man,
has gone from us, but we hesitate to deprive the republic of those who still
remain. Our conscript fathers,</q> he added, <q rend="double">are considering these matters,
and this is the opinion of most of them.</q> They shouted again, <q rend="double">Avenge him
yourself.</q> <q rend="double">I would like to,</q> he replied, <q rend="double">and it is right that I should do
it even alone, but it is not fitting that you and I should wish to do it
alone, or alone set ourselves up against them.</q> </p>
</div><div n="132" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While Lepidus was employing such devices the hirelings, who knew that he was
ambitious, praised him and offered him Caesar’s place as pontifex
maximus. He was delighted. <q rend="double">Mention this to me later,</q> he said, <q rend="double">if you
consider me worthy of it,</q> whereupon the mercenaries, encouraged by their
offer of the priesthood, insisted still more strongly on peace. <q rend="double">Although it
is contrary to religion and law,</q> he said, <q rend="double">I will do what you wish.</q> So
saying he returned to the Senate, where Dolabella had consumed all the
intervening time in unseemly talk about his own office. Antony, who was
waiting to see what the people would do, looked at Dolabella with derision,
for the two were at variance with each other. After enjoying the spectacle
sufficiently and perceiving that the people would not do anything rashly, he
decided, under compulsion, to extend protection to the murderers (concealing
the necessity, however, and pretending to act in this way as a matter of the
greatest favor), and at the same time to have Caesar’s acts
ratified and his plans carried into effect by common agreement. Accordingly
he commanded silence again and spoke as follows:— </p>
</div><div n="133" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double">Fellow-citizens, while you have been considering the case of the offenders I
have not joined in the debate. When you called for a vote on Caesar
instead of on them, I had brought forward, until this moment, only one of
Caesar’s acts. This one threw you into these many present
controversies, and not without reason, for if we resign our offices we shall
confess that we (so many and of such high rank as we are) came by them
undeservedly. Consider the matters that cannot be easily controlled by us.
Reckon them up by cities and provinces, by kings and princes. Almost all of
these, from the rising to the setting sun, Caesar either subdued
for us by force and arms, or organized by his laws, or confirmed in their
allegiance by his favors and kindness. Which of these powers do you think
will consent to be deprived of what they have received, unless you mean to
fill the world with new wars — you who propose to spare these wretches for
the sake of your exhausted country? But, omitting the more distant dangers
and apprehensions, we have others not only near at hand, but even of our own
household throughout Italy itself,— men who are here after receiving the
rewards of victory, many of them with arms in their hands and in the same
organization in which they fought, men assigned to colonies by
Caesar (many thousands of whom are still in the city), — what
think you they will do if they are deprived of what they have received, or
expect to receive, in town and country? The past night showed you a sample.
They were coursing the streets with threats against you who were
supplicating in behalf of the murderers.</q> </p>
</div><div n="134" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">Think you that Caesar’s fellow-soldiers will allow his body to be
dragged through the streets, dishonored, and cast away unburied — for our
laws prescribe such treatment for tyrants? Will they consider the rewards
they have received for their victories in Gaul and Britain secure, when he
who gave them is treated with contumely? What will the Roman people
themselves do? What the Italians? What ill-will of gods and men will attend
you if you put ignominy upon one who advanced your dominion to shores of the
ocean hitherto unknown? Will not such fickleness on our part be held in
greater reprobation and condemnation if we vote to confer honor on those who
have slain a consul in the senate-house, an inviolable man in a sacred
place, in full senate, under the eyes of the gods, and if we dishonor one
whom even our enemies honor for his bravery? I warn you to abstain from
these proceedings as being sacrilegious in themselves and not in our power.
I move that all the acts and intentions of Caesar be ratified and
that the authors of the crime be by no means applauded (for that would be
neither pious, nor just, nor consistent with the ratification of
Caesar’s acts). Let them be spared, if you please, as an act of
clemency only, for the sake of their families and friends, if the latter
will accept it in this sense in behalf of the murderers and acknowledge it
in the light of a favor.</q> </p>
</div><div n="135" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Antony had said these things with intense feeling and impetuosity, all
the others remaining silent and agreeing, the following decree was passed:
 <q rend="double">There shall be no prosecution for the murder of Caesar, but all of
his acts and decrees are confirmed, because this policy is deemed
advantageous to the commonwealth.</q> The friends of the murderers insisted
that those last words should be added for their security, implying that
Caesar’s acts were confirmed as a measure of utility and not of
justice; and in this matter Antony yielded to them. When this decree had
been voted the leaders of the colonists who were present asked for another
act special to themselves, in addition to the general one, in order to
confirm their colonies. Antony did not oppose this, but rather intimidated
the Senate to pass it. So this was adopted, and another like it concerning
the colonists who had been already sent out. The Senate was thereupon
dismissed, and a number of senators collected around Lucius Piso, whom
Caesar had made the custodian of his will<note resp="translator">Suetonius says that Caesar deposited his
will with the eldest of the Vestal virgins. His account is as follows:
 <q rend="double">At the instance of Lucius Piso, his father-in-law, Caesar’s
will was opened and read in the house of Antony, which will he had made
on the preceding ides of September, in his Lavican villa, and had
deposited with the eldest of the Vestal virgins. Quintus Tubero relates
that Pompey had been constantly made his heir in the wills written by
him from his first consulship to the beginning of the civil war, and
that this fact was publicly made known to the army. In his latest will
he made the three grandsons of his sisters his heirs, giving to Gaius
Octavius three-fourths and to Lucius Pinarius and Quintus Pedius the
remaining fourth.</q> (<title>Jul.</title> 83.) The epitome of Livy (cxvi.)
says that the will gave Octavius one-half.</note> and urged him not to
make the will public, and not to give the body a public funeral, lest some
new disturbance should arise therefrom. As he would not yield they
threatened him with a public prosecution for defrauding the people of such
an amount of wealth which ought to go into the public treasury; thus giving
new signs that they were suspicious of a tyranny.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="19" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XIX</head>
<head>Piso calls for the Reading of Caesar’s Will — Brutus addresses
the People — His Speech applauded</head>
<div n="136" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Then Piso called out with a loud voice and demanded that the consuls should
reconvene the senators, who were still present, which was done, and then he
said: <q rend="double">These men who talk of having killed a tyrant are already so many
tyrants over us in place of one. They forbid the burying of a Pontifex
Maximus and they threaten me when I produce his will. Moreover, they intend
to confiscate his property as that of a tyrant. They have ratified
Caesar’s acts as regards themselves, but they annul those which
relate to him. It is no longer Brutus or Cassius who do this, but those who
instigated them to the murder.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀλλ’ οἱ κἀκείνους ἐς τόνδε τὸν
ὄλεθρον ἐκριπίσαντες.</foreign> Combes-Dounous translates these
words: <q rend="double">Those who have hurled Brutus and Cassius into the abyss,</q> an
error due perhaps to a hasty reading of the last word and deriving it
from <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐκρίπτω,</foreign> to cast away, instead of
<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐκριπίζω,</foreign> to instigate.</note> Of
his burial you are the masters. Of his will I am, and never will I betray
what has been intrusted to me unless somebody kills me also.</q> This speech
excited clamor and indignation on all sides, and especially among those who
hoped that they should obtain something from the will. It was decreed that
the will should be read in public and that Caesar should have a
public funeral. Thereupon the Senate adjourned. </p>
</div><div n="137" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Brutus and Cassius learned what had been done they sent messengers to
the plebeians, whom they invited to come up to them at the Capitol.
Presently a large number came together and Brutus addressed them as follows:
<q rend="double">Here, citizens, we meet you, we who yesterday met together with you in the
forum. We have come hither, not as taking refuge in a sanctuary (for we have
done nothing wrong), nor in a citadel (for as regards our own affairs we
intrust ourselves to you), but the sudden and unexpected attack made upon
Cinna compelled us to do so. I know that our enemies accuse us of perjury
and say that we render a lasting peace difficult. What we have to reply to
these accusations we will say in your presence, citizens, with whose help we
shall do what remains to be done for the restoration of democratic
government. After Gaius Caesar advanced from Gaul with hostile arms
against his country, and Pompey, the most popular man among you, suffered as
he did, and after him a great number of other good citizens, who had been
driven into Africa and Spain, had perished, Caesar was naturally
apprehensive, although his power was firmly intrenched, and we granted him
amnesty at his request and confirmed it by oath. If he had required us to
swear not only to condone the past, but to be willing slaves for the future,
what would our present accusers have done? For my part I think that, being
Romans, they would have chosen to die many times rather than take an oath of
voluntary servitude.</q> </p>
</div><div n="138" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double">If Caesar did no more against your liberty then are we perjured.
But if he restored to you neither the magistracies of the city nor those of
the provinces, neither the command of armies, the priestly offices, the
leadership of colonies, nor any other posts of honor; if he neither
consulted the Senate about anything nor asked the authority of the people,
but if Caesar’s command was all in all; if he was not even ever
satiated with our misfortunes as Sulla was (for Sulla, when he had destroyed
his enemies restored to you the government of the commonwealth, but
Caesar, as he was going away for another long military expedition,
anticipated by his appointments your elections for five years), what sort of
freedom was this in which not a ray of hope could be any longer discerned?
What shall I say of the defenders of the people, Caesetius and
Marullus? Were not the incumbents of a sacred and inviolable office
ignominiously banished? Although the law and the oath prescribed by our
ancestors forbid calling the tribunes to account during their term of
office, Caesar banished them even without a trial. Have
<emph>we</emph> then, or has <emph>he,</emph> done violence
to inviolable persons — unless you say that Caesar was sacred and
inviolable, upon whom we conferred that distinction not of our own free
will, but by compulsion, and not until he had invaded his country with arms
and killed a great number of our noblest and best citizens? Did not our
fathers in a democracy and without compulsion take an oath that the office
of tribune should be sacred and inviolable, and declare with maledictions
that it should remain so forever? What has become of the public tribute?
What of the public accounts? Who opened the public treasury without our
consent? Who removed part of the consecrated money? Who threatened with
death another tribune who opposed him?</q> </p>
</div><div n="139" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double"><q rend="single">But what kind of an oath after this will be a guarantee of peace?</q> they
ask. If there is no tyrant there will be no need of oaths. Our fathers never
needed any. If anybody else seeks to establish tyranny, no faith, no oath,
will ever bind Romans to the tyrant. This we said before, while we were
still in danger; this we will continue to say forever for our country’s
sake. We, who held places of honor securely at the hands of Caesar,
had a higher regard for our country than for our offices. They slander us
about the colonies and so excite you against us. If there are any present
who have been settled in colonies, or are about to be settled, you will
gratify me by making yourselves known.</q> </p>
</div><div n="140" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>A large number did so, whereupon Brutus continued, <q rend="double">Bravo, my men, you have
done well to come here with the others. You ought, since you receive due
honors and bounties from your country, to give her equal honor in return as
she sends you forth. The Roman people gave you to Caesar to fight
against the Gauls and Britons, and your valiant deeds call for recognition
and recompense. But Caesar, taking advantage of your military oath,
led you against your country much against your will. He led you against our
best citizens in Africa, in like manner against your will. If this were all
that you had done you would perhaps be ashamed to ask reward for such
exploits, but since neither envy, nor time, nor the forgetfulness of men can
extinguish the glory of your deeds in Gaul and Britain, you shall have the
rewards due to them, such as the people gave to those who served in the army
of old, yet not by taking land from your unoffending fellow-citizens, nor by
dividing other people’s property with new-comers, nor by considering it
proper to requite your services by means of acts of injustice. When our
ancestors overcame their enemies they did not take from them all their land.
They shared it with them and colonized a portion of it with Roman soldiers,
who were to serve as guards over the vanquished. If the conquered territory
was not sufficient for the colonies, they added some of the public domain or
bought other land with the public money. In this way the people colonized
you without harm to anybody. But Sulla and Caesar, who invaded
their country like a foreign land and needed guards and garrisons against
their own country, did not dismiss you to your homes, nor buy land for you,
nor divide among you the property of citizens which they confiscated, nor
did they make compensation for the relief of those who were despoiled,
although those who despoiled them had plenty of money from the treasury and
plenty from confiscated estates. They took, by the law of war, — nay, by
the practice of robbery, — from Italians who had committed no offence, who
had done no wrong, their land and houses, tombs and temples, which we do not
take away even from foreign enemies, except a mere tenth of their produce by
way of tax.</q> </p>
</div><div n="141" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double">They divided among you the property of your own people, the very ones who
sent you with Caesar to the Gallic war, and who offered up their
prayers at your festival of victory. They colonized you in that way
collectively, under your standards and in your military organization, so
that you could neither enjoy peace nor be free from fear of those whom you
displaced. The man who is driven out and deprived of his goods will always
be watching his opportunity to ensnare you. This was the very thing that the
tyrants sought to accomplish, — not to provide you with land, which they
could have obtained for you elsewhere; but that you, because always beset by
lurking enemies, might be the firm bulwark of a government that was
committing wrongs in common with you. A common interest between tyrants and
their satellites grows out of common crimes and common fears. And this, ye
gods, they call colonization, in which are common the lamentations of a
kindred people and the expulsion of innocent men from their homes. They
purposely made you enemies to your countrymen for their own advantage. We,
the defenders of the republic, to whom our opponents say they grant safety
out of pity, confirm this very same land to you and will confirm it forever;
and to this promise we call to witness the god of this temple.<note resp="translator">The temple of the Capitoline
Jove.</note> You have and shall keep what you have received. None of us
will take it from you, neither Brutus, nor Cassius, nor any of us who have
incurred danger for your freedom. The one thing wanting in this business we
will supply — a reconciliation with your fellow-countrymen most agreeable
to them now, as they hear that we shall at once pay them out of the public
money the price of this land of which they have been deprived; so that not
only shall your colony be secure, but it shall not even be exposed to
hatred.</q> </p>
</div><div n="142" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While Brutus was still speaking in this sort, and after the assembly was
dissolved, his discourse was approved by all as being entirely just. He and
his associates were admired as men of intrepidity, and as peculiarly the
friends of the people. The latter were favorably inclined toward them, and
promised to coöperate with them on the following day. At daybreak
the consuls called the people to an assembly and communicated to them the
decisions of the Senate, and Cicero pronounced a long encomium on the decree
of amnesty. The people were delighted with it and invited Cassius and his
friends to come down from the Capitol. The latter asked that hostages be
sent to them in the meantime, and, accordingly, the sons of Antony and
Lepidus were sent. When Brutus and his associates made their appearance they
were received with shouts of applause, and when the consuls desired to say
something the people would not allow them to do so, but demanded that they
should first shake hands with these men and make peace with them, which was
done. The minds of the consuls were much disturbed by fear and envy lest the
conspirators should get the upper hand of them in other political
matters.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="20" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XX</head>
<head>The Reading of Caesar’s Will — Antony’s Funeral Oration — The
Populace roused to Fury — The Murderers flee from the City</head>
<div n="143" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Caesar’s will was now produced and the people ordered that it be
read at once. In it Octavius, the grandson of his sister, was adopted by
Caesar. His gardens were given to the people as a place of
recreation, and to every Roman still living in the city he gave seventy-five
Attic drachmas.<note resp="translator">About $14.</note>
The people were again stirred to anger when they saw the will of this lover
of his country, whom they had before heard accused of tyranny. Most of all
did it seem pitiful to them that Decimus Brutus, one of the murderers,
should have been named by him for adoption in the second degree; for it was
customary for the Romans to name alternate heirs in case of the failure of
the first. Whereupon there was still greater disturbance among the people,
who considered it shocking and sacrilegious that Decimus should have
conspired against Caesar when he had been adopted as his son. When
Piso brought Caesar’s body into the forum a countless multitude ran
together with arms to guard it, and with acclamations and magnificent
display placed it on the rostra. Wailing and lamentation were renewed for a
long time, the armed men clashed their shields, and gradually they began to
repent themselves of the amnesty. Antony, seeing how things were going, did
not abandon his purpose, but, having been chosen to deliver the funeral
oration, as a consul for a consul, a friend for a friend, a relative for a
relative (for he was related to Caesar on his mother’s side),
resumed his artful design and spoke as follows:— </p>
</div><div n="144" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double">It is not fitting, citizens, that the funeral oration of so great a man
should be pronounced by me alone, but rather by his whole country. The
decrees which all of us, in equal admiration of his merit, voted to him
while he was alive — the Senate and the people acting together — I will
read, so that I may voice your sentiments rather than my own.</q> Then he began
to read with a severe and gloomy countenance, pronouncing each sentence
distinctly and dwelling especially on those decrees which declared
Caesar to be superhuman, sacred, and inviolable, and which named
him the father of his country, or the benefactor, or the chieftain without a
peer. With each decree Antony turned his face and his hand toward
Caesar’s corpse, illustrating his discourse by his action, and at
each appellation he added some brief remark full of grief and indignation;
as, for example, where the decree spoke of Caesar as the father of
his country he added that this was a testimonial of his clemency; and again,
where he was made sacred and inviolable and everybody else was to be held
unharmed who should find refuge with him,— <q rend="double">Nobody,</q> said Antony, <q rend="double">who
found refuge with him was harmed, but he, whom you declared sacred and
inviolable, was killed, although he did not extort these honors from you as
a tyrant, and did not even ask for them. Most servile are we if we give such
honors to the unworthy who do not ask for them. But you, faithful citizens,
vindicate us from this charge of servility by paying such honors as you now
pay to the dead.</q> </p>
</div><div n="145" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Antony resumed his reading and recited the oaths by which all were pledged to
guard Caesar and Caesar’s body with all their strength,
and all were devoted to perdition who should not avenge him against any
conspiracy. Here, lifting up his voice and extending his hand toward the
Capitol, he exclaimed, <q rend="double">Jupiter, guardian of this city, and ye other gods, I
stand ready to avenge him as I have sworn and vowed, but since those who are
of equal rank with me have considered the decree of amnesty beneficial, I
pray that it may prove so.</q> A commotion arose among the senators in
consequence of this exclamation, which seemed to have special reference to
them. So Antony quieted them again and recanted, saying, <q rend="double">It seems to me,
fellow-citizens, that this deed is not the work of human beings, but of some
evil spirit. It becomes us to consider the present rather than the past,
since the greatest danger approaches, if it is not already here, lest we be
drawn into our former civil commotions and lose whatever remains of noble
birth in the city. Let us then conduct this sacred one to the abode of the
blest, chanting our accustomed hymn of lamentation for him.</q> </p>
</div><div n="146" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Having spoken thus,, he gathered up his garments like one inspired, girded
himself so that he might have the free use of his hands, took his position
in front of the bier as in a play, bending down to it and rising again, and
sang first as to a celestial deity. In order to testify to Caesar’s
godlike origin, he raised his hands to heaven and with rapid speech recited
his wars, his battles, his victories, the nations he had brought under his
country’s sway, and the spoils he had sent home, extolling each exploit as
miraculous, and all the time exclaiming, <q rend="double">Thou alone hast come forth
unvanquished from all the battles thou hast fought. Thou alone hast avenged
thy country of the out-rage put upon it 300 years ago, bringing to their
knees those savage tribes, the only ones that ever broke into and burned the
city of Rome.</q> Many other things Antony said in a kind of divine frenzy, and
then lowered his voice from its high pitch to a sorrowful tone, and mourned
and wept as for a friend who had suffered unjustly, and prayed that his own
life might be given in exchange for Caesar’s. Carried away by
extreme passion he uncovered the body of Caesar, lifted his robe on
the point of a spear and shook it aloft, pierced with dagger-thrusts and red
with the dictator’s blood. Whereupon the people, like a chorus, mourned with
him in the most lugubrious manner, and from sorrow became again filled with
anger. After the discourse other lamentations were chanted with funeral
music according to the national custom, by the people in chorus, to the
dead; and his deeds and his sad fate were again recited. Somewhere from the
midst of these lamentations Caesar himself was supposed to speak,
recounting the benefits he had conferred on his enemies by name, and
speaking of the murderers themselves, exclaiming, as it were, <q rend="double">Oh that I
should have spared these men to slay me.</q><note resp="translator">A quotation from the Latin poet Pacuvius. The original is
given in Suetonius: <q rend="double">Men’ servasse, ut essent qui me perderent!</q></note>
The people could endure it no longer. It seemed to them monstrous that all
the murderers who, with the single exception of Decimus Brutus, had been
made prisoners while belonging to the faction of Pompey, and who, instead of
being punished, had been advanced by Caesar to the magistracies of
Rome and to the command of provinces and armies, should have conspired
against him; and that Decimus should have been deemed by him worthy of
adoption as his son. </p>
</div><div n="147" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While they were in this temper and were already near to violence, somebody
raised above the bier an image of Caesar himself made of wax.<note resp="translator">Waxen images of the deceased were
common in the funerals of distinguished persons in Rome.</note> The body
itself, as it lay on its back on the couch, could not be seen. The image was
turned round and round by a mechanical device, showing the twenty-three
wounds in all parts of the body and on the face, which gave him a shocking
appearance. The people could no longer bear the pitiful sight presented to
them. They groaned, and, girding themselves, they burned the senate-chamber
where Caesar was slain, and ran hither and thither searching for
the murderers, who had fled some time previously. They were so mad with rage
and grief that like wild beasts they tore in pieces the tribune Cinna on
account of his similarity of name to the praetor Cinna who had made a speech
against Caesar, not waiting to hear any explanation about the
simhilarity of name, so that no part of him was ever found for burial.<note resp="translator">Suetonius (<title>Jul.</title> 85)
and Valerius Maximus (ix. 9) agreed with Appian that this victim of
error was the tribune Cinna, whose surname was Helvius. Plutarch says
that he was a poet, or rather a man of a poetical turn.</note> They
carried fire to the houses of the other murderers, but the domestics
valiantly fought them off and the neighbors besought them to desist. So the
people abstained from the use of fire, but they threatened to come back with
arms on the following day.<note resp="translator">Merivale (<title>Hist. of the Romans under the Empire,</title> ii. 84)
considers this report of Antony’s funeral oration <q rend="double">no rhetorical
fiction, but a fair representation both in manner and substance of the
actual harangue.</q> Cicero bore testimony to the effectiveness of Antony’s
discourse when he spoke of it in the second Philippic (36) as <q rend="double">that
beautiful encomium, that mournful dirge, that appeal to passion.</q> 
adding: <q rend="double">thou, thou I say, didst light the fire that half consumed his
body and burned down the house of L. Bellienus. Thou didst precipitate
upon our homes that mob of abandoned men, mostly slaves, whom we drove
back by force and violence.</q></note>
</p>
</div><div n="148" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The murderers fled from the city secretly. The people returned to
Caesar’s bier and bore it as a consecrated thing to the Capitol in
order to bury it in the temple and place it among the gods. Being prevented
from doing so by the priests, they placed it again in the forum where in the
olden time stood the palace of the kings of Rome. There they collected
together sticks of wood and benches, of which there were many in the forum,
and anything else they could find of that sort, for a funeral pile, throwing
on it the adornments of the procession, some of which were very costly. Some
of them cast their own crowns upon it and many military gifts. Then they set
fire to it, and the entire people remained by the funeral pile throughout
the night. There an altar was first erected,<note resp="translator">Suetonius gives a similar account of Caesar’s
funeral, and adds: <q rend="double">They afterward placed in the forum a solid column of
Numidian marble nearly twenty feet high and inscribed on it the words 
<q rend="single">To the Father of his Country,</q> at which they continued for a long time
to offer sacrifice, to take vows, and to adjust controversies in which
the oath was taken in the name of Caesar.</q> (<title>Jul.</title>
85.) This column was demolished by the consul Dolabella, who flung over
the Tarpeian rock the free persons who participated in these ceremonies,
crucified the slaves, and caused the ground to be repaved. This must
have taken place shortly before the first of May, as Cicero, then at
Puteoli, wrote a letter to Atticus on that day in which he mentioned it
as news just received by him. <q rend="double">Oh, my admirable Dolabella,</q> he says, <q rend="double">I
now call him mine, for believe me, I had some little doubt of him
before. The affair presents a great outlook. Over the rock! On the
cross! The column demolished, the place itself under contract to be
paved. Is it not heroic? He seems to me to have put an end to that
appearance of regret for Caesar which was hitherto spreading
from day to day, and becoming chronic, so that I feared lest it should
prove dangerous to our tyrant-killers.</q> (<title>Ad Att.</title> xiv.
15.)</note> but now there stands the temple of Caesar himself,
as he was deemed worthy of divine honors; for Octavius, his son by adoption,
who took the name of Caesar, and, following in the footsteps of the
latter in political matters, greatly strengthened the government founded by
Caesar, and which remains to this day, decreed divine honors to his
father. From this example the Romans now pay like honors to each emperor at
his death if he has not reigned in a tyrannical manner or made himself
odious, although at first they could not bear to call them kings while
living.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="21" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XXI</head>
<head>Comparison of Caesar with Alexander</head>
<div n="149" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>So died Gaius Caesar on the so-called Ides of March, which
correspond nearly with the middle of the Greek month Anthesterion, which day
the soothsayer predicted that he should not survive. Caesar
jokingly said to him early in the morning, <q rend="double">Well, the Ides have come,</q> and
the latter, nothing daunted, answered, <q rend="double">But they are not past.</q> Despising
such prophecies, uttered with so much confidence by the soothsayer, and
other prodigies that I have previously mentioned, Caesar went on
his way and was killed, being fifty-six years of age.<note resp="translator">Mommsen maintains, contrary to the testimony of
Suetonius, Plutarch, and Appian, that Caesar was fifty-eight
instead of fifty-six years old at the time of his death. He reasons that
Caesar must have been born as early as the year 652 in order to
hold the offices of aedile, praetor, and consul at the
time when he was first elected to them, supposing that he was elected to
each as early as he could be legally. Although the age limit was relaxed
in special cases, we find no mention of exception in favor of
Caesar, and it is hardly possible that three exceptions could
have been made in favor of so illustrious a man without any mention of
it occurring in ancient writings. There are other facts which tend to
corroborate Mommsen’s view, which is now generally accepted by
scholars.</note> He was a man most fortunate in all things, superhuman,
of grand designs, and fit to be compared with Alexander. Both were men of
the greatest ambition, both were most skilled in the art of war, most rapid
in executing their decisions, most reckless of danger, least sparing of
themselves, and relying as much on audacity and luck as on military skill.
Alexander made a long journey through the desert in the hot season to visit
the oracle of Ammon and crossed the Gulf of Pamphylia against a head sea
successfully. A god restrained the waves for him until he had passed over,
and sent him rain on his journey by land. In India he ventured upon an
unknown sea. Once he was the first to ascend the scaling ladders and leaped
over the wall among his enemies alone, and in this condition received
thirteen wounds. Yet he was never defeated, and he finished almost every war
in one or two battles. He conquered many barbarians in Europe and made
himself master of Greece, a people hard to control, fond of freedom, who
boasted that they had never obeyed anybody before him, except Philip for a
little while under the guise of his leadership in war. He overran almost the
whole of Asia. To sum up Alexander’s fortune and power in a word, he
acquired as much of the earth as he saw, and died while he was devising
means to capture the rest. </p>
</div><div n="150" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The Adriatic Sea yielded to Caesar, becoming navigable and quiet in
mid-winter. He also crossed the western ocean to Britain, which had never
been attempted before, and he ordered his pilots to break their ships in
pieces by running them on the rocks of the British coast.<note resp="translator">This is nonsense. Caesar
himself says (<title>Gallic War,</title> v. 10) that while he was
advancing into the interior of Britain, word was brought to him that a
great storm had arisen in the night and dashed almost all of his ships
in pieces on the shore, so that he was obliged to abandon his expedition
temporarily.</note> He was exposed to the violence of another tempest
when alone in a small boat by night, and he ordered the pilot to spread his
sails and to keep in mind Caesar’s fortune rather than the waves of
the sea. He often dashed against the enemy single-handed when all others
were afraid. He fought thirty pitched battles in Gaul alone, where he
conquered forty nations so formidable to the Romans previously that in the
law which exempted priests and old men from military enrolment an exception
was made of a Gallic war, in case of which priests and old men were required
to serve in the army. Once in the course of the Alexandrian war, when he was
left alone on a bridge in extreme peril, he threw off his purple garment,
leaped into the sea, and, being sought by the enemy, swam under water a long
distance, coming to the surface only at intervals to take breath, until he
came near a friendly ship, when he made himself known by raising his hands,
and was saved. In these civil wars, in which he engaged either through
apprehension, as he says, or ambition, he was brought in conflict with the
first generals of the age and with many large armies, not now of barbarians,
but of Romans in the highest state of efficiency and good fortune, and, like
Alexander, he overcame them all by one or two engagements with each. His
forces were not, like Alexander’s, always victorious, for they were defeated
by the Gauls most disastrously under the command of his lieutenants, Cotta
and Titurius; and in Spain Petreius and Afranius shut them up like an army
besieged. At Dyrrachium and in Africa they were put to flight, and in Spain
they were terrified by young Pompey. But Caesar himself was always
undaunted and was victorious at the end of every war. He grasped, partly by
force, partly by good-will, the Roman power which ruled the earth and sea
from the setting sun to the river Euphrates, and held it much more firmly
and strongly than Sulla had done, and he showed himself to be a king in
spite of opposition, even though he did not accept the title. And, like
Alexander, he expired while planning new wars. </p>
</div><div n="151" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Their armies were equally zealous and devoted to both, and in battles they
fought with the greatest ferocity, but were often disobedient and mutinous
on account of the severity of their tasks. Yet they mourned and longed for
their commanders when they were dead, and paid them divine honors. Both were
well-formed and handsome in person, and both were descended from Jupiter,
Alexander through Aeacus and Hercules, Caesar through
Anchises and Venus. Both were as prompt to fight their adversaries as they
were ready to make peace and grant pardon to the vanquished, and after
pardon to confer benefits; for they desired only to conquer. Thus far let
the parallel hold good, although they did not both start toward empire from
the same footing; Alexander from the monarchy founded by Philip,
Caesar from a private station, well born and illustrious indeed,
but very short of money. </p>
</div><div n="152" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Both of them despised the prodigies relating to themselves, but they did not
deal harshly with the sooth-sayers who predicted their death; for more than
once the very same prodigies confronted both, pointing to the same end.
Twice in the case of each the victims were without a liver, and the first
time it indicated a doubtful danger. It happened to Alexander when he was
among the Oxydracae and while he was leading his Macedonians in
scaling the enemy’s wall. The ladder broke, leaving him alone on the top.
Taking counsel of his courage, he leaped inside the town against his
enemies, and was struck severely in the breast and on the neck by a very
heavy club, so that he fell down, and was rescued with difficulty by the
Macedonians, who broke down the gates in their alarm for him. It happened to
Caesar in Spain while his army was in great fear of young Pompey,
and hesitated to join battle. Caesar dashed in advance of all into
the space between the armies, and received 200 darts on his shield until his
army, moved by shame and fear for his safety, rushed forward and rescued
him. Thus in the case of each the first victims without livers presaged
danger of death; the second presaged death itself. As Peithagoras, the
soothsayer, was inspecting the entrails, he told Apollodorus, who was in
fear of Alexander and Hephestion, not to be afraid of them, because they
would both be out of the way very soon. Hephestion died immediately, and
Apollodorus, being apprehensive lest some conspiracy might exist against
Alexander, communicated the prophecy to him. Alexander smiled, and asked
Peithagoras himself what the prodigy meant. When the latter replied that it
meant fatality, he smiled again. Nevertheless, he commended Apollodorus for
his good-will and the soothsayer for his freedom of speech. </p>
</div><div n="153" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As Caesar was entering the Senate for the last time, as I have
shortly before related, the same omens were observed, but he said,
jestingly, that the same thing had happened to him in Spain. When the
soothsayer replied that he was in danger then too, and that the omen was now
more deadly, he yielded somewhat to the warning and sacrificed again, and
continued to do so until he became vexed with the priests for delaying him,
and went in and was killed. The same kind of thing happened to Alexander. As
he was returning from India to Babylon with his army, and was nearing the
latter place, the Chaldeans urged him to postpone his entrance for the
present. He replied with the iambic verse, <q rend="double">He who guesses right is the best
prophet.</q><note resp="translator">This is a line from
Euripides, which had passed into a proverb in both Greek and Latin.
Schweighäuser cites several authors who used it — among them
Arrian (<title>Expeditio Alex.</title> vii. 16), who also gives us a
more detailed account of this affair of Alexander and the
Chaldeans.</note> Again, the Chaldeans urged him not to march his army
into the city while looking toward the setting sun, but to go around and
enter facing the east. It is said that he yielded to this suggestion and
started to go around, but being bothered by a lake and marshy ground, he
disregarded this second prophecy also, and entered the city looking toward
the west. Not long after entering he went down the Euphrates in a boat to
the river Pallacotta, which takes its water from the Euphrates and carries
it away in marshes and ponds and thus hinders the irrigation and navigation
of the Assyrian country. While he was considering how he should dyke this
stream and while he was sailing out to it for this purpose, it is said that
he jeered at the Chaldeans because he had gone into Babylon and sailed out
of it safely. But scarcely had he returned back to it when he died.
Caesar jeered at the prophecies in like manner, for the soothsayer
predicted the day of his death, saying that he should not survive the Ides
of March, and when the day came Caesar mocked him saying, <q rend="double">The Ides
have come</q>; and the same day he died. Thus both alike made light of the
prophecies concerning themselves, and were not angry at the soothsayers who
uttered them, yet they became the inevitable victims of the prophecies. </p>
</div><div n="154" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Both were students of the science and arts<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπιστήμην τῆς ἀρετῆς</foreign>:
literally, <q rend="double">the science of excellence,</q> which is by no means clear.
Nauck marks the last word doubtful.</note> of their own country, of
Greece, and of foreign nations. As to those of India, Alexander interrogated
the Brahmins who seem to be the astronomers and learned men of that country,
like the Magi among the Persians. Caesar likewise interrogated the
Egyptians while he was there restoring Cleopatra to the throne, by which
means he made many improvements among the peaceful arts for the Romans. He
changed the calendar, which was still in disorder by reason of the
intercalary months till then in use, for the Romans reckoned the year by the
moon. Caesar changed it to the sun’s course, as the Egyptians
reckoned it.<note resp="translator">Caesar
also, at this time, changed the beginning of the year from the first of
March to the first of January, because the latter was the date for
changing the supreme magistrates. <q rend="double">Both changes came into effect on the
first January 709 of the city (<date when="-0045">45</date> B.C.), and
along with them the use of the Julian Calendar, so named after its
author, which, long after the fall of the monarchy of Caesar,
remained the regulative standard of the civilized world, and in the main
is so still.</q> (<title>Mommsen.</title>)</note> It happened in his case
that not one of the conspirators against him escaped, but all were brought
to condign punishment by his adopted son, just as the murderers of Philip
were by Alexander. How they were punished the succeeding books will show. <figure>
<head>MARK ANTONY</head>
<figDesc>In the Vatican Museum, Rome</figDesc>
</figure>
</p>
</div></div>
</div>
<div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="book">
<head>BOOK III</head>
 <div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER I</head>
<head>The City after Caesar’s Funeral — Antony puts the False Marius
to Death — He deceives the Senate — He falsifies Caesar’s
Decrees — Brutus and Cassius leave the City — Dolabella appointed
Governor of Syria and Antony Governor of Macedonia</head>
<div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>I. THUS was Gaius Caesar, who had been foremost in extending the
Roman sway, slain by his enemies and buried by the people. All of his
murderers were brought to punishment. How the most distinguished of them
were punished this book and the next one will show, and the other civil wars
waged by the Romans will likewise be included in them. </p></div>
<div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The Senate blamed Antony for his funeral oration over Caesar, by
which, chiefly, the people were incited to disregard the decree of amnesty
lately passed, and to scour the city in order to fire the houses of the
murderers. But he changed it from bad to good feeling toward himself by one
capital stroke of policy. There was a certain pseudo-Marius in Rome named
Amatius. He pretended to be a grandson of Marius, and for this reason was
popular with the masses. Being, according to this pretence, a relative of
Caesar, he was pained beyond measure by the latter’s death, and
erected an altar on the site of his funeral pyre. He collected a band of
reckless men and made himself a perpetual terror to the murderers. Some of
these had fled from the city, and those who had accepted the command of
provinces from Caesar himself had gone away to take charge of the
same, Decimus Brutus to Cisalpine Gaul, Trebonius to Asia adjoining Ionia,
and Tillius Cimber to Bithynia. Cassius and Marcus Brutus, who were the
special favorites of the Senate, had been chosen by Caesar as
governors for the following year, the former of Syria, and the latter of
Macedonia. Being still city praetors, they remained there
necessarily, and in their official capacity they conciliated the colonists
by various decrees, and among others by one enabling them to sell their
allotments, the law hitherto forbidding the alienation of the land till the
end of twenty years. </p>
</div><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>It was said that Amatius was only waiting an opportunity to entrap Brutus and
Cassius. On the rumor of this plot,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">τῆς ἐνέδρας ὁ Ἀντώνιος
ἐπιβαίνων.</foreign> There is a curious resemblance in these words
to our slang phrase <q rend="double">getting on to his game.</q></note> Antony, using his
consular authority, arrested Amatius and boldly put him to death without a
trial. The senators were astonished at this deed as an act of violence and
contrary to law, but they enjoyed it exceedingly because they thought that
the situation of Brutus and Cassius would never be safe without such
boldness. The followers of Amatius, and the plebeians generally, missing
Amatius and feeling indignation at the deed, and especially because it had
been done by Antony, whom the people had honored, determined that they would
not be scorned in that way. With shouts they took possession of the forum,
exclaiming against Antony and called on the magistrates, in place of
Amatius, to dedicate the altar and to offer the first sacrifices on it to
Caesar. Having been driven out of the forum by soldiers sent by
Antony, they became still more indignant, and vociferated more loudly, and
some of them showed places where Caesar’s statues had been torn
from their pedestals. One man told them that he could show a shop where the
statues had been broken up. The others followed, and having witnessed the
fact, they set fire to the place. Finally, Antony sent more soldiers and
some of those who resisted were killed, others were captured, and of these
the slaves were crucified and the freemen thrown over the Tarpeian
rock.<note resp="translator">Cicero in the first
Philippic refers to the killing of this impostor as the act of Antony
and Dolabella in common, and says that the rest of the work was done by
Dolabella alone; but he believes that if Antony had been present he
would have coöperated with his colleague. Valerius Maximus says
that the pseudo-Marius was a horse doctor (<foreign xml:lang="lat">equarius
medicus</foreign>) and that his real name was Herophilus. <q rend="double">He gave
out that C. Marius was his grandfather, and so extolled himself that
several colonies of veterans, and towns of the first class, and almost
all the rural communities, adopted him as their patron. When
Caesar opened his gardens to the people after he had made an
end of young Pompey in Spain, Herophilus, who was separated from
Caesar by only the space between two columns, was received by
the crowd with almost as much enthusiasm as himself, so that unless the
powers of the godlike Caesar had put a stop to these shameful
outbursts, the republic would have received the same hurt as in the case
of Equitius (the pseudo-Gracchus).</q> (<title>Val. Max.</title> ix. 15.
2.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>So this tumult was quieted. The extreme fondness of the plebeians for Antony
was turned into extreme hatred. The Senate was delighted, because it
believed that Brutus and his associates could not rest secure
otherwise.<note resp="translator">As we have no
dates in the text we are left in confusion as to the state of affairs in
Rome at any particular time. The assassination took place on the 15th of
March. Cassius and Marcus Brutus retired to Lanuvium as soon as it
appeared that their lives were in danger in Rome. A letter written to
them in the month of April by Decimus Brutus, who had not yet gone to
Cisalpine Gaul, is preserved among the letters of Cicero. He says he has
had an interview with Hirtius, who tells him that Antony did not
consider Rome a safe place for any of them, because the soldiers and the
plebeians were so incensed against them. <q rend="double">Do you ask me,</q> he continues,
 <q rend="double">what I advise? Let us submit to fortune, withdraw from Italy, and
retire to Rhodes, or some other part of the world. If better luck comes,
we can return to Rome; if no change occurs, we can live in exile; if
worst comes to worst, we can try our last resources.</q> (<title>Ad
Fam.</title> xi. I.)</note> Antony also moved that Sextus Pompeius
(the son of Pompey the Great, who was still much beloved by all) should be
recalled from Spain, where he was still at war with Caesar’s
lieutenants, and that he should be paid 50,000,000 of Attic drachmas<note resp="translator">In the 13th Philippic of Cicero
(5) the amount voted to Sextus Pompey in compensation for his father’s
confiscated estates is put at seven hundred millions of sesterces or
$28,700,000 of our money. This was exactly the amount that was in the
temple of Ops (the produce of confiscated estates) at the time of
Caesar’s death (2d Philippic, 37). Fifty millions of Attic
drachmas would have been equal to about $ 10,000,000.</note> out of the
public treasury for his father’s confiscated property and be appointed
commander of the sea, as his father had been, with charge of all the Roman
ships, wherever situated, which were needed for immediate service. The
astonished Senate accepted each of these decrees with alacrity and applauded
Antony the whole day; for nobody, in their estimation, was more devoted to
the republic than the elder Pompey, and hence nobody was more regretted.
Cassius and Brutus, who were of Pompey’s faction, and the ones most honored
by all at that time, thought that they would be entirely safe. They thought
that what they had done would be confirmed, and the republic be at last
restored, and their party successful. Wherefore Cicero praised Antony
continually,<note resp="translator">In the first
Philippic Cicero acknowledges that he was deceived by Antony during the
first few days after the assassination. Among other things Antony moved
that the dictatorship be forever abolished. He produced a
<foreign xml:lang="lat">senatus consultum</foreign> in writing for this purpose,
which he wished to have passed; <q rend="double">and when it was read,</q> says Cicero, <q rend="double">we
adopted his motion with the greatest enthusiasm and by another
<foreign xml:lang="lat">senatus consultum</foreign> returned our thanks to him in
the amplest terms.</q> (<title>Phil.</title> I. I.)</note> and the Senate,
perceiving that the plebeians were making plots against him on its account,
allowed him a guard for his personal safety, chosen by himself from the
veterans who were sojourning in the city. </p>
</div><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Antony, either because he had done everything for this very purpose, or
seizing the happy chance as very useful to him, enlisted his guard and kept
adding to it till it amounted to 6000 men. They were not common soldiers. He
thought that he should easily get the latter for his service otherwise.
These were composed wholly of centurions, as being fit for command, and of
long experience in war, and his own acquaintances through service under
Caesar. He appointed tribunes over them, chosen from their own
number and adorned with military decoration, and these he held in honor and
made sharers of his public councils. The Senate began to be suspicious of
the number of his guards, and of his care in choosing them, and advised him
to reduce them to a moderate number so as to avoid invidious remarks. He
promised to do so as soon as the disorder among the plebeians should be
quieted. It had been decreed that all the things done by Caesar,
and all that he intended to do, should be ratified. The memoranda of
Caesar’s intentions were in Antony’s possession, and
Caesar’s secretary, Faberius, was obedient to him in every way
since Caesar himself, on the point of his departure, had placed all
petitions of this kind in Antony’s discretion. Antony made many additions in
order to secure the favor of many persons. He made gifts to cities, to
princes, and to his own guards, and although all were advised that these
were Caesar’s memoranda, yet the recipients knew that the favor was
due to Antony. In the same way he enrolled many new names in the list of
senators and did many other things to please the Senate, in order that it
might not bear him ill-will in reference to his guards. </p>
</div><div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While Antony was busy with these matters, Brutus and Cassius, seeing nobody
among either the plebeians or the veterans inclined to be at peace with
them, and considering that any other person might lay plots against them
like that of Amatius, became distrustful of the fickleness of Antony, who
now had an army under his command. Seeing that the republic was not
confirmed by deeds, they suspected Antony for that reason also. They reposed
most confidence in Decimus Brutus, who had three legions near by. They sent
secretly to Trebonius in Asia and to Tillius in Bithynia, asking them to
collect money quietly and to prepare an army. They were anxious to enter
upon the government of the provinces assigned to them by Caesar,
but as the time for doing so had not yet come, they thought that it would be
indecorous for them to leave their service as city praetors
unfinished, and that they should incur the suspicion of an undue longing for
power over the provinces. They preferred, nevertheless, to spend the
remainder of their year as private citizens somewhere, as a matter of
necessity, rather than serve as praetors in the city where they were not
safe, and were not held in honor corresponding to the benefits they had
conferred upon their country. Being in this state of mind, and the Senate
holding the same opinion as themselves, the latter gave them charge of the
supply of corn for the city from all parts of the world until the time
should arrive for them to take command of their provinces. This was done in
order that Brutus and Cassius might not at any time seem to have fled. So
great was the anxiety and regard for them that the Senate cared for the
other murderers chiefly on their account.<note resp="translator">Brutus and Cassius were at Antium when the Senate appointed
them commissioners of the food-supply, and Cicero went there to confer
with them. A consultation was held in which the mother, the sister, and
the wife of Brutus took part. Cassius at first declined his appointment,
saying that he considered it an insult, but he was finally soothed, and
both of them accepted. (<title>Ad Att.</title> xv. 11..)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After Brutus and Cassius had left the city, Antony, being in possession of
something like monarchical power, cast about for the government of a
province and an army for himself. He desired that of Syria most of all, but
he was not ignorant of the fact that he was under suspicion and that he
would be more so if he should ask for it; for the Senate had secretly
encouraged Dolabella, the other consul, to oppose Antony, as the former had
always been at variance with the latter. Antony, knowing that this young
Dolabella was himself ambitious, persuaded him to solicit the province of
Syria and the army enlisted against the Parthians, in place of Cassius, and
to ask it, not from the Senate, which had not the power to grant it,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">οὐ γὰρ
ἐξῆν.</foreign> This means that it is not within the competence of
the Senate to assign the province of Syria to Dolabella. Yet in the next
section we are informed that it was within the competence of the Senate
to assign the province of Macedonia to Antony. The fact is that the
competency of the Senate extended to both. Combes-Dounous suggests
<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἦ</foreign> instead of <foreign xml:lang="grc">οὐ,</foreign> changing it from negative to affirmative.</note> but
from the people by a law. Dolabella was delighted, and immediately brought
forward the law. The Senate accused him of nullifying the decrees of
Caesar. He replied that Caesar had not assigned the war
against the Parthians to anybody, and that Cassius, who had been assigned to
the command of Syria, had himself been the first to alter the decrees of
Caesar by authorizing colonists to sell their allotments before the
expiration of the legal period of twenty years. He said also that it would
be an indignity to himself if he, being Dolabella,<note resp="translator">That is, a man in his position, a consul whose
term was about expiring.</note> were not chosen for Syria instead of
Cassius. The Senate then persuaded one of the tribunes, named Asprenas, to
falsify the signs in the sky during the comitia,<note resp="translator">In which case the proceedings must be
suspended.</note> expecting that Antony, who was both consul and augur,
and was supposed to be still at variance with Dolabella, would
coöperate with him. But when the voting came on, and Asprenas said
that the signs in the sky were unfavorable, as it was not his business to
attend to this, <figure>
<head>THE YOUNG OCTAVIUS</head>
<figDesc>Vatican Museum (Duruy)</figDesc>
</figure>
</p>
<p>Antony, angry at his lying, ordered that the tribes should go on with the
voting on the subject of Dolabella. </p>
</div><div n="8" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus Dolabella became governor of Syria and general of the war against the
Parthians and of the forces enlisted for that purpose by Caesar,
together with those that had gone in advance to Macedonia. Then it became
known for the first time that Antony was coöperating with
Dolabella. After this business had been transacted by the people, Antony
solicited the province of Macedonia from the Senate, well knowing that after
Syria had been given to Dolabella, they would be ashamed to deny Macedonia
to himself, especially as it was a province without an army. They gave it to
him unwillingly, at the same time wondering why Antony should let Dolabella
have the army, but glad nevertheless that the latter had it rather than the
former. They themselves took the opportunity to ask of Antony other
provinces for Brutus and Cassius. They assigned to them Cyrenaica and Crete;
or, as some say, both of these to Cassius and Bithynia to Brutus. Such was
the state of affairs at Rome.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER II</head>
<head>The Young Octavius in Apollonia — He comes to Italy — Caesar’s
Soldiers receive him gladly — He moves toward Rome — He resolves to
avenge Caesar — He visits Antony and reads him a Lecture —
Antony’s Reply</head>
<div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius, the son of the daughter of Caesar’s sister, had been
appointed master of Caesar’s horse for one year, for
Caesar at times made this a yearly office, passing it around among
his friends. Being still a young man, he had been sent by Caesar to
Apollonia on the Adriatic to be educated and trained in the art of war, so
that he might accompany Caesar on his expeditions. Troops of horse
from Macedonia were sent to him by turns for the purpose of drill, and
certain army officers visited him frequently as a relative of
Caesar. As he received all with kindness, an acquaintance and good
feeling grew up by means of them between himself and the army. At the end of
a six months’ sojourn in Apollonia, it was announced to him one evening that
Caesar had been killed in the senate-house by those who were
dearest to him, and were then the most powerful ones under him. As the rest
of the story was untold he was overcome by fear, not knowing whether the
deed had been committed by the Senate as a whole or was confined to the
immediate actors; nor whether they had already been punished by the people,
or would be,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">καὶ εἰ δίκην ἤδη τοῖς πλείοσι δεδώκοιεν, ἢ
καὶ τοῦδε εἶεν.</foreign> All commentators are agreed that the
last two words are corrupt; they convey no meaning. Among the numerous
conjectures made by way of emendation that of Bekker seems the most
reasonable, viz.: <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἢ καὶ δώσοιεν,</foreign> <q rend="double">or
would be punished.</q> This reading has been followed in the translation.
The Didot Latin version follows that of Schweighäuser, viz.:
<foreign xml:lang="lat">utrum poenas jam populo dedissent interfectores, aut saltem
eas timerent;</foreign> i.e. <q rend="double">whether the murderers had already been
punished by the people, or at least feared punishment.</q></note> or
whether the people were pleased with what had been done. </p>
</div><div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thereupon his Roman friends advised him to take refuge with the army in
Macedonia to insure his personal safety, and that when he should learn that
the murder was only a private transaction he should take courage and avenge
Caesar of his enemies; and there were high officers who promised to
protect him if he would come. But his mother and his stepfather, Philippus,
wrote to him from Rome not to be too confident and not to attempt anything
rash, but to bear in mind what Caesar, after conquering every
enemy, had suffered at the hands of his closest friends; that it would be
safer under present circumstances to choose a private life and hasten to
them at Rome, but with caution. Octavius yielded to them because he did not
know what had happened after Caesar’s death. He took leave of the
army officers and crossed the Adriatic, not to Brundusium (for as he had
made no test of the army at that place he avoided all risk), but to another
town not far from it and out of the direct route, named Lupiae.
There he took lodgings and remained for a while. </p>
</div><div n="11" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When more accurate information about the murder and the public grief had
reached him, together with copies of Caesar’s will and the decrees
of the Senate, his relatives still cautioned him to beware of the enemies of
Caesar, as he was the latter’s adopted son and heir. They even
advised him to renounce the adoption, together with the inheritance. But he
thought that to do so, and not to avenge Caesar, would be
disgraceful. So he went to Brundusium, first sending in advance to see that
none of the murderers had laid any trap for him. When the army there
advanced to meet him, and received him as Caesar’s son, he took
courage, offered sacrifice, and immediately assumed the name of
Caesar; for it is customary among the Romans for the adopted son to
take the name of the adoptive father. He not only assumed it, but he changed
his own name and his patronymic completely, calling himself Caesar
the son of Caesar, instead of Octavius the son of Octavius, and he
continued to do so ever after. Directly multitudes of men from all sides
flocked to him as Caesar’s son, some from friendship to
Caesar, others his freedmen and slaves, and with them other
soldiers, who were either engaged in conveying supplies and money to the
army in Macedonia, or bringing other money and tribute from other countries
to Brundusium. </p>
</div><div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Encouraged by the numbers who were joining him, and by the glory of
Caesar, and by the good-will of all toward himself, he journeyed to
Rome with a notable crowd which, like a torrent, grew larger and larger each
day. Although he was safe from any open attacks by reason of the multitude
surrounding him, he was all the more on his guard against secret ones,
because almost all of those accompanying him were new acquaintances. Some of
the towns were not altogether favorable to him, but Caesar’s
veterans, who had been distributed in colonies, flocked from their
settlements to greet the young man. They bewailed Caesar, and
cursed Antony for not proceeding against the monstrous crime, and said that
they would avenge it if anybody would lead them. Octavius praised them, but
postponed the matter for the present and sent them away. When he had arrived
at Tarracina, about 400 stades from Rome, he received news that Cassius and
Brutus had been deprived of Syria and Macedonia by the consuls, and had
received the smaller provinces of Cyrenaica and Crete by way of
compensation; that certain exiles had returned; that Sextus Pompey had been
recalled; that some new members had been added to the Senate in accordance
with Caesar’s memoranda, and that many other things were
happening.<note resp="translator">Octavius went to
Rome by way of Naples. In a letter to Atticus, written at Puteoli in
April, Cicero says: <q rend="double">Octavius arrived at Naples on the 14th Kalends.
There Balbus saw him on the morning of the following day and on the same
day came to me at Cumae to tell me that he was going to claim
his inheritance; but, as you say, he will have a lively time with
Antony.</q> (<title>Ad Att.</title> xiv. 10.) In another letter he writes:
 <q rend="double">Octavius has arrived at the neighboring villa of Philippus. He is
devoted to me.</q> In the next letter he says: <q rend="double">Octavius treats me with
the greatest distinction and friendship. Some call him Caesar.
Philippus does not; therefore I do not. I am sure that he cannot be a
good citizen, so many of those around him threaten death to our friends
and say that these things cannot be borne. What think you when this boy
shall come to Rome where our liberators cannot live in safety? They will
always be famous, and happy also in the consciousness of what they have
done. But, unless I am deceived, we shall be flat on our backs.</q> 
(<title>Ad Att.</title> xiv. 12.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="13" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When he arrived at the city his mother and Philippus and the others who were
interested in him were anxious about the estrangement of the Senate from
Caesar, and the decree that his murderers should not be punished,
and the contempt shown him by Antony, who was then all-powerful, and had
neither gone to meet Caesar’s son when he was coming nor sent
anybody to him. Octavius quieted their fears, saying that he would call on
Antony, as the younger man on the older and the private citizen on the
consul, and that he would show proper respect for the Senate. As for the
decree, he said that it had been passed because nobody had prosecuted the
murderers; whenever anybody should have courage to prosecute, the people and
the Senate would lend their aid to him as one enforcing the law, the gods
would do so for the justice of his cause, and perhaps Antony himself would
help. If he (Octavius) should reject the inheritance and the adoption, he
would be false to Caesar and would wrong the people who had a share
in the will. As he was finishing his remarks he burst out that he ought not
only to incur danger, but even to die, after he had been preferred before
all others in this way by Caesar, if he would show himself worthy
of one who had himself braved every danger. Then turning to his mother, he
repeated the words of Achilles to Thetis, which were then fresh in his mind:
— <quote><q rend="double">Then quickly let me die since fate denied That I should aid my
friend against the foes That slew him.</q></quote></p>
<p><title>Iliad,</title> xviii. 98, Bryant’s translation.<note resp="translator">
<foreign xml:lang="grc">Αὐτίκα τεθναίην, ἐπεὶ οὐκ ἄρ’ ἔμελλον
ἑταίρῳ κτεινομένῳ ἐπαμῦναι.</foreign>
</note></p>
<p>After saying this he added that these words of Achilles, and especially the
deed that followed, had of all things given him immortal renown; and he
invoked Caesar not as a friend, but a father; not as a
fellow-soldier, but a commander-in-chief; not as one who had fallen by the
law of war, but as the victim of sacrilegious murder in the senate-house. </p>
</div><div n="14" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thereupon his mother’s anxiety was changed to joy, and she embraced him as
the only one worthy of Caesar. She checked his speaking and urged
him to prosecute his designs with the favor of fortune. She advised him,
however, to use art and patience rather than open boldness. Octavius
approved of this policy and promised to adopt it in action, and forthwith
sent around to his friends the same evening, asking them to come to the
forum early in the morning and bring a crowd with them. There presenting
himself to Gaius Antonius, the brother of Antony, who was the city
praetor, he said that he accepted the adoption of Caesar;
for it is a Roman custom that adoptions are confirmed by witnesses before
the praetors. When the public scribes had taken down his
declaration, Octavius went from the forum straightway to Antony. The latter
was in the gardens that Caesar had given to him, that had formerly
been Pompey’s. As Octavius was kept waiting at the vestibule for some time,
he interpreted the fact as a sign of Antony’s displeasure. When he was
admitted there were greetings and mutual questionings proper to the
occasion. When the time came to speak of the business in hand, Octavius
said: — </p>
</div><div n="15" type="textpart" subtype="section">
 <p><q rend="double">Father Antony (for the benefits that Caesar conferred upon you and
your gratitude toward him warrant me in giving you that title), for some of
the things that you have done since his death I praise you and owe you
thanks; for others I blame you. I shall speak freely of what my sorrow
prompts me to speak. When Caesar was killed you were not present,
as the murderers detained you at the door; otherwise you would have saved
him or incurred the danger of sharing the same fate with him. If the latter
would have befallen you, then it is well that you were not present. When
certain senators proposed rewards to the murderers as tyrannicides you
strongly opposed them. For this I give you hearty thanks, although you knew
that they intended to kill you also;<note resp="translator">The interpretation of this passage is doubtful.
Schweighäuser thinks that Octavius means to say that he thanks
Antony for opposing the proposition to reward the murderers, although he
may have had a selfish interest in doing so.</note> not, as I think,
because you were likely to avenge Caesar, but, as they themselves
say, lest you should be his successor in the tyranny. At the same time they
made it clear that they were not tyrant-killers, but murderers,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἅμα δ’
οὐκ ἦσαν ἐκεῖνοι τυραννοκτόνοι εἰ μὴ καὶ φονεῖς
ἦσαν</foreign>: literally, <q rend="double">these men were not tyrant-killers
unless they were murderers also.</q> I have followed the Latin version of
Schweighäuser, which differs from those of his predecessors. He
said that the text conveyed no clear meaning to him, and that his
version was guesswork.</note> by taking refuge in the Capitol, either as
guilty suppliants in a temple or as enemies in a fortress. How then could
they have obtained amnesty and impunity for their crime unless some portion
of the Senate and people had been corrupted by them? Yet you, as consul,
ought to have seen what would be for the interest of the majority,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">καὶ σὲ τὸ
τῶν πλεόνων ὀρᾷν ἑχρῆν, ὕπατον ὄντα.</foreign>
Schweighäuser and his predecessors rendered these words: <q rend="double">You
as consul ought to see what would be agreeable to the majority
(<foreign xml:lang="lat">quid placeret pluribus</foreign>).</q> The Didot version more
properly renders it <foreign xml:lang="lat">quid prodesset pluribus.</foreign></note>
and if you had wished to avenge such a monstrous crime, or to reclaim the
erring, your office would have enabled you to do either. But you sent
hostages from your own family to the murderers at the Capitol for their
security. Let us suppose that those who had been corrupted forced you to do
this also, yet when Caesar’s will had been read, and you had
delivered your righteous funeral oration, and the people, in lively
remembrance of Caesar, had carried firebrands to the houses of the
murderers, but spared them for the sake of their neighbors, agreeing to come
back armed the next day, why did you not coöperate with them and
lead them with fire or arms? Or why did you not bring them to trial, if
trial was necessary for men seen in the act of murder — you,
Caesar’s friend; you, the consul; you, Antony?</q> </p>
</div><div n="16" type="textpart" subtype="section">
 <p><q rend="double; merge">The pseudo-Marius was put to death by your order in the plenitude of your
authority, but you connived at the escape of the murderers, some of whom
have passed on to the provinces which they nefariously hold as gifts at the
hands of him whom they slew. These things were no sooner done than you and
Dolabella, the consuls, proceeded, very properly, to strip them and possess
yourselves of Syria and Macedonia. I should have owed you thanks for this
also, had you not immediately voted them Cyrenaica ana Crete; had you not
preferred these fugitives for governorships, where they can always defend
themselves against me, and had you not tolerated Decimus Brutus in the
command of Hither Gaul, although he, like the rest, was one of my father’s
slayers. It may be said that these were decrees of the Senate. But you put
the vote and you presided over the Senate — you who ought most of all to
have opposed them on your own account. To grant amnesty to the murderers was
merely to insure their personal safety as a matter of favor, but to vote
them provinces and rewards forthwith was to insult Caesar and annul
your own opinion. Grief has compelled me to speak these words, against the
rules of decorum perhaps, considering my youth and the respect I owe you.
They have been spoken, however, to the firmest friend of Caesar, to
one who was invested by him with the greatest honor and power, and who would
have been adopted by him no doubt if he had known that you would accept
kinship with the family of Aeneas in exchange for that of Hercules;
for this created doubt in his mind when he was thinking strongly of
designating you as his successor.</q> </p>
</div><div n="17" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">For the future, Antony, I conjure you by the gods who preside over
friendship, and by Caesar himself, to change somewhat the measures
that have been adopted, for you can change them if you wish to; if not, that
you will hereafter aid and cooperate with me in punishing the murderers,
with the help of the people and of those who are still my father’s faithful
friends. If you still have regard for the conspirators and the Senate, do
not be hard on us. So much for that. You know about my private affairs and
the expense I must incur for the legacy which my father directed to be given
to the people, and the haste involved in it lest I may seem churlish by
reason of delay, and lest those who have been assigned to colonies be
compelled to remain in the city and waste their time on my account. Of
Caesar’s movables, that were brought immediately after the murder
from his house to yours as a safer place, I beg you to take keepsakes and
anything else by way of ornament and whatever you like to retain from us.
But in order that I may pay the legacy to the people, please give me the
gold coin that Caesar had collected for his intended wars. That
will suffice for the distribution to 300,000 men now. For the rest of my
expenses I may perhaps borrow from you, if I may be so bold, or from the
public treasury on your security, if you will give it, and I will offer my
own property for sale at once.</q> </p>
</div><div n="18" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While Octavius was speaking in this fashion Antony was astonished at his
freedom of speech and his boldness, which seemed much beyond the bounds of
propriety and of his years. He was offended by the words because they were
wanting in the respect due to him, and still more by the demand for money,
and, accordingly, he replied in the severe terms following: <q rend="double">Young man, if
Caesar left you the government, together with the inheritance and
his name, it is proper for you to ask and for me to give the reasons for my
public acts. But if the Roman people never surrendered the government to
anybody to dispose of in succession, not even when they had kings, whom they
expelled and swore never to have any more (this was the very charge that the
murderers brought against your father, saying that they killed him because
he was no longer leading but reigning), then there is no need of my
answering you as to my public acts. For the same reason I release you from
any indebtedness to me in the way of gratitude for those acts. They were
performed not as a favor to you, but to the people, except in one
particular, which was of the greatest importance to Caesar and to
yourself. For if, to secure my own safety and to shield myself from enmity,
I had allowed honors to be voted to the murderers as tyrannicides,
Caesar would have been declared a tyrant, to whom neither glory,
nor any kind of honor, nor confirmation of his acts would have been
possible; who could make no valid will, have no son, nor any burial of his
body, even as a private citizen. The laws provide that the bodies of tyrants
shall be cast out unburied, their memory stigmatized, and their property
confiscated.</q> </p>
</div><div n="19" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">Apprehending all of these consequences, I entered the lists for
Caesar, for his immortal honor, and his public funeral, not without
danger, not without incurring hatred to myself, contending against
hot-headed, blood-thirsty men, who, as you know, had already conspired to
kill me; and against the Senate, which was displeased with your father on
account of his usurped authority. But I willingly chose to incur these
dangers and to suffer anything rather than allow Caesar to remain
unburied and dishonored — the most valiant man of his time, the most
fortunate in every respect, and the one to whom the highest honors were due
from me. It is by reason of the dangers I incurred that you enjoy your
present distinction as the successor of Caesar, his family, his
name, his dignity, his wealth. It was more becoming in you to testify your
gratitude to me for these things than to reproach me for concessions made to
soothe the Senate, or in compensation for what I demanded of it, or in
pursuance of other needs or reasons — you a younger man addressing an older
one. But enough of that. You hint that I am ambitious of the leadership. I
am not ambitious of it, although I do not consider myself unworthy of it.
You think that I am distressed because I was not mentioned in
Caesar’s will, though you agree with me that the family of the
Heraclidae is enough to content one.</q> </p>
</div><div n="20" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">As to your pecuniary needs and your wishing to borrow from the public funds,
I should think you must be joking, unless we might believe that you are
still ignorant of the fact that the public treasury was left empty by your
father. After he assumed the government the public revenues were brought to
him instead of to the treasury, and they will presently be found among
Caesar’s assets when we vote an investigation into these matters.
This will not be unjust to Caesar now that he is dead, nor would he
say that it was unjust if he were living and were asked for the accounts.
And as there will be many private persons to dispute with you concerning
single pieces of property, you may assume that this portion will not be
uncontested. The money transferred to my house was not so large a sum as you
conjecture, nor is any part of it in my custody now. The men in power and
authority, except Dolabella and my brothers, divided up the whole of it
straightway as the property of a tyrant, but were brought around by me to
support the decrees in favor of Caesar,<note resp="translator">The truth was that Antony paid his own debts with
Caesar’s money. So Cicero tells us in the second Philippic. <q rend="double">
Where,</q> he asks, <q rend="double">are the seven hundred million sesterces that were
registered at the temple of Ops? His money was indeed a cause for
mourning, yet if it was not to be returned to the rightful owners it
might relieve us from taxes. But you owed four million sesterces on the
Ides of March. How did it happen that you were free from debt on the
Kalends of April?</q> (<title>Phil.</title> ii. 37.)</note> and you, if you
are wise, when you get possession of the remainder, will distribute it among
those who are disaffected toward you rather than among the people. The
former, if they are in harmony with you,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἂν συμφρονῶσι</foreign>: to which
Schweighäuser adds <foreign xml:lang="grc">σοι.</foreign> All the
codices except one read <foreign xml:lang="grc">σωφρονῶσι,</foreign>
<emph>i.e.,</emph> <q rend="double">if they are wise.</q> The Teubner edition
adheres to the latter reading; the Didot to the former. I have preferred
the former because it gives point to Antony’s advice. It furnishes a
reason why Octavius should use his money in one way rather than in the
other. It would enable him to get rid of his expensive allies.</note>
will send the people, who are to be colonized, away to their settlements.
The people, however, as you ought to have learned from the Greek studies you
have been lately pursuing, are as unstable as the waves of the sea, now
advancing, now retreating. In like manner, among us also, the people are
forever exalting their favorites, and casting them down again.</q></p>
</div></div>
 <div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER III</head>
<head>Disagreement between Antony and Octavius — Litigation over
Caesar’s Estate — Growing Popularity of Octavius — Dolabella
proceeds to Syria — Antony schemes to get Command of the Army in
Macedonia — Dolabella puts Trebonius to Death</head>
<div n="21" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Feeling outraged by the many insulting things said by Antony, Octavius went
away, invoking his father repeatedly by name, and offered for sale all the
property which had come to him by the inheritance, at the same time
exhorting the people to stand by him. While this hasty action made manifest
Antony’s enmity toward him, and the Senate voted an immediate investigation
of the public accounts, most of them grew apprehensive of the young
Caesar’<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">οἱ πολλοὶ ἔδεισαν περὶ τῷ νέῳ
Καίσαρι.</foreign> The word <foreign xml:lang="grc">περί</foreign>
implies that they feared <emph>for</emph> him,
<emph>i.e.,</emph> lest some harm should befall him, but as
Schweighäuser points out, this idea is not consistent with what
follows. A few lines below we read that they were most apprehensive of
Antony, <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπὶ δὲ Ἀντωνίῳ.</foreign>
Accordingly he (S.) thinks we are justified in reading <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπί</foreign> in both places, although all the
codices read <foreign xml:lang="grc">περί.</foreign></note> on account of
the favor in which his father was held by the soldiers and the plebeians,
and on account of his own present popularity based on the expected
distribution of the money, and by reason of the wealth which had fallen to
him in such vast measure that in the opinion of many he would not restrict
himself to the rank of a private citizen. But they were most apprehensive of
Antony, lest he should bring the young Caesar, distinguished and
rich as he was, under his own control, and grasp the sovereignty held by the
elder Caesar. Others were delighted with the present state of
affairs, believing that the two men would come in conflict with each other;
and that the investigation concerning the public money would presently put
an end to the wealth of Octavius, and that the treasury would be filled
thereby because much of the public property would be found in
Caesar’s estate. </p>
</div><div n="22" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In the meantime many persons brought lawsuits against Octavius for the
recovery of landed property, some making one claim and some another,
differing in other respects, but for the most part having this in common,
that it had been confiscated from persons who had been banished or put to
death by the proscription. These suits were brought before Antonius himself
or the other consul, Dolabella. If any were brought before other
magistrates, Octavius was worsted through Antony’s influence, although he
showed by the public records that the purchases had been made by his
father,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">τά τε ὠνήματα τῷ πατρὶ ἐκ τοῦ δημοσίου γενόμενα
ἐπιδεικνύς.</foreign> Schweighäuser, being of the opinion
that the words <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐκ τοῦ δημοσίου</foreign> meant
<q rend="double">at the public expense,</q> conceived that the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">οὐκ</foreign> had been accidentally omitted,
<emph>i.e.,</emph> Octavius showed that the purchases had been
made by his father <emph>not</emph> with public money.
Mendelssohn, with better reason, thinks that they mean <q rend="double">by the public
scribe.</q> He thinks also that <foreign xml:lang="grc">τὰ
ὠνήματα</foreign> may possibly signify title deeds,
<foreign xml:lang="lat">emptionis instrumenta.</foreign></note> and that the last
decree of the Senate had confirmed all of Caesar’s acts. Great
wrongs were done him in these judgments, and the losses in consequence
thereof were going on without end, until Pedius and Pinarius, who had a
certain portion of the inheritance under Caesar’s will, complained
to Antony, both for themselves and for Octavius, that they were suffering
injustice in violation of the Senate’s decree. They thought that he ought to
annul only the things done in derogation of Caesar, and to ratify
all that had been done by him. Antony acknowledged that his course was
perhaps somewhat contrary to the agreements voted. The decrees also, he
said, had been recorded in a sense different from the understanding at the
time. While hastily passing a mere decree of amnesty, it had been registered
that whatever had been previously determined on should stand unrepealed, not
for its own sake, not because it was satisfactory in all respects, but
rather to promote good order and to quiet the people, who had been thrown
into tumult by these events. It would be more just, he added, to observe the
spirit than the letter of the decree, and not to make an unseemly opposition
to so many men who had lost their own and their ancestors’ property in the
civil convulsions, and to do this in favor of a young man who had received
an amount of other people’s wealth disproportionate to a private station and
beyond his hopes, and who was not making good use of his fortune, but
employing it in the rashest adventures. He would take care of them (Pedius
and Pinarius) after their portion should have been separated from that of
Octavius. This was the answer made by Antony to Pedius and Pinarius. So they
took their portion immediately, in order not to lose their own share by the
lawsuits, and they did this not so much on their own account as on that of
Octavius, for they were going to bestow the whole of it upon him soon
afterward. </p>
</div><div n="23" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The games were now approaching, which Gaius Antonius, the brother of Antony,
was about to give in behalf of Brutus, the praetor, as he attended
also to the other duties of the praetorship which devolved on him
in the latter’s absence. Lavish expense was incurred in the preparations for
them, in the hope that the people, gratified by the spectacle, would recall
Brutus and Cassius. Octavius, on the other hand, intrigued against this
scheme, distributing the money derived from the sale of his property among
the head men of the tribes by turns, to be divided by them among the first
comers. He went around to the places where his property was on sale and
ordered the auctioneers to announce the lowest possible price for
everything, both on account of the uncertainty and danger of the lawsuits
still pending, and on account of his own zeal for the people,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">διὰ τὴν
Καίσαρος σπουδήν</foreign>: this may possibly mean <q rend="double">on account of
his own haste,</q> <emph>i.e.,</emph> his own need of money.</note>
all of which brought him both popularity and sympathy as one undeserving of
such treatment. When, in addition to what he had received as
Caesar’s heir, he offered for sale his own property derived from
his father Octavius, and whatever he had from other sources, and all that
belonged to his mother and to Philippus, and the shares of Pedius and
Pinarius which he begged from them, in order to make the distribution to the
people (because in consequence of the litigation Caesar’s property
was not sufficient even for this purpose), then the people considered it no
longer the gift of the elder Caesar, but of the younger one, and
they commiserated him deeply and praised him<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ δῆμος . . . ἠλέει καὶ
ἐπῄνουν.</foreign> Combes-Dounous calls attention to this
sentence as a case where a noun in the singular number governs a verb in
the singular and another in the plural in the same sentence, as though
we should say in English <q rend="double">the people pities and praise him.</q></note> both
for what he endured and for what he aspired to be. It was evident that they
would not long tolerate the wrong that Antony was doing him. </p>
</div><div n="24" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>They showed their feelings clearly while Brutus’ games were in progress,
lavish as these were. Although a certain number, who had been hired for the
purpose, shouted that Brutus and Cassius should be recalled, and the rest of
the spectators were thus wrought up to a feeling of pity for them, crowds
ran in and stopped the games until the demand for their recall ceased. When
Brutus and Cassius learned that Octavius had frustrated what they had hoped
to obtain from the games, they decided to go to Syria and Macedonia, which
had been theirs before these provinces were voted to Dolabella and Antony,
and to seize them by force. When their intentions became known, Dolabella
hastened to Syria, taking the province of Asia in his way in order to
collect money there. Antony, thinking that he should soon need troops for
his own purposes, conceived the idea of transferring to himself the army in
Macedonia, which was composed of the very best material and was of large
size (it consisted of six legions, besides a great number of archers and
light-armed troops, much cavalry, and a corresponding amount of apparatus of
all kinds), although it properly belonged to Dolabella, who had been
intrusted with Syria and the war against the Parthians, because
Caesar was about to use these forces against the Parthians. Antony
wanted it especially because it was close at hand, and, by crossing the
Adriatic, could be thrown at once into Italy. </p>
</div><div n="25" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Presently a rumor was noised about that the Getae, learning of
Caesar’s death, had made an incursion into Macedonia and were
ravaging it. Antony asked the Senate to give him an army in order to punish
them, saying that this army had been prepared by Caesar to be used
against the Getae before marching against the Parthians, and that
everything was now quiet on the Parthian frontier. The Senate distrusted the
rumor, and sent messengers to make inquiry. Antony, in order to dissipate
their fear and suspicion, proposed a decree that it should not be lawful for
anybody, for any cause whatever, to vote for a dictatorship, or to accept it
if offered. If anybody should disregard any of these provisions, he might be
killed with impunity by anybody who should meet him.<note resp="translator">This action was much earlier in point of time
than it is here represented. Cicero informs us that the law abolishing
the dictatorship was proposed by Antony at the meeting of the Senate in
the temple of Tellus immediately after the assassination.
(<title>Phil.</title> i. I.)</note> Having deceived the Senate<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἑλὼν τοὺς
ἀκούοντας</foreign>: <q rend="double">having captured his hearers.</q></note> chiefly
by this means, and having agreed with the friends of Dolabella to give him
one legion, he was chosen absolute commander of the forces in Macedonia.
Having obtained what he desired, he sent his brother Gaius with haste to
communicate the decree of the Senate to the army. Those who had been sent to
inquire into the rumor came back and reported that they had seen no
Getae in Macedonia, but they added, either truthfully, or because
they were instructed to do so by Antony, that it was feared that they would
make an incursion into Macedonia if the army were withdrawn. </p>
</div><div n="26" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While these things were taking place at Rome, Cassius and Brutus were
collecting troops and money, and Trebonius, who was governor of the province
of Asia, was fortifying his towns for them. When Dolabella arrived,
Trebonius would not admit him to Pergamus or Smyrna, but allowed him, as
consul, to occupy a market-place outside the walls. When the latter attacked
the walls with fury, but accomplished nothing, Trebonius said that he would
be admitted to Ephesus. Dolabella started for Ephesus forthwith, and
Trebonius sent a force to follow him at a certain distance. While these were
observing Dolabella’s march, they were overtaken by night, and, having no
farther suspicions, returned to Smyrna, leaving a few of their number to
follow him. Dolabella laid an ambush for this small number, captured and
killed them, and went back the same night to Smyrna. Finding it unguarded,
he took it by escalade. Trebonius, who was captured in bed, told his captors
to lead the way to Dolabella, saying that he was willing to follow them. One
of the centurions answered him facetiously, <q rend="double">Go where you please, but you
must leave your head behind, for we are ordered to bring your head, not
yourself.</q> With these words the centurion immediately cut off his head, and
early in the morning Dolabella ordered it to be displayed on the
praetor’s chair where Trebonius was accustomed to transact public
business. Since Trebonius had participated in the murder of Caesar
by detaining Antony in conversation at the door of the senate-house while
the others killed him, the soldiers and camp-followers fell upon the rest of
his body with fury and treated it with every kind of indignity. They rolled
his head from one to another in sport along the city pavements like a ball
till it was completely crushed. This was the first of the murderers who was
visited with such punishment.<note resp="translator">Cicero says that Dolabella approached Smyrna in the guise of friendship
for Trebonius, and having got the latter in his power by treachery, <q rend="double">was
not willing to put his captive to death at once, lest, as I think, he
should seem to be too moderate in his victory. After heaping every kind
of insult from his foul mouth on this excellent man he questioned him
under the scourge and torture about the public money — did this for two
days. After cutting his head from his shoulders he commanded that it be
carried on a pike. The rest of his body was dragged about, mangled, and
cast into the sea.</q> (<title>Phil.</title> xi. 2.)</note></p>
</div></div>
 <div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER IV</head>
<head>Antony brings the Macedonian Army to Italy — Growing Rivalry between
Antony and Octavius—The Military Tribunes intervene between
them—Antony obtains Cisalpine Gaul from the People with Octavius’
Help</head>
<div n="27" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Antony conceived the idea of bringing his army from Macedonia to Italy; and
being in want of any other pretext for this step he asked the Senate to let
him exchange the province of Macedonia for that of Cisalpine Gaul, which was
under the command of Decimus Brutus Albinus. He remembered that
Caesar had marched from the latter province when he overthrew
Pompey and he thought that he should appear to be transferring his army to
Gaul and not to Italy. The Senate, which looked upon Cisalpine Gaul as its
own fortress, was angry, and now for the first time perceived the stratagem
and repented having given him Macedonia. The principal members sent word
privately to Decimus to keep a strong hold on his province, and to raise
additional troops and money lest he should be overpowered by Antony, so much
did they fear and hate the latter. Antony then bethought him to ask the
people, instead of the Senate, for this province by a law, in the same
manner that Caesar had obtained it at a former time and Dolabella
had recently obtained Syria. In order to intimidate the Senate he ordered
his brother, Gaius, to bring his army across the Adriatic to Brundusium; and
the latter proceeded to do as he was directed. </p>
</div><div n="28" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>This was the time for the games that the aedile Critonius was about
to exhibit, and Octavius made preparations to display his father’s gilded
throne and crown, which the Senate had voted should be placed in front for
him at all games. When Critonius said that he could not allow
Caesar to be honored in this way at games given at his expense,
Octavius brought him before Antony as consul. Antony said he would refer the
matter to the Senate. Octavius was vexed and said, <q rend="double">Refer it; I will place
the throne there as long as the decree is in force.</q> Antony was angry and
prohibited it. He prohibited it still more unreasonably in the next games
given by Octavius himself, which had been instituted by his father in honor
of Venus Genetrix when he dedicated a temple to her in a forum, together
with the forum itself. It was evident that universal hatred of Antony had
already grown out of this affair, since he seemed to be moved not so much by
a feeling of rivalry toward the younger Caesar as by an ungrateful
purpose to insult the memory of the elder one. Octavius himself, with a
crowd of people like a body-guard, moved about among the plebeians and those
who had received benefits from his father, or had served under him in war,
stirring their anger and beseeching them not to despise him, the victim of
so many and so great outrages, nor willingly desert him, but to defend
Caesar, their commander and benefactor, dishonored by Antony; to
defend him for their own sakes, because they would never be secure in what
they had received from Caesar unless the decrees passed in his
honor should remain in full force. He exclaimed against Antony everywhere
throughout the city, and especially from the high places that he came to,
saying, <q rend="double">O Antony, do not be angry with Caesar on my account. Do
not insult one who has been the greatest benefactor to you. Heap indignities
on me to your heart’s content. Cease plundering his property until the
legacy to the citizens is paid; then take all the rest. However poor I may
be, my father’s glory, if that remains, and the distribution to the people,
if you will allow it to be made, will be all-sufficient for me.</q> </p>
</div><div n="29" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Henceforth there were open and repeated outcries against Antony on all sides.
The latter indulged in severer threats against Octavius, and when they
became known the people were still more incensed against him. The tribunes
of Antony’s guard, who had served under the elder Caesar, and who
were then in the highest favor with Antony, urged him to refrain from
insult, both on their account and on his own, as he had served under
Caesar and had obtained his present good fortune at
Caesar’s hands. Antony, recognizing the truth of these words, and
feeling a sense of shame before those who uttered them and needing some help
from Octavius himself, with the people, to procure the exchange of
provinces, agreed with what they said and swore that what he had done had
been quite contrary to his intention, but that he had been compelled to
change his purpose because the young man was inordinately puffed up, being
still a youth and showing no respect for his elders and no honor for those
in authority. Although for his own benefit the young man still needed
reproof, yet in deference to their remonstrances he would restrain his anger
and return to his former disposition and intention if Octavius, also, would
curb his presumption. </p>
</div><div n="30" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The tribunes were delighted with this reply and they brought Antony and
Octavius together, who, after some mutual chiding, formed an alliance. The
law concerning Cisalpine Gaul was proposed at once to the great dismay of
the senators. They intended, if Antony should first bring the law before
them, to reject it, and if he should bring it before the popular assembly
without consulting them, to have the tribunes of the people veto it. There
were some who advised that this province be made free altogether, so much
was it dreaded on account of its nearness. Antony, on the other hand,
accused them of intrusting it to Decimus because he had been one of
Caesar’s murderers and of having no confidence in himself because
he had not joined in killing the man who had subdued the province and
brought it to its knees<note resp="translator">There is
some confusion here. Caesar did not subdue Cisalpine
Gaul.</note> — throwing out these insinuations openly against all of
his opponents, as persons who rejoiced over the assassination. When the day
for the comitia came the Senate desired that the votes should be taken by
centuries, but the Antonians, who had enclosed the forum with a rope during
the night, demanded that the votes be taken by tribes according to a plan
they had agreed upon.<note resp="translator">This
passage presents difficulties. In the first place, the reading of all
the codices is that Antony wanted the votes to be taken by centuries and
not by tribes, whereas that plan would have defeated him, since a law
could not be brought before the <foreign xml:lang="lat">comitia centuriata</foreign>
without the previous approval of the Senate. Moreover, the
<foreign xml:lang="lat">comitia centuriata</foreign> were not held in the forum.
Schweighäuser accordingly transposes the words <q rend="double">centuries</q> and
<q rend="double">tribes,</q> and this change is adopted in the Teubner text.</note>
Although the plebeians were incensed against Antony they nevertheless
coöperated with him for the sake of Octavius, who stood alongside
the rope and begged them to do so. He did this in order that Decimus, who
had been one of his father’s murderers, might not have the government of a
province so convenient, and of the army belonging to it, and, moreover, to
gratify Antony, who was now in league with him. He expected also to get some
assistance from Antony in return. The tribunes had been corrupted with money
by Antony and remained silent. So the law was passed and Antony now with
plausible reason brought his army across the Adriatic.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER V</head>
<head>Antony again opposes Octavius — The Tribunes intervene again— Antony
replies to them</head>
<div n="31" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>One of the tribunes of the people having died Octavius favored the election
of Flaminius as his successor. The people thought that he was ambitious of
this office for himself, but that he refrained from being a candidate
because he was under age, and, accordingly, they proposed to cast their
votes for him for tribune. The Senate begrudged him this increase of power,
fearing lest, as tribune, he should bring the murderers of his father before
the popular assembly for trial. Antony, in disregard of his recent alliance
with Octavius, either to curry favor with the Senate, or to appease its
dissatisfaction with the law respecting Cisalpine Gaul, or for private
reasons, gave public notice, as consul, that Octavius should not solicit
votes contrary to law; and that if he should do so he (Antony) would use
every means in his power against him. As this edict was an act of
ingratitude toward Octavius, and was insulting both to him and to the
people, the latter were extremely angry and took steps to defeat Antony’s
wishes in the election, so that he became alarmed and annulled the comitia,
saying that the remaining number of tribunes was sufficient. Octavius, thus
at last openly attacked, sent numerous agents to the towns colonized by his
father to tell how he had been treated and to learn the state of feeling in
each. He also sent certain persons in the guise of traders into Antony’s
camp to mingle with the soldiers, to work upon the boldest of them, and
secretly distribute handbills among the rank and file. </p>
</div><div n="32" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While Octavius was doing this the military tribunes again sought an audience
with Antony and addressed him thus: <q rend="double">We, O Antony, and the others who served
with you under Caesar, established his rule and continued to
maintain it from day to day as its faithful supporters. We know how his
murderers hate and conspire against us and how the Senate favors them. But
after the people drove them out we took fresh courage seeing that
Caesar’s acts were not altogether without friends, were not
forgotten, were not unappreciated. For our future security we put our trust
in you, the friend of Caesar, after him the most experienced of all
as a commander, our present leader, and the one most fit to be such. Our
enemies are starting up afresh. They have boldly seized Syria and
Macedonia<note resp="translator">Combes-Dounous
points out that Brutus and Cassius had not gone to Syria and Macedonia
at this time. Brutus was in a ship at the mouth of the river Heles,
three miles from the town of Velia in Lucania, as we learn from one of
Cicero’s letters (<title>Ad Att.</title> xvi. 7).</note> and are raising
money and troops against us. The Senate is stirring up Decimus Brutus
against you. Yet you are wasting your powers of mind in a disagreement with
the young Caesar. We naturally fear lest there be added to the war,
which has not yet broken out but is imminent, dissensions among you, which
shall accomplish all that our enemies desire against us. We beseech you to
consider these things for the sake of piety toward Caesar and care
for us, who have never given you cause for complaint, and for your own
interest even more than ours. Help Octavius as much as you can, or at all
events as much as may be needful, to punish the murderers. Then you will
enjoy your power without anxiety and will provide security for us, who are
now apprehensive both for ourselves and for you.</q> </p>
</div><div n="33" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>To the tribunes who had thus spoken Antony made the following reply: <q rend="double">What
friendship and zeal I had for Caesar while he lived, what dangers I
braved in his service, you, who have been my fellow-soldiers and the sharers
in those events, know full well. What favors he showed me, what honors he
continually bestowed upon me, it does not become me to say. The murderers,
too, were acquainted with these facts. They conspired to kill me with
Caesar because they knew that if I were living they could not
compass their designs. Whoever dissuaded them from that purpose did so not
from regard for my safety, but to preserve the appearance of tyrannicide, so
that they might not seem to be killing a number of persons as enemies, but
only one as a despot. Who, then, will believe that I have no care for
Caesar, who was my benefactor, that I prefer his enemies, and that
I willingly condone his murder at the hands of those who conspired against
me also, as the young Caesar imagines? Whence came their amnesty,
whence their preferment? For he wishes to charge these things upon me
instead of the Senate. Learn from me how they came about.</q> </p>
</div><div n="34" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">When Caesar was suddenly slain in the senate-house fear fell upon
me most of all by reason of my friendship for him and my ignorance of the
facts, as I knew not the particulars of the conspiracy nor against whom it
was designed. The people were terror-stricken. The murderers with their
gladiators took possession of the Capitol and shut themselves up in it. The
Senate was on their side, just as it now is more openly, and was about to
vote rewards to them as tyrannicides. If Caesar were declared a
tyrant then might we all have perished as the friends of a tyrant. In the
midst of such confusion, anxiety, and fear, when it would not have been
surprising if I had been at a loss what to do, you will find, if you
examine, that where courage was needed I was boldest and where artifice was
required I was most crafty. The first thing to be done, because it embraced
everything else, was to prevent the voting of rewards to the conspirators.
This I accomplished against the strong opposition of the Senate and of the
murderers, with unfailing courage and in the face of danger, because I then
believed that we of Caesar’s party could be safe only in case
Caesar were not declared a tyrant. But when I saw our enemies, and
the Senate itself, plunged in the same fear (lest, if Caesar were
not decreed a tyrant, they themselves should be convicted of murder), and
making their fight, for this reason, I yielded and granted amnesty instead
of rewards to the murderers, in order to gain what I wanted in exchange.
What did I want and how important was it? That Caesar’s name should
not be blotted out was the dearest wish of all to me, that his property
should not be confiscated, that the adoption on which this young man prides
himself should not be annulled, that the will should not be declared
invalid, that his body should have a royal funeral, that the immortal honors
previously decreed to him should be fulfilled, that all his acts should be
confirmed, and that his son, and we his friends, both generals and soldiers,
should remain in perfect safety and enjoy a life of honor instead of
ignominy.</q> </p>
</div><div n="35" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">Think you that I asked few or small things from the Senate in exchange for
the amnesty, or that the Senate would have made these concessions without
the amnesty? If this exchange had been made in all sincerity it would have
been a fair bargain to actually spare the murderers for the sake of
Caesar’s immortal glory and our complete security, but in fact I
did it not with that intention, but in order to gain time.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀλλ’
ἀνατιθέμενος τὴν δίκην,</foreign> literally, <q rend="double">postponing their
punishment.</q></note> Accordingly, as soon as I had obtained what I wanted
from the Senate, and the murderers were freed from anxiety, I took fresh
courage and undermined the amnesty, not by votes, not by decrees (for that
was impossible), but by working on the people imperceptibly. I brought
Caesar’s body into the forum under pretence of burial, I laid bare
his wounds, I showed the number of them and his clothing all bloody and
slashed by the knives. In public speech I dwelt on his bravery and his
services to the common people in pathetic terms, weeping for him as slain
and invoking him as a god. These acts and words of mine stirred up the
people, kindled a fire in spite of the amnesty, sent them against the houses
of our enemies, and drove the murderers from the city. How much the Senate
was thwarted and grieved by this was presently shown when they blamed me for
exciting the people and sent the murderers away to take command of
provinces, Brutus and Cassius to Syria and Macedonia, which were provided
with great armies, telling them to hasten before the appointed time, under
pretence of looking after the corn supply.<note resp="translator">It has already been shown that this is inexact as to
time.</note> And now another and still greater fear took possession of
me (as I had no military force of my own anywhere), lest we should be
exposed without arms to the assaults of so many armed men. I suspected my
colleague also because he was always at variance with me. He had pretended
to be in the conspiracy against Caesar and he had proposed that the
day of the murder should be celebrated as the birthday of the republic.</q> </p>
</div><div n="36" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">While I was at a loss what to do, desiring to disarm our enemies and to arm
ourselves instead, I put Amatius to death and recalled Sextus Pompeius in
order to entrap the Senate again and bring it over to my side. But as even
then I had no confidence in it I persuaded Dolabella to ask for the province
of Syria, not from the Senate, but from the people by a law, and I favored
his petition so that he should become an enemy instead of a friend of the
murderers, and so that the senators should be ashamed to refuse me Macedonia
afterwards. Still, the Senate would not have assigned Macedonia to me, even
after Dolabella had been provided for, by reason of the army belonging to
it, if I had not previously transferred the army to Dolabella, as the war
against the Parthians fell to the lot of the one governing Syria. But they
would not have taken Macedonia and Syria away from Brutus and Cassius unless
other provinces had been obtained for them to ensure their safety. When it
became necessary to make them a recompense, look at the <foreign xml:lang="lat">quid pro
quo</foreign> that was given to them — Cyrene and Crete, devoid of
troops, provinces which even our enemies despise as not sufficient for their
safety; and they are now trying to seize by force those that were taken from
them. Thus in fact was the army transferred from our enemies to Dolabella by
artifice, by stratagem, by exchange; for when there was no way to gain our
end openly by arms we had necessarily to have recourse to the laws.</q> </p>
</div><div n="37" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">After these events our enemies had raised another army and it became needful
for me to have the one in Macedonia; but I was in want of a pretext. A rumor
gained currency that the Getae were ravaging Macedonia. This was
disbelieved, and while messengers were sent to make inquiry I brought
forward the decree about the dictatorship, providing that it should not be
lawful to speak of it, to vote for it, or to accept it if offered. The
senators were particularly taken with this proposal and they gave me the
army. Then for the first time I considered myself on an equality with my
enemies, not merely with the open ones [as Octavius thinks],<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ὡς οἴεται
Καῖσαρ.</foreign> I have placed these words in brackets because
they have no relevancy to the context. Nauck thinks they should be
erased.</note> but with the more numerous and powerful ones who still
choose to remain secret. When I had accomplished these plans there remained
one of the murderers on my flank, Decimus Brutus, who governed a
conveniently placed province with a large army, whom I, knowing him to be
bolder than the rest, have deprived of Cisalpine Gaul, by promising, in
order to keep up appearances with the Senate, to give him in exchange
Macedonia,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐς εὐπρέπειαν ἔτι τῆς βουλῆς Μακεδονίαν
ὑπισχνούμενος ἀντιδώσειν.</foreign> These words are troublesome.
The substitution of <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπί</foreign> for <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἔτι</foreign> was suggested by Musgrave, and this
change has been followed in the translation.</note> when it has lost its
army. The Senate was indignant, for it now perceived the stratagem, and you
know what kind of letters, and how many, they are writing to Decimus, and
how they are inciting my successors in the consulship. I decided to take a
bolder course and ask the people for this province by a law, instead of
asking the Senate, and I brought my army from Macedonia to Brundusium so
that I might use it in emergencies. And, with the help of the gods, we will
use it as may be needful.</q> </p>
</div><div n="38" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">Thus have we changed from the great fear that formerly beset us to a state
of entire safety for ourselves, where we can boldly face our foes. When
these facts became known the multitude showed their zeal against our
enemies. You see how the latter regret the decrees that have been passed and
what a fight they are making to deprive me of the Gallic province which has
already been given to me. You know what they have written to Decimus and how
they are urging my successors in the consulship to get the law relating to
this province changed. But with the help of our country’s gods, and with
pious intent, and by means of your valor, with which Caesar also
conquered, we will avenge him, devoting to that purpose our powers of body
and of mind.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">τῷ τε σώματι ἐπεξιόντες, καὶ τῇ γνώμῃ
βοηθοῦντες,</foreign> <q rend="double">attacking with the body and helping with the
mind.</q> Nauck would erase the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">βοηθοῦντες.</foreign> It would certainly not be missed.</note>
While these events were in progress, fellow-soldiers, I preferred that they
should not be talked of; now that they are accomplished I have laid them
before you, whom I shall make the sharers of my deeds and my counsels in
every particular hereafter. Communicate to others, if there are any, who do
not see them in the same light — excepting only Octavius, who behaves
ungratefully toward us.</q><note resp="translator">That
this speech was composed by Appian and put in the mouth of Antony there
is little room to doubt. It contains errors as to dates and as to the
order of events which Antony could not have made.</note></p>
</div></div>
 <div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VI</head>
<head>Octavius accused of attempting to assassinate Antony — He denies the
Accusation — Octavius obtains Soldiers in Calatia and Casilinum — The
Tribune Canutius sides with Octavius against Antony — Octavius declares
his Readiness to fight Antony — Caesar’s Veterans refuse to
fight against Antony</head>
<div n="39" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>These words of Antony convinced the tribunes that in all he had done he had
been moved by bitter animosity toward the murderers and that he had been
scheming against the Senate. Nevertheless they urged him to come to an
agreement with Octavius; and as both yielded they formed a new alliance in
the Capitol. Not long afterward Antony announced to his friends that some of
his body-guard had been tampered with by Octavius, who had formed a plot
against him. This he said either as a slander, or because he believed it to
be true, or because he had heard of the emissaries of Octavius in his camp
and thought they were actually plotting against his life. When this story
was noised about there was a general tumult forthwith and great indignation,
for there were few who had sufficient penetration to see that it was for the
interest of Octavius that Antony, even though he were unjust to him, should
live, because he (Antony) was a terror to the murderers. If he were dead
they would quite fearlessly dare anything, especially as they had the
support of the Senate. The more intelligent knew this, but the greater part,
seeing what Octavius suffered daily from the indignities and the losses
inflicted on him, considered the accusation not incredible, yet held it to
be impious and intolerable that a conspiracy should be formed against
Antony’s life while he was consul. Octavius ran with mad fury to those who
held this opinion of him, exclaiming that it was Antony that had conspired
against him to alienate from him the friendship of the people, which was the
only thing left to him. He ran to Antony’s door and repeated the same
things, calling the gods to witness, taking all kinds of oaths, and inviting
Antony to a judicial investigation. As nobody came forward he said, <q rend="double">I will
accept your friends as judges.</q> With these words he attempted to enter the
house. Being prevented from doing so he again cried out and railed at Antony
and vented his wrath against the doorkeepers who restrained him from having
a dispute with Antony. Then he went away and called the people to witness
that if anything should happen to him his death would be due to Antony’s
plots. As these words were spoken with deep feeling the multitude underwent
a change, and a kind of penitence took the place of their former opinion.
There were some who still doubted, and hesitated to put faith in either of
them. Some accused them both of making false pretences, believing that they
had come to an agreement in the temple, and that these were plots devised
against their enemies. Still others thought that this was a device of Antony
to increase his body-guard. or to alienate the veterans from Octavius.<note resp="translator">Cicero refers in one of his
letters to the attempt of Octavius to assassinate Antony. He says that
the charge was considered by the populace a mere fiction on the part of
Antony to serve as an excuse for seizing the young man’s property, but
that the better and more discerning citizens believed the report and
highly approved of it; also that Antony was so generally detested that
although he had caught the assassins in his house he dared not make the
affair public. (<title>Ad Fam.</title> xii. 23.) Suetonius says: <q rend="double">At the
instigation of some of his friends he (Octavius) hired assassins to kill
him (Antony), but as the plot was discovered and he apprehended similar
danger to himself, he drew over the veteran troops to his own service
and that of the republic by as large a bribe as he could procure.</q> 
(<title>Aug.</title> 10.) Suetonius makes this affair take place
while Antony was besieging Decimus Brutus in Mutina, whereas it must
have been considerably earlier. Plutarch says merely that <q rend="double">a rumor prevailed that Octavius had formed a plot against Antony.</q> (<title>Ant.</title> 16.)</note> </p> </div>
<div n="40" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Presently news was brought to Octavius by his secret emissaries that the army
at Brundusium and the colonized soldiers were incensed against Antony for
neglecting to avenge the murder of Caesar, and that they would
assist him (Octavius) to do so if they could. For this reason Antony
departed to Brundusium. As Octavius feared lest Antony, returning with the
army, should catch him unprotected he went to Campania with money to enlist
the veterans who had been colonized in those towns by his father. He first
brought over those of Calatia and next those of Casilinum, two towns
situated on either side of Capua, giving 500 drachmas to each man. He
collected about 10,000 men, not fully armed and not mustered in regular
cohorts, but serving merely as a body-guard under one banner<note resp="translator">Cicero, who was, at this time, at
or near Naples, gives an account of this mustering of forces by Octavius
at Calatia and Casilinum in letters to Atticus (xvi. 8, 9). Cicero was
thrown into trepidation by this movement and also by the approach of
Antony, who was marching from Brundusium to Rome with one legion known
as the Alaudae (the Larks), that had been raised by
Caesar in Transalpine Gaul. He says that Octavius desired to
have a secret interview with him at Capua or in the vicinity, which
Cicero declined. Then Octavius sent a messenger to him who asked his
advice whether he had best march to Rome with 3000 of his soldiers, or
attempt to prevent Antony’s approach, or go and meet the three legions
from Macedonia which were marching northward along the Adriatic coast
and which he believed would join him. Cicero advised him to go to Rome
because he thought the common people would be on his side, and that if
he could gain their support the upper classes would join him also.
Octavius answered that he would follow Cicero’s advice and then urged
him to come to Rome also, saying that he (Octavius) wished to act under
the authority of the Senate. <q rend="double">I try to excuse myself,</q> says Cicero. <q rend="double">I
cannot trust his youth, I do not know his real intentions. . . . I am
afraid of Antony’s power and unwilling to leave the coast, and at the
same time should be sorry to be absent in any crisis.</q> He wants Atticus
to advise him what to do. Velleius (ii. 61) mentions the enlistment of
these veterans at Calatia and Casilinum.</note> The citizens of Rome
were alarmed at the approach of Antony with an army, and when they learned
that Octavius was advancing with another one some were doubly alarmed, while
others were well pleased, believing that they could make use of Octavius
against Antony. Still others, who had seen them reconciled to each other in
the Capitol, considered these transactions a game of false pretences by
which Antony was to have the supreme power and Octavius was to wreak
vengeance on the murderers in return therefor. </p>
</div><div n="41" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In this time of consternation Canutius, a tribune of the people and enemy of
Antony, and hence friendly to Octavius, went to meet the latter. Having
learned his intentions Canutius addressed the people, saying that Octavius
was advancing with real hostility to Antony and that those who were afraid
that Antony was aiming at tyranny should side with Octavius as they had no
other army at present. After speaking thus he brought in Octavius, who was
encamped before the city at the temple of Mars, fifteen stades distant. When
the latter arrived he proceeded to the temple of Castor and Pollux, which
his soldiers surrounded carrying concealed daggers. Canutius addressed the
people first, speaking against Antony. Octavius also reminded them of his
father and of what he had himself suffered at the hands of Antony, on
account of which he had enlisted this army as a guard for himself. He
declared himself the obedient servant of his country in all things, and said
that he was ready to confront Antony in the present emergency.<note resp="translator">Velleius (ii. 64) says that both
Cicero and Canutius suffered death for their defence of liberty; <q rend="double">that
the proscription began with the blood of the tribune and ended with that
of Cicero as though even Antony were now satisfied.</q> On the other hand,
Dion Cassius says that Canutius was captured by Octavius at Perusia and
put to death nearly three years later (xlviii. 14). Appian confirms this
(v. 49 <emph>infra</emph>).</note>
</p>
</div><div n="42" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After he had thus spoken and the assembly had been dissolved, the soldiers,
taking the opposite view (that they had come to support the alliance of
Antony and Octavius or as a mere guard for the latter and to punish the
murderers), were vexed at the declaration of war against Antony, who had
been their general and was now consul. Some of them asked leave to return
home in order to arm themselves, saying that they could not perform their
duty with other arms than their own. Others spoke out the truth. As things
had turned out contrary to his expectation, Octavius was at a loss what to
do. Hoping, however, to retain them by persuasion rather than by force he
yielded to their requests, and sent some of them to get their arms and
others simply to their homes. Concealing his disappointment he praised all
of the assembled multitude, gave them new presents, and said that he would
reward them still more generously, for he made use of them for emergencies
rather as the friends of his father than as soldiers. After he had spoken
these words, from 10,000 he influenced 1000 only to remain with him, or
perhaps 3000, for accounts differ as to the number. The rest then took their
departure, but presently they remembered the toils of agriculture and the
gains of military service, the words of Octavius, his compliance with their
wishes, and the favors they had received and hoped still to receive from
him. And so, like the fickle multitude, they repented, and seizing upon
their former pretext for the sake of appearances, they armed themselves and
went back to him. Octavius had already proceeded with new supplies of money
to Ravenna and the neighboring parts, enlisting new forces continually and
sending them all to Arretium.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VII</head>
<head>Mutiny among Antony’s Troops — He punishes them— Octavius excites
Dissension in Antony’s Army —Two of Antony’s Legions desert to Octavius
— Antony departs to Cisalpine Gaul — Octavius offers his Services to
the Senate and they are accepted— Military Manœuvres of
Octavius’ Legions</head>
<div n="43" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In the meantime four of the five Macedonian legions had joined Antony at
Brundusium. They blamed him because he had not proceeded against the
murderers of Caesar. They conducted him without applause to the
platform, implying that they required explanations on this subject first.
Antony was angry at their silence. He did not keep his temper, but charged
them with ingratitude in that they had expressed no thanks for being
transferred from the Parthian expedition to Italy. He blamed them because
they had not arrested and delivered to him the emissaries of a rash boy (for
so he called Octavius) who had been sent among them to stir up discord. But
he would find them out, he said. He would lead the army to the province
voted to him, the fair Gallic country, and would give 100 drachmas to each
man present. They laughed at his parsimony, and when he became angry they
broke out in tumult and went away. Antony rose and departed, saying, <q rend="double">You
shall learn to obey orders.</q> Then he required the military tribunes to bring
before him the fomenters of the sedition (for it is customary in Roman
armies to keep at all times a record of the character of each man). From
these he chose by lot a certain number according to military law, and he put
to death not every tenth man, but a smaller number, thinking to strike
terror into the rest by means of the few. But the others were turned to rage
and hatred instead of fear by this act.<note resp="translator">This execution of soldiers at Brundusium is mentioned by
Cicero in the third Philippic (4), where he says that the number of
soldiers put to death was 300. In the fifth Philippic (8) he gives a
more particular account of the affair, saying: <q rend="double">What did his (Antony’s)
journey to Brundusium mean? Why such haste? What did he hope to do
unless to lead a great army to the city, or rather into the city ? Why
that casting of lots by the centurions and that fierce outbreak of
uncontrollable temper? When our bravest legions exclaimed against his
promises, he commanded those centurions to come to his house whose
strong attachment to the republic he was acquainted with, and there at
his own feet, and at the feet of his wife, whom this austere general
took with him to the army, he caused them to be killed.</q> These soldiers
were clearly mutineers, and Antony did not exceed his authority in
punishing them; but mutiny and <q rend="double">going over to the enemy</q> were so common
at that time that each man measured the turpitude of the act by its
bearings on his own party.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="44" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In view of these facts the men whom Octavius had sent to tamper with the
soldiers distributed the greatest possible number of handbills throughout
the camp, reflecting on Antony’s stinginess and cruelty, recalling the
memory of the elder Caesar and urging them to share the service of
the younger one and his liberal gifts. Antony tried to find these emissaries
by means of rewards to informers and threats against those who abetted them,
but as he caught no one he became angry, believing that the soldiers
concealed them. When the news came of what Octavius was doing among the
colonized veterans and at Rome, he became alarmed, and going before the army
again he said that he was sorry for what he had been compelled by military
discipline to do to a few instead of the much larger number who were
punishable by law, and that they must know very well that Antony was neither
cruel nor stingy. <q rend="double">Let us lay aside ill-will,</q> he continued, <q rend="double">and rest
satisfied with these faults and punishments. The 100 drachmas which I have
ordered to be given you is not my donative, for that would be unworthy of
the fortune of Antony, but rather the salutation of our first meeting than a
full reward, but it is necessary to obey the laws of our country, and of the
army, in this affair<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐς τάδε αὐτῷ</foreign>: words not translatable.
Mendelssohn suggests <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐς τόδε
αὐτὸ.</foreign></note> as in all others.</q> When he had thus spoken he
did not as yet add anything to the donative, that it might not seem that as
general he had yielded anything to the army. Whether moved by penitence or
by fear they took what was given them. Antony, being still angry at the
outbreak, or from some other suspicion, changed their tribunes. The
remainder he treated well because he had need of their services, and he sent
them forward by detachments along the sea-coast toward Ariminum. </p>
</div><div n="45" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Antony chose from the whole number a praetorian cohort of the men
who were best in body and character and marched to Rome, intending to push
on thence toward Ariminum. He entered the city in a haughty manner leaving
his squadron of horse encamped outside the walls. But the troops that
accompanied him were girded as for war, and they mounted guard over his
house at night under arms,<note resp="translator">In the
fifth Philippic (6), which was delivered on the first of January, Cicero
refers to this irruption of armed men in indignant terms: <q rend="double">Will it not
be advertised with the deepest shame, and by the records of our order,
to the memory of posterity, that since the foundation of the city Antony
alone had himself surrounded by armed men within its walls — something
that neither the kings, nor those who sought to exercise royal power
after their expulsion, ever did? I can remember Cinna; I have seen Sulla
and lately Caesar. These three men have been more powerful than
the whole republic at any time since the commonwealth was made free by
Lucius Brutus. I cannot affirm that their satellites were without arms,
but I can say that if they had any they were few and concealed, but a
whole troop of armed men followed this wretch.</q> It detracts somewhat
from the force of these words that for want of an armed guard
Caesar was murdered only a few months before, in the presence
of the very men to whom Cicero was speaking, and that Cicero applauded
the act.</note> and he gave them a countersign and relieved them
regularly, just as in a camp. He convoked the Senate in order to make
complaint of the acts of Octavius, and just as he was entering it he learned
that the so-called Martian legion, one of the four on the road, had gone
over to Octavius. While he was waiting at the entrance cogitating over this
news it was announced to him that another legion, called the Fourth, had
followed the example of the Martian and espoused the side of Octavius.
Disconcerted as he was he entered the senate-house, pretending that he had
convened them about other matters, said a few words, and immediately
departed to the city gates, and thence to the town of Alba,<note resp="translator">Alba was only fifteen miles from
Rome. The Martian legion had halted here and revolted from Antony.
(Cicero, <title>Phil.</title> iii. 3.)</note> in order to persuade the
deserters to come back to him. They shot arrows at him from the walls, and
he retreated. To the other legions he forwarded 500 drachmas per man. With
the soldiers he had with him he marched to Tibur,<note resp="translator">The modern Tivoli.</note> taking the apparatus
customary to those who are going to war; for war was now certain, since
Decimus Brutus had refused to give up Cisalpine Gaul. </p>
</div><div n="46" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While Antony was at Tibur nearly all the Senate, and the greater part of the
knights, and the most influential plebeians, came there to do him
honor.<note resp="translator">In the thirteenth
Philippic (9) Cicero refers to this meeting as <q rend="double">that pestilent
assemblage at Tibur,</q> but he makes it take place before the revolt of
the two legions. In the fifth Philippic (9) he says that when Antony
heard of the revolt of the legions <q rend="double">just after he had convoked the
Senate, and procured a man of consular rank to propose that Octavius be
declared a public enemy, he immediately fainted away.</q> This is doubtful.
Antony was not one of the fainting kind, but Cicero was prone to
exaggeration.</note> These persons, arriving while he was swearing into
his service the soldiers present and also the discharged veterans who had
flocked in (of whom there was a goodly number), voluntarily joined in taking
the oath that they would not fail in friendship and fidelity to Antony; so
that one would have been at a loss to know who were the men who, a little
before, had decried Antony at Octavius’ public meeting. With this brilliant
send-off Antony started for Ariminum, which lies on the border of Cisalpine
Gaul. His army, exclusive of the new levies, consisted of three legions
summoned from Macedonia (for the remainder had now arrived). There were also
some discharged veterans, old men, who appeared nevertheless to be worth
twice as much as the new levies. Thus Antony had four legions of
well-disciplined troops, and the helpers who usually accompanied them,
besides his body-guard and the new levies. Lepidus in Spain with four
legions, Asinius Pollio with two, and Plancus in Transalpine Gaul with
three, seemed likely to espouse the side of Antony. </p>
</div><div n="47" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius had two legions equally efficient, which had deserted from Antony to
him, also one legion of new levies and two of discharged veterans, not
complete in numbers or in arms, but filled up with new recruits. He brought
them all to Alba and there communicated with the Senate, which congratulated
him in such a way that now one would have been at a loss to know who were
those who had lately ranged themselves with Antony; but it regretted that
the legions had not come over to the Senate itself instead of to him. It
praised them and Octavius nevertheless, and said that it would vote them
whatever was needful as soon as the new magistrates should enter upon their
duties. It was plain that the Senate would use these forces against Antony;
but having no army of its own anywhere, and being unable to levy one without
consuls, it adjourned all business until the new consuls should come
in.<note resp="translator">The new consuls were
Hirtius and Pansa. They had been designated in advance by
Caesar and succeeded to the office by virtue of the decree of
the Senate confirming all of Caesar’s acts.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="48" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The soldiers of Octavius furnished him lictors provided with fasces and urged
him to assume the title of propraetor, carrying on war and leading
themselves, since they were always marshalled under magistrates. He thanked
them for the honor, but referred the matter to the Senate. When they wanted
to go before the Senate <emph>en masse</emph> he prevented them and
would not even allow them to send messengers, believing that the Senate
would vote these things to him voluntarily; <q rend="double">and would do this all the
more,</q> he said, <q rend="double">if they know of your zeal and my hesitation.</q> They were
reconciled to this course with difficulty. The leading officers complained
that he disdained them, and he explained to them that the Senate was moved
not so much by good-will toward him as by fear of Antony and the want of an
army; <q rend="double">and that will be the case,</q> he continued, <q rend="double">until we humble Antony,
and until the murderers, who are friends and relatives of the senators,
collect a military force for them. Knowing these facts I falsely pretend to
be serving them. Let us not be the first to expose this false pretence. If
we usurp the office they will accuse us of arrogance and violence, whereas
if we are modest they will probably give it of their own accord, fearing
lest I accept it from you.</q> After he had thus spoken he witnessed some
military exercises of the two legions that had deserted from Antony, who
ranged themselves opposite each other and gave a complete representation of
a battle, except only the killing. Octavius was delighted with the spectacle
and was pleased to make this a pretext for distributing 500 drachmas more to
each man, and he promised that in case of war he would give them 5000
drachmas each if they were victorious. Thus, by means of lavish gifts, did
Octavius bind these mercenaries to himself. Such was the course of events in
Italy. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="8" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VIII</head>
<head>Antony orders Decimus Brutus to withdraw from Cisalpine Gaul — Decimus
retires to Mutina and Antony besieges him there — Cicero urges that
Antony be declared a Public Enemy — The Tribune Salvius interposes in
Favor of Antony — Debate in the Senate — Cicero’s Speech — Piso
speaks in Defence of Antony — The Senate orders Antony to desist from
the Siege of Mutina — Antony’s Reply — The Senate votes him a Public
Enemy — Macedonia voted to Brutus and Syria to Cassius</head>

<div n="49" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In Cisalpine Gaul Antony ordered Decimus Brutus to withdraw to Macedonia in
obedience to the decree of the Roman people, and for his own good. Decimus,
in reply, sent him the letters that had been furnished him by the Senate, as
much as to say that he cared no more for the command of the people than
Antony did for that of the Senate. Antony then fixed a day for his
compliance, after which he should treat him as an enemy. Decimus advised him
to fix a later day lest he (Antony) should too soon make himself an enemy to
the Senate. Although Antony could have easily overcome him, as he was still
in the open country, he decided to proceed first against the cities. These
opened their gates to him. Decimus, fearing lest none of them should be
opened to him, fabricated letters from the Senate calling him to Rome with
his army and retired towards Italy, welcomed by all as he passed along,
until he arrived at the wealthy city of Mutina.<note resp="translator">The modern Modena.</note> Here he closed the
gates and possessed himself of the property of the inhabitants for the
support of his army. He slaughtered and salted all the cattle he could find
there in anticipation of a long siege, and he awaited Antony. His army
consisted of a large number of gladiators and three legions of infantry, one
of which was composed of new recruits as yet inexperienced. The other two
had served under him before and were entirely trustworthy. Antony advanced
against him with fury, drew a line of circumvallation around Mutina, and
laid siege to Decimus. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R.
711</note>
</p>
</div><div n="50" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In Rome, at the beginning of the new year, the consuls, Hirtius and Pansa,
convened the Senate on the subject of Antony immediately after the
sacrifices had been <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0043">43</date></note> performed and in the very temple.
Cicero and his friends urged that Antony be now declared a public enemy,
since he had seized Cisalpine Gaul with an armed force against the will of
the Senate and made of it a point of attack on the republic, and had brought
into Italy an army given to him to operate against the Thracians. They spoke
also of his seeking the supreme power as Caesar’s successor,
because he publicly surrounded himself in the city with such a large body of
armed centurions, and converted his house into a fortress with arms and
countersigns, and had borne himself more haughtily in other respects than
was befitting a yearly magistrate. Lucius Piso, who had charge of Antony’s
interests in his absence, a man among the most illustrious in Rome, and
others who sided with him on his own account, or on Antony’s, or because of
their own opinion, contended that Antony ought to have a trial, that it was
not the custom of their ancestors to condemn a man unheard, that it was not
decent to declare a man an enemy to-day who was a consul yesterday, and
especially one whom Cicero himself as well as the rest had so often lavishly
praised. The Senate, which was about equally divided in opinion, remained in
session till night. Early the next morning it reassembled to consider the
same question and then the party of Cicero was in the majority and Antony
would have been voted a public enemy had not the tribune Salvius adjourned
the sitting to the following day; for among the magistrates the one who has
the veto power always prevails. </p>
</div><div n="51" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The Ciceronians heaped gross reproaches and insults<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ὠνείδιζόν τε καὶ
ἐνύβριζον</foreign>: <q rend="double">heaped reproaches and insults.</q> The first
three of these words are not in any printed text except that of
Mendelssohn, who finds them in the Vatican codex.</note> on Salvius for
this, and sallied out among the plebeians to excite them against him and
summoned him to answer before them. He set forth to obey the summons
undismayed until he was restrained by the Senate, which feared lest he
should change the people around by recalling Antony to their memory; for the
senators well knew that they were condemning an illustrious man without a
trial, and that the people had given him this very Gallic province. But
since they feared for the safety of the murderers they were angry with
Antony because he had made the first movement against them after the
amnesty, for which reason the Senate had previously needed the help of
Octavius against him. Although Octavius knew this he desired nevertheless to
take the lead in humbling Antony. Such were the reasons why the Senate was
angry with Antony. Although the vote on him was adjourned by the command of
the tribune, they passed a decree praising Decimus for not abandoning
Cisalpine Gaul to Antony, and directing Octavius to assist the consuls,
Hirtius and Pansa, with the army he now had. They awarded him a gilded
statue and the right to declare his opinion among the consulars in the
Senate even now, and the right to stand for the consulship itself ten years
before the legal period, and voted from the public treasury to the legions
that deserted from Antony to him the same amount that he had promised to
give them if they should be victorious. After passing these decrees they
adjourned, thinking that Antony would in fact know from the votes taken that
he was declared a public enemy and believing, also, that on the following
day the tribune would no longer interpose his veto. The mother, the wife,
and the son of Antony (who was still a young man), and his other relatives
and friends went around the whole night visiting the houses of influential
men and beseeching them. In the morning they put themselves in the way of
those going to the senate-house, fell at their feet with wailing and
lamentation and in mourning garments, crying out alongside the doors. Some
of the senators were moved by these cries, this spectacle, this so sudden
change of fortune. Cicero, fearing the result, addressed the Senate as
follows: — </p>
</div><div n="52" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double">What decision ought to be reached concerning Antony we determined yesterday.
When we bestowed honors on his enemies we thereby voted him an enemy.
Salvius, who alone interrupted the proceedings, must either have been wiser
than all the rest, or moved to do so by private friendship, or by ignorance
of present circumstances. It would be most disgraceful to us, on the one
hand, if all should seem to know less than one, and to Salvius, on the other
hand, if he should prefer private friendship to the public weal. If he is
not well acquainted with the present circumstances he ought to repose
confidence in the consuls, rather than in himself, in the praetors,
in his fellow-tribunes, and the other senators, so imposing in dignity and
in numbers, so much his superiors in age and experience, who have condemned
Antony. In our elections and in our jury trials justice is ever on the side
of the majority. If it be needful still to acquaint him with the reasons for
our action I will briefly recount the principal ones by way of reminder. At
Caesar’s death Antony possessed himself of our money. Having been
invested with the government of Macedonia by us he seized upon that of
Cisalpine Gaul without our authority. Having received an army to operate
against the Thracians he brought it into Italy against us instead. Each of
these powers with his own secret motives he asked from us, and when they
were refused he acted on his own authority. At Brundusium he organized a
royal cohort for his own use and openly made men-at-arms his private guards
and night watchmen, serving under a countersign. The whole remainder of the
army he led from Brundusium to the city, aiming by a shorter path at the
same designs that Caesar contemplated. Being anticipated by the
younger Caesar and his army he became alarmed and turned his course
to the Gallic province as a convenient point of attack on us, just as
Caesar found it when he made himself our master.</q> </p>
</div><div n="53" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">In order to intimidate the soldiers to do every unlawful act he should
order, he decimated them although they had not revolted and had not
abandoned their watch or their ranks in time of war, for which offences
alone military law allows such cruel punishment, which only a few generals
have visited upon their soldiers and with reluctance, in cases of extreme
peril, as a matter of necessity. These citizens Antony put to death for a
word or a laugh when they had not been regularly condemned but chosen by
lot. For this reason those who could do so revolted from him, and you
yesterday voted them a donative as well-doers. Those who could not desert
joined him in wrong-doing under the influence of fear, marched against our
province as enemies, and besieged our army and our general, to whom you sent
letters directing him to hold the province. Antony now orders him to
evacuate it. Are we voting Antony an enemy, or is he already making war
against us? And these things our tribune is still ignorant of, and will
remain so until Decimus is overthrown and this great province on our border,
together with the army of Decimus, is added to the resources with which
Antony hopes to attack us. I suppose that the tribune will vote Antony an
enemy as soon as the latter becomes more powerful than we are.</q><note resp="translator">The fifth Philippic of Cicero was
delivered in the Senate on the first day of January, 711, and the sixth
to a popular assembly on the fourth day of the same month. They bear
only slight resemblance to this speech, but are fierce invectives
against Antony.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="54" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Scarcely had Cicero finished speaking when his friends broke forth in such
tumultuous applause that for a long time nobody could be heard on the other
side, until finally Piso came forward, when the senators, out of respect for
him, became silent and even the Ciceronians restrained themselves. Then Piso
said: <q rend="double">Our law, Conscript Fathers, requires that the accused shall himself
hear the charge preferred against him and shall be judged after he has made
his own defence; and for the truth of this I appeal to Cicero, our greatest
orator. Since he hesitates to accuse Antony when present, but brings against
him in his absence certain charges which he considers of the greatest
gravity, and not open to doubt, I have come forward to show, in the fewest
words, that these charges are false. He says that Antony converted the
public money to his own use after Caesar’s death. The law declares
such a person to be a thief, not a public enemy, and limits his punishment
accordingly. After Brutus had killed Caesar he accused the latter
before the people of plundering the public money and leaving the treasury
empty. Soon afterward Antony proposed a decree to investigate these matters
and you adopted and confirmed his motion and promised a reward of one-tenth
to informers, which reward we will double if anybody will prove that Antony
had any part in the fraud. So much for the charge in reference to money.</q> </p>
</div><div n="55" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">We did not vote the governorship of Cisalpine Gaul to Antony. The people
gave it to him by a law, Cicero being present; just as other provinces had
often been given, and as this same governorship had previously been given to
Caesar. It was a part of this law that, when Antony should arrive
at the province given to him, if Decimus would not yield it Antony should
declare war and lead the army into the Gallic province against him, instead
of using it against the Thracians, who were still quiet. But Cicero does not
consider Decimus, who is bearing arms against the law, an enemy, although he
considers Antony an enemy who is fighting in accordance with law. He who
accuses the law itself accuses the authors of the law, whom he ought to
change by persuasion, not to insult after having himself agreed with
them.<note resp="translator">This is absurd and
impossible. The Epitome of Livy (cxvii.) says that the law for the
exchange of provinces was passed by Antony by violence. It was probably
among those mentioned by Cicero in the fifth Philippic (3 and 4) as
passed under military compulsion and in violation of the auspices. Not
only was a tremendous thunder-storm raging <q rend="double">so that Jove himself seemed
to be prohibiting it by clamor from the skies,</q> but the approaches to
the forum were so fenced in <q rend="double">that it would have been impossible to gain
entrance without tearing down the barricade even if no armed soldiers
had stood in the way.</q></note> He ought not to intrust the province to
Decimus, whom the people drove out of the city on account of the murder,
while refusing to intrust to Antony what the people gave to him. It is not
the part of good counsellors to be at variance with the people, especially
in times of danger, or to forget that this very power of deciding who are
friends and who are enemies formerly belonged to the people. According to
the ancient laws the people are the sole arbiters of peace and war. Heaven
grant that they may not be reminded of this, and consequently be angry with
us when they have found a leader.</q> </p>
</div><div n="56" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">But it is said that Antony put certain soldiers to death. Being
commander-in-chief he was empowered to do so by you. No commander has ever
rendered an account of such matters. The laws do not consider it expedient
that the general should be answerable to his soldiers. There is nothing
worse in an army than disobedience, on account of which some soldiers have
been put to death even after a victory, and no one called to account those
who killed them. None of their relatives complain now, but Cicero complains
and while accusing Antony of murder stigmatizes him as a public enemy,
instead of calling for the punishment prescribed for murderers. The
desertion of two of his legions shows how insubordinate and arrogant
Antony’s army was—which legions you had voted that he should command, and
who deserted, in violation of military law, not to you, but to Octavius.
Nevertheless Cicero praised them and yesterday proposed that they be paid
out of the public treasury. Heaven grant that this example may not plague
you hereafter. Hatred has betrayed Cicero into inconsistency, for he accused
Antony of aiming at supreme power and yet punishing his soldiers, whereas
such conspirators are always lenient, not severe, toward the men serving
under them. As Cicero does not hesitate to arraign as tyrannical all the
rest of Antony’s administration since Caesar’s death, come, let me
examine his acts one by one. </q></p>
</div><div n="57" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">Whom has Antony put to death in a tyrannical manner without trial—he who is
now in danger of being condemned unheard? Whom has he banished from the
city? Whom has he slandered in our presence? Or, if innocent toward us
individually, has he conspired against all of us collectively? When, O
Cicero? Was it when he carried through the Senate the act of amnesty for the
past? Was it when he abstained from prosecuting anybody for the murder? Was
it when he moved an investigation of the public moneys? Was it when he
proposed the recall of Sextus Pompey, the son of your Pompey, and payment
for his father’s confiscated property out of the public treasury? Was it
when he seized that conspirator, the false Marius, and put him to death, and
you all applauded? And because you did so it was the only act of Antony that
Cicero did not calumniate. Was it when he brought in a decree that nobody
should ever propose a dictatorship, or vote for it, and that anybody
disobeying the decree might be killed with impunity by any one who wished?
These are the public acts that Antony performed for us during two months the
only months that he remained in the city after Caesar’s death, the
very time when the people were pursuing the murderers and you were
apprehensive of the future. If he were a villain what better opportunity
could he have had? But it is said that he was not in a condition to do
otherwise.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀλλ’ ἐς τὰ ἐναντία οὐκ ἦρχε,</foreign> an
obscure sentence. Combes-Dounous suggested <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἤρκει</foreign> in place of <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἦρχε,</foreign> a change approved by Bekker and
Mendelssohn.</note> How? Did he not exercise the sole authority after
Dolabella departed for Syria? Did he not have an armed force in readiness in
the city, one that you gave him ? Did he not patrol the city by night ? Was
he not guarded at night against any conspiracy of his enemies? Did he not
have an excuse for this in the murder of Caesar, his friend and
benefactor, the man most beloved by the common people ? Did he not have
another of a personal kind in the fact that the murderers conspired against
his life also? None of them did he kill or banish, but pardoned them what he
could in decency, and did not begrudge them the governorships that were
offered to them. Ye behold then, O Romans, these very grave and indisputable
charges of Cicero against Antony.</q> </p>
</div><div n="58" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Since, in addition to charges, surmises are introduced to the effect that
Antony was about to lead an army to the city, but became alarmed because
Octavius had anticipated him with another army, how does it happen that when
the mere intention to do this makes a man an enemy the one who actually
comes and encamps alongside of us without authority is not considered an
enemy? What would have prevented Antony from coming if he had wanted to?
With 30,000 troops in line was he afraid of Octavius’ 3000, half-armed,
unorganized, who had come together merely to gain his friendship, and who
left him as soon as they knew that he had chosen them for war? If Antony was
afraid to come with 30,000 how did he dare to come with only 1000? With
these what a crowd of us accompanied him to Tibur! What a crowd of us
voluntarily joined the soldiers in taking the oath of fidelity to him! What
praises did Cicero lavish on his acts and virtues! If Antony himself
contemplated any such thing [as invasion] why did he leave as pledges in our
hands his mother, his wife, and his grown up son, who are even now at the
door of the Senate weeping and fearful, not on account of what Antony has
done, but on account of the overwhelming power of his enemies. </p>
</div><div n="59" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double">These facts furnish you an example of Antony’s defence and of Cicero’s
fickleness. I will add an exhortation to right-minded men, not to do
injustice to the people or to Antony, not to expose the public interests to
new enmities and dangers while the commonwealth is sick and in want of
timely defenders, but to establish a sufficient force in the city to ward
off danger before breeding disorder outside, to provide against attacks from
every quarter, and to come to such decisions as you please when you are able
to carry them into effect. How shall these ends be accomplished? By allowing
Antony, as a matter of policy, or for the sake of the people, to have
Cisalpine Gaul. Call Decimus thence with his three legions, and when he
comes send him to Macedonia, retaining his legions here. If the two legions
that deserted from Antony deserted to us, as Cicero says, let us summon them
also from Octavius to the city. Thus with five legions sustaining us we
might pass such decrees as we think best with entire confidence, depending
on the favor of no man.</q> </p>
</div><div n="60" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">I have addressed these words to men who listen to me without malice or the
spirit of contention. Those who would excite you heedlessly and
inconsiderately on account of private enmity and private strife I exhort not
to come to hasty and rash decisions against the most important personages,
who command strong armies, and not to force them into war against their
will. Remember Marcius Coriolanus. Recall the recent doings of
Caesar, whom we rashly voted an enemy while he was in like manner
leading an army and offering us the fairest terms of peace, whereby we
forced him to be an enemy in fact. Have regard for the people who were
lately pursuing Caesar’s murderers, lest we seem to insult them by
giving those murderers the governorship of provinces, by praising Decimus
for nullifying the people’s law, and by voting Antony an enemy because he
accepted the Gallic province from the people. For which reasons the
well-wishers of the country ought to take thought for the erring, and the
consuls and tribunes ought to be more than ever careful in view of the
public dangers.</q><note resp="translator">Piso was the
father of Caesar’s wife, Calpurnia. It is very doubtful whether
this speech, or any other in defence of Antony, was made by him. Cicero
tells us in the first Philippic (4, 6, and 7) that Piso made a strong
speech on the first of August on the republican side. In a letter to
Cassius (<title>Ad Fam.</title> xii. 2) he says that Piso is one of
three senators whose blood Antony is seeking, the other two being P.
Servilius and Cicero himself. It must be said, however, that Piso was
capable of changing at any moment, for a blacker character never was
painted than that which Cicero gives him in his Orations <title>De
Provinciis Consularibus</title> and <title>In Pisonem.</title> Dion
Cassius (xlvi. 1-28) says that Quintus Fufius Calenus took the lead in
defending Antony in this debate. In the eighth Philippic (4-6) Cicero
addresses himself to Fufius and answers arguments which the latter had
made in favor of Antony in some debate. At an earlier period Fufius had
been tribune and had fixed the jury which acquitted Clodius when he was
tried for profaning the mysteries of the Bona Dea.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="61" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus did Piso defend Antony, reproaching his enemies and alarming them. He
was evidently the cause of their not voting Antony an enemy. Nevertheless,
he did not succeed in securing for him the governorship of the Gallic
province. The friends and relatives of the murderers prevented it, fearing
lest, at the end of the war, Antony should join Octavius in avenging the
murder, for which reason they meant to keep Octavius and Antony always at
variance with each other. They voted to offer Antony Macedonia instead of
the Gallic province, and they ordered, either heedlessly or designedly, that
the other commands of the Senate be reduced to writing by Cicero and
delivered to the ambassadors. Cicero altered the decree and wrote as
follows: <q rend="double">Antony must raise the siege of Mutina forthwith, relinquish
Cisalpine Gaul to Decimus, withdraw to the hither side of the river Rubicon
(which forms the boundary between Italy and the province) before a specified
day, and submit himself in all things to the Senate.</q> Thus provokingly and
falsely did Cicero write the orders of the Senate, not by reason of an
underlying hostility, as it seems, but at the instigation of some evil
spirit that was goading the republic to revolution and meditating
destruction to Cicero himself.<note resp="translator">The statement that Cicero falsified the message of the Senate to Antony
is untrue. Cicero was vehemently opposed to sending ambassadors to
Antony and in favor of an immediate declaration of war and the levying
of troops against him. The terms of the message adopted by the Senate
and sent by a special embassy are given in the sixth Philippic (2-3).
They are in substance the same as those quoted above. Antony was ordered
to recross the Rubicon, but not to come within 200 miles of Rome.</note>
The remains of Trebonius having been lately brought home and the indignities
visited upon them more carefully inquired into, the Senate with little
opposition declared Dolabella a public enemy. </p>
</div><div n="62" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The ambassadors who had been sent to Antony, ashamed of the extraordinary
character of the orders, said nothing, but simply delivered them to him.
Antony in his wrath indulged in many invectives against the Senate and
Cicero. <q rend="double">He was astonished,</q> he said, <q rend="double">that they should consider
Caesar (the man who had contributed most to the Roman sway) a
tyrant and a king, and did not so consider Cicero, whom Caesar had
captured in war and whose life he had spared, while Cicero in return now
prefers Caesar’s assassins to his friends. He hated Decimus as long
as the latter was the friend of Caesar, but loves him now that he
has become his murderer. He favors a man who took the province of Gaul after
Caesar’s death without authority,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">παρ’ οὐδενὸς</foreign>: <q rend="double">at the
hands of nobody.</q> In Secs. 49 and 50 we are told that Decimus held the
province by the authority of the Senate, and in Sec. 124, Bk. I, that he
had been designated as governor of the province by Caesar
himself, all of whose acts were subsequently, on Antony’s motion,
confirmed by the Senate.</note> and makes war on one who received it at
the hands of the people. He gives rewards to those who deserted from the
legions voted to me, and none to those who remain faithful, thus impairing
military discipline not more to my disadvantage than to that of the state.
He has given amnesty to the murderers, to which I have assented on account
of two respectable men. He holds Antony and Dolabella as enemies because we
keep what was given to us. That is the real reason. And if I but withdraw
from Gaul, then I am neither enemy nor monarch! I declare that I will bring
to naught the amnesty with which they are not satisfied.</q> </p>
</div><div n="63" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After saying much more to the same purpose Antony wrote his reply to the
decree, saying that he would obey the Senate in all respects as the voice of
his country, but to Cicero, who wrote the orders, he would make the
following answer: <q rend="double">The people gave me the province of Gaul by a law, and I
shall prosecute Decimus for not obeying the law, and I shall visit
punishment for the murder upon him alone, as representative of them all, in
order that the Senate, which now participates in the wickedness by reason of
Cicero’s support of Decimus, may at last be purged of the shocking crime.</q> 
These words Antony spoke and wrote in reply.<note resp="translator">Antony’s reply is quoted with a running comment in the
eighth Philippic (8-9). It was a counter-proposition demanding money and
lands for his troops; requiring that the edicts of himself and Dolabella
relative to Caesar’s writings and note-books should not be
questioned; that there should be no inquiry into the disposition made of
the money left by Caesar in the temple of Ops; that he (Antony)
should have the province of Transalpine Gaul with six legions (to be
filled up from the forces under command of Decimus) for at least five
years, and as long as Marcus Brutus and Cassius should retain their
provinces.</note> The Senate immediately voted him an enemy and also the
army under him if it should not abandon him. The government of Macedonia and
Illyria, with the troops still remaining in both, was assigned to Marcus
Brutus until the republic should be reëstablished. The latter
already had an army of his own and had received some troops from
Apuleius.<note resp="translator">Apuleius was the
quaestor of Asia. Plutarch, who gives him the name of
Antistius, says that he was bringing some ships laden with money to Rome
and that Brutus met him near Carystus (at the southern end of
Eubœa) and persuaded him to deliver the ships and contents to
himself, and that the amount of money was 500,000 drachmas. Plutarch
mentions also the store of arms at Demetrias, accumulated by
Caesar for the Parthian expedition. (<title>Life of
Brutus,</title> 24-25.)</note> He also had war-ships and ships of
burden and about 16,000 talents in money and quantities of arms which he
found in Demetrias, where they had been placed by Gaius Caesar long
before, all of which the Senate now voted that he should use for the
advantage of the republic. They voted that Cassius should be governor of
Syria and that he should make war against Dolabella, and that all other
commanders of Roman provinces and soldiers between the Adriatic sea and the
Orient should obey the orders of Cassius and Brutus in all things. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER IX</head>
<head>Octavius alarmed by the Action of the Senate — Octavius, Hirtius, and
Pansa march to the Relief of Decimus — Activity of Cicero in Rome —
Battle between Antony and the Consul Pansa — Pansa wounded and his Men
retire to their Camp — Hirtius comes to the Rescue and defeats
Antony</head>

<div n="64" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus quickly did the Senate seize the opportunity to put the affairs of
Cassius and his party in a brilliant aspect. When Octavius learned what had
been done he was troubled. He had considered the amnesty in the light of an
act of humanity and of pity for the relatives and compeers of these men, and
that the very small commands had been given them for their safety
merely;<note resp="translator">Cyrenaica and Crete;
see Sec. 8. In the eleventh Philippic (12) Cicero praises Brutus for
anticipating the desires of the Senate and not going to his own province
of Crete, but flying to Macedonia, although it had been assigned to
another. It had been assigned to Gaius Antonius.</note> finally, the
confirming of the Gallic province to Decimus seemed to him to have been done
by reason of the Senate’s difference with Antony respecting the supreme
power, on which ground also they were inciting him against Antony. But the
voting of Dolabella an enemy because he had put one of the murderers to
death, the changing of the commands of Brutus and Cassius to the largest
provinces, the granting of great armies and large sums of money to them and
putting them in command of all the governors beyond the Adriatic sea —all
pointed plainly to the building up of the party of Pompey and the pulling
down of that of Caesar. He bethought himself of their artifice in
treating him as a young man, in providing him a statue and a front seat, and
giving him the title of propraetor, when in fact they were taking
from him what army he did have, for a proprietor has no authority when
consuls are serving with him. Then the rewards voted only to those of his
soldiers who had deserted from Antony to him were an indignity to those who
had enlisted under him. Finally the war would be nothing but a disgrace to
him, for the Senate would simply make use of him against Antony till the
latter was crushed. </p>
</div><div n="65" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Meditating thus to himself he performed the sacrifices appertaining to the
command assigned to him, and said to his army: <q rend="double">I owe these honors of mine
to you, fellow-soldiers, not now merely but from the time when you gave me
the command; for the Senate conferred them upon me on account of you. Know,
therefore, that my gratitude will be due to you for these things, and that
it will be expressed to you abundantly if the gods grant success to our
undertakings.</q> In this way he conciliated the soldiers and attached them to
himself. In the meantime, Pansa, one of the consuls, was collecting recruits
throughout Italy, and the other one, Hirtius, shared the command of the
forces with Octavius, and as he was secretly ordered to do it by the Senate
he demanded as his share the two legions that had deserted from Antony,
knowing that they were the most reliable in the army. Octavius yielded to
him in everything and they shared with each other and went into winter
quarters together. As winter advanced Decimus began to suffer from hunger,
and Hirtius and Octavius advanced toward Mutina lest Antony should receive
in surrender Decimus’ army now weak with famine; but as Mutina was closely
hemmed in by Antony, they did not venture to come to close quarters with him
at once, but waited for Pansa. There were frequent cavalry engagements, as
Antony had a much larger force of horse, but the difficulty of the ground,
which was cut up by torrents, deprived him of the advantage of numbers. </p>
</div><div n="66" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Such was the course of events around Mutina. At Rome, in the absence of the
consuls, Cicero took the lead by public speaking. He held frequent
assemblies, procured arms by inducing the artificers to work without pay,
collected money, and exacted heavy contributions from the Antonians. These
paid without complaining in order to avoid calumny, until Publius Ventidius,
who had served under Gaius Caesar and was a friend of Antony,
unable to endure the exactions of Cicero, betook himself to
Caesar’s colonies, where he was well known, and raised two legions
for Antony and hastened to Rome to seize Cicero. The consternation was
extreme. They removed most of the women and children in a panic, and Cicero
himself fled from the city. When Ventidius learned this he turned his course
toward Antony, but being intercepted by Octavius and Hirtius, he proceeded
to Picenum, where he recruited another legion and waited to see what would
happen.<note resp="translator">This tale, in so far
as it relates to Cicero, must be entirely fictitious, since nothing of
the kind is mentioned in the Philippics, although Ventidius is mentioned
twice after his supposed march upon Rome to arrest Cicero.</note> When
Pansa was drawing near with his army, Octavius and Hirtius sent Carsuleius
to him with Octavius’ praetorian cohort and the Martian legion to
assist him in passing through a defile. Antony had disdained to occupy the
defile as it served no other purpose than to hinder the enemy; but, eager to
fight, and having no chance to win distinction with his cavalry, because the
ground was marshy and cut by ditches, he placed his two best legions in
ambush in the marsh, where they were concealed by the reeds and where the
road, which had been thrown up artificially, was narrow. </p>
</div><div n="67" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Carsuleius and Pansa passed through the defile by night. At daybreak, with
only the Martian legion and five other cohorts, they entered upon the road
above mentioned, which was still free from enemies, and looked over the
marsh on either side. There was a suspicious agitation of the bushes, then a
gleaming of shields and helmets, and Antony’s praetorian cohort
suddenly showed itself directly in their front. The Martian legion,
surrounded on all sides and having no way to escape, ordered the new levies,
if they came up, not to join in the fight lest they should cause confusion
by their inexperience. The praetorians of Octavius confronted the
praetorians of Antony. The other troops divided themselves in two
parts and advanced into the marsh on either side, the one commanded by Pansa
and the other by Carsuleius. Thus there were two battles in two marshes, and
neither division could see the other by reason of the elevated road, while
along the road itself the praetorian cohorts fought another battle of their
own. The Antonians were determined to punish the Martians for desertion as
being traitors to themselves. The Martians were equally determined to punish
the Antonians for condoning the slaughter of their comrades at Brundusium.
Recognizing in each other the flower of either army they hoped to decide the
whole war by this single engagement. The one side was moved by shame lest
its two legions should be beaten by one; the other by ambition that its
single legion should overcome the two. </p>
</div><div n="68" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus urged on rather by their own animosity and ambition than by their
generals they assailed each other, considering this their own affair. Being
veterans they raised no battle-cry, since they could not expect to terrify
each other, nor in the engagement did they utter a sound, either as victors
or vanquished. As there could be neither flanking nor charging in marshes
and ditches, they stood together in close order, and since neither could
dislodge the other they locked together with their swords as in a wrestling
match. No blow missed its mark. There were wounds and slaughter but no
cries, only groans; and when one fell he was instantly borne away and
another took his place. They needed neither admonition nor encouragement,
since experience had made each one his own general. When they were overcome
by fatigue they drew apart from each other for a brief space to take breath,
as in gymnastic games, and then rushed again to the encounter. Amazement
took possession of the new levies who had come up, as they beheld such deeds
done with such precision and in such silence. </p>
</div><div n="69" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>All put forth superhuman exertions, and the praetorians of Octavius
perished to the last man. Those of the Martians who were under Carsuleius
got the better of those opposed to them, who gave way, not in disgraceful
rout, but little by little. Those under Pansa were likewise in difficulties,
but they held out with equal bravery on both sides until Pansa was wounded
in the abdomen by a javelin and carried off the field to Bononia. Then his
soldiers retired, at first step by step, but afterward they turned and took
refuge in flight. When the new levies saw this they fled in disorder, and
with loud cries, to their camp, which the quaestor, Torquatus, had
put in readiness for them while the battle was in progress, apprehending
that it might be needed. The new levies dashed into it confusedly although
they were Italians, the same as the Martians, so much more than race does
training contribute to bravery. The Martians for fear of shame did not enter
into the camp, but ranged themselves near it. Although fatigued they were
still furious and ready to fight to the bitter end if anybody should attack
them. Antony refrained from the attack as a bad job, but he fell upon the
new levies and made a great slaughter. </p>
</div><div n="70" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Hirtius near Mutina heard of this fight, at a distance of sixty stades,
he hurried thither with the other legion that had deserted from Antony. It
was already evening and the victorious Antonians were returning singing
hymns of triumph. While they were in loose order Hirtius made his appearance
in perfect order with his legion complete and fresh. The Antonians got
themselves in line under compulsion, and performed against this foe also
many splendid deeds of valor; but being wearied by their recent exertions
they were overcome by the fresh army opposed to them, and the greater part
of them were slain in this encounter by Hirtius, although the latter did not
pursue, being apprehensive of the marshy ground. As darkness was coming on
he allowed them to escape. A wide stretch of the marsh was filled with arms,
corpses, wounded men, and half-dead men. Some were unhurt but were overcome
by fatigue. Antony’s cavalry, as many as he had with him, went to their
assistance and collected them through the entire night. Some they put on
horse-back in their own places, others they took on the horses with
themselves, still others they urged to take hold of the horses’ tails and
run along with them and so secure their safety. Thus were Antony’s forces,
after he had fought splendidly, scattered by the coming of Hirtius. He
encamped without entrenchments in a village near the plain, named Forum
Gallorum.<note resp="translator">The modern Castel
Franco.</note> Antony and Pansa each lost about one-half of their men.
The whole of Octavius’ praetorian cohort perished. The loss of
Hirtius was slight.<note resp="translator">A letter is
preserved in the correspondence of Cicero giving an account of this
battle by Servius Galba, who usually commanded the Martian legion, and
who actually commanded eight cohorts of it in this fight. He had been
one of Caesar’s lieutenants in the Gallic war (<title>B.
G.</title> iii. 1-6), but had joined the conspirators because
Caesar had rejected his claims to the consulship. He was
great-grandfather of the Emperor Galba (Suetonius, <title>Galba,</title>
3). In his letter he says that he was sent 100 miles by Hirtius with the
Martian legion and two praetorian cohorts to meet Pansa, who
was advancing with four legions of newly raised soldiers. As they
approached Forum Gallorum on their return, they passed a forest and a
marsh and then met a detachment of Antony’s horse and light-armed
troops. When these were seen the Martian legion and the two cohorts of
veterans could not be restrained from attacking, wherefore it became
necessary to support them. Antony had posted two veteran legions and two
praetorian cohorts in Forum Gallorum in concealment. These he
drew out and attacked the Martians. Pansa ordered up two of his new
legions and a furious battle ensued. Galba saw Antony personally taking
part in it. Pansa’s men were gradually forced back to their camp, in
which they took refuge. Antony attacked the camp but was repulsed. As
soon as Hirtius heard that a battle was in progress he started with
twenty cohorts of veterans, met Antony as he was returning, attacked and
totally routed him on the very ground where the first battle had been
fought, taking two eagles and sixty standards. The letter is dated April
20. It says that the battle took place on the 15th. (<title>Ad
Fam.</title> x. 30.) In the fourteenth Philippic (14) Cicero says
that Hirtius did not lose a man in the second engagement.</note>
</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER X</head>
<head>Octavius and Hirtius defeat Antony at Mutina — Death of Hirtius —
Antony flees to the Alps — Decimus seeks an Interview with Octavius —
A Thanksgiving at Rome for the Victory over Antony — Death of the
Consul Pansa</head>

<div n="71" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The next day they all withdrew to the camps at Mutina. After so severe a
disaster Antony decided not to come to a general engagement with his enemies
at present, not even if they should attack him, but merely to harass them
daily with his cavalry until Decimus, who was reduced to extremity by
famine, should surrender. For this very reason Hirtius and Octavius decided
to push on a fight. As Antony would not come out when they offered battle,
they moved toward the other side of Mutina where it was less closely
besieged on account of the badness of the ground, as if about to force their
way into the town with their strong army. Antony followed their movement
with his cavalry and this time also with those alone. As the enemy fought
him with their cavalry only, moving the rest of their army in whatever way
they chose, Antony, lest he should lose Mutina, drew out of his
entrenchments two legions. Then his enemies rejoiced at this, turned and
delivered battle. Antony ordered up other legions from other camps, but as
they came slowly, by reason of the suddenness of the call or the long
distance, the army of Octavius won the victory. Hirtius even broke into
Antony’s camp, where he was killed, fighting near the general’s tent.
Octavius rushed in and carried off his body and possessed himself of the
camp. A little later he was driven out by Antony. Both sides passed the
night under arms.<note resp="translator">This battle was
fought on the 27th. While it was in progress Decimus made a sortie from
Mutina and completed the victory. This is mentioned in a letter of
Cicero (<title>Ad Fam.</title> xi. 14). Also in a letter from Marcus
Brutus to Cicero (<title>Ad Brutum,</title> 4). Antony fled from the
field toward the Alps with a very small force of infantry and those
without arms, but by opening the workhouses and impressing all sorts of
people on the road, he collected a considerable number of men. So
Decimus Brutus reported to Cicero, May 5. (<title>Ad farm.</title> xi.
10.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="72" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Antony had suffered this second defeat, he took counsel with his friends
directly after the battle. They advised him to adhere to his first
resolution, to continue the siege of Mutina and not to go out and fight,
saying that the losses had been about equal on both sides, Hirtius having
been killed and Pansa wounded; that he (Antony) was superior in cavalry and
that Mutina was reduced to extremity by famine and must soon succumb. Such
was the advise of his friends, and it was truly for the best. But Antony,
now misled by a god, was fearful lest Octavius should make another attempt
to break into Mutina like that of yesterday, or even try to enclose him
(Antony), as Octavius had the greater force of laborers, <q rend="double">in which case.</q> 
said he, <q rend="double">our cavalry will be useless and Lepidus and Plancus will despise
me as a vanquished man. If we withdraw from Mutina, Ventidius will presently
join us with three legions from Picenum, and Lepidus and Plancus will be
emboldened to ally themselves with us.</q> So he spoke, although he was not a
timid man in the presence of danger; and breaking camp forthwith he made his
way toward the Alps.<note resp="translator">It is plain
from what has gone before that Antony aimed at the supreme power which
Caesar had held, and that Octavius was, in his eyes, an
impertinence and an inconvenience. It is evident also that Octavius
aimed not to destroy Antony, but to cripple and humble him, and so
convince him that he (Octavius) was a person to be reckoned with. A
perception of this truth was forced upon Antony before he was dislodged
from Mutina, for he wrote a letter to Hirtius and Octavius appealing to
them as Caesarians, and pretending that he was solely concerned
in taking vengeance on Decimus as one of the murderers. Hirtius sent it
to Cicero, who read it, with a running comment, in the Senate
(<title>Phil.</title> xiii. 10-21). It shows that Antony was not
destitute of literary ability. A translation of it will be found in the
appendix to Book III.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="73" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Decimus was delivered from the siege he began to be afraid of Octavius,
whom, after the removal of the two consuls, he feared as an enemy. So he
broke down the bridge over the river before daybreak and sent certain
persons to Octavius in a boat, as if to return thanks for rescuing him, and
asked that Octavius would come to the opposite bank of the river to hold a
conversation with him in the presence of the citizens as witnesses, because
he could convince Octavius, he said, that an evil spirit had deceived him
and led him into the conspiracy against Caesar with the others.
Octavius answered the messengers in a tone of anger, declining the thanks
that Decimus gave him, saying: <q rend="double">I am here not to rescue Decimus, but to
fight Antony, with whom I may properly come to terms sometime, but nature
forbids that I should even look at Decimus or hold any conversation with
him. Let him have safety, however, as long as the authorities at Rome
please.</q> When Decimus heard this he stood on the river bank and, calling
Octavius by name, read with a loud voice the letters of the Senate giving
him command of the Gallic province, and forbade Octavius to cross the river
without consular authority, into the government belonging to another, and
not to follow Antony further, because he (Decimus) would suffice for the
pursuit of the latter. Octavius knew that he was prompted to this audacious
course by the Senate, and although able to seize him by giving an order, he
spared him for the present and withdrew to Pansa at Bononia, where he wrote
a full report to the Senate, and Pansa did likewise.<note resp="translator">From the letters of Decimus Brutus to Cicero, we
learn that this entire section 73 is at variance with the facts.
Immediately after Antony’s flight Decimus urged Octavius to cross the
Apennines, in order to intercept Ventidius, who was leading three
legions to Antony’s assistance, in which case, he says, <q rend="double">I should have
driven Antony to such straits that he would have succumbed to want
rather than the sword. But I cannot command Octavius, nor can he command
his own army, which is doubly unfortunate.</q> (<title>Ad Fam.</title> xi.
10.) In another letter written from Pollentia, Decimus gives an account
in detail of his movements after Antony’s flight. <q rend="double">I was not able to
pursue immediately,</q> he says, <q rend="double">because I had neither cavalry nor pack
animals. I did not know that Hirtius was dead. I could not trust
Octavius, until I had met and conversed with him. So that day passed.
Early the next day I was summoned by Pansa to Bononia. While I was on
the road thither news was brought to me that he was dead. So I returned
to my little band, for so I can truly call it, reduced as it is to
extremity by the want of everything. Thus Antony got two days the start
of me.</q> (<title>Ad Fam.</title> xi. 13.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="74" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In Rome Cicero read to the people the report of the consul, and to the Senate
alone that of Octavius. For the victory over Antony, he caused them to vote
a thanksgiving of fifty days,— a longer festivity than the Romans had ever
decreed even after the Gallic or any other war. He induced them to give the
army of the consuls to Decimus, although Pansa was still alive (for his life
was now despaired of), and to appoint Decimus the sole commander against
Antony. Public prayers were offered that Decimus might prevail over him.
Such was Cicero’s passion and want of decorum in reference to Antony. He
confirmed again, to the two legions that had deserted from Antony, the 5000
drachmas per man previously promised to them as the rewards of victory, as
though they had already conquered, and gave them the perpetual right to wear
the olive crown at the public festivals. There was nothing about Octavius in
the decrees, and his name was not even mentioned. He was forthwith
disregarded as though Antony were already destroyed. They wrote to Lepidus,
to Plancus, and to Asinius Pollio to fight Antony when he should draw near
them. Such was the course of events at Rome.<note resp="translator">The decree of the Senate here referred to was passed after
the first victory over Antony, and while both consuls were still alive.
It forms the conclusion of the fourteenth and last Philippic. It awarded
praise in equal measure to Pansa, to Hirtius, and to Octavius; it
provided for a thanksgiving of fifty days, and for paying to the
soldiers who had been engaged, or their surviving relatives, all the
rewards previously promised them, and for the erection of a magnificent
monument to the memory of those who fell in the battle.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="75" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In the meantime Pansa was dying of his wound, and he summoned Octavius to his
side, and said: <q rend="double">I loved your father as I did myself, yet I could not
avenge his death, nor could I fail to unite with the majority, whom you have
also done well to obey, although you have an army. At first they feared you
and Antony, and especially Antony, as he seemed to be the one most ambitious
to fill the rôle of Caesar, and they were delighted with
your dissensions, thinking that you would mutually destroy each other. When
they saw you the master of an army, they complimented you as a young man
with specious and inexpensive honors. When they saw that you were more proud
and self-restrained in respect of honors than they had supposed, and
especially when you declined the magistracy that your army offered you, they
were alarmed and they appointed you to the command with us in order that we
might draw your two experienced legions away from you, hoping that when one
of you was vanquished the other would be weakened and isolated, and so the
whole of Caesar’s party would be effaced and that of Pompey be
restored to power. This is their chief aim.</q> </p>
</div><div n="76" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">Hirtius and I did what we were ordered to do, until we could humble Antony,
who was much too arrogant; but we intended when he was vanquished to bring
him into alliance with you and thus to pay the debt of gratitude we owed to
Caesar’s friendship, the only payment that could be serviceable to
Caesar’s party hereafter. It was not possible to communicate this
to you before, but now that Antony is vanquished and Hirtius dead, and I am
about to pay the debt of nature, the time for speaking has come, not that
you may be grateful to me after my death, but that you, born to a happy
destiny, as your deeds proclaim, may know what is for your own interest, and
know that the course taken by Hirtius and myself was a matter of necessity.
The army that you yourself gave to us should most properly be given back to
you, and I do give it. If you can take and hold the new levies, I will give
you those also. If they are too much in awe of the Senate (for their
officers were sent to act as spies upon us), and if the task would be an
invidious one, and would create trouble for you prematurely, the
quaestor Torquatus will take command of them.</q> After speaking thus
he transferred the new levies to the quaestor and expired. The
quaestor transferred them to Decimus as the Senate had ordered.
Octavius sent the bodies of Hirtius and Pansa with honors to Rome, where
they received a public funeral.<note resp="translator">This is one of the rare cases in ancient history where it is possible
to prove a negative. The letter of Decimus Brutus to Cicero from
Pollentia, already referred to, disposes of all the time between the
death of Hirtius and that of Pansa, so that no such interview as this
could possibly have taken place. Hirtius was killed in the last
engagement, the one in which Antony was put to flight. The next day
Decimus had a meeting and conversation with Octavius at Mutina. Early on
the following day he was summoned to Bononia to confer with Pansa, and
while on the road thither received news of his death. Moreover, all that
we know of the character of Pansa contradicts this tale of treachery.
Pansa was a Caesarian, but he was not false to the cause he
publicly served. The simultaneous deaths of Hirtius and Pansa put so
much power in the hands of Octavius that a story became current that he
had killed the former with his own hand, and had bribed the physician of
the latter to poison his wound. The physician was a Greek named Glyco.
He was arrested and put in prison. There is a letter from Marcus Brutus
to Cicero, complaining bitterly of the injustice done to Glyco, who, it
appears, had married a sister of one of Brutus’ Greek friends named
Achilleus. <q rend="double">The accusation,</q> says Brutus, <q rend="double">has not the least foundation.
Who has suffered more than he from Pansa’s death? Moreover, he is a man
of sobriety and character, whom not even self-interest could impel to
such a crime. I ask you, I ardently beseech you (for our Achilleus is
deeply pained) to have him released from custody, and take care of him.</q> 
(<title>Ad Brutum,</title> 6.) Combes-Dounous thinks that the story
of the death-bed interview with Pansa may have been invented during the
reign of Augustus, to avert the suspicion of foul play against
Pansa.</note></p>
</div></div>
 <div n="11" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XI</head>
<head>Cassius raises an Army — State of Affairs in Syria—Brutus captures
Gaius Antonius in Macedonia — Octavius makes Approaches toward
Reconciliation with Antony—He communicates with Lepidus and Asinius
Pollio - Octavius applies for the Consulship — Asks Cicero to be his
Colleague</head>
<div n="77" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The following events took place in Syria and Macedonia about the same time.
Gaius Caesar, when he passed through Syria, left a legion there, as
he was already contemplating an expedition against the Parthians.
Caecilius Bassus had charge of it, but the title of commander was
held by Sextus Julius, a young man related to Caesar himself, who
was given over to dissipation and who led the legion around everywhere in an
indecorous manner. Once when Bassus reproved him, he replied insultingly,
and sometime later, when he called Bassus to him and the latter was slow in
obeying, he ordered him to be dragged before him. A tumult and blows ensued.
The soldiers would not tolerate the indignity and stabbed Julius. This act
was followed by repentance and fear of Caesar. Accordingly, they
took an oath together that they would defend themselves to the death if they
were not pardoned and restored to confidence, and they compelled Bassus to
take the same oath. They also enlisted and drilled another legion as
associates with themselves. This is one account of Bassus, but Libo<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">Λίβωνι</foreign>; as there is no historian known of the name of
Libo, except one of much earlier date, most critics have concluded that
this is a copyist’s error for <foreign xml:lang="grc">Λιβίῳ</foreign>
(Livy). Mendelssohn does not concur in this view, He does not believe
that a single particle of Appian can have been derived from Livy.</note>
says that he belonged to the army of Pompey and that after the latter’s
defeat he became a private citizen in Tyre, where he corrupted certain
members of the legion, who slew Sextus and chose Bassus for their leader.
However that may have been, Caesar sent Statius Marcus against him
with three legions. Bassus defeated him badly. Finally, Marcus appealed to
Marcius Crispus, the governor of Bithynia, and the latter came to his aid
with three legions. </p>
</div><div n="78" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While Bassus was besieged by the latter, Cassius suddenly came up with them
and took possession, not only of the two legions of Bassus, but also of the
six that were besieging him, whose leaders surrendered in a friendly way and
obeyed him as proconsul; for the Senate had decreed, as I have already said,
that all [beyond the Adriatic] should obey Cassius and Brutus. Just then
Allienus, who had been sent to Egypt by Dolabella, brought from that quarter
four legions of soldiers dispersed by the disasters of Pompey and of
Crassus, or left with Cleopatra by Caesar. Cassius surrounded him
unawares in Palestine and compelled him to surrender, as he did not dare to
fight with four legions against eight. Thus Cassius became the master, in a
surprising way, of twelve legions, and laid siege to Dolabella, who was
coming from Asia with two legions and had been received in Laodicea in a
friendly manner. The Senate was delighted when it heard the news. </p>
</div><div n="79" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In Macedonia Gaius Antonius, the brother of Mark Antony, with one legion of
foot soldiers, contended with Brutus, and, being inferior in strength to the
latter, laid an ambuscade for him. Brutus avoided the trap, and, in his
turn, laid an ambuscade, but he did no harm to those whom he caught in it,
but ordered his own soldiers to salute their adversaries. Although the
latter did not return the salutation or accept the courtesy he allowed them
to pass out of the trap unharmed. Then he went around by other roads and
confronted them again at a precipice, and again did them no harm but saluted
them. Then, regarding him as a saviour of his fellow-citizens, and as one
deserving the reputation he had gained for wisdom and mildness, they
conceived an admiration for him, saluted him, and passed over to him. Gaius
also surrendered himself and was treated with honor by Brutus until he was
convicted of having tried several times to corrupt the army, when he was put
to death.<note resp="translator">Plutarch mentions the
attempt to corrupt the soldiers, but says that Gaius was put to death by
Brutus in retaliation for the killing of Cicero and Decimus Brutus by
Antony (<title>Life of Brutus,</title> 28).</note> Thus, including his
former forces, Brutus had possession of six legions, and since he approved
the valor of the Macedonians he raised two legions among them, whom he
drilled in the Italian discipline. </p>
</div><div n="80" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Such was the state of affairs in Syria and Macedonia. In Italy Octavius,
although he considered it an insult that Decimus, instead of himself, was
chosen general against Antony, concealed his indignation and asked the
honors of a triumph for his exploits. Being disdained by the Senate as
though he were seeking honors beyond his years, he began to fear lest if
Antony were destroyed he should be despised still more, and so he desired a
reconciliation with Antony, as Pansa on his death-bed had recommended to
him.<note resp="translator">As soon as Antony was
defeated and driven to the Alps the Senate supposed that it had no
further need of Octavius. Cicero, who was the first wit, as well as the
greatest orator of the age, indulged in an unseasonable jest about this
time. The first account we have of it is in a letter from Decimus Brutus
to Cicero, dated Eporedia, May 23. <q rend="double">My affection and duty to you,</q> he
says, <q rend="double">compel me to feel for you what I never feel for myself, namely,
fear. It is about a saying that I have heard several times, and have at
no time made light of, and very lately from Labeo Segulius (so very like
himself), who tells me that he was with Octavius, and they were having
much conversation about you. Octavius himself did not make any complaint
of you, except as to a phrase that he said you had uttered, namely, <foreign xml:lang="lat">laudandum adolescentem, ornandum, tollendum.</foreign>.</q> 
The force of this <emph>bon mot</emph> is found in the last word,
which has a double meaning, so that the sentence may read: <q rend="double">The young
man should be praised, honored, and extolled,</q> or <q rend="double">The young man should
be praised, honored, and taken off.</q> Decimus continued, <q rend="double">Octavius said
that he should not furnish any opportunity for his taking off.</q> He added
that very likely Segulius himself had reported this saying to Octavius,
or even that he had invented the whole thing himself (<title>Ad
Fam.</title> xi. 20). We have Cicero’s reply to this letter. <q rend="double">May
the gods confound Segulius,</q> he says, <q rend="double">for the basest creature of all
who live, or have lived, or shall live,</q> but he does not deny that he
made use of the phrase (<title>Ad Fam.</title> xi. 21).</note>
Accordingly, he began to make friends of those of Antony’s army who had been
taken prisoners, both officers and soldiers. He enrolled them among his own
troops, or if they wished to return to Antony he allowed them to do so, in
order to show that he was not moved by implacable hatred against him. When
he was encamped near to Ventidius, Antony’s friend, who had command of three
legions, he inspired the latter with fear, but performed no hostile act, and
in like manner gave him the opportunity to join himself or to go on safely
with his army to Antony, and told him to chide the latter for ignoring their
common interests. Ventidius took the hint and proceeded to join Antony.
Octavius also allowed Decius, one of Antony’s officers, who had been taken
prisoner at Mutina, and had been treated with honor, to return to Antony if
he wished, and when Decius tried to find out what were his sentiments toward
Antony, he said that he had given plenty of indications to persons of
discernment and that more would be insufficient for fools. </p>
</div><div n="81" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After conveying these hints to Antony, Octavius wrote still more plainly to
Lepidus and Asinius concerning the indignities put upon himself and the
rapid advancement of the murderers, causing them to fear, lest in
consequence of the favor extended to the Pompeian faction, each of the
Caesarians should, one by one, share the fate of Antony, although
he was suffering the consequences of his own folly and arrogance.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">κἀκείνῳ
δι’ ἀφροσύνην καὶ ὑπεροψίαν τοῦδε τοῦ δέους τάδε
παθόντι,</foreign> a sentence rendered obscure by the introduction
of the words <foreign xml:lang="grc">τοῦδε τοῦ δέους.</foreign> Nauck
thinks that the whole sentence is spurious.</note> He advised that, for
the sake of appearances, they should obey the Senate, but that they should
confer together for their own safety while they could still do so, and
reproach Antony for his conduct; that they should follow the example of
their own soldiers, who did not separate even when theywere discharged from
the service but, in order that they might not be exposed to the assaults of
enemies, preferred to unite their strength by settling together on ground
that belonged not to them in groups, rather than enjoy their own homesteads
singly. These things Octavius wrote to Lepidus and Asinius.<note resp="translator">That Octavius was serving his own
interest, and not that of the republic, was perceived by Plancus, who
wrote to Cicero as follows: <q rend="double">You know, my dear Cicero, that I share your
affection for Octavius. Because of my intimacy with Caesar when
he was alive, I was under the necessity of defending and loving
Octavius, and for the further reason that, as far as I could discover,
he was himself a young man of most moderate and humane sentiments.
Considering the distinguished friendship that existed between
Caesar and myself, it would have been base in me not to hold
him in the place of a son, when he had been adopted as such by
Caesar, and confirmed by the judgment of the Senate. Now, what
I write to you I swear that I write more in sorrow than in anger. That
Antony is alive to-day, that Lepidus has joined him, that they have an
army not to be despised, that they have hope and courage, are due wholly
to Octavius. Not to go farther back, if he had been willing to join me
at the time he said he would, either the war would now be ended, or it
would be pushed into Spain, which is most hostile to them, to their
great disadvantage.</q> (<title>Ad Fam.</title> x. 24.) This letter is
dated July 28.</note> The first soldiers of Decimus fell sick by reason
of excessive eating after their famine, and suffered from dysentery, and the
newer ones were still undrilled. Plancus soon joined him with his army, and
then Decimus wrote to the Senate that he would pursue and capture Antony
immediately.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ναυτικῶν περ ἤδη γεγονότων;</foreign> literally <q rend="double">whose naval arrangements were already made.</q> This is so incongruous with
historical facts that most commentators have substituted some other word
for <foreign xml:lang="grc">ναυτικῶν.</foreign> Schweighäuser
suggested <foreign xml:lang="grc">ναστίκον</foreign> (hard pressed), but
he left a blank at this place in the Latin version. Combes-Dounous adds
the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">αὖτῳ</foreign>, and renders the
passage that Antony had made preparations for flight by water. Tyrwhitt
(as we learn from the preface to the Didot edition) conceived that the
right words were <foreign xml:lang="grc">αὐτίκα. ὦνπερ ἤδη
γεγονότων, οἵ τε Πομπηϊανοὶ,</foreign> etc., the last six
words being transferred to the beginning of Sec. 82. Thus the rendering
would be: <q rend="double">Decimus wrote to the Senate that he would pursue and capture
Antony immediately. When the Pompeians learned what had happened,</q> etc.,
a rational explanation.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="82" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the Pompeians learned what had happened (and an astonishing number
showed themselves to be of that party), they exclaimed that their ancestral
freedom had at last been regained, and they each offered sacrifices.
Decemvirs were chosen to examine the accounts of Antony’s magistracy. This
was a preliminary step to annulling Caesar’s arrangements, for
Antony had done little or nothing himself, but had conducted all the affairs
of state in accordance with Caesar’s memoranda.<note resp="translator">This is very far from the truth. Appian’s
partiality for Antony is equal to all emergencies.</note> The Senate
knew this well, but it hoped that by finding a pretext for annulling a part
of the measures it should be enabled in the same way to annul the whole. The
decemvirs gave public notice that whoever had received anything from
Antony’s government should make it known in writing immediately, and
threatened any who should disobey. The Pompeians also sought the consulship
for the remainder of the year in place of Hirtius and Pansa. But Octavius
also sought it, applying not to the Senate, but to Cicero privately, whom he
urged to become his colleague, saying that Cicero should carry on the
government, as he was the elder and more experienced, and that he (Octavius)
would enjoy the title only, by which means he could dismiss his army in a
becoming manner, for which reason he had previously asked the honor of a
triumph. Cicero, whose desire for office was excited by this proposal, said
to the Senate that he understood that a negotiation was on foot among the
generals commanding the provinces, and he advised that they should
conciliate the man whom they had treated with disdain and who was still at
the head of a large army, and allow him to hold office in the city,
notwithstanding his youth, rather than that he should remain under arms in a
hostile attitude. But lest he should do anything contrary to the interest of
the Senate, Cicero proposed that some man of prudence from among the older
ones should be chosen as his colleague as a firm check upon the immaturity
of Octavius. The Senate laughed at Cicero’s ambition, and the relatives of
the conspirators especially opposed him, fearing lest Octavius, as consul,
should bring the murderers to punishment.”<note resp="translator">Plutarch says that <q rend="double">Octavius sent friends to Cicero to beg
and persuade him to obtain the consulship for both of them, saying that
he (Cicero) might conduct the business in whatever way he chose after
entering upon the office, and might govern him, as he was a young man
solicitous only for the name and the honor. Octavius himself
acknowledges that, as he was fearful of being ruined and in danger of
being deserted, he made use of Cicero’s desire for office by persuading
him to seek the consulship in coöperation with himself, and to
assist him in the canvass. Thereupon Cicero, although now an old man,
was allured by the young man and cheated by him, for he aided Octavius
in this canvass for the consulship, and brought the Senate over to his
side; but being presently blamed by his friends, he perceived a little
later that he was undone, and that he had betrayed the liberty of the
people.</q> (<title>Life of Cicero,</title> 45 and 46.) It seems that
Plutarch drew his information, either directly or indirectly, from the
memoirs of Octavius, which were extant in his time. It is probable that
Appian drew from the same source, as he refers to it in his Illyrian
history, Sec. 14. Both Dr. Middleton and Mr. Strachan-Davidson, in their
respective biographies of Cicero, doubt this tale, and I agree with
them. Yet its truth might be conceded without discredit to Cicero. That
he was hoodwinked disastrously by Octavius is well known. In the fifth
Philippic (18) he had pledged himself to the Senate in the most fervent
terms for the fidelity of Octavius to the republic, and he might well
have reasoned that the latter would allow him to guide the republic,
whose fate was then trembling in the balance. The death of the two
consuls had left Rome at the mercy of half a dozen commanders in the
field, who could not be controlled by the Senate. Under such
circumstances Cicero might have grasped at the consulship in conjunction
with Octavius, without the motive of personal ambition. But the whole
story is incongruous with known facts. The Epitome of Livy makes no
mention of it.</note>
</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XII</head>
<head>Antony encamps near Lepidus — They unite their Forces and Ventidius
joins Antony — Consternation at Rome — Increasing Coolness between
Octavius and the Senate — Octavius sends Soldiers to the Senate to
demand the Consulship — He marches toward Rome with his Army</head>

<div n="83" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>For various reasons the election was postponed in accordance with the law.
Meanwhile, Antony passed over the Alps with the permission of Culleo, who
had been stationed there by Lepidus to guard them, and advanced to a river
where the latter was encamped. He neglected to surround himself with
palisade and ditch, as though he were camping alongside a friend. Messengers
were going back and forth between them constantly, Antony reminding Lepidus
of their friendship and of his various good offices, and showing him that
after he (Antony) should be destroyed all who had enjoyed Caesar’s
friendship would suffer a like fate, one by one. Lepidus feared the Senate,
which had ordered him to make war on Antony, but he promised nevertheless
that he would not do so voluntarily. The army of Lepidus, having respect for
Antony’s dignity and perceiving the messengers going back and forth, and
being gratified with the simple manners prevailing in Antony’s camp, mingled
with his men, at first secretly, then openly, like fellow-citizens and
fellow-soldiers, disregarding the orders of the tribunes, who forbade their
doing so; and in order to facilitate their intercourse they made a bridge of
boats across the river. The so-called Tenth Legion, that had been enlisted
by Antony originally, arranged things for him inside the camp of Lepidus. </p>
</div><div n="84" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Laterensis, one of the distinguished members of the Senate, perceived
this he warned Lepidus. As the latter was incredulous Laterensis advised him
to divide his army in several parts and send them away on certain errands in
order to test whether they were faithful or not. Accordingly, Lepidus
divided them in three parts, and ordered them to go out by night in order to
protect some quaestors who were approaching. About the last watch
the soldiers armed themselves as if for the march, seized the fortified
parts of the camp, and opened the gates to Antony. The latter came running
to the tent of Lepidus, whose whole army was now escorting Antony, and they
besought Lepidus for peace and compassion to their unfortunate
fellow-citizens. Lepidus leaped out of bed among them undressed, just as he
was, promised to do what they asked, embraced Antony, and pleaded necessity
as his excuse. Some say that he fell on his knees before Antony, being an
inexperienced and timid man. Not all writers put faith in this report, nor
do I, for he had as yet done nothing whatever inimical to Antony and nothing
to cause fear. Thus did Antony again become a very powerful man and most
formidable to his enemies. He had the army with which he had abandoned the
siege of Mutina, including its magnificent cavalry. Ventidius had joined him
on the road with three legions. Lepidus had become his ally with seven
legions of foot soldiers and a great number of auxiliary troops and
apparatus in proportion. Lepidus nominally retained the command of these,
but Antony directed every-thing. </p>
</div><div n="85" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When these facts became known at Rome a wonderful and sudden change took
place. Those who had just now held Antony in contempt were alarmed, while
the fears of others were changed to courage. The edicts of the decemvirs
were torn down with derision and the consular election was still further
postponed. The Senate, wholly at a loss what to do and fearful lest Octavius
and Antony should form an alliance, sent two of their number, Lucius and
Pansa, secretly to Brutus and Cassius, under pretence of attending the games
in Greece, to urge them to lend all the assistance possible. It recalled
from Africa two of the three legions under Sextius, and ordered the third to
be given over to Cornificius, who commanded another portion of Africa, and
who favored the senatorial party. Although they knew that these legions had
served under Gaius Caesar, and although they suspected everything
of his, yet the want of other forces compelled them to take this course.
Most awkwardly, too, they reappointed the young Octavius as general with
Decimus against Antony, for they feared lest he should unite with Antony. </p>
</div><div n="86" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius excited the army to anger against the Senate on account of its
repeated indignities toward himself, and for requiring the soldiers to
undertake a second campaign before paying them the 5000 drachmas per man
which it had promised to give them for the first. He advised them to send
and ask for the money. They sent their centurions. The Senate understood
that the men had been advised to this course by Octavius and said that it
would make answer by its own legates. It sent the latter, under
instructions, to address themselves, when Octavius was not present, to the
two legions which had deserted from Antony, and to advise the soldiers not
to rest their hopes on a single person, but on the Senate, which alone had
perpetual power, and to go to the camp of Decimus, where they would find the
promised money. Having delivered this charge to the legates it forwarded
one-half of the donative and appointed ten men to divide it, to whom it did
not add Octavius as the eleventh. As the two legions refused to meet them
without Octavius, the legates returned leaving the business unfinished.
Octavius no longer held communication with the troops through the medium of
others and no longer asked them to wait, but assembled the army and came
before them and related to them the indignities he had suffered from the
Senate, and its purpose to destroy all the friends of Gaius Caesar,
one by one. He admonished them also to beware against being transferred to a
general opposed to their party and sent to one war after another for the
purpose of being killed or arrayed in opposition to each other. This was the
reason why, after their common struggles at Mutina were ended, rewards were
given to only two legions, in order to induce strife and sedition in the
army. </p>
</div><div n="87" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double">You know,</q> he said, <q rend="double">the reason why Antony was lately vanquished. You have
heard what the Pompeians in the city did to those who had received certain
gifts from Caesar. What confidence can you have of keeping the
lands and money you have received from him, or what confidence can I have in
my own safety while the relatives of the murderers dominate the Senate ? I
shall accept my fate, whatever it may be, for it is beautiful to suffer
anything in the service of a father; but I fear for you, such a host of
brave men, who have incurred danger in behalf of me and my father. You know
that I have been free from ambition from the time when I declined the
praetorship that you offered me with the insignia of that office. I
see only one path of safety now for both of us, and that is that I obtain
the consulship by your help. In that case all of my father’s gifts to you
will be confirmed, the colonies that are still due to you will be
forthcoming, and all your rewards will be paid in full; and after bringing
the murderers to punishment I will release you from any more wars.</q> </p>
</div><div n="88" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>At these words the army cheered heartily, and forthwith sent their centurions
to ask the consulship for Octavius. When the Senate began to make talk about
his youth, the centurions replied, as they had been instructed, that in the
olden time Corvinus had held the office and at a later period the Scipios,
both the elder and the younger, before the legal age, and that the country
profited much from the youth of each. They instanced, as recent examples,
Pompey the Great and Dolabella and said that it had been granted to
Caesar himself to stand for the consulship ten years before the
legal age.<note resp="translator">This is erroneous.
Caesar was first elected consul in the year 694 (B.C. <date when="-0060">60</date>), and entered upon the office at the beginning
of 695, at which time he had just reached the legal age of
forty-three.</note> While the centurions were arguing with much
boldness, some of the senators, who could not endure that army officers
should use such freedom of speech, rebuked them for exceeding the bounds of
military discipline. When the army heard of this, they were still more
exasperated and demanded to be led immediately to the city, saying that they
would hold a special election and elevate him to the consulship because he
was Caesar’s son. At the same time they extolled the elder
Caesar without stint. When Octavius saw them in this excited state,
he led them directly from the assembly toward the city, eight legions of
foot and a corresponding number of horse, and the auxiliary troops that were
serving with the legions. Having crossed the river Rubicon from the Gallic
province into Italy, — the stream that his father crossed in like manner at
the beginning of the civil war, — he divided his army in two parts. One of
these divisions he ordered to follow in a leisurely way. The other and
better one, consisting of picked men, made forced marches, hastening in
order to take the city unprepared. Meeting a convoy on the road with a part
of the money which the Senate was sending as a present to the soldiers,
Octavius feared the effect it might have on his mercenaries. So he secretly
sent forward a force to scare away the convoy, and they took to flight with
the money.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="13" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XIII</head>
<head>Alarm in the City — Mutual Criminations in the Senate — Vacillating
Counsels — The Senate resolves to resist — Octavius arrives at the
City Gates — The New Legions go over to him — Cicero departs from the
City — Octavius is elected Consul with Pedius as his Colleague — His
Adoption by Caesar ratified by the People</head>
<div n="89" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the news of Octavius’ approach reached the city there was immense
confusion and alarm. People ran hither and thither, and some conveyed their
wives and children and whatever they held most dear to the fields and to the
fortified parts of the city, for it was not yet known that he aimed only at
securing the consulship. Having heard that an army was advancing with
hostile intentions, there was nothing that they did not fear. The Senate was
struck with consternation since it had no military force in readiness. As is
usual in cases of panic they blamed each other. Some were blamed because
they had wrongfully deprived him of the command of the campaign against
Antony, others because they had treated with contempt his demand for a
triumph, a request which was not without justice; others because they had
envied him the honor of distributing the money; others because he had not
been made an additional member of the board of ten. Still others said that
the army had become hostile because the gifts voted to them had not been
quickly and fully paid. They complained especially because of the
inopportune time for such a strife, while Brutus and Cassius were far away
and their forces not yet organized, and on their own flank in a hostile
attitude were Antony and Lepidus, who, they thought, might form an alliance
with Octavius. Thus their fears were greatly augmented. Cicero, who had so
long taken the lead, was nowhere to be seen.<note resp="translator">In the month of July Cicero wrote a despairing letter to
Brutus acquainting him with the demand made by Octavius for the
consulship. <q rend="double">Octavius,</q> he says, <q rend="double">who has hitherto been governed by my
counsels and who has shown a most excellent disposition and an admirable
firmness, has been pushed on by certain persons by most wicked letters
and lying reports and messages to an absolutely certain hope of the
consulship. As soon as I learned this I ceased not to admonish him by
letters while absent, and to accuse his friends who are present, and who
seem to support his claims, nor did I hesitate to expose in the Senate
the source of these most wretched designs. Nor do I remember any affair
in which the Senate or the magistrates have shown a better spirit. For
it has never before happened when it was a question of conferring an
extraordinary honor on a powerful man, or rather an all-powerful man
(since power now resides in force and arms), that no one, whether
tribune of the people or other magistrate or even a private person,
would lift his voice in favor of it. Yet in the midst of this firmness
and virtue the city was in a state of anxiety. We are made sport of,
Brutus, by the whims of the soldiers and the insolence of the general.
Each one demands as much power in the republic as he has the force to
extort. Reason, moderation, law, custom, duty, count for nothing, nor is
regard for the opinion of citizens, or shame for that of posterity, of
any avail. It was because I foresaw all this long ago that I fled from
Italy, at the time when the report of your proclamation recalled me.</q> 
(<title>Ad Brutum,</title> 10.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="90" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>There was a sudden change on all hands. Instead of 2500 drachmas 5000 were
given. Instead of two legions only, the entire eight were to be paid.
Octavius was appointed to make the distribution instead of the ten
commissioners, and he was allowed to be a candidate for the consulship while
absent. Messengers were hastily despatched to tell him these things.
Directly after they had left the city the Senate repented. It felt that it
ought not to be so weakly terror-stricken, or accept a new tyranny without
bloodshed, or accustom those seeking office to gain it by violence, or the
soldiers to govern the country by the word of command. Rather should they
arm themselves as far as possible and oppose the laws to the invaders, for
there was some hope that, if the laws were opposed to them, not even they
would bear arms against their country. If they should do so, it would be
best to endure a siege until Decimus and Plancus should come to the rescue,
and to defend themselves to the death rather than submit voluntarily to a
slavery thenceforth without remedy. They recounted the high spirit and
endurance in behalf of freedom of the Romans of old, who never yielded
anything prejudicial to their liberty. </p>
</div><div n="91" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As the two legions sent for from Africa happened to arrive in the harbor on
the same day, it seemed as though the gods were urging them to defend their
freedom. Their regret for what they had done was confirmed; Cicero again
made his appearance, and they repealed all of the decrees above mentioned.
All who were of military age were called to arms, also the two legions from
Africa, and 1000 horse with them, and another legion that Pansa had left
behind, all these were assigned to their proper places. Some of them guarded
the so-called hill of Janiculum, where the money was stored, others held the
bridge over the Tiber, and the city praetors were put in command of
the separate divisions. Others made ready small boats and ships in the
harbor, together with money, in order to escape by sea in case they should
be vanquished. While courageously making these hasty preparations they hoped
to alarm Octavius in his turn, and induce him to seek the consulship from
them instead of the army, or they hoped at least to defend themselves to the
last extremity. They hoped also to change those of the opposite faction as
soon as it became a contest for liberty. When they sought for the mother and
sister of Octavius, and did not discover them either in any open or secret
abode, they were again alarmed at finding themselves deprived of such
important hostages, and as the Caesarians showed no disposition to
yield to them they concluded that these women had been carefully concealed
by them. </p>
</div><div n="92" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While Octavius was still giving audience to the messengers, it was announced
to him that the decrees had been rescinded. The messengers thereupon
withdrew, covered with confusion. With his army still more exasperated
Octavius hastened to the city, fearing lest some evil should befall his
mother and sister. To the plebeians, who were in a state of consternation,
he sent horsemen in advance to tell them to have no fear. While all were
amazed he took a position just beyond the Quirinal hill, no one daring to
fight or prevent him. Now another wonderful and sudden change took place.
Patricians flocked out and saluted him. The common people ran also and
admired the good order of the soldiers, which they considered a sign of
peace. On the following day Octavius advanced toward the city, leaving his
army where it was, and having with him only a sufficient guard. Here, again,
crowds met him along the whole road and saluted him, omitting nothing that
savored of friendliness and weak compliance. His mother and sister, who were
in the temple of Vesta with the Vestal virgins, embraced him. The three
legions, in spite of their generals, sent ambassadors and transferred
themselves to him. One of the generals in command of them, Cornutus, killed
himself. The others allied themselves with Octavius. When Cicero learned
this he sought an interview with Octavius through friends. When it was
granted he defended himself and dwelt much upon his proposing Octavius for
the consulship, as he had done in the Senate on a former occasion. Octavius
answered ironically that Cicero seemed to be the last of his friends to
greet him. </p>
</div><div n="93" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The next night a rumor gained currency that two of Octavius’ legions, the
Martian and the Fourth, had gone over to the side of the republic, because
they had been led against their country by deception. The praetors
and the Senate put faith in this report heedlessly, although the army was
very near, thinking that with the assistance of these two legions, as they
were the bravest, it would be possible to hold out against the rest of
Octavius’ army until some force from elsewhere should come to the rescue.
The same night they sent Manius Aquilius Crassus to Picenum to raise troops,
and ordered one of the tribunes, named Apuleius, to run through the city and
proclaim the good news to the people. The senators assembled by night in the
senate-house, and Cicero received them at the door, but when the news was
contradicted he took flight in a litter. </p>
</div><div n="94" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius laughed at them and moved his army nearer to the city and stationed
it in the Campus Martius. He did not then punish any of the
praetors, not even Crassus who had rushed off to Picenum, although
the latter was brought before him just as he was caught, in the disguise of
a slave. He pardoned all in order to acquire a reputation for clemency. But
not long afterward they were put on the list of the proscribed. He ordered
that the public money on the Janiculum or elsewhere be brought to him, and
that the amount that had been previously ordered to be paid on the motion of
Cicero be distributed; that is, he divided 2500 drachmas per man and
promised to give them the remainder. Then he took his departure from the
city until the consuls should be chosen by the comitia. Having been elected,
together with Quintus Pedius, whom he desired to have as his colleague, and
who had given to him his own portion of his inheritance from
Caesar, he entered the city as consul. He offered the usual
sacrifices, and twelve vultures were seen; the same number, they say, that
appeared to Romulus when he laid the foundations of the city. After the
sacrifices he caused his adoption by his father to be ratified again,
according to the <foreign xml:lang="lat">lex curiata,</foreign> — that is, by a popular
vote, — for the parts into which the tribes, or the common people, are
divided are called <foreign xml:lang="lat">curiae,</foreign> just as I suppose the
similar divisions among the Greeks are called
<foreign xml:lang="lat">phratriae.</foreign> Among the Romans this was the
method of adoption most in accordance with law in the case of orphans; and
those who follow it have the same rights as real sons in respect of the
relatives and the freedmen of the persons who adopt them. Among the other
splendid accessories of Caesar was a large number of freedmen, many
of them rich, and this was perhaps the principal reason why Octavius wanted
the adoption by a vote of the people in addition to the former adoption
which came to him by Caesar’s will.<note resp="translator">Suetonius says that Octavius obtained his first consulship
in the month Sextilis and that he gave it his own name (August) in
commemoration of the event (<title>Aug.</title> 31). Velleius says that
he entered upon his consulship on the 22d of September and that this was
the day before he became twenty years of age (ii. 65). The Epitome of
Livy (cxix) says: <q rend="double">The Senate showed little gratitude to Octavius, the
only survivor of the three leaders at Mutina. The honor of a triumph was
decreed to Decimus Brutus, who was delivered from the siege of Mutina by
Octavius. They did not make sufficiently grateful mention of Octavius
and his soldiers, for which reason, after a reconciliation had been
effected by him with Antony through Marcus Lepidus, he came to Rome with
his army, struck terror into those who had treated him unjustly, and was
created consul when he was nineteen years of age.</q></note></p>
</div></div>
 <div n="14" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XIV</head>
<head>Indictment and Trial of Caesar’s Murderers — The Senate
rescinds its Decrees against Antony and Lepidus — Flight of Decimus
Brutus — He is captured and put to Death</head>
<div n="95" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>He caused a new law to be passed to repeal the one which declared Dolabella a
public enemy, and also to punish the murder of Caesar. Indictments
were found forthwith, the friends of Caesar bringing accusations
against some for actual participation in the crime and against others as
having guilty knowledge only. Several were indicted, and among them some who
were not in the city when Caesar was killed. One day was fixed by
public proclamation for the trial of all, and judgment was taken against all
by default while Octavius was overlooking the court. None of the judges
voted for acquittal except one patrician, who then escaped with impunity,
but was included with others in the proscription a little later. It appears
that about this time Quintus Gallius, a city praetor and brother of
Marcus Gallius, who was serving with Antony, asked Octavius for the command
of Africa, and, being thus brought into his presence, attempted to take his
life. His colleagues stripped him of his praetorship, the people
tore his house down, and the Senate condemned him to death. Octavius ordered
him to depart to his brother, and it is said that he took ship and was never
seen again.<note resp="translator">Suetonius gives us
two different accounts of this affair of Quintus Gallius. One of these
says that <q rend="double">Gallius, while paying his respects to Octavius, had a pair
of tablets hidden under his garments. Octavius suspected him of
concealing a sword, but did not search him lest he should find that it
was something else but caused him presently to be dragged away by
centurions and soldiers, and subjected to torture like a slave; and as
he confessed nothing, ordered him to be put to death after digging out
his eyes with his own hands.</q> The other account, which Suetonius says
was written by Octavius himself, agrees substantially with that of
Appian (<title>Aug.</title> 27).</note>
</p>
</div><div n="96" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>These things accomplished, Octavius formed plans for a reconciliation with
Antony, for he had learned that Brutus and Cassius had already collected
twenty legions of soldiers, and he needed Antony’s help against them. He
moved out of the city toward the Adriatic coast and proceeded in a leisurely
way, waiting to see what the Senate would do. Pedius persuaded the senators,
after Octavius had taken his departure, not to make their differences with
each other irremediable, but to be reconciled to Lepidus and Antony. They
foresaw that such a reconciliation would not be for their advantage or for
that of the country, but would be merely an assistance to Octavius against
Brutus and Cassius. Nevertheless, they gave their approval and assent to it
as a matter of necessity. So the decrees declaring Antony and Lepidus, and
the soldiers under them, public enemies, were repealed, and others of a
peaceful nature were sent to them. Thereupon Octavius wrote and
congratulated them, and he promised to lend assistance to Antony against
Decimus Brutus if he needed it. They replied to him at once in a friendly
spirit and eulogized him. Antony wrote that he would himself take vengeance
on Decimus for Caesar’s account and on Plancus<note resp="translator">The movements of Plancus are minutely described
in his numerous letters to Cicero. Although a Caesarian, he
intended to remain faithful to the republic and would probably have done
so had not the supremacy acquired by Octavius at Rome and the
reconciliation of the latter with Antony made his military position
untenable.</note> for his own, and that then he would join forces with
Octavius. </p>
</div><div n="97" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Such were the letters which they exchanged with each other. While pursuing
Decimus, Antony was joined by Asinius Pollio with two legions. Asinius also
brought about an arrangement with Plancus, by virtue of which the latter
passed over to Antony with three legions, so that Antony now had much the
strongest force. Decimus had ten legions, of whom four, the most experienced
in war, had suffered severely from famine and were still enfeebled. The
other six were new levies, still untrained and unaccustomed to their labors.
As he despaired of fighting, he decided to flee to Marcus Brutus in
Macedonia. He retreated not by the higher Alps, but toward Ravenna and
Aquileia. Since Caesar had travelled by this route, Decimus
proposed another longer and more difficult one — to cross the Rhine and
traverse the wild country of barbarian tribes. Thereupon the new levies,
bewildered and fatigued, were the first to desert him and join Octavius.
After them the four older legions joined Antony, and the auxiliaries did the
same, except a body-guard of Gallic horse. Then Decimus allowed those who
wished to do so to return to their own homes, and, after distributing among
them the gold he had with him, proceeded toward the Rhine with 300
followers, the only ones who remained. As it was difficult to cross the
river with so few, he was now abandoned by all the others except ten. He put
on Gallic clothing, and, as he was acquainted with the language, he
proceeded on his journey with these, passing himself off as a Gaul. He no
longer followed the longer route, but went toward Aquileia, thinking that he
should escape notice by reason of the smallness of his force.<note resp="translator">Appian’s geography is much in need
of amendment. It is impossible to trace the route taken by Decimus from
this description.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="98" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Having been captured by robbers and bound, he asked them who was the chief of
this Gallic tribe. He was informed that it was Camillus, a man to whom he
had done many favors. So he told them to bring him to Camillus. When the
latter saw him led in, he greeted him in a friendly way in public, and
scolded those who had bound him, for putting an indignity on so great a man
through ignorance; but he sent word to Antony secretly. Antony was some-what
touched by this change of fortune, and was not willing to see Decimus, but
he ordered Camillus to kill him and send his head to himself.<note resp="translator">Velleius (ii. 64) gives a somewhat
different account of the death of Decimus. <q rend="double">Decimus Brutus,</q> he says,
 <q rend="double">deserted first by Plancus and afterwards plotted against by him, seeing
his army melting away, took to flight and accepted the hospitality of a
nobleman named Camelus, in whose house he was found by Antony’s
emissaries and slain.</q> The Epitome of Livy (cxx.) says that Decimus was
put to death by Capenas Sequanus by order of Antony, into whose hands he
had fallen.</note> When he saw the head he ordered his attendants to
bury it. Such was the end of Decimus, who had been Caesar’s
praefect of horse and had governed Farther Gaul<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">τῆς παλαιᾶς
Κελτικῆς;</foreign> <q rend="double">older Gaul,</q> which, as Appian himself tells
us in iv. 2, <emph>infra,</emph> means that part of Transalpine
Gaul which was held by the Romans before Caesar’s conquests.
Yet we know from ii. III, <emph>supra,</emph> that the whole of
Transalpine Gaul was placed in charge of Decimus Brutus by
Caesar just before he embarked for Africa. These facts make it
almost certain that the original text was <foreign xml:lang="grc">περαίας</foreign> instead of <foreign xml:lang="grc">παλαιᾶς.</foreign></note> under him and had been designated by him
for the consulship the coming year and for the governorship of Hither Gaul.
He was the next of the murderers after Trebonius to meet punishment, within
a year and a half of the assassination. About the same time Minucius
Basilus, another of Caesar’s murderers, was killed by his slaves,
some of whom he was castrating by way of punishment. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="appendix" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<div n="0" type="textpart" subtype="section">
 <head>Antony to Hirtius and Octavius</head>
<quote>WHEN I heard of the death of Trebonius I was both glad and sorry. It
rejoiced me to know-that a wretch had paid the penalty due to the ashes and
bones of the most illustrious of men, and that the vengeance of the gods had
overtaken him within the term of the revolving year, and that punishment for
the parricidal act is either accomplished or impending. I mourn that
Dolabella was voted an enemy as soon as he had put the assassin to death,
and that the son of a buffoon should seem dearer to the Roman people than
Gaius Caesar, the father of his country. Most grievous is it that
you, Aulus Hirtius, loaded as you are with Caesar’s benefactions,
and left by him in a condition that must be a surprise to yourself, and you,
O boy, who owe everything to his name, should so conduct yourselves that
Dolabella should be condemned by law, and this pest [Decimus Brutus]
delivered from siege, and Brutus and Cassius strengthened as much as
possible. You look upon the present state of things too much as you have
viewed the past. You call Pompey’s camp the Senate. You have taken the
vanquished Cicero for a leader. You are strengthening Macedonia with armies.
You have placed Africa in charge of Varus, who was twice taken prisoner. You
have sent Cassius into Syria. You have allowed Casca to hold the
tribuneship. You have taken away the revenues of the Luperci assigned to
them by Caesar. You have abolished the colonies of veterans
established by law and <foreign xml:lang="lat">senatus consultum.</foreign> You promise to
restore to the Massilians what was taken from them by the law of war. Do you
forget that under the law of Hirtius no Pompeian who lives can hold office?
You have supplied Brutus with the money of Apuleius. You applauded the
execution of Paetus and Menedemus, Caesar’s hosts, who had
been given the citizenship by him. You took no notice of Theopompus when he
was stripped and driven out by Trebonius and fled to Alexandria. You
tolerate Servius Galba in your camp girded with the same dagger [with which
he stabbed Caesar]. You have enlisted my soldiers and the veterans
under pretence of exterminating those who killed Caesar, and have
hurled them, in ignorance of what they were doing, against their
quaestor, their general, their comrades. In short, what have you
not approved of, what have you not done, that Pompey himself would do if he
could come to life, or his son if he were at home? Finally, you say that
peace is not possible unless I let Brutus go free or supply him with corn.
What? Is this the opinion of those veterans who can still choose their own
course? Since you have sold yourselves for adulation and poisoned gifts, . .
. But you say you are bringing aid to beleaguered soldiers. I will not
hinder them from escaping and going where they please if they will let that
man perish who has deserved to perish. You write me that mention has been
made of peace in the Senate, and of five ambassadors of consular rank. It is
hard to believe that those who drove me headlong when I offered the fairest
conditions, and was even thinking of abating some part of them, can
contemplate any moderate or humane act. It is hardly probable that those who
voted Dolabella an enemy for his most righteous deed could spare me, who
hold the same sentiments with him. Wherefore you ought rather to reflect
whether it is more fitting, and more useful to our party, to avenge the
death of Trebonius or that of Caesar, and whether it is more
equitable for us to compete with each other in bringing to life the cause of
Pompey that has so often had its throat cut, or to combine, so that we be
not a laughing-stock to our enemies, who will be the gainers whichever of us
shall fall. Fortune itself has thus far shunned that spectacle, that it
might not behold two armies belonging to one body fighting each other, with
Cicero for trainer, who is a happy man in so far as he can deceive you with
the same compliments with which he boasted that he deceived Caesar.
I am resolved to endure no affront either to myself or to my friends, nor to
desert the party that Pompey hated, nor to allow the veterans to be moved
from their settlements or be put to the torture one by one; nor shall I come
short of the faith I pledged to Dolabella, nor violate my alliance with
Lepidus, that most conscientious man, nor betray Plancus, the partner of my
counsels. If the immortal gods aid me, as I hope, in my righteous course, I
shall be glad to live; but if another fate awaits me I shall enjoy your
punishment in advance, for if the Pompeians are so insolent when vanquished,
what they will be when victorious you will learn by experience rather than
myself. Finally, the sum and substance of my decision is this, I can bear
the injuries that my friends have done me if they are willing to forget that
they have done them, or if they are ready to join me in avenging
Caesar’s death. I do not believe that ambassadors are coming to the
theatre of war. When they do come I shall know what they demand.</quote>
<bibl>Cicero, <title>Phil.</title> xiii</bibl>
<note resp="translator">Cicero said that the only answer
made by Hirtius and Octavius to this letter was to move nearer to Antony’s
works. (<title>Phil.</title> xiii, 20.)</note></div>
</div>
</div>

<div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="book">
<head>BOOK IV</head>
 <div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER I</head>
<head>Reconciliation of Octavius and Antony — The New Triumvirate of Octavius,
Antony, and Lepidus — Plunder of Italy promised to Soldiers — Fearful
Prodigies at Rome</head>

<div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>THUS was punishment visited upon two of Caesar’s murderers, who were
conquered in their own provinces, Trebonius in Asia and Decimus Brutus in
Gaul. How vengeance overtook Cassius and Marcus Brutus, who were the
principal leaders in the conspiracy against Caesar, and who
controlled the territory from Syria to Macedonia, and had large forces of
cavalry and sailors, and more than twenty legions of infantry, together with
ships and money, this fourth book of the Civil Wars will show. During the
progress of these events came the pursuit and capture of the proscribed in
Rome and the sufferings consequent thereon, the like of which cannot be
recalled among the civil commotions or wars of the Greeks, or those of the
Romans themselves save only in the time of Sulla, who was the first to put
his enemies on a proscription list. Marius searched for his and punished
those whom he found, but Sulla proclaimed large rewards to persons who
should kill the proscribed and severe punishment to those who should conceal
them. But what took place in the time of Marius and Sulla I have previously
narrated in the history relating to them. The following events came next in
order. </p>
</div><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius and Antony composed their differences on a small, gradually sloping
islet in the river Lavinius, near the city of Mutina. Each had five legions
of soldiers whom they stationed opposite each other, after which each
proceeded with 300 men to the bridges over the river. Lepidus himself went
before them, searched the island, and shook his military cloak as a signal
to them to come. Then each left his three hundred in charge of friends on
the bridges and advanced to the middle of the island in plain sight, and
there the three sat together in council, Octavius in the centre because he
was consul. They were in conference from morning till night for two days,
and came to these decisions: That Octavius should resign the consulship and
that Ventidius should take it for the remainder of the year; that anew
magistracy for quieting the civil dissensions should be created by law,
which Lepidus, Antony, and Octavius should hold for five years with consular
power (for this name seemed preferable to that of dictator, perhaps because
of Antony’s decree abolishing the dictatorship); that these three should at
once designate the yearly magistrates of the city for the five years; that a
distribution of the provinces should be made, giving to Antony the whole of
Gaul except the part bordering the Pyrenees Mountains, which was called Old
Gaul. The latter, together with Spain, was assigned to Lepidus, while
Octavius was to have Africa, Sardinia, and Sicily, and the other islands in
the vicinity thereof. </p>
</div><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus was the dominion of the Romans divided by the triumvirate among
themselves. The assignment of the parts beyond the Adriatic only was
postponed, since these were still under the control of Brutus and Cassius,
against whom Antony and Octavius were to wage war. Lepidus was to be consul
the following year and to remain in the city to do what was needful there,
meanwhile governing Spain by proxy. He was to retain three of his legions to
guard the city, and to divide the other seven between Octavius and Antony,
three to the former and four to the latter, so that each of them might lead
twenty legions to the war. To encourage the army with the expectation of
booty they promised them, beside other gifts, eighteen cities of Italy as
colonies — cities which excelled in wealth, in the fertility of their
territory, and in handsome houses, and which were to be divided among them
(land, buildings, and all), just as though they had been captured from an
enemy in war. The most renowned among these were Capua, Rhegium, Venusia,
Beneventum, Nuceria, Ariminum, and Vibo.<note resp="translator">A town in Bruttium, called by the Greeks Hipponium — the
modern Monte Leone.</note> Thus were the most beautiful parts of Italy
marked out for the soldiers. But they decided to destroy their personal
enemies beforehand, so that the latter should not interfere with their
arrangements while they were carrying on war abroad. Having come to these
decisions, they reduced them to writing, and Octavius, as consul,
communicated them to the soldiers, all except the proscriptions. When the
soldiers heard them they applauded and embraced each other in token of
mutual reconciliation. </p>
</div><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While these transactions were taking place many fearful prodigies and
portents were observed at Rome. Dogs howled exactly like wolves — a fearful
sign. Wolves darted through the forum — an animal unused to the city.
Cattle used the human voice. A newly born infant spoke. Sweat issued from
statues; some even sweated blood. Loud voices of men were heard and the
clashing of arms and the tramp of horses where none could be seen. Many
fearful signs were observed around the sun, there were showers of stones,
and continuous lightning fell upon the sacred temples and images; in
consequence of which the Senate sent for diviners and soothsayers from
Etruria. The oldest of them said that the kingly rule of former times was
coming back, and that they would all be slaves except himself, whereupon he
closed his mouth and held his breath till he was dead.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER II</head>
<head>Proscription decreed by the Triumvirs — First Massacre — The Triumvirs
enter the City — Text of the Proscription</head>
<div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As soon as the triumvirs were by themselves they joined in making a list of
those who were to be put to death. They put on the list those whom they
suspected because of their power, and also their personal enemies, and they
swapped their own relatives and friends with each other for death, both then
and later. For they made additions to the catalogue from time to time, some
on the ground of enmity, others for a grudge merely, or because the victims
tims were friends of their enemies or enemies of their friends. Some were
proscribed on account of their wealth, for the triumvirs needed a great deal
of money to carry on the war, since the revenue from Asia had been paid to
Brutus and Cassius, who were still collecting it, and the kings and satraps
were coöperating with them. So the triumvirs were short of money
because Europe, and especially Italy, was exhausted by wars and exactions;
for which reason they levied very heavy contributions from the plebeians and
finally even from women, and contemplated taxes on sales and rents. Some
were proscribed because they had handsome villas or city residences. The
number of senators who were sentenced to death and confiscation was about
300, and of the so-called knights about 2000. There were brothers and uncles
of the triumvirs in the list of the proscribed, and also some of the
lieutenants serving under them who had had some difficulty with the leaders,
or with their fellow-lieutenants. </p>
</div><div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As they left the conference to proceed to Rome they postponed the
proscription of the greater number of victims, but they decided to send
executioners in advance and without warning to kill twelve, or, as some say,
seventeen, of the most important ones, among whom was Cicero. Four of these
were slain immediately, either at banquets or as they were met on the
streets. Search was made for the others in temples and houses. There was a
sudden panic which lasted through the night, and a running to and fro with
cries and lamentation as in a captured city. When it was known that men had
been seized and massacred, although nobody had been previously sentenced by
proscription, every man thought that he was the one whom the pursuers were
in search of. In despair some were on the point of burning their own houses,
and others the public buildings, or of committing some terrible deed in
their frenzied state before the blow should fall upon them; and they would
have done so had not the consul Pedius hurried around with heralds and
encouraged them, telling them to wait till daylight and get more accurate
information. When morning came Pedius, contrary to the intention of the
triumvirs, published the list of seventeen as deemed the sole authors of the
civil strife and the only ones condemned. To the rest he pledged the public
faith, being ignorant of the determinations of the triumvirs. Pedius died in
consequence of fatigue the following night. </p>
</div><div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The triumvirs entered the city separately on three successive days, Octavius,
Antony, and Lepidus, each with a praetorian cohort and one legion.
As they arrived, the city was speedily filled with arms and military
standards, disposed in the most advantageous places. A public assembly was
forthwith convened in the midst of these armed men, and the tribune Publius
Titius proposed a law providing for a new magistracy for settling the
present disorders, to consist of three men to hold office for five years,
namely, Lepidus, Antony, and Octavius, with the same power as consuls.
(Among the Greeks these would have been called harmosts, which is the name
the Lacedaemonians gave to those whom they appointed over their
subject states.) No time was given for consideration of this measure, nor
was a future day appointed for voting on it, but it was passed forthwith.
That same night, the proscription of 130 men in addition to the seventeen
was proclaimed in various parts of the city, and a little later 150 more,
and additions to the lists were constantly made of those who had been
previously condemned or killed by mistake, so that they might seem to have
perished justly. It was ordered that the heads of all the victims should be
brought to the triumvirs in order to adjust the rewards, which to a free
person were payable in money and to a slave in both money and freedom. All
were required to afford opportunity for searching their houses. Those who
received fugitives, or concealed them, or refused to allow search to be
made, were liable to the same penalties as the proscribed, and those who
informed against concealers were allowed the same rewards [as those who
killed the proscribed]. </p>
</div><div n="8" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The proscription was in the following words: <q rend="double">Marcus Lepidus, Mark Antony,
and Octavius Caesar, chosen by the people to set in order and
regulate the republic, do declare that, had not perfidious scoundrels begged
for mercy and when they obtained it become the enemies of their benefactors
and conspired against them, neither would Gaius Caesar have been
slain by those whom he saved by his clemency after capturing them in war,
whom he admitted to his friendship and upon whom he heaped offices, honors,
and gifts; nor should we have been compelled to use severity against those
who have insulted us and declared us public enemies. Now, seeing that the
malice of those, who have conspired against us and from whom Gaius
Caesar suffered, cannot be overcome by kindness, we prefer to
anticipate our enemies rather than suffer at their hands. Let no one who
sees what both Caesar and ourselves have suffered consider our
action unjust, cruel, or immoderate. Although Caesar was clothed
with supreme power, although he was pontifex maximus, although he had
overthrown and added to our sway the nations most formidable to the Romans,
although he was the first man to attempt the untried sea beyond the pillars
of Hercules and was the discoverer of a country hitherto unknown to the
Romans, this man was slain in a public and sacred place designated as the
senate-house, under the eyes of the gods, with twenty-three dastardly
wounds, by men whom he had taken prisoners in war and had spared, some of
whom he had named as co-heirs of his wealth. After this execrable crime,
instead of arresting the guilty wretches, the rest sent them forth as
commanders and governors, in which capacity they seized upon the public
money with which they are collecting an army against us and are seeking
reënforcements from barbarians ever hostile to Roman rule. Cities
subject to Rome that would not obey them they have burned, or ravaged, or
levelled to the ground; other cities they have forced by terror to bear arms
against the country and against us.</q> </p>
</div><div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">Some of them we have punished already; and by the aid of divine providence
you shall see the rest punished presently. Although the chief part of this
work has been finished by us or is well in hand, appertaining to Spain and
Gaul as well as to Italy, one task still remains, and that is to march
against Caesar’s assassins beyond the sea. On the eve of
undertaking this foreign war for you, we do not consider it safe, either for
you or for us, to leave other enemies behind to take advantage of our
absence and watch for opportunities during the war. We think that there
should be no delay in such an emergency, but that we ought rather to sweep
them out of our pathway, once for all, seeing that <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 712</note> they began the war against us
when they voted us and the armies under us public enemies.</q> </p>
</div><div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">What vast numbers of citizens have they doomed to destruction with us,
disregarding the vengeance of the gods and the reprobation of mankind! We
shall not deal harshly with any multitude of men, nor shall we count as
enemies all who have opposed us or plotted against us, or those
distinguished for their riches merely, their estates, or their high
position; nor shall we go to the same lengths as another man who held the
supreme power before us, when he, too, was regulating the commonwealth in
civil convulsions, and whom you named the Fortunate<note resp="translator">Sulla; see i. 97 <emph>supra.</emph></note>
on account of his success; and yet necessarily three persons will have more
enemies than one. We shall take vengeance only on the worst and most guilty.
This we shall do for your interest no less than for our own, for while we
keep up our conflicts you will all be involved necessarily in great dangers.
It is incumbent on us also to do something to quiet the army, which has been
insulted, irritated, and decreed a public enemy by our common foes. Although
we might arrest on the spot whomsoever we please, we prefer to proscribe
rather than seize them unawares; and this, too, on your account, so that it
may not be in the power of enraged soldiers to exceed their orders, but that
they may be restricted to a certain number designated by name, and spare the
others according to order.</q></p>
</div><div n="11" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">In God’s name then,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀγαθῇ τύχῃ τοίνυν</foreign>: an exclamation of a
religious sort equivalent to the Latin <foreign xml:lang="lat">quod felix faustumque
sit.</foreign> It has no exact equivalent in English.</note> let no
one harbor any one of those whose names are hereto appended, or conceal
them, or send them away, or be corrupted by their money. Whoever shall be
detected in saving, or aiding, or conniving with them we will put on the
list of the proscribed without allowing any excuse or pardon. Those who kill
the proscribed and bring us their heads shall receive the following rewards:
to a free man 25,000 Attic drachmas per head; to a slave his freedom and
10,000 Attic drachmas and his master’s right of citizenship. Informers shall
receive the same rewards. In order that they may remain unknown <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 711</note> the names of those
who receive the rewards shall not be inscribed in our registers.</q> Such was
the language of the proscription of the triumvirate as nearly as it can be
rendered from Latin into Greek.<note resp="translator">This is the only copy of this hideous instrument that has come down to
us. The text corresponds with all that we glean from other authorities
concerning it.</note></p>
</div></div>
 <div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER III</head>
<head>The Triumvirs put some of their Own Near Relatives on the List of the
Proscribed — Terrible Panic in the City — Domestic Servants as
Informers and Assassins — Scenes of Agony and Horror — Some Remarkable
Cases</head>
<div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Lepidus was the first to begin the work of proscription, and his brother
Paulus was the first on the list of the proscribed. Antony came next, and
the second name on the list was that of his uncle, Lucius
Caesar.<note resp="translator">Both Dion
and Appian say that Lucius Caesar and Lucius Paulus were
allowed to escape. See Sec. 37 <emph>infra.</emph></note> These
two men had been the first to vote Lepidus and Antony public enemies. The
third and fourth victims were relatives of the consuls-elect for the coming
year, namely, Plotius, the brother of Plancus, and Quintus, the
father-in-law of Asinnius. These four were placed at the head of the list,
not so much on account of their dignity as to produce terror and despair, so
that none of the proscribed might hope to escape. Among the proscribed was
Thoranius, who was said by some to have been a tutor of Octavius. When the
lists were published, the gates and all the other exits from the city, the
harbor, the marshes, the pools, and every other place that was suspected as
adapted to flight or concealment, were occupied by soldiers; the centurions
were charged to scour the surrounding country. All these things took place
simultaneously. </p>
</div><div n="13" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Straightway, throughout city and country, wherever each one happened to be
found, there were sudden arrests and murder in various forms, and
decapitations for the sake of the rewards when the head should be shown;
also undignified flights in strange costumes, of persons hitherto well
dressed. Some descended into wells, others into filthy sewers. Some took
refuge in chimneys. Others crouched in the deepest silence under the
thick-set tiles of their roofs. Some were not less fearful of their wives
and ill-disposed children than of the murderers. Others feared their
freedmen and their slaves; creditors feared their debtors and neighbors
feared neighbors who coveted their lands. There was a sudden outburst of
previously smouldering hates and a shocking change in the condition of
senators, consulars, praetors, tribunes (men who were about to
enter upon those offices, or who had already held them), who threw
themselves with lamentations at the feet of their own slaves, giving to the
servant the character of savior and master. It was most lamentable that even
after submitting to this humiliation they did not obtain pity. </p>
</div><div n="14" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Every kind of calamity was rife, but not as in ordinary sedition or military
occupation, for in those cases the people had to fear only the members of
the opposite faction, or the enemy, and could rely on their own domestics.
But now they were more afraid of them than of the assassins, for as the
former had nothing to fear on their own account, as in ordinary seditions or
wars, they were suddenly transformed from domestics into enemies, either
from some concealed hatred, or in order to obtain the published rewards, or
to possess themselves of the gold and silver in their masters’ houses. For
these reasons each one became treacherous to the household, preferring his
own gain to compassion for the home. Those who were faithful and
well-disposed feared to aid, or conceal, or connive at the escape of the
victims, because such acts made them liable to the very same punishments.
This was quite different from the peril that befell the seventeen men first
condemned. Then there was no proscription, but certain persons were arrested
unexpectedly, and as all feared similar treatment all sheltered each other.
After the proscriptions some immediately became the betrayers of all.
Others, being free from danger themselves and eager for gain, became hunting
dogs for the murderers for the sake of the rewards. Of the remainder, some
plundered the houses of the slain, and their private gains turned their
thoughts away from the public calamities; others, more prudent and upright,
were palsied with consternation. It seemed most astounding to them, when
they reflected upon it, that while other states afflicted by civil strife
had been rescued by harmonizing the factions, in this case the dissensions
of the leaders had wrought ruin in the first instance and their agreement
with each other had had like consequences afterwards. </p>
</div><div n="15" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Some died defending themselves against their slayers. Others made no
resistance, considering the assailants not to blame. Some starved, or
hanged, or drowned themselves, or flung themselves from their roofs or into
the fire. Some offered themselves to the murderers or sent for them when
they delayed. Others concealed themselves and made abject entreaties, or
dodged, or tried to buy themselves off. Some were killed by mistake, or by
private malice, contrary to the intention of the triumvirs. It was evident
that a corpse was not one of the proscribed if the head was still attached
to it, for the heads of the proscribed were displayed on the rostra in the
forum, where it was necessary to bring them in order to get the rewards.
Equally conspicuous were the fidelity and courage of others — of wives, of
children, of brothers, of slaves, who rescued the proscribed or planned for
them in various ways, and died with them when they did not succeed in their
designs. Some even killed themselves on the bodies of the slain. Of those
who made their escape some perished by shipwreck, ill luck pursuing them to
the last. Others were preserved, contrary to expectation, to become city
magistrates, commanders in war, and even to enjoy the honors of a triumph.
Such a display of paradoxes did this time afford. </p>
</div><div n="16" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>These things took place not in an ordinary city, not in a weak and petty
kingdom; but the deity thus smote the most powerful mistress of so many
nations and of land and sea, and so brought about, after a long period of
time, the present well-ordered condition. Other like events had taken place
in the time of Sulla and even before him in that of Gaius Marius. The most
notable of these calamities I have narrated in my history of those times, in
which was the added horror that the dead were cast away unburied. The
matters we are now considering are the more remarkable by reason of the
dignity of the triumvirs and especially of one of them, who, by means of his
character and good fortune, established the government on a firm foundation,
and left his lineage and name to those who now rule after him. I shall now
run over the most remarkable as well as the most shocking of these events,
which are all the more worthy to be remembered because they were the last of
the kind. I shall not speak of all, however, because the mere killing, or
flight, or subsequent return of those who were pardoned by the triumvirs at
a later period and passed undistinguished lives at home, is not worthy of
mention. I shall refer only to those which are calculated to astonish by
their extraordinary nature or to confirm what has already been said. These
events are many, and they have been written in numerous books by many Roman
historians successively. By way of summary, and to shorten my narrative, I
shall record a few of each kind in order to confirm the truth of each and to
illustrate the happiness of the present time.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER IV</head>
<head>The Tribune Salvius slain at a Banquet — Annalis and Thoranius betrayed
by their Sons — Flight and Pursuit of Cicero — He is killed — His
Head and Hand suspended from the Rostra — The Egnatii, Ballus and
Aruntius — The two Ligarii — Septimius betrayed by his Wife — Other
Depraved Women — Statius, Capito, and Vetulinus — Servants and their
Masters — Curious Incidents — The Cases of Varus and Largus — Rufus
is proscribed for the Sake of his House</head>
<div n="17" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The massacre began, as it happened, among those who were still in office, and
the first one slain was the tribune Salvius. His was, according to the laws,
a sacred and inviolable office, endowed with the greatest powers, even that
of imprisoning the consuls in certain circumstances. Salvius was the tribune
who had at first prevented the Senate from declaring Antony a public enemy,
but later he had coöperated with Cicero in everything. When he
heard of the agreement of the triumvirs, and of their hastening to the city,
he gave a banquet to his friends, believing that he should not have many
more opportunities for doing so. Soldiers burst in while the feast was going
on. Some of the guests started up in tumultuous alarm, but the centurion in
command ordered them to resume their places and remain quiet. Then, seizing
Salvius by the hair, just as he was, the centurion drew him as far as need
be across the table, cut off his head, and ordered the guests to stay where
they were and make no disturbance unless they wished to suffer a like fate.
So they remained after the centurion’s departure, stupefied and speechless,
till the most silent watches of the night, reclining by the side of the
tribune’s body. The second one slain was the praetor Minucius, who
was holding the comitia in the forum. Learning that the soldiers were
seeking him, he fled, and while he was still running about looking for a
hiding-place he changed his clothes, and then darted into a shop, sending
away his attendants and the insignia of his office. The attendants, moved by
shame and pity, lingered near the place, and thus unintentionally made the
discovery of the praetor more easy to his slayers. </p>
</div><div n="18" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Annalis, another praetor, was going around with his son, who was a
candidate for the quaestorship, and soliciting votes for him. Some
friends who accompanied him, and those who bore his insignia of office, when
they heard that he was on the list of the proscribed, ran away from him.
Annalis took refuge with one of his clients, who had in the suburbs a small,
mean apartment in every way despicable, where he remained safely concealed
until his son, suspecting that he had fled to this client, guided the
murderers to the place. The triumvirs gave him his father’s fortune and
raised him to the aedileship. As he was returning home drunk he
fell into a quarrel about something, and was killed by the same soldiers who
had killed his father. Thoranius, who was not then praetor but had
been such, and who was the father of a young man who was a scapegrace
generally, but had great influence with Antony, asked the centurions to
postpone his death for a short time, till his son could appeal to Antony for
him. They laughed at him, and said, <q rend="double">He has already appealed, but on the
other side.</q> When the old man knew this he asked for another very short
interval until he could see his daughter, and when he saw her he told her
not to claim her share of the inheritance lest her brother should ask for
her death also from Antony. It happened in the son’s case that, after
squandering his fortune in disgraceful ways, he was convicted of theft and
sentenced to banishment. </p>
</div><div n="19" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Cicero, who had held supreme power after Caesar’s death, as much as
a public speaker could, was proscribed, together with his son, his brother,
and his brother’s son and all of his household, his faction, and his
friends. He fled in a small boat, but as he could not endure the
seasickness, he landed and went to a country place of his own near
Caieta,<note resp="translator">All the codices say
Capua, but Schweighäuser gives two excellent reasons for
considering this a copyist’s mistake for Caieta, which Livy tells us was
the place. A third reason for so thinking is that Caieta was on the
sea-shore, whereas Capua was a considerable distance inland. If Appian
had written the word Capua he could hardly have said immediately
afterward that one of the two parties conveying the news to Antony took
ship for that purpose.</note> a town of Italy, which I visited to gain
knowledge of this lamentable affair, and here he remained quiet. While the
searchers were approaching (for of all others Antony sought for him most
eagerly and the rest did so for Antony’s sake), crows flew into his chamber
and awakened him from sleep by their croaking, and pulled off his
bed-covering until his servants, perceiving that this was a warning from one
of the gods, put him in a litter and again conveyed him toward the sea,
going cautiously through a dense thicket. Many soldiers were hurrying around
in squads inquiring if Cicero had been seen anywhere. Some people, moved by
good-will and pity, said that he had already put to sea; but a shoemaker, a
client of Clodius, who had been a most bitter enemy of Cicero, pointed out
the path to Laena, the centurion, who was pursuing with a small
force. The latter ran after him, and seeing slaves mustering for the defence
in much larger number than the force under his own command, he called out by
way of stratagem, <q rend="double">Come on, you centurions in the rear, this is the place.</q> 
whereupon the slaves, thinking that more soldiers were coming, were
terror-stricken. </p>
</div><div n="20" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Laena, although he had been once saved by Cicero when under trial,
drew his head out of the litter and cut it off, striking it three times, or
rather sawing it off by reason <figure>
<head>CICERO</head>
<figDesc>In the Hall of the Philosophers, Capitoline Museum,
Rome</figDesc>
</figure>
</p>
<p>of his inexperience. He also cut off the hand with which Cicero had written
the speeches against the tyranny of Antony and which he had entitled
Philippics in imitation of those of Demosthenes. Then some of the soldiers
hastened on horseback and others on shipboard to convey the good news
quickly to Antony. The latter was sitting in front of the tribunal in the
forum when Laena, a long distance off, showed him the head and hand
by lifting them up and shaking them. Antony was delighted beyond measure. He
crowned the centurion and gave him 250,000 Attic drachmas in addition to the
stipulated reward for killing the man who had been his greatest and most
bitter enemy. The head and hand of Cicero were suspended for a long time
from the rostra in the forum where formerly he had been accustomed to make
public speeches, and more people came together to behold this spectacle than
had previously come to listen to him. It is said that even at his meals
Antony placed the head of Cicero before his table, until he became satiated
with the horrid sight. Thus was Cicero, a man famous even yet for his
eloquence, and one who had rendered the greatest service to his country when
he held the office of consul, slain, and insulted after his death. His son
had been sent in advance to Brutus in Greece. Cicero’s brother, Quintus, was
captured, together with his son. He begged the murderers to kill him before
his son, and the son prayed that he might be killed before his father. The
murderers said that they would grant both requests, and, dividing themselves
into two parties, each taking one, killed them at the same time according to
agreement.<note resp="translator">A fragment of
Livy, preserved for us in the writings of Seneca Rhetor
(<title>Suasoriœ,</title> i. 7) gives us that historian’s
account of the death of Cicero. It is placed in the Appendix to Book IV,
together with other extracts from ancient writers touching the same
event.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="21" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The Egnatii, father and son, while embracing each other, died by the same
blow, and their heads were cut off while the remainder of their bodies were
still locked together. Balbus sent his son in advance of himself in flight
toward the sea in order that they might not be too conspicuous travelling
together, and he followed at a short interval. Somebody told him, either by
design or by mistake, that his son had been captured. He went back and
delivered himself to the murderers. It happened, too, that his son perished
by shipwreck. Thus did ill luck add to the calamities of the time. Aruntius
had a son who was not willing to fly without his father. The latter with
difficulty persuaded him to seek his safety because he was young. His mother
accompanied him to the city gates and returned only to bury her slain
husband. When she learned that her son also had perished at sea she starved
herself to death. Such examples were there of good and bad sons. </p>
</div><div n="22" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Two brothers of the name of Ligarius, being proscribed together, hid
themselves in an oven till their slaves found them, when one of them was
killed and the other fled. When the latter learned that his brother had
perished he threw himself from a bridge into the Tiber. Some fishermen
seized him thinking that he had fallen into the water instead of leaping in.
He resisted rescue and tried to throw himself into the river again. When he
was overcome by the fishermen he exclaimed, <q rend="double">You are not saving me, but
ruining yourselves by helping one who is proscribed.</q> Nevertheless they had
pity on him and saved him until some soldiers who were guarding the bridge
saw him, ran to him, and cut off his head. One of two brothers threw himself
into the river and one of his slaves searched for the body five days. At
last he found it, and as it was still possible to recognize it, he cut off
the head for the sake of the reward. The other brother had concealed himself
in a dung-heap and another slave betrayed him. The murderers disdained to go
into the heap, but thrust their spears into him and dragged him out. They
then cut off his head, just as he was, without washing it. Another one
seeing his brother arrested ran up to him, not knowing that he was himself
proscribed also, and said, <q rend="double">Kill me instead of him.</q><note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐμὲ κτείνατε πρὸ
τούτου.</foreign> This may mean, <q rend="double">kill me before him,</q> or <q rend="double">kill me
instead of him.</q> The latter was the meaning intended, but the centurion
interpreted it the other way for the sake of the jest.</note> The
centurion, having the proscription list at hand, said, <q rend="double">Your request is a
proper one, for your name comes before his.</q> And so saying, he killed both
of them in due order. Let these serve as examples in the case of brothers. </p>
</div><div n="23" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Ligarius was concealed by his wife, who communicated the secret to only one
female slave. Having been betrayed by the latter, she followed her husband’s
head as it was carried away, crying out, <q rend="double">I sheltered him; those who give
shelter are to share the punishment.</q> As nobody killed her or informed of
her, she came to the triumvirs and accused herself before them. Being moved
by her love for her husband they pretended not to see her. So she starved
herself to death. I have mentioned her in this place because she failed to
save her husband and would not survive him. I shall refer to those who were
successful in their devotion to their husbands when I speak of the men who
escaped. Other women betrayed their husbands infamously. Among these was the
wife of Septimius, who had an amour with a certain friend of Antony. Being
impatient to exchange this illicit connection for matrimony, she besought
Antony through her paramour<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐδεήθη τοῦ μοιχεύοντος αὐτὴν Ἀντωνίου.</foreign> This sentence is probably corrupt. The
translation is conjectural.</note> to rid her of her husband. Septimius
was at once put on the list of the proscribed. He learned this fact from his
wife, and in ignorance of his domestic ills prepared for flight. She, as
though with loving anxiety, closed the doors, and kept him until the
murderers came. The same day that her husband was killed she celebrated her
new nuptials. </p>
</div><div n="24" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Salassus escaped, and, not knowing what to do with himself, came back to the
city by night, thinking that the danger had mostly passed away. His house
had been sold. The janitor, who had been sold with the house, was the only
one who recognized him, and he received him in his room, promising to
conceal him and feed him as well as he could. Salassus told the janitor to
call his wife from her own house. She pretended to be very desirous to come,
but to be fearful of the night and distrustful of her servants, and said
that she would come at daybreak. When daylight came she went for the
murderers. The janitor, because she was delaying, ran to her house to hasten
her coming. When the janitor went out Salassus feared that he had gone to
lay a plot against him, and went up to the roof to watch what would happen.
Seeing that it was not the janitor but his wife who was bringing the
murderers, he precipitated himself from the roof. Fulvius fled to the house
of a female servant, who had been his mistress, and to whom he had given
freedom and a dowry on her marriage. Although she had been so well treated
by him she betrayed him on account of jealousy of the woman whom Fulvius had
married after his relations with her. Let these serve as examples of
depraved women. </p>
</div><div n="25" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Statius, the Samnite, who had had great influence with the Samnites during
the social war and who had been raised to the rank of a Roman senator for
his noble deeds, his wealth, and his lineage, and who was now eighty years
of age, was proscribed on account of his riches. He threw open his house to
the people and to his own slaves to carry away whatever they pleased. He
also scattered his property around with his own hand. When at last the house
was empty he closed the doors, set fire to it, and perished, and the fire
spread to many other parts of the city. Capito, through his half-opened
door, for a long time resisted those who had been sent against him, killing
them one by one. Finally, he was overpowered by numbers and slain after
killing single-handed many of his assailants. Vetulinus assembled around
Rhegium a large force of the proscribed and those who had fled with them,
and others from the eighteen cities which had been promised as rewards of
victory to the soldiers and who were indignant at such treatment. With these
men Vetulinus slew the centurions who were scouting thereabouts, until a
larger force was sent against him, and even then he did not desist, but
passed over to Sicily and joined Sextus Pompeius, who had mastered that
island and who received the fugitives. There he fought bravely until he was
defeated in several engagements. Then he sent his son and the remainder of
the proscribed who were with him to Messana, and when he saw that their boat
was passing the straits he dashed upon the enemy and was cut in pieces.<note resp="translator">That the text is defective here is
evident, for how could Vetulinus send his son across the straits to
Messana if he were already in Sicily? Schweighäuser met the
difficulty by substituting <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἔπ εμψεν</foreign>
for <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπέρασεν,</foreign>
<emph>i.e.,</emph> he opened communications with Sextus Pompeius,
instead of joining him in Sicily. Probably there is a lacuna in the
text.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="26" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Naso, having been betrayed by a freedman who had been his favorite, snatched
a sword from one of the soldiers, and, having killed his betrayer with it,
surrendered himself to the murderers. A slave who was devoted to his master
left the latter on a hill while he went to the sea-shore to hire a boat. On
his return he found that his master had been killed, and while he was
breathing his last the slave called out to him, <q rend="double">Wait a moment, my master.</q> 
whereupon he fell suddenly upon the centurion and slew him. Then he killed
himself, saying to his master, <q rend="double">Now you have consolation.</q> Lucius placed his
gold in the hands of his two most faithful freedmen and started for the
seashore. They ran away with it, and he turned around, despairing of his
life, and gave himself up to the murderers. Labienus, who had captured and
killed many persons in the time of the proscription of Sulla, thought that
he would be disgraced if he did not bear himself bravely under similar
circumstances. So he.went to his front door, seated himself in a chair, and
waited for the murderers. Cestius concealed himself in the fields among
faithful slaves. When he saw centurions running hither and thither with
weapons and the heads of the proscribed he could not endure the prolonged
fear. He persuaded the slaves to light a funeral pyre, so that they might
say that they were paying the last rites to the dead Cestius. They were
deceived by him and lighted the pyre accordingly, whereupon he leaped into
it. Aponius concealed himself securely, but, as he could not endure the
meanness of his diet, he came forth and delivered himself to slaughter.
Another proscript voluntarily seated himself in full view, and, as the
murderers delayed their coming, he strangled himself in public. </p>
</div><div n="27" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Lucius, the father-in-law of Asinius, who was then consul, fled by sea, but,
as he could not endure the anguish of the tempest, he leaped overboard.
Sisinius fled from his pursuers, exclaiming that he was not proscribed, but
that they had conspired against him on account of his money. They brought
him to the proscription list and told him to read his name on it, and while
he was reading killed him. Aemilius, not knowing that he was
proscribed and seeing another man pursued, asked the pursuing centurion who
the proscribed man was. The centurion, recognizing Aemilius,
replied, <q rend="double">You and he,</q> and killed them both. Cilo and Decius were going out
of the senate-house when they learned that their names were on the list of
the proscribed, but no one had yet gone in pursuit of them. They fled
incontinently through the city gates, and their running betrayed them to the
centurions whom they met on the road. Icilius, who was one of the judges in
the trial of Brutus and Cassius when Octavius presided over the tribunal
with his army, and who, when all the other judges deposited secret ballots
of condemnation, alone publicly deposited one of acquittal, now unmindful of
his former magnanimity and independence put his shoulder under a dead body
that was being conveyed to burial, and took a place among the carriers of
the bier. The guards at the city gates noticed that the number of
corpse-bearers was greater by one man than usual, but they did not suspect
the bearers. They only searched the bier to make sure that it was not
somebody counterfeiting a corpse, but, as the bearers fell into a dispute
with Icilius as not being a member of their trade, he was recognized by the
murderers and killed.<note resp="translator">See iii. 95
<emph>supra,</emph> where mention is made of the trial of
Brutus and Cassius <foreign xml:lang="lat">in absentia,</foreign> where one judge only
voted for acquittal and was afterwards put on the list of the
proscribed. Dion Cassius (xlvii. 49) refers to this man and gives him
the name of Sicilius Coronas, which the French editors of that author
(MM. Gros and Boissee) change to Icilius Coronas both on
grounds of palaeography and on the authority of Appian.
Plutarch refers to one Publicus Silicius, who was observed to shed tears
when the condemnation of Brutus was announced, and who was afterwards
put on the list of the proscribed for that reason. (<title>Life of
Brutus,</title> 27.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="28" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Varus, who was betrayed by a freedman, ran away, and after wandering from
mountain to mountain came to a marsh at Minturnae, where he stopped
to take rest. The inhabitants of Minturnae were mounting guard over
this marsh in search of robbers, and the agitation of the reeds revealed the
hiding-place of Varus. He was captured and said that he was a robber. He was
condemned to death and resigned himself to his fate, but as they were
preparing to subject him to torture to compel him to reveal his accomplices,
he could not bear such an indignity. <q rend="double">I forbid you, citizens of
Minturnae,</q> he said, <q rend="double">either to torture or to kill one who has been
a consul and — what is more important in the eyes of our present rulers —
also proscribed! If it is not permitted me to escape, I prefer to suffer at
the hands of my equals.</q> The Minturnians did not believe him. They
discredited his story until a centurion, who was scouting in that
neighborhood, recognized him, and cut off his head, leaving the remainder of
his body to the Minturnians. Largus was captured in the fields by soldiers
who were pursuing another man. They took pity on him because he had been
captured when they were not seeking him, and allowed him to escape in the
forest. Being pursued by others, he ran back to his first captors, saying,
 <q rend="double">I would rather that you, who had compassion on me, should kill me, so that
you may have the reward instead of those men.</q> Thus he recompensed them with
his death for their kindness to him. </p>
</div><div n="29" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Rufus possessed a handsome house near that of Fulvia, the wife of Antony,
which she had wanted to buy, but he would not sell it, and although he now
offered it to her as a free gift, he was proscribed. His head was brought to
Antony, who said it did not concern him and sent it to his wife.<note resp="translator">Valerius Maximus (ix. 5. 4) says
that the head of Caesetius Rufus, a senator, was brought to
Antony while he was sitting at a banquet, and that all the others turned
away their faces. <q rend="double">Antony ordered that it be brought nearer, and, after
looking at it carefully for some time, and while all were waiting to
hear what he would say, he remarked: <q rend="single">I have never known this
man.</q></q></note> She ordered that it be fastened to the front of his own
house instead of the rostra. Another man had a very handsome and well-shaded
country-place in which was a beautiful and deep grotto, on account of which
probably he was proscribed. He was taking the air in this grotto when the
murderers were observed by a slave, as they were coming toward him, but
still some distance off. The slave conveyed him to the innermost recess of
the grotto, dressed himself in his master’s short tunic, pretended that he
was the man and simulated alarm, and would have been killed on the spot had
not one of his fellow-slaves exposed the trick. In this way the master was
killed, but the people were so indignant that they gave the triumvirs no
rest until they had obtained from them the crucifixion of the slave who had
betrayed his master, and the freedom of the one who had tried to save him. A
slave revealed the hiding-place of Aterius and obtained his freedom in
consequence. He had the impudence to bid against the sons at the sale of the
dead man’s property, and insulted them grossly. They followed him everywhere
with silent tears till the people became exasperated, and the triumvirs made
him again the slave of the sons of the proscript, for doing more than was
needful. Such were the evils that befell the men.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER V</head>
<head>Children Proscribed for their Wealth — Sales of Confiscated Property —
Taxes imposed on Women — The Daughter of Hortensius makes a Public
Speech — The Triumvirs relax the Impost — Outrages committed by
Soldiers</head>
<div n="30" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The calamity extended to orphan children on account of their wealth. One of
these, who was going to school, was killed, together with the attendant, who
threw his arms around the boy and would not give him up. Atilius, who was
just assuming the virile toga, went, as was customary, with a procession of
friends to sacrifice in the temples. His name being put on the proscription
list unexpectedly, his friends and servants ran away. Left alone, and bereft
of his brilliant escort, he went to his mother. She was afraid to receive
him. As he did not consider it safe to ask help from anybody else after his
mother had failed him, he fled to a mountain. Hunger drove him down to the
plain, where he was captured by a robber and committed to a workhouse. The
delicate boy, unable to endure the toil, escaped to the high road with his
fetters, revealed himself to some passing centurions, and was killed. </p>
</div><div n="31" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While these events were taking place Lepidus enjoyed a triumph for his
exploits in Spain, and an edict was displayed in the following terms: <q rend="double">In
God’s name, let it be proclaimed to all men and women that they celebrate
this day with sacrifices and feasting. Whoever shall fail to do so shall be
put on the list of the proscribed.</q> Lepidus led the triumphal procession to
the Capitol, accompanied by all the citizens, who showed the external
appearance of joy, but were sad at heart. The houses of the proscribed were
gutted, but there were not many buyers of their lands. Some were ashamed to
add to the burdens of the unfortunate. Others thought that such property
would bring them bad luck, or that it would not be quite safe for them to be
seen with gold and silver in their possession, or that, as they were not
free from danger with their present holdings, it would be extra-hazardous to
increase them. Only the boldest spirits came forward and purchased at the
lowest prices, because they were the only buyers. Thus it came to pass that
the triumvirs, who had hoped to realize a sufficient sum for their
preparations, were short 20,000,000 of drachmas. </p>
</div><div n="32" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The triumvirs addressed the people on this subject and published an edict
requiring 1400 of the richest women to make a
valuation of their property, and to furnish for the service of the war such
portion as the triumvirs should require from each. It was provided further
that if any should conceal their property or make a false valuation they
should be fined, and that rewards should be given to informers, whether free
persons or slaves. The women resolved to beseech the female relatives of the
triumvirs. With the sister of Octavius and the mother of Antony they did not
fail, but they were repulsed from the doors of Fulvia, the wife of Antony,
whose rudeness they could scarce endure. They then forced their way to the
tribunal of the triumvirs in the forum, the people and the guards dividing
to let them pass. There, through the mouth of Hortensia, they spoke as
follows, according to previous arrangement: <q rend="double">As is befitting women of our
rank addressing a petition to you, we had recourse to your female relatives.
Having suffered unseemly treatment on the part of Fulvia, we have been
compelled by her to visit the forum. You have deprived us of our fathers,
our sons, our husbands, and our brothers, whom you accused of having wronged
you. If you take away our property also, you reduce us to a condition
unbecoming our birth, our manners, our sex. If we have done you wrong, as
you say our husbands have, proscribe us as you do them. If we women have not
voted you public enemies, have not torn down your houses, destroyed your
army, or led another one against you; if we have not hindered you in
obtaining offices and honors, — why do you visit upon us the same
punishment as upon the guilty, whose offences we have not shared?</q> </p>
</div><div n="33" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">Why should we pay taxes when we have no part in the honors, the commands,
the state-craft, for which you contend against each other with such harmful
results? <q rend="single">Because this is a time of war,</q> do you say? When have there not
been wars, and when have taxes ever been imposed on women, who are exempted
by their sex among all mankind? Our mothers once for all rose superior to
their sex and made contributions when you were in danger of losing the whole
empire and the city itself through the conflict with the Carthaginians. But
then they contributed voluntarily, not from their landed property, their
fields, their dowries, or their houses, without which life is not possible
to free women, but only from their own jewellery, and not according to fixed
valuation, not under fear of informers or accusers, not by force and
violence, but what they themselves were willing to give. Who now causes you
alarm for the empire or the country? Let war with the Gauls or the Parthians
come, and we shall not be inferior to our mothers in zeal for the common
safety; but for civil wars may we never contribute, nor ever assist you
against each other. We did not contribute to Caesar or to Pompey.
Neither Marius nor Cinna imposed taxes upon us. Nor did Sulla, who held
despotic power in the state, do so, whereas you say that you are
reëstablishing the commonwealth.</q><note resp="translator"><q rend="double">Hortensia, the daughter of Q. Hortensius, when the matrons
of Rome were burdened with a heavy tax by the triumvirs and no man dared
undertake their defence, pleaded the cause of the women before the
triumvirs with firmness and success. By the faithful reproduction of her
father’s eloquence she succeeded in getting the greater part of the
pecuniary impost remitted. Quintus Hortensius lived again in his female
line. He breathed once more in the words of his daughter. If his male
descendants had been willing to follow this vigorous example, the
eloquence of Hortensius, so great a heritage, would not have been
reduced to a single pleading of a woman.</q> (<title>Valerius
Maximus,</title> viii. 3, 3.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="34" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Hortensia had thus spoken the triumvirs were angry that women should
dare to hold a public meeting when the men were silent; that they should
demand from magistrates the reasons for their acts, and not furnish money
while the men were serving in the army. They ordered the lictors to drive
them away from the tribunal, which they proceeded to do until cries were
raised by the multitude outside, when the lictors desisted and the triumvirs
said they would postpone till the next day the consideration of the matter.
On the following day they reduced the number of women, who were to present a
valuation of their property, from 1400 to 400, and
decreed that all men who possessed more than 100,000 drachmas, both citizens
and strangers, freedmen and priests, and men of all nationalities without a
single exception, should (under the same dread of penalty and also of
informers) lend them at interest a fiftieth part of their property and
contribute one year’s income to the war expenses. </p>
</div><div n="35" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Such calamities befell the Romans from the orders of the triumvirs. Even
worse ones were visited upon them by the soldiers in disregard of orders.
Believing that they alone enabled the triumvirs to do what they were doing
with impunity, some of them asked for the confiscated houses, or fields, or
villas, or entire property of the proscribed. Others demanded that they
should be made the adopted sons of rich men. Others, of their own motion,
killed men who had not been proscribed, and plundered the houses of those
who were not under accusation, so that the triumvirs were obliged to publish
an edict that one of the consuls should put a restraint upon those who were
exceeding their orders. The consul did not dare to touch the soldiers lest
he should excite their rage against himself, but he seized and crucified
certain slaves who were masquerading as soldiers and committing outrages in
company with them. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VI</head>
<head>Examples of the Proscribed who escaped — The Brother of Lepidus and the
Uncle of Antony allowed to escape — Messala and Bibulus — Acilius and
Lentulus — Escape of Apuleius and Rheginus — How Oppius was saved by
his Son — The Metelli, Father and Son — Marcus and Restio saved by
Slaves — Faithful Freedmen — Daring Exploit of Pomponius — Strange
Battle between Two Fugitives — How Varro the Historian was saved — How
Virginius the Orator escaped to Sicily — Strange Adventures of Marcus
Lollius — Balbinus and Lepidus — The Son of Cicero escapes and is
restored to Favor</head>

<div n="36" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Such are examples of the extreme misfortunes that befell the proscribed.
Instances where some were unexpectedly saved and at a later period raised to
positions of honor are more agreeable to me to relate, and will be more
useful to my readers, as showing that hope should not be abandoned in
adverse circumstances. Some, who were able to do so, fled to Cassius, or to
Brutus, or to Africa, where Cornificius upheld the republican cause. The
greater number, however, went to Sicily because of its nearness to Italy,
where Sextus Pompeius received them gladly. The latter showed the most
admirable zeal in behalf of the unfortunate at this crisis, sending heralds
who invited all to come to him, and offered to those who should save the
proscribed, both slaves and free persons, double the rewards that had been
offered for killing them. His small boats and merchant ships met those who
were escaping by sea, and his war-ships sailed along the shore and made
signals to those wandering there and saved such as they found. Pompeius
himself met the newcomers and provided them at once with clothing and other
necessaries. To those who were worthy he assigned commands in his military
and naval forces. When, at a later period, he entered into negotiations with
the triumvirs, he would not conclude a treaty without embracing in its terms
those who had taken refuge with him. In this way he rendered to his
unfortunate country the greatest service, from which he gained a high
reputation of his own in addition to that which he had inherited from his
father, and not less than that. Others escaped by concealing themselves in
various ways, some in the fields or in the tombs, others in the city itself,
undergoing cruel anxiety until peace was restored. Remarkable examples were
shown of the love of wives for their husbands, of sons for their fathers,
and of slaves for their masters, quite beyond expectation. Some of the most
remarkable of these I shall now relate. </p>
</div><div n="37" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Paulus, the brother of Lepidus, made his escape to Brutus by the connivance
of the centurions who respected him as the brother of the triumvir. After
the death of Brutus he went to Miletus, which he refused to leave after
peace was restored, although he was invited to return. The mother of Antony
gave shelter to her brother Lucius, Antony’s uncle, without concealment, and
the centurions had respect for her for a long time as the mother of the
triumvir. When, later, they attempted to do violence to him, she dashed into
the forum where Antony was seated with his colleagues, and exclaimed, <q rend="double">I
denounce myself to you, triumvir, for having received Lucius under my roof
and for still keeping him, and I shall keep him till you kill us both
together, for it is decreed that those who give shelter shall suffer the
same punishment.</q> Antony reproached her for being an unreasonable mother,
although a good sister, saying that she ought to have prevented Lucius in
the first place from voting her son a public enemy instead of seeking to
save him now. Nevertheless, he procured from the consul Plancus a decree
restoring Lucius to citizenship. </p>
</div><div n="38" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Messala, a young man of distinction, fled to Brutus. The triumvirs, fearing
his high spirit, published the following edict: <q rend="double">Since the relatives of
Messala have made it clear to us that he was not in the city when Gaius
Caesar was slain, let his name be removed from the list of the
proscribed.</q> He would not accept pardon, but, after Brutus and Cassius had
fallen in Thrace, although there was a considerable army left, as well as
ships and money, and although strong hopes of success still existed, Messala
would not accept the command when it was offered to him, but persuaded his
associates to yield to overpowering fate and join forces with Antony. He
became intimate with Antony and adhered to him until the latter became the
slave of Cleopatra. Then he heaped reproaches upon him and joined himself to
Octavius, who made him consul in place of Antony himself when the latter was
deposed and again voted a public enemy. After the battle of Actium, where he
held a naval command against Antony, Octavius sent him as a general against
the revolted Celts and awarded him a triumph for his victory over them.<note resp="translator">See <title>Illyr.</title> 17
<emph>supra</emph> and v. 102 <emph>infra.</emph>
Messala was a distinguished orator as well as soldier. He is mentioned
in one of Cicero’s letters (<title>Ad Brutum,</title> 12) as having gone
to join Brutus in Macedonia about the time that Lepidus and Antony
joined forces in Gaul. His oratory is praised by Quintilian (x. 1. 13)
and his character by Velleius (ii. 71). He served under Brutus in the
battle of Philippi, and his account of it is quoted by Plutarch
(<title>Life of Brutus,</title> 40-42).</note> Bibulus was received
into favor at the same time with Messala, and was given a naval command by
Antony, and often served as an intermediary in the negotiations between
Octavius and Antony. He was appointed governor of Syria by Antony and died
while serving in that capacity. </p>
</div><div n="39" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Acilius fled from the city secretly. His hiding-place was disclosed by a
slave to the soldiers, but he prevailed upon them, by the hope of a larger
reward, to send some of their number to his wife with a private token that
he gave them. When they came she gave them all of her jewellery, saying that
she gave it in return for what they had promised, although she. did not know
whether they would keep their agreement. But her fidelity to her husband was
not disappointed, for the soldiers hired a ship for Acilius and conducted
him to Sicily. The wife of Lentulus asked that she might accompany him in
his flight and kept watch upon his movements for that purpose, but he was
not willing that she should share his danger, and fled secretly to Sicily.
Being appointed praetor there by Pompeius he sent word to her that
he was saved and elevated to office. When she learned in what part of the
earth her husband was she escaped with two slaves from her mother, who was
keeping watch over her. With these she travelled in the guise of a slave,
with great hardship and the meanest fare, until she was able to make the
passage from Rhegium to Messana about nightfall. She learned without
difficulty where the praetor’s tent was, and there she found
Lentulus, not in the attitude of a praetor, but on a low pallet
with unkempt hair and wretched food, mourning for his wife. </p>
</div><div n="40" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The wife of Apuleius threatened that, if he should fly without her, she would
give information against him. So he took her with him unwillingly, and he
succeeded in avoiding suspicion in his flight by travelling with his wife
and his male and female slaves in a public manner. The wife of Antius
wrapped him up in a clothes-bag and gave the bundle to some porters to carry
from the house to the sea-shore, whence he made his escape to Sicily. The
wife of Rheginus concealed him in a sewer by night. The soldiers were not
willing to follow him there in the daytime, on account of the foul odor. The
next night she fixed him up as a charcoal dealer, and furnished him an ass
to drive, carrying coals. She led the way at a short distance, borne in a
litter. One of the soldiers at the city gates suspected the litter and
searched it. Rheginus was alarmed and hastened his steps, and as he passed
along admonished the soldier not to give trouble to women. The latter, who
took him for a charcoal dealer, answered him angrily, but suddenly
recognizing him (for he had served under him in Syria), said, <q rend="double">Go on your
way rejoicing, general, for such I ought still to call you.</q> The wife of
Coponius obtained his safety by yielding herself to Antony, although she had
previously been chaste, thus curing one evil with another. </p>
</div><div n="41" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The son of Geta pretended to burn his father’s remains in the courtyard of
his house, making people believe that he had strangled himself. Then he
conveyed him secretly to a newly bought field and left him. There the old
man changed his appearance by putting a bandage over one of his eyes. After
the return of peace he took off the bandage and found that he had lost the
sight of that eye by disuse. Oppius, by reason of the infirmities of age,
was unwilling to fly, but his son carried him on his shoulder till he had
brought him outside the gates. The remainder of the journey as far as Sicily
he accomplished partly by leading and partly by carrying him, nobody
suspecting the trick and nobody troubling him. In like manner they say that
Aeneas was respected even by his enemies when carrying his father.
In admiration of his piety the people in later days elected the young man to
the aedileship, and since his property had been confiscated and he
could not defray the expenses of the office [for public games], the artisans
performed the work appertaining thereto without pay, and each of the
spectators tossed such money as he could afford to give into the
orchestra,<note resp="translator">The orchestra of a
Roman theatre was the place reserved for the Senate.</note> so that he
became a rich man. By the will of Arrianus the following inscription was
engraved on the father’s tomb: <q rend="double">Here lies one who, when proscribed, was
concealed by his son, who had not been proscribed, but who fled with him and
saved him.</q> </p>
</div><div n="42" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>There were two men named Metellus, father and son. The father held a command
under Antony at the battle of Actium and was taken prisoner, but not
recognized. The son fought on the side of Octavius and held a command under
him at the same battle. When Octavius looked over the prisoners at Samos the
son was sitting with him. The old man was led forward covered with hair,
misery, and dirt, and completely metamorphosed by them. When his name was
called by the herald in the array of prisoners the son sprang from his seat,
and, with difficulty recognizing his father, embraced him with a cry of
anguish. Then restraining his lamentation he said to Octavius, <q rend="double"><hi rend="ital">He</hi>
was your enemy, I was your fellow-soldier. He has earned your punishment, I
your reward. I ask you either to spare my father on my account, or to kill
me at the same time on his account.</q> There was much emotion on all sides,
and Octavius spared Metellus, although he had been bitterly hostile to
himself and had scorned many offers made to him to desert Antony. </p>
</div><div n="43" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The slaves of Marcus guarded him with fidelity and success within his own
house during the whole period of the proscription until there was nothing
more to fear, when Marcus came out of his house as though from exile.
Hirtius escaped from the city with his household servants and traversed
Italy releasing prisoners, collecting runaways, and ravaging small towns at
first and afterward large ones, until he found himself possessed of
sufficient force to master Bruttium. When an army was sent against him he
crossed the straits with his forces and joined Pompeius. When Restio fled,
thinking that he was alone, he was followed secretly by a slave, who had
been brought up by himself and had been very well treated by him formerly,
but had lately been branded for bad conduct. While Restio was stopping in a
marsh the slave came up to him. He was startled at the sight, but the slave
said that he did not feel the pain of the brand so much as he remembered the
former kindness shown to him. Then he found a resting-place for his master
in a cave, and by working procured such sustenance for him as he could. The
soldiers in the neighborhood of the cave had their suspicions aroused
concerning Restio, and went to it. The slave observed their movements and
followed them, and, seeing an old man walking in front of them, he ran up
and killed him and cut off his head. The soldiers were astounded. They
arrested him for a highwayman, but he said, <q rend="double">I have killed Restio, my
master, the man who marked me with these scars.</q> The soldiers took the head
from him for the sake of the reward, and made haste to the city to no
purpose. The slave brought his master away and conveyed him by ship to
Sicily.<note resp="translator">The tale of Antius
Restio and his slave is related in nearly the same words by Valerius
Maximus (vi. 8. 7).</note>
</p>
</div><div n="44" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Appion was resting at his country-place when the soldiers burst in. A slave
put on his master’s clothes and threw himself on his bed and voluntarily
died for his master, who was standing beside him dressed as a slave.<note resp="translator">This tale is related at greater
length by Valerius Maximus (xi. 8. 6), who gives the name of the master
as Urbinius Panopion.</note> When the soldiers made a descent upon the
house of Menenius, one of his slaves got into his master’s litter and
procured himself to be carried by his fellow-slaves, and in this way allowed
himself to be killed for Menenius, who thereby escaped to Sicily. Vinius had
a freedman named Philemon, the owner of a splendid mansion, who concealed
him in the inmost recess thereof, in an iron chest used for holding money or
manuscripts, and gave him food in the night-time, until the return of
peace.<note resp="translator">Suetonius
(<title>Aug.</title> 27) gives this freedman the name of T. Vinius
Philopœmen.</note> Another freedman, who had the custody of
his master’s tomb, guarded his master’s son, who had been proscribed, in the
tomb with his father. Lucretius, who had been wandering about with two
faithful slaves and had become destitute of food, set out to find his wife
and was carried in a litter, in the guise of a sick man, by the slaves to
the city. One of the slaves broke his leg and walked leaning upon the other
with his hand. When they reached the gate where the father of Lucretius, who
had been proscribed by Sulla, had been captured, he saw a cohort of soldiers
coming out. Being unnerved by the coincidence, he concealed himself with one
of the slaves in a tomb. When some tomb-robbers came there searching for
plunder, the slave offered himself to these robbers to be stripped till
Lucretius could escape to the city gate. There Lucretius waited for him and
shared his clothing with him, and then went to his wife, by whom he was
concealed between the planks of a double roof until his friends got his name
erased from the proscription. After the restoration of peace he was raised
to the consulship. </p>
</div><div n="45" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Sergius was concealed at the house of Antony himself until Antony persuaded
the consul Plancus to procure a decree of amnesty for him. At a later
period, when Octavius and Antony had fallen into disagreement, and when the
Senate was voting Antony a public enemy, Sergius alone cast his vote openly
in the negative. The following named persons were saved as I shall now
relate. Pomponius arrayed himself in the garb of a praetor and
disguised his slaves as his official attendants. He passed through the city
as a praetor attended by lictors, his attendants pressing close to
him lest he should be recognized. At the city gates he took possession of
public carriages and traversed Italy in the character of a praetor
sent by the triumvirs to conduct negotiations with Pompeius, all the people
receiving him and sending him on as such, until he entered into a public
ship and passed over to Pompeius.<note resp="translator">Valerius Maximus (vii. 3. 9) relates this adventure, but gives to the
false praetor the name of Sentius Saturninus Vetulio. Velleius
(ii. 77) mentions the latter as restored to citizenship by the treaty
made with Sextus Pompeius.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="46" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Apuleius and Aruntius assumed the character of centurions, armed their slaves
as soldiers, and passed through the gates pretending to be in pursuit of
other persons. For the remainder of their course they took different roads.
They released prisoners and collected fugitives until a sufficient force was
obtained by each to display the standards, the equipment, and the appearance
of an army. When they arrived at the sea-shore they took position on either
side of a certain hill and contemplated each other with great apprehension.
At daybreak the next morning, after reconnoitring each other from the
hillside, each army took the other for an army sent against itself, and they
actually came to blows and fought until they discovered their error, when
they dropped their arms and broke into lamentations, blaming the hard fate
that pursued them everywhere. Then they took ship, and one of them sailed to
Brutus and the other to Pompeius. The latter was included in the
reconciliation with Pompeius. The former took command of Bithynia for
Brutus, and when Brutus fell he surrendered Bithynia to Antony and was
restored to citizenship. When Ventidius was proscribed one of his freedmen
put fetters on him as though intending to deliver him to the murderers. But
at night he gave instructions to some slaves, whom he armed as soldiers, and
then he led his master forth in the character of a centurion, and traversed
the whole of Italy as far as Sicily, and often passed the night in company
with other centurions who were in search of Ventidius. </p>
</div><div n="47" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Another proscript was concealed by a freedman in a tomb, but as he could not
endure the horror of the place he was transferred to a miserable hired
hovel. A soldier was lodged near him, and as he could not endure this fear
he changed from a feeling of cowardice to the most wonderful audacity. He
cut off his hair and opened a school in Rome itself, which he taught until
the return of peace. Volusius was proscribed while holding the office of
aedile. He had a friend who was a priest of Isis, whose robe he
begged. He clothed himself with this linen garment reaching to his feet, put
on the dog’s head, and thus celebrating the mysteries of Isis he made the
journey to Pompeius. The inhabitants of Cales<note resp="translator">A town of Campania a short distance northwest of Capua —
the modern Calvi.</note> protected Sittius, one of their citizens who
had made lavish expenditures from his own fortune for their benefit, and
provided an armed guard for him. They silenced his slaves by threats and
prevented the soldiers from approaching their walls until the troubles began
to subside, when they sent envoys to the triumvirs on his behalf and
obtained for Sittius that he might remain at home, but should be excluded
from the rest of Italy. Sittius was the first or the only man who was ever
an exile in his own country. Varro was a philosopher and a historian, a
soldier and a distinguished general, and for these reasons perhaps was
proscribed as hostile to the monarchy. His friends were eager to give him
shelter and contended with each other for the honor of doing so. Calenus won
the privilege and took him to his country house, where Antony was accustomed
to stop when travelling. Yet no slave, either of Calenus or of Varro
himself, revealed the fact that Varro was there.<note resp="translator">This is the same Varro who is mentioned in Bk.
ii. Sec. 9 <emph>supra</emph> as the writer of a book entitled the
 <q rend="double">Three Headed Monster.</q></note>
</p>
</div><div n="48" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Virginius, an orator of distinction, told his slaves that if they should kill
him for a small and uncertain reward they would be filled with remorse and
terror afterward, while if they should save him they would enjoy an
excellent reputation and good hopes, and, later, a much larger and more
certain reward. So they fled, taking him with them in the guise of a
fellow-slave, and when he was recognized on the road they fought against the
soldiers. Being captured by the latter, he told them that they had no reason
for killing him except for money, and that they would get a more honorable
reward and a larger one by going with him to the sea-shore, <q rend="double">where,</q> said
he, <q rend="double">my wife has arranged to bring a ship with money.</q> They followed his
suggestion and went with him to the sea-shore. His wife had come to the
rendezvous according to agreement, but as Virginius had been delayed, she
thought that he had already sailed to Pompeius. So she had embarked, leaving
a slave at the rendezvous, however, to tell him if he should come. When the
slave saw Virginius he ran up as though to his master, and pointed out to
him the ship which had just started, and told him about his wife and the
money and why he (the slave) had been left behind. The soldiers now believed
all that they heard, and when Virginius asked them to wait till his wife
could be called back, or to go with him after her to obtain the money, they
embarked in a small boat and conveyed him to Sicily, rowing with all their
might. There they received what had been promised them, and they did not go
back, but remained in his service until peace was declared. A ship captain
received Rebilus in his vessel in order to convey him to Sicily and then
demanded money, threatening to betray him if he did not get it. Rebilus
followed the example of Themistocles when he fled. He threatened in turn
that he would tell how the captain was helping a proscript to escape for
money. The captain was afraid, and he carried Rebilus over to Pompeius.<note resp="translator">When Themistocles fled from Athens
to the King of Persia the ship in which he was conveyed was driven by a
storm to an encampment of Athenians who were besieging Naxos. His
identity was not known to anybody on the ship. <q rend="double">He now alarmed the
captain by telling who he was and why he was fleeing, and said that,
unless the captain should rescue him, he would tell that he was
conveying him away for a bribe. He added that their safety could be
secured if nobody was allowed to leave the ship until the voyage was
finished,</q> etc. (<title>Thucydides,</title> i. 137.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="49" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Marcus was one of the lieutenants of Brutus and was proscribed for that
reason. When Brutus was defeated he was captured. He pretended to be a slave
and was bought by Barbula. The latter, perceiving that he was skilful,
placed him over his fellow-slaves and gave him charge of his private
disbursements. As he was clever in all respects and superior in intelligence
to the condition of a slave, his master had suspicions and encouraged him to
hope that if he would confess that he was one of the proscribed he (Barbula)
would procure his pardon. He denied stoutly, and gave himself a feigned name
and family and former masters. Barbula brought him to Rome, expecting that
if he were a proscript he would show reluctance to come, but he followed all
the same. One of Barbula’s friends, who met him at the gates, saw Marcus
standing by his side in the character of a slave, and privately told Barbula
who he was. The latter obtained from Octavius, through the intercession of
Agrippa, the erasure of the name of Marcus from the proscription. The latter
became a friend of Octavius, and some time later served as his lieutenant
against Antony at the battle of Actium. Barbula was then serving with
Antony, and the fortune of both of them was reversed. For when Antony was
vanquished Barbula was taken prisoner and he pretended to be a slave, and
Marcus bought him, pretending not to know him. Then he laid the whole matter
before Octavius and asked that he might compensate Barbula with a like
service, and his request was granted. Like good fortune attended them in
after times, for they both held the chief magistracy in the city the same
year.<note resp="translator">Schweighäuser
was not able to find any trace of consuls bearing these names, but
Mendelssohn refers us to Borghesi (v. 289), from which it appears that
Marcus Lollius and Q. Aemilius Lepidus Barbula were consuls in
the year of Rome 733, <emph>i.e.</emph> ten years after the battle
of Actium.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="50" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Balbinus took refuge with Pompeius and was restored with him, and became
consul not long afterward. Lepidus, who had meanwhile been deposed from the
triumvirate by Octavius and reduced to private life, presented himself to
Balbinus under the following stress. Maecenas prosecuted the son of
Lepidus for <emph>lèse-majeste</emph> against
Octavius and also the young man’s mother as knowing to the crime. Lepidus
himself he overlooked as being a person of no consequence. Maecenas
sent the son to Octavius at Actium, but in order to spare his mother the
journey on account of her sex, he demanded that she should give bail to the
consul for her appearance before Octavius. As nobody offered bail for her,
Lepidus presented himself frequently at the door of Balbinus and also at his
tribunal, and though the attendants long forced him away, he made himself
heard with difficulty to this effect: <q rend="double">The accusers testify to my innocence,
since they say that I was not an accomplice of my wife and son. I did not
cause you to be proscribed, yet I am now inferior to the proscribed.
Consider the mutability of human affairs and grant to one, who stands by
your side, the favor of becoming security for my wife’s appearance before
Octavius, or let me go there with her.</q> When Lepidus had thus spoken,
Balbinus took pity on his reverse of fortune and released his wife from bail
altogether. </p>
</div><div n="51" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Cicero, the son of Cicero, had been sent away to Greece by his father, who
anticipated these evils. From Greece he proceeded to join Brutus, and after
the latter’s death he joined Pompeius, by both of whom he was honored with a
military command. Afterward Octavius, by way of apology for his betrayal of
Cicero, caused him to be appointed augur, and not long afterward consul and
then proconsul of Syria. When the news of the overthrow of Antony at Actium
was forwarded by Octavius this same Cicero, as consul, announced it to the
people and affixed it to the rostra where formerly his father’s head had
been exhibited. Appius distributed his goods among his slaves and then
sailed with them to Sicily. Being overtaken by a storm, the slaves formed a
plot to get possession of his money, and placed Appius in a small boat,
pretending to transfer him to a safer place; but it turned out that he
reached port most unexpectedly, while their ship was wrecked and they all
perished. Publius, quaestor of Brutus, was solicited by the party
of Antony to betray his chief, but refused, and was for that reason
proscribed. Afterward he was restored to citizenship and became a friend of
Octavius. Once when Octavius came to visit him Publius showed him some
images of Brutus, and Octavius praised him for doing so. Such were some of
the most remarkable cases where the proscribed were lost or saved. Many
others I have omitted.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VII</head>
<head>The War in the Provinces — Cornificius and Sextius in Africa — The
Adventures of Publius Sittius — A Battle at Utica — End of the War in
Africa</head>
<div n="52" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While these transactions were taking place at Rome all the outlying countries
were torn by hostilities growing out of the same commotion. Chief among
these wars was the one in Africa between Cornificius and Sextius, the one in
Syria between Cassius and Dolabella, and the one against Pompeius around
Sicily. Many cities suffered the calamity of capture by siege. I shall pass
by the smaller ones and confine myself to the largest, and especially the
very celebrated ones of Laodicea, Tarsus, Rhodes, Patara, and Xanthus. I
shall relate briefly what took place at each of these. </p>
</div><div n="53" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>That part of Africa which the Romans took from the Carthaginians they still
call Old Africa. The part that belonged to King Juba, and which was taken by
Gaius Caesar at a later period, they call for that reason New
Africa; it might also be called Numidian Africa. Accordingly Sextius, who
held the government of New Africa as the appointee of Octavius, summoned
Cornificius to abandon Old Africa to him because the whole country had been
assigned to Octavius in the allotment of the triumvirs. Cornificius replied
that he did not know what allotment the triumvirs had made among themselves,
and that since he had received the government from the Senate he would not
surrender it to anybody else without the order of the Senate. This was the
origin of hostilities between them. Cornificius had the heavier and more
numerous army. That of Sextius was more nimble though inferior in number, by
which means he was enabled to dash around and detach from Cornificius his
inland districts until he was besieged by Ventidius, a lieutenant of
Cornificius, who brought against him superior forces and whom he resisted
valiantly. Laelius, another lieutenant of Cornificius, ravaged the
province of Sextius, sat down before the city of Cirta, and laid siege to
it. </p>
</div><div n="54" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Both parties sent ambassadors to secure the alliance of King Arabio and of
the so-called Sittians, who received their name from the following
circumstance. A certain Sittius,<note resp="translator">Publius Sittius Nucerinus was a robber on a large scale. He was at the
head of a band in Africa sufficiently large to be called an army at the
time of Catiline’s conspiracy, and Catiline claimed him as an ally at
that time (Sallust, <title>Cat.</title> 21). He rendered important aid
to Caesar in Africa by falling upon Juba’s rear when the latter
was advancing with an army to the aid of the Pompeians. After the battle
of Thapsus he demolished the remnant of the hostile force under the
command of Saburra, killing the latter and taking Faustus Sulla and
Afranius prisoners (Hirtius, <title>Bell. Afr.</title> 25, 36,
95).</note> who was under accusation at Rome, took flight in order to
avoid trial. Collecting an army from Italy and Spain, he crossed over to
Africa, where he allied himself now with one and now with another of the
warring kings of that country. As those with whom he joined himself were
always victorious, Sittius acquired a reputation and his army became
wonderfully efficient. When Gaius Caesar pursued the Pompeians to
Africa Sittius joined him and destroyed Juba’s famous general, Saburra, and
received from Caesar, as a reward for these services, the territory
of Masinissa, not all, but the best part of it. Masinissa was the father of
this Arabio and the ally of Juba. Caesar gave his territory to this
Sittius, and to Bocchus, the king of Mauritania, and Sittius divided his own
portion among his soldiers. Arabio then fled to the sons of Pompey in Spain.
He returned to Africa after Caesar’s death and kept sending to the
younger Pompeius detachments of his men, whom he received back in a state of
good training. He expelled Bocchus from his territory and killed Sittius by
stratagem. Although for these reasons he was friendly toward the Pompeians,
he nevertheless decided against that party, because it was so extremely
unlucky, and joined Sextius, through whom he acquired the favor of Octavius.
The Sittians also joined him by reason of their friendship for the elder
Caesar. </p>
</div><div n="55" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus encouraged Sextius made a sortie by which Ventidius was killed and his
army put to headlong flight. Sextius pursued them, killing and taking
prisoners. When Laelius heard the news he raised the siege of Cirta
and joined Cornificius. Sextius, elated by his success, advanced against
Cornificius himself at Utica and encamped opposite him, although the latter
had the superior force. Cornificius sent Laelius with his cavalry
to make a reconnoissance, and Sextius ordered Arabio to engage him with his
own cavalry in front, and Sextius himself with his light troops fell upon
the enemy’s flank and threw them into such confusion that Laelius,
although not vanquished, feared lest his retreat should be cut off and took
possession of a hill near by. Arabio hung upon his rear, killed many, and
surrounded the hill. When Cornificius saw this he sallied out with a larger
force to assist Laelius. Sextius, who was in his rear, dashed up
and attacked him, but Cornificius turned upon him and drove him back,
although suffering severely. </p>
</div><div n="56" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Meanwhile Arabio, with a band of men accustomed to climbing rocks, scaled a
precipice to the camp of Cornificius and stole into it unobserved. When the
camp was captured Roscius, the custodian, offered his throat to one of his
assistants and was killed. Cornificius, overcome by the fatigue of the
engagement, retired toward Laelius on the hill, not yet knowing
what had happened to his camp. While he was retreating the cavalry of Arabio
charged upon him and killed him, and when Laelius, looking down
from the hill, saw what had happened he killed himself. When the leaders had
fallen the soldiers fled in various directions. Of the proscribed who were
with Cornificius, some crossed over to Sicily, others took refuge wherever
they could. Sextius gave great spoils to Arabio and the Sittians. He brought
the cities into allegiance to Octavius and granted pardon to all. This was
the end of the war in Africa between Sextius and Cornificius, which seemed
inconsiderable by reason of the rapidity with which it was prosecuted.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="8" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VIII</head>
<head>Brutus and Cassius — How Cassius raised an Army in Syria — He gains
Four Legions from Egypt — Cassius marches against Dolabella — He
captures Laodicea — Dolabella killed — Brutus informs Cassius that
Octavius and Antony are crossing the Adriatic — Cassius captures
Tarsus</head>
<div n="57" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Resuming the narrative of Cassius and Brutus, I shall repeat some small part
of what has already been said, in order to refresh the memory. When
Caesar was assassinated his murderers took possession of the
Capitol, and when amnesty was voted to them they came down. The people were
greatly moved at Caesar’s funeral and scoured the city in pursuit
of his murderers. The latter defended themselves from the roofs of their
houses, and those of them who had been appointed by Caesar himself
as governors of provinces departed from the city forthwith. Cassius and
Brutus were still city praetors. Cassius had been chosen by
Caesar as governor of Syria and Brutus of Macedonia. As they could
not enter at once upon these offices, and as they were afraid to remain in
the city, they took their departure while still praetors, and the
Senate, for the sake of appearances, gave them charge of the supply of corn,
so that they might not seem to have taken flight in the interval. After they
had gone, the provinces of Syria and Macedonia were transferred to the
consuls Dolabella and Antony much against the will of the Senate.
Nevertheless, Cyrene and Crete were given to Brutus and Cassius in exchange.
These provinces they despised because of their insignificance, and,
accordingly, they set about raising troops and money in order to invade
Syria and Macedonia. </p>
</div><div n="58" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While they were thus engaged Dolabella put Trebonius to death in Asia and
Antony besieged Decimus Brutus in Cisalpine Gaul. The Senate in indignation
voted both Dolabella and Antony public enemies, and restored both Brutus and
Cassius to the former commands and added Illyria to that of Brutus. It also
ordered all other persons holding commands of Roman provinces or armies,
between the Adriatic and Syria, to obey the orders of Cassius and Brutus.
Thereupon Cassius anticipated Dolabella by entering Syria, where he raised
the standards of a governor and won over twelve legions of soldiers who had
been enlisted and trained by Gaius Caesar long before. One of these
Caesar had left in Syria when he was contemplating a war against
the Parthians, and had placed it under the charge of Caecilius
Bassus, but had given the nominal command to Sextus Julius, a young man who
was his kinsman.<note resp="translator">The text here is
almost identical with that which describes the same events in Book iii.
77, 78.</note> This Julius was a fellow of loose habits who led the
legion into shameful dissipations and once insulted Bassus when the latter
remonstrated with him. Afterward he summoned Bassus to his presence, and
when the latter delayed he ordered that he be dragged before him. There was
a disgraceful tumult in consequence, and some blows were given to Bassus,
the sight of which the army resented, and Julius was stabbed. This act was
followed straightway by repentance and fear of Caesar, and so they
bound each other by an oath that, unless they were granted pardon and
reconciliation, they would fight to the death; and they compelled Bassus to
take the same oath. They recruited another legion and both were drilled
together. Caesar sent Statius Murcus against them with three
legions, but they resisted bravely. Marcius Crispus was then sent from
Bithynia to the aid of Murcus with three additional legions, and thus Bassus
was besieged by six legions altogether. </p>
</div><div n="59" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Cassius speedily intervened in this siege and took command at once of the
army of Bassus with its consent, and afterward of the legions of Murcus and
Marcius, who surrendered them to him in a friendly way and in pursuance of
the decree of the Senate, which they obeyed in all respects. About the same
time Allienus, who had been sent to Egypt by Dolabella, brought from that
country four legions composed of men who had been dispersed after the
disasters of Pompey and Crassus, and who had been left with Cleopatra by
Caesar. Cassius surrounded him in Palestine unexpectedly, while he
was in ignorance of what had happened, and compelled him to come to terms
and surrender his army, as he did not dare to fight with four legions
against eight. Thus in a marvellous manner Cassius came into possession of
twelve first-rate legions, to whom were added a certain number of Parthian
mounted bowmen, who were attracted by the reputation he had acquired among
them from the time when, as quaestor to Crassus, he had shown
himself to be more skilful than that general. </p>
</div><div n="60" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Dolabella was spending his time in Ionia, having put Trebonius to death,
levied tribute on the towns, and hired a naval force, by means of Lucius
Figulus, from the Rhodians, Lycians, Pamphylians, and Cilicians. When this
was in readiness he advanced toward Syria, leading two legions by land while
Figulus proceeded by sea. After he had learned of the forces of Cassius he
passed on to Laodicea,<note resp="translator">There were
five Laodiceas in the dominions of the Seleucidae, all named
after the mother of Seleucus (<title>Syr.</title> 57). This one was on
the coast of Syria, the modern Latikiyeh.</note> a city friendly to
himself, situated on a peninsula, fortified on the landward side and having
a roadstead in the sea, so that supplies might be easily obtained by water
and he might sail away securely whenever he wished. When Cassius learned
this, fearing lest Dolabella should escape him, he threw up a mound across
the isthmus, two stades in length, composed of stones and all sorts of
material brought together from suburban houses and tombs, and at the same
time sent to Phoenicia, Lycia, and Rhodes for ships.<note resp="translator">Among the letters of Cicero are two written by P.
Lentulus, the quaestor of Trebonius, dated Perge, Pamphylia,
May 29 and June 2, the former to Cicero and the latter to the Senate,
which throw light on the movements of Dolabella before he shut himself
up in Laodicea. He says that he has learned from deserters from
Dolabella’s army that before throwing himself into the latter place
Dolabella tried to get possession of Antioch, but was not allowed to
enter. <q rend="double">Then he made several attempts to gain entrance by force, but was
each time repulsed with severe loss. After losing about a hundred men he
fled by night from Antioch in the direction of Laodicea, leaving his
sick and wounded. That night nearly all of his Asiatic troops deserted
him, and 800 of them returned to Antioch and surrendered themselves to
the officers whom Cassius had left to guard the town. The remainder, of
whom my informants were a part, came into Cilicia by way of Mount
Amanus. They said that Cassius, with his entire army, was only four
days’ march from Laodicea when Dolabella started thither, for which
reason I am confident that this most infamous robber will get his
deserts sooner than we had anticipated.</q> (<title>Ad Fam.</title> xii.
15.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="61" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Being refused by all except the Sidonians, he came to a naval engagement with
Dolabella, in which a number of ships were sunk on both sides and Dolabella
captured five with their crews. Then Cassius again sent to those who had
rejected his application, and also to Cleopatra, queen of Egypt, and to
Serapio, her viceroy in Cyprus. The Tyrians, the Aradii, and Serapio,
without consulting Cleopatra, sent Cassius what ships they had. The queen
excused herself on the ground that Egypt was at that time suffering from
famine and pestilence, but she was really cooperating with Dolabella on
account of her relations with the elder Caesar. This was the reason
why she had sent him the four legions by Allienus, and had another fleet
ready to assist him, which was kept back by adverse winds. The Rhodians and
the Lycians said that they would help neither Cassius nor Brutus in civil
wars, and that when they supplied ships to Dolabella they furnished them as
an escort, not knowing that they were to be used as allies in war. </p>
</div><div n="62" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Cassius was again ready with the forces in hand he engaged Dolabella a
second time. The first battle was doubtful, but in the next one Dolabella
was beaten on the sea. Then Cassius completed his mound and battered
Dolabella’s walls till they trembled. He tried unsuccessfully to corrupt
Marsus, the captain of the night-watch, but he bribed the centurions of the
day force and, while Marsus was taking his rest, effected an entrance by
daylight through a number of small gates that were secretly opened to him
one after another. When the city was taken Dolabella offered his head to his
own body-guard and told him to cut it off and carry it to Cassius in order
to secure his own safety. The guard cut it off, but he killed himself also,
and Marsus took his own life. Cassius swore Dolabella’s army into his own
service. He plundered the temples and the treasury of Laodicea, punished the
chief citizens, and exacted very heavy contributions from the rest, so that
the city was reduced to the extremest misery. </p>
</div><div n="63" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After the capture of Laodicea Cassius turned his attention to Egypt. Having
learned that Cleopatra was about to join Octavius and Antony with a strong
fleet, he purposed to prevent its sailing and to punish the queen for her
intention. He had before this thought that the condition of Egypt was
especially favorable for these designs, because it was wasted by famine and
had no considerable foreign army, now that the forces of Allienus had taken
their departure. In the midst of his eagerness, his hopes, and his
opportunity came a hasty summons from Brutus telling him that Octavius and
Antony were crossing the Adriatic. Cassius reluctantly gave up his hopes in
respect of Egypt. He also sent back his Parthian mounted bowmen with
presents, and with them ambassadors to their king asking for a larger force
of auxiliaries. This force arrived after the decisive battle, ravaged Syria
and many of the neighboring provinces as far as Ionia, and then returned
home. Cassius left his nephew in Syria with one legion and sent his cavalry
in advance into Cappadocia, who presently killed Ariobarzanes for plotting
against Cassius. Then they seized his large treasures and other military
supplies and brought them to Cassius. </p>
</div><div n="64" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The people of Tarsus were divided into factions. One of these factions had
crowned Cassius, who was the first to arrive. The other had done the same
for Dolabella, who came later. Both had acted thus in the name of the city.
As the inhabitants bestowed their honors upon each alternately, each of them
treated it despitefully as a fickleminded place. After Cassius had overcome
Dolabella he levied a contribution on it of 1500
talents. Being unable to find the money, and being pressed for payment with
violence by the soldiers, the people sold all their public property and
after that they coined all the sacred articles used in religious processions
and the temple offerings into money. As this was not sufficient, the
magistrates sold free persons into bondage, first girls and boys, afterward
women and miserable old men, who brought a very small price, and finally
young men. Most of these committed suicide. Finally Cassius, on his return
from Syria, took pity on their sufferings and released them from the
remainder of the contribution. Such were the calamities that befell Tarsus
and Laodicea.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER IX</head>
<head>Cassius summons Rhodes to surrender — The Rhodians resolve to fight —
They send Archelaus as an Ambassador to Cassius — Speech of Archelaus
— Reply of Cassius — Sea-fight between Cassius and the Rhodians — The
Rhodians retreat — Cassius lays Siege to the City — Rhodes captured
and put under Contribution — Ten Years’ Tribute exacted from Asia</head>
<div n="65" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Brutus and Cassius had their conference,<note resp="translator">The Epitome of Livy (cxxii.) says that this conference took
place at Smyrna. This is confirmed by Plutarch (<title>Life of
Brutus,</title> 28).</note> Brutus was in favor of uniting their
armies and making Macedonia their chief concern, since the enemy had forty
legions, of which eight had already crossed the Adriatic. Cassius was of the
opinion that the enemy might still be disregarded, believing that they would
waste away for want of supplies by reason of their great numbers. He thought
it would be best to subvert the Rhodians and Lycians, who were friendly to
Octavius and Antony and who had fleets, lest they should fall upon the rear
of the republicans while the latter were busy with the enemy. Having decided
to do this, they separated, Brutus proceeding against the Lycians and
Cassius against Rhodes, in which place he was brought up, and educated in
the literature of Greece. As he had to contend with men of superior naval
prowess, he prepared his own ships with care, filled them with troops, and
drilled them at Myndus. </p>
</div><div n="66" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The Rhodians of distinction were alarmed at the prospect of a conflict with
Romans, but the common people were in high spirits, because they recalled
former victories achieved over men of different character. They launched
thirty-three of their best ships, but while doing so they sent messengers to
Myndus nevertheless to urge Cassius not to despise Rhodes, which had always
defended herself against those who underestimated her, and not to disregard
the treaty which existed between the Rhodians and the Romans which bound
them not to bear arms against each other. If he complained of them for not
rendering military assistance, they would be glad to hear from the Roman
Senate, and if called upon they would lend such assistance. When they had
spoken thus Cassius replied that as to the other matters<note resp="translator">As to whether he underestimated the power of
Rhodes to defend herself.</note> war would decide instead of words, but
as regarded the treaty, which forbade them to bear arms against each other,
the Rhodians had violated it by allying themselves with Dolabella against
Cassius. The treaty required them to assist each other in war, but when
Cassius asked for assistance they quibbled about the Roman Senate, which was
either in flight or held captive at present by the tyrants who had mastered
the city. Those tyrants would be punished, and the Rhodians would be
punished also for siding with them, unless they speedily obeyed his
commands. Such was the answer Cassius returned to them. The more prudent
Rhodians were still more alarmed, but the multitude were excited by two
public speakers named Alexander and Mnaseas, who reminded them that
Mithridates had invaded Rhodes with a still larger fleet,<note resp="translator">See Mithr. 25-27.</note> and that
Demetrius had done so before him; whereupon they elected Alexander as
prytanis, who is the magistrate exercising the supreme power among them, and
Mnaseas as admiral of their fleet. </p>
</div><div n="67" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Nevertheless, they sent still another ambassador to Cassius in the person of
Archelaus, who had been his teacher in Greek literature in Rhodes, to
present a more earnest petition. This he did, taking Cassius by the right
hand in a familiar manner, and saying, <q rend="double">O friend of the Greeks, do not
subvert a Greek city. O friend of freedom, do not attack Rhodes. Do not put
to shame the glory of a Doric state hitherto unvanquished. Do not forget the
famous histories you learned both at Rhodes and at Rome — at Rhodes, what
the Rhodians accomplished against states and kings (and especially against
Demetrius and Mithridates, who were deemed invincible), in behalf of that
freedom for which you say that you also are now contending — at Rome, our
services to you, among others those that were rendered when we fought with
you against Antiochus the Great, concerning which you have monuments
inscribed in our honor. So much, O Roman, for our race, our dignity, our
condition hitherto unenslaved, our alliance, and our good-will toward you.</q> </p>
</div><div n="68" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">As for you, Cassius, you owe a peculiar reverence to this city in which you
were brought up and educated, restored to health when sick, where you had
your hearthstone, and where you attended my very school. You owe respect to
me who have hoped that I should some time plume myself on your education
with different hopes, but I am now pleading this relation in behalf of my
country, lest it be forced into a war with you, its pupil and its ward,
where one of two things must necessarily happen: either that the Rhodians
perish utterly, or Cassius be defeated. In addition to my entreaty I give
you the advice that while engaged in such important tasks in behalf of the
Roman commonwealth you take the gods for your leaders at every step. You,
Romans, swore by the gods when you recently concluded the treaty with us
through Gaius Caesar, and to the oaths you added libations and gave
the right hand, which is valid even among enemies, not to mention friends
and wards. Besides dreading the judgment of the gods, have regard for the
opinions of mankind, who consider nothing more base than a violation of
treaties, which causes the violators to be distrusted in all respects by
both friends and enemies.</q> </p>
</div><div n="69" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the old man had thus spoken he did not let go Cassius’ hand, but shed
tears on it, so that Cassius blushed at the spectacle and was moved somewhat
by the sense of shame, yet he drew away his hand, and said, <q rend="double">If you have not
counselled the Rhodians not to wrong me, you have yourself done me wrong. If
you have so counselled them and they have not followed your advice I will
avenge you. That I have suffered injury is plain enough. The first wrong
done me was when I asked assistance and was slighted by my guardians and
instructors. In the next place they gave the preference to Dolabella, whom
they had not brought up and educated, rather than to me. And what makes it
worse, O freedom-loving Rhodians, is that Brutus and I and the noblest men
of the Senate, whom you see here, were fugitives from tyranny for
endeavoring to liberate their country, while Dolabella was seeking to
enslave it to others, whom you also favor while pretending to abstain from
our civil wars. This would be a civil war if we also were aiming at supreme
power, but it is plainly a war of the republic against monarchy. And you,
who appeal to me in behalf of your own freedom, have refused aid to the
republic. While professing friendship for the Romans you have no pity for
those who have been sentenced to death and confiscation without trial. You
pretend that you want to hear from the Senate, which is suffering from these
very evils and is not yet able to defend itself. But the Senate had answered
you beforehand when it decreed that all the peoples of the Orient should
lend aid to Brutus and myself.</q> </p>
</div><div n="70" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">Whatever aid you have rendered us when we were adding to our possessions
(for which you reaped an abundant reward) you remind us of, but when in our
time of adversity you fail us in the struggle for freedom and safety, you
have very short memories. Even if we had had no relations with each other
before, you ought, as members of the Doric race, to be willing to begin now
to fight for the Roman republic. Instead of such thoughts and deeds you
quote to us treaties, — treaties made with you by Gaius Caesar,
the founder of the present monarchy, — yet these very treaties say that the
Romans and the Rhodians shall assist each other in case of need. Therefore,
assist the Romans in the time of their greatest peril! It is Cassius who
quotes these very treaties to you and calls for your help in war, —
Cassius, a Roman citizen and a Roman general, whom, as the Senate’s decree
says, all the countries beyond the Adriatic are required to obey. The same
decrees are presented to you by Brutus, and also by Pompeius, who has been
invested by the Senate with the command of the sea. Added to these decrees
are the prayers of all these senators who have fled, some to myself and
Brutus, and others to Pompeius. The treaty provides that the Rhodians shall
lend aid to the Romans even in cases where the application is made by single
individuals. If you do not consider us as generals or even as Romans, but as
exiles, or strangers, or persons condemned, as the proscribers call us, O
Rhodians, you have no treaties with us, but only with the Roman people.
Being strangers and foreigners to the treaties, we will fight you till you
obey our orders in everything.</q> With this ironical remark Cassius sent
Archelaus away. </p>
</div><div n="71" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Alexander and Mnaseas, the Rhodian leaders, put to sea with their
thirty-three ships against Cassius at Myndus, intending to surprise him by
the suddenness of their attack. They built their hopes somewhat lightly on
the supposition that by sailing against Mithridates at Myndus they had
brought that war to a successful end. In order to display their seamanship
they took their station the first day at Cnidus. The next day they showed
themselves to the forces of Cassius on the high sea. The latter in
astonishment put to sea against them, and it was a battle of strength and
skill on both sides. The Rhodians with their light ships darted swiftly
through the enemy’s line, turned around, and attacked them in the rear. The
Romans had heavier ships, and whenever they could come to close quarters
they prevailed, as in an engagement on land, by their greater strength.
Cassius, by reason of his more numerous fleet, was enabled to surround his
enemy, and then the latter could no longer turn and dart through his line.
When they could only attack in front and then haul off, their nautical skill
was of no avail in the narrow space where they were confined. The ramming
with their prows and broadside movements against the heavier Roman ships did
little damage, while those of the Romans against the lighter vessels were
more effective. Finally, three Rhodian ships were captured with their crews,
two were rammed and sunk, and the remainder took flight to Rhodes in a
damaged condition. All of the Roman ships returned to Myndus, where they
were repaired, the greater part having suffered injury. </p>
</div><div n="72" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Such was the result of the naval engagement of the Romans and the Rhodians at
Myndus. Cassius watched the fight while it was going on from the summit of a
mountain. When he had repaired his ships he sailed to Loryma, a fortified
place belonging to the Rhodians on the mainland opposite the island, from
which he sent his foot-soldiers across in transports under the command of
Fannius and Lentulus.<note resp="translator">This was
the Lentulus whose letter to the Senate is mentioned in the note on p.
332.</note> He advanced in person with eighty ships rigged in a way to
produce terror. He surrounded Rhodes with his land and naval forces, and
then remained quiet, expecting that the enemy would show signs of weakening.
But they sailed out again valiantly and, after losing two more ships, were
hemmed in on all sides. Then they mounted the walls, heaped them with
missiles, and resisted simultaneously the soldiers of Fannius, who were
assailing them on the landward side, and Cassius, who was advancing his
naval force, prepared for wall-fighting, against the defences on the sea.
Anticipating such a necessity he had brought with him turrets in sections,
which were then elevated. Thus was Rhodes, after suffering two naval
defeats, beleaguered by land and sea, and, as frequently happens in sudden
and unexpected trouble, found herself wholly unprepared for siege; whence it
became evident that the city must speedily be taken either by assault or by
famine. The more intelligent of the Rhodians perceived this and opened
communications with Fannius and Lentulus. </p>
</div><div n="73" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While they were doing so Cassius suddenly made his appearance in the midst of
the city with a chosen band of soldiers, without any show of violence or use
of ladders. Most people conjectured, as seemed the fact, that those of the
citizens who were favorable to him had opened the small gates, being moved
by pity for the town and the apprehension of famine. Thus was Rhodes
captured; and Cassius took his seat on the tribunal and planted a spear by
the side of it to indicate that he had taken the city by force. Laying
strict commands upon his soldiers to remain quiet, and threatening with
death any who should resort to violence or plunder, he summoned by name
about fifty citizens, and punished with death those who were led before him.
The others, who were not found, numbering about twenty-five, he ordered to
be banished. All the money that was found, either gold or silver, in the
temples and the public treasury, he seized, and he ordered private citizens
who had any to bring it to him on a day named, proclaiming death to those
who should conceal it, together with a reward of one-tenth to informers and
freedom in addition in the case of slaves. At first many concealed what they
had, hoping that in the end the threat would not be carried out, but when
they saw the rewards paid and those who had been informed against punished,
they became alarmed, and having procured the appointment of another day,
some of them dug their money out of the ground, others drew it out of wells,
and others brought it from tombs, in much larger amounts than the former
collections.<note resp="translator">Dion Cassius
(xlvii. 33) says that Cassius did the Rhodians no harm, but that he took
their valuables, both sacred and profane, <q rend="double">except the chariot of the
Sun.</q> Plutarch says that he did not treat them with moderation, <foreign xml:lang="grc">οὐκ ἐπιεικῶς ἐχρῆτο τοῖς πράγμασι,</foreign> a
phrase which does not necessarily imply the shedding of blood.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="74" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Such were the calamities that befell the Rhodians. Lucius Varus was left in
charge of them with a garrison. Cassius, although delighted with the
quickness of the capture and the quantity of money taken, nevertheless
ordered all the other peoples of Asia to pay ten years’ tribute, and this
they did within a short space of time. News now reached him that Cleopatra
was about to sail with a large fleet and very extensive apparatus to
Octavius and Antony. She had espoused their cause previously on account of
her relations with the first Caesar, and now she espoused it all
the more by reason of her fear of Cassius. The latter sent Murcus, with a
legion of the best soldiers and a certain number of archers, with sixty
decked ships, to the Peloponnesus, to lie in wait in the neighborhood of
Taenarum and to collect what booty they could from that country.
</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER X</head>
<head>Brutus in Macedonia — He marches against Xanthus — Desperate Defence of
the Place — Capture of Xanthus — The Xanthians destroy the City and
Themselves — Capture of Patara — Murcus sails to Brundusium to
blockade Antony</head>

<div n="75" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>We will now relate the transactions of Brutus in Lycia, first glancing at
what has been mentioned above in order to refresh the memory.<note resp="translator">See iii. 63
<emph>supra.</emph></note> When he had received from Apuleius
certain soldiers which the latter had under his command, together with
16,000 talents in money which Apuleius had collected from the tribute of
Asia, he passed into Bœotia. The Senate having voted that he
should use this money for his present necessities and that he should have
command of Macedonia, and of Illyria in addition, he came into possession of
three legions of soldiers which Vatinius, the former governor of Illyria,
delivered to him. Another one he captured from Gaius, the brother of Mark
Antony, in Macedonia. He collected four more in addition to these, so that
he had eight legions in all, most of whom had served under Gaius
Caesar. He had a large force of cavalry, light-armed troops, and
archers. He had a high opinion of his Macedonian soldiers and he trained
them in the Roman discipline. While he was still collecting soldiers and
money a piece of good luck came to him from Thrace, of the following sort.
Polemocratia, the wife of one of the Thracian princes, whose husband had
been killed by his enemies, being alarmed for her son, who was still a boy,
came to Brutus bringing the boy, whom she placed in his hands together with
her husband’s treasures. Brutus delivered the boy to the inhabitants of
Cyzicus to be cared for until he (Brutus) should have leisure to restore him
to his kingdom. Among the treasures he found an unexpected quantity of gold
and silver. This he stamped and converted into money. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 712</note>
</p>
</div><div n="76" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Cassius came, and it was decided to begin by reducing the Lycians and
Rhodians, Brutus turned his attention first to the inhabitants of Xanthus in
Lycia. The latter destroyed their suburbs in order that Brutus might <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0042">42</date></note> not effect a lodgment or find material there. They
also surrounded the city with a trench and embankment of more than fifty
feet vertically and of corresponding breadth, from which they fought, so
that standing upon it they could hurl darts and shoot arrows as though
protected by an impassable river. Brutus invested the place, pushed forward
coverings for his workmen, divided his army into day and night forces,
brought up material from long distances, hurrying and cheering as in
contests for prizes, and spared neither zeal nor labor. So the work which it
seemed most likely could not be done at all in the face of an opposing
enemy, or only at the end of many months, was accomplished by him in a few
days. </p>
</div><div n="77" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The Xanthians were now subjected to close siege. Brutus attacked them now
with battering-rams against the walls, now by assaults upon the gates with
foot-soldiers, whom he kept changing continually. The defenders, although
fatigued by being always pitted against fresh soldiers, and all wounded,
nevertheless held out as long as their parapets remained. When these were
battered down and the towers broken through, Brutus, foreseeing what would
happen, ordered those who were attacking the gates to withdraw. The
Xanthians, thinking that the enemy’s works were deserted and unguarded,
darted out by night to set fire to the machines. Suddenly the Romans
attacked them as ordered, and they again fled to the gates, the guards of
which closed them before they entered, fearing lest the enemy should rush in
with them — in consequence of which there was around the gates a great
slaughter of the Xanthians who were shut out. </p>
</div><div n="78" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Soon afterwards the remainder made a fresh sally about midday, and as the
besiegers withdrew again, they burned all the machines. As the gates were
left open for them on account of the former calamity, about 2000 Romans
broke in with them. While others were pushing in at the entrance the
portcullis suddenly fell upon them, either by the design of the Xanthians or
the accidental breaking of the ropes, so that some of the Romans who were
forcing their way in were crushed and the others found their retreat cut
off, as they could not raise the portcullis without the hoisting apparatus.
Pelted by missiles hurled upon them by the Xanthians from the roofs in the
narrow streets, they forced their way with difficulty till they came to the
forum, which was near by, and there they overcame the forces which were at
close quarters with them, but, being under a heavy volley of arrows and
having themselves neither bows nor javelins, they took refuge in the temple
of Sarpedon to avoid being surrounded. The Romans who were outside the walls
were excited and anxious for those inside, and tried every means [to effect
an entrance], Brutus meantime darting hither and thither, but they were not
able to break the portcullis, which was protected with iron, nor could they
procure ladders or towers since their own had been burned. Nevertheless some
of them made extemporized ladders, and others pushed trunks of trees against
the walls to serve in place of ladders. Still others fastened iron hooks to
ropes and hurled them up to the walls, and whenever one of them caught fast
they climbed up. </p>
</div><div n="79" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The Œnandians, who were neighbors of the Xanthians, and who had
formed an alliance with Brutus by reason of their enmity to the latter,
clambered up by way of a precipice. When the Romans saw them they toiled up
after them. Many fell off, but some scaled the wall and opened a small gate,
defended with a very dense palisade, and admitted the most daring of the
assailants, who swung themselves over the palings. Being now more numerous
they began to chop down the portcullis, which was not protected with iron on
the inside, while others outside chopped in conjunction with them, and
coöperated to the same end. While the Xanthians, with loud cries,
were rushing upon the Romans who were at the temple of Sarpedon, the Romans
within and without who were demolishing the portcullis, fearful for their
comrades, struggled with frantic zeal. Finally they broke it down and rushed
through in crowds about sunset, with a loud shout intended as a signal to
those in the temple. </p>
</div><div n="80" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the city was taken the Xanthians ran to their houses and killed those
dearest to them, all of whom willingly offered themselves to the slaughter.
Upon hearing cries of lamentation, Brutus thought that plundering was going
on, and he gave orders to the army to stop it; but when he knew what the
facts were he commiserated the freedom-loving spirit of the citizens, and
sent messengers to offer them terms. They hurled missiles at the messengers,
and, after destroying their own families, placed the bodies on funeral
piles, which they had previously erected in their houses, set fire to them,
and slew themselves on the same. Brutus saved such of the temples as he
could, but he captured only the slaves of the Xanthians; and of the citizens
a few free women and hardly 150 men. Thus the Xanthians perished the third
time by their own hands on account of their love of liberty; for when the
city was besieged by Harpagus, the Mede, the general of Cyrus the Great,
they destroyed themselves in like manner rather than be enslaved, and the
city, shut up by Harpagus,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἡ πόλις ἀμεληθεῖσα ὑπὸ Ἁρπάγου</foreign>: literally, <q rend="double">the city being uncared for by
Harpagus.</q> What this may mean it is hard to understand, since Harpagus
was an enemy outside the walls. Mendelssohn accordingly suggests
<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀποκλεισθεῖσα</foreign> (shut up) in place
of <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀμεληθεῖσα.</foreign> I have adopted this
emendation, but it is pure conjecture.</note> then became the tomb of
the Xanthians; and it is said that they suffered a similar fate at the hands
of Alexander, the son of Philip, as they would not submit to obey him even
after he had become the master of so large a portion of the earth.<note resp="translator">Plutarch’s account of the siege
and destruction of Xanthus is very like Appian’s. He refers also to its
earlier destruction in the Persian war (<title>Life of Brutus,</title>
30, 31). The latter event is described by Herodotus (i. 176).</note>
</p>
</div><div n="81" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Brutus went from Xanthus down to Patara, a city which was something like a
seaport of the Xanthians. He surrounded it with his army and ordered the
inhabitants to obey him in everything, under penalty of meeting the fate of
the Xanthians. Certain Xanthians were brought to them who lamented their own
misfortunes and advised them to adopt wiser counsels. As the inhabitants of
Patara made no sort of answer to the Xanthians, Brutus gave them the
remainder of the day to consider the matter, and went away. The next morning
he moved his troops forward. The Patarans cried out from the walls that they
would obey all his commands, and opened their gates. He came in, but he
neither killed nor banished anybody; but he ordered them to deliver to him
whatever gold and silver the city possessed, and each citizen to bring in
his private holdings under the same penalties and rewards to informers as
those proclaimed by Cassius at Rhodes. They obeyed his order. One slave
testified that his master had concealed his gold, and showed it to a
centurion who was sent to find it. All the parties were brought before the
tribunal. The master remained silent, but his mother, who had followed in
order to save her son, cried out that she had concealed the gold. The slave,
although not interrogated, disputed her, saying that she lied and that his
master had concealed it. Brutus approved of the young man’s silence and
sympathized with his mother’s grief. He allowed them both to depart unharmed
and to take their gold with them, and he crucified the slave for
superserviceable zeal in accusing his superiors. </p>
</div><div n="82" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>At the same time Lentulus, who had been sent to Andriace, the seaport of the
Myreans, broke the chain which closed the harbor and ascended to Myra. As
the inhabitants obeyed his commands, he collected money in the same way as
at Patara and returned to Brutus. The confederation of Lycia sent
ambassadors to Brutus promising to form a military league with him and to
contribute what money they could. He imposed taxes on them and he restored
the free Xanthians to their city. He ordered the Lycian fleet, together with
his own ships, to set sail for Abydus, where he would rendezvous with his
land forces and await Cassius, who was coming from Ionia, so that they might
cross over to Sestus together. When Murcus, who was at Peloponnesus lying in
wait for Cleopatra, learned that her fleet had been damaged by a storm on
the Libyan coast, and saw the wreckage borne by the waves as far as Laconia,
and knew that she had returned home with difficulty and in ill health, he
sailed for Brundusium in order that he might not be idle with so great a
fleet. He came to anchor at the island lying opposite the harbor, and
prevented the remainder of the enemy’s army and supplies from passing over
to Macedonia. Antony fought him with the few war-ships that he had, and with
towers mounted on floats, whenever he sent out detachments of his army on
transports and was favored by a strong wind from the land, in order that
they might not be captured by Murcus. As he fared badly he called for help
from Octavius, who was contending on the water with Sextus Pompeius along
the coast of Sicily for possession of that island.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="11" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XI</head>
<head>Doings of Sextus Pompeius in Spain — He sails to Sicily — Sea-fight
between Pompeius and Salvidienus — Salvidienus put to Flight —
Octavius and Antony cross the Adriatic — Their Advance Guard march to
Philippi and occupy the Passes of the Mountains of Thrace — Brutus and
Cassius move toward Philippi</head>
<div n="83" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>With Pompeius the situation was as follows. Being the younger son of Pompey
the Great, he was at first disregarded by Gaius Caesar in Spain as
not likely to accomplish anything of importance on account of his youth and
inexperience. He roamed about the ocean with a few followers, committing
piracy and concealing the fact that he was Pompeius. When larger numbers
joined him for the purpose of pillage, and his force became powerful, he
revealed his name. Presently those who had served with his father and his
brother, and who were leading a vagabond life, drifted to him as their
natural leader, and Arabio, who had been deprived of his ancestral kingdom,
as I have related previously, came to him from Africa.<note resp="translator">See Sec. 54.</note> His forces being thus
augmented, his doings were now more important than robbery, and as he flew
from place to place the name of Pompeius spread through the whole of
Spain,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">καὶ ὄνομα τοῦ Πομπηίου . . . περίθεοντός τε καὶ
μεθιπταμένου.</foreign> Mendelssohn suggests, in place of the
second clause, <foreign xml:lang="grc">περιέθει ἐπιόντος
τε.</foreign></note> which was the most extensive of the provinces; but
he avoided coming to an engagement with the governors of it appointed by
Gaius Caesar. When Caesar learned of his doings he sent
Carinas with a stronger army to fight him. Pompeius, however, being the more
nimble of the two, would show himself and then disappear, and so he wore out
his enemy and got possession of a number of towns, large and small. </p>
</div><div n="84" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Then Caesar sent Asinius Pollio as successor to Carinas to prosecute
the war against Pompeius. While they were carrying on the same kind of
warfare, Caesar was assassinated and the Senate recalled Pompeius.
The latter came to Massilia and there watched the course of events at Rome.
Having been appointed commander of the sea with the same powers that his
father had exercised, he did not yet come back to the city, but, taking what
ships he found in the harbors, and joining them with those he had brought
from Spain, he put to sea. When the triumvirate was established he sailed to
Sicily, and as Bithynicus, the governor, would not yield the island, he
besieged him, until Hirtius and Fannius, two men who had been proscribed and
had fled from Rome, persuaded Bithynicus to surrender Sicily to Pompeius. </p>
</div><div n="85" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In this way Pompeius possessed himself of Sicily, and thus had ships, and an
island lying convenient to Italy, and an army, now of considerable size,
composed of those whom he had before, and those who had fled from Rome, both
freemen and slaves, or those sent to him by the Italian cities which had
been proclaimed as prizes of victory for the soldiers. These cities dreaded
a victory of the triumvirs more than anything else, and whatever they could
do against them secretly they did. The wealthy citizens fled from a country
that they could no longer consider their own and took refuge with Pompeius,
who was near by and greatly beloved by all at that time. There were present
with him also many seafaring men from Africa and Spain, skilled in naval
affairs, so that Pompeius was well provided with officers, ships, troops,
and money. When Octavius learned these facts he sent Salvidienus with a
fleet to come alongside of Pompeius and destroy him, as though it were an
easy task, while he passed through Italy himself with the intention of
joining Salvidienus at Rhegium. Pompeius advanced with a large fleet to meet
Salvidienus, and a naval engagement took place between them at the entrance
of the straits near the promontory of Scyllaeum. The ships of
Pompeius, being lighter and manned by better sailors, excelled in swiftness
and skill, while those of the Romans, being of great tonnage and size,
labored heavily. When the usual rush of waves through the straits came on,
and the sea dashed hither and thither under the influence of the current,
the ships of Pompeius suffered less than their adversaries, because they
were accustomed to the agitation of the waters; while those of Salvidienus,
being unable to maintain their position firmly, or to work their oars, or
manage their rudders, by reason of their inexperience, were thrown into
confusion. Accordingly, about sunset, Salvidienus was the first to give the
signal of retreat. Pompeius withdrew also. The ships suffered about equally
on both sides. Salvidienus retired to the port of Balarus, facing the
straits, where he repaired what was left of his damaged and wasted fleet. </p>
</div><div n="86" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Octavius arrived he gave a solemn promise to the inhabitants of Rhegium
and Vibo that they should be exempt from the list of prizes of victory, for
he feared them on account of their nearness to the straits. As Antony had
sent him a hasty summons, he set sail to join the latter at Brundusium,
having Sicily and Pompeius on his left hand; and postponing the conquest of
the island for the time being. On the approach of Octavius, Murcus withdrew
a short distance from Brundusium in order that he might not be between
Antony and Octavius, and there he watched for the passage of the transports
that were carrying the army across from Brundusium to Macedonia. The latter
were escorted by triremes, but a strong and favorable wind having sprung up
they darted across fearlessly, needing no escort. Murcus was vexed, but he
lay in wait for the empty ships on their return. Yet these returned, took on
board the remainder of the soldiers, and crossed again with full sails until
the whole army, together with Octavius and Antony, had passed over. Although
Murcus recognized that his plans were frustrated by some fatality, he held
his position nevertheless, in order to hinder as much as possible the
passage of the enemy’s munitions and supplies, or supplementary troops.
Domitius Ahenobarbus<note resp="translator">This was the
son of Caesar’s enemy of the same name who was killed during
the retreat of the Pompeians from the field of Pharsalus. Ahenobarbus is
a Latin surname meaning bronze-beard, the equivalent of Barbarossa. The
codices contain an amusing series of blunders here. One manuscript has
<foreign xml:lang="grc"> Δομίτιος ὁ ἀοινόβαρος</foreign> (Domitius
not heavy with wine), another <foreign xml:lang="grc">Δομίτιος ἀηνοβάρβαρος</foreign> (Domitius, the bronze barbarian), four
others have <foreign xml:lang="grc">Δομίτιος δ’ ἦν ὁ βάρβαρος</foreign> (Domitius was a barbarian).</note> was sent by
Brutus and Cassius to coöperate with him in this work, which they
deemed most useful, together with fifty additional ships, one legion, and a
body of archers; for, as the triumvirs did not have a plentiful supply of
provisions from elsewhere, it was deemed important to cut off their convoys
from Italy. And so Murcus and Domitius, with their 130 long ships and a
still greater number of small ones, and their large military force, sailed
hither and thither harassing the enemy. </p>
</div><div n="87" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Decidius<note resp="translator">The name of this man was
Decidius Saxa. He is mentioned in <title>Syr.</title> 51 and in the
Epitome of Livy, cxxvii.</note> and Norbanus, whom Octavius and Antony
had sent in advance with eight legions to Macedonia, proceeded from that
country a distance of 1500 stades toward the
mountainous part of Thrace until they had passed beyond the city of
Philippi, and seized the passes of the Corpileans and the Sapaeans,
tribes under the rule of Rhascupolis, where lies the only known route of
travel from Asia to Europe. Here was the first obstacle encountered by
Brutus and Cassius after they had crossed over from Abydus to Sestus.
Rhascupolis and Rhascus were brothers of the royal family of Thrace, ruling
one country. They differed in opinion at that time in regard to the proper
alliance. Rhascus had taken up arms for Antony and Rhascupolis for Cassius,
each having 3000 horse. When the Cassians came to inquire about the roads,
Rhascupolis told them that the one by way of Aenus and Maronea was
the short and usual and most travelled route, but that it led to the gorge
of the Sapaeans, which was occupied by the enemy and hence was
impassable, but that there was a roundabout road which was difficult and
three times as long. </p>
</div><div n="88" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Brutus and Cassius, thinking that the enemy had taken that position not so
much to close the passage to them as to transfer themselves from Macedonia
to Thrace for want of provisions, marched toward Aenus and Maronea
from Lysimacheia and Cardia,<note resp="translator">The
text says that they marched toward Aenus and Maronea and thence
toward Lysimacheia and Cardia, which would be the reverse of the route
they actually took to Philippi. Schweighäuser judged that this
was a copyist’s blunder.</note> which clasp the neck of the Thracian
Chersonesus like gates. The next day brought them to the gulf of Melas.<note resp="translator">Here we have more geographical
confusion. The gulf of Melas, <emph>i.e.,</emph> the Black Gulf,
was a day’s journey east instead of west of Aenus. Cardia was
situated on it. Probably the safest conclusion is that Appian did not
know the exact situation of any of these places except Lysimacheia and
Cardia. These he has placed correctly at the neck of the Thracian
Chersonesus.</note> Here they reviewed their army, <figure>
<head>Coast of Thrace, showing the Field of Philippi</head>
</figure>
</p>
<p>which contained in all nineteen legions of infantry. Of these Brutus had
eight and Cassius nine, not full, but among them were two legions that were
nearly full, so that they mustered about 80,000 foot-soldiers. Brutus had
4000 Gallic and Lusitanian horse, 3000 Thracian and Illyrian,<note resp="translator">The number of Thracian and
Illyrian horse is not given in the text. The number is inferred from the
second enumeration found in Sec. 108 <emph>infra.</emph></note>
and 2000 Parthian and Thessalian. Cassius had 2000 Spanish and Gallic horse
and 4000 mounted bowmen, Arabs, Medes, and Parthians. The allied kings and
tetrarchs of the Galatians in Asia followed him, leading a large additional
force of foot-soldiers and about 5000 horse.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XII</head>
<head>Brutus and Cassius arrive at the Gulf of Melas — Speech of Cassius to
the Republican Army — After which they move against the Enemy</head>
<div n="89" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Such was the size of the army reviewed by Brutus and Cassius at the gulf of
Melas, and with it they advanced to battle, leaving the remainder of their
forces on duty elsewhere. After performing a lustration for the army, they
completed the payment of the promised donative still due to the soldiers.
They had provided themselves with an abundant supply of money in order to
propitiate them with gifts, especially the large number who had served under
Gaius Caesar, lest at the sight or the name of the younger
Caesar, who was advancing, they should change their minds. For
which reason also it was deemed best to address the soldiers publicly. A
large platform was built, upon which the generals took their places,
accompanied by the senators only. The soldiers, both their own and their
allies, stood around it below, filled with joy at the sight of their vast
number, the most powerful they had ever beheld. To both the generals this
was an immediate source of the greatest hope and courage. This more than
anything else confirmed the fidelity of the army to the generals, for common
hopes generate good feeling. There was a great deal of noise, as is usual on
such occasions. The heralds and trumpeters proclaimed silence, and, when
this was obtained, Cassius, who was the elder of the two, advanced a little
in front of his companions and spoke as follows:— </p>
</div><div n="90" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double">A common peril, fellow-soldiers, is the first thing that binds us in a
common fidelity to each other. The second is, that we have given you all
that we have promised, and this is the surest guarantee for what we have
promised you in the future. All our hopes rest in bravery — the bravery of
you, fellow-soldiers, and of us whom you see on this platform, this large
and noble body of senators. We have, as you see, the most abundant munitions
of war, supplies, arms, money, ships, and auxiliaries both from Roman
provinces and the allied kings. Why is it needful, then, to exhort you with
words to zeal and unanimity — you whom a common purpose and common
interests have brought together? As to the slanders that those two men, our
enemies, have brought against us, you understand them perfectly, and it is
for that reason that you were ready to take up arms with us. Yet it seems
fitting to explain our reasons once more. These will prove to you that we
have the most honorable and righteous cause for war.</q> </p>
</div><div n="91" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">We raised Caesar to his high place, serving him in war in
conjunction with you and holding commands under him. We continued his
friends so long that no one could imagine that we conspired against him on
account of any private grudge. It was in time of peace that he sinned, not
against us, his friends (for we were honored before others by him), but
against the laws, against the order of the commonwealth. There was no longer
any law supreme, either aristocratic or plebeian, nor any of the
institutions that our fathers established when they expelled the kings and
swore never to tolerate royal government again. We, descendants of the men
who thus swore, sustained that oath and warded off the curse from ourselves.
We could no longer endure that one man, although he was our friend and
benefactor, should take from the people and vest in himself the control of
the public money, the armies, and the elections, and from the Senate the
appointment of governors of the provinces; that his will should take the
place of the laws, his rule should supplant that of the people, and his
supremacy that of the Senate in everything.</q> </p>
</div><div n="92" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">Perhaps you did not understand these matters particularly, but saw only his
bravery in war. Yet you may easily learn about them now by observing only
the part that concerns yourselves. You, of the common people, when you go to
the wars, obey your generals as masters in everything. But in time of peace
you resume the mastery over us. The Senate deliberates first, in order that
you may not make a slip, but you decide for yourselves; you give your votes
by tribes, or by centuries; you choose the consuls, the tribunes, the
praetors. In the comitia you pass judgment on the weightiest
questions, and you decide rewards and punishments when we have deserved
rewards or punishments at your hands. This balance of powers, O citizens,
has raised the empire to the summit of fortune and conferred honors upon
those worthy of them, and the men thus honored have returned thanks to you.
By virtue of this power you made Scipio consul when you bore testimony to
his deeds in Africa, and you elected whom you pleased each year as tribunes,
to oppose us in your interest if necessary. But why should I repeat so many
things that you already know?</q> </p>
</div><div n="93" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">From the time when Caesar’s domination began you no longer elected
any magistrate, either praetor, or consul, or tribune. Nor did you
bear testimony to anybody’s deeds, nor, if you had done so, could you have
rewarded them. In a word, nobody owed you any thanks either for a magistracy
or a governorship, either for approving his accounts or acquitting him on a
trial. Most lamentable of all, you could not defend your tribunes against
insult, whom you had constituted your own peculiar and perpetual magistracy,
and had made sacred and inviolable. Yet you saw these inviolable men
despoiled with contumely of this inviolable office, and of their sacred
vestments, without trial, at the order of one man, because in your behalf
they saw fit to proceed against certain persons who wished to proclaim him
as king. The senators were deeply grieved at this on your account, for the
office of tribune is yours, not theirs. But they were not able to censure
this man openly or to bring him to trial by reason of the strength of the
armies, which, although heretofore belonging to the republic, he had made
his own. So they adopted the only remaining method to ward off tyranny, and
that was to conspire against the person of the tyrant.</q> </p>
</div><div n="94" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">It was necessary that the decision should be that of the best men, but that
the deed should be done by a few. When it was done the Senate voiced the
general approval clearly by proposing rewards to the tyrannicides. Antony
restrained them from doing so on the pretext that it would lead to disorder;
nor was it our intention to confer this benefit upon Rome for the sake of
reward, but solely for the sake of the country. Accordingly the senators
refrained, not wishing to insult Caesar, but only to get rid of the
tyranny. So they voted amnesty for all, and it was more particularly decreed
that there should be no prosecution for the murder. After a little, when
Antony excited the mob against us, the Senate gave us command of the largest
provinces and armies, and ordered all the countries between Syria and the
Adriatic to obey us. In so doing did they punish us as monsters, or did they
rather distinguish us as tyrannicides with the royal purple and with the
rods and axes? For like reason the Senate recalled from exile the younger
Pompeius (who was not concerned in this conspiracy), because he was the only
son of Pompey the Great, who first took up arms to defend the republic, and
because the young man had made some little opposition in a private way to
the tyranny in Spain. It passed a decree also to pay back to him, out of the
public funds, the value of his father’s property, and it appointed him
admiral in order that he also might hold a command because he was on the
side of the republic. What more could you ask of the Senate by way of deed
or of sign to show that everything was done with their approval, unless that
they should declare it to you in so many words? But they will do and say
this very thing, and saying it they will repay you with magnificent gifts,
when they are able to speak and to requite your services.</q> </p>
</div><div n="95" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">What their present situation is you know. They have been proscribed without
trial, and their property confiscated. Without being condemned, they have
been put to death in their houses, in the streets, in temples, by soldiers,
by slaves, by personal enemies. They have been dragged out of their
hiding-places and pursued everywhere, although the laws allow anybody to go
into voluntary exile. In the forum, where the head of an enemy was never
carried, but only captured arms and the beaks of ships, the heads of those
who were lately consuls, praetors, tribunes, aediles, and
knights have been exhibited. Rewards have been assigned for these horrors.
This is a breaking out of all the wounds that had been previously healed
over, — sudden seizures of men, and all kinds of infamy perpetrated by
wives and sons, freedmen and slaves. Into so desperate a plight and such
conditions has the city now been plunged. At the head of all these villains
are the triumvirs, who proscribe their own brothers and uncles and tutors
first of all. It is said that the city was once captured by the most savage
barbarians, but the Gauls never cut off any heads, they never insulted the
dead, they never begrudged their enemies a chance to hide or fly. Nor did we
ever treat in this way any city that we had captured in war, nor did we ever
hear of others doing so. Moreover, it is no ordinary city, but the mistress
of the world, that is thus wronged by those who have been chosen to set in
order and regulate the republic. What did Tarquin ever do like this, —
Tarquin, whom our ancestors hurled from the throne for an outrage committed
upon one woman under the influence of the amatory passion, and then, for
that one act, they resolved to be ruled by kings no longer?</q> </p>
</div><div n="96" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">While the triumvirs are committing these outrages, O citizens, they call us
infamous wretches. They say they are avenging Caesar when they
proscribe men who were not in Rome when he was killed. Very many of these
are here, as you see, who have been proscribed on account of their wealth,
their family, or their preferences for republican government. For this
reason Pompeius was proscribed with us, although he was far away in Spain
when we did the deed. Because he was the son of a republican father (for
which reason also he was recalled by the Senate and made commander of the
sea), he was proscribed by the triumvirs. What part have those women had in
the conspiracy against Caesar, who have been condemned to pay
tribute? What part have those plebeians had, whose property is worth 100,000
drachmas each, upon whom new taxes and contributions have been imposed,
which they have been ordered to pay under penalty of being informed against
and fined? And even while levying these exactions the triumvirs have not
fully paid the sums promised to their troops, while we, who have done
nothing contrary to justice, have given you all that we promised and have
other funds ready for still larger rewards. So it comes about that the gods
favor us because we do what is just.</q> </p>
</div><div n="97" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">Besides the favor of the gods you can see that we have that of mankind by
looking at these, your fellow-citizens, whom you have often beheld as your
generals and your consuls, and who have won your praises as such. You see
that they have had recourse to us as to men doing right and defending the
republic. They espouse our cause, they offer up their prayers, and they
coöperate with us for what still remains to be done. Far more just
are the rewards we have offered to those who rescue them than those which
the triumvirs offer for killing them. The triumvirs know that we, who killed
Caesar because he assumed the monarchy, would not tolerate them in
assuming his power and that we would not assume it ourselves, but that we
would restore to the people in common the government as we received it from
our ancestors. So you see the two sides have not taken up arms for the same
reason, — the enemy aiming at monarchy and despotism, as their proscription
already proves, while we seek nothing but the mere privilege of living as
private citizens under the laws of our country made once more free.
Naturally the men before you espouse our side as the gods had done
previously. In war the greatest hope lies in the justice of one’s cause.</q> </p>
</div><div n="98" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">Let it give no one any concern that he has been one of Caesar’s
soldiers. We were not <emph>his</emph> soldiers then, but our
country’s. The pay and the rewards given were not Caesar’s, but the
republic’s. For the same reason you are not now the soldiers of Cassius, or
of Brutus, but of Rome. We, Roman generals, are your fellow-soldiers. If our
enemies were of the same spirit with ourselves it would be possible for all
to lay down their arms without danger, and give back all the armies to the
commonwealth, and let it choose its own destiny. If they will accept such
terms, we challenge them to do so. Since they will not (for they could not,
on account of the proscription and the other things they have done), let us
go forward, fellow-soldiers, with unwavering confidence and honest zeal,
fighting only for the freedom of the Senate and people of Rome.</q> </p>
</div><div n="99" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>They all cried out, <q rend="double">Let us go forward!</q> and urged him to lead them on
immediately. Cassius was delighted with their spirit, and again proclaimed
silence and again addressed them, saying: <q rend="double">May the gods who preside over
just wars and over good faith reward your zeal, fellow-soldiers. How far
superior we are to the enemy in everything that the human foresight of
generals can provide let me tell you. We are equal to them in the number of
legions, although we have left behind us the large detachments needed in
many places. In cavalry and ships we greatly surpass them, as also in
auxiliaries from kings and nations as far as the Medes and Parthians.
Besides this we have to deal only with an enemy in front, while Pompeius is
cooperating with us in Sicily in their rear, and in the Adriatic Murcus and
Ahenobarbus with a large fleet and abundance of small craft, besides two
legions of soldiers and a body of archers, are cruising hither and thither
harassing them in various ways, while both land and sea in our rear are
cleared of enemies. As regards money, which some call the sinews of
war,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">νεῦρα πολέμου</foreign>: <q rend="double">sinews of war.</q> This phrase is older
than Appian. It occurs in Cicero’s <title>Philippic,</title> v. 2,
 <q rend="double"><foreign xml:lang="lat">nervos belli, pecuniam infinitam.</foreign></q></note> they
are destitute. They cannot pay what they have promised their army. The
proceeds of the proscription have not met their expectation, because no good
man will buy lands entailed with hate. Nor can they obtain resources
elsewhere from Italy, exhausted as it is by civil strife, exactions, and
proscriptions. Thanks to abundant foresight, we have plenty for the present,
so that we can give you more shortly, and there are other large sums on the
road collected from the nations behind us. </q></p>
</div><div n="100" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">Provisions, the supply of which is the chief difficulty in large armies,
they can obtain only from Macedonia, a mountainous region, and the narrow
country of Thessaly, and this must be carried to them overland with severe
labor. If they try to obtain any from Africa, or Lucania, or Apulia,
Pompeius, Murcus, and Domitius will cut them off entirely. We have
abundance, and it is brought to us daily by sea without labor from all the
islands and mainlands which lie between Thrace and the river Euphrates, and
without hindrance, since we have no enemy in our rear. So it rests with us
either to hasten the battle, or by delaying it to waste the enemy by hunger.
Such and so great, fellow-soldiers, are our preparations, so far as they
depend on human foresight. May the future event correspond to these
preparations by your efforts and by the help of the gods. As we have paid
you all that we promised for your former exploits and have rewarded your
fidelity with abundant gifts, so for this greater battle we will, under the
favor of the gods, provide you a reward worthy of it. And now, to increase
the zeal with which you already advance to your task, and in remembrance of
this assembly and of these words, we will make an additional gift from this
platform — to each soldier 1500 Italic
drachmas,<note resp="translator">This is the only
place in Appian where we find the phrase <q rend="double">Italic drachmas.</q> What is
meant is the Roman denarius, equal to sixteen American cents.</note> to
each centurion five times that sum, and to each tribune in proportion.</q> </p>
</div><div n="101" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Having thus spoken and having put his army in good spirits by deed and word
and gifts, he dissolved the assembly. The soldiers remained a long time
heaping praises on Cassius and Brutus and promising to do their duty. The
generals immediately counted out the money to them, and to the bravest
awarded an additional sum on various pretexts. As they received their pay
they were dismissed by detachments on the march to Doriscus, and the
generals themselves followed soon afterward. Two eagles alighted upon the
two silver eagles which surmounted the standards, pecking at them, or, as
others say, protecting them, and there they remained, being fed by the
generals from the public stores until the day before the battle, when they
flew away. After marching two days around the gulf of Melas the army came to
Aenus and thence to Doriscus and other towns on the coast as far as
Mount Serrium.<note resp="translator">Both Doriscus and
Mount Serrium are mentioned in Pliny’s <title>Natural History</title>
(iv. 18).</note>
</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="13" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XIII</head>
<head>Tillius Cimber flanks the Enemy with his Fleet — Brutus and Cassius
impeded by the Mountains — Severe Labors in the Thracian Forests —
They arrive at Philippi — They encamp on the Hills</head>

<div n="102" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As Mount Serrium projected into the sea Cassius and Brutus turned to the
mainland, but they sent Tillius Cimber with the fleet and one legion of
troops and some archers to sail around the promontory, which, although
fertile, was formerly deserted because the Thracians were not accustomed to
the sea and avoided the coast for fear of pirates. So the Chalcideans and
other Greeks took possession of it, being seafaring people, and caused it to
flourish with commerce and agriculture, and the Thracians were much
gratified by the opportunity for the exchange of products. Finally Philip,
the son of Amyntas, drove out the Chalcideans and other Greeks so that no
traces of them were to be seen except the ruins of their temples. Tillius
sailed along this promontory, again deserted, as he had been ordered to do
by Cassius and Brutus, measuring and mapping places suitable for camps, and
approaching it with his ships now and then in order that the forces of
Norbanus might abandon the pass, under the belief that it was useless to
hold it longer. And it turned out as he had anticipated, for on the
appearance of the ships Norbanus became alarmed for the Sapaean
pass and called on Decidius to hasten from that of the Corpileans to his
assistance, which he did. As soon as the latter pass was abandoned Brutus
and Cassius marched through it. </p>
</div><div n="103" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the stratagem became manifest Norbanus and Decidius occupied the gorge
of the Sapaeans strongly. Again Brutus and Cassius could find no
passage. They fell into discouragement lest they should now have to begin
the roundabout journey which they had disdained, and to turn upon their own
tracks, although pressed by time and the lateness of the season. While they
were in this mood Rhascupolis said that there was a circuitous route (along
the very side of the Sapaean mountain) of three days’ march, which
had been impassable to men up to this time on account of rocks, scarcity of
water, and dense forests. If they would carry their water and make a narrow
but sufficient pathway, they would be so enveloped in shade that they would
not be perceived even by birds. On the fourth day they would come to the
river Harpessus, which falls into the Hebrus, and in one day more they would
be at Philippi, flanking the enemy so as to cut him off completely and leave
him no chance to retreat. They adopted this plan since there was nothing
else to do, and especially because it held out the hope of surrounding so
large a force of the enemy. </p>
</div><div n="104" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>They sent a detachment in advance under command of Lucius Bibulus, in company
with Rhascupolis, to cut a path. They found it a very laborious task, but
they accomplished it nevertheless with enthusiastic zeal, and all the more
when some who had gone ahead came back and said that they had had a distant
view of the river. On the fourth day, fatigued with labor and thirst, the
water which they carried being nearly exhausted, they recollected that it
had been said that they should be in a waterless region only three days. So
they fell into a panic, fearing that they were the victims of a stratagem.
They did not disbelieve those who had been sent in advance and who said that
they had seen the river, but they thought that they themselves had been led
in a different direction. They lost heart and cried aloud, and when they saw
Rhascupolis riding by and exhorting them to have courage, they reviled him
and threw stones at him. While Bibulus was beseeching them with words of
good cheer to persevere to the end, towards evening the river was seen by
those in front, who, as was natural, raised a cry of joy, which was taken up
by those behind in due order until it reached the rear. When Brutus and
Cassius learned this they hurried forward at once, leading on the remainder
of their army through the pathway that had been cleared. Nevertheless, they
did not conceal their doings from the enemy altogether, nor surround them,
for Rhascus, the brother of Rhascupolis, having his suspicions aroused by
the shouting, made a reconnoissance; and when he saw what was being done he
was astonished at so large an army traversing a pathway where no water could
be obtained, and where he thought not even a wild beast could penetrate by
reason of the dense foliage, and he forthwith communicated the news to the
army of Norbanus. The latter retreated by night from the gorge of the
Sapaeans toward Amphipolis. Each of the Thracian brothers received
an ovation in his own army, the one because he had led an army by an unknown
path, the other because he had discovered the movement. </p>
</div><div n="105" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus Brutus and Cassius by an astounding act of audacity advanced to
Philippi, where Tillius also disembarked, and the whole army was there
assembled. Philippi is a city that was formerly called Datus, and before
that Crenides, because there are many springs<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">κρηνίς</foreign>: <q rend="double">a small
spring.</q></note> bubbling around a hill there. Philip fortified it
because he considered it an excellent stronghold against the Thracians, and
named it from himself, Philippi. It is situated on a precipitous hill and
its size is exactly that of the summit of the hill. There are woods on the
north through which Rhascupolis led the army of Brutus and Cassius. On the
south is a marsh extending to the sea. On the east are the gorges of the
Sapaeans and Corpileans, and on the west a very fertile and
beautiful plain extending to the towns of Murcinus and Drabiscus and the
river Strymon, about 350 stades. Here it is said that Cora was carried off
while gathering flowers, and here is the river Zygactes, in crossing which
they say that the yoke of the god’s chariot was broken, from which
circumstance the river received its name.<note resp="translator">This is the mythological tale of the seizure of Proserpine
by Pluto. The Greek name of Proserpine was Persephone, but she was
worshipped at Athens under the name of Cora (the maiden), in conjunction
with her mother, Demeter. The place of her seizure was commonly assigned
to the plain of Enna in Sicily. The word Zygactes in Greek means <q rend="double">broken
yoke.</q> This river is not mentioned by any other author.</note> The plain
slopes downward so that movement is easy to those descending from Philippi,
but toilsome to those going up from Amphipolis. </p>
</div><div n="106" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>There is another hill not far from Philippi which is called the Hill of
Dionysus, in which are gold mines called the Asyla. Ten stades farther are
two other hills, at a distance of eighteen stades from Philippi itself and
eight stades from each other. On these hills Cassius and Brutus were
encamped, the former on the southern and the latter on the northern of the
two. They did not advance against the retreating army of Norbanus because
they learned that Antony was approaching, Octavius having been left behind
at Epidamnus on account of sickness. The plain was admirably situated for
fighting and the precipitous hill-tops for camping, since on one side of
them were marshes and ponds stretching as far as the river Strymon, and on
the other gorges destitute of roads and impassable. Between these hills,
eight stades apart, lay the main pass from Europe to Asia as between gates.
Across this space they built a fortification from camp to camp, leaving a
gate in the middle, so that the two camps became virtually one. Alongside
this fortification flowed a river, which is called by some the Ganga and by
others the Gangites,<note resp="translator">This is the
river Angites mentioned in Herodotus vii. 113, where Xerxes paused and
offered a sacrifice of white horses to the river Strymon. Its present
name is the Anghista.</note> and behind it was the sea, where they could
keep their supplies and shipping in safety. Their depot was on the island of
Thasos, 100 stades distant. Their triremes were anchored at Neapolis, at a
distance of seventy stades. Brutus and Cassius were satisfied with the
position and they proceeded to fortify their camps.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="14" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XIV</head>
<head>Antony arrives at Amphipolis — Advances boldly to Philippi — The Forces
on either Side — Brutus and Cassius hope to starve their Enemies —
Antony seeks to force an Engagement — He attacks the Fortifications of
Cassius — Brutus routs the Army of Octavius and captures his Camp —
Antony puts the Army of Cassius to Flight — Captures and plunders his
Camp</head>
<div n="107" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Antony moved his army rapidly, wishing to anticipate the enemy in occupying
Amphipolis as an advantageous position for the battle. When he found it
already fortified by Norbanus he was delighted. Leaving his apparatus there
and one legion, under the command of Pinarius, he advanced with the greatest
boldness and encamped in the plain at a distance of only eight stades from
the enemy, and straightway the superiority of the enemy’s situation and the
inferiority of his own became evident. The former were on elevated ground,
the latter on the plain; the former procured fuel from the mountains, the
latter from the marshes; the former obtained water from a river, the latter
from wells freshly dug; the former drew their supplies from Thasos,
requiring carriage of only a few stades, while the latter was 350
stades<note resp="translator">This should be 250
stades, according to Schweighäuser, that being approximately
the distance between Amphipolis and Philippi.</note> from Amphipolis.
Still it seems that Antony was compelled to do as he did, for there was no
other hill, and the rest of the plain, lying in a sort of hollow, was liable
to inundation at times from the river; for which reason also the fountains
of water were found fresh and abundant in the wells that were dug there.
Antony’s audacity, although he was driven to it by necessity, confounded the
enemy when they saw him pitch his camp so near them and in such a
contemptuous manner as soon as he arrived. He raised numerous towers and
fortified himself on all sides with ditch, wall, and palisade. The enemy
also completed their fortification wherever the work was defective. Cassius,
observing that Antony’s advance was reckless, extended his fortification at
the only place where it was still wanting, from the camp to the marsh, a
space which had been overlooked on account of its narrowness, so that there
was now nothing unfortified except the cliffs on Brutus’s flank and the
marsh on that of Cassius and the sea lying against the marsh. In the centre
everything was intercepted by ditch, palisade, wall, and gates. </p>
</div><div n="108" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In this way both sides had fortified themselves, in the meantime making trial
of each other by cavalry skirmishes only. When they had done all that they
intended and Octavius had arrived (for, although he was not yet strong
enough for a battle, he could be carried along the ranks reclining in a
litter), he and Antony prepared for battle forthwith. Brutus and Cassius
also drew out their forces on their higher ground, but did not come down.
They decided not to give battle, hoping to wear out the enemy by want of
supplies. There were nineteen legions of infantry on each side, but those of
Brutus and Cassius lacked something of being full, while those of Octavius
and Antony were complete. Of cavalry the latter had 13,000 and the former
20,000, including Thracians on both sides. Thus in the multitude of men, in
the spirit and bravery of the commanders, and in arms and munitions, was
beheld a most magnificent display on both sides; yet they did nothing for
several days. Brutus and Cassius did not wish to engage, but rather to
continue wasting the enemy by lack of provisions, since they themselves had
abundance from Asia, all transported by the sea from close at hand, while
the enemy had nothing in abundance and nothing from their own territory.
They could obtain nothing through merchants from Egypt, since that country
was exhausted by famine, nor from Spain or Africa by reason of Pompeius, nor
from Italy by reason of Murcus and Domitius. Macedonia and Thessaly, which
were the only countries then supplying them, would not suffice much longer. </p>
</div><div n="109" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Mindful chiefly of these facts Brutus and Cassius protracted the war. Antony,
fearful of the same, resolved to force them to an engagement. He formed a
plan of effecting a passage through the marsh secretly, if possible, in
order to get in the enemy’s rear without their knowledge, and cut off their
avenue of supply from Thasos. So he arrayed his forces for battle with all
the standards set each day, so that it might seem that his entire army was
drawn up, while a part of his force was really working night and day cutting
a narrow passage in the marsh, cutting down reeds, throwing up a causeway
and flanking it with stone so that the earth should not fall away, and
bridging the deeper parts with piles, all in the profoundest silence. The
reeds, which were still growing around his passage-way, prevented the enemy
from seeing his work. After working ten days in this manner he sent a column
of troops by night suddenly, who occupied all the strong positions inside
and built several redoubts at the same time. Cassius was amazed at the
ingenuity as well as the secrecy of this work, and he formed the counter
design of cutting Antony off from his redoubts. He carried a transverse wall
across the whole marsh from his camp to the sea, cutting and bridging in the
same manner as Antony had done, and laying a solid foundation for his
rampart, thus intercepting the passage sage made by Antony, so that those
inside could not escape to him, nor he render assistance to them. </p>
</div><div n="110" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Antony saw this about noon, instantly, with rage and fury, he turned his
own army, which was facing in another direction, and led it against the
fortification of Cassius which lay between his camp and the marsh. He
carried tools and ladders intending to take it by storm and force his way
into Cassius’ camp. While he was making this audacious charge, obliquely and
up hill, across the space that separated the two armies, the soldiers of
Brutus were provoked at the insolence of the enemy in dashing boldly athwart
their front while they stood there armed. So they charged of their own
volition, without any order from their officers, took them in flank, and
killed as many as they could reach. The battle once begun they charged upon
the army of Octavius, also, which was drawn up opposite, put it to flight,
pursued it to the camp which Antony and Octavius had in common, and captured
it. Octavius himself was not there, having been warned in a dream to beware
of that day, as he has himself written in his Memoirs.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ὡς αὐτὸς ἐν τοῖς
ὑπομνήμασιν ἔγραψεν.</foreign> Plutarch used the same words with
a single variation, substituting <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἱστορεῖ</foreign> (<emph>relates</emph>) for <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἔγραψεν</foreign> (<emph>has written</emph>).
This identity of language would indicate that they drew from the same
source, yet their accounts of the beginning of the battle differ from
each other. Plutarch says that at a council of war held by Brutus and
Cassius it was resolved to give battle on the following day, although
Cassius favored delay; that after the resolution was taken Cassius was
in good spirits, and expressed his confidence in victory; and that on
the following morning the scarlet robe, which was the Roman signal of
battle, was hung out in the camps of both Brutus and Cassius. Still, the
two accounts are not necessarily conflicting, since one tells what took
place in the republican camp, and the other what occurred in that of the
triumvirs. Plutarch’s authority is Messala Corvinus, who commanded a
legion under Brutus, and who was probably present at the council of war,
since he relates a conversation that he had with Cassius immediately
after it. (<title>Life of Brutus,</title> 39, 40.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="111" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Antony saw that battle was joined he was delighted because he had forced
it, for he had been in trouble about his supplies. He judged it inadvisable
to turn again toward the plain, lest in making the evolution his ranks
should be thrown into disorder. So he continued his charge, as he had begun
it, on the run, and advanced under a shower of missiles, and forced his way
till he struck a body of Cassius’ troops, which had not moved from its
assigned position and which was amazed at this unexpected audacity. He
courageously broke this advance guard and dashed against the fortification
that ran between the marsh and the camp, demolished the palisade, filled up
the ditch, undermined the works, and killed the men at the gates,
disregarding the missiles hurled from the wall, until he had forced an
entrance through the gates, and others had made breaches in the
fortification, and still others had climbed up on the debris. All
this was done so swiftly that those who had just now captured the
fortification met Cassius’ men, who had been at work in the marsh, coming to
the assistance of their friends, and, with a powerful charge, put them to
flight, drove them into the marsh, and then at once wheeled against the camp
of Cassius itself. These were only the men who had scaled the fortification
with Antony, the remainder being engaged in conflict with the enemy on the
other side of the wall. </p>
</div><div n="112" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As the camp was in a strong position it was guarded by only a few men, for
which reason Antony easily overcame them. Cassius’ soldiers outside the camp
were already worsted, and when they saw that the camp was taken they
scattered in disorderly flight. The victory was complete and alike on either
side, Brutus defeating the enemy’s left wing and taking their camp, while
Antony overcame Cassius and ravaged his camp with irresistible courage.
There was great slaughter on both sides, but by reason of the extent of the
plain and the clouds of dust they were ignorant of each other’s fate. When
they learned the facts they recalled their scattered forces. Those who
returned resembled porters rather than soldiers, and did not at once
perceive each other nor see anything clearly. Otherwise either party would
have flung down their burdens and fiercely attacked the others carrying off
plunder in this disorderly fashion. According to conjecture the number of
killed on the side of Cassius, including slave shield-bearers, was about
8000 and on the side of Octavius double that number.<note resp="translator">Messala is the authority for this estimate of the
losses. Plutarch says: <q rend="double">The losses of Brutus and Cassius were 8000,
including the military servants, whom Brutus called Brigas. Messala says
that he thinks those of the enemy were more than twice as great.</q> 
evidently a a very wild guess, like most of our statistics of the
casualties of battles in ancient times. (<title>Life of Brutus,</title>
45.)</note>
</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="15" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XV</head>
<head>Cassius commits Suicide — Brutus weeps over his Body — Naval Engagement
in the Adriatic — The Antonian Fleet destroyed</head>

<div n="113" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Cassius was driven out of his fortifications and no longer had any camp
to go to, he ascended the hill to Philippi and took a survey of the
situation. He could not see accurately on account of the dust, nor could he
see everything, but upon discovering that his own camp was captured he
ordered Pindarus, his shield-bearer, to draw his sword and kill him. While
Pindarus delayed a messenger ran up and said that Brutus had been victorious
on the other wing and was ravaging the enemy’s camp. Cassius merely
answered, <q rend="double">Tell him that I pray his victory may be complete.</q> Then, turning
to Pindarus, he said, <q rend="double">What are you waiting for? Why do you not deliver me
from my shame?</q> Then, as he presented his throat, Pindarus slew him. This is
one account of the death of Cassius. Others say that as some horsemen were
approaching, bringing the good news from Brutus, he took them for enemies
and sent Titinius to find out exactly; that the horsemen pressed around
Titinius joyfully as a friend of Cassius, and at the same time uttered loud
hurrahs; that Cassius, thinking that Titinius had fallen into the hands of
enemies, said, <q rend="double">Have I waited to see my friend torn from me?</q> and that then
he withdrew to a tent with Pindarus, and Pindarus was never seen afterward.
For this reason some persons think that he killed Cassius without orders.
Cassius ended his life on his birthday, on which also the battle was fought,
and Titinius killed himself because he had been too slow.<note resp="translator">The second of these two accounts
of the death of Cassius is found, at greater length, in Plutarch
(<title>Life of Brutus,</title> 43); in Velleius (ii. 70); in
Valerius Maximus (ix. 9. 2); in Dion Cassius (xlvii. 46); and with a
slight variation in Florus (iv. 7).</note>
</p>
</div><div n="114" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Brutus wept over the dead body of Cassius and called him the last of the
Romans, meaning that his equal in virtue would never exist again. He
reproached him for haste and precipitancy, but at the same time he esteemed
him happy because he was freed from cares and troubles, <q rend="double">which,</q> he said,
 <q rend="double">are leading Brutus, ah, whither?</q> He delivered the corpse to friends to be
buried secretly lest the army should be moved to tears at the sight; and
himself passed the whole night, without food and without care for his own
person, restoring order in Cassius’ army. In the morning the enemy drew up
their army in order of battle, so that they might not seem to have been
beaten. Brutus, perceiving their design, exclaimed, <q rend="double">Let us arm also and
make believe that we have suffered no defeat.</q> So he put his forces in line,
and the enemy withdrew. Brutus said to his friends, jeeringly, <q rend="double">They
challenged us when they thought we were tired, but they dared not put us to
the test.</q> </p>
</div><div n="115" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>On the same day that witnessed the battle of Philippi another great calamity
took place in the Adriatic. Domitius Calvinus was bringing two legions of
infantry on transport ships to Octavius, one of which was known as the
Martian legion, a name which had been given to it as a distinction for
bravery. He led also a praetorian cohort of about 2000 men, four
squadrons of horse, and a considerable <emph>corps
d’elite</emph> of other troops, under the convoy of a few
triremes. Murcus and Ahenobarbus met them with 130 war-ships. A few of the
transports that were in front got away under sail. The wind suddenly
failing, the rest floated about in a dead calm on the sea, having been
delivered by some god into the hands of their enemies. The latter, without
danger to themselves, fell upon each ship and crushed it; nor could the
triremes that escorted them render any aid, since they were hemmed in by
reason of their small number. The men who were exposed to this danger
performed many deeds of valor. They hastily lashed their ships together with
ropes and spars to prevent the enemy from breaking through their line. But
when they succeeded in doing this Murcus discharged burning arrows at them.
Then they cast off their fastenings as quickly as possible and separated
from each other on account count of the fire, and thus again were exposed to
being surrounded or rammed by the triremes. </p>
</div><div n="116" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Some of the soldiers, and especially the Martians, who excelled in bravery,
were exasperated that they should lose their lives uselessly, and so killed
themselves rather than be burned to death; others leaped on board the
triremes of the enemy, giving and receiving blows. Vessels half burned
floated a long time, containing men perishing by fire, by hunger, and by
thirst. Others, clinging to masts or planks, were thrown upon barren rocks
or promontories, and of these some were saved unexpectedly. Some of them
were nourished for five days by licking pitch, or chewing sails or ropes,
until the waves bore them to the land. The greater part, vanquished by their
misfortunes, surrendered to the enemy. Seventeen triremes surrendered, and
the men in them took the oath to Murcus. Their general, Calvinus, who was
believed to have perished, returned to Brundusium on his ship five days
later. Such was the catastrophe that befell in the Adriatic on the same day
that the battle of Philippi was fought, whether it be more fitly called a
shipwreck or a naval engagement. The coincidence of the two battles caused
amazement when it became known later.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="16" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XVI</head>
<head>Brutus addresses his Army — Speech of Antony to his Soldiers — He
offers Battle to the Enemy — Scarcity in the Camp of the Triumvirs —
Brutus declines to Fight — His Soldiers become Restive — His Officers
urge him to fight — He yields to them unwillingly — Octavius and
Antony encourage their Forces — Prodigies before the Battle — Second
Battle of Philippi — The Republican Army routed</head>
<div n="117" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Brutus assembled his army and addressed it as follows: <q rend="double">In yesterday’s
engagement, fellow-soldiers, you were in every respect superior to the
enemy. You began the battle eagerly, although without orders, and you
utterly destroyed their far-famed fourth legion, on which their wing placed
its reliance, and all those supporting it as far as their camp, and you took
and plundered their camp first, so that our victory far outweighs the
disaster on our left wing. When it was in your power to finish the whole
work, you chose rather to plunder than to kill the vanquished. Most of you
passed by the enemy and made a rush for his property. We are the superior
again in this, that of our two camps they captured only one, while we took
all of theirs, so that here our gain is twice as great as our loss. So great
are our advantages in the battle. How far we excel them in other respects
you may learn from our prisoners — concerning the scarcity and dearness of
provisions among them, the difficulty of procuring further supplies, and how
near they are to absolute want. They can obtain nothing from Sicily,
Sardinia, Africa, or Spain, because Pompeius, Murcus, and Ahenobarbus with
260 ships close the sea against them. They have already exhausted Macedonia.
They are now dependent on Thessaly alone. How much longer will it suffice?</q> </p>
</div><div n="118" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">When, therefore, you see them eager to fight, bear in mind that they are so
pressed by hunger that they prefer death by battle. We will make it part of
our plan that hunger shall engage them before we do, so that when it is
necessary to fight we shall find them weakened and exhausted. Let us not be
carried away by our ardor before the proper time. Let no one think that
delay implies want of generalship more than haste,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">Μηδὲ βραδυτῆτά τις
ἡγείσθω τὴν ἐμπειρίαν ἤ ταχυτῆτα.</foreign> The text is
probably corrupt at this place. Various suggestions have been made for
its amendment. In the edition of Tollius <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀπειρίαν</foreign> (want of seneralship) is suggested in place of
<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐμπειρίαν.</foreign> This solves the
difficulty with the least possible change of the text.</note> when he
casts his eye on the sea behind us, which sends us aid and provisions and
enables us to win victory without danger if we wait and do not mind the
insults and provocations of the enemy, who are not braver than ourselves, as
yesterday’s work shows, but are trying to avert another danger. Let the zeal
which I now desire you to repress be shown abundantly when I ask it. The
rewards of victory I will pay you in full when it shall please the gods that
our work be finished. And now for your bravery in yesterday’s engagement, I
will give to each soldier 1000 drachmas and to your officers in proportion.</q> 
After speaking thus he distributed the donative to the legions in their
order. Some writers say that he promised to give them also the cities of
Lacedaemon and Thessalonica to plunder. </p>
</div><div n="119" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius and Antony, seeing that Brutus was not willing to fight, assembled
their men, and Antony addressed them thus: <q rend="double">Soldiers, I am sure that the
enemy claim in their speeches a share of yesterday’s victory because they
drove some of us and plundered our camp, but they will show by their action
that it was wholly yours. I promise you that neither to-morrow nor on any
subsequent day will they be willing to fight. It is the clearest proof of
their defeat yesterday and of their lack of courage that, like those who
have been vanquished in public games, they keep out of the arena. Surely
they did not collect so numerous an army in order to pass their time in
fortifications in the desert parts of Thrace. They built their
fortifications when you were still approaching because they were afraid. Now
that you have come they adhere to them because of yesterday’s defeat, on
which account also the older and more experienced of their generals in utter
despair committed suicide, and this act is itself the greatest proof of
their disaster. Since, therefore, they do not accept our challenge and come
down from the mountain, but trust to their rocky fastnesses instead of their
arms, be valliant, O my soldiers of Rome, and force them to it again as you
forced them yesterday. Let us consider it base to yield to those who are
afraid of us, to keep our hands off such sluggards, or, soldiers as we are,
to be unequal to the capture of their fortifications. We did not come hither
to pass our lives in this plain, and if we delay we shall be in want of
everything. If we are well advised we shall prosecute the war sharply, in
order that peace may be of the longest duration possible.</q> </p>
</div><div n="120" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">We, who have not incurred your censure for the onset and the plan of
yesterday’s battle, will devise fresh opportunities and means for this end.
You, on the other hand, when you are asked, repay your generals with your
valor. Nor will you be troubled, after a little, by yesterday’s plundering
of our camp, for our wealth consists not in the property we hold, but in
conquering with might, which will restore to us as victors not only what we
lost yesterday, which is still safe in the enemy’s possession, but the
enemy’s wealth in addition. And if we are in haste<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">καὶ εἰ
ἐπειγόμεθα.</foreign> Nauck suggests <foreign xml:lang="grc">εὐχόμεθα</foreign> in place of the last word, so that it would
read <q rend="double">if we <emph>wish</emph> to take these things let us hasten
to bring on a battle.</q></note> to take these things let us hasten to
bring on a battle. What we took from them yesterday balances what we lost,
and perhaps more, for they brought with them all that they had extorted and
plundered from Asia, while we, coming from our own country, left at home
everything in the way of luxury, and brought with us only what was
necessary. If there was anything lavish in our camp it was the property of
your generals, who will gladly give it all to you as a reward for your
victory. And as compensation for your losses we will give you an additional
reward of 5000 drachmas for each soldier, five times as much to each
centurion, and twice the latter sum to each tribune.</q> </p>
</div><div n="121" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Having spoken thus, he led out his men again on the following day. As the
enemy would not come down then, Antony was disgusted, but he continued to
lead out his men daily. Brutus had a part of his army in line lest he should
be compelled to fight; and with another part he guarded the road by which
his supplies were conveyed. There was a hill very near the camp of Cassius,
which it was difficult for an enemy to occupy because, by reason of its
nearness, it was exposed to arrows from the camp. Nevertheless, Cassius had
placed a guard on it, lest it should be forced unexpectedly. As it had been
abandoned by Brutus, the army of Octavius occupied it by night with four
legions and protected themselves with wickerwork and hides against the
enemy’s bowmen. When this position was secured they transferred ten other
legions a distance of more than five stades toward the sea. Four stades
farther they placed two legions, in order to extend themselves in this
manner quite to the sea, with a view of breaking through the enemy’s line
either along the sea itself, or through the marsh, or in some other way, and
to cut off their supplies. Brutus counteracted this movement by building
fortified posts opposite their camps and in other ways. </p>
</div><div n="122" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The task of Octavius and Antony became pressing, hunger was already felt, and
fear fell upon them more and more each day,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἔς τε μέγεθος καὶ δέος ἑκάστης
ἡμέρας ἐπεγίγνετο</foreign>: an obscure passage. The translation
is in part conjecture.</note> for Thessaly could no longer furnish
sufficient supplies, nor could they hope for anything from the sea, which
was commanded by the enemy everywhere. News of their recent disaster in the
Adriatic having now reached both armies,<note resp="translator">Plutarch says expressly that Brutus was not aware of this
disaster to his enemies; for, although a deserter from the camp of
Octavius came to tell the news, he was not believed, and was not allowed
to see Brutus at all. (<title>Life of Brutus, 47.</title>)</note> it
caused them fresh alarm, as also did the approach of winter while they were
quartered in this muddy plain. Moved by these considerations they sent a
legion of troops to Achaia to collect all the food they could find and send
it to them in haste. As they could not rest under so great an impending
danger, and as their other artifices were of no avail, they ceased offering
battle in the plain and advanced with shouts to the enemy’s fortifications,
and challenged Brutus to fight, reviling and scoffing at him, intending not
so much to besiege him as by a mad rush to bring him to an engagement
against his will. </p>
</div><div n="123" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Brutus adhered to his original intention, and all the more because he knew of
the famine and of his own success in the Adriatic, and of the enemy’s
desperation for want of supplies. He preferred to endure a siege, or
anything else, rather than come to an engagement with men who were
famishing, and whose hopes rested solely on fighting because they despaired
of every other resource. His soldiers, however, without reflection,
entertained a different opinion. They took it hard that they should be shut
up, idle and cowardly, like women, within their fortifications. Their
officers, although they approved of Brutus’ design, were vexed, thinking
that in the present temper of the army they might overpower the enemy more
quickly. Brutus himself was the cause of these murmurs, being of a gentle
and kindly disposition toward all — not like Cassius, who was austere and
imperious in every way, for which reason the army obeyed his orders
promptly, not interfering with his authority, not inquiring the reasons for
his orders, and not criticising them when they had learned them. But in the
case of Brutus they expected nothing else than to share the command with him
on account of his mildness of temper. Finally, the soldiers began openly to
collect together in companies and groups and to ask each other, <q rend="double">Why does
our general put a stigma upon us? How have we offended lately — we who
conquered the enemy and put him to flight; we who slaughtered those opposed
to us and took their camp?</q> Brutus took no notice of these murmurs, nor did
he call an assembly, lest he should be forced from his position, contrary to
his dignity, by the unreasoning multitude, and especially by the
mercenaries, who, like fickle slaves seeking new masters, always rest their
hopes of safety on desertion to the enemy. </p>
</div><div n="124" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>His officers kept teasing and urging him to make use of the eagerness of the
army now, which would speedily bring glorious results. If the battle should
turn out adversely, they could fall back to their walls and put the same
fortifications between themselves and the enemy. Brutus was especially vexed
with these, for they were his officers, and he grieved that they, who were
exposed to the same peril as himself, should capriciously side with the
soldiers in preferring a quick and doubtful chance to a victory without
danger; but, to the ruin of himself and them, he yielded, chiding them with
these words, <q rend="double">I seem to be carrying on war like Pompey the Great, not so
much commanding as commanded.</q> I think that Brutus restricted himself to
these words in order to conceal his greatest fear, lest those of his
soldiers who had formerly served under Caesar should become
disaffected and desert to the enemy. This both himself and Cassius had
apprehended from the beginning, and they had been careful not to give any
excuse for such disaffection toward themselves. </p>
</div><div n="125" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>So Brutus led out his army unwillingly and formed them in line of battle
before his walls, ordering them not to advance very far from the hill so
that they might have a safe retreat if necessary and a good position for
hurling darts at the enemy. In each army the men exchanged exhortations with
each other. There was great eagerness for battle, and unbounded confidence.
On the one side was the fear of famine, on the other a well-deserved shame
that they had constrained their general to fight when he still favored
delay, and fear lest they should come short of their promises and prove
weaker than their boastings, and expose themselves to the charge of rashness
instead of winning praise for good counsel; because also Brutus, riding
through the ranks on horseback, showed himself before them with a severe
countenance and reminded them in a few words of what the opportunity
offered. <q rend="double">You want to fight,</q> he said; <q rend="double">you force me to battle when I am
able to conquer otherwise.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ὑμεῖς με ἑτέρως ἔχοντα νικᾶν
ἐβιάσασθε.</foreign> The Latin version of Candidus reads, <q rend="double">You
have forced me, who thought differently, and had victory in my grasp, to
come to battle.</q> Mendelssohn thinks that there is a lacuna in the
existing text after the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἑτέρως,</foreign>
which should be filled in accordance with the version of Candidus.
Professor Wright suggests the rendering I have given above, which is
clear and forceful without any change of the text.</note> Do not falsify
my hopes or your own. You have the advantage of the higher ground and
everything safe in your rear. The enemy’s position is the one of peril
because he lies between you and famine.</q> With these words he passed on, the
soldiers telling him to trust them and echoing his words with shouts of
confidence. </p>
</div><div n="126" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius and Antony rode through their own ranks shaking hands with those
nearest them, and urging them in the most serious manner to do their duty,
and not concealing the danger of famine, because they believed that that
would be the greatest incitement to bravery. <q rend="double">Soldiers,</q> they said, <q rend="double">we have
found the enemy. We have before us those whom we sought to catch outside of
their fortifications. Let none of you shame his own challenge or prove
unequal to his own threat. Let no one prefer hunger, that unmanageable and
distressing evil, to the walls and bodies of the enemy which they will yield
to bravery, to the sword, to despair. Our situation at this moment is so
pressing that nothing can be postponed till to-morrow, but this very day
must decide for us either a complete victory or an honorable death. If we
conquer we gain in one day and by one blow provisions, money, ships, and
camps, and the prizes of victory offered by ourselves. Such will be the
result if, from our first onset upon them, we are mindful of the necessity
urging us on, and if, after breaking their ranks, we immediately cut them
off from their gates and drive them upon the rocks or into the plain, so
that the war may not spring up again or these enemies get away for another
period of idleness — the only warriors who are so weak as to rest their
hopes, not on fighting, but on declining to fight.</q> </p>
</div><div n="127" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In this way Octavius and Antony roused the spirit of those with whom they
came in contact. The emulation of the troops was excited to show themselves
worthy of their commanders and also to escape the danger of famine, which
had been greatly augmented by the naval disaster in the Adriatic. They
preferred, if necessary, to suffer in battle, with the hope of success,
rather than be wasted by an irresistible foe. Inspired by these thoughts,
which each man exchanged with his nearest neighbor, the spirit of the two
armies was wonderfully raised and both were filled with undaunted courage.
They did not now remember that they were fellow-citizens of their enemies,
but hurled threats at each other as though they had been enemies by birth
and descent, so much did the anger of the moment extinguish reason and
nature in them. Both sides divined equally that this day and this battle
would decide the fate of Rome completely; and it did decide it. </p>
</div><div n="128" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The day was consumed in preparations till the ninth hour,<note resp="translator">The Roman day, from sunrise to sunset, was
divided into twelve hours. The ninth hour was three o’clock in the
afternoon.</note> at which time two eagles fell upon each other and
fought in the space between the armies, amid the profoundest silence. When
the one on the side of Brutus took flight his enemies raised a great shout
and battle was joined.<note resp="translator">Plutarch
relates this and several other prodigies on the authority of Publius
Volumnius, a philosopher, who was serving in the army under Brutus. One
of these was of a very unusual kind. The arm of one of the centurions in
Brutus’ camp sweated oil of roses; and although it was several times
wiped and dried, it did not cease. (<title>Life of Brutus,</title> 48.)
What this portended we are not informed.</note> The onset was superb and
terrible. They had little need of arrows, stones, or javelins, which are
customary in war, for they did not resort to the usual manœuvres
and tactics of battles, but, coming to close combat with naked swords, they
slew and were slain, seeking to break each other’s ranks. On the one side it
was a fight for self-preservation rather than victory; on the other for
victory and for the satisfaction of the general who had been forced to fight
against his will. The slaughter and the groans were terrible. The bodies of
the fallen were carried back and others stepped into their places from the
rear ranks. The generals flew hither and thither overlooking everything,
exciting the men by their ardor, exhorting the toilers to toil on, and
relieving those who were exhausted so that there was always fresh courage at
the front. Finally, the soldiers of Octavius, either from fear of famine, or
by the good fortune of Octavius himself (for the soldiers of Brutus were not
blameworthy), pushed back the enemy’s line as though they were putting in
motion a very heavy machine. The latter were driven back step by step,
slowly at first and without loss of courage. Presently their ranks began to
dissolve and they retreated more rapidly, and then the second and third
ranks in the rear retreated with them, all mingled together in disorder,
crowded by each other and by the enemy, who pressed upon them without
ceasing until it became plainly a flight. The soldiers of Octavius, then
especially mindful of the order they had received, seized the gates of the
enemy’s fortification, but at great risk to themselves because they were
exposed to missiles from above and in front, but they prevented a great many
of the enemy from gaining entrance. These fled, some to the sea, and some
through the river Zygactes to the mountains. </p>
</div><div n="129" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The enemy having been routed, the generals divided the remainder of the work
between themselves, Octavius to capture those who should break out of the
camp and to watch the main camp, while Antony was everywhere, and everywhere
attacking, falling upon the fugitives and those who still held together, and
upon their other camping-places, crushing all with vehement impetuosity.
Fearing lest the leaders should escape him and collect another army, he
despatched cavalry upon the roads and outlets of the field of battle to
capture those who were trying to escape. These divided their work; some of
them hurried up the mountain with Rhascus, the Thracian, who was sent with
them on account of his knowledge of the roads. They surrounded the fortified
positions and escarpments, hunted down the fugitives, and kept watch upon
those inside. Others pursued Brutus himself. Lucilius seeing them rushing on
furiously, surrendered himself, pretending to be Brutus, and asked them to
take him to Antony instead of Octavius; for which reason chiefly he was
believed to be Brutus trying to avoid his implacable enemy. When Antony
heard that they were bringing him, he went to meet him, with a pause to
reflect on the fortune, the dignity, and the virtue of the man, and thinking
how he should receive Brutus. As he was approaching, Lucilius presented
himself, and said with perfect boldness, <q rend="double">You have not captured Brutus, nor
will virtue ever be taken prisoner by vice. I deceived these men and so here
I am.</q> Antony, observing that the horse-men were ashamed of their mistake,
consoled them, saying, <q rend="double">The game you have caught for me is not worse, but
better than you think — as much better as a friend is than an enemy.</q> Then
he committed Lucilius to the care of one of his friends, and later took him
into his own service and employed him in a confidential capacity.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="17" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XVII</head>
<head>Brutus escapes to the Mountains — His Officers decline to fight again —
Brutus commits Suicide — Character of Brutus and Cassius — Their Crime
against Caesar — The Spectre in Brutus’ Tent — Death of Young
Cato — Death of Portia — Magnitude of the Victory — Its Lasting
Results</head>
<div n="130" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Brutus fled to the mountains with a considerable force, intending to return
to his camp by night, or to move down to the sea. But since all the roads
were encompassed by guards he passed the night under arms with all his
party, and it is said that, looking up to the stars, he exclaimed: —
<quote><q rend="double">Forget not, Zeus, the author of these ills.</q><note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">Ζεῦ, μὴ λάθοι σε
   τῶνδ’ ὃς ἀίτιος κακῶν.</foreign> From the
<title>Medea</title> of Euripides, 332.</note></quote></p>
<p>referring to Antony. It is said that Antony himself repeated this saying at a
later period in the midst of his own dangers, regretting that, when he might
have associated himself with Cassius and Brutus, he had become the tool of
Octavius. At the present time, however, Antony passed the night under arms
with his outposts over against Brutus, fortifying himself with a breastwork
of dead bodies and spoils collected together. Octavius toiled till midnight
and then retired on account of his illness, leaving Norbanus to watch the
enemy’s camp. </p>
</div><div n="131" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>On the following day Brutus, seeing the enemy still lying in wait for him,
and having less than four full legions, which had ascended the mountain with
him, thought it best not to address himself to his troops, but to their
officers, who were ashamed and repentant of their fault. To them he sent to
put them to the test and to learn whether they were willing to break through
the enemy’s lines and regain their own camp, which was still held by their
troops who had been left there. These officers, though they had rushed to
battle unadvisedly, had been of good courage for the most part, but now,
misled by a god, gave to their general the undeserved answer that he should
look out for himself, that they had tempted fortune many times, and that
they would not throw away the last remaining hope of accommodation. Then
Brutus said to his friends, <q rend="double">I am no longer useful to my country if such is
the temper of these men,</q> and calling Strato, the Epirote, who was one of
his friends, gave him the order to stab him. While Strato was still willing
to deliberate, Brutus called one of his servants. Then Strato said, <q rend="double">Your
friend shall not come short of your servants in executing your last
commands, if the decision is actually reached.</q> With these words he thrust
his sword into the side of Brutus, who did not shrink or turn away.<note resp="translator">Dion Cassius (xlvii. 49) says that
before killing himself Brutus repeated the words of Hercules: <q rend="double">Delusive
virtue, thou art but a name. I cultivated thee as a reality, but thou
art the slave of fortune.</q> Florus (iv. 7) puts in the mouth of Brutus
nearly the same words: <q rend="double"><title>Non in re, sed in verbo tantum esse
virtutem.</title></q> Brutus’ dying speech given by Plutarch is much
longer, as well as more appropriate and dignified, and better entitled
to credence.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="132" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>So died Cassius and Brutus, two most noble and illustrious Romans, and of
incomparable virtue, but for one crime. Although they belonged to the party
of Pompey the Great, and had been the enemies, in peace and in war, of Gaius
Caesar, he made them his friends, and from being friends he was
treating them as sons. The Senate at all times had a peculiar attachment to
them, and commiseration for them when they fell into misfortune. On account
of those two it granted amnesty to all the assassins, and when they took
flight it bestowed governorships on them in order that they should not be
exiles; not that it was disregardful of Gaius Caesar or rejoiced at
what had happened to him, for it admired his bravery and good fortune, gave
him a public funeral at his death, ratified his acts, and had for a long
time awarded the magistracies and governorships to his nominees, considering
that nothing better could be devised than what he proposed. But its zeal for
these two men and its solicitude for them brought it under suspicion of
complicity in the assassination, — so much were those two held in honor by
all. By the most illustrious of the exiles they were preferred to [Sextus]
Pompeius, although he was nearer and not implacable to the triumvirs, while
they were farther away and irreconcilable. </p>
</div><div n="133" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When it became necessary for them to take up arms, two whole years had not
elapsed ere they had brought together upward of twenty legions of infantry
and something like 20,000 cavalry, and 200 ships of war, with corresponding
apparatus and a vast amount of money, some of it from willing and some from
unwilling contributors. They carried on wars with many peoples and with
cities and with men of the adverse faction successfully. They brought under
their sway all the nations from Macedonia to the Euphrates. Those whom they
had fought against they had brought into alliance with them and had found
them most faithful. They had had the services of the independent kings and
princes, and in some small measure even of the Parthians, who were enemies
of the Romans; but they did not wait for them to come and take part in the
decisive battle, lest this barbarous and hostile race should become
accustomed to encounters with the Romans. Most extraordinary of all was the
fact that the greater part of their army had been the soldiers of Gaius
Caesar and wonderfully attached to him, yet they were won over by
the very murderers of Caesar and followed them more faithfully
against Caesar’s son than they had followed Antony, who was
Caesar’s companion in arms and colleague; for not one of them
deserted Brutus and Cassius even when they were vanquished, while some of
them had abandoned Antony at Brundusium before the war began. The reason for
their service, both under Pompey aforetime and now under Brutus and Cassius,
was not their own interest, but the cause of democracy; a specious name
indeed, but generally hurtful.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ὑπὲρ δημοκρατίας, ὀνόματος εὐειδοῦς
μὲν ἀλυσιτελοῦς δὲ ἀεί.</foreign> The Latin version of Geslen
rendered this passage <foreign xml:lang="lat">nomen reipublicae, speciosum quidem sed
non semper commodum</foreign> (the name of the republic, specious
indeed, but not always advantageous); and this led
Schweighäuser to suggest doubtfully <foreign xml:lang="grc">οὐ
λυσιτελοῦς</foreign> in place of <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀλυσιτελοῦς,</foreign> in which case the meaning would be <q rend="double">not
always useful,</q> instead of <q rend="double">always hurtful.</q> Plutarch says that
government by the majority seemed to be no longer possible to the
Romans, and that a monarchy was needed; and accordingly Providence, in
order to remove the only man who stood in the way of the one who was
able to govern (meaning Octavius), prevented Brutus from receiving the
news of his victory in the Adriatic, etc. (<title>Life of
Brutus,</title> 47.)</note> Both of the leaders, when they thought
they could no longer be useful to their country, alike despised their own
lives. In that which related to their cares and labors Cassius gave his
attention strictly to war, like a gladiator to his antagonist. Brutus,
wherever he might be, wanted to see and hear everything because he was by
nature a seeker after knowledge. </p>
</div><div n="134" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Against all these virtues and merits must be set down the crime against
Caesar, which was not an ordinary or a small one, for it was
committed unexpectedly against a friend, ungratefully against a benefactor
who had spared them in war, and nefariously against the head of the state,
in the senate-house, against a pontiff clothed in his sacred vestments,
against a ruler without an equal, who was most useful above all other men to
Rome and its empire. For these reasons Heaven was incensed against them and
often forewarned them of their doom. When Cassius was performing a
lustration for his army his lictor presented his garland wrong side up. A
gilded statue of Victory dedicated to Cassius fell down. Many birds hovered
over his camp, but uttered no sound,<note resp="translator">Dion Cassius (xlvii. 40) favors us with a long chapter,
full of prodigies bearing upon the battles of Philippi. The prodigy of
the birds is thus described: <q rend="double">But that which especially indicated to
Brutus and Cassius their ruin, so that it was plain to their
adversaries, was the great number of vultures and other carrion-eating
birds that soared above them only, and looked down at them screaming and
squeaking in a fearful and awe-inspiring way.</q> Florus (iv. 7) mentions
the same phenomenon: <q rend="double">Birds accustomed to feed on dead bodies flew
around the camp as though it were already their own.</q></note> and swarms
of bees continually settled upon it. While Brutus was celebrating his
birthday at Samos it is said that in the midst of the feast, although not a
ready man with such quotations, he shouted out this verse without any
apparent cause: — <quote><q rend="double">A cruel fate O’ertakes me, aided by Latona’s
son.</q><note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀλλά με μοἶρ’ ὀλοὴ καὶ Λητοῦς ἔκτανεν
υἱός</foreign>: the dying words of
Patroclus.</note></quote></p>
<p><title>Iliad,</title> xvi. 849. <title>Bryant’s translation.</title></p>
<p>Once when he was about to cross from Asia into Europe with his army, and
while he was awake at night and the light was burning low, he beheld an
apparition of extraordinary form standing near him, and when he boldly asked
who of men or gods it might be, the spectre answered, <q rend="double">I am thy evil genius,
Brutus. I shall appear to thee again at Philippi.</q><note resp="translator">There is a noteworthy similarity of Greek words
between Plutarch and Appian in relating the conversation between Brutus
and the spectre, viz., Plutarch: <quote xml:lang="grc"><q rend="double">Τίς ποτʼ
ὤν,</q> εἶπεν, <q rend="double">ἀνθρώπων ἢ θεῶν ἢ τί βουλόμενος ἥκεις
ὡς ἡμᾶς;</q> Ὑποφθέγγεται δὲ αὐτῷ τὸ φάσμα, <q rend="double">Ὁ σὸς, ὧ
Βροῦτε, δαίμων κακός· ὄψει δέ με περὶ
Φιλίππους.</q></quote> Appian: <quote xml:lang="grc">καὶ πυθέσθαι
μὲν εὐθαρσῶς, ὅστις ἀνθρώπων ἢ θεῶν εἴη· τὸ δὲ φάσμα
εἰπεῖν, Ὁ σὸς, ὦ Βροῦτε, δαίμων κακός· ὀφθήσομαι δέ
σοι καὶ ἐν Φιλίπποις</quote></note> And it is said that it
did appear to him before the last battle. When the soldiers were going out
to the fight an Ethiopian met them in front of the gates, and as they
considered this a bad omen they immediately cut him in pieces. It was due to
divine interposition, no doubt, that Cassius gave way to despair without
reason after a drawn battle, and that Brutus was forced from his policy of
wise delay to an engagement with men who were pressed by hunger, while he
himself had supplies in abundance and the command of the sea, so that his
calamity proceeded rather from his own troops than from the enemy. Although
they had participated in many engagements, they never received any hurt in
battle, but both became the slayers of themselves, as they had been of
Cae sar. Such was the punishment that overtook Cassius and Brutus. </p>
</div><div n="135" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Antony found the body of Brutus, wrapped it in his best purple garment,
burned it, and sent the ashes to his mother, Servilia. Brutus’ army, when it
learned of his death, sent envoys to Octavius and Antony and obtained
pardon, and was divided between their armies. It consisted of about 14,000
men. Besides these a large number who were in garrisons surrendered. The
garrisons themselves and the enemy’s camp were given to the soldiers of
Octavius and Antony to be plundered. Of the distinguished men in Brutus’
camp some perished in the battles, others killed themselves as the two
generals had done, others purposely continued fighting till death. Among
these men of note were Lucius Cassius, a nephew of Cassius himself, and
Cato, the son of Cato. The latter charged upon the enemy many times; then,
when his men began to retreat, he threw off his helmet, either that he might
be recognized, or be easily hit, or for both reasons.<note resp="translator">Plutarch says that the son of Cato refused to
retreat or yield, but fought to the last, declaring who he was and
pronouncing his father’s name, and finally fell on a heap of slain
enemies. (<title>Life of Brutus,</title> 49.)</note> Labeo, a man
renowned for learning, father of the Labeo who is still celebrated as a
jurisconsult, dug a trench in his tent the size of his body, gave orders to
his slaves in reference to the remainder of his affairs, made such
arrangements as he desired for his wife and children, and gave letters to
his domestics to carry to them. Then, taking his most faithful slave by the
right hand and whirling him around, as is the Roman custom in granting
freedom,<note resp="translator">The legal form of
manumission in Rome was to seize the slave by the hand, whirl him around
once, and give him a slight push. The word
<emph>manumission</emph> (sending by the hand) is supposed to
have been derived from this ceremony.</note> he handed him a sword as he
turned, and presented his throat. And so his tent became his tomb. </p>
</div><div n="136" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Rhascus, the Thracian, brought many troops from the mountains. He asked and
received as his reward the pardon of his brother, Rhascupolis, from which it
was made plain that from the beginning these Thracians had not been at
variance with each other, but that seeing two great and hostile armies
coming into conflict near their territory, they took sides in the contest in
such a way that the victor might save the vanquished. Portia, the wife of
Brutus and sister of the younger Cato, when she learned that both had died
in the manner described, although very strictly watched by domestics, seized
some coals of fire that they were carrying, and swallowed them.<note resp="translator">This tale of the death of Portia
from swallowing live coals was widely current in the ancient world, yet
there is good reason for doubting it. Plutarch says that there was a
letter of Brutus in circulation, speaking of the death of Portia, and
accusing his friends of neglecting her in her last illness. (<title>Life
of Brutus,</title> 53.) There is a letter from Cicero to Brutus
extant, consoling the latter for the death of some one very near to him.
As he speaks of the loss as one <foreign xml:lang="lat">cui simile in terris nihil
fuit</foreign> (which has not its like upon earth), it could hardly
have been anything else than that of a wife. (<title>Ad Brutum,</title>
9.)</note> Of the members of the nobility who escaped to Thasos some
took ship from thence, others committed themselves with the remains of the
army to the judgment of Messala Corvinus and Lucius Bibulus, men of equal
rank, to do for all what they should decide to do for themselves. These came
to an arrangement with Antony and Octavius, whereby they delivered to Antony
on his arrival at Thasos the money and arms, besides abundant supplies and a
great quantity of war material, there in store. </p>
</div><div n="137" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus did Octavius and Antony by perilous daring and by two infantry
engagements achieve a success, the like of which was never before known; for
never before had such numerous and powerful Roman armies come in conflict
with each other. These soldiers were not enlisted from the ordinary
conscription, but were picked men. They were not new levies, but under long
drill and arrayed against each other, not against foreign or barbarous
races. Speaking the same language and using the same tactics, being of like
discipline and power of endurance, they were for these reasons evenly
matched. Nor was there ever such fury and daring in war as here, when
citizens contended against citizens, families against families, and
fellow-soldiers against each other. The proof of this is that, taking both
battles into the account, the number of the slain among the victors appeared
to be not less [than among the vanquished]. </p>
</div><div n="138" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus the army of Antony and Octavius confirmed the prediction of their
generals, passing in one day and by one blow from extreme danger of famine
and fear of destruction to lavish wealth, absolute security, and glorious
victory. That result came about which Antony and Octavius had predicted as
they advanced into battle. Their form of government was decided by that
day’s work chiefly, and they have not gone back to democracy yet. Nor was
there any further need of similar contentions with each other, except the
strife between Antony and Octavius not long afterward, which was the last
that took place between Romans. The events that transpired after the death
of Brutus, under Sextus Pompeius and the friends of Cassius and Brutus, who
escaped with the very considerable remains of their extensive war material,
were not to be compared to the former in daring or in the devotion of men,
cities, and armies to their leaders; nor did any of the nobility, nor the
Senate, nor the same glory, attend them as attended Brutus and Cassius. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="appendix" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>BY THE TRANSLATOR</head>
  <div n="0" type="textpart" subtype="section">
  <head>The Death of Cicero</head>
<p><q rend="double">Just before the arrival of the triumvirs Marcus Cicero left the city,
considering it certain that he had no more chance of being saved from the
vengeance of Antony than Brutus and Cassius had of escaping that of
Octavius, — which was the fact. He fled first to his Tusculan villa and
thence proceeded by cross-roads to that of Formiae in order to take
ship at Caieta. There, after advancing several times seaward, he was driven
back by adverse winds, and again he found himself unable to endure the
tossing of the ship on the gloomy rolling waves, and he began at length to
grow weary both of flight and of life. So he returned to his upper villa,
which was a little more than a mile from the shore, saying, <q rend="single">I will die in
my fatherland that I have so often saved.</q> It is well established that his
slaves were ready to fight for him bravely and faithfully, but that he
ordered them to put down the litter and endure with patience whatever an
adverse fate should compel. As he leaned out of the litter and offered his
neck unmoved, his head was cut off. Nor did this satisfy the senseless
cruelty of the soldiers. They cut off his hands, also, for the offence of
having written something against Antony. Thus the head was brought to Antony
and placed by his order between the two hands on the rostra, where, often as
consul, often as a consular, and, that very year against Antony, he had been
heard with admiration of his eloquence, the like of which no other human
voice ever uttered. The people, raising their eyes bedimmed with tears,
could scarcely bear the sight of his dismembered parts. He lived sixty-three
years, so that in the absence of violence his death could not have been
considered premature. His genius served him well both in his works and in
the rewards thereof. He enjoyed the favors of fortune for a long time, yet
in the intervals of his protracted career of prosperity he suffered some
severe blows, exile, the ruin of the party he had espoused, the death of his
daughter, and his end so sad and bitter, none of which calamities did he
bear as became a man except his death, which to one who weighs the matter
impartially must seem the less undeserved, since he suffered nothing more
cruel at the hands of his victorious enemy than he would himself have
inflicted if fortune had put the same power in his hands.<note resp="translator">Both in letters and in public
speeches Cicero declared that if he had had a part in the assassination
of Caesar he would have put Antony to death also. Thus in the
letter to Cassius (<title>Ad Fan.</title> xii. 3) he says: <q rend="double">The fury of
your friend [Antony] increases from day to day. For a first example,
there is the statue which he has placed in the forum inscribed <q rend="single">To the
most worthy Father of his Country,</q> whereby you are stigmatized not only
as assassins, but even as parricides. <title>You</title> stigmatized, do
I say? Rather myself, for this madman says that I was the leader in your
most noble deed. Would that I had been! In that case he would not be
troubling us now.</q> In the second Philippic (7) he says that if Rome had
the same kind of a leader now that she had in the time of the conspiracy
of Catiline, Antony would share the fate of those conspirators. When
Cicero wrote the second Philippic he knew that he took his life in his
hand. Addressing, himself to Antony, he said: <q rend="double">I defended the republic
when I was young, I will not abandon it now that I am old. I despised
the sword of Catiline, I will not quail before yours. I will offer my
body freely if my death can bring back liberty to the state. . . . Death
is even desirable to me, Conscript Fathers, after the honors I have
gained and the deeds I have done. I ask for only these two things:
first, that dying, I may leave the Roman people free; the immortal gods
can grant me nothing that I desire more. The other is that the rewards
of each man may be in proportion to what he has deserved of the
republic.</q> (<title>Phil.</title> ii. 46.)</note> Yet if we weigh his
virtues and his faults he must be pronounced a great, energetic, and ever
memorable man, to fitly sound whose praises another Cicero would be needed.</q> 
(<title>Livy,</title> cxx.) This judgment of the gravest of Roman
historians is the one which the better part of mankind have ratified in all
succeeding ages. </p>
<p>The glowing words of Velleius also deserve a place here; and these likewise
have found their echo in all later generations, viz.: <q rend="double">You have gained
nothing, Mark Antony (for the indignation bursting from my mind and breast
compels me to exceed the intended character of this work); you have gained
nothing, I say, by paying the price for closing that celestial voice and
cutting off that most noble head, and instigating, by a cruel reward, the
death of a man who had once been so great a consul and the saviour of the
republic. You deprived Marcus Cicero of a life of anxiety and a feeble old
age, of an existence worse under your chieftainship than death under your
triumvirate. But the fame and glory of his deeds and words you have not
taken from him in the least, but rather augumented. He lives and will live
in the memory of all ages. So long as this body of the natural universe,
whether created by chance or by providence, or however constituted, which he
almost alone of the Romans penetrated with his intellect, embraced with his
genius, and illuminated with his eloquence, shall endure, it will bear the
praise of Cicero as coeval with it. All posterity will admire what he wrote
against you and execrate what you did against him, and sooner shall the
human race perish from the earth than his fame decay.</q> 
(<title>Velleius,</title> ii. 66.)</p>
<p>Valerius Maximus, under the heading of <q rend="double">Ingratitude among the Romans,</q> says:
 <q rend="double">Cicero, at the instance of M. Caelius, with no less zeal than
eloquence, defended C. Popilius Laena, a man of Picenum, and,
though he had a doubtful case, returned him in safety to his home. This
Popilius, of his own accord, although he had never afterward been harmed by
Cicero by word or deed, asked Antony to send him to pursue and kill that
illustrious proscript. When he had obtained this detestable commission he
hastened with joy and gladness to Caieta and ordered that man who, not to
mention his very great dignity, had certainly been Laena’s
preserver, and was entitled to veneration for the zealous and distinguished
service rendered in his private capacity, to lay bare his throat. Then, with
absolute coolness, he cut off the head of Roman eloquence and the most
renowned right hand of peace. Loaded with these, as with the honorable
spoils of war, he returned gayly to the city. As he bore the infamous burden
it never occurred to him that he was carrying the very head that once had
pleaded eloquently for his own. Words are powerless to stigmatize this
monster, since no other Cicero exists to deplore in fitting terms the
misfortune that befell that one.</q> (<title>Val. Max.,</title> v. 3. 4.)</p>
<p>The following is Plutarch’s account of Cicero’s death. <q rend="double">While these events
were in progress Cicero was at his country place near Tusculum, and his
brother was with him. When they heard of the proscription they decided to go
down to Astura, Cicero’s place on the sea-coast, and sail thence to
Macedonia to join Brutus, for it was already rumored that he had mastered
those parts. They were conveyed, sorrow-stricken, in litters, and often
stopped on the road, bringing their litters near together, and condoled with
each other. Quintus was particularly disturbed as he remembered his needy
condition. So he said that, as he had brought nothing from home, and as
Cicero’s provision was also very scanty, it would be best for the latter to
continue his flight, while Quintus should return home and provide himself
with necessaries. After this was decided upon they embraced each other,
wept, and went different ways. Quintus, not many days later, was betrayed by
his servants to the pursuers, and was killed, together with his son. Cicero
was conveyed to Astura, where he found a ship ready, in which he embarked
and sailed as far as Circaeum with a favorable wind. The pilots
wished to proceed from that place immediately, but Cicero, either fearing
the sea, or not having lost all faith in Octavius, went ashore and travelled
100 stades by land toward Rome. Again he became anxious, changed his mind,
and went back to the sea-shore at Astura. There he passed the night in great
trouble and perplexity. He even contemplated going secretly to the house of
Octavius and killing himself on his hearthstone, in order to bring divine
vengeance upon him, but the fear of torture changed his purpose. Then,
falling a prey to other perplexed and varying counsels, he allowed his
servants to convey him by sea to Caieta, where he had a country place, an
agreeable retreat in the summer season when the north winds blow fresh.
There was a small temple on the sea-shore at this place, out of which crows
flew in large numbers and with loud noise, to Cicero’s ship as it neared the
land, and, alighting on either side of the yard-arm, some of them croaked
and others pecked at the ends of the ropes. This seemed to all to be an ill
omen. Nevertheless, Cicero disembarked and proceeded to his villa, where he
went to bed to take a little rest. The crows alighted at the window, where
they clamored tumultuously, and one of them flew down upon the bed where
Cicero was covered up, and, little by little, drew the covering from his
face with its beak. When the servants saw this they reproached themselves
for remaining idle spectators of their master’s fate, and not rescuing him
in his undeserved distress, while the brute creation was lending him aid.
So, partly by entreaty, partly by force, they put him in the litter and
carried him toward the sea-shore.</q></p>
<p><q rend="double; merge">In the meantime the murderers were coming, under the command of the
centurion Herennius and the military tribune Popilius, whom Cicero had once
defended when he was prosecuted for killing his own father. Finding the
doors closed, they broke them open, but they did not find Cicero, and those
who were within said that they did not know where he was. It is said that a
young man named Philologus, who had been educated by Cicero in the liberal
arts and sciences, a freedman of his brother Quintus, told the tribune that
they were carrying the litter through the bushy shaded walks toward the sea.
The tribune took a few men and ran around to the exit of these paths.
Herennius kept his course along the path, and when Cicero saw him he ordered
the servants to put down the litter. Then, leaning his chin on his left hand
as was his custom, he looked straight at the murderers. His haggard
appearance and his unshaven face, wasted with anxiety, caused most of them
to hide their own heads while Herennius murdered him. He was killed while
holding his neck out of the litter, being then in the sixty-fourth year of
his age. By Antony’s command his head was cut off and also the hands with
which he wrote the Philippics, for he styled his orations against Antony the
Philippics, and they are so called to this day.</q> (<title>Life of
Cicero,</title> 47-48). It thus appears from Plutarch’s account, as well
as from Livy’s, that, if Cicero had really desired to escape, he had
abundant opportunity. It was perhaps the intention of Octavius and Lepidus
that he should do so.</p>
<p>Dion Cassius gives a very brief account of Cicero’s death, but adds some
particulars about the indignities offered to his remains, viz.: <q rend="double">When the
head of Cicero was brought to the triumvirs (for he was captured and killed
while fleeing), Antony heaped many bitter reproaches on it, and then ordered
that it be put in a more conspicuous place than the others on the rostra, so
that in the place where Cicero had been heard speaking against himself it
might be seen, together with the right hand, as that also had been cut off.
Before it was removed Fulvia took the head in her hands, and, after abusing
it with bitter words and spitting on it, placed it on her knees, opened the
mouth, drew out the tongue, and pierced it with pins that she used in
dressing her hair, all the time heaping disgusting epithets upon it.</q> 
(<title>Dion,</title> xlvii. 8.) </p></div>
</div>
</div>
<div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="book">
<head>BOOK V</head>
 <div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER I</head>
<head>The Scattered Republican forces — How they were reassembled — Octavius
and Antony after the Battle — Antony in Asia — Makes a Public Speech
at Ephesus — Levies Ten Years’ Taxes — Distress of the Inhabitants —
Antony makes a tour of The Eastern Provinces — Meets Cleopatra in
Cilicia and becomes her Slave — The Murder of Arsinoe — Unsuccessful
Attack on Palmyra — Antony goes to Egypt to join Cleopatra</head>

<div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>AFTER the death of Cassius and Brutus, Octavius returned to Italy. Antony
proceeded to Asia, where he met Cleopatra, queen of Egypt, and succumbed to
her charms at first sight. This passion brought ruin upon them and upon all
Egypt besides. For this reason a part of this book will treat of Egypt — a
small part, however, not worth mentioning in the title, since it is
incidental to the narrative of the civil wars, which constitutes much the
larger portion. Other similar civil wars took place after Cassius and
Brutus, but there was no one in command of all the forces as they had been.
The later wars were sporadic. But, finally, Sextus Pompeius, the younger son
of Pompey the Great, the last remaining leader of that faction, was slain,
as Brutus and Cassius had been, and Lepidus was deprived of his share of the
triumvirate, and the whole government of the Romans was centred in two only,
Antony and Octavius. These events came about in the following manner. </p>
</div><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Cassius, surnamed Parmesius,<note resp="translator">This
man is called Cassius Parmensis (<emph>i.e.</emph> Cassius of
Parma) by Suetonius (<title>Aug.</title> 4). He was one of the assassins
of Caesar, and, according to Velleius (ii. 87), the last one to
be punished. There is a letter to Cicero (<title>Ad Fam.</title> xii.
13) from <q rend="double">Cassius, Quaestor,</q> dated at the promontory of
Crommyon, Cyprus, June, 710, describing the naval operations of himself
and others in those waters. That this letter was written by Cassius
Parmensis and not by Lucius Cassius, the brother of Gaius, is made
probable by the fact that he was then, as he informs Cicero, cruising in
conjunction with Turulius (mentioned below), and that they joined their
fleets and sailed to the Adriatic about the time that Lucius Cassius was
making his peace with Antony in Asia, as described in Sec. 7. Cassius of
Parma was a poet of distinction. See Horace (<title>Epistles,</title> i.
4. 3).</note> had been left by Cassius and Brutus in Asia with a fleet
and an army to collect money. After the death of Cassius, not anticipating
the like fate of Brutus, he selected thirty ships belonging to the Rhodians,
which he intended to man, and burned the rest, except the sacred one, so
that they might not be able to revolt. Having done this he took his
departure with his own ships and the thirty. Clodius, who had been sent by
Brutus to Rhodes with thirteen ships, found the Rhodians in revolt (for
Brutus also was now dead). Clodius took away the garrison, consisting of
3000 soldiers, and joined Parmesius. They were joined by Turulius, who had a
numerous fleet and a large sum of money which he had previously extorted
from Rhodes.<note resp="translator">This Turulius is
twice mentioned in the letter to Cicero (<title>Ad Fam.</title> xii. 13)
as the quaestor of Tillius Cimber and as the commander of a
fleet in the Mediterranean operating against Dolabella. According to
Valerius Maximus (i. 1. 19) his death was due to an act of impiety in
cutting down for ship-building purposes a grove of trees sacred to
Aesculapius.</note> To this fleet, which was now quite
powerful, flocked those who were rendering service in various parts of Asia,
and they manned the ships with soldiers as well as they could, and with
slaves, prisoners, and inhabitants of the islands where they touched, as
rowers. The son of Cicero joined them, and others of the nobility who had
escaped from Thasos. Thus in a short time there was a considerable gathering
and organization of officers, soldiers, and ships. Having received
additional forces under Lepidus,<note resp="translator">It is not known whether this Lepidus was a relative of the triumvir or
not.</note> who had brought Crete under subjection to Brutus, they made
sail to the Adriatic and united with Murcus and Domitius Ahenobarbus, who
had a large force under their command. Some of these sailed with Murcus to
Sicily to join Sextus Pompeius. The rest remained with Ahenobarbus and
formed a faction by themselves. Such was the first reassembling of what
remained of the war preparations of Cassius and Brutus. </p>
</div><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After the battle of Philippi Octavius and Antony offered a magnificent
sacrifice and awarded praise to their army. In order to provide the rewards
of victory Octavius went to Italy to divide the land among the soldiers and
to settle the colonies. He was chosen for this purpose on account of his
illness. Antony went to the nations beyond the Aegean to collect
the money that had been promised to the soldiers. They divided the provinces
among themselves as before and took those of Lepidus besides. It was
decided, at the instance of Octavius, to make Cisalpine Gaul free,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">Κελτικὴν .
. . αὐτόνομον ἀφιέναι.</foreign> It had been Caesar’s
intention to put Cisalpine Gaul on a footing of equality with the rest
of Italy as to civil and political rights. This intention was now
carried out.</note> as the elder Caesar had intended. Lepidus
had been accused of betraying the affairs of the triumvirate to Pompeius. It
was decided that if Octavius should find that this accusation was false
other provinces should be given to Lepidus. They dismissed from the military
service the soldiers who had served their full time, except 8000 who had
asked to remain. These they took back and divided between themselves and
formed them in praetorian cohorts. There remained to them,
including those who had come over from Brutus, eleven legions of infantry
and 14,000 horse. Of these Antony took, for his foreign expedition, six
legions and 10,000 horse. Octavius had five legions and 4000 horse, but of
these he gave two legions to Antony in exchange for others that Antony had
left in Italy under the command of Calenus. Then Octavius proceeded <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 713</note> toward the
Adriatic. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0041">41</date></note>
</p>
</div><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Antony arrived at Ephesus he offered a splendid sacrifice to the city’s
goddess and pardoned those who, after the disaster to Brutus and Cassius,
had fled to the temple as suppliants, except Petronius, who had been privy
to the murder of Caesar, and Quintus, who had betrayed Dolabella to
Cassius at Laodicea. Having assembled the Greeks and other peoples who
inhabited the Asiatic country around Pergamos, and who were present on a
peace embassy, and others who had been summoned thither, Antony addressed
them as follows: <q rend="double">Your King Attalus, O Greeks, left you to us in his will,
and straightway we proved better to you than Attalus had been, for we
released you from the taxes that you had been paying to him, until the
action of popular agitators among us made these taxes necessary. When they
became necessary we did not impose them upon you according to a fixed
valuation so that we could collect an absolutely certain sum, but we
required you to contribute a portion of your yearly harvest in order that we
might share with you the vicissitudes of the seasons. When the publicans,
who made these collections by the authority of the Senate, wronged you by
demanding more than was due, Gaius Caesar remitted to you one-third
of what you had paid to them and put an end to their outrages; for he even
turned over to you the collection of the taxes from the cultivators of the
soil. And this was the kind of man that our honorable citizens called a
tyrant, and you contributed vast sums of money to the murderers of your
benefactor and against us, who were seeking to avenge him.</q> </p>
</div><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">Now that a just fortune has decided the war, not as you wished, but as was
right, if we were to treat you as allies of our enemies we should be obliged
to punish you. But as we are willing to believe that you were constrained to
this course by necessity, we will release you from the heavier penalty. We
need money and land and cities as rewards for our soldiers. There are
twenty-eight legions of infantry which, with the auxiliaries, amount to
upwards of 170,000 men, besides cavalry and various other arms of the
service. The sum that we need for such a vast number of men you can easily
imagine. Octavius has gone to Italy to provide them with land and cities —
to expropriate Italy, if we must speak plainly. That we may not be under the
necessity of expelling you from your lands, cities, houses, temples, and
tombs, we must count upon getting money from you, not all that you have (we
could not think of that), but a part, a very small part, which, when you
learn it, I think you will cheerfully pay. What you contributed to our
enemies in two years (for you gave them the taxes of ten years in that time)
will be quite sufficient for us; but it must be paid in one year, because we
are pressed by necessity. As you are sensible of our leniency toward you, I
will merely add that the penalty imposed is by no means equal to your
deserts.</q> </p>
</div><div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Antony spoke thus of providing a donative for twenty-eight legions of
infantry, whereas I think that they had forty-three legions when they came
to their agreement at Mutina and made these promises, but the war had
probably reduced them to this number. The Greeks, while he was still
speaking, threw themselves upon the ground, declaring that they had been
subjected to force and violence by Brutus and Cassius, and that they were
deserving of pity, not of punishment; that they would willingly give to
their benefactors, but that they had been stripped by their enemies, to whom
they had delivered not only their money, but, in default of money, their
plate and their ornaments, and who had coined these things into money in
their presence. Finally, they prevailed by their entreaties that the amount
should be reduced to nine years’ taxes, payable in two years. It was ordered
that the kings, princes, and free cities should make additional
contributions according to their means, respectively. </p>
</div><div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While Antony was making the circuit of the provinces Lucius Cassius, the
brother of Gaius, and some others, who feared for their own safety, when
they heard of the pardon of Ephesus, presented themselves to him as
suppliants. He released them all except those who had been privy to the
murder of Caesar. To these alone he was inexorable. He gave relief
to the cities that had suffered most severely. He released the Lycians from
taxes altogether, and urged the rebuilding of Xanthus. He gave to the
Rhodians Andros, Tenos, Naxos, and Myndus,<note resp="translator">Myndus was a town on the coast of Caria. Probably a small
island lying in front of it is here referred to.</note> which were taken
from them not long afterward because they ruled them harshly. He made
Laodicea and Tarsus free cities and released them from taxes entirely, and
those inhabitants of Tarsus who had been sold into slavery he liberated by
an order. To the Athenians when they came to see him he gave Aegina
in exchange for Tenos, and also Icos, Cea, Sciathos, and Peparethos.
Proceeding onward to Phrygia, Mysia, Galatia, Cappadocia, Cilicia,
Cœle-Syria, Palestine, Ituraea, and the other provinces
of Syria, he imposed heavy contributions on all, and acted as arbiter
between kings and cities, — in Cappadocia, for example, between Ariarthes
and Sisinna, awarding the kingdom to Sisinna on account of his mother,
Glaphyra, who appeared to him to be a beautiful woman. In Syria he delivered
the cities from tyrants one after another. </p>
</div><div n="8" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Cleopatra came to meet him in Cilicia, and he blamed her for not sharing
their labors in avenging Caesar. Instead of apologizing she
enumerated to him the things she had done, saying that she had sent the four
legions that had been left with her to Dolabella forthwith, and that she had
another fleet in readiness, but had been prevented from sending it by
adverse winds and by the misfortune of Dolabella, whose defeat came
suddenly; that she did not lend assistance to Cassius, who had threatened
her twice; that while the war was going on she had set sail for the Adriatic
in person with a fleet to assist them, in defiance of Cassius, and
disregarding Murcus, who was lying in wait for her; but that a tempest
shattered the fleet and prostrated herself with illness, for which reason
she was not able to put to sea again till they had already gained their
victory. Antony was amazed at her wit as well as her good looks, and became
her captive as though he were a young man, although he was forty years of
age. It is said that he was always very susceptible in this way, and that he
had been enamoured of her long ago when she was still a girl and he was
serving as master of horse under Gabinius at Alexandria. </p>
</div><div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Straightway Antony’s interest in public affairs began to dwindle. Whatever
Cleopatra ordered was done, regardless of laws, human or divine. While her
sister Arsinoe was a suppliant in the temple of Artemis Leucophryne at
Miletus,<note resp="translator">The temple of
Artemis Leucophryne was at Magnesia, not Miletus. Strabo (xiv. i. 40)
says that, although inferior in size to the temple of Artemis at
Ephesus, it far surpassed the latter in beauty of design. Its remains
were excavated in <date from="1891" to="1893">1891</date>-1893
for the German Archaeological Institute. See note on this
temple in Frazer’s <title>Pausanias,</title> ii. 328.</note> Antony sent
assassins thither and put her to death. Serapion, Cleopatra’s prefect in
Cyprus, who had assisted Cassius and was now a suppliant at Tyre, Antony
ordered the Tyrians to deliver to her. He commanded the Aradians to deliver
up another suppliant who, when Ptolemy, the brother of Cleopatra,
disappeared at the battle with Caesar on the Nile, said that he was
Ptolemy, and whom the Aradians now held. He ordered the priest of Artemis at
Ephesus, whom they called Megabyzus,<note resp="translator">Strabo (xiv. i. 24) tells us that the generic name of the
priests of the temple was <q rend="double">Megalobyzi,</q> that they were eunuchs, that
they were held in high honor, and that they were obliged to have virgins
as their colleagues in the priesthood.</note> and who had once received
Arsinoe as queen, to be brought before him, but in response to the
supplications of the Ephesians, addressed to Cleopatra herself, released
him. So swiftly was Antony transformed, and this passion was the beginning
and the end of evils that befell him. When Cleopatra returned home Antony
sent a cavalry force to Palmyra, situated not far from the Euphrates, to
plunder it, bringing the trifling accusations against its inhabitants, that,
being on the frontier between the Romans and the Parthians, they had avoided
taking sides between them; for, being merchants, they bring the products of
India and Arabia and dispose of them in the Roman territory. In fact,
Antony’s intention was to enrich his horsemen, but the Palmyreans were
forewarned and they transported their property across the river, and,
stationing themselves on the bank, prepared to shoot anybody who should
attack them, for they were expert bowmen. The cavalry found nothing in the
city. They turned around and came back, having met no foe, and empty-handed. </p>
</div><div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>It seems that this course on Antony’s part caused the outbreak of the
Parthian war not long afterward, as many of the rulers expelled from Syria
had taken refuge with the Parthians. Syria, until the reign of Antiochus
Pius and his son, Antiochus, had been ruled by the descendants of Seleucus
Nicator, as I have related in my Syrian history. Pompey added it to the
Roman sway, and Scaurus was appointed praetor over it. After
Scaurus the Senate sent others, including Gabinius, who made war against the
Alexandrians, and after Gabinius, Crassus, who lost his life in the Parthian
war, and after Crassus, Bibulus. At the time of Caesar’s death and
the intestine strife which followed, tyrants got possession of the cities
one by one, and they were assisted by the Parthians, who made an irruption
into Syria after the disaster to Crassus and coöperated with the
tyrants. Antony drove out the latter, who took refuge in Parthia. He then
imposed very heavy tribute on the masses and committed the outrage already
mentioned against the Palmyreans, and did not wait for the disturbed country
to become quiet, but distributed his army in winter quarters in the
provinces, and himself went to Egypt to join Cleopatra. </p>
</div><div n="11" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>She gave him a magnificent reception, and he spent the winter there without
the insignia of his office and with the habit and mode of life of a private
person, either because he was in a foreign jurisdiction, in a city under
royal sway, or because he regarded his wintering as a festal occasion. He
laid aside the cares and duties of a general, and wore the square-cut
garment of the Greeks instead of the costume of his own country, and the
white Attic shoe of the Athenian and Alexandrian priests, which they call
the <foreign xml:lang="lat">phaecasium.</foreign> He went out only to the temples,
the schools, and the discussions of the learned, and spent his time with
Greeks, out of deference to Cleopatra, to whom his sojourn in Alexandria was
wholly devoted. Such was the state of affairs with Antony.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER II</head>
<head>Octavius returns to Rome — Consternation among the Italians —
Confiscation and Division of the Land — Beginning of Trouble with
Lucius Antonius — Outrages committed by the Soldiers — Octavius
powerless to prevent them — The Killing of Nonius — Insubordination
and Desertion, and the Causes thereof</head>
<div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As Octavius was journeying to Rome he became dangerously ill at Brundusium,
and a rumor gained currency that he was dead. On his recovery he returned to
the city and showed to Antony’s friends the letters Antony had written. The
Antonians directed Calenus to give Octavius the two legions, and wrote to
Sextius in Africa to turn that province over to him. This was the course of
the Antonians while, as it appeared that Lepidus had not been guilty of any
serious wrong, Octavius transferred Africa to him in exchange for his former
provinces. He also sold the remainder of the property confiscated under the
conscriptions. The task of assigning the soldiers to their colonies and
dividing the land was one of exceeding difficulty. The soldiers demanded the
cities which had been selected for them before the war as prizes for their
valor. The cities demanded that the whole of Italy should share the burden,
or that the cities should cast lots with the other cities, and that those
who gave the land should be paid the value of it; but there was no money.
They came to Rome in crowds, young and old, women and children, to the forum
and the temples, uttering lamentations, saying that they had done no wrong
for which they, Italians, should be driven from their fields and their
hearthstones, like people conquered in war. The Romans mourned and wept with
them, especially when they reflected that the war had been waged, and the
rewards of victory given, not in behalf of the commonwealth, but against
themselves and for a change of the form of government; that the colonies
were established so that democracy should never again lift its head, —
colonies composed of hirelings settled there by the rulers to be in
readiness for whatever purpose they might be wanted. </p>
</div><div n="13" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius explained to the cities the necessity of the case, but he knew that
it would not satisfy them; and it did not. The soldiers encroached upon
their neighbors in an insolent manner, seizing more than had been given to
them and choosing the best lands; nor did they cease when Octavius rebuked
them and made them numerous other presents. They were contemptuous in the
knowledge that their rulers needed them to confirm their power, for the five
years’ term of the triumvirate was passing away, and army and rulers needed
the services of each other for mutual security. The chiefs depended on the
soldiers for the continuance of their government, while, for the control of
what they had received, the soldiers depended on the permanence of the
government of those who had given it. Believing that they could not keep a
firm hold unless the givers had a strong government,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ὡς γὰρ αὐτῶν οὐ
βεβαίως ἄρχοιεν οἱ δόντες.</foreign> Schweighäuser
detected a lacuna after the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">βεβαίως,</foreign> which he was enabled to fill by comparing the
passage with a similar one in Book I., Sec. 96 <emph>supra,</emph>
viz.: <q rend="double">As they [the soldiers] could not be secure in their own holdings
unless all of Sulla’s affairs were on a firm foundation, they were his
stoutest champions,</q> etc. He accordingly filled the gap with the words
<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπικρατήσοντες εἰ μὴ
βεβαίως.</foreign></note> they fought for them with good-will,
necessarily. Octavius made many other gifts to the indigent soldiers,
borrowing from the temples for that purpose, for which reason the affections
of the army were turned toward him. The greater thanks were bestowed upon
him both as the giver of the land, the cities, the money, and the houses,
and as the object of denunciation on the part of the despoiled, and as one
who bore this contumely for the army’s sake. </p>
</div><div n="14" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Observing this, Lucius Antonius, the brother of Antony, who was then consul,
and Fulvia, the wife of Antony, and Manius, his procurator during his
absence, resorted to artifices to delay the settlement of the colonies till
Antony should return home, in order that it might not seem to be wholly the
work of Octavius, and that he might not reap the thanks alone, and Antony be
bereft of the favor of the soldiers. As this could not be done, on account
of the haste of the soldiers, they asked that Octavius should take the
colony leaders of Antony’s legions from Antony’s own friends, although the
agreement with Antony yielded the selection to Octavius exclusively. They
made it a matter of complaint that Antony was not present.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπιμεμφόμενοι δὲ ὡς οὐ παρόντι τῷ Ἀντωνίῳ</foreign> The
meaning of these words, according to Schweighäuser, is that
Antony’s friends complained that Octavius was forestalling Antony in the
affections of the soldiers during his absence. In his opinion, words
should be inserted after <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὡς</foreign> to express
this idea. Suggestions for filling the gap have been made by both Bekker
and Mendelssohn, but they did not change the text.</note> They brought
Fulvia and Antony’s children before the soldiers, and, in envious terms,
besought them not to forget Antony or allow him to be deprived of the glory
or the gratitude due to his service to them. The fame of Antony was then at
its maximum, not only among the soldiers, but among all others. The victory
of Philippi was considered wholly due to him, on account of Octavius’
illness. Although Octavius was not ignorant that it was a violation of the
agreement, he yielded as a matter of favor to Antony, and appointed friends
of the latter as colony leaders for Antony’s legions. These leaders, in
order that they might appear more favorable to the soldiers than Octavius
was, allowed them to commit still greater outrages. So there was another
multitude from other communities, neighbors of the dispossessed ones,
suffering many injuries at the hands of the soldiers, and crying out against
Octavius, saying that the colonization was worse than the proscription,
since the latter was directed against foes, while the former was against
inoffensive persons. </p>
</div><div n="15" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius knew that these citizens were suffering injustice, but he was
without means to prevent it. There was no money to pay the value of the land
to the cultivators,<note resp="translator">Among the
dispossessed were the poets, Vergil, Horace, Tibullus, and Propertius.
Vergil’s property was seized after the battle of Philippi, but was
restored, as he relates in the first <title>Eclogue.</title> It was
seized a second time after the siege of Perusia, and this time it was
not restored, but he was compensated with land elsewhere. Horace’s
paternal estate was seized after, and in consequence of, the battle of
Philippi, in which he took part on the republican side
(<title>Epistles,</title> ii. 2. 50). It was not restored to him,
but he was compensated for the loss in other ways by the influence of
Maecenas, to whom he was introduced by Vergil and Varius
(<title>Satires,</title> i. 6. 55).</note> nor could the rewards to
the soldiers be postponed, on account of the enemies who were still on foot.
Pompeius ruled the sea and was reducing the city to famine by cutting off
supplies. Ahenobarbus and Murcus were collecting a new fleet and army. The
soldiers would be less zealous in the future if they were not paid for their
former service. It was a matter of much importance that the five years’ term
of office was running out, and that the good-will of the soldiers was needed
to renew it, for which reason he was willing to overlook for the time being
their insolence and arrogance. Once in the theatre when he was present, a
soldier, not finding his own seat, went and took one in the place reserved
for the knights. The people pointed him out and Octavius had him removed.
The soldiers were angry. They gathered around Octavius as he was going away
from the theatre and demanded their comrade, for, as they did not see him,
they thought that he had been put to death. When he was produced before them
they supposed that he had been brought from prison, but he denied that he
had been imprisoned and related what had taken place. They said that he had
been instructed to tell a lie and reproached him for betraying their common
interests. Such was the example of their insolence in the theatre.<note resp="translator">Suetonius (<title>Aug.</title> 14)
relates this incident in the theatre. He says that Octavius narrowly
escaped with his life, and was saved only by the sudden appearance of
the man safe and sound.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="16" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Having been called, about that time, to the Campus Martius for a division of
the land, they came in haste while it was still night, and they grew angry
because Octavius delayed his coming. Nonius, a centurion, chided them with
considerable freedom, urging decent treatment of the commander by the
commanded, and saying that the cause of the delay was Octavius’ illness, not
his disregard of them. They first jeered at him as a sycophant. Then, as the
excitement waxed hot on both sides, they reviled him, threw stones at him,
and pursued him when he fled. Finally he plunged into the river and they
pulled him out and killed him and threw his body into the road where
Octavius was about to pass along. The friends of Octavius advised him not to
go among them, but to keep out of the way of their mad career. But he went
forward, thinking that their madness would be augmented if he did not come.
When he saw the body of Nonius he turned aside. Then, assuming that the
crime had been committed by a few, he chided them and advised them to
exercise forbearance toward each other hereafter, and proceeded to divide
the land. He allowed the meritorious ones to ask for rewards, and he gave to
some who were not meritorious, contrary to their expectation. Finally the
crowd were confounded. They repented and were ashamed of their importunity.
They condemned themselves and asked him to search out and punish the slayers
of Nonius. He replied that he knew them and would punish them only with
their own guilty consciences and the condemnation of their comrades. The
soldiers, thus honored with pardon, rewards, and gifts, changed at once to
joyful acclamations. </p>
</div><div n="17" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Let these two instances serve as examples of the prevailing insubordination.
The cause was that the generals, for the most part, as is usually the case
in civil wars, were not regularly chosen; that their armies were not drawn
from the enrolment according to the custom of the fathers, nor for the
benefit of their country; that they did not serve the public so much as they
did the individuals who brought them together; and that they served these
not by the force of law, but by reason of private promises; not against the
common enemy, but against private foes; not against foreigners, but against
fellow-citizens, their equals in rank. All these things impaired military
discipline, and the soldiers thought that they were not so much serving in
the army as lending assistance, by their own favor and judgment, to leaders
who needed them for their own personal ends. Desertion, which had formerly
been unpardonable, was now rewarded with gifts, and whole armies resorted to
it, including some illustrious men, who did not consider it desertion to
change to a similar cause, for all parties were alike, since neither of them
could be distinguished as battling against the common enemy of the Roman
people. The common pretence of the generals that they were all striving for
the good of the country made desertion easy in the thought that one could
serve his country in any party. Understanding these facts the generals
tolerated this behavior, for they knew that their authority over their
armies depended on donatives rather than on law. Thus, everything was torn
in factions, and the armies indulged in insubordination toward the leaders
of the factions.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER III</head>
<head>Famine in Rome — Lucius Antonius espouses the Cause of the Citizens
against the Triumvirs — An Arbitration between Lucius and Octavius —
The Trouble breaks out afresh — Preparations for War between Lucius and
Octavius — Another Arbitration proposed — The Negotiations fruitless
— Growing Power of Sextus Pompeius — Situation of Affairs in Africa —
Beginning of Hostilities — Octavius seeks Peace — Ineffectual Embassy
to Lucius</head>
<div n="18" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Now famine began to afflict Rome, the supplies by sea being cut off by
Pompeius, and Italian agriculture ruined by the wars. Whatever food was
produced was consumed by the troops. Many robberies were committed by night
in the city. There were acts of violence worse than robbery which went
unpunished, and which were supposed to have been committed by soldiers. The
people closed their shops and drove the magistrates from their places as
though there were no need of courts of justice, or of the useful arts in a
city oppressed by hunger and infested with brigands. </p>
</div><div n="19" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Lucius Antonius, who was a republican and ill affected toward the
triumvirate, which seemed not likely to come to an end at the appointed
time, fell into controversy, and even graver differences, with Octavius. He
alone received kindly, and promised aid to, the agriculturists who had been
deprived of their lands and who were now the suppliants of every man of
importance; and they promised to carry out his orders. Antony’s soldiers,
and Octavius also, blamed him for working against Antony’s interests, and
Fulvia blamed him for stirring up war at an inopportune time, until Manius
maliciously changed her mind by telling her that as long as Italy remained
at peace Antony would stay with Cleopatra, but that if war should break out
there he would come back speedily. Then Fulvia, moved by a woman’s jealousy,
incited Lucius to discord. While Octavius was leading out the last of the
colonies she sent the children of Antony, together with Lucius, to follow
him, so that he should not acquire too great eclat with the army
by being seen alone. A body of Octavius’ cavalry made an expedition to the
coast of Bruttium, which Pompeius was ravaging, and Lucius either thought or
pretended to think that it had been sent against himself and Antony’s
children. Accordingly, he betook himself to the Antonian colonies to collect
a body-guard, and accused Octavius to the soldiers as being treacherous to
Antony. Octavius replied that everything was on a friendly and harmonius
footing between himself and Antony, and that Lucius was trying to stir up a
war between them for another reason, in that he was working against the
triumvirate, by virtue of which the soldiers had a firm hold upon their
colonies, and that the cavalry were now in Bruttium executing the
triumvirate’s orders. </p>
</div><div n="20" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the officers of the army learned these facts, they arbitrated between
Lucius and Octavius at Teanum and brought them to an agreement on the
following terms: That the consuls should exercise their office in the manner
of the fathers and not be hindered by the triumvirs; that the land should be
assigned only to those who fought at Philippi; that of the money derived
from confiscated property, and of the value of that which was still to be
sold, Antony’s soldiers in Italy should have an equal share; that neither
Antony nor Octavius should draw soldiers from Italy by conscription
hereafter; that two of Antony’s legions should serve with Octavius in the
campaign against Pompeius; that the passes of the Alps should be opened to
the forces sent by Octavius into Spain, and that Asinius Pollio should not
further interfere with them; that Lucius should be satisfied with those
conditions, should dispense with his body-guard, and administer his office
fearlessly. Such was the agreement which they made with each other through
the influence of the officers of the army. Of these only the two last were
carried into effect, and Salvidienus crossed the Alps unhindered.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">καὶ
Σαλβιδιηνὸς ἄκων αὐτῷ συμπεριῆλθε τὰς Ἄλπεις.</foreign>
The Latin version of Geslen rendered this passage: <q rend="double">Salvidienus crossed
the Alps in spite of the forces guarding them,</q> which is certainly a
forced interpretation. Schweighäuser pointed out that it was
contrary to the agreement just made, viz., that the passes of the Alps
should be opened to the forces of Octavius. He accordingly considered
the passage corrupt and put a lacuna after the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">αὐτῳ.</foreign> Mendelssohn changes the words
<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἄκων αὐτῷ</foreign> to <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀκολύτως</foreign> (unhindered), a correction which
removes all difficulties.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="21" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As the other conditions were not carried into effect, or were delayed, Lucius
departed to Praeneste, saying that he was in fear of Octavius, who,
by virtue of his office, had a guard, while he (Lucius) was unprotected.
Fulvia went there to meet Lucius, saying now that she had fears for her
children on account of Lepidus. She used him for a pretext this time instead
of Octavius. Both of them wrote these things to Antony, and friends were
sent to him with the letters, who were to give him particulars about each
complaint. Although I have searched, I have not been able to find any clear
account of what Antony wrote in reply. The officers of the armies bound
themselves by an oath to act as umpires again between their magistrates, to
decide what was right, and to coerce whichever should refuse to obey the
decision; and they summoned Lucius and his friends to attend for this
purpose. These refused to come, and Octavius reproached them in invidious
terms to the officers of the army and in the presence of the optimates of
Rome. The latter hastened to Lucius and implored him to have pity on the
city and on Italy, torn by the civil wars, and to accept the arbitration of
themselves, or of the officers, whatever the decision might be.<note resp="translator">According to Dion Cassius (xlviii.
4-10), Fulvia was the life and soul of this uprising. <q rend="double">She girded
herself with a sword, gave the watchwords to the soldiers, and often
harangued them.</q> Velleius (ii. 74) says: <q rend="double">Lucius Antonius, a partaker
of his brother’s vices, but destitute of the virtues that the latter
sometimes showed, by accusing Octavius before the veterans, and by
calling to arms those who had lost their fields in the prescribed
distribution of the lands and the naming of the colonies, had collected
a large army. On the other hand Fulvia, the wife of Antony, who was a
woman in nothing but her form, took part in the contest, and threw
everything into armed strife and tumult. She had first fixed the seat of
war at Praeneste.</q> Plutarch says that when Antony had left
Alexandria to make an expedition against the Parthians, and had gone as
far as Phœnicia, he received dolorous letters from Fulvia,
which caused him to turn about and set sail for Italy with two hundred
ships. <q rend="double">While making the voyage he learned from friends who were fleeing
that Fulvia had been the cause of the war, being by nature restless and
headstrong, and hoping to tear Antony away from Cleopatra by stirring up
commotion in Italy.</q> (<title>Life of Antony,</title> 30.)</note>
</p>
</div><div n="22" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Although Lucius had respect for the speakers and for what they said, Manius
boldly declared that while Antony was doing nothing but collecting money
from foreigners, Octavius was, by his favors, preoccupying the affections of
the army and the desirable places in Italy; that in fraud of Antony he had
freed Cisalpine Gaul, which had previously been given to Antony; that he had
assigned to the soldiers almost the whole of Italy instead of the eighteen
cities; that, instead of the twenty-eight legions that had participated in
the battle, he had admitted thirty-four to a share of the lands and also of
the money from the temples, which he had collected on the pretext of
fighting Pompeius, against whom he had done nothing as yet, although the
city was oppressed by famine; that he had distributed this money in order to
curry favor with the soldiers, to the prejudice of Antony, and that the
property of the proscribed had been not so much sold as given to the
soldiers outright; and, finally, that if he really wanted peace he should
give his reasons for what he had already done, and for the future do only
what should be agreed upon in common. Thus arrogantly did Manius proclaim
his views, implying that Octavius could not do anything by his own authority
and that his agreement with Antony was of no validity, although it provided
that each should have absolute power over the affairs committed to him, and
that each should ratify what was done by the other. When Octavius saw that
they were everywhere preparing for war, he made similar preparations on his
own side. </p>
</div><div n="23" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Two legions of the army which had been colonized at Ancona and which had
served under the elder Caesar and under Antony, hearing of their
respective preparations for war, and being moved by friendship for each of
them, sent ambassadors to Rome to beseech them both to come to an agreement.
Octavius replied that he was not making war against Antony, but that Lucius
was making war against him. The ambassadors then united with the officers of
this army in a common embassy to Lucius asking him to submit his controversy
with Octavius to a tribunal; and they made it plain what they would do if he
should not accept the decision. Lucius and his friends accepted the
proposal, and fixed the place for the trial at Gabii, a city midway between
Rome and Praeneste. A council-chamber was prepared for the
arbiters, and two platforms for the speakers in the centre, as in a regular
trial. Octavius, who arrived first, sent some horsemen along the road by
which Lucius was to come, in order to find out whether any stratagem was
discoverable. These met certain horsemen of Lucius, either his advance guard
or men spying like the others, and as the two parties came into collision
some of them were killed. Lucius retreated, saying that he was afraid of
being entrapped, and, although recalled by the officers of the army, who
promised to escort him, he could not be persuaded to come again. </p>
</div><div n="24" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus the negotiations came to nothing, and Octavius and Lucius resolved upon
war and issued proclamations full of bitterness against each other. The army
of Lucius consisted of six legions of infantry, which he commanded by virtue
of his consulship, and eleven others belonging to Antony, which were under
the command of Calenus. These were all in Italy. Octavius had four legions
at Capua and some praetorian cohorts about his person. Salvidienus
was leading six other legions to Spain.<note resp="translator">The text says <q rend="double"><emph>from</emph> Spain,</q> but this is
obviously a copyist’s error, since we read at the beginning of Sec. 27
that Octavius hastily recalled Salvidienus from his march
<emph>to</emph> Spain.</note> Lucius had supplies of money
from Antony’s provinces where peace prevailed. War was raging in all the
provinces that had fallen to the lot of Octavius except Sardinia, for which
reason he borrowed money from the temples, promising to return it with
thanks — from the Capitoline temple at Rome, from those of Antium, of
Lanuvium, of Nemus, and of Tibur, in which cities there are to-day the most
abundant stores of consecrated money. </p>
</div><div n="25" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The affairs of Octavius were in disorder outside of Italy also. Pompeius, by
reason of the proscription, the colonizing of the soldiers, and the
dissensions with Lucius, had gained much in reputation and power. Those who
feared for their safety, or had been despoiled of their property, or who
utterly abhorred the form of government, mostly went and joined him. Young
men, also, eager for military service for the sake of gain, and who thought
that it made no difference under whom they served, since all service was
Roman service, rather preferred to join Pompeius as representing the better
cause. He had become rich by sea-robbery and had a numerous fleet and a full
complement of men. Murcus joined him with two legions of soldiers, 500
archers, a large sum of money, and eighty ships. He also sent after the
other army<note resp="translator">The remains of the
army of Brutus and Cassius.</note> from Cephalenia. Accordingly, some
persons think that if Pompeius had then invaded Italy, which was afflicted
with famine and civil strife, and was looking for him, he might have
mastered it. But Pompeius lacked wisdom. His idea was not to invade, but
only to defend, and this he did till he failed of that also. </p>
</div><div n="26" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In Africa Sextius, Antony’s lieutenant, had just delivered his army, in
pursuance of an order from Lucius, to Fango, a lieutenant of Octavius. He
was ordered to resume the command, and as Fango would not relinquish it he
collected a force composed of retired veterans, a miscellaneous crowd of
Africans, and auxiliaries of the native princes, and made war on him. Fango,
having been defeated on both wings and having lost his camp, thought that he
had been betrayed, and committed suicide; and Sextius again became master of
the two African provinces. Bocchus, king of Mauritania, at the instance of
Lucius, made war on Carinas, who was Octavius’ procurator in Spain.
Ahenobarbus, who was patrolling the Adriatic with seventy ships, two legions
of soldiers, and a force of archers and slingers, light-armed troops and
gladiators, devastated the regions subject to the triumvirs. He sailed
against Brundusium, captured some of the triremes of Octavius, burned
others, shut the inhabitants up in their walls, and plundered their
territory. </p>
</div><div n="27" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius sent a legion of soldiers to Brundusium and hastily recalled
Salvidienus from his march to Spain. Both Octavius and Lucius sent
recruiting officers through-out Italy, who had skirmishes with each other of
more or less importance, and frequent ambuscades. The good-will of the
Italians was of great service to Lucius, as they believed that he was
fighting for them against the new colonies. Not only the cities that had
been designated for the army, but almost the whole of Italy, rose, fearing
like treatment. They drove out of the towns, or killed, those who were
borrowing money from the temples for Octavius, manned their walls, and
joined Lucius. On the other hand, the colonized soldiers joined Octavius.
Each one in both parties took sides as though this were his own war. </p>
</div><div n="28" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Though these events were taking place, Octavius, nevertheless, convoked the
Senate and the equestrian order and addressed them as follows: <q rend="double">I know very
well that I am accused by Lucius and his friends of weakness and want of
courage because I do not fight them, and that I shall be still further
accused on account of my calling you together. I have strong forces who have
suffered wrong in common with me, both those who have been dispossessed of
their colonies by Lucius and the others whom I have in hand. I am strong in
all respects except only in the purpose to fight. I am not fond of fighting
in civil wars except under dire necessity, or of wasting the remainder of
our citizens in conflicts with each other; least of all in this civil war,
whose horrors will be announced to us not from Macedonia or Thrace, but will
take place in Italy itself, which, if it becomes the field of battle, must
suffer countless evils in addition to the loss of life. For these reasons I
hesitate. And now I protest that I have done Antony no wrong. Nor have I
suffered any wrong from him. I beseech you to reason with Lucius and his
friends on your own account, and to bring them to a reconciliation with me.
If you cannot now persuade them, I shall presently show them that I have
hitherto been moved by good-will, not by cowardice. I ask you to be
witnesses for me not only among yourselves, but also to Antony, and to
sustain me on account of the arrogance of Lucius.</q> </p>
</div><div n="29" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>So spake Octavius. Thereupon some of his hearers went again to
Praeneste. Lucius said to them merely, that both sides had already
begun hostilities, that Octavius was practising deception; for he had lately
sent a legion to Brundusium to prevent Antony from coming home. Manius
showed a letter of Antony’s, either true or fictitious, saying that they
should fight if anybody assailed his dignity. When the senators asked if
anybody had assailed Antony’s dignity, and urged Manius to submit that
question to trial, he indulged in many other quibbles till they went away
without transacting their business. Nor did they collectively bring any
answer to Octavius, either because they had communicated it each for
himself, or because they were ashamed, or for some other reason. The war
broke out and Octavius set forth to take part in it, leaving Lepidus with
two legions to guard Rome. Most of the optimates then showed, by joining
Lucius, that they were not pleased with the rule of the triumvirs. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER IV</head>
<head>War begun — Lucius declares his Intention to restore the Republic —
Lucius seeks to intercept Salvidienus — Is prevented by Agrippa —
Lucius is besieged in Perusia — He there awaits Reënforcements
— His Reënforcements cut off — Lucius makes a Sally, and is
driven back — Lucius’ Lieutenants fail to assist him — Famine in
Perusia — No Food allowed to Slaves — Lucius attempts to break out —
Lucius defeated after desperate Fighting — He begins to entertain
Thoughts of Surrender</head>

<div n="30" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The following were the principal events of the war. A sedition broke out in
two of Lucius’ legions at Alba, which expelled their commanding officers and
started to revolt. Both Octavius and Lucius hastened to them. Lucius arrived
there first and kept them by a large donative and great promises. While
Furnius was bringing a reënforcement to Lucius, Octavius fell upon
his rear guard. Furnius took refuge on a hill and withdrew by night to
Sentia, a city of his own faction. Octavius did not dare to follow by night,
suspecting an ambush, but the next day he laid siege to Sentia and Furnius’
camp together. Lucius, who was hastening toward Rome, sent forward three
cohorts, which effected an entrance into the city clandestinely by night. He
followed with his main army and some cavalry and gladiators. Nonius, who had
charge of the gates, admitted him, and handed over to him the forces under
his own command. Lepidus fled to Octavius. Lucius made a speech to the
citizens, saying that he should visit punishment upon Octavius and Lepidus
for their lawless rule, and that his brother would voluntarily resign his
share of it and accept the consulship, exchanging an unlawful magistracy for
a lawful one, and establishing the government of their fathers in place of a
tyranny. </p>
</div><div n="31" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>All were delighted with this speech, and thought that the government of the
triumvirs was already ended. Lucius was saluted as imperator by the people.
He marched against Octavius, and collected a fresh army from the cities
colonized by Antony’s soldiers, and strengthened their fortifications. These
colonies were well affected toward Antony. Barbatius, a quaestor of
Antony, who had had some difficulty with him and was returning home for that
reason, said, in answer to inquiries, that Antony was displeased with those
who were making war on Octavius to the prejudice of their common sway;
whereupon some, who were not aware of the deception practised by Barbatius,
changed sides from Lucius to Octavius. Lucius put himself in the way of
Salvidienus, who was returning to Octavius with a large army from Gaul.
Asinius and Ventidius, Antony’s generals, were following Salvidienus to
prevent him from advancing. Agrippa, who was the closest friend of Octavius,
fearing lest Salvidienus should be surrounded, seized Sutrium, a stronghold
very useful to Lucius, expecting that Lucius would turn from Salvidienus
against himself, and that Salvidienus, who would then be in the rear of
Lucius, would assist him (Agrippa). It all turned out as Agrippa had
anticipated. So Lucius, having failed of his undertaking, marched to join
Asinius and Ventidius. Salvidienus and Agrippa harassed him on both sides,
watching especially for an opportunity to catch him in the defiles. </p>
</div><div n="32" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Lucius perceived their design he did not dare to come to an engagement
with both of them closing in upon him. So he turned aside to Perusia,<note resp="translator">The modern Perugia.</note> a
strongly fortified city, and encamped near it, to wait there for Ventidius.
Agrippa, Salvidienus, and Octavius advanced against him and against Perusia
and enclosed them with three armies, and Octavius summoned
reënforcements in haste from all directions, as against the vital
point of the war, where he had Lucius surrounded. He sent others forward to
hold in check the forces of Ventidius, who were approaching. The latter,
however, hesitated on their own account to advance, as they did not
altogether approve of the war and did not know what Antony thought about it,
and on account of mutual rivalry were unwilling to yield to each other the
military chieftainship. Lucius did not go out to battle with the forces
surrounding him, because they were better and more numerous and well
drilled, while his were for the most part new levies; nor did he resume his
march, for so many enemies were on his flanks. He sent Manius to Ventidius
and Asinius to hasten them to the <figure>
<head>AGRIPPA</head>
<figDesc>Museum of the Louvre (Duruy)</figDesc>
</figure>
</p>
<p>aid of the besieged, and he sent Tisienus with 4000 horse to pillage the
enemy’s supplies, in order to force him to raise the siege. Lucius entered
within the walls of Perusia so that he might winter in a strong place, if
necessary, until Ventidius and Asinius should arrive. </p>
</div><div n="33" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius, with all haste and with his whole army, drew a line of
circumvallation around Perusia fifty-six stades in circuit, on account of
the hill on which it was situated; he extended long arms to the Tiber, so
that nothing could be introduced into the place. Lucius built a similar line
of countervallation, thus fortifying the foot of the hill. Fulvia urged
Ventidius, Asinius, Ateius, and Calenus to hasten from Gaul to the
assistance of Lucius, and collected reënforcements, which she sent
to Lucius under the lead of Plancus. Plancus destroyed one of Octavius’
legions, which was on the march to Rome. While Asinius and Ventidius were
proceeding, at the instance of Fulvia and Manius, to the relief of Lucius
(but with hesitation and doubt as to Antony’s preference), in order to raise
the blockade, Octavius and Agrippa, leaving a guard at Perusia, threw
themselves in the way. The former, who had not yet formed a junction with
each other and were not proceeding with much alacrity, retreated, — Asinius
to Ravenna and Ventidius to Ariminum. Plancus took refuge in Spoletium.
Octavius stationed a force in front of each, to prevent them from forming a
junction, and returned to Perusia, where he speedily strengthened his
investment of the place and doubled the depth and width of his ditch to the
dimensions of thirty feet each way. He increased the height of his wall and
built 1500 wooden towers on it, sixty feet apart.
He had also strong redoubts and every other kind of intrenchment, with
double front, to besiege those within and to repel assaults from without.
While these works were under construction there were frequent sorties and
fights, in which the forces of Octavius had the advantage in the use of
missiles, and the gladiators of Lucius were better at hand-to-hand fighting.
So these killed many at close quarters. </p>
</div><div n="34" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the work of Octavius was finished famine fastened upon Lucius, and the
evil grew more pressing, since neither he nor the city had made preparations
before-hand.<note resp="translator">Dion Cassius
(xlviii. 14) says that the place had been sufficiently
provisioned.</note> Knowing this fact Octavius kept the most vigilant
watch. On the day preceding the Calends of January, Lucius thought to avail
himself of the holiday, under the belief that the enemy would be off their
guard, to make a sally by night against their gates, hoping to break through
them and bring in his other forces, of which he had abundance in many
places. But the legion that was lying in wait near by, and Octavius himself
with some praetorian cohorts, attacked him, and Lucius, although he
fought valiantly, was driven back. About the same time the mass of the
people in Rome openly denounced the war and the victory, because the grain
was kept under guard for the soldiers. They broke into houses in search of
food, and carried off whatever they could find. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 714</note>
</p>
</div><div n="35" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Ventidius and his friends, ashamed to look on while Lucius was perishing of
hunger, all moved to his support, intending to overpower the forces
surrounding and besieging him. Agrippa and Salvidienus went to meet them
with still larger forces. Fearing lest they should be surrounded, they
diverged to the stronghold of Fulginium,<note resp="translator">The modern Foligno.</note> distant 160 stades from Perusia.
There Agrippa besieged them, and they lighted fires as signals to Lucius.
Ventidius and Asinius were of the opinion that they should go forward and
fight, but Plancus said that, as they were between Octavius and Agrippa,
they had best await events. The opinion of Plancus prevailed. Those in
Perusia were rejoiced when they saw the fires, but when Ventidius delayed
his coming they conjectured that he, too, was in difficulties, and when the
fires ceased they thought that he had been destroyed. Lucius, oppressed by
hunger, again fought a night battle, extending from the first watch till
daylight, around the whole circumvallation; but he failed and was driven
back into Perusia. There he took an account of the remaining provisions, and
forbade the giving of any to the slaves, and prohibited them from escaping,
lest the enemy should gain better knowledge of his desperate situation. The
slaves wandered about in crowds, threw themselves upon the ground in the
city, and between the city and their forts, and ate grass or green leaves
wherever they <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0040">40</date></note> could find them. Those who died Lucius
buried in long trenches, lest, if he burned them, the enemy should discover
what was taking place, and, if they were unburied, disease should result
from the poisonous exhalations. </p>
</div><div n="36" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As no end of the famine, or of the deaths, could be discerned, the soldiers
became restive under the condition of affairs, and implored Lucius to make
another attempt upon the enemy’s works, believing that they could break
through them completely. He approved of their ardor, saying, <q rend="double">In our recent
battle we did not fight in a way corresponding to our present necessity. Now
we must either surrender, or, if that seems worse than death, we must fight
to the death.</q> All assented eagerly, and, in order that no one should have
the night for an excuse, they demanded to be led out by daylight. Lucius
marched out at dawn. He took an abundance of iron tools, for wall fighting,
and ladders of every form. He carried machines for filling the ditches, and
folding towers from which planks could be thrown to the walls; also all
kinds of missiles and stones and wickerwork to be thrown upon the palisades.
They made a violent assault, filled up the ditch, scaled the palisades, and
advanced to the walls, which some of them undermined, while others applied
the ladders, and others simultaneously moved up the towers and defended
themselves with stones, arrows, and leaden balls, with absolute contempt of
death. This was done at many different places, and the enemy being drawn in
many different directions made a more feeble resistance.<note resp="translator">The text here is hopelessly corrupt.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="37" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The planks having been thrown upon the walls at some places, the struggle
became very hazardous, for the forces of Lucius fighting on bridges were
exposed to missiles and javelins on every side. They forced their way,
nevertheless, and a few leaped over the wall. Others followed, and they
would speedily have accomplished something important in their desperation
had not the fact become known to Octavius that they had not many such
machines, and had not the best of his reserves been brought to the
assistance of the tired men. These fresh troops flung the assailants down
from the walls, broke their machines in pieces, and hurled missiles upon
them contemptuously from above. Their enemy, although their shields and
bodies were pierced and even their voices had failed, held their ground
bravely. When the corpses of those who had been killed on the wall were
stripped and thrown down among them, they could not bear the indignity, but
turned away from the spectacle and stood for a moment undecided, like
athletes taking a breathing-spell in the gymnastic games. Lucius had pity on
them in this condition and sounded a retreat. Then the troops of Octavius
joyfully clashed their arms as for a victory, whereupon those of Lucius were
roused to anger and again seized their ladders (although they had no more
towers), and carried them to the walls with desperation. Yet they did not do
any harm to the enemy, for they could not. Lucius ran among them and
besought them to sacrifice their lives no longer, and led them back groaning
and reluctant. </p>
</div><div n="38" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>This was the end of this hotly contested siege. In order that the enemy might
not make another attempt on his works, Octavius stationed a part of his
army, that was held in reserve, alongside the fortifications, and instructed
others in other places to leap upon the wall at the sound of the trumpet.
Although no one urged them on, they went through this exercise continually,
in order to become familiar with it, and to inspire the enemy with fear. The
troops of Lucius began to grow down-hearted, and, as usually happens in such
cases, the guards relaxed their vigilance, and thus desertion became more
frequent, not only of the common soldiers, but, in some cases, of the higher
officers also. And now Lucius inclined toward peace, out of pity for the
perishing multitude, but the fears of some of the enemies of Octavius for
their own safety still restrained him. But as Octavius was observed to treat
the deserters kindly, and the desire for peace increased among all, Lucius
began to fear lest, if he refused, he should be delivered up. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER V</head>
<head>Lucius addresses his Soldiers on the Subject of Surrender — Sends Envoys
to Octavius — Makes a Personal Visit to Octavius — What Lucius said to
him — Lucius surrenders unconditionally — Reply of Octavius — The
Soldiers of the Two Armies embrace each other — Octavius pardons Lucius
and all except a Few Leaders — Perusia destroyed by Fire</head>

<div n="39" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Accordingly, having made a sort of test which gave him encouragement, Lucius
called his army together and spoke as follows: <q rend="double">It was my intention,
fellow-soldiers, to restore the republic to you when I saw that the
government of the triumvirs was a tyranny, which was established, indeed, on
the pretext of combating Brutus and Cassius, but was not relaxed after their
death. Lepidus had been deprived of his share of the government, Antony was
far away collecting money, and this one man was managing everything
according to his own will, and the ancient system of Roman government was
only a pretence and a laughing-stock. With the intention of reverting to the
freedom and democratic government of our ancestors, I asked that after the
rewards of victory had been distributed the monarchy should be dissolved.
When my request was not granted, I sought to enforce it by virtue of my
office. Octavius falsely accused me, before the army, of obstructing the
colonies out of pity for the landowners. I was ignorant of this slander for
a long time, and even when I learned of it I did not suppose that anybody
could believe it, when one saw that the colony officers were men assigned by
my very self to divide the lands among you. But the calumny misled some
people, who joined Octavius in order to make war against us as they think.
But eventually they will find that they have been warring against their own
interests. I affirm that you have chosen the better cause, and that you have
suffered for it beyond your strength. We are vanquished, not by our enemies,
but by hunger, to which we have been left a prey by our own generals.<note resp="translator">Ventidius, Asinius, and
Plancus.</note> It would be becoming in me to fight to the last
extremity for my country. Such an end would make my fame glorious after my
high purposes. To that destiny I do not submit, for the sake of you, whom I
prefer to my own fame. I will send to the conqueror and beg that he will
inflict such punishment as he chooses upon me alone, in place of all of you;
that he will grant amnesty, not to me, but to you, his fellow-citizens and
formerly his soldiers, who are not now in the wrong, who are not fighting
without good cause, and are vanquished, not by war, but by hunger.</q> </p>
</div><div n="40" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After speaking thus he at once selected three men from the optimates for this
mission. The multitude wept, some on their own account, some on account of
their general, who appeared to them to have been actuated by the most
excellent and democratic purpose, and who now yielded to extreme necessity.
The three envoys, when admitted to the presence of Octavius, reminded him
that the soldiers on both sides were all of one race, and that they had made
campaigns together. They called to mind the friendship of the nobility on
either side and also the virtue of their ancestors, who did not allow their
differences to become irreconcilable. They advanced other like arguments
which were calculated to prevail with him. Octavius, knowing that some of
the enemy were still raw recruits, while others were colonized veterans,
replied artfully that he would grant amnesty to Antony’s soldiers out of
regard for him, but that the others must surrender at discretion. This he
said in the presence of all, but, taking aside Furnius, one of the three, he
led him to expect mild treatment for Lucius and the rest, except his own
personal enemies. </p>
</div><div n="41" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>These personal enemies of Octavius, having learned of Furnius’ private
interview and suspecting that it related to themselves, reproached him when
he came back, and demanded of Lucius either that he should ask a new treaty,
which should include all alike, or fight to the death, saying that this had
not been a private war for any individual, but a public one in behalf of the
country. Lucius in pity commended them as men of the same rank as himself,
and said that he would send another embassy. Then he added that no one was
better fitted for this task than himself, and went immediately without a
herald, merely preceded by some persons who went in advance to announce to
Octavius his coming. The latter at once advanced to meet him. There they saw
each other surrounded by their friends and distinguished by the standards
and military equipment of generals on either side. Then Lucius, dismissing
his friends, went forward with two lictors only, showing his state of mind
by his outward appearance. Octavius understood and imitated his example,
showing his intended good-will toward Lucius. When he saw the latter
hastening to pass inside his fortification, indicating thereby that he had
already surrendered, Octavius anticipated him and went outside the
fortification in order that Lucius might still be free to consult and decide
concerning his own interests. Thus as they moved forward they foreshadowed
their intentions to each other in advance, by their retinue and their
outward appearance. </p>
</div><div n="42" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When they came to the ditch they saluted each other, and Lucius said: <q rend="double">If I
were a foreigner waging war against you, Octavius, I should consider it
disgraceful to be vanquished in this way and still more disgraceful to
surrender, and I should have for myself an easy means of deliverance from
such humiliation. Since I have been contending with a countryman, my equal
in rank, in a matter appertaining to our common country, I do not consider
it disgraceful to be beaten in such a cause by such a man. This I say not to
deprecate any suffering that you may choose to inflict upon me (for you see
that I have come to your camp without any guarantee), but to ask for others
such pardon as may be just, and conducive to your own interests. That I may
make this clear to you it is necessary to separate their cause from mine, so
that, when you know that I am the only one to blame, you may visit your
wrath upon me, and not think that I have come here to bandy words (that
would be inopportune), but to tell the truth, for it is not in my power to
speak otherwise.</q> </p>
</div><div n="43" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">I undertook this war against you, not in order to succeed to the leadership
by destroying you, but to restore to the country the patrician government
which had been subverted by the triumvirate, as not even yourself will deny.
For when you created the triumvirate you acknowledged that it was not in
accordance with law, but you established it as something necessary and
temporary because Cassius and Brutus were still alive and you could not be
reconciled to them. When they, who had been the head of the faction, were
dead, and the remainder, if there were any left, were bearing arms, not
against the state, but because they feared you, and moreover the five years’
term was running out, I demanded that the magistracies should be revived in
accordance with the customs of our fathers, not even preferring my brother
to my country, but hoping to persuade him to assent upon his return and
hastening to bring this about during my own term of office. If you had begun
this reform you alone would have reaped the glory. Since I was not able to
persuade you, I thought to march against the city and to use force, being a
citizen, a nobleman, and a consul. These are the causes of the war I waged
and these alone; not my brother, nor Manius, nor Fulvia, nor the
colonization of those who fought at Philippi, nor pity for the cultivators
who were deprived of their holdings, since I myself appointed the leaders of
colonies to my brother’s legions who deprived the cultivators of their
possessions and divided them among the soldiers. Yet you brought this charge
against me before the soldiers, shifting the cause of the war from yourself
to the land distribution, and in this way chiefly you drew them to your side
and overcame me, for they were persuaded that I was warring against them,
and that they were defending themselves against my wrong-doing. You
certainly needed to use artifice in the war you were waging. Now that you
have conquered, if you are the enemy of the country you must consider me
your enemy also, since I wished what I thought was for her advantage, but
was prevented by famine from accomplishing it.</q> </p>
</div><div n="44" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">While I say these things I surrender myself to you, as I have already
declared, to do with me whatever you wish. I came here alone merely to show
what I have thought of you heretofore and what I still think. So much for
myself. Concerning my friends and my whole army, if you will not discredit
my words, I will give you some advice for your own best interests, and that
is, that you inflict no severity upon them on account of the quarrel between
you and me. As you are a mortal and in the hands of fortune, which is always
fickle, do not deter those who might be willing to incur danger for you in
hazardous or trying times hereafter, by teaching them that under your rules
there is no hope of safety except for the victors. Even if all advice from
an enemy is suspected or untrustworthy, I would not hesitate to implore you
not to punish my friends for my fault and my ill fortune, but to put the
whole punishment on me, who am alone to blame. I purposely left my friends
behind so that I might not seem, by using these words in their presence, to
be securing favor for myself in an underhand way.</q> </p>
</div><div n="45" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After Lucius had thus spoken he relapsed into silence, and Octavius said:
 <q rend="double">When I saw you, Lucius, approaching without any guarantee I hastened to
meet you while you were still outside my intrenchments, so that you might
even now be master of your own counsels and be able to say or do whatever
you should think best for your own interests. Since you deliver yourself to
me (as is customary to those who acknowledge that they are in the wrong), it
is not necessary that I should discuss the false accusations that you have
brought against me with so much art. You began by injuring me and you
continue to do so. If you were here negotiating a treaty, you would be
dealing with a victor whom you had wronged. Now that you surrender yourself
and your friends and your army without conditions, you take away not only
all resentment, but also the power which, under negotiations for a treaty,
you would necessarily have given me. There is involved in this question not
only what you and your friends ought to suffer, but what it is becoming in
me, as a just man, to do. I shall make the latter my chief consideration on
account of the gods, on my own account, and on yours, Lucius, and I shall
not disappoint the expectation with which you came to me.</q> These things they
said to each other, as nearly as it is possible to gather the meaning of the
speakers from the Memoirs and translate it into our language.<note resp="translator">Probably the Memoirs here
mentioned are those of Octavius himself, to which reference is made in
<title>Illyr.</title> 14, and in <title>B. C.</title> iv.
110.</note> They then separated, and Octavius eulogized and admired
Lucius because he had said nothing impolite or inconsiderate (as is usual in
adversity), and Lucius praised Octavius for his mildness and brevity of
speech. The others gathered the meaning of what had been said from the
countenances of the speakers. </p>
</div><div n="46" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Lucius sent tribunes to receive the watchword for the army from Octavius.
They took the army roll to him, as it is still customary for the tribune who
asks for the watchword to deliver to the commander the daily register of the
number of troops present. After they had received the watchword they still
kept their outposts on duty, for Octavius himself ordered that each army
should keep its own guard that night. The next morning Octavius offered
sacrifice, and Lucius sent his soldiers to him bearing their arms, but
prepared for marching. They saluted Octavius as imperator while still at
some distance, and each legion took its separate position as Octavius had
directed, the colonized veterans being apart from the new levies. When
Octavius had finished the sacrifice he took his seat in front of the
tribunal, crowned with laurel, the symbol of victory, and ordered them all
to lay down their arms where they stood. When they had done so he ordered
the veterans to draw nearer, intending to reproach them for their
ingratitude and to strike terror into them. It was known beforehand what he
was about to do, and his own army, either purposely (as soldiers are often
advised beforehand), or moved by sympathy as for their own relatives, broke
from the formation in which they had been placed, crowded around Lucius’ men
as they approached their former fellow-soldiers, embraced them, wept with
them, and implored Octavius in their behalf, and ceased not crying out and
embracing them, the new levies sharing in the outburst of feeling, so that
it was impossible to distinguish or discriminate between them. </p>
</div><div n="47" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>For this reason Octavius did not persist in his intention, but, after
appeasing the tumult with difficulty, addressed his own men as follows: <q rend="double">You
have always behaved in such a way to me, fellow-soldiers, that you can ask
nothing from me in vain. I think that the new levies served Lucius under
compulsion. I intended to ask the old soldiers, who have often served with
us and who are now saved from punishment by you, what they have suffered at
our hands, or what favor they have asked in vain, or what greater favors
they expected from anybody else, that they have taken up arms against me,
against you, against them-selves. All the trouble I have met with has grown
out of the division of the lands, in which they had their share. And now if
you will permit me I will ask them these questions.</q> They would not allow
him to do so, but continued their beseeching. <q rend="double">I grant what you wish,</q> he
said. <q rend="double">They are dismissed without punishment for their wrongdoing, provided
they will hereafter be like-minded with you.</q> They promised on both sides
with acclamations and thanks to Octavius, who allowed some of his own men to
entertain some of their men as guests. He ordered the remainder to pitch
their tents where they had been stationed, at a certain distance from the
others, until he should assign them towns for winter quarters and appoint
persons to lead them thither. </p>
</div><div n="48" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Then, seated on his tribunal, Octavius summoned from Perusia Lucius and the
Romans of responsibility who were with him. Many of the senators and knights
came down, all presenting a pitiful appearance by reason of their sudden
change of fortune. As soon as they passed out of Perusia a guard was
stationed around it. When they reached the tribunal Octavius placed Lucius
by his own side. Of the rest, some were taken in charge by the friends of
Octavius, others by centurions, all of whom had been instructed beforehand
to show them honor and to keep watch upon them unobserved. He commanded
those Perusians to come forward who had stretched out their hands to him
from the walls, all except their town council, and as they presented
themselves he pardoned them. The councillors were thrown into prison and
soon afterward put to death, except Lucius Aemilius, who had sat as
a judge at Rome in the trial of the murderers of Caesar, who had
voted openly for condemnation, and had advised all the others to do the same
in order to expiate the guilt. </p>
</div><div n="49" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius intended to turn Perusia itself over to the soldiers for plunder,
but Cestius, one of the citizens, who was somewhat out of his mind, who had
fought in Macedonia and for that reason called himself the Macedonian, set
fire to his house and plunged into the flames. A strong wind fanned the
conflagration and drove it over the whole of Perusia, which was entirely
consumed, except the temple of Vulcan. Such was the end of Perusia, a city
renowned for its antiquity and importance. It is said that it was one of the
first twelve cities built by the Etruscans in Italy in the olden time. For
this reason the worship of Juno prevailed there, as among the Etruscans
generally. But thereafter those who shared among themselves the remains of
the city took Vulcan for their tutelary deity instead of Juno. On the
following day Octavius made peace with all of them, but the soldiers did not
desist from tumults against some of them until the latter were killed. These
were chiefly the personal enemies of Octavius, namely, Canutius, Gaius
Flavius, Clodius Bithynicus, and others. Such was the conclusion of the
siege of Lucius in Perusia, and thus came to an end a war which had promised
to be long-continued and most grievous to Italy.<note resp="translator">Some writers say that 300 persons of the two
orders, chosen from those who had surrendered [at Perusia], were
slaughtered as sacrificial victims on the Ides of March before an altar
erected to Caesar.’ (Suetonius, <title>Aug.</title> 15.)
Velleius (ii. 75) and Dion Cassius (xlviii. 15) relate a circumstance of
a more romantic nature. The former says that the leader of the outbreak
in Campania was Tiberius Claudius Nero. When the revolt was subdued, he
fled with his wife Livia, who carried in her bosom their son, then two
years of age, and all escaped to Sicily. Livia afterwards became the
wife of Octavius, and this infant became the Emperor Tiberius. <q rend="double">Who.</q> 
exclaims the historian, <q rend="double">can sufficiently wonder at the changes of
fortune and at the mutability of human affairs?</q> Tiberius Nero had been
a suitor for the hand of Cicero’s daughter Tullia at the time when
Dolabella obtained it. (<title>Ad Att.</title> vi. 6.)</note></p>
</div></div>
 <div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VI</head>
<head>The Armies of Asinius, Plancus, and Ventidius — Octavius gains
Possession of the Army of Calenus — Antony’s Wife and Mother join him
at Athens — Octavius begins to suspect Antony — He holds a
Conversation on the Subject with Lucius — Antony sets Sail for Italy —
Meets Ahenobarbus in the Adriatic — Antony arrives at Brundusium and
lays Siege to it — Octavius marches thither — Antony sends to
Macedonia to bring his Army — The Soldiers of the Two Armies fraternize
— Death of Fulvia</head>
<div n="50" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Now Asinius, Plancus, Ventidius, Crassus, Ateius, and the others of that
party, who had forces not to be despised, numbering about thirteen legions
of disciplined <figure>
<head>LIVIA AS PRIESTESS OF AUGUSTUS</head>
<figDesc>From Pompeii, in the Museum at Naples</figDesc>
</figure>
</p>
<p>troops and upward of 6500 horse, considering Lucius the chief actor in the
war, retired to the sea-coast by various routes, some to Brundusium, some to
Ravenna, some to Tarentum, some to Murcus and Ahenobarbus, and still others
to Antony. The friends of Octavius followed them, offering terms of peace,
and harassing those who refused, especially the infantry. From among them
only two legions, belonging to Plancus, who were intercepted at Cameria,
were persuaded by Agrippa to desert to him. Fulvia fled with her children to
Dicaearchia,<note resp="translator">The
Greek name of the modern Pozzuoli. It was called Puteoli by the Romans.
(Strabo, V. iv. 6.)</note> and thence to Brundusium, with 3000 horse,
who were sent with her by the generals as an escort. At Brundusium there
were five war-ships which had been sent for from Macedonia, and she embarked
and put to sea, accompanied by Plancus, who abandoned the remains of his
army through cowardice. These soldiers chose Ventidius as their commander.
Asinius drew over Ahenobarbus to the side of Antony. Both Asinius and
Ventidius wrote these facts to Antony, and they prepared landing-places, in
expectation of his early arrival, and stores of provisions throughout Italy. </p>
</div><div n="51" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius was planning to get possession of another considerable army
belonging to Antony, that was under the command of Fufius Calenus near the
Alps. He already had suspicions of Antony, and he hoped, if the latter
remained friendly, to preserve these forces for him, or, if war should break
out, to add this large force to his own strength. While he was still
delaying and looking around for a fair-seeming occasion, Calenus died.
Octavius, believing that he had found a good excuse for both transactions,
went and took possession of the army and of Gaul and Spain besides, which
were Antony’s provinces.<note resp="translator">There is
some confusion here. Spain was not one of Antony’s provinces. It had
been assigned to Lepidus in the original division (iv. 2 <foreign xml:lang="lat">supra</foreign>). It had been taken from him by Antony and
Octavius (v. 3), and the latter administered it by proxy (v. 26).
Lepidus had received Africa in exchange (v. 12). How the discrepancy is
to be explained is not clear. Mendelssohn suggests a lapse of memory on
the part of the author.</note> Fufius, the son of Calenus, was
terrified, and delivered everything over to him without a fight. Octavius,
having acquired eleven legions of soldiers and these large provinces by one
stroke, dismissed the chief officers from their commands, substituted his
own, and returned to Rome. </p>
</div><div n="52" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As it was still winter, Antony retained the deputies of the colonized
veterans, who had been sent to him, and concealed his intentions. In the
spring he set out from Alexandria and proceeded by land to Tyre, and thence
by sea, touching at Cyprus and Rhodes, to the province of Asia. There he
learned of the doings at Perusia and he blamed his brother and Fulvia, and,
most of all, Manius. He found Fulvia at Athens, whither she had fled from
Brundusium. His mother, Julia, who had fled to Pompeius, had been sent
thither by him from Sicily with warships, and escorted by some of the
optimates of his party, by Lucius Libo, his father-in-law, by Saturninus and
others, who, being attracted by Antony’s capacity for great deeds, sought to
bring him into friendly relations with Pompeius and to form an alliance
between them against Octavius. Antony replied that he thanked Pompeius for
sending his mother and that he would requite him for the service in due
time; that if there should be a war with Octavius he would ally himself with
Pompeius, but that if Octavius should adhere to their agreements he would
endeavor to reconcile him with Pompeius. Such was his answer. </p>
</div><div n="53" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Octavius returned from Gaul to Rome he heard about those who had set
sail for Athens. Not knowing exactly what answer Antony had given them, he
began to excite the colonized soldiers against the latter, representing that
Antony intended to bring back Pompeius with the owners of the lands which
the soldiers now held, for most of the owners had taken refuge with
Pompeius. Although this cause of irritation was plausible, the soldiers
would not even then take up arms against Antony with any zeal, the
reputation he had gained at Philippi having made him popular. Octavius
considered himself far superior to Antony, to Pompeius, and to Ahenobarbus
in the number of troops, as he now had more than forty legions, but as he
had no ships and no time to make any, while they had 500, he feared lest
they should bring famine upon Italy by patrolling the coast. While
meditating on those things, and while he had the choice of many virgins in
marriage, he wrote to Maecenas to make an engagement for him with
Scribonia,<note resp="translator">Suetonius says
that Scribonia had already been married twice to men of consular rank,
and had been a mother by one of them. (<title>Aug.</title> 62.)</note>
the sister of Libo, the father-in-law of Pompeius, so that he might have the
means of coming to an arrangement with the latter if need be. When Libo
heard of this he wrote to his family that they should betroth her to
Octavius without delay. Then Octavius, on various pretexts, sent away, to
this place and that, such of Antony’s friends and soldiers as he could not
trust, and he sent Lepidus to Africa, the province assigned to him, and with
him the six of Antony’s legions who were under suspicion. </p>
</div><div n="54" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Then he summoned Lucius to his presence and praised him for his attachment to
his brother, because he had taken the blame upon himself while carrying out
Antony’s wishes, but reproached him with ingratitude if, after meeting such
a favor from himself, he should now refuse to confess concerning the aims of
Antony, who was said to have formed an alliance openly with Pompeius.
 <q rend="double">Having confidence in you,</q> he said, <q rend="double">when Calenus died I took charge of his
provinces and army through my friends for Antony, so that they might not be
without a head, but now that the plot is unveiled I shall keep them all for
myself, and if you wish to go to your brother I will allow you to do so
fearlessly.</q> He spoke thus, either to test Lucius or in order that what he
said might reach Antony. Lucius replied in the same spirit as before,
saying, <q rend="double">I knew that Fulvia was in favor of the monarchy, but I joined with
her and made use of my brother’s soldiers to overthrow all of you. And now
if my brother should come to dissolve the monarchy I would go to join him,
either openly or secretly, and would fight you again in behalf of the
country, although you have been a benefactor to me. If he seeks allies to
assist him in maintaining the tyranny, I will fight on your side against him
as long as I think that you are not trying to establish a monarchy. I shall
always set my country above gratitude and above family.</q> So spake Lucius.
Octavius, holding him in the same admiration as recently [at Perusia], said
that he did not wish to incite him against his brother, but that he would
intrust to Lucius, because he was what he was, the whole of Spain, and the
army in it, which were now under the command of his lieutenants,
Peducaeus and Lucius.<note resp="translator">Section 26 tells us that Spain was under the command of Carinas as the
lieutenant of Octavius. This fact led Freinshem to conjecture that his
name was Lucius Carinas, and that the latter part of the name had in
some way dropped out. Schweighäuser did not fully accept this
explanation, but in his Latin version put Carinas in a parenthesis after
Lucius. Probably an absent-minded copyist, who, from frequent writing of
the word Lucius, had got it fixed in his thoughts, wrote it here where
he should have written Carinas.</note> So Octavius dismissed Lucius with
honor, but kept a secret watch upon him by means of his lieutenants. </p>
</div><div n="55" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Antony left Fulvia ill at Sicyon, and set sail from Corcyra into the
Adriatic<note resp="translator">Sicyon was the chief
town of the small district of Sicyonia in the northeast of the
Peloponnesus. Corcyra was the name of the modern Corfu.</note> with an
inconsiderable army and 200 ships that he had built in Asia. Antony learned
that Ahenobarbus was coming to meet him with a fleet and a large number of
soldiers. Then some of Antony’s friends thought that it was not safe to
trust to the agreement exchanged between them, since Ahenobarbus had been
condemned at the trial of Caesar’s murderers, and had been placed
on the list of the proscribed, and had fought against Antony and Octavius at
the time of the battle of Philippi.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐν Φιλίπποις</foreign>: literally,
at Philippi. Combes-Dounous renders it <q rend="double">At the time of the battle of
Philippi,</q> and this is necessary unless we expunge a considerable part
of Book IV., which narrates the movements of Murcus and Ahenobarbus with
their fleet. Section 115 says that they fought a naval battle in the
Adriatic against Domitius Calvinus on the very day of the first battle
at Philippi.</note> Nevertheless, Antony advanced with five of his best
ships in order to seem to have confidence in Ahenobarbus, and he ordered the
others to follow at a certain distance. When Ahenobarbus was observed coming
forward, rowing swiftly, with his whole army and fleet, Plancus, who was
standing by the side of Antony, was alarmed and advised him to check his
course and send a few men forward to make a test, as to a man whose
intentions were doubtful. Antony replied that he would rather die by a
breach of the treaty than to be saved by an appearance of cowardice, and
continued his course. Now they were drawing near, and the vessels which bore
the chiefs were distinguishable by their ensigns and approached each other.
Antony’s first lictor, who stood on the prow as was customary, either
forgetful that Ahenobarbus was a man of doubtful purpose, and that he was
leading his own forces, or moved by a lofty spirit as though he were meeting
subject or inferior men, ordered them to lower their flag. They did so, and
laid their ship alongside of Antony’s. When the two commanders saw each
other they exchanged greetings, and the army of Ahenobarbus saluted Antony
as imperator. Plancus recovered his courage with difficulty. Antony received
Ahenobarbus in his own ship and sailed to Palœis,<note resp="translator">The best authorities consider this
the town of Valetium, or Baletium, on the coast of Calabria, not far
from Brundusium.</note> where Ahenobarbus had his infantry, and here he
yielded his tent to Antony. </p>
</div><div n="56" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>From thence they sailed to Brundusium, which was garrisoned by five cohorts
of Octavius’ troops. The citizens closed their gates against Ahenobarbus, as
an old enemy, and against Antony, as one introducing an enemy. Antony was
indignant. Considering this a pretence, and that he was in fact shut out by
Octavius’ garrison at the latter’s instance, he drew a ditch and palisade
across the isthmus that connects the town with the mainland. The city is
situated on a peninsula which fronts a crescent-shaped harbor. Now the
people coming from the mainland could no longer reach the rising ground on
which the city stands, as it had been cut off and walled in. Antony also
surrounded the harbor, which is large, and the islands in it, with towers
planted closely together. He sent forces along the coasts of Italy, whom he
ordered to seize the advantageous positions. He called upon Pompeius to move
against Italy with his fleet and to do whatever he could. Pompeius, with
alacrity, despatched Menodorus with a numerous fleet and four legions of
soldiers, who seized Sardinia, which belonged to Octavius, and two legions
in it, who were panic-stricken at this agreement between Pompeius and
Antony. In Italy Antony’s men captured the town of Sipuntum of Ausonia.<note resp="translator">Sipuntum was in Apulia. The word
Ausonia was an old Greek designation applied vaguely to southern
Italy.</note> Pompeius besieged Thurii and Consentia and ravaged their
territory with his cavalry. </p>
</div><div n="57" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius, attacked so suddenly and in so many places, sent Agrippa into
Ausonia to succor the distressed inhabitants. Agrippa called out the
colonized veterans along the road, and they followed at a certain interval,
supposing that they were moving against Pompeius, but when they learned that
what had happened had been done at Antony’s instance, they turned around and
went back secretly. Octavius was greatly alarmed by this. Nevertheless,
while marching to Brundusium with another army he again fell in with the
colonized veterans, and interceded with them, and prevailed upon those who
had been colonized by himself to follow him. They were ashamed to refuse,
but they had the secret intention to bring Antony and Octavius into harmony
with each other, and if Antony should refuse and should go to war, then to
defend Octavius. The latter was detained some days at Canusium by sickness.
Although his forces considerably outnumbered those of Antony, he found
Brundusium walled in, and he could do nothing but encamp alongside of it and
await events. </p>
</div><div n="58" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Antony was enabled by means of his intrenchments to defend himself easily,
although he was much inferior in numbers. He summoned his army from
Macedonia in haste, and in the meantime he resorted to the stratagem of
sending war-ships and merchant vessels to sea by night secretly with a
multitude of private citizens on board, which returned, one after another,
the next day, in sight of Octavius, bearing armed men, as though they had
just come from Macedonia. Antony had his machines already prepared and was
about to attack the Brundusians, to the great chagrin of Octavius, since he
was not able to defend them. Toward evening the news reached both armies
that Agrippa had captured Sipuntum and that Pompeius had been repulsed from
Thurii, but was still besieging Consentia. Antony was disturbed by this
news. When it was announced that Servilius was coming to the assistance of
Octavius with 1500 horse, Antony could not
restrain his rage, but sprang up from supper, and, with such friends as he
could find ready and with 400 horse, he pressed forward with the utmost
intrepidity, and fell upon the 1500, who were
still asleep near the town of Uria, threw them into a panic, captured them
without a fight, and returned to Brundusium the same day. Thus did the
reputation that Antony had gained at Philippi as an invincible man still
inspire terror. </p>
</div><div n="59" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Antony’s praetorian cohorts, proud of his prestige, approached the
camp of Octavius in groups and reproached their former comrades for coming
hither to fight Antony, to whom they all owed their safety at Philippi. When
the latter replied that the others had come making war against themselves,
they fell to arguing and brought charges against each other. Antony’s men
said that Brundusium had been closed against him and that Calenus’ troops
had been taken from him. The others spoke of the investment and siege of
Brundusium, the invasion of Southern Italy, the agreement with Ahenobarbus,
one of Caesar’s murderers, and the treaty with Pompeius, their
common enemy. Finally Octavius’ men revealed their purpose to the others,
saying that they had come with Octavius, not because they were forgetful of
Antony’s merits, but with the intention of bringing them to an agreement,
or, if Antony refused and continued the war, of defending Octavius against
him. These things they openly said also when they approached Antony’s works.
While these events were in progress the news came that Fulvia was dead. It
was said that she was dispirited by Antony’s reproaches and fell sick; and
it was thought that she had become a willing victim of disease on account of
the anger of Antony, who had left her while she was sick and had not visited
her even when he was going away. The death of this turbulent woman, who had
stirred up so disastrous a war on account of her jealousy of Cleopatra,
seemed extremely fortunate to both of the parties who were rid of her.
Nevertheless, Antony was much saddened by this event because he considered
himself in some sense the cause of it. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VII</head>
<head>The Mediation of Lucius Cocceius between Antony and Octavius — Interview
between Cocceius and Octavius — Cocceius argues for Antony’s Rectitude
— Octavius writes to Antony’s Mother — Antony and Octavius reconciled
— They make a New Partition of the World — Antony marries Octavia</head>

<div n="60" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>There was a certain Lucius Cocceius, a friend of both, who had been sent, in
company with Caecina, by Octavius, the previous summer, to Antony
in Phœnicia, and had remained with Antony after Caecina
returned. This Cocceius, seizing his opportunity, pretended that he had been
sent for by Octavius for the purpose of a friendly greeting. When Antony
allowed him to go he asked, by way of testing his disposition, whether
Antony would like to write any letter to Octavius which he could convey.
Antony replied: <q rend="double">What can we write to each other, now that we are enemies,
except mutual recrimination? I wrote letters in reply to his of some time
ago, which I sent by the hand of Caecina. Take copies of those if
you like.</q> This he said by way of jest, but Cocceius would not yet allow him
to call Octavius an enemy after his generous behavior toward Lucius and
Antony’s other friends. But Antony replied: <q rend="double">He has shut me out of
Brundusium and taken my provinces and the army of Calenus from me. He is
kind only to my friends, and evidently not to keep them friendly, but to
make them enemies to me by his benefactions.</q> Cocceius, after hearing these
complaints, did not care to irritate further a naturally passionate
disposition, but proceeded to make his visit to Octavius. </p>
</div><div n="61" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Octavius saw him he expressed astonishment that he had not come sooner.
 <q rend="double">I did not save your brother,</q> he exclaimed, <q rend="double">in order that you should be my
enemy.</q><note resp="translator">Schweighäuser understood the words <q rend="double">your brother</q> to refer to
Lucius Antonius as though Octavius were addressing Cocceius as Antony’s
legate. Mendelssohn shows by a reference to Borghesi that the person
referred to was M. Cocceius Nerva, Antony’s proquaestor.</note>
Cocceius replied, <q rend="double">How is it that you, who make friends out of enemies, call
your friends enemies and take from them their armies and provinces?</q> <q rend="double">It was
not fitting,</q> replied Octavius, <q rend="double">that after the death of Calenus such large
resources should be left in the hands of such a stripling as Calenus’ son
while Antony was still far distant. Lucius was excited to frenzy by them and
Asinius and Ahenobarbus, who were near by, were about to use them against
us. So, too, I took sudden possession of the legions of Plancus, in order
that they might not join the Pompeians. His cavalry have actually gone to
Sicily.</q> <q rend="double">These matters have been told differently,</q> said Cocceius; <q rend="double">but
Antony did not credit the statements made to him until he was shut out of
Brundusium as an enemy.</q> <q rend="double">I gave no order on that subject,</q> replied
Octavius, <q rend="double">nor did I know beforehand that he was coming, nor did I
anticipate that he would come here with enemies. The Brundusians themselves
and the praefect, who had been left with them on account of the
raids of Ahenobarbus, of their own motion excluded Antony, who was in league
with the common enemy, Pompeius, and was bringing in Ahenobarbus, one of my
father’s murderers, who has been condemned by vote of the Senate, by
judgment of the court, and by the proscription, who besieged Brundusium
after the battle of Philippi, and is still blockading the Adriatic coast,
who has burned my ships and plundered Italy.</q> </p>
</div><div n="62" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double">But it was agreed between you,</q> said Cocceius, <q rend="double">that you might treat with
whomsoever you chose. Yet Antony has not made a treaty with any of the
murderers, and he holds your father in no less honor than you do.
Ahenobarbus was not one of the murderers. The vote was cast against him on
account of personal animosity, for he had no share whatever in the plots of
those days.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">οὐδὲ γὰρ τῆς βουλῆς πω τότε μετεῖχεν.</foreign> Casaubon was
of the opinion that this should be rendered: <q rend="double">for he was not then a
member of the Senate.</q> It all depends upon the interpretation of
<foreign xml:lang="grc">τῆς βουλῆς,</foreign> and it must be said
that Appian does not generally use <foreign xml:lang="grc">βουλή</foreign> for plot, or conspiracy, but does almost
invariably use it for the Senate. Suetonius (<title>Nero,</title> 3)
says that this Domitius Ahenobarbus, although condemned by the Pedian
Law, among those who were privy to the murder of Caesar, was
innocent of that crime.</note> If we consider him unpardonable because
he was a friend of Brutus, are we not in a fair way to be bitter against
almost everybody? Antony made an agreement with Pompeius, not to make an
aggressive war with him, but either to secure his help in case of an attack
by you, or to bring him into good relations with you, since he has done
nothing which should make him irreconcilable. You are the one to blame for
these things, for if there had been no war in Italy those men would not have
ventured to send ambassadors to Antony.</q> Octavius repeated his accusations,
saying, <q rend="double">Manius and Fulvia and Lucius brought war against Italy, and
against me as well as Italy; and Pompeius, who did not attack before, now
makes descents upon the coast, encouraged by Antony.</q> Cocceius replied, <q rend="double">Not
encouraged by Antony, but directed by him; for I will not conceal from you
the fact that the rest of Italy, which is destitute of naval defences, will
be attacked by a powerful fleet unless you agree to peace.</q> Octavius, who
gave due weight to this artful suggestion, reflected a moment, and then
said, <q rend="double">But Pompeius will have the worst of it. He has just been repulsed
from Thurii as he deserves.</q> Then Cocceius, having gone over the whole
controversy, led the conversation up to the death of Fulvia and the manner
of it, saying that she fell sick because she could not bear the anger of
Antony and wasted away with grief because he would not see her when she was
ill, and that he was in a manner the cause of his wife’s death. <q rend="double">Now that
she is dead,</q> he continued, <q rend="double">it only remains for you to tell each other
frankly what your suspicions are.</q> </p>
</div><div n="63" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In this way Cocceius won the confidence of Octavius and passed the day as his
guest, and begged him to write to Antony as the younger man to the older.
Octavius said that he would not write to one who was still waging war
against him, because Antony had not written to him, but that he would make
complaint to Antony’s mother, because, although a relative and held in the
highest honor by Octavius,<note resp="translator">Plutarch informs us that Antony’s mother, Julia, was of the family of
the Caesars and the equal in virtue and amiability of the most
exemplary women of her time. (<title>Life of Antony,</title> 2.) Her
father, Lucius Caesar, had been consul in the year 664 and her
brother of the same name had held that office in 690.</note> she had
fled from Italy, as though she could not have obtained everything from him
as from her own son. This was his artful way of opening a correspondence <figure>
<head>OCTAVIA</head>
<figDesc>Cameo owned by M. le Baron Roger (Duruy)</figDesc>
</figure>
</p>
<p>by writing to Julia. As Cocceius was going away from the camp many of the
higher officers advised him of the purpose of the army, and he communicated
this and other things he had learned to Antony, so that he might know that
they would fight against him because he did not come to an agreement. So he
advised Antony that Pompeius should be called back from his ravaging to
Sicily, and that Ahenobarbus should be sent somewhither until a treaty of
peace should be made. Antony’s mother besought him to the same purpose, for
she belonged to the Julian <foreign xml:lang="lat">gens.</foreign> Antony apprehended that
if the negotiations should fail he would be put to the shame of calling on
Pompeius for assistance again, but his mother encouraged him to believe that
they would not fail, and Cocceius confirmed her, intimating that he knew
more than he had told. So Antony yielded, and ordered Pompeius back to
Sicily, implying that he would take care of their mutual concerns, and sent
Ahenobarbus away as governor of Bithynia. </p>
</div><div n="64" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Octavius’ soldiers learned these facts they chose deputies and sent the
same ones to both commanders. They took no notice of accusations because
they had been chosen, not to decide a controve sy, but to restore peace.
Cocceius was added to their number as she common friend of both, together
with Pollio from Antony’s party and Maecenas from that of
Octavius. It was determined that there should be amnesty between Antony and
Octavius for the past and friendship for the future. Moreover, as Marcellus,
the husband of Octavius’ sister Octavia, had recently died, the umpires
decided that her brother should betroth her to Antony, which he did
immediately. Then Antony and Octavius embraced each other. Thereupon shouts
went up from the soldiers and congratulations were offered to each of the
generals, without intermission, through the entire day and night. </p>
</div><div n="65" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Now Octavius and Antony made a fresh partition of the whole Roman empire
between themselves, the boundary line being Scodra, a city of Illyria which
was supposed to be situated about midway up the Adriatic gulf.<note resp="translator">So that a line drawn through it
from east to west would divide the Adriatic into two equal parts.</note>
All provinces aid islands east of this place, as far as the river Euphrates,
were to belong to Antony and all west of it to the ocean to Octavius.
Lepidus was to govern Africa, as Octavius had given it to him. Octavius was
to make war against Pompeius unless they should come to some agreement, and
Antony was to make war against the Parthians to avenge their treachery
toward Crassus. Octavius was to make the same agreement with Ahenobarbus
that Antony had already made. Both of them might freely enlist soldiers in
Italy in equal numbers. These were the last conditions of peace between
Octavius and Antony. Straightway each of them sent his friends to attend to
urgent business. Antony despatched Ventidius to Asia against the Parthians
and against Labienus, the son of Labienus, who, with the Parthians, had made
a hostile incursion into Syria and had advanced as far as Ionia during the
late troubles.<note resp="translator">Dion Cassius
(xlviii, 24) says that this Labienus, the son of Caesar’s
lieutenant in the Gallic war, <q rend="double">while serving in the army with Brutus
and Cassius was sent to Orodes, the king of the Parthians, before the
battle of Philippi, to solicit aid. He was treated disdainfully and kept
waiting a long time by this prince, who hesitated to comply, yet feared
to refuse. When the news came that Brutus and Cassius were defeated and
that the victors were not likely to spare any of their antagonists, he
remained with the barbarians, preferring life with them to death at
home. This Labienus, when he heard of Antony’s indolence, of his passion
for Cleopatra, and his departure for Egypt, persuaded the Parthians to
attack the Romans.</q> They were soon afterward crushed by
Ventidius.</note> What Labienus and the Parthians did and suffered I
will show in my Parthian history. </p>
</div><div n="66" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In the meantime Helenus, a lieutenant of Octavius, who had repossessed
Sardinia by a sudden onset, was driven out again by Menodorus, the
lieutenant of Pompeius. Octavius was so exasperated by this that he rejected
Antony’s endeavors to bring him to an agreement with Pompeius. They
proceeded to Rome together and celebrated the marriage. Antony put Manius to
death because he had excited Fulvia by his accusations against Cleopatra and
had been the cause of so many evils. He also revealed to Octavius the fact
that Salvidienus, who was in command of Octavius’ army on the Rhone, had had
the intention of deserting him, and had sent word to that effect to Antony
while he was besieging Brundusium. This secret Antony revealed, not with
universal approbation, but because of his frankness and eagerness to show
his good-will. Octavius instantly summoned Salvidienus to Rome, pretending
that he had some private communication to make to him, and that he should
send him back to the army. When he came Octavius confronted him with proofs
of his treachery and put him to death, and gave his army to Antony, as he
considered it untrustworthy.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="8" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER VIII</head>
<head>Sextus Pompeius cuts off the Supply of Corn — Famine in Rome — Riot in
the Forum — Octavius is stoned by the Mob and rescued by Antony —
Negotiations with Sextus Pompeius — Sextus puts Murcus to Death —
Sextus goes to Puteoli, and has a Conference with Antony and Octavius —
They come to an Agreement — Banquets on Shipboard and on Shore — Great
Rejoicing at Rome — Antony returns to the East — Spends the Winter in
Athens</head>
<div n="67" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Now famine fell upon Rome, since the merchants of the Orient could not put to
sea for fear of Pompeius, who controlled Sicily, and those of the west were
deterred by Sardinia and Corsica, which the lieutenants of Pompeius held,
while those of Africa opposite were prevented by the same hostile fleets,
which infested both shores. There was great dearness of provisions, and the
people considered the cause of it to be the strife between the chiefs, and
cried out against them and urged them to make peace with Pompeius. As
Octavius would by no means yield, Antony advised him to hasten the war on
account of the scarcity. As there was no money for this purpose, an edict
was published that the owners of slaves should pay a tax for each one, equal
to one-half of the twenty-five drachmas that had been ordained for the war
against Brutus and Cassius, and that those who acquired property by legacies
should contribute a share thereof. The people tore down the edict with fury.
They were exasperated that, after exhausting the public treasury, stripping
the provinces, burdening Italy itself with contributions, taxes, and
confiscations, not for foreign war, not for extending the empire, but for
private enmities and to add to their own power (for which reason the
proscriptions and this terrible famine had come about), the triumvirs should
deprive them of the remainder of their property. They banded together, with
loud cries, and stoned those who did not join them, and threatened to
plunder and burn their houses, until the whole populace was aroused. </p>
</div><div n="68" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius with his friends and a few attendants came into the forum intending
to intercede with the people and to show the unreasonableness of their
complaints. As soon as he made his appearance they stoned him unmercifully,
and they were not ashamed when they saw him enduring this treatment
patiently, and offering himself to it, and even bleeding from wounds. When
Antony learned what was going on he came with haste to his assistance. When
the people saw him coming down the Via Sacra they did not throw stones at
him, since he was in favor of a treaty with Pompeius, but they told him to
go away. When he refused to do so they stoned him also. He called in a
larger force of troops, who were outside the walls. As the people would not
allow him to pass through, the soldiers divided right and left on either
side of the street and the forum, and made their attack from the narrow
lane, striking down those whom they met. The people could no longer find
ready escape on account of the crowd, nor was there any way out of the
forum. There was a scene of slaughter and wounds, while shrieks and groans
sounded from the housetops. Antony made his way into the forum with
difficulty, and snatched Octavius from the most manifest danger, in which he
then was, and brought him safe to his house.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">καὶ τοῦ κινδύνου τὸν Καίσαρα
  περιφανῶς δὴ τότε μάλιστα οὗτος ἐξείελτο καὶ ἐς τὴν
οἰκίαν περιέσωσεν</foreign>: possibly the words <foreign xml:lang="grc">οὗτος</foreign> (<emph>this man</emph>) and
<foreign xml:lang="grc">τότε</foreign> (<emph>then</emph>) are
intended to emphasize the contrast between the present relations of
Antony and Octavius, and what transpired later.</note> The mob having
been dispersed, the corpses were thrown into the river in order to avoid a
shocking spectacle. It was a fresh cause of lamentation to see them floating
down the stream, and the soldiers stripping them, and certain miscreants, as
well as the soldiers, carrying off the clothing of the better class as their
own property. This insurrection was suppressed, but with terror and hatred
for the triumvirs. The famine grew worse. The people groaned, but did not
stir. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 715</note>
</p>
</div><div n="69" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Antony suggested to the relatives of Libo that they <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0039">39</date></note> should
summon him from Sicily for the purpose of congratulating his
brother-in-law,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπὶ συνησθήσει τοῦ κήδους;</foreign> Musgrave
suggested <foreign xml:lang="grc">συνθέσει.</foreign> (<emph>an
agreement</emph>) instead of <foreign xml:lang="grc">συνησθήσει</foreign> (<emph>congratulation</emph>), and
Mendelssohn concurs, but does not change the text.</note> and to
accomplish something more important; and he promised him a safe-conduct. His
relatives wrote promptly and Pompeius acquiesced. Libo, on his arrival, cast
anchor at the isle of Pithecusa, which is now called Aenaria.<note resp="translator">The modern Ischia.</note> When the
people learned this, they assembled together again and besought Octavius
with tears to send letters of safeguard to Libo, who desired to negotiate
with him for peace. He did so reluctantly. The people also threatened to
burn Mucia, the mother of Pompeius, with her house, if she did not
communicate with her son in the interest of peace. When Libo perceived that
his enemies were on the point of yielding, he demanded that the leaders
themselves should come together in order to make such concessions to each
other as they could agree upon. The people compelled them to this course,
and, accordingly, Octavius and Antony went to Baiae. </p>
</div><div n="70" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>All the friends of Pompeius urged him with one accord to make peace, except
Menodorus, who wrote to him from Sardinia either to prosecute the war
vigorously or still to procrastinate, because famine was fighting for them,
and he would thus get better terms if he should decide to make peace.
Menodorus also advised him to distrust Murcus, who opposed these views,
intimating that he was seeking power for himself. Pompeius, who had been
vexed with Murcus lately on account of his high position and his
stubbornness, became still more averse to him for this reason, and held no
communication with him whatever, until, finally, Murcus retired in disgust
to Syracuse. Here he saw some of Pompeius’ guards following him, and he
expressed his opinion of Pompeius to them freely. Then Pompeius bribed a
tribune and a centurion of Murcus, and induced them to kill him and to say
that he had been murdered by slaves. To give credibility to this falsehood
he crucified the slaves. But he did not succeed in concealing this crime, —
the next one committed by him after the murder of Bithynicus, — Murcus
having been a man distinguished for his warlike deeds, who had been strongly
attached to that party from the beginning, and had rendered great assistance
to Pompeius in Spain, and had joined him in Sicily voluntarily. Such was the
death of Murcus. </p>
</div><div n="71" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>His other friends urged Pompeius to make peace, and they accused Menodorus of
fondness of power and as opposing peace not so much from good-will to his
master<note resp="translator">Menodorus was a
freedman. He had been a slave of Pompey the Great. See Sec. 79
<emph>infra.</emph> Dion Cassius, Plutarch, and Velleius give
him the name of Menas.</note> as from a desire to command an army and a
province. Pompeius yielded and set sail for Aenaria with a large
number of his best ships, having embarked himself on a magnificent one with
six banks of oars. In this style, toward evening, he sailed proudly past
Puteoli in sight of his enemies. Early in the morning two sets of piles were
driven in the sea a short distance apart, and planks were placed upon them.
Upon the platform nearest the shore Octavius and Antony took their places,
while Pompeius and Libo occupied the seaward one, a small space of water
separating them, but not preventing them from hearing each other without
shouting. As Pompeius thought that he had come in order to be admitted to a
share of the government in place of Lepidus, while the others would concede
nothing but his recall from exile, they separated for the time without
accomplishing anything. Nevertheless, negotiations were continued on the
part of friends, who advanced various proposals from one side to the other.
Pompeius demanded that, of the proscripts and the men with him, those who
had participated in the murder of Gaius Caesar should be allowed a
safe place of exile, and the rest an honorable recall to their homes, and
that the property they had lost should be restored to them. Urged on by the
famine and by the people to an agreement, Octavius and Antony reluctantly
conceded a fourth part of this property, promising to buy it from the
present holders. They wrote to this effect to the proscripts themselves,
hoping that this would satisfy them. The latter accepted all the terms, for
they already had apprehensions of Pompeius on account of his crime against
Murcus. So they gathered around Pompeius and besought him to come to an
agreement. Pompeius rent his garments, declaring that he had been betrayed
by those for whom he had fought, and he frequently invoked the name of
Menodorus as his most competent officer and his only friend. </p>
</div><div n="72" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Finally, at the instance of his mother, Mucia, and of his wife, Julia, again
the three men (Octavius, Antony, and Pompeius) came together on the mole of
Puteoli, washed by the waves on both sides, and with ships moored around it
as guards. Here they came to an agreement on the following terms: That the
war should cease on both land and sea, and that commerce should be
everywhere unmolested; that Pompeius should remove his garrisons from Italy
and no longer afford a refuge to fugitive slaves; that he should not assail
with his fleet the Italian coast, but should govern Sardinia, Sicily, and
Corsica, and any other islands then in his possession, as long as Antony and
Octavius should hold sway over the other countries; that he should send to
Rome the corn that had been previously required as tribute from those
islands, and that he might have Peloponnesus in addition; that he might hold
the consulship in his absence through any friend he might choose, and be
inscribed as a member of the priesthood of the first rank. Such were the
conditions accorded to Pompeius himself. Members of the nobility who were
still in exile were allowed to return, except those who had been condemned
by vote of the Senate and judgment of court for participation in the murder
of Gaius Caesar. The property of those who had fled merely from
fear, and whose goods had been seized by violence, should all be restored
except movables. Proscripts should receive one fourth part of theirs. Slaves
who had served in the army of Pompeius should be free, and free persons who
had thus served should, upon their discharge, receive the same rewards as
those who had served under Octavius and Antony. </p>
</div><div n="73" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Such were the terms of the treaty, to which they attached their names and
seals and sent it to Rome to be placed in the custody of the Vestal virgins.
Then they entertained each other, casting lots to determine the order of the
ceremony. The first banquet took place on Pompeius’ six-banked ship, moored
alongside the mole. On succeeding days Antony and Octavius gave banquets in
tents pitched on the mole, on the pretext that thus all might participate,
but perhaps really for their better security and to quiet apprehensions; for
they did not even then neglect precautions. Their ships were moored
alongside and guards were stationed around them, and the banqueters were
girded with concealed daggers. It is said that, while the three were
feasting in the ship, Menodorus sent a message to Pompeius advising him to
entrap these men and avenge the wrongs of his father and his brother, and to
avail himself of this most favorable occasion to resume the sway that his
father had exercised, saying that he, with his own ships, would take care
that nobody should escape; but that Pompeius replied, in a manner worthy of
his family and his position, <q rend="double">Would that Menodorus had done this without my
knowledge. False swearing may become Menodorus, but not Pompeius.</q><note resp="translator">Plutarch relates this tale in
nearly the same language. He says that <q rend="double">while the banquet was at its
height, and they were cracking jokes about Cleopatra and Antony, Menas
the pirate approached Pompeius, and whispered to him so that the others
could not hear: <q rend="single">Do you wish me to cut loose from the ship’s anchors and
make you master, not of Sicily and Sardinia only, but of the whole Roman
empire?</q> Pompeius, after hearing him, waited a brief space, and said: 
<q rend="single">O Menas, you might have done so without telling me beforehand! Now we
must be satisfied with present conditions, for I cannot break my oath.</q></q> 
(<title>Life of Antony,</title> 32.)</note> At this banquet the
daughter of Pompeius and granddaughter of Libo was betrothed to Marcellus,
the stepson of Antony and nephew of Octavius. On the following day they
designated the consuls for the next four years, viz., for the first year
Antony and Libo, Antony being privileged to substitute whomsoever he liked
in his own place; next Octavius and Pompeius; next Ahenobarbus and Sossius;
and, finally, Antony and Octavius again; and as they would then have been
consuls the third time it was expected that they would restore the
government to the people. </p>
</div><div n="74" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Having finished this business they separated, Pompeius <figure>
<head>SEXTUS POMPEIUS</head>
<figDesc>Museum of the Louvre (Duruy)</figDesc>
</figure>
</p>
<p>going to Sicily by sea, Octavius and Antony to Rome by land. When the Romans
and Italians learned the news 3 there was universal rejoicing at the return
of peace and at their deliverance from intestine war, from the conscription
of their sons, from the arrogance of guards, from the running away of
slaves, from the pillage of fields, from the ruin of agriculture, and, above
all, from the famine that had pressed upon them with the greatest severity.
As the triumvirs were proceeding on their journey sacrifices were offered in
their honor as to saviours. The city would have given them a magnificent
reception, had they not entered secretly by night in order to avoid
jealousies. The only ones disappointed were those to whom had been allotted
lands belonging to men who were to be restored with Pompeius. They thought
that they should have irreconcilable enemies dwelling alongside of them as
landlords, who would do them injury whenever they could. The exiles who were
with Pompeius, all but a few, took leave of him at Puteoli and set sail for
Rome. Their coming was to the people a new source of joy and acclamations,
so great a number of illustrious men having been unexpectedly saved from
death. </p>
</div><div n="75" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After these events Octavius set forth on an expedition to Gaul, which was in
a disturbed state, and Antony started for the war against the Parthians. The
Senate having voted to ratify all that he had done or should do, Antony
again despatched his lieutenants in all directions and arranged everything
else as he wished. He set up kings here and there as he pleased, on
condition of their paying a prescribed tribute: in Pontus, Darius, the son
of Pharnaces and grandson of Mithridates; in Idumea and Samaria, Herod; in
Pisidia, Amyntas; in a part of Cilicia, Polemon, and others in other
countries. Desiring to enrich as well as to exercise the soldiers, who were
to go with him into winter quarters, he sent some of them against the
Partheni, an Illyrian tribe near Epidamnus, who had been very much attached
to Brutus; others against the Dardani, another Illyrian tribe, who were
forever making.incursions into Macedonia. Others he ordered to remain in
Epirus, in order to have them all within reach, as he intended to pass the
winter himself in Athens. He sent Furnius to Africa to bring four legions,
that were under the command of Sestius, for service against the Parthians.
He did not know as yet that Lepidus had deprived Sestius of the command of
these troops. </p>
</div><div n="76" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Having made these dispositions, he spent the winter at Athens with Octavia
just as he had spent the previous one at Alexandria with Cleopatra, merely
looking over the reports sent from the army, exchanging the display of a
commander for the simplicity of private life, wearing the square-cut pallium
and the Attic shoe, and without formal company. He went out, in like manner,
without the insignia of office, accompanied by two friends and two
attendants, to the discussions and lectures of the public teachers. He took
his meals in the Greek fashion, passed his leisure time with Greeks, and
enjoyed their festivals in company with Octavia, with whom he was very much
in love, being <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 716</note>
by nature excessively fond of women. At the end of the <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0038">38</date></note> winter he
was like another man. He changed his clothing, and with his clothing his
whole appearance. There was straightway a crowd around his doors composed of
lictors, army officers, guards, and all things that inspire terror and awe.
Embassies were received which had previously been kept waiting by his
orders, lawsuits were decided, ships were launched, and all other
preparations for the campaign were put in motion.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER IX</head>
<head>Peace broken between Sextus and Octavius — Antony returns to Brundusium
— Defection of Menodorus — He delivers Sardinia and Corsica to
Octavius — Octavius makes war against Sextus — Sea-Fight at
Cumae between Menodorus and Menecrates — Menodorus wounded and
Menecrates killed — The Fleet of Octavius worsted — A Second Victory
for Pompeius — Octavius driven ashore and retreats to the Mountains</head>
<div n="77" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While Antony was thus occupied the treaty existing beween Octavius and
Pompeius was broken for other reasons, as was suspected, than those avowed
by Octavius, which were the following: Antony had ceded Peloponnesus to
Pompeius on condition that the tribute then due from the Peloponnesians
should either be given over at once, or that it should be guaranteed by
Pompeius to Antony, or that the former should wait till the collection had
been made. Pompeius had not accepted it on these conditions. He thought that
it had been given to him with the amount of tribute then due. Vexed, as
Octavius said, whether at this state of things, or from his general
faithlessness, or his jealousy because the others had large armies, or
because Menodorus had prompted him to consider the agreement as a truce
rather than a lasting peace, he began to build ships, and recruit crews, and
once harangued his soldiers, telling them they must be prepared for
everything. Private robbery again infested the sea, and there was little or
no relief from the famine among the Romans, who cried out that the treaty
had brought no deliverance from their sufferings, but only a fourth partner
to the tyranny. Octavius having caught certain pirates and put them to
torture, they said that Pompeius had sent them out, and Octavius proclaimed
this to the people and wrote it to Pompeius himself, who disavowed it and
made a counter complaint respecting the Peloponnesus. </p>
</div><div n="78" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Those of the nobility who were still with Pompeius, seeing him always under
the influence of his freedmen, bribed some of them, either for their own
purposes or to gratify Octavius, to incite their master against Menodorus,
who was still governing Corsica and Sardinia.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐξοτρύνειν ἐπὶ Μηνοδώρῳ
Κύρνου καὶ Σαρδοῦς ἔτι ἄρχοντι, τὸν δεσπότην.</foreign>
All the codices except one omit the words <foreign xml:lang="grc">Κύρνου
καὶ Σαρδοῦς,</foreign> leaving the passage hopeless. Mendelssohn
was so fortunate as to find the true reading in the Vatican MS.</note>
The freedmen did this gladly, because they were envious of the power of
Menodorus. In this way Pompeius was brought to an estrangement with
Menodorus. About the same time Philadelphus, a freedman of Octavius, made a
voyage to Menodorus to procure corn, and Micylio, the closest friend of
Menodorus, visited Octavius to arrange for the desertion of Menodorus. The
latter promised to hand over to him Sardinia, Corsica, three legions of
soldiers, and a large number of light-armed troops. Whether this was the
work of Philadelphus, or was a consequence of the calumnies against
Menodorus, which Pompeius had listened to, Octavius accepted the offer, not
immediately, but soon, since he considered the peace broken in fact. He
invited Antony to come from Athens and meet him at Brundusium on an
appointed day, in order to take counsel with him about the war. At the same
time he brought war-ships from Ravenna and an army from Gaul, and the
remainder of his apparatus, rapidly to Brundusium and Puteoli, intending to
sail from both sides of Italy to Sicily if Antony should agree in opinion
with him. </p>
</div><div n="79" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Antony came at the appointed day with a small escort, but not finding
Octavius there he did not wait, either because he did not approve of the
war, considering it a violation of the treaty, or because he observed
Octavius’ great preparations (for the desire to be the sole ruler did not
permit their fears to slumber at any time), or because he was alarmed by a
prodigy. It was found that one of the guards who slept around his tent had
been devoured by wild beasts except his face only, as though this had been
left for the purpose of recognition, and that he had uttered no cry, nor did
any of those who were asleep with him know of it. The Brundusians said that
a wolf had been seen just before daybreak running away from the tents.
Nevertheless Antony wrote to Octavius not to violate the treaty, and he
threatened Menodorus with punishment as his own fugitive slave; for the
latter had been the slave of Pompey the Great, whose property Antony had
bought when it was sold under the law of war. </p>
</div><div n="80" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius sent officers to receive Sardinia and Corsica, which Menodorus
turned over to them. He strengthened the Italian coast with numerous towers
to prevent Pompeius from raiding it again. He ordered the building of new
triremes at Rome and Ravenna, and he sent for a large army from Illyria.
When Menodorus came he made the latter a free citizen instead of a freedman,
and put him in command, under the admiral Calvisius, of the ships which he
had brought with him. When he had finished these preparations and brought
together a still larger amount of war material he yet delayed, and he
reproached Antony for not waiting. He ordered Cornificius to bring with him
to Tarentum everything that was now in readiness. While Cornificius was
making the voyage a storm overtook him which destroyed only the admiral’s
ship, which had been built for Octavius himself. This was considered an omen
of what was to take place. As the belief still prevailed that this war was a
violation of the treaty, Octavius sought to dispel the suspicion. He wrote
to the city and he told his soldiers that Pompeius had violated the treaty
by encouraging piracy, that the pirates had confessed this, that Menodorus
had revealed the whole design, and that Antony knew it, and for that reason
had refused to give up the Peloponnesus. </p>
</div><div n="81" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When all things were in readiness he set sail for Sicily, going himself from
Tarentum, while Calvisius, with Sabinus and Menodorus, sailed from Etruria.
The infantry was sent on the march to Rhegium and great haste was displayed
in all quarters. Pompeius had scarcely heard of the desertion of Menodorus
when Octavius was already moving against him. While the hostile fleets were
advancing from both sides, he awaited the attack of Octavius at Messana, and
ordered his freedman Menecrates, who was the bitterest enemy of Menodorus,
to advance against Calvisius and Menodorus with a large fleet. Menecrates
was observed by his enemies near nightfall on the open sea. They retired
into the bay near Cumae, where they passed the night, Menecrates
proceeding to Aenaria. At daybreak they drew up their fleet, in the
form of a crescent, as close to the shore as possible, in order to prevent
the enemy from breaking through it. Menecrates again showed himself, and
immediately came on with a rush. As his enemies would not advance to the
open sea, and he could do nothing of importance there, he made a charge in
order to drive them upon the land. They beached their ships and fought back
against the attacking prows. Menecrates had the opportunity to draw off and
renew the attack as he pleased, and to bring up fresh ships by turns, while
the enemy were distressed by the rocks, on which they had grounded, and by
the inability to move. They were like infantry contending against sea
forces, unable either to pursue or retreat. </p>
</div><div n="82" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In this situation Menodorus and Menecrates came in sight of each other; and,
abandoning the rest of the fight, drove against each other with fury and
shouting, as though they had staked the issue of the battle on this
encounter, whichever should be the victor. Their ships came into violent
collision and were badly damaged, Menodorus losing his prow and Menecrates
his oar-blades. Grapplingirons were thrown by both, and the ships, being
fastened together, could no longer manœuvre, but the men, as in a
battle on land, failed not in deeds of valor. Showers of javelins, stones,
and arrows were discharged, and bridges for boarding were thrown from one
ship to the other. As the ship of Menodorus was higher than the other his
bridges made a better passageway for his daring crew, and his missiles were
more effective for the same reason. Many men were already slain, and the
remainder wounded, when Menodorus was pierced in the arm with a dart, which
was, however, drawn out. Menecrates was struck in the thigh with a Spanish
javelin, made wholly of iron with numerous barbs, which could not be readily
extracted. Although Menecrates could no longer take part in the fight, he
remained there all the same, encouraging the others, until his ship was
captured, when he plunged into the depths of the sea. Menodorus towed the
captured ship to the land, but was able to do nothing more himself. </p>
</div><div n="83" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>This took place on the left wing of the naval fight. Calvisius directed his
course from the right to the left and cut off some of Menecrates’ ships from
the main body, and when they fled pursued them to the open sea. Demochares,
who was a fellow-freedman of Menecrates and his lieutenant, fell upon the
remainder of Calvisius’ ships, put some of them to flight, broke others in
pieces on the rocks, and set fire to them after the crews had abandoned
them. Finally Calvisius, returning from the pursuit, led back his own
fleeing ships and prevented the burning of any more. As night was
approaching, all returned to their former station. Such was the end of this
naval fight, in which the forces of Pompeius had much the best of it; but
Demochares, grieving over the death of Menecrates as the greatest possible
defeat (for those two, Menecrates and Menodorus, had been the foremost of
Pompeius’ sea captains), abandoned everything<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἅπαντα μεθεὶς ἐκ
χειρῶν</foreign>: <emph>abandoned everything.</emph> All the
codices read <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐκ κέρων</foreign> (<emph>from
the wings</emph>), which, being nonsense, led to much conjecture
in the learned world. Schweighäuser solved the difficulty by
striking them out, and marking a lacuna at that place. Tyrwhitt
furnishes a happy solution (see preface to the Didot edition) by
substituting <foreign xml:lang="grc">χειρῶν</foreign> for <foreign xml:lang="grc">κέρων,</foreign>, so that the phrase is equivalent to
 <q rend="double">released his hold</q> in English.</note> and sailed for Sicily
immediately, mediately, as though he had lost not merely the body of
Menecrates and one ship, but his whole, fleet. </p>
</div><div n="84" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Calvisius, as long as he expected that Demochares would renew his attack,
remained at his station, unable to fight in the open sea, for his best ships
had been destroyed and the others were unfit for battle. When he learned
that his antagonist had gone to Sicily, he repaired his ships and coasted
along the shore exploring the bays. Octavius, in the meantime, proceeded
from Tarentum to Rhegium, with a large fleet and army, and near Messana came
up with Pompeius, who had forty ships only. Octavius’ friends advised him to
improve this most favorable opportunity and attack Pompeius with his great
fleet, while the latter had so few ships and before the rest of his naval
force should arrive. He did not follow this advice, but waited for
Calvisius, saying that it was not good policy to run a risk when he was
expecting reinforcements. When Demochares arrived at Messana, Pompeius
appointed him and Apollophanes, another of his freedmen, admirals in place
of Menodorus and Menecrates. </p>
</div><div n="85" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Octavius heard of his disaster at Cumae he sailed out of the
straits to meet Calvisius. After accomplishing the greater part of the
distance and while he was passing Stylis<note resp="translator">Schweighäuser gives this place the Latin name of
Columna Rhegina, which is referred to by Strabo (III. v. 5) as a small
tower erected by the inhabitants of Rhegium at the strait of
Sicily,</note> and turning into Scyllaeum, Pompeius darted out
of Messana and fell upon his rear, pushed on to his front, attacked him all
along the line, and challenged him to fight. Although beset in this way,
Octavius’ fleet did not give battle, since Octavius did not permit it,
either because he feared to fight in the straits or because he adhered to
his first determination not to fight without Calvisius. He gave orders,
however, that all should hug the shore, cast anchor, and defend themselves
with their prows toward the enemy. Demochares,by setting two of his ships by
turns against one of the enemy’s, threw them into confusion. They dashed
against the rocks and against each other, and began to fill with water. And
so these ships were lost, like those at Cumae, without striking a
blow, being stuck fast and battered by the enemy, who had freedom of
movement to advance and retreat.<note resp="translator">One of the mishaps to which ancient manuscripts were exposed is found
here. Several codices add to this sentence the words <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐμελλ’, ἐπεὶ οὐδέπω κακόν γ’ ἀπώλετο,</foreign>
<emph>very likely, since nothing that is bad ever perishes.</emph>
Musgrave stamped it as erroneous. Schweighäuser recognized it
as an iambic verse from some poet whom he could not recall, and inferred
that somebody had written it on the margin of his copy, and that the
next copyist had embodied it in the text. So he rejected it. Nauck
points out the original in the <title>Philoctetes</title> of Sophocles
(446). It is found in the <foreign xml:lang="lat">editio princeps</foreign> of Appian
and in the Latin versions of both Candidus and Geslen, whose attempts to
reconcile it with the text are ingenious but futile.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="86" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius leaped from his ship upon the rocks and pulled out of the water
those who swam ashore, and conducted them to the mountain above. However,
Cornificius and the other generals who were there, encouraged each other,
cut loose from their anchors without awaiting orders, and put to sea against
the enemy, thinking that it was better to be conquered fighting than to fall
unresisting before the blows of their assailants. First, with wonderful
audacity, Cornificius rammed the flag-ship of Demochares and captured it.
The latter leaped upon another vessel. Then, while the struggle and carnage
were in progress, Calvisius and Menodorus hove in sight, advancing from the
open sea, although they had not been observed by Octavius’ men either from
the land or the water. The Pompeians, being farther out at sea, beheld them
first, and, when they saw them, retreated, for darkness was approaching,
and, fatigued as they were, they dared not encounter fresh men. This
conjuncture happened very opportunely for those who had just now been in
difficulties. </p>
</div><div n="87" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>At nightfall, those who had reached the shore from the ships took refuge on
the mountains and lighted numerous fires as signals to those who were still
on the sea, and there passed the night without food, uncared for, and in
want of everything. Octavius fared like the rest, and moved around exhorting
them to endure their privations till morning. While he was undergoing these
hardships it was not known that Calvisius had arrived, nor could anything
thing needful be obtained from the ships in their wrecked condition. But
good luck came to them from another quarter. The thirteenth legion was
approaching by way of the mountains, and, learning of the disaster and
judging of the road by the fire, they made their way through the crags. They
found their commander, and those who had taken refuge with him, suffering
from fatigue and want of food, and ministered to them, dividing the work,
some caring for some, others for others. The centurions brought their
commander into an improvised tent, as none of his body-servants were
present, these having been dispersed in the darkness and disorder. He sent
messengers in all directions forthwith, to announce that he was safe, and he
learned that Calvisius had arrived with the vanguard of his fleet; and, in
view of these two helpful and unexpected events, he allowed himself some
rest.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER X</head>
<head>Terrible Storm in the Straits of Sicily — Destruction of Octavius’ Fleet
— Great loss of Life — Octavius retreats to Vibo — Pompeius does not
pursue — Octavius appeals to Antony for Aid — Antony comes to his
Assistance with Three Hundred Ships — Meeting of Octavius and Antony —
Antony returns to his Parthian Expedition — Menodorus deserts to
Pompeius</head>
<div n="88" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The next morning, when Octavius looked out upon the water, he beheld some of
his ships burned, others partly burned, others still burning, and others
broken in pieces; and the sea filled with sails, rudders, and furniture,
while, of the ships that were saved, the greater part were damaged. Having
ranged the fleet of Calvisius in front, he made repairs on those of his
vessels that most needed them, turning them on their sides,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπεσκεύαζε
τὰ ἐπείγοντα τῶν σκαφῶν πλαγιάσας.</foreign>
Schweighäuser’s Latin version renders this: <q rend="double">He repaired those
which especially required attention, sailing in the meantime near the
shore on an oblique course.</q> Yet in a note on this passage he inclines
to the opinion that <foreign xml:lang="grc">πλαγιάσας</foreign> means,
not sailing obliquely, but turning the ships on their sides — a more
rational method of making repairs. The Didot edition adheres to the
former rendering.</note> the enemy meantime remaining quiet, either
because they feared Calvisius, or because they had decided to attack again
in the open sea. Thus they remained on either side until midday, when a
south wind burst upon them, raising violent billows in that surging and
confined channel. Pompeius was then inside the harbor of Messana. The ships
of Octavius were again shattered on the rough and inhospitable coast,
dashing against the rocks and against each other, for, as they were not
fully manned, they were not under good control. </p>
</div><div n="89" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Menodorus, apprehending that this rising storm would increase in violence,
moved farther seaward and rode at anchor where, on account of the depth of
water, the waves were less boisterous; and even here he had recourse to hard
rowing to avoid being driven ashore. Some of the others followed his
example, but most of them, thinking that the wind would soon subside, as it
usually did in the springtime, moored themselves with anchors on either
side, landward and seaward, and thrust out poles to prevent collisions with
each other. As the wind grew more violent everything was thrown into
confusion. The ships collided, broke their anchors, and were upset on the
shore one after another. Cries of alarm and groans of pain were mingled
together, and exhortations that fell upon deaf ears. Orders could not be
heard. There was no distinction between pilot and common sailor. Knowledge
and authority were alike unavailing. The same destruction awaited those in
the ships and those who fell overboard, the latter being crushed by wind,
waves, and floating timber. The sea was full of sails, spars, and men,
living and dead. Those who sought to escape by swimming to land were dashed
against the rocks by the surf. When the convulsion seized the water,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">Ὡς δὲ
καὶ τὸ σπάσμα τῆν θάλασσαν ἐλάμβανεν.</foreign> This refers
to the whirlpool at Charybdis.</note> as is usual in that strait, they
were terrified, being unaccustomed to it, and then their vessels were
whirled around and dashed against each other worse than ever. As night came
on the wind increased in fury, so that they perished no longer in the light
but in the darkness. </p>
</div><div n="90" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Groans were heard throughout the entire night, and the cries of men running
along the shore and calling their friends and relatives upon the sea by
name, and mourning for them as lost when they could hear no responses; and
anon the cries of others lifting their heads above the waves and beseeching
aid from those on shore. Nothing could be done on either land or water. Not
only was the sea inexorable to those engulfed in it, as well as to those
still in the ships, but the danger from the storm was almost as great on
land, lest the surf should dash them against the rocks. So distressed were
they by this unexampled tempest that those who were nearest the land feared
the land, yet could not get sufficient offing to avoid collision with each
other, for the narrowness of the place and its naturally difficult outlet,
together with the force of the waves, the rotary motion of the wind, caused
by the surrounding mountains, and the whirlpool of the deep, holding
everything in its grasp, allowed neither tarrying nor escape. The darkness
of a very black night added to their distress. And so they perished, no
longer even seeing each other, some uttering confused cries, others yielding
in silence, accepting their doom, some even hastening it, believing that
they were utterly lost. The disaster so far surpassed their experience that
it bereft them of the hope of saving themselves even by chance. Finally, at
the approach of daylight, the wind suddenly relaxed its force, and after
sunrise wholly died away; yet even then, although the storm had ceased, the
surges rolled a long time. The fury of the tempest surpassed the memory of
the oldest inhabitants. It was altogether unexampled, and the greater part
of Octavius’ ships and men were destroyed by it. </p>
</div><div n="91" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius, who had lost heavily in the battle the previous day and had
sustained two severe calamities together, took the road in haste to Vibo
that same night, by way of the mountains, being unable to repair this
disaster, for which there was no help at hand. He wrote to all his friends
and generals to be on the alert lest a plot should be formed against him
here or there, as is liable to be the case when adversity comes. He
despatched the infantry he had with him to all points on the Italian coast,
lest Pompeius should be emboldened by his good luck even to invade the
mainland. But the latter had no thought of an expedition by land. He did not
even attack the ships that were left from the wreck, nor those that went
away after the storm had subsided. On the contrary, he paid no attention to
the enemy while they were tying their ships together with ropes as well as
they could, and sailing with a favorable wind to Vibo. He neglected them
either because he thought that the disaster was all-sufficient for him, or
because he did not know how to follow up a victory, or, as I have said
elsewhere, because he was altogether inefficient in attack and cared only to
defend himself against assailants. </p>
</div><div n="92" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Less than half of Octavius’ ships were saved, and these badly damaged. He
left certain officers in charge of them and proceeded to Campania much cast
down, for he had no other ships and he needed many; nor did he have time to
build them, pressed as he was by the famine and by the people, who were
again harassing him about a new treaty and mocking at the war as being in
violation of the old one. He needed money, but had none. The Romans were not
paying the taxes, nor would they allow the use of the revenues that he had
devised. But he was always clever at discovering what was for his advantage.
He sent <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 717</note>
Maecenas to Antony to change the mind of the latter respecting
<note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0037">37</date></note> the things about which they had lately had some
bickering, and to bring him to an alliance. If Maecenas should not
succeed, he intended to embark his infantry on merchant vesels, cross over
to Sicily, abandon the sea, and wage war on land. While in this state of
dejection the news reached him that Antony had agreed to the alliance, and
he heard of a splendid victory over the Gauls of Aquitania, gained under the
leadership of Agrippa. His friends and certain cities also promised him
ships, and built them. Accordingly, Octavius cast off his despondency, and
made more formidable preparations than his previous ones. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 718</note>
</p>
</div><div n="93" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>At the beginning of spring, Antony set sail from Athens to Tarentum with 300
ships to assist Octavius as he had promised. But the latter had changed his
mind and postponed his movement until his own ships should be finished. When
called upon again and told that Antony’s forces were ready and sufficient,
he advanced other reasons for delay. It was evident that he was again
offended with Antony about something, or that he disdained his assistance
because his own resources were abundant. Antony was vexed, but he remained,
nevertheless, and communicated <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 716</note> with Octavius again, because the expense of his fleet
was <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0036">36</date></note> burdensome. Moreover, he needed Italian soldiers
for his war against the Parthians, and he contemplated exchanging his fleet
for a part of Octavius’ army; for, although it was provided in their treaty
that each of them might recruit soldiers in Italy, it would be difficult for
him to do so when Italy had fallen to the lot of Octavius. Accordingly,
Octavia betook herself to her brother to act as mediator between them.
Octavius complained that he had been abandoned by Antony when he was
overtaken by danger in the straits. She replied that that had been explained
through Maecenas. Octavius said that Antony had sent his freedman
Callias to Lepidus in Africa to induce the latter to make an alliance
against him. She replied that she knew that Callias had been sent to make
arrangements about a marriage, because Antony desired, before setting out on
his Parthian expedition, to marry his daughter to the son of Lepidus, as had
been agreed. After Octavia had made this statement Antony sent Callias to
Octavius with permission to put him to torture [in order to learn the
truth]. Octavius would not receive him, but said that he would go and have
an interview with Antony between Metapontum and Tarentum, at a place where
there is a river of the latter name between them.<note resp="translator">The river Taras.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="94" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>They both chanced to reach the river at the same time. Antony sprang down
from his chariot and leaped alone into one of the skiffs moored near by, and
rowed toward Octavius, showing confidence in him as a friend. When Octavius
saw this he followed the example. So they met in the stream and contended
with each other which of them should disembark on the other’s bank. Octavius
prevailed because he was going to make a visit to Octavia at Tarentum. He
took a seat with Antony in the latter’s chariot, and proceeded to his
lodgings at Tarentum unprotected, and passed the night there without guards.
On the following day Antony made the same exhibition of trust. Thus they
were continually changing from suspicion born of rivalry to confidence due
to their mutual needs. </p>
</div><div n="95" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>However, Octavius postponed his expedition against <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R. 718</note> Pompeius till the following year.
On account of the Parthian war Antony was not able to wait. Nevertheless,
they made an exchange with each other, Antony giving to Octavius 120 ships,
which he sent at once and delivered at Tarentum, in return for which
Octavius promised to send him 20,000 Italian legionaries. Octavia, begging
the favor from Antony, made her brother a present of ten three-banked
phaseli — a combination of war-ship and merchant vessel — and Octavius
gave her in return 1000 picked men as a body-guard, to be selected by
Antony. As the term of the triumvirate voted to them was about expiring,
they renewed it for five years without again asking the people. And so they
separated, Antony proceeding straightway to Syria and leaving Octavia with
her brother, and also a daughter already born to them. </p>
</div><div n="96" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>But Menodorus, — either because he was an habitual traitor, or because he
feared the former threat of Antony, who had said that he would punish him as
a rebellious slave, or because he had received less consideration than he
had expected, or because the other freedmen of Pompeius were continually
reproaching him for unfaithfulness to his master and urging him to return,
— now that Menecrates was dead, asked forgiveness, and, having obtained it,
deserted to Pompeius with seven ships, without the knowledge of Octavius’
admiral, Calvisius. For this reason Octavius dismissed the latter from his
command and appointed Agrippa in his place. When the fleet was ready,
Octavius performed a lustration for it in the following manner. Altars were
erected on the margin of the sea, and the multitude were ranged around them
in ships, observing the most profound silence. The priests who performed the
ceremony offered the sacrifice while standing at the water’s edge, and
carried the expiatory offerings in skiffs three times around the fleet, the
general sailing with them, beseeching the gods to turn the bad omens against
the victims instead of the fleet. Then, dividing the entrails, they cast a
part of them into the sea, and put the remainder on the altars and burned
them, while the multitude chanted in unison. In this way the Romans perform
lustrations of the fleet. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="11" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XI</head>
<head>New Expedition against Sextus Pompeius — Lepidus brings a Fleet from
Africa — Another Storm damages Octavius’ Ships and causes Delay-Sextus
fails to take Advantage of these Occurrences — Menodorus turns Traitor
again — Surrenders his Ships and himself to Octavius — Disposition of
the Forces of Octavius — Disaster to Lepidus on the Sea — Agrippa
occupies the Island of Hiera — He attacks the Pompeian Fleet, and wins
a Victory</head>

<div n="97" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>It was intended that Octavius should set sail from Puteoli, Lepidus from
Africa, and Taurus from Tarentum, to Sicily, in order to surround the enemy
at once, from the east, the west, and the south. The day of Octavius’
sailing had been previously communicated to all. It was the tenth day after
the summer solstice. This, in the Roman calendar, was the calends of the
month which, in honor of the first Caesar, they call July instead
of Quintilis. Octavius fixed on this day, perhaps because he considered it
propitious on account of his father, who was always victorious. Pompeius
stationed Plennius at Lilybaeum with one legion and a considerable
body of light-armed troops, to oppose Lepidus. He guarded the whole coast of
Sicily, both east and west, and especially the islands of Lipara and
Cossyra, lest they should become convenient harbors and naval stations for
Octavius and Lepidus against Sicily. The best part of his naval force he
kept together at Messana watching its chances. In this way they made their
preparations on either side. </p>
</div><div n="98" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the calends came they all set sail at daybreak, Lepidus from Africa with
1000 ships of burden, seventy war vessels, twelve legions of soldiers, 500
Numidian horse, and a great quantity of apparatus; Taurus from Tarentum with
only 102 of the 130 ships that Antony had left, since the oarsmen of the
remainder had perished during the winter. Octavius sailed from Puteoli,
offering sacrifices and pouring out libations from the admiral’s ship into
the water to the propitious winds, and to Neptune, the guardian, and to the
tranquil sea, that they should be his assistants against his father’s
enemies. Certain ships sent in advance made examination of the bays, and
Appius with a large squadron followed as a rear guard. On the third day
after their departure a south wind blew with violence and capsized a large
number of ships of burden belonging to Lepidus. Nevertheless, he reached the
Sicilian coast, laid siege to Plennius in Lilybaeum, and got
possession of some towns by persuasion and others by force. When the wind
began to blow Taurus returned to Tarentum. While Appius was doubling the
promontory of Minerva, some of his ships were shattered against the rocks,
others ran with violence on the shoals, and the rest were dispersed, not
without injury. At the beginning of the storm, Octavius took refuge in the
sheltered bay of Elea, except one six-banked ship, which was wrecked on the
promontory. The south wind was succeeded by a southwester, which threw the
bay into commotion, as it opened toward the west. It was impossible to sail
out of the bay with the wind still ahead, nor could the ships be held by
oars or anchors. They crashed against each other or against the rocks, and
the confusion became worse confounded by night. </p>
</div><div n="99" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the tempest had subsided, Octavius buried the dead, cared for the
wounded, clothed those who had swum ashore and furnished them with new
weapons, and repaired his whole fleet with the means at his command. Six of
his heavy ships, twenty-six lighter ones, and a still larger number of
liburnicas had been destroyed. He was likely to consume nearly thirty days
in these repairs; and now the end of summer was approaching, for which
reason he deemed it best to postpone the war till the following summer, but
as the people were suffering from scarcity he drew his ships upon the land
and made his preparations rapidly, and sent the crews of the ships that he
had lost to fill the empty ones in the fleet of Taurus. In anticipation of
more serious misfortune he sent Maecenas to Rome on account of
those who were still under the spell of the memory of Pompey the Great, for
the fame of that man had not yet lost its influence over them. Octavius
himself visited the new colonies throughout Italy and dispelled their fears,
which had been excited by the recent events. He also went to Tarentum and
inspected the naval force under Taurus. Thence he proceeded to Vibo, where
he encouraged his infantry and hastened the preparations of his fleet, the
time for his second invasion of Sicily being near at hand. </p>
</div><div n="100" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompeius did not deign to seize the fine opportunity presented to him by so
many shipwrecks. He merely offered sacrifice to the sea and to Neptune,
assuming to call himself their son, and persuading himself that it was not
without the special act of Providence that his enemies had been twice
overwhelmed in this way in the summer months. It is said that he was so much
puffed up by these circumstances that he exchanged the purple cloak
customary to Roman commanders for a dark blue one, to signify that he was
the adopted son of Neptune. He hoped that Octavius would now desist from his
undertaking, but when he learned that the latter was building ships and was
about to renew the expedition against him that summer, he became alarmed at
finding himself at war with a man of such indomitable spirit and such
formidable preparations. He sent Menodorus, with the seven ships he had
brought, to reconnoitre the dockyards of Octavius and to do whatever damage
he could. Menodorus had been vexed for some time past because the naval
command had not been given to him, and he now perceived that he was
intrusted with only the ships that he had brought, because he was under
suspicion. So he plotted a new desertion. </p>
</div><div n="101" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Conceiving that, however matters might turn out, he should first signalize
himself by some act of valor, he distributed among his companions all the
gold he had, and sailed, by rowing three days, accomplishing a distance of
1500 stades, and fell like a thunderbolt,
unperceived, on the vessels that were guarding Octavius’ shipyards, and
darted away to an unseen place carrying off the guard-ships by twos and
threes. He also sunk, or captured, or burned some merchant vessels, laden
with corn, that were moored there or sailing along the coast. Everything was
thrown into confusion by this raid of Menodorus, both Octavius and Agrippa
being absent. The latter had gone away to procure timber. In a spirit of
bravado Menodorus ran his ship upon the soft ground, voluntarily and
contemptuously, and pretended to be stuck in the mud, until his enemies
dashed down from the mountains as to a certain prey, when he backed away,
laughing, and left the soldiers of Octavius the victims of both chagrin and
astonishment. When he had sufficiently shown what he was capable of, as
enemy or friend, he dismissed a senator whom he had taken prisoner, named
Rebillus, having a view already to the future. </p>
</div><div n="102" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>During his former desertion he had been a friend of Mindius Marcellus, one of
the companions of Octavius, and he now told his own men that Mindius had the
intention of betraying his party and deserting to that of Pompeius. Then he
drew near to the enemy and invited Mindius to go with him to a small island
in order to have a conference. When the latter came, and there was nobody
else within earshot, Menodorus said that he had gone back to Pompeius
because he was ill-treated by the admiral of those days, Calvisius, but that
since Agrippa had been appointed to the command of the fleet he would come
back to Octavius, who had done him no wrong, if Mindius would bring him a
safe-conduct from Messala, who was commanding in Agrippa’s absence. He said
that on his return he would make amends for his fault by brilliant exploits,
but that until the safe-conduct arrived he should be obliged to harass the
forces of Octavius as before in order to avoid suspicion; and this he did.
Messala hesitated on account of the baseness of the transaction, but he
nevertheless yielded, either because he considered such things necessary in
war, or because he had learned beforehand, or conjectured, the mind of
Octavius. Menodorus at once deserted, and, upon the approach of Octavius,
threw himself at his feet and begged that he would pardon him without asking
for the reasons for his flight. Octavius conceded his safety on account of
the pledges made, but had him secretly watched. He dismissed the captains of
his triremes and allowed them to go wherever they pleased. </p>
</div><div n="103" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the fleet was ready Octavius set sail again. He landed at Vibo and
ordered Messala, who had two legions of infantry, to cross over to Sicily,
join the army of Lepidus, pass through to the bay in front of Tauromenium,
and station himself there. He sent three legions to Stylis and the extremity
of the straits, to await events. He ordered Taurus to sail around from
Tarentum to Mount Scylacium, which is opposite Tauromenium.<note resp="translator">The geography here is in
confusion. Mount Scylacium is not opposite Tauromenium. Mendelssohn
considers the text corrupt.</note> Taurus did so, having prepared
himself for fighting as well as for rowing. His infantry kept even pace with
him, the cavalry reconnoitring by land and the liburnicas by sea. While he
was making this movement Octavius, who had advanced from Vibo, made his
appearance near Scylacium, and, after giving his approval to the good order
of the forces, returned to Vibo. Pompeius, as I have already said, guarded
all the landing-places on the island and retained his fleet at Messana, in
order to send aid where it might be needed. </p>
</div><div n="104" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Such were the preparations of Octavius and Pompeius in this quarter.
Meanwhile four more legions were en route to Lepidus from Africa in merchant
ships, being the remainder of his army. Papias, one of Pompeius’ captains,
threw himself in their way on the sea, and, after they had received him as a
friend (for they thought that these were ships sent by Lepidus to meet
them), destroyed them. Some ships were despatched by Lepidus later, and when
these were approaching, the merchant ships that had escaped mistook them for
other enemies and fled. So some of them were burned, some captured, some
upset, and the rest returned to Africa. Two legions perished in the sea, or,
if any of them could swim, Tisienus, the lieutenant of Pompeius, slew them
when they reached the land. The other legions reëmbarked and joined
Lepidus, some sooner and some later. Papias sailed back to Pompeius. </p>
</div><div n="105" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius crossed from Vibo with his whole fleet to Strongyle,<note resp="translator">The modern Stromboli.</note> one
of the five Aeolian islands, having made a reconnoissance of the
sea beforehand. Seeing large forces in front of him on the Sicilian shore at
Pelorum, Mylae, and Tyndaris, he conjectured that Pompeius himself
was there. So he left Agrippa in command and returned again to Vibo, and
thence hastened with Messala and three legions to the camp of Taurus,
intending to seize Tauromenium while Pompeius was still absent, and thus
threaten him on two sides at once. In pursuance of this plan Agrippa moved
forward from Strongyle to the island of Hiera, and as Pompeius’ garrison
made no resistance he occupied it and intended on the following day to
attack, at Mylae, Demochares, the lieutenant of Pompeius, who had
forty ships. Pompeius observed the menacing attitude of Agrippa, and sent to
Demochares from Messana forty-five ships, under the command of his freedman
Apollophanes, and followed in person with seventy others. </p>
</div><div n="106" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Agrippa, with half of his ships, sailed out of Hiera before daylight in order
to have a naval engagement with Papias<note resp="translator">This is evidently a copyist’s mistake for Demochares. The
preceding section says that Demochares was in Agrippa’s front, and Dion
Cassius (xlix. 2) tells us that the battle that took place here was
between Agrippa and Demochares. Suetonius (<title>Aug.</title> 16) adds
the name of Apollophanes.</note> only. When he saw the fleet of
Apollophanes also, and seventy ships on the other wing, he sent word to
Octavius at once that Pompeius was at Mylae with the greater part
of his naval forces. Then he placed himself with his heavy ships in the
centre, and summoned the remainder of his fleet from Hiera in all haste. The
preparations on both sides were superb. The ships had towers on both stem
and stern. When the usual exhortation had been given and the standards
raised, they rushed against each other, some coming bow on, others making
flank attacks, the shouts of the men and the spray from the ships adding
terror to the scene. The Pompeian ships were shorter and lighter, and better
adapted to blockading and darting about. Those of Octavius were larger and
heavier, and, consequently, slower, yet stronger to give blows and not so
easily damaged. The Pompeian crews were better sailors than those of
Octavius, but the latter were stronger. Accordingly, the former excelled not
so much in close fighting as in the nimbleness of their movements, in
breaking oar blades and rudders, cutting off oar handles, or separating the
enemy’s ships entirely, doing them no less harm than by ramming. Those of
Octavius sought to cut down with their beaks the hostile ships, which were
smaller in size, or shatter them, or break through them. When they came to
close quarters, being higher, they could hurl missiles down upon the enemy,
and more easily throw the corvus<note resp="translator">The corvus was a framework with a hook at its extremity. It was carried
in an upright position on the prow and worked by a hinge at the bottom,
and was used for the same purpose as the grappling-irons, to seize and
hold fast the enemy’s ships.</note> and the grappling-irons. The
Pompeians, whenever they were overpowered in this manner, leaped into the
sea and were picked up by their small boats, which were hovering around for
this purpose. </p>
</div><div n="107" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Agrippa bore down directly upon Papias and struck his ship under the bow,
shattering it and breaking a hole in the keel. The men in the towers were
shaken down, the water rushed into the ship, and all the oarsmen on the
lower benches were cut off. The others broke through the deck and escaped by
swimming. Papias escaped to a ship alongside of his own, and returned to the
battle. Pompeius, who observed from a mountain that his ships were making
little headway, and that whenever they came to close quarters with the enemy
they were denuded of fighting men, and that reinforcements were coming to
Agrippa from Hiera, gave the signal to retire in good order. This they did,
advancing and retreating little by little. Agrippa continued to bear down
upon them, and they took refuge, not on the beach, but among the shoals
formed in the sea by river deposits. </p>
</div><div n="108" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Agrippa’s pilots prevented him from running his large ships on the shoals. He
cast anchor in the open sea, intending to blockade the enemy and to fight a
battle by night if necessary; but his friends advised him not to be carried
away by rashness and not to wear out his soldiers with excessive toil and
want of sleep, and not to trust to that tempestuous sea. So in the evening
he reluctantly withdrew. The Pompeians made sail to their harbors, having
lost thirty of their ships, and sunk five of the enemy’s, and having
inflicted considerable other damage and suffered as much in return. Pompeius
praised his own men because they had resisted such formidable vessels,
saying they had fought against walls rather than against ships; and he
rewarded them as though they had been victorious. He encouraged them to
believe that, as they were lighter, they would prevail over the enemy in the
straits on account of the current. He said also that he would make some
addition to the height of his ships. Such was the result of the naval battle
at Mylae between Agrippa and Papias. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XII</head>
<head>Octavius crosses the Straits and demands the Surrender of Tauromenium —
He is suddenly attacked by Pompeius by Land and Sea — Octavius’ Fleet
is beaten and dispersed — Cornificius is left in Camp near Tauromenium
— Octavius escapes to the Shore and rallies his Land Forces —
Cornificius marches across Sicily — Terrible Sufferings of his Troops
— He is rescued by Agrippa — Octavius effects a Lodgement on the
Northern Coast of Sicily — An Eruption of Mount Etna — Pompeius
challenges Octavius to a Naval Engagement — The Challenge is accepted
— A Stubborn and Protracted Contest — Agrippa gains the Victory —
Pompeius flees to Messana — He departs from Sicily — Lepidus plunders
Messana</head>

<div n="109" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompeius suspected that Octavius had gone to the camp of Taurus for the
purpose of attacking Tauromenium, which was the fact. So, directly after
supper, he sailed to Messana, leaving a part of his forces at Mylae
so that Agrippa might think that he was still there. Agrippa, as soon as his
army was sufficiently rested, bestirred himself and set sail for Tyndaris,
which had offered to surrender. He entered the town, but the garrison fought
valiantly and drove him out. Some other towns espoused his cause and
received his garrisons, and he returned that evening. In the meantime,
Octavius had sailed from Scylacium to Leucopetra,<note resp="translator">The modern <title>Capo dell’ Armi.</title></note>
having learned for a certainty that Pompeius had gone from Messana to
Mylae on account of Agrippa. He was about to cross the straits from
Leucopetra to Tauromenium by night, but learning of the sea-fight he changed
his mind, thinking that a victor ought not to steal his passage, but to
cross with his army boldly by daylight; for he was fully convinced that
Pompeius was still confronting Agrippa. Looking down from the mountains upon
the sea at daybreak and finding that it was clear of enemies, he set sail
with as many troops as the ships could carry, leaving the rest with Messala
until the fleet could return to him. Arriving at Tauromenium, he sent
messengers to demand its surrender. As his guards were not admitted, he made
sail to the river Onobalas and the temple of Venus, and moored his fleet at
the shrine of the Archegetes, the god of the Naxians,<note resp="translator">The word <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀρχηγέτης</foreign> means the Founder, <emph>i.e.,</emph>
the founder of a colony. It was applied here to the god Apollo, in whose
honor an altar and a small statue had been erected at Naxos (the modern
<title>Capo di Schiso</title>), in Sicily. Immediately following
this word in all the codices are the words <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀξιῶν
τὸν θεὸν,</foreign> in which Musgrave detected an error for
<foreign xml:lang="grc">Ναξίων τὸν θεὸν</foreign> (the god of the Naxians). Schweighäuser
was of the opinion that these words had been written as a marginal note
on some copy and afterwards introduced into the text. Cluver in his
<title>Sicilia Antiqua points</title> out an explanatory passage in
Thucydides (vi. 3. r) of the following tenor: <q rend="double">The Chalcideans were the
first of the Greeks who sailed from Eubœa, under the
leadership of Theucles, and built Naxos and erected the altar to Apollo
Archegetes, which now stands outside of the town, upon which the Theori,
as often as they make voyages from Sicily, first offer sacrifice.</q> The
river Onobalas is now called the <title>Cantara.</title></note>
intending to pitch his camp there and attack Tauromenium. The Archegetes is
a small statue of Apollo, erected by the Naxians when they first migrated to
Sicily. </p>
</div><div n="110" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Octavius disembarked from his ship he slipped and fell, but arose
without assistance. While he was yet laying out his camp, Pompeius made his
appearance with a large fleet—an astounding spectacle, since Octavius
believed that he had been beaten by Agrippa. Pompeius’ cavalry advanced at
the same time, rivalling the fleet in rapidity of movement, and his infantry
was seen on the other side. The forces of Octavius were terrified at finding
themselves surrounded by enemies on three sides, and Octavius himself was
alarmed because Messala could not join him. The cavalry of Pompeius assailed
Octavius’ men while they were still fortifying their camp. If his infantry
and his naval force had attacked simultaneously with the cavalry, Pompeius
might have accomplished greater results, but, being inexperienced in war and
ignorant of the panic among the troops of Octavius, and hesitating to begin
a battle at the approach of nightfall, one part of his forces stationed
themselves at the promontory of Coccynus,<note resp="translator">No promontory, or place, of this name is mentioned by any
other ancient author, whose works have reached us.</note> while his
infantry, deeming it unwise to encamp near the enemy, withdrew to the town
of Phœnix.<note resp="translator">This also is
an unknown place, except as it is here mentioned. There was a
Phœnicus Portus in Sicily, but it was too far distant from
Tauromenium to be of service as here described.</note> Night coming on
they went to rest, and Octavius’ soldiers finished their camp, but were
incapacitated for battle by toil and want of sleep. They consisted of three
legions, and 500 cavalry without horses, 1000 light-armed, and 2000
colonists serving as allies, but not enrolled, besides his fleet. </p>
</div><div n="111" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius placed all of his infantry under charge of Cornificius, and ordered
him to drive back the enemy and do whatever the exigencye required. He took
ship before daylight and went seaward lest the enemy should enclose him on
this side also, giving the right wing of the fleet to Titinius and the left
to Carcius, and embarking himself on a liburnica, with which he sailed
around the whole fleet, exhorting them to have courage. Having done this he
lowered the general’s ensign, as is customary in times of extreme danger.
Pompeius put to sea against him, and they encountered each other twice, the
battle ending with the night. Some of Octavius’ ships were captured and
burned; others spread their small sails and made for the Italian coast,
contrary to orders. Those of Pompeius followed them a short distance and
then turned against the remainder, capturing some and burning others. Some
of the crews swam ashore, most of whom were slaughtered or taken prisoners
by Pompeius’ cavalry. Some of them set out to reach the camp of Cornificius,
who sent only his light-armed troops to assist them as they came near,
because he did not consider it prudent to move his disheartened legionaries
against the enemy’s infantry, who were naturally much encouraged by their
victory. </p>
</div><div n="112" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius spent the greater part of the night among his small boats, in doubt
whether he should go back to Cornificius through the scattered remains of
his fleet, or take refuge with Messala. Providence brought him to the harbor
of Abala with a single armor-bearer, without friends, attendants, or slaves.
Certain persons, who had come down from the mountain to learn the news,
found him suffering in body and mind and brought him in rowboats (changing
from one to another for the purpose of concealment) to the camp of Messala,
which was not far distant. Straightway, and before he had attended to his
bodily wants, he despatched a liburnica to Cornificius, and sent word
throughout the mountains that he was safe, and ordered all his forces to
help Cornificius, and wrote to him that he would send him aid forthwith.
After attending to his own person and taking a little rest, he set forth by
night, accompanied by Messala, to Stylis, where Carinas was stationed with
three legions ready to embark, and ordered him to set sail for Lipara,<note resp="translator">Lipara was one of the
Aeolian islands lying north of Hiera, where Agrippa was
stationed.</note> to which place he would shortly follow. He wrote to
Agrippa and urged him to send Laronius with an army to the rescue of
Cornificius with all speed. He sent Maecenas again to Rome on
account of the revolutionists; and some of these, who were stirring up
disorder, were punished. He also sent Messala to Puteoli to bring the
so-called first legion to Vibo. </p>
</div><div n="113" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>This was the same Messala whom the triumvirs proscribed at Rome, and for the
killing of whom money and freedom were offered as rewards. He had fled to
Cassius and Brutus, and after their death had delivered his fleet to Antony,
in pursuance of an agreement made between them. It seems fitting to recall
this fact in honor of Roman magnanimity, inasmuch as Messala, when he had in
his power, overwhelmed with misfortune, the man who had proscribed him,
saved him and cared for him as his commander. Cornificius was able easily to
defend his camp against attack; but, being in danger from want of supplies,
he drew his men out for battle and challenged the enemy. But Pompeius did
not care to come to an engagement with men whose only hope rested in battle
and whom he expected to subdue by famine. Cornificius, having placed in the
centre the unarmed men who had escaped to him from the ships, took to the
road, grievously exposed to missiles in the open plains from the enemy’s
horsemen and in the broken country from the light-armed troops from Numidia
in Africa, who hurled darts from long distances and made their escape when
charged by their enemies. </p>
</div><div n="114" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>On the fourth day, with difficulty, they arrived at the waterless region
which they say was formerly inundated by a stream of fire that ran down as
far as the sea and dried up all the streams in the district. The inhabitants
of the country traverse it only by night, on account of the stifling heat
and the dust and ashes with which it abounds. Being ignorant of the roads
and fearing ambush, Cornificius and his men did not dare to march through it
by night, especially as there was no moon, nor could they endure the
daytime, because of suffocation. Moreover, the bottoms of their feet were
burned (especially those who had no shoes), as it was now the hottest part
of the summer. On account of the tormenting thirst they could not delay.
They could no longer charge upon their assailants, but received wounds
without any means of defence. When they saw the place of exit from this
burned district occupied by enemies, the able-bodied ones, heedless of their
sick and barefooted companions, dashed at the defiles with amazing courage
and overpowered the enemy with all their remaining strength. When they found
the next defiles occupied by hostile forces they gave way to despair and
succumbed to thirst and heat. Cornificius aroused them by showing them a
spring of water near by; and again they overpowered the enemy, but with
heavy loss to themselves. Another body of enemies held possession of the
fountain, and now Cornificius’ men lost all courage and gave way completely. </p>
</div><div n="115" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>While they were in this state Laronius, who had been sent by Agrippa with
three legions, made his appearance a long way off. Although it was not yet
plain that he was a friend, still, as they had been all the time hoping for
something of this kind, they once more recovered their spirits. When they
saw the enemy abandon the water in order not to be exposed to attack on both
sides, they shouted for joy with all their strength. When the troops of
Laronius shouted in return, they ran and seized the fountain. The leaders
forbade the men to drink to excess. Some who neglected this advice died
while drinking. In this unexpected manner did Cornificius, and what was left
of his army, escape to Agrippa at Mylae.<note resp="translator">Dion Cassius (xlix. 6-7) gives an account, in
many respects similar to this, of the terrible sufferings of Cornificius
and his command in their march through Sicily, until rescued by Agrippa.
The words <q rend="double">at Mylae</q> should be expunged. A few lines below we
read that the garrison of Pompeius still held Mylae, and a
little later that it was taken from him by Octavius.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="116" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Agrippa had just taken Tyndaris, a stronghold full of provisions and
admirably situated for naval warfare. Thither Octavius transported his
infantry and cavalry. He had in Sicily all together twenty-one legions of
the former, 20,000 of the latter, and more than 5000 light-armed troops. The
garrison of Pompeius still held Mylae, and all the places from
Mylae to Naulochi and Pelorus, and all the coast. These garrisons,
in fear of Agrippa, kept fires burning continually, signifying that they
would set fire to any ships that should sail against them. Pompeius was also
master of the defiles on both sides of the island. The mountain passes in
the neighborhood of Tauromenium and around Mylae were fortified by
him, and he harassed Octavius when the latter was making a forward movement
from Tyndaris, but not coming to an engagement. Believing that Agrippa was
moving his fleet against him, Pompeius changed his position to Pelorus,
abandoning the defiles around Mylae; and Octavius occupied them and
also Mylae and Artemisium, a very small town, in which, they say,
were the cattle of the Sun and where Ulysses fell asleep.<note resp="translator"><title>Odyssey,</title> xii.
338.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="117" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the report of Agrippa’s movement turned out to be false, Pompeius was
troubled that he had lost the defiles,<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἡσθεὶς τῶν στενῶν
ἀφῃρημένος.</foreign> The first of these words implies that
Pompeius was delighted that he had lost the defiles. Both Candidus and
Geslen took it to be an error for <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἤσθετο</foreign> (perceived). Schweighäuser suggested
<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἤχθετο</foreign> (was troubled), and this
change is approved by Mendelssohn.</note> and he called to his
assistance Tisienus with his army. Octavius sought to intercept Tisienus,
but lost his way around Mount Myconium. He passed the night there without
tents. There was a heavy rainfall, as often occurs in the autumn, and some
of his armor-bearers held a Gallic shield over his head the whole night.
Harsh mutterings and prolonged roars from Mount Etna were heard, accompanied
by flames which lighted up the camp, so that the Germans sprang from their
beds in fear. Others, who had heard what had been related of Mount Etna,
would not have been surprised, in presence of these remarkable phenomena, if
a torrent of fire had rolled upon them. After this Octavius ravaged the
territory of the Abacaenians,<note resp="translator">The text says <q rend="double">Palestenians,</q> but Cluver gives reasons for
considering this an error for Abacaenians.</note> where
Lepidus, who was foraging, met him, and they both encamped near Messana. </p>
</div><div n="118" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As there had been many skirmishes throughout Sicily, but no general
engagement, Octavius sent Taurus to cut off Pompeius’ supplies by first
capturing the towns that furnished them. Pompeius was so much inconvenienced
by this that he decided to stake everything on a great battle. Since he
feared the enemy’s infantry, but had confidence in his own ships, he sent
and asked Octavius if he would allow the war to be decided by a naval
engagement. Octavius, although he dreaded all naval encounters, which until
now had turned out badly for him, considered it base to refuse, and,
accordingly, accepted the challenge. A day was fixed by them, for which 300
ships were put in readiness on either side, provided with missiles of all
kinds, with towers and whatever machines they could think of. Agrippa
devised one called the <foreign xml:lang="lat">harpago,</foreign> a piece of wood five
cubits long bound with iron and having rings at the extremities. To one of
these rings was attached the harpago, an iron claw, to the other numerous
ropes, which drew the harpago by machine power after it had been thrown by a
catapult and had seized the enemy’s ships. </p>
</div><div n="119" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the appointed day came the rival shouts of the oarsmen were first heard,
accompanied by missiles thrown by machines and by hand, such as stones,
firebrands, and arrows. Then the ships dashed against each other, some
striking amidships, others on the prows, others on the beaks, where the
blows are most effectual in discomposing the crew and rendering the vessel
useless. Others broke the opposing line by sailing through it, at the same
time discharging arrows and javelins; and the small boats picked up those
who fell overboard. There was a struggle of soldiers while the sailors put
forth their strength and the pilots their skill and their lung-power. The
generals cheered their men, and all the machines were brought into
requisition. The harpago achieved the greatest success. Thrown from a long
distance upon the ships, as it could be by reason of its lightness, it
clutched them, especially when the ropes pulled on it from behind. On
account of the iron bands it could not be easily cut by the men whom it
attacked, and those who tried to cut the ropes were prevented from reaching
them by its length. As this apparatus had never been known before, the enemy
had not provided themselves with scythe-mounted poles. One thing seemed
advisable in this unexpected emergency, and that was, to back water and draw
the ship away; but as the enemy did the same the force exerted by the men
was equal on both sides, and the harpago did its work. </p>
</div><div n="120" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Accordingly, when the ships were drawn together, there was every kind of
fighting, the men leaping upon each other’s decks. It was no longer easy to
distinguish an enemy from a friend, as they used the same weapons for the
most part, and nearly all spoke the Latin tongue, and the watchwords of each
side were divulged to the other while they were mingled together. Hence
arose many and divers frauds and lack of confidence on both sides on the
part of those using the same watchword. They failed to recognize each other
completely, and meanwhile the fighting and the sea were a confused medley of
corpses, clashing arms, and crashing ships. They left nothing untried except
fire. This they abstained from, after their first onset, because they were
locked together. The foot-soldiers of each army on the land beheld this
sea-fight with apprehension and eagerness, believing that their own hope of
safety was bound up in it. They could not distinguish anything, however
sharply they might look, but merely a long-drawn-out line of 600 ships, and
an alternation of cries and groans now on one side and now on the other. </p>
</div><div n="121" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Judging from the colors of the towers, which constituted the only difference
between them, Agrippa with difficulty made out that Pompeius’ ships had
sustained the greater loss, and he cheered on those who were close to him as
though they were already victors. Then he drove at the enemy and pressed
upon them without ceasing, until he overpowered those nearest him. They then
lowered their towers and turned their ships in flight toward the straits.
Seventeen of them, which were in advance, made their escape thither. The
rest were cut off by Agrippa and some were pursued and driven aground. The
pursuers ran aground with them in the rush, and either pulled off those that
had come to a standstill or set fire to them. When the Pompeian ships that
were still fighting saw what had befallen these, they surrendered to their
enemies. Then the soldiers of Octavius who were in the ships raised a shout
of victory and those on the land gave an answering shout. Those of Pompeius
groaned. Pompeius himself, darting away from Naulochi, hastened to Messana,
giving no orders to his infantry in his panic. Accordingly Octavius received
the surrender of Tisienus on terms agreed upon, and of the cavalry besides,
who were surrendered by their officers. Three of Octavius’ ships were sunk
in the fight. Pompeius lost twenty-eight in this way, and the remainder were
burned, or captured, or run aground, and stove in pieces, except the
seventeen that escaped. </p>
</div><div n="122" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompeius learned of the defection of his infantry while on the road, and
changed his costume from that of a commander to that of a private citizen,
and sent orders to Messana to put on shipboard everything possible. All
preparations to this end had been made long before. He summoned Plennius
from Lilybaeum in haste, with the eight legions he had, intending
to take flight with them. Plennius hastened to comply with this order, but
as other friends, garrisons, and soldiers were deserting, and the enemy’s
fleet was moving into the straits, Pompeius did not wait for Plennius in his
well-fortified city, but fled, with his seventeen ships, from Messana to
Antony, whose mother he had saved in similar circumstances. After his
departure Plennius arrived at Messana and occupied the place. Octavius
himself remained in the camp at Naulochi, but he ordered Agrippa to lay
siege to Messana, which the latter did, in conjunction with Lepidus.
Plennius sent envoys to treat for peace. Agrippa wanted to wait till morning
for the arrival of Octavius, but Lepidus granted terms, and, in order to
conciliate the soldiers of Plennius to himself, allowed them to join the
rest of the army in plundering the city. They had asked for nothing but
safety, and now, finding unexpected gain in addition, they plundered Messana
the whole night, in conjunction with the soldiers of Lepidus, and then
ranged themselves under his standards. </p>
</div></div>
 <div n="13" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XIII</head>
<head>Lepidus lays Claim to Sicily — Octavius tampers with his Troops —
Conflict in the Camp of Lepidus — He is deserted by his Soldiers —
Lepidus deposed from his Command — Octavius does not pursue Pompeius —
Mutiny in the Army — It is suppressed by Octavius — Octavius rewards
his Soldiers and returns to Italy — Unbounded Honors bestowed upon him
at Rome — He refuses to punish Lepidus — Robbery suppressed —
Octavius elected Tribune for Life</head>

<div n="123" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Including this new accession, Lepidus now had twenty-two legions of infantry
and a large body of cavalry. He was elated, and thought to make himself
master of Sicily, using the pretext that he was the first to invade the
island and that he had induced many cities to join the triumvirs. He sent
word to the garrisons of these places that they should not admit the
emissaries of Octavius, and he seized all the defiles. Octavius arrived on
the following day, and reproached Lepidus through friends, who reminded him
that he had come into Sicily as an ally of Octavius, not to acquire it for
himself. Lepidus replied that he had been despoiled of his former allotment,
which was now in the exclusive possession of Octavius, and that, if the
latter pleased, he would now exchange Africa and Sicily for that former
allotment. Octavius was exasperated. He came to Lepidus in anger and heaped
reproaches on him for ingratitude. They separated, indulging in mutual
threats. They forthwith surrounded themselves with guards, and the ships of
Octavius were anchored away from the shore, as it was said that Lepidus
intended to set fire to them. </p>
</div><div n="124" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The soldiers were angry at the thought of engaging in another civil war, and
that there was never to be an end of sedition. They did not, however, seek
to compare Octavius and Lepidus; not even the army of Lepidus did that. They
admired the energy of Octavius, and.they were aware of the indolence of
Lepidus. They also blamed him for admitting the defeated enemy to an equal
share of the plunder. When Octavius learned their state of mind, he sent
emissaries among them to advise them secretly of their individual interests.
Many of them he tampered with, especially those who had served under
Pompeius, who feared lest the terms of their capitulation should not be
valid if Octavius did not ratify them. While Lepidus, by reason of his
ineptitude, remained ignorant of these things Octavius came to his camp with
a large body of horse, whom he left at the entrance, and himself went in
with a few. Coming forward, he declared to those whom he met that he was
drawn into war unwillingly. Those who saw him saluted him as imperator.
First of all the Pompeians, who had been tampered with, collected together
and asked his forgiveness. He said that he was astonished that persons
asking forgiveness should not do what their own interests demanded. They
understood his meaning, and forthwith seized their standards and went over
to him, while others began to take down their tents. </p>
</div><div n="125" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When Lepidus became aware of this tumult he sprang from his tent to arms.
Blows were exchanged and one of Octavius’ armor-bearers was killed. Octavius
himself was struck by a weapon on his breastplate, but it did not penetrate
the flesh, and he ran and took refuge with his horsemen. A detachment of
guards belonging to Lepidus jeered at him as he ran. Octavius was so angry
that he could not restrain himself from dashing upon them with his
horsemen<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">πρὶν ἐξελεῖν αὐτὸ σὺν τοῖς ἱππεῦσι.</foreign>
Nauck suggests <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπελθεῖν</foreign> for <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐξελειν.</foreign> The latter word is meaningless
here.</note> and destroying them. The officers of the other guards
transferred their allegiance from Lepidus to Octavius, some immediately,
others during the night; some without solicitation, others pretending to be
coerced more or less by the cavalry. There were some who still resisted the
assault and beat off the assailants, for Lepidus sent reenforcements in all
directions; but when these very reënforcements went over, the
remainder of his army, even those who were yet well disposed toward him,
changed their opinion. Again the first to move were those Pompeians who
still remained with him. They transferred themselves by detachments, one
after another. Lepidus armed others to prevent them from going, but the very
ones who were armed for this purpose seized their standards and went over to
Octavius with the rest. Lepidus threatened and besought them as they took
their departure. He held fast to the standards, and said he would not give
them up, until one of the standard-bearers said to him, <q rend="double">Let go, or you are
a dead man.</q> Then he was afraid and let go. </p>
</div><div n="126" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The last to come over were the cavalry. They sent a messenger to Octavius to
ask if they should kill Lepidus, who was no longer a commander. He replied
in the negative. Thus was Lepidus deserted by all and bereft, in a moment of
time, of so exalted a station and so great an army. He changed his costume
and hastened to Octavius, all the spectators running with him to enjoy the
spectacle. Octavius started up as he approached, and prevented him from
throwing himself at his feet, and sent him to Rome in the garb of a private
citizen, which he was wearing, deprived of his command, but not of the
priesthood, which he held. And so this man, who had often been a commander
and once a triumvir, who had appointed magistrates and had proscribed so
many men of his own rank, passed his life as a private citizen, asking
favors of some of the proscribed, who were magistrates at a later
period.<note resp="translator">See iv. 50
<emph>supra.</emph></note>
</p>
</div><div n="127" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Octavius neither pursued Pompeius nor allowed others to do so; either because
he refrained from encroaching on Antony’s dominions, or because he preferred
to wait and see what Antony would do to Pompeius and make that a pretext for
a quarrel if he should do wrong (for they had long entertained the suspicion
that ambition would bring them into mutual conflict when other rivals were
out of the way), or, as Octavius said later, because Pompeius was not one of
his father’s murderers. He now brought his forces together, and they
amounted to forty-five legions of infantry, 25,000 horse, and some 40,000
light-armed troops. He also had 600 war-ships and an immense number of
merchant vessels, which he sent back to their owners. To the soldiers he
awarded the prizes of victory, paying a part down and promising the rest
later. He distributed crowns and other honors to all, and granted pardon to
the Pompeian leaders. </p>
</div><div n="128" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Fortune became jealous of his great prosperity.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">Ζήλου δὲ αὐτῷ γέμοντι ἐπὶ
τούτοις, τὸ δαιμόνιον ἐνεμέσησε τοῦ ζήλου. </foreign>
Mendelssohn thinks that the words <foreign xml:lang="grc">τοῦ
ζήλου</foreign> should be expunged.</note> His army revolted,
especially his own troops. They demanded to be discharged from the service
and that rewards should be given them equal to those given to the men who
fought at Philippi. Octavius knew that the present war had not been of the
same grade as that one. He promised nevertheless to pay what their services
were worth, and to include the soldiers serving under Antony when the latter
should return. As to their breach of discipline, he reminded them, in a
threatening tone, of the laws of their ancestors, of their oaths and of the
punishments. As they gave little heed to what he said, he abandoned his
threatening tone lest the spirit of mutiny should extend to his newly
acquired troops, and said that he would discharge them at the proper time in
conjunction with Antony. He said, also, that he would not engage them in any
more civil wars, which had fortunately come to an end, but in war against
the Illyrians and other barbarous tribes, who were disturbing the peace
which had been gained with so much difficulty; from which war the soldiers
would acquire great riches. They said that they would not go to war again
until they had received the prizes and honors of the previous wars. He said
that he would not postpone the honors. So he distributed many prizes, and
gave to the legions additional crowns, and to the centurions and tribunes
purple-bordered garments and the dignity of chief councillors in their
native towns. While he was distributing other awards of this kind, the
tribune Ofilius exclaimed that crowns and purple garments were playthings
for boys, that the rewards for soldiers were lands and money. The multitude
cried out, <q rend="double">Well said</q>; whereupon Octavius descended from the platform in
anger. The soldiers gathered around the tribune, praising him and railing at
those who did not join with them. Ofilius said that he alone would suffice
to defend so just a cause, but after saying this he disappeared the
following day, and it was never known what became of him. </p>
</div><div n="129" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The soldiers no longer dared to give utterance to their complaints singly,
but they joined together in groups and called for their discharge in common.
Octavius conciliated their leaders in various ways. He released those who
had served at Philippi and Mutina, and who wished to be discharged, as their
time had expired. These, to the number of 20,000, he dismissed and sent out
of the island at once, lest they should seduce the others. To those only <figure>
<head>AUGUSTUS</head>
<figDesc>In the Braccio Nuovo, Vatican Museum, Rome</figDesc>
</figure>
</p>
<p>who had served at Mutina he added, that, although they were discharged in
this way, he would fulfil the promises made to them at that time. He came
before the rest of the army and called upon them to bear witness to the
perjury of the revolters, who had been dismissed contrary to the wish of
their military commander. He praised those who remained with him, and
encouraged them to expect a speedy release, saying that nobody would be
sorry, and that they would be discharged rich, and that he would give them
500 drachmas per man now. Having thus spoken, he exacted tribute from Sicily
to the amount of 1600 talents, appointed
propraetors for Africa and Sicily, and assigned a division of the
army to each of these provinces. He sent back Antony’s ships to Tarentum. A
part of the army he sent in advance of himself to Italy in ships, and took
the remainder with him when he departed from the island. </p>
</div><div n="130" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When he arrived at Rome the Senate voted him unbounded honors, giving him the
privilege of accepting all, or such as he chose. They and the people went
out a long distance to meet him, wearing garlands on their heads, and
escorted him, when he arrived, first to the temples, and then from the
temples to his house. The next day he made speeches to the Senate and to the
people, recounting his exploits and his policy from the beginning to the
present time. These speeches he wrote down and distributed in pamphlet form.
He proclaimed peace and good-will, said that the civil wars were ended,
remitted the unpaid taxes, and released the farmers of the revenue and the
holders of public leases from what they owed. Of the honors voted to him, he
accepted an ovation<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">πομπὴν;</foreign> a procession inferior in splendor
and magnitude to a triumph, the latter being awarded only for victories
over foreign enemies. This ceremony was concluded with the sacrifice of
a sheep (<foreign xml:lang="lat">ovis</foreign>), from which the word <q rend="double">ovation</q> is
supposed to be derived.</note> and annual solemnities on the days of his
victories, and a golden image to be erected in the forum, with the garb he
wore when he entered the city, to stand on a column surrounded by the beaks
of captured ships. There the image was placed bearing the inscription:
 <quote><q rend="double">PEACE, LONG DISTURBED, HE REËSTABLISHED ON LAND AND
SEA.</q></quote>
</p>
</div><div n="131" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the people desired to transfer from Lepidus to himself the office of
pontifex maximus, which the law bestowed upon one person for life, he would
not accept it, and when they prayed that Lepidus might be put to death as a
public enemy he would not allow it. He sent sealed letters to all the
armies, with instructions to open them all on a designated day and to
execute the orders contained therein. These orders related to the slaves who
had run away during the civil dissensions and joined the armies, for whom
Pompeius had asked freedom, which the Senate and the treaty had granted.
These were all arrested on the same day and brought to Rome, and Octavius
returned them to their Roman or Italian masters, or to the heirs of the
same. He also gave back those belonging to Sicilian masters. Those whom
nobody claimed he caused to be put to death in the cities from which they
had absconded. </p>
</div><div n="132" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>This seemed to be the end of the civil dissensions. Octavius was now
twenty-eight years of age. Cities joined in placing him among their tutelary
gods. At this time Italy and Rome itself were openly infested with bands of
robbers, whose doings were more like barefaced plunder than secret theft.
Sabinus was chosen by Octavius to correct this disorder. He executed many of
the captured brigands, and within one year brought about a condition of
absolute security. At that time, they say, originated the custom and system
of cohorts of night watchmen still in force. Octavius excited astonishment
by having put an end to this evil with such unexampled rapidity. He allowed
the yearly magistrates to administer public affairs, in many particulars,
according to the customs of the fathers. He burned the writings which
contained evidence concerning the civil strife, and said that he would
abdicate entirely when Antony should return from the Parthian war, for he
was persuaded that Antony, too, would be willing to lay down the government,
the civil wars being at an end. Thereupon he was chosen tribune for life by
acclamation, the people urging him, by the offer of this perpetual
magistracy, to give up his former one.<note resp="translator">The true date of his election to the tribuneship, deduced
from the testament of Augustus inscribed on the wall of the Augusteum at
Ancyra, was B.C. <date when="-0025">25</date>, <emph>i.e.,</emph>
eleven years later than Appian makes it.</note> This he accepted, and at
the same time he wrote privately to Antony in reference to their government.
Antony gave instructions to Bibulus, who was going away from him, to confer
with Octavius. He sent governors to take charge of his provinces in like
manner as Octavius had done, and he had thoughts of joining the latter in
his expedition against the Illyrians.</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="14" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CHAPTER XIV</head>
<head>Sextus Pompeius flees to Antony — Forms Plans to assist Antony or
supersede him according to Circumstances — Sends an Embassy to Antony
— Antony sends Titius against him — Antony hears the Ambassadors — He
captures the Envoys sent by Pompeius to the Parthians — Double-dealing
of Pompeius discovered — He begins Hostilities against Antony’s
Lieutenants — Antony sends Reënforcements against him —
Pompeius deserted by his Friends — A Battle in the Night — Pompeius
offers to surrender to Furnius, who refuses to accept him — Pompeius
refuses to surrender to Titius — He is captured by Amyntas — He is
delivered to Titius, who puts him to Death</head>
<div n="133" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompeius, fleeing from Sicily to Antony, stopped at the Lacinian promontory
and robbed the rich temple of Juno of its gifts. He landed at Mitylene and
spent some time at that place, where his father, when at war with
Caesar, had bestowed him with his mother, when he was still a boy,
and where his father had recovered him after his defeat. As Antony was now
waging war in Media against the Medes and the Parthians, Pompeius decided to
intrust himself to Antony on his return. When he heard that Antony had been
worsted, and this result was confirmed by the reports, his hopes once more
revived, and he fancied that he might succeed Antony if the latter were
dead, or share his power if he returned. He was continually thinking of
Labienus, who had overrun Asia not long before. While he was in this frame
of mind the news reached him that Antony had returned to Alexandria.
Scheming with both projects, he sent ambassadors to Antony ostensibly to
place himself at the latter’s disposal and to offer himself as a friend and
ally, but really to get accurate information about Antony’s affairs. At the
same time he sent others secretly to the princes of Thrace and Pontus,
intending, if he should not obtain what he desired from Antony, to take
flight through Pontus to Armenia. He sent also to the Parthians, hoping
that, for the remainder of their war against Antony, they would be eager to
receive him as a general, because he was a Roman, and especially because he
was the son of Pompey the Great. He refitted his ships and drilled the
soldiers he had brought in them, pretending at one time that he was in fear
of Octavius, and at another that he was getting ready to assist Antony. </p>
</div><div n="134" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>As soon as Antony heard of the coming of Pompeius he designated Titius to
take the field against him. He ordered the latter to take ships and soldiers
from Syria and to wage war vigorously against Pompeius if he showed himself
hostile, but to treat him with honor if he submitted himself to Antony. Then
he gave audience to the ambassadors who had arrived, and who addressed him
as follows: <q rend="double">Pompeius has sent us to you, not because he was without a place
of refuge (if he were minded to continue the war) in Spain, a country
friendly to him on his father’s account and which espoused his own cause
when he was younger, and even now calls upon him for that purpose, but
because he prefers to enjoy peace with you, or, if need be, to fight under
your orders. He makes these advances now not for the first time, but did so
while he was master of Sicily and was ravaging Italy, and when he rescued
your mother and sent her to you. If you had accepted these advances,
Pompeius would not have been driven out of Sicily (for you would not have
provided Octavius with ships against him), nor would you have been defeated
in Parthia, in consequence of Octavius, not sending you the soldiers he
agreed to send. In fact, you would now be in possession of Italy in addition
to your other dominions. As you did not accept the offer at the time when it
would have been most advantageous to you, he repeats it now in order that
you may not be so often ensnared by Octavius’ words and by the marriage
relationship existing between you; for you will remember that, although he
is connected by marriage with Pompeius, he declared war against the latter
after the treaty had been made, and without excuse. He also deprived
Lepidus, his partner in the government, of his share, and divided no part of
it with you.</q> </p>
</div><div n="135" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p><q rend="double; merge">You are now the only remaining one who stands between him and the monarchy
that he longs for. He would already have been at blows with you, had not
Pompeius stood in the way. Although you ought to have foreseen these things
for yourself, Pompeius calls your attention to them out of good-will,
because he prefers a candid and magnanimous man to a deceitful, treacherous,
and artful one. He does not blame you for the gift of ships which you made
to Octavius against him as a matter of necessity, in order to procure
soldiers for the Parthian war in exchange, but he reminds you that those
soldiers were not sent. In short, Pompeius delivers himself to you with the
ships which he still has and his most faithful soldiers, who have not
abandoned him even in his flight. If peace is maintained, it will be a great
glory to you to have saved the son of Pompey the Great. In case of war, he
will be a considerable help to your party in the conflict which is coming,
unless, to be sure, it has already come.</q> </p>
</div><div n="136" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>When the ambassadors had thus spoken, Antony showed them the orders he had
sent to Titius, and said that if Pompeius was truly in this frame of mind he
should come in person under the escort of Titius. In the meantime, the
messengers who had been sent by Pompeius to the Parthians were captured by
Antony’s generals and brought to Alexandria. After Antony had examined each
of them he summoned the ambassadors of Pompeius and showed the captives to
them. They made excuses for Pompeius even then as a young man in a desperate
plight, fearful lest Antony should not treat him kindly, and driven by
necessity to make trial even of the bitterest enemies of Rome. They said
that he would show his true disposition as soon as he should learn Antony’s,
and would then need no other attempt or devices. Antony believed them, being
in other respects and at all times of a frank, magnanimous, and unsuspecting
nature. <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">Y.R&gt; 719</note>
</p>
</div><div n="137" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>In the meantime Furnius, who was governing the province of Asia for Antony,
had received Pompeius when he arrived, as he was behaving quietly; since
Furnius had not sufficient force to prevent him and did not yet know
Antony’s mind. Seeing Pompeius drilling his troops, he <note anchored="true" resp="HW" place="marg">B.C. <date when="-0035">35</date></note> mustered
a force from the provincials and hastily summoned Ahenobarbus, who had
command of an army in the vicinity, and also Amyntas from the other side.
They responded promptly, and Pompeius complained against Furnius for
regarding him in the light of an enemy when he had sent ambassadors to
Antony and was waiting for an answer from him. While he was saying this he
was meditating the project of seizing Ahenobarbus, with the connivance of
Curius, one of Ahenobarbus’ officers, intending to hold that general as a
valuable hostage to exchange for himself in case of need. The treachery was
discovered and Curius was convicted before the Romans present and put to
death. Pompeius put to death his freedman Theodorus, the only person who was
privy to the plan, believing that he had divulged it. As he no longer
expected to conceal his projects from Furnius, he possessed himself of
Lampsacus by treachery, a city which contained many Italians, colonized
there by Gaius Caesar. These Italians he induced to enter his
military service by large bounties. Having now 200 horse and three legions
of infantry, he attacked Cyzicus by land and sea. He was repulsed on both
sides, because there was a force, although not a large one, in Cyzicus, that
was guarding some gladiators whom Antony supported there. So Pompeius
retired to the harbor of the Achaeans and collected provisions. </p>
</div><div n="138" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Furnius did not begin hostilities, but he continually camped alongside of
Pompeius with a large body of horse and prevented his foe from foraging or
winning the cities to his side. As Pompeius had no cavalry, he assaulted the
camp of Furnius in front and, at the same time, sent a force secretly around
to his rear. Furnius accordingly directed his forces against Pompeius’ front
attack, but he was driven out of his camp by the force in his rear. Pompeius
pursued his men and killed many as they fled over the Scamandrian plain,
which was saturated with recent rains. Those who were saved withdrew to a
place of safety, as they were not fit for battle. While they were waiting
for assistance from Mysia, the Propontis, and elsewhere, the inhabitants,
who were distressed by continual exactions, enlisted gladly under Pompeius,
especially on account of the reputation he had gained by his victory at the
harbor of the Achaeans. While Pompeius was deficient in cavalry,
and was thus crippled in procuring supplies, he learned that a troop of
Italian horse was coming to Antony, sent by Octavia, who was passing the
winter in Athens. So he sent emissaries with gold to corrupt this troop, but
Antony’s governor of Macedonia caught these men and distributed their gold
to the cavalry. </p>
</div><div n="139" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompeius took Nicaea and Nicomedia, from which he obtained large
supplies of money, and his strength was augmented in all respects with a
rapidity that exceeded his expectations. But Furnius, who was camping not
far away from him, was reënforced, at the beginning of spring,
first with seventy ships that had come from Sicily, which had been saved
from those that Antony had lent to Octavius against Pompeius; for after the
close of the war in Sicily Octavius had dismissed them. Then Titius arrived
from Syria with 120 additional ships and a large army; and all these had
landed at Proconnesus. Pompeius became alarmed and burned his own ships and
armed his oarsmen, believing that he could fight to better advantage with
all of his forces combined on land. Cassius of Parma, Nasidius, Saturninus,
Thermus, Antistius, and the other distinguished men of his party who were
still with him as friends, and Fannius, who held the highest rank of all,
and Pompeius’ father-in-law, Libo, when they saw that he did not desist from
war against superior forces even after Titius, to whom Antony had given
entire charge, had arrived, despaired of him, and, having made terms for
themselves, went over to Antony. </p>
</div><div n="140" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompeius, now deserted by his friends, withdrew to the interior of Bithynia,
being reported as making his way to Armenia. One night as he marched out of
his camp quietly, Furnius and Titius followed him, and Amyntas joined in the
pursuit. After a hot chase they came up with him toward evening, and each
encamped by himself around a certain hill without ditch or palisade, as it
was late and they were tired. While they were in this state, Pompeius made a
night attack with 300 light troops and killed many who were still asleep or
springing out of bed. The rest took to disgraceful flight in a state of
nudity. It is evident that if Pompeius had made this night attack with his
entire army, or if he had followed up energetically the victory he did win,
he would have overcome them completely. But, misled by a god, he gave no
heed to these opportunities, and he gained no other advantage from the
affair than to penetrate farther into the interior of the country. His
enemies, having formed a junction, followed him and cut off his supplies,
until he was in danger from want. Then he sought an interview with Furnius,
who had been a friend of Pompey the Great, and who was of higher rank and of
a more trustworthy character than the others. </p>
</div><div n="141" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Taking a position where a river flowed between them, Pompeius said that he
had sent ambassadors to Antony, and he added that, being in need of
provisions meanwhile, and nobody supplying him, he had done what he had
done. <q rend="double">If you have fought against me,</q> he continued, <q rend="double">by Antony’s direction,
Antony has misconceived his own interests in not foreseeing the coming war.
If you are anticipating Antony’s intentions, I protest and implore you to
wait for the embassy that I sent to Antony or to take and bring me to him
now. I will surrender myself to you alone, Furnius, asking merely your
pledge that you will conduct me to him in safety.</q> He spoke thus because he
had confidence in Antony as a man of generous nature, and he apprehended
merely that something might happen to him on the journey. Furnius replied to
him as follows: <q rend="double">If you wished to surrender yourself to Antony you ought to
have done so in the beginning, or else have waited quietly at Mitylene for
his answer. But if you desired the war you should have done as you have
done. Why is it necessary to recount your deeds to one who knows them? If
now you repent, do not bring us, generals, into collision with each other,
but surrender yourself to Titius, to whom these matters have been intrusted
by Antony. The pledge which you ask from me you can ask from him. He has
been ordered by Antony to put you to death if you wage war, but, if you
surrender yourself, to send you to him in an honorable manner.</q> </p>
</div><div n="142" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Pompeius was angry with Titius as an ingrate, in that he undertook to wage
this war against him, for he had once been taken prisoner and spared by
Pompeius. Besides being angry he considered it beneath his dignity to be in
the power of Titius, who was not of noble birth. Moreover he suspected
Titius, either because he was acquainted with his character and did not
consider him trustworthy, or because he was conscious of some old injury
done to him previous to the benefaction above mentioned. Again he offered to
surrender himself to Furnius, and begged that he would receive him. When the
latter refused he said that he would surrender to Amyntas. Furnius said that
Amyntas would not receive him, because that would be an insult to the one
whom Antony had intrusted with this whole business; and so the interview
ended. The opinion prevailed in the camp of Furnius that, for want of other
resources, Pompeius would deliver himself up to Titius on the following day.
When night came Pompeius left the customary fires burning, and the trumpets
giving the usual signal at intervals through the night, while he quietly
withdrew from the camp with a well-prepared band, who had not been
previously advised whither they were to go. He intended to go to the
sea-shore and burn Titius’ fleet, and perhaps would have done so had not
Scaurus deserted from him and communicated the fact of his departure and the
road he had taken, although ignorant of his design. Amyntas, with 1500 horse, pursued Pompeius, who had no cavalry.
When Amyntas drew near, Pompeius’ men passed over to him, some privately,
others openly. Pompeius, being almost entirely deserted and afraid of his
own men, surrendered himself to Amyntas without conditions, although he had
scorned to surrender to Titius with conditions. </p>
</div><div n="143" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Thus was Sextus Pompeius captured. He was the last remaining son of Pompey
the Great, and had been deprived of his father when very young and of his
brother while still a stripling. After their death he concealed himself for
a long time and practised robbery secretly in Spain until he had collected a
large following, because he made himself known as Pompey’s son. Then he
practised more open robbery. After the death of Gaius Caesar he
carried on war vigorously and collected a large army, together with ships
and money, took islands, became master of the western sea, brought famine
upon Italy, and compelled his enemies to make peace on such terms as he
chose. Of most importance was the aid that he rendered to the proscribed in
Rome exposed to utter destruction, rescuing many of the nobility who were,
at this later time, safe at home by means of him. But stricken with mental
aberration, he never pursued an aggressive policy against his foes, although
fortune offered him many opportunities; he only defended himself. After such
a career Pompeius was taken prisoner. </p>
</div><div n="144" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Titius brought Pompeius’ soldiers into Antony’s service and put Pompeius
himself to death at Miletus in the fortieth year of his age. This he did
either on his own account, angry at some former insult, and ungrateful for
the subsequent kindness, or in pursuance of Antony’s order. Some say that
Plancus, not Antony, gave this order. They think that Plancus, while
governing Syria, was authorized by letters to sign Antony’s name in cases of
urgency and to use his seal. Others think that it was written by Plancus
with Antony’s knowledge, but that the latter was ashamed to write it on
account of the name Pompeius, and because Cleopatra was favorable to him on
account of Pompey the Great. Still others think that Plancus, being
cognizant of these facts, took it upon himself to give the order as a matter
of precaution, lest Pompeius, with the coöperation of Cleopatra,
should breed dissension between Antony and Octavius.<note resp="translator"><foreign xml:lang="grc">φυλαξάμενον μὴ τὴν
  αἰτίαν Ἀντωνίου καὶ Καίσαρος ἐς ἀλλήλους διδῷ
  Πομπήϊος, καὶ Κλεοπάτρα Πομπηΐω συνεργοῦσα,
ἀναθρέψαιεν.</foreign> This sentence has given much trouble to
commentators. Schweighäuser rejected the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">διδῷ</foreign> altogether.</note>
</p>
</div><div n="145" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>After the death of Pompeius Antony made a new expedition to Armenia, and
Octavius made one against the Illyrians, who were plundering Italy, some of
whom had never been subject to the Romans, while others had revolted during
the civil wars. Since these Illyrian affairs are not very well known to me,
and are not of sufficient length to make a book by themselves, and have no
suitable place to be treated elsewhere, I have recorded them above
(beginning with the time when Illyria was acquired by the Romans and
bringing them down to the end), and added them to the history of the
neighboring Macedonia. </p>
</div></div>
</div>
<div n="fragments" type="textpart" subtype="book">
<head xml:lang="lat">FRAGMENTA</head>
<head>[At the end of Mendelssohn’s edition of Appian are twenty-four
<foreign xml:lang="lat">fragmenta,</foreign> only two of which are of sufficient length to
be worth translating. They are the following:—] </head>
 <div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
<head>CONCERNING REMUS AND ROMULUS<note resp="translator">This is a transcript, with slight variations, of the first of the
  Excerpta “Concerning the Kings.”</note></head>
<head>FROM THE COLLECTION OF MAX. TREU (<date when="1880">1880</date>)</head>
<div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>WHEN Troy was captured on the 8th day of the month of December,
Aeneas fled to Mount Ida, passing through the Achaeans,
who gave way to him as he was carrying off his household gods and his
family. Others say that it was not that pious sight that saved him, but that
Aeneas had often urged the barbarians to give Helen back to the
Achaeans. There, having collected a band of Phrygians,<note resp="translator">Mendelssohn considers the text
spurious down to this point.</note> he departed to Laurentum, and having
married Lavinia, the daughter of Latinus, king of the Aborigines, he built a
city and named it Lavinium after his wife. Three years later Latinus died,
and Aeneas succeeded to the kingdom, by virtue of his marriage
relationship, and gave the name of Latins to the Aborigines. Three years
later still, Mezentius, the king of the Rutuli, engaged in war with him
because Lavinia had been previously betrothed to himself, and
Aeneas was slain. </p>
</div><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>Ascanius then became king in his stead. Despising Lavinium as a paltry town,
Ascanius founded another under the Alban mount and named it Alba, which,
after it had held sway 300 years, the Romans destroyed, so that not even a
foundation was left. Silvius, the third in descent, succeeded Ascanius. Then
another Aeneas was the fourth, Latinus was the fifth, Capys the
sixth, Capetus the seventh, Tiberinus the eighth, Agrippa the ninth, Romulus
the tenth, Aventinus the eleventh, Procas the twelfth, and Numitor and
Amulius the thirteenth. </p>
</div><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The father of these left the kingdom to Numitor as the elder of the two. His
brother Amulius dispossessed him and became king. Amulius, fearing
vengeance, slew Egestus, Numitor’s son, while hunting, and being
apprehensive lest the sister of Egestus should bear children he made her a
vestal. She became pregnant, as she said, by Mars, while drawing water from
a fountain sacred to him, and gave birth to Remus and Romulus. Amulius
accordingly incarcerated her and gave the boys to be thrown into the Tiber,
which was at that time called the Thubris. The bearers took the boys to the
river. They were shepherds, and they placed the basket on the margin of the
water where the river was marshy. After they had gone away the water receded
and the babes were left on dry land, and a she-wolf stepped into the basket
and suckled them. Laurentia, the wife of the shepherd Faustulus . . . They
were reared to manhood in the practice of robbery, and Remus was captured
while raiding the estates of Numitor, and was brought before Amulius. </p>
</div><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="section">
<p>The latter sent him to his brother Numitor, as the one who had suffered the
robbery, to be condemned and punished. But Numitor, when he beheld the young
man and reckoned up the time when he was exposed and the other
circumstances, began to suspect the truth, and examined him closely as to
his bringing up. Romulus became alarmed, and learning from Faustulus the
facts concerning himself and his brother, and how his mother had been
incarcerated, collected a band of shepherds and with them attacked Amulius,
and, having killed him, proclaimed Numitor king of the Albans. Then they
built a city on the bank of the river by the side of which they had been
exposed and nourished, and where they had practised robbery after they had
grown up; and they named it Rome. It was previously called the Tetragon,
because its perimeter was sixteen stades, having four stades on each side.
</p>
</div></div>
 <div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="chapter">
  <div n="0" type="textpart" subtype="section">
   <head>CONCERNING THE DIVINATION OF THE ARABS</head>
<head>FROM THE SAME<note resp="translator">This fragment was
first published in the <title>Revue Archaeologique,</title> in
<date when="1869">1869</date>, by C. Miller, from a manuscript not
indicated. It appears from the following note of Mendelssohn (ii. 1)
that it was known to the monks of Mount Athos earlier: <q rend="double">As regards the
matter related to Graevius by a certain Greek named Jeremiah,
concerning various unpublished fragments of Appian, which have been
preserved on Mount Athos (see Burmann, <title>ep. syll.</title> vol. iv.
p. 69), he seems to have had in mind the fragment of the twenty-fourth
book, published by Miller and more lately by Treu.</q></note></head>
<p>[APPIAN says, at the end of his twenty-fourth book:] While I was once fleeing
from the Jews, during the war that occurred in Egypt, and was passing
through Arabia Petraea to a river where a small boat was waiting to
convey me to Pelusium, an Arab was conducting me on my journey by night, and
as I thought we were nearing the boat, a raven croaked, just before dawn,
and the Arab exclaimed, in alarm, <q rend="double">We have lost our way.</q> Again the raven
croaked, and he said, <q rend="double">We are lost completely.</q> While I was troubled and was
looking around for a guide, but could find none (as it was still very early
in the morning and in a hostile country), the Arab heard the bird a third
time, and joyfully exclaimed, <q rend="double">We are lost for our own good, and we shall
find our road.</q> I smiled at the idea of our finding our lost road and gave
myself up to despair, being surrounded by enemies on all sides and unable to
turn back on account of those behind me, to escape whom I had come hither.
And so, for want of any other resource, I followed, surrendering myself to
the oracle. While I was in this condition another river appeared
unexpectedly, one very near to Pelusium, and also a trireme bound for that
place, in which I embarked and was saved. The small boat that was waiting
for me in the other river was captured by the Jews. So remarkable was the
good fortune that I enjoyed and so great was my astonishment at the oracle.
These men are very religious, they are skilled in the art of divination,
they are tillers of the soil, and they understand the use of drugs. It is
probable that, finding good land in Egypt (being agriculturists), and a race
like themselves devoted to religion, practising divination, and not
inexperienced in drugs and astrology, they were pleased to abide there as
among people of like habits with themselves. </p></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>