Lex repetundarum / Tabula Bembina — 123 BCE — edition — quoi socium nominisue Latini exter arumue nationum, quoiue in arbitratu dicione potestate amicitiaue populi Romani — — ab eo quei dictator, consul, praetor, magister equitum, censor, aidilis, tribunus plebis, quaestor, Illuir capitalis, niuir agreis dandeis adsignandeis, tribunus militum legionibus quattuor primis aliqua earum fu erit, queiue filius eorum quoius erit, quoius pater senator siet, in annos singolos pequniae qu — quod ipsei parenteiue suo filioue suo, quoiue ipsei parensue suos filiusue su os heres siet, ablatum captum coactum conciliatum auersumue siet, de ea re eius petitio nominisque delatio esto, praetoris quaestio esto, ioudicium ioudicatio leitisque aestumatio, queiquomque ioudices ex hace lege erunt, eorum hace lege esto — — sei quis praetori satis fecerit a rege populoue ceiueue suo se legatujm esse utei peteret, de ea re eius petiti o nominisque delatio esto, praetoris quaestio esto, ioudicium ioudicatio leitisque aestumatio, queiquomque ioudices ex hace lege erunt, eorum hace lege esto — —s iu— quei eorum postea aduersus hance legem fecerit quam ea res iudjicata erit, aut quoius nomen pr aeuaricationis caussa delatum erit, aut quoium nomen ex hace lege ex reis exemptum erit, sei quis eius nomen ad praetorem, quei ex hace lege quaeret, denuo detulerit, praetoris quaestio esto, ioudicium ioudicatio leitisque aestumati eorum hace lege esto. — alieno nomine petet — quaestio eius praetoris esto, ioudiciumque io udicatio litisque aestumatio, queiquomque ioudices ex hace lege erunt, eorum hace lege esto. is eum unde petet in ious ed[ucito ad praetorem, quoius ex hace lege in eum annum quaestio erit, ante kalendas Septembres, quae eo an — deque eo homine de— quoius eorum ita nomen ex hace lege post kalendas Septembres, quae eo anno fuerint, delatum erit, quei eorum eo ioudicio condemnatus erit, quanti eius rei slis aestumata erit, tantam pequniam — eaque pequnia, quei petiuerit, eius esto. praetor, quei ex hace lege quaeret, facito — quantum ita aestumatum erit, id utei priuato soluatur, quei eorum petet. vvv de heisce, dum magistratum aut inperium habebunt, ioudicium non fiet. w dictator, consul, praetor, magister equitum, [censor, aidilis, tribunus plebis, nei esto. quei eorum ex eo magistratu inperioue abierit, quo minus de eo ioudicium — fiat, eius hace lege nihilum rogatur. vacat de patrono dando. vacat quei ex hace lege pequniam petet nomenque detulerit, quoius eorum ex hace lege ante kalendas Septembres petitio erit, sei eis uolet sibei patronos in earn rem darei, p gnatos dato, dum nei quern eorum det sciens dolo malo quoiei is, quoius nomen detulerit, gener socer uitricus priuignusue 'siet, queiue ei sobrinus siet propiusue eum ea cognatione atingat, queiue eiei sodalis siet, queiue in eodem v conlegio siet, quoiaue in fide is erit maioresue in maiorum fide fuerint, [queiue in fide eius erit, m — quaestioneue ioudicioque puplico condemnatus siet, quod circa eum in senatum legei non liceat, neiue eum det quei ex hace lege ioudex in earn rem erit, neiue eum quei ex hace lege patronus datus erit. v v v de patrono repudiando. v v v v quei ex hace lege patronus datus erit, sei is mora[m fecerit ei, quei petet, quo minus i eius locum praetor, quei ex hace lege quaeret, alium patronum eiei quei in earn rem sibei darei postulabit dato. vacat de (quadringentis quinquaginta) uireis in hunc annum legundis. vv praetor, quei inter peregrinos ious deicet, is in diebus decern proxumeis, quibus hance legem populus plebesue iouserit, facito utei (quadringent III uirum agris dandis adsignandis siet fueritue, queiue in senatu siet fuerintue, queiue mercedem ceperit quaestioneue ioudicioque puplico condemnatus siet quod circa eum in senatum legei non liceat, queiue minor anneis triginta maiorue annos sexaginta gnatus siet, queiue in urbem Romam propiusue u[rbem Romam passus mille dom mare erit; quos legerit, eos, patrem tribunum cognomenque, ioudices quei ex hace lege in hunc annum sient — quei ex hace lege (quadringentei quinquaginta) uireifs) in eum annum lectei erunt, ea nomina om nia in tabula in albo, atramento scriptos, patrem tribum cognomenque tributimque discriptos hab[eto, eosque propositos s u o . quos ex hace lege (quadringentos quinquaginta) uiros legerit, facito recitentur in contione, iuratoque sese eos ex hace lege legise, de quibus sibei consultum utei idonei sient. ioudices exaestumauerit esse, eosque (quadringentos quinquaginta) uiros, quos ex hace lege l egerit, is praetor omnis in taboleis puplicis scriptos in per quisque eorum eum magistratum coiperit, facito utei (quadringentos quinquaginta) uiros ita legat, quei hac ceiuitate —, dum ne quern eorum legat, quei tribunus plebis, quaestor, Eluir capitalis, tribunus militum legionibus UU/l primis aliqua earum, trium uirum agris dandis adsignandis siet fueritue, queiue in senatu siet maior annos sexaginta gnatus siet queiue in urbe Romae propiusue urbem Romam passus mille domicilium non habeat, queiue eorum quoius magistratuum, queiue eius, quei in senatu siet fueritue, pater frater filiusue sie f queiue trans mare erit; quos legerit, eos, patrem tribum cognomenque, ioudices quei ex hace lege in eu[m annum sient patrem tribum cognomenque tributimque discriptos habeto, eosque propositos suo magistratu — habeto potestatemque scribundi, quei uolet, facito. praetor quei legerit, is eos, quos ex hace lege CDL uiros legerint, facito in con[c]tione recitentur, iouratoque sese eos ex hace lege legise, de quibus sibei consu[ltum utei idonei vacaf w de nomine deferundo iudicibusque legundeis. vvv quei ex hace lege pequniam ab altero ante kalendas Septembres petet, is eum, ubei (quadringenti quinquaginta) uirei in eum annum lectei erunt, ad iudicem, in eum annum quei ex hace lege factus erit, in ious educito nomenque eius deferto. sei deiurauerit calumniae causa non po receperit de (quadringentis quinquaginta) uireis, quei in eum annum ex hace lege lectei erunt, aruorsario edat eos omnes quoi is gener socer uitricus priuignusue siet, queiue ei sobrinus siet propiusue eum ea cognationem attingat, queiue ei sodalis siet, queiue in eodem conlegio siet, facitoque coram aru[orsario iouret palam apud se — s quae supra scripta sient non attigeret, scientem dolo malo; itaque is edito iouratoque. ubei is ita ediderit, turn in eam rem praetor, quei ita nomen alterius ex hace lege detulerit, facito utei is die uicensumo ex eo die quo quoiusque quisque nomen detolerit, centum uiros ex eis, quei ex hace lege (quadringenti quinquaginta utei ioudex siet, quoi is queiue ei, quei petet, gener socer uitricus priuignusue siet, queiue ei sobrinussiet propiusue eum ea cognatione atingat, queiue ei sodalis siet, queiue tribunus plebis, quaestor, Illuir capitalis, Illuir agris d(andis adsignandis, tribunus militum legionibus quattuor primis aliquae earum siet caussa aberit queiue trans mare erit, neiue amplius de una familia unum.neiue eum quei condemnatus siet, quod cum eo lege Calpurnia aut lege Iunia sacramento actum siet aut quod hace lege nomen delatum siet. quos is centum uiros ex hace lege ediderit, de eis ita facito iouret palam apud se coram p[opulo — nullum se edidise sciente earum qua necesitudine atingat, quae supra scripta sient. fqf unde petitum erit, quo minus —. ubei is, quei petet, ita centum uiros ediderit iuraritque, turn eis praetor facito utei is, unde petetur, die LX ex eo die quo eius nomen delatum erit, quos centum is quei petet ex hace lege ediderit, de eis iudices, q[uos uolet, (quinquagi is, quoius nomen ex hace lege delatum erit, quinquaginta iudices ex hace lege non legerit edideritue, seiue eum, quei se earum qua adfinitate cognatione sodalitate atingat, queiue in eodem conlegio siet, ex hace lege non ediderit, quod per eum praetorem aduorsariumue moram non erit, quo minus legat edatufe iudices, quos uolet, (qu sciens dolo malo ioudicem legat. quei ita lectei erunt, eis in earn rem ioudices sunto, eorumque eius rei ex hace lege ioudicium esto. vac nomina utei scripta in taboleis habeantur. vvv praetor, quei ex hace lege quaeret, facito eos quinquaginta uiros, quos is quei petet et unde petetur ex hace lege legerint ediderint eo — ea nomina, quei petiuerit et unde petitum erit, quei eorum uolet, ex taboleis popliceis — is praetor potestatem scribundi facito. v v eisdem ioudices unius rei in perpetuom sient. vv quei iudices ex hace lege lectei erunt, quam in rem eis iudices lectei erunt eius rei iudices in perpetuom sunto — — quei pequniam ex hace lege capjet, eum ob earn rem, quod pequniam ex hace lege ceperit, nei quis censor post hance legem rogatam tribu moueto neiue equom adimito neiue quid ei ei ob earn rem fraudei esto. vvvv — scripta sient. vv praetor, quei ex.hace lege +— vac de ioudicio in eum quei mortuos erit aut in exilium abierit. vac cmoium nomen ex hace lege delatum erit, sei is ante mortuos erit aut in exilium abierit quam ea res iudicata erit, praetor, ad quern eius nomen delatum erit, eam rem ab eis item quaerito,[ quei ioudices ex hace lege erunt, quasei sei is, quoius nomen ex hace lege delatum eri = 47 + vacat, A - B = 32, B praetor, quei ex hace lege quaeret, ei, quoium nomen ex hface) Kege) ad se delatum erit, facito utei ioudicium palam denuntietur quo die futurum siet, utei quod recte factum esse uolet, dum nei quid aduorsus hance legem fiat ad moram faciundam; neiue post hance Qegem rogatam — — iubetoque conquaeri in terra Italia in oppedeis foreis conciliaboleis — in oppedeis foreis conciliaboleis, ubei ioure deicundo praesse solent; in quibus diebus c- 8 praetor, quei ex hace lege quaereft, conquaeri iouserit — vac de testibus vac denuntiando. quei ex hace lege nomen detulerit, praetor, quei ex hace lege quaeret, ubei audierit quod eius rei quaerundai censeant refere et causam nouerit, testibus dumtaxat duodequinquaginta denuntiare iubeto et, quom ea res agetur, quam in rem quisque testis erit, in earn rem facito omnes adsient testimo[niumque deicant, dum nei quern testimonium deicere iubeat, quei — quoiau unde petetur, siet maioresue in major)um eius fide fuerint. queiue in fide eius siet maioresue in maiorum eius fide fuerint, queiue eius causam deicet, dumtaxat unum, queiue eeius parentisue eius leibertus leibertaue siet. vvvv de taboleis —. vac — nomina eorum quos ad testimonium deicendum appellarilt secumue duxerit dumtaxat homines IIL earum refrum causa, de quibus id ioudicium fiet, eaque omnia, quai ita conquaesiuerit, et sei qua tabulas libros leiterasue popflicas preiuatasue poscere proferreque uolet, ad praetorem deferto — — seiue de ea re uolet apud prfaetorem\ is praetor ei moram ne facfito quo minus —rat. w w v v v praetor utei interroget. vvvvvvv praetor, quei ex hace lege quaeret — vac ioudices utei iourent antequam considant. vac praetor, quei ex hace lege quaeret, quei in eam rem ioudices erunt. antequam primum caussa dfeicetur — apud se iourent facito. iudices, quei in earn rem erunt, omnes pro rostreis in forum uorsus iouranto — facturumque se, utei quod recte factum esse uo")let utei testium. quei in earn rem erunt. uerba audiat — neque se facturum quo earn rem minus ioudicet, nisei sei quae causa erit, quae eiei — quei ita apud se iourarint, eorum nomina is praetor facito in contione rjecitentur. proscripta propositaque palam apud forlum. ubei de piano recte legi possitur, habeto, quei ex eis centum ioudicis quinquaginta lectei erunt. vvvvvvvv ioudex nei quis dispute t vv— — quo minus —e judicium adesse possit. de ea re praetori, quei ex hac|e lege quaeret, cognoscendi ius esto. vac de proferendo. vvvv quam rem praetor ex hace lege egerit, sei earn rem profe r et, quoius ex hace lege nomen delatum erit — —re potent, facito quoius deicet nomen referre —it, utei is ad sese ueniat aut adferatur, coram eo que i postulauerit — — sei uojlet. quoius ex hface") Ifege) 6ik>minis delatio erit. ei eius rei pertitio esto — deque ea re hace lege iudicium litisque aestumatio essto quasei sei eius — — sei ioudex, quei earn rem quaeret. ex hface) Kege) causam non nouerfit. praetor quei ex hace lege quaeret — coram iudicibus in contione pro rostris sente ntia<m) ita pronontiato: fecisse — — sei iudicium fieri oportebit. terftio die — sei ioudex, quei earn rem quaeret, ex hace lege causam non nouerit, praetor quei ex hace lege quaeret — vac ioudices utei iourent antequam in consilium eant. vac praetor, quei ex hace lege quaeret, ioudices, quei ex hace lege in earn rem erunt, in consilium antequam ibunt facito iurent sese. quern iam sibei — neque facturum quo quis suae alteri us sententiae certior siet, quod per dolum malum fiat — —laturum esse. vac iudic e i multam suprema deicatur. vac — sei ioudex, quei earn rem quaeret, causam non nouerit, quei eorum ioudex — — sine reculsatione primo qu o que die deferatur, isque quaestor — vac iudices in consiliu m quo modo eant. vvv praetor, quei ex hace lege iudicium exercebit — — sei pars plus una iudicum, quei aderunt, se non posse iud i care deixerit, praetor, quei ex hace lege quaeret, ita pronontiato: amplius — eorum iudicum, queiquomque aderunt, iudicare iubeto — — eis iudicibus, quei amplius bis negarint iudicare, is sestertium nummum (decern milia), quotiensquomque amplius bis in uno iudicio iudicare negarint — multam deicito — tum quam ob rem et quantum pequniae multam deixerit — — vac de reis quo modo iudicetur. vac ubei duae partes iudicum, quei aderunt, sibei liquere deixerint — turn praetor, quei ex hace lege quaeret, facito utei eis iudices, quei iudicare negarint, semouantur, — — eam rem agito. turn praetor quom soueis uiatoribus apparitoribusque nei exeant facito et sitellam u— altam digitos ??? latam digitos ???XX quo ioudices sorticolas conieciantin tribunali poni iubeto — —to eique iudicifs} is praetor sorticolam unam buxeam longam digitos quattuor latam digitos ??? scriptam atramento, ex altera parti A, ex altera parti C, in manu palam dato alteramque, utram uelit, litteram eum ioudicem inducere iubeto — iudex ita inducito eamque sortem ex hace lege apertam bracioque aperto litteram digiteis opertam palam in earn sitellam coicito deque tribunali descendito; itemque in eos ceteros singilatim iudices — vac sententiae quo modo pronontientur. vac quei E d g e - E = 16, iudex sortis tolundai causa ad sitellam sorti ueniet, is in earn sitellam manum demitito et earn deuexam populo palam ostendito, nei quid lateat occultum, quamque in id iudi cium sententiamea sors habuerit, is exea sorti — palam pronontiato, ubei A littera scripta erit, absoluo, ubei C littera scripta erit, condemno, ubei nihil scriptum erit, seine sufragio. ex qua sorti pronontiarit, earn sortem proxumo iudfici reddito, isque deincefps earn sortem praetori transdito. vvvwv d e r eo_apsoluendo. vac quoius ex hace lege nomen delatum erit — nisei de eo sententiae ibei plurumae erunt, condemno, quod praeuaricationis causa factum non erit, is ex hace lege eius rei apsolutus esto. vac de reo condemnando. vac sei de eo reo sententiae ibei plurumae erunt, condemno, praetor, quei ex hace lege quaeret, eum reum pronontiato fecisse uideri — sei is ex hace lege condemnatus aut apsolutus erit, quom eo hace lege, nisei quod postea fecerit aut nisei quod praeuaricationis causa factum erit aut nisei de leitibus aestumandis aut nisei de sanctioni hoiusce legis, actio nei esto. — vac de praedibus dandis bonisue possidendis. vac praetor, quei earn rem quaesierit, eum, quei ex hace lege condemnatus erit, quaestorei praedes facito det de consili maioris partis sententia, quanti eis censuerint. sei ita praedes datei non erunt, bona eius facito puplice possideantur conqfuaerantur — quaestorei scriptum transdito, quaestor accipito et in taboleis pobliceis scriptum habeto. vac de leitibus aestumandis. vacvac q ue j e xhac(e> lege condemnatus erit, ab eo quod quisque petet, quoius ex hace lege peti[tio erit, id praetor, quei earn rem quaesierit, eos iudices, quei earn rem iudicauerint, aestumare iubeto — quod ante hance legem rogata ablatum auorsum conciliatumue esse, eas res omnis simpli, ceteras res omnis quod post hance legem rogatam conperietur captum coactum ablatum auorsum conciliatumue esse dupli, idque ad qua[estorem, quantum siet quoiusque nomine ea lis aestumata siet, facito deferatur. vac de pequnia ex aerario soluenda. vac quei iudicei, quei earn rem quaesi suo parentisue suei quoiue ipse parensue suos heres siet lei tern aestumatam esse, queiue eiei iudicei consilioque eius maiorei parti ita satis fecerit regis populeiue ceiuisue suei nomine litem aestumatam esse sibei, quanta ea pecunia erit -T- quae — ex hace lege in aerario posita erit, ob earn rem, quod eo nomine lis aestumata erit, in triduo proxsumo, quo ita satis factum erit, ex hace lege soluatur; neiue quis iudex neiue quaestor facito sciens dolo m[alo, quo minus ita satis fiat itaque soluatur — vac de tributo indicendo. vac quanti iudex, quei earn rem quaesierit, leites aestumauerit, iudex ex hace lege pequniam omnem ad quaestorem redigere non potuerit, turn in diebus decern proxsumeis, quibus quanta potuerit redacta erit, iudex quei earn rem quaesierit, queiue iudex ex hace lege fac[tus erit, turn cum ea pequnia redacta erit tributum indicito — diemque edito, qua is adsiet quoius parentisue quoius eiusue quoi ipse parens aestumatae erunt, aut quoius regis populeiue nomine lis aestumata erit legatei adessint, dum nei longius centum dies edat. vac de tributo seruando vvvvvv ubei ea dies uenerit, quo die iusei erunt adesse, iudex, quei e[um tributum indixerit, quanta pequnia de eius, quei ex hace lege condemnatus erit, bonis redacta erit, tantam pequniam p satis fecerit, ei primo quoque die quaestorem soluere iubeto, quaestorque earn pequniam eis sed fraude sua soluito. vac reliquom in aerario siet. vvvvvv quod eorum nomine, quei non aderit, tributus factus erit, quaestor in aerario seruato — vac de vac tribute proscribendo. queiquomque praetor ex hace lege tribuendei caussa prodeixerit, is, uti quod recte factum esse uolet, facito, quo modo prodeixerit, ea omnia maiore parte diei ad earn diem, donee solutum erit, apud forum palam ubei de piano recte legi possitur, proscripta propositaque habeat — praetor, quei eum tributum fecerit, dies ??? proxsumos, ex ea die, qua tributus factus erit, apud forum palam ubci de piano recte legi possitur, proscribito. vac pequnia post quinquenium populei fiet. vvvvv quae pequnia ex hace lege in aerarium posita erit, quod in anneis qufinque proxsumeis ex ea die, qua tributus factus erit, quaestor ex hace lege non soluerit, populei eandem prouinciam habebit, eis faciunto, utei quod recte factum esse uolet, quod eius is reus non soluerit, ab eis praedibus primo quoque die pequnia exigatur. wwvvw pequnia in fiscis opsignetur. w v v quaequomque pequnia ex hace lege ad q[uaestorem redacta erit, is quaestor ea pequnia facito in fiscis siet fiscique signo suo opsignentur — sing quis praetor litis ae stumauerit et unde ea pequnia redacta siet quantumque in eo fisco siet. quaestor, quiquomque erit, utei quod recte factum esse uolet, facito in diebus quinque proxumeis quibusquomque eiei aerarium prouincia obuenerit — quoi pequniam ex hace lege, quod sine malo pequlatuu fiat, praetor quei ex hace lege quaeret, darei solui iuserit, id quaestor, quei aerarium prouinciam optinebit, sed fraude sua extra ordinem dato soluitoque. vvvv quaestor moram nei facito. yvvv quaestor — vac iudicium nei quis impediat. vac quod ex hace lege iudicium fie r i oportebit, quom ex hace lege fieri oportebit, nei quis magistratus proue magistratu proue quo inperio inpediunto quo minus setiusue fiat iudiceturue, neiue quis eum, quei ex hace lege iudicium exercebit, neiue eum, que[i ex hace lege iudicabit neiue eum quei ex hace lege petet neiue eum unde petetur — a auocarier iubeto, neiue ab ducito neiue abducier iubeto, neiue facito quo quis eorum minus ad id iudicium adesse possit, neiue facito quo minus iudici uerba audeire, in consilium eire, iudicare liceat, neiue iudicium dimitere iubeto, nisei quom senatus iourc uocabitur — aut nisei quom centuriae aut tribus intro uocabuntur, ex tra quam sei quid in saturam feretur. vac sei is praetor, quei ex hace lege quaeret, seiue is quaestor quoi aerarium uel urbana prouincia obuenerit, (eo magistratu) ioudicioue inperioue abierit abdicauerit mortuosue erit, antequam ea omnia ioudica[ta soluta factaue erunt, quod ex hace lege fieri oportebit, queiquomqu See below for the beginning of the line. sej j s pra etor, quei ex hace lege quaeret, seiue is quaestor, quoi aerarium uel urbana prouincia obuenerit, eo magistrate iudicioue inperioue abierit abdicaueritu[e mortuosue erit, antequam ea omnia ioudicata soluta factaue erunt, quod ex hace lege fieri oportebit, queiquomque praetor ex hace lege quae = 364 + vacatx2 esse uolet, facito utei ea omnia, quod ex hace lege factum non erit, faciant fiantque, quae ex hace lege fieri oporteret, sei apud eum ea res acta esset, deque ea re eiei praetori quaestorique omnium rerum, quod ex hace lege factum non erit, siremps lex esto, qua[sei sei apud eum ea res acta esset — vac de rebus ex lege Calpurnia Iuniaue iudica prouinciam habebit, is, utei quod recte factum esse ujolet, facito utei ea omnia, quod ex hace lege factum non erit, faciant fiantque, quae ex hace lege fieri oporteret sei apud eum ea res acta esset, deque ea re eiei praetori quaestorique omnium rerum, quod ex hace lege factum non erit, siremps lex esto, quasei sei apud eum ea res acta esset — fuit fueritue ex lege quam L. Cal purnius L.f. tribunus plebis rogauit, exue lege quam M. Iunius D.f. tribunus plebis rogauit, quei eorum eo ioudicio condemnatus est eritue, quo magis de ea re eius nomen vv hace lege deferatur{um), quoue magistratusis de ea re quom [eo ex hace lege agatur, eius hace lege nihilum rogatur. nRubricn qu iudicium fuit fueritue ex lege quam L. Calpurnius L.f. tribunus plebei rogauit, exue lege quam M. Iunius D.f. tribunus plebei rogauit, quei eorum eo ioudicio condemnatus est eritue, quo magis de ea re eius nomen hace lege deferatur quoue magis de e[a re quom eo ex hace lege agatur, eius hace lege nihilum rogatur. ^Rubric) queiquomque adue erit, quom eis hace lege actio nei esto. vvv vac de praeuaricatione. vac praetor, quei ex hace lege quaeret, qua de re ei praetori eisque ioudicibus, quei ex hace lege ad earn rem ioudicandam adfuerint, quei uiuent, eorum maiorei partis satis factum erit, nomen, quod ex hace lege quis detulerit, pracuaricationis causa eum detulisse — = 92 + vacat x 2, E - D = 44, iouserit, antequam ea res facta erit, quom eis hace lege actio nei esto. vac de praeuaricatione. vac praetor, quei ex hace lege quaeret, qua de re ei praetori eisque ioudicibus, quei ex hace lege ad eam rem ioudicandam adfuerint, quei uiuent, eorum maiori{sj parti satis ffeceritf e[rit, nomen, quod ex hace lege quis detulerit, p de ceiuitate danda. sei quis eorum, quei ceiuis Romanus non erit, ex hace lege alteri nomen — ad praetorem, quoius ex hace lege quaestio erit, detolent, et is eo eo iudicio hace lege condemnatus erit, tu[m eis, quei eius nomen detolerint, quoius eorum opera maxume is quoius nomen delatum erit condemnatus erit, ipse ceiuis Romanus iustus esto ceiuis Romanus ex hace lege fiet, nepotesque dum eiei filio gnateis ceiueis Romanei iustei sunto inque eius tribum, quei ex hace lege condemnatus erit, sufragiujm ferunto, inque eam tribum censento, militiaeque eis uocatio esto, aera stipendiaque omnia eis merita sunto. nei qui magistratus proue magistratu — eius hace lege nihilum rogato. vvvvvvv de prouocatione uocationeque danda. vac sei quis eorum, quei ???ceiuis Romanus ex hace lege fieri nolet, quei eorum in ceiuitate Latina Iluir consul??? dictator w praetor aedilisue non fuerint, ad praetorem, quoius ex hace lege quaestio erit, ex hace lege alteri nomen detolerit et is eo iudicio hace lege cond = 25 + vacat, E - D = ???58???, eius militiae munerisque poplici in sua quoiusque ceiuitate iudex deinceps faciat propOSita Siet. vac See above for the end of the line. — sei petetur, de ea re eius optio esto, utrum uelit uel in sua ceiuitate uel Romae — — sed fraude sua inperio inhibere liceto. v v w v w w v quei ceiuis Romanus ex hace lege alterei nomen detolerit — — vvvv quoi ex hace lege militiae uocatio erit esseue oportebit — — praetor quei inter peregrinos ious deicet — —atei c—

Lex repetundarum / Tabula Bembina — 123 BCE — translation

Lex repetundarum / Tabula Bembina — 123 BCE — commentary

Full Latin text of the inscription per Crawford 1996. No explanatory preamble (LEX genre); operative clauses on the new standing extortion court — eligibility, procedure, witnesses, penalties.

For the slot-by-slot formula analysis see Formula Dossier case #15.

."Crawford 1996 (verbatim): "At any rate from the late second century BC onwards, the two styles seem to have been used in the distinct contexts characterised above, presumably by deliberate choice. The one case of an occurrence of the first style out of context is the first preserved chapter of the Lex Coloniae Genetiuae, Law 25, where we surely have a case of the copying of an earlier text, not the deliberate use by Caesar of an idiosyncratic style."For the formula dossier, this means the Republican Latin LEX genre uses the "fuller style" with characteristic doublets (

Crawford 1996 (p. 16, verbatim from the text-layer): "Note that Roman statutes do not have a prescript in the sense of an explanatory preamble, except for the Lex Gabinia Calpurnia, Law 22, and the Lex Clodia, Law 56. To turn to the characteristic style of Roman statutes, the Romans during the Republic produced legal texts in two very different styles, both deeply rooted in Latin literary style in general. There is first the austere style of the Twelve Tables, preserved in a modified form for the praetor's edict:

case study, complementing the five Roman SC case studies (#1 Bacchanalibus through #5 Asclepiade). The lex genre differs from the SC genre formally: per Crawford 1996 (verbatim above), Roman statutes "do not have a prescript in the sense of an explanatory preamble" — the SC's canonical four-part scheme (date / convening magistrate / witnesses to drafting / motion text) is absent. Instead the lex genre uses the "fuller style" with characteristic doublets, procedural-clause repetition, and tense cumulation.

All entries point to in-folder PDFs. Crawford 1996's own citations to other scholarship (Marouzeau, Volterra, Vine, Pascucci, Mommsen, Kaser, Daube, etc.) appear inside the verbatim commentary block in §2 but are not asserted as independently-verified bibliography per M18 policy.

). The case study presents Crawford's discussion verbatim; the substantive Latin text of the lex itself is not OCR-extracted (Crawford's Latin uses special fonts that pdftotext does not recover cleanly). Bibliography lists only in-folder files. No invented quotes.

The Roman LEX formula bundle differs from the SC bundle: per Crawford 1996 p. 16 (verbatim above), Roman statutes "do not have a prescript in the sense of an explanatory preamble". The slot vocabulary is therefore different from cases #1–#5 (SC genre).

Critical apparatus [— TR(IBVN???) PL. PLEBEM IOVRE ROGAV??? PLEBESQVE IOVRE SCI — [— TR(IBVN???) PL. PLEBEM IOVRE ROGAV??? PLEBESQVE IOVRE SCIVIT IN — A.D. — , TRIBVS — PRINCIPIVM FviT, PRO TRIBV — PREIMVS SCIVIT. — ] , Mommsen (1863); [ M \ ACILIVS? — TR(lBVNl) PL. PLEBEM IOVRE ROGAVERVNT PLEBESQVE IOVRE SCIVIT IN — A.D. — , TRIBVS — PRINCIPIVM FVIT, PRO TRIBV - LEX REPETVNDARVM 77 EOSQ — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 77 EOSQVE PROPOSITOS SVO MAG. HABETO, EORVMQVE, QVEI EX H.L. CDL VIREI IN EVM (presumably a mistake for HVNC) ANNVM LECTEI ERVNT — POTESTATEMQVE . . . ] , Lintott 5 - 1 6 [LEGVNDIS. PR. QVEI POST H.L. ROGATAM EX H.L. IOVDEX — 5 - 1 6 [LEGVNDIS. PR. QVEI POST H.L. ROGATAM EX H.L. IOVDEX FACTVS ERIT — IS IN DIEBVS . . . ] , Mommsen; [LEGVNDIS. — PR., QVEI POST HVNC ANNVM EX H.L. IOVDEX FACTVS ERIT, IS IN DIEBVS . . . ] , LintOtt - LEX REPETVNDARVM — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 79 - LEX REPETVNDARVM 81 — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 81 N E G A R E I V ] D I C A R E , Mommsen (1905); [— EIS IVDICIBVS, QVEI ITA N E G A R I N T Iv] DICARE, Lintott; [—] DICARE, Dupuy, Chacon; [—]DEICARE, Scaliger; [—]CARE, Peiresc IN VNO I V [ D I C I O IVDICARE NEGARINT — SINGV - LEX REPETVNDARVM — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 83 - LEX REPETVNDARVM 85 — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 85 TRANSLATION Although nomen deferre means literally 'to register the name (of someone)', we translate the phrase as 'to prosecute', because that is what is meant; and we translate cognate phrases along the same lines. 11. 1-3 [— from whomeve - LEX REPETVNDARVM 87 — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 87 jurors, and that praetor is to have all those 450 men whom he shall have chosen according to this statute written down in the public records to the end. 11. 15-18 Concerning [the selection of] 450 men every year. [The praetor, —, within the - LEX REPETVNDARVM 89 — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 89 11. 28-9 [Concerning the trial of a person who shall have died] or shall have gone into exile. Whoever shall have been prosecuted according to mis statute, [if he shall have died or] shall have gone [into exile before] that matter shall hav - LEX REPETVNDARVM 91 i — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 91 is to place that ballot visible according to this statute and with his arm uncovered, the letter covered with his fingers, openly [in that urn and he is to descend from the platform;] and likewise for those other jurors, one by one, [—] 11. - LEX REPETVNDARVM 93 — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 93 money has been collected and how much be in that basket. The quaestor, whoever [he shall be, as] he shall deem [it] proper, is to see that in the five days next after the treasury shall have fallen to him as his province [— to whomever] th - LEX REPETVNDARVM 95 COM — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 95 COMMENTARY 1. 1 Given that there are no good grounds for supposing that a normal prescript was engraved for our text (see the Introduction), the beginning may have run: Lex ??? de pecuniis repetundis. (First rubric) quoi nomen deferre liceat. - LEX REPETVNDARVM 97 (8 — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 97 (81-5); (3) singular relative clauses in Latin of the type, is quei petet, do not imply that there was only a single prosecutor (85-7). That is, however, not the end of the matter. As Mantovani observes, 97, in the cases of which we hear betw - LEX REPETVNDARVM 99 Ma — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 99 Mattingly's combination of the equestrian census and military service as an eques, as joint requirements (1975), is implausible: why should a legislator have wished to exclude men who had served as pedites, but possessed - or acquired - the e - LEX REPETVNDARVM 101 s — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 101 scripta sient, 1. 24, on the basis of which these words are restored here, since the words belong to what the legislator says, not to what the defendant swears. For sodalis and in eodem conlegio in 1. 20, see on 11. 9-11 above; for the begin - LEX REPETVNDARVM 103 c — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 103 cause definie par cette loi': it is unlikely that any Roman draftsman would have sown confusion in this way.) The most likely rubric at the end of 1. 28 is then [nomina utei sc]ripta sient. 11. 29-30 For iudicium in eum, compare the Lex agra - LEX REPETVNDARVM 10 — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 105 statute, if he shall postpone that matter, whoever [shall have been prosecuted according to this statute, whoever shall not be able to go for a pre-trial — whoever] shall be able [to go for a pre-trial for him,] he (the praetor) is to see - LEX REPETVNDARVM 107 — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 107 For the sanctio of a statute, see the General Introduction, Ch. XV; all details are lost here. 11. 56-8 For the taking of security or the seizure of property from a condemned man, compare Cicero, Rab.Post. 37; the Lex Latina Tabulae Bantina - LEX REPETVNDARVM 109 — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 109 immediately or whose money has become available late, the right to apply for immediate payment, outside the occasions of 11. 59-61 and 61-64. But the word pequlatus implies that it is the money of the res publica that is at stake and it ma - LEX REPETVNDARVM 111 re — - LEX REPETVNDARVM 111 restored, as observed by J.A. Crook in discussion. 'That son' is of course 'that son' already born when the primary beneficiary receives citizenship; and the sons of 'that son' acquire citizenship. Any sons born later to a beneficiary in the (QVEIVE) QVOIVS(VE) PATER, Klenze in commentary, Mommsen (18 — (QVEIVE) QVOIVS(VE) PATER, Klenze in commentary, Mommsen (1863); (QVEIVE IPSE VEL) QVOIVS PATER, Mommsen (1905); it is not certain that Chacon saw ampl[—] or the copyist of Sigonio ampli[—] 0 - 1 CORAM ARV[ORSARIO IS QVOIVS NOMEN DELATVM ERIT IOVRET, — 0 - 1 CORAM ARV[ORSARIO IS QVOIVS NOMEN DELATVM ERIT IOVRET, DE CDL VIREIS, QVEI IN EVM ANNVM EX H.L. LECTEI SIENT PRAETEREA NVLLVM ESSE NISEI QVEI SE EARVM ALIQVA NECESITVDINE QVAE S(VPRA) s(CRIPTA) s(lENT)] NON ATTIGERET, Mommsen (1863); CORAM ARV[ORSARIO IS QVEI ITA EDIDERIT IOVRET, IN CDL VIREIS 1 COVRATOQVE, aeS\ IN EA[M QVAESTIONEM QVEI QVOIVSQVE ITA NO — 1 COVRATOQVE, aeS\ IN EA[M QVAESTIONEM QVEI QVOIVSQVE ITA NOMEN DETOLERIT, is (is added 1905) PR. QVOIVS EX H.L. QVAESTIO E]RIT, Mommsen; IN E A [ — PR. EVM, QVEI ITA EX H.L. NOMEN ALTERivs DETOLE]RIT, Lintott; VIREI IN EVM, aes; contra Mommsen (1905); VIVAT, aes 1 - 2 E[DATQVE — DVM NET QVIS IOVD]EX SIET, Mommsen; E[DATQV — 1 - 2 E[DATQVE — DVM NET QVIS IOVD]EX SIET, Mommsen; E[DATQVE ARVORSARIO IOVDICES, QVOS VOLET — DVM NEI QVEM EORVM LEGAT, VTEI IOVD]EX SIET, LintOtt 7 8 - 9 (not refuted by Brassloff, 106 n. 3) — 7 8 - 9 (not refuted by Brassloff, 106 n. 3) - LEX AGRARIA — - LEX AGRARIA [— PRO INPERIO PROVE POTESTATE IPSEI REGIVE POPVLOVE IPSIVS — [— PRO INPERIO PROVE POTESTATE IPSEI REGIVE POPVLOVE IPSIVS PARENTIVE IPSIVS QVEIVE IN POTESTATE MANU MANCIPIO SVO PARENTISVE SVI SIET FVERIT QVO]IVE, Mommsen (1905); supp. Lintott; [—]OIVE, Gbttling: the first letter is not now visible; IPSEI PARENTEVE s v o s , VE above the line, aes, corr. Klenze 0 - 1 Supp. Mommsen: the interpunct at the end of 1. 30 is c — 0 - 1 Supp. Mommsen: the interpunct at the end of 1. 30 is clear 2 - 3 Supp. Mommsen (1905), very slightly adapting Mommsen ( — 2 - 3 Supp. Mommsen (1905), very slightly adapting Mommsen (1863) 3 - 4 Supp. Mommsen (1905), adapting Mommsen (1863), except — 3 - 4 Supp. Mommsen (1905), adapting Mommsen (1863), except for [—]QVEM IAM s[—], which is only in Peiresc and was unknown to Mommsen; FACIT IVRENT, Mazochi 5 - 6 [— AD AERARIVM — EXCVJSATIONE, Mommsen (1863, suppleme — 5 - 6 [— AD AERARIVM — EXCVJSATIONE, Mommsen (1863, supplement partly abandoned 1905); [—]OQVE DIE DEFERATVR ISQVE QVAESTOR[—], Peiresc: the first and last letters not in Dupuy, Scaliger, the first not in Chacon; Mazochi records the top of the o in Peiresc [— EIV]S I V [ D I C — ] or [— QV]OIV[S — ] , Mommsen with a — [— EIV]S I V [ D I C — ] or [— QV]OIV[S — ] , Mommsen with apparatus; [— QV]OIV[E — ] , Lintott in apparatus: s is more probable than o; [— DE QVO EX H.L. IOVDICATVM ERIT, SEI ( 1 9 0 5 , ET 1 8 6 3 ) CONTRA H.L. FECISSE DEICETVR, POSTQVAM EA RES IOVD]ICATA ERIT, Mommsen: the first letter is not now 1 - 2 Supp. Mommsen (1905) — 1 - 2 Supp. Mommsen (1905) 3 - 4 Supp. Mommsen — 3 - 4 Supp. Mommsen 4 - 5 Supp. Lintott, adapting Mommsen — 4 - 5 Supp. Lintott, adapting Mommsen 6 - 7 Rubric, supp. Mommsen (1905), adapting Mommsen (1863); — 6 - 7 Rubric, supp. Mommsen (1905), adapting Mommsen (1863); thereafter, [— IVDEX, QVEI EAM REM QVAESIERIT, EARVM RER]VM, M o m m s e n ; [— PR., QVEI EX H.L. QVAERET, E]VM, Lintott: see Hoffmann, Umgangsprachey 114; [ — ] M QVEI, Peiresc, Dupuy, Scaliger; [—]um quei, Chacon 57-8 C 9 - 6 0 Supp. M o m m s e n (1905), see also the Commentary — 9 - 6 0 Supp. M o m m s e n (1905), see also the Commentary on 11. 5 9 - 6 1 ; AD QVA[ESTOREM, QVEI AERARIVM PROVINCIAM OPTINEBIT. DEFERVNTO — QVEI EIEI IOVDICEI, CONSILIOQVE . . . ] , Lintott ENO or LNO is clear, followed by NOMIN: [— ALI]ENO NOMIN[E — — ENO or LNO is clear, followed by NOMIN: [— ALI]ENO NOMIN[E — ] , Mommsen (1863); [SEI Qvis ALI]ENO NOMIN[E — EX H.L. PETERE NOMENVE DEFERRE VOLET, DE EA RE EIVS PETITIO NOMINISQVE DELATIO ESTO], Mommsen (1905); [— ALI]ENO NOMIN[E — DE EA RE EIVS PETITIO NOMINISQVE DELATIO ESTO], Lintott IOVDICIVMVE - 7 Supp. Lintott, adapting Mommsen, cf. 1. 19 — - 7 Supp. Lintott, adapting Mommsen, cf. 1. 19 3 - 4 Supp. Crawford, adapting Mommsen (1905), adapting Momm — 3 - 4 Supp. Crawford, adapting Mommsen (1905), adapting Mommsen (1863) 4 - 5 Supp. Mommsen, [QVEI] replaced here by [QVEIQVOMQJVE, — 4 - 5 Supp. Mommsen, [QVEI] replaced here by [QVEIQVOMQJVE, in the gap between the E and C fragments; [—]VERO, followed by a caret mark to indicate that the bronze was illegible, followed by R EX HACE LEGE, Dupuy, Scaliger; [—] p{rae)tor ex hace lege, Chacon, correcting exH.L.\ [—]VE PRAETOR EX 5 - 6 Supp. Mommsen — 5 - 6 Supp. Mommsen 6 - 7 QVOD IN ANNEIS QV[lNQVE PROXSVMEIS EX EA DIE, QVA TRIB — 6 - 7 QVOD IN ANNEIS QV[lNQVE PROXSVMEIS EX EA DIE, QVA TRIBVTVS FACTVS ERIT, EIVS PEQVNIAE QVAESTOR EX H.L. NON SOLVERIT, POPVLEI ESTO. DE PEQVNIA A PRAEDIBVS EXIGENDA. QVAESTOR QVOI AERARIVM PROVINCIA OBVENERIT, QVOI QVAESTOREI EX H.L. PRAEDES DATEI ERVNT, QVEIVE QVAESTOR DEINCEPS,] M o m m s e n 7 - 8 Supp. Mommsen — 7 - 8 Supp. Mommsen 9 - 7 0 Supp. Mommsen — 9 - 7 0 Supp. Mommsen [— EIVS PR. SENTENTIA PETITO NOMENQVE EIVS DEFERTO. — [— EIVS PR. SENTENTIA PETITO NOMENQVE EIVS DEFERTO. POST K. SEPT. QVOD NOMEN DEFERETVR, SEI IS QVEI PETET VOLET, IS PR. DE EA RE IOVDICIVM RECVPERATORIVM DATO. QV]OIVS, Mommsen (1863); [— ITA VTI I.S. E S T RES AGITOR. POST K. SEPT. SEI QVOD NOMEN DEFERETVR, SEI IS QVEI PET 0 - 1 Supp. Mommsen (1905), adapting Mommsen (1863), in turn — 0 - 1 Supp. Mommsen (1905), adapting Mommsen (1863), in turn adapting Klenze 1 - 2 Supp. Mommsen (1905), adapting Mommsen (1863) — 1 - 2 Supp. Mommsen (1905), adapting Mommsen (1863) 2 - 8 6 See the Commentary: unless otherwise stated, we foll — 2 - 8 6 See the Commentary: unless otherwise stated, we follow the text of Mommsen (1905), indicating any changes, except for those of punctuation, resolution of abbreviations and spelling of supplements; we also see no need to postulate a lacuna in 1. 72, two lacunae in 1. 73, two lacunae in 1. 74; 8 - 9 , for reasons explained in the Commentary — 8 - 9 , for reasons explained in the Commentary 8 - 9 See the Commentary vac — 8 - 9 See the Commentary vac QfVAERET, FACITO, QVIDQVID EORVM QVOI, QVEI NOMEN POST K. SE — QfVAERET, FACITO, QVIDQVID EORVM QVOI, QVEI NOMEN POST K. SEPT. EX H.L. DETVLERIT, OB EAM REM EX H.L. DARI OPORTERE IOVDICAT]VM ERIT, M o m m s e n ( 1 8 6 3 ) ; Q[VAERET, FACITO, QVIDQVID iTA — IOVDICAT]VM ERIT, Mommsen (1905); Q[VAERET, FACITO — QVANTVM iTA IOVDICAT]VM ERIT, Lintott; [—]um erit, C QVO MIN[VS IN IOVS EDVCATVR — EIVSQVE NOMEN PR. QVEI EX H.L. — QVO MIN[VS IN IOVS EDVCATVR — EIVSQVE NOMEN PR. QVEI EX H.L. QVAERET RECIPIAT, E.H.L.N.R. DE PATRONO DANDO. QVEI EX H.]L., M o m m s e n ( 1 8 6 3 ) ; QVO MIN[VS IN IOVS EDVCATVR, E.H.L.N.R. — DE PATRONEIS DANDEIS. QVEI .EX H.]L., M o m m s e n vac (1905); QVO MIN[VS DE EO IOVDI - 1 0 Supp. Mommsen, reading however ... INGENVOS EI DATO .. — - 1 0 Supp. Mommsen, reading however ... INGENVOS EI DATO ... Supp. Mommsen, reading however . . . DELATVM ERIT — GENER . — Supp. Mommsen, reading however . . . DELATVM ERIT — GENER . . . ; ATIIGAT, aes; FVERIT, aes 10-11 Supp. Mommsen; [QVEIVE IN FIDE EIVS, QVOIVS NOMEN DELATVM ERIT, MAIORESVE . . . ] , Lintott is on the long side, but possible with some crowding. cognat — is on the long side, but possible with some crowding. cognatio: a relationship between free persons, ascendants, descendants or collaterals, by way of legitimate descent, biological or adoptive, in the male or the female line, see C. Castello, Studi sul diritto familiare e gentilizio romano (Milan, [—] QVAESTIONEM IOVDICIOOVE, aes\ [— Q ] V A E S T I O N — [—] QVAESTIONEM IOVDICIOOVE, aes\ [— Q ] V A E S T I O N E { M } IOVDICIO{O}VE, Klenze; [—] Q V A E S T I O N E { M } IOVDICIO(Q)VE, Mommsen; A to B lacuna, supp. Crawford, adapting Klenze, cf. 1. 13 11-12 mora[m fecerit — ] , Chacon in note; thereafter supp. Lintott; mori[etur — ] , Pi QVEM [VOLET DATO — ] , Mommsen (1863); QVEI S[IBEI DAREI PET — QVEM [VOLET DATO — ] , Mommsen (1863); QVEI S[IBEI DAREI PETET DATO — ] , Mommsen (1905); supp., after checking the bronze, Crawford 12-13 QVEI IN HAC CEIVIT[ATE SESTERTIVM QVADRINGENTORVM MILIVM N ( V M M V M ) PLVRISVE CENSVS SIET — DVM NEI QVEM . . . ] , Mommsen (1863); QVEI IN HAC CIVIT[ATE F V E R I N T E I E QVEI [ — ] , aes, corr. Klenze; Q V E — F V E R I N T E I E QVEI [ — ] , aes, corr. Klenze; Q V E I V [ E M E R C E D E CONDVCTVS DEPVGNAVIT DEPVGNAVERIT ARTEMVE LVDICRAM FECIT FECERIT QVEIVE QVAESTIONE . . . ] , Mommsen (1863); QVEIV[E MERCEDE CONDVCTVS DEPVGNAVIT DEPVGNAVERIT — QVEIVE QVAESTIONE . . . ] , Mommsen (1905); QVEIV[E MER along the lines suggested by Mommsen, seem to us overwhelmin — along the lines suggested by Mommsen, seem to us overwhelming. But neither his own supplement nor that of Carcopino, there discussed, carry conviction either. We suggest quei[ue mercedem ceperit quaestioneue ...] and take the clause quod circa ... non liceat both with [... mercedem ceperit and with TRIBVNVM, IOVDICET, aes: see the Commentary Q[VEI EX H.L. IN — TRIBVNVM, IOVDICET, aes: see the Commentary Q[VEI EX H.L. IN HVNC ANNVM QVAERET — IS DIE ??? EX QVO LEGERIT EORVM, QVEI EX] H.L., Mommsen; IOVDICE(S) Q[VEI EX H.L. IN EVM (presumably a mistake for HVNC) ANNVM ERVNT EDITO — PR, QVEI LEGERIT, EORVM QVEI EX] H.L., LintOtt; SCRIPTES, DESCRIPTOS, aes 14- SESE [EOS EX H.L. LEGISE, DE QVIBVS SIBEI CONSVLTVM SIET — O — SESE [EOS EX H.L. LEGISE, DE QVIBVS SIBEI CONSVLTVM SIET — OPTVMOS EOS IOVDICES FVTVROS ESSE QVOSQVE OETILES IO]VDICES, M o m m s e n ; SESE [EOS EX H.L. LEGISSE, DE QVIBVS SIBEI CONSVLTVM SIET QVOSQVE DILIGENTES FVTVROS IO]VDICES, Lintott 15-19 Supplements follow those of 11. 12-15 unless TRIBV, aes; s v o MA[GISTRATV], Mommsen: the last letter is — TRIBV, aes; s v o MA[GISTRATV], Mommsen: the last letter is not now clear; [—]mque, Chacon: the first letter is not now visible; RECITETVR, aes AB A[LIQVO EORVM PETET — ] , K l e n z e ; AB A[LTERO PETET — AB A[LIQVO EORVM PETET — ] , K l e n z e ; AB A[LTERO PETET — IS EVM, VNDE PETET, POSTQVAM CDL VIREI EX H.L. IN E]VM ANNVM, Mommsen (1863); AB A[RVORSARIO PETET — IS EVM, VNDE PETET, POSTQVAM CDLVIREI EX H.L. IN E]VM ANNVM, M o m m s e n ( 1 9 0 5 ) ; AB A[LTERO PETET, QVOIVS EORVM EX H.L. ANTE K. S The L in LECTEI is that normally used by the engraver for th — The L in LECTEI is that normally used by the engraver for the numeral 50; OM[NES — QVOI IS, QVEIVE EI, QVOIVS NOMEN DELATVM ERIT, GENER SOCER VITRICVS PRI]VIGNVSVE, Mommsen; OM[NES, QVEI VIVANT, IOVDICES, QVOI IS, QVEIVE EI, QVOIVS EX H.L. NOMEN DELATVM ERIT, GENER SOCER VITRICVS PRl]VIGNVSVE, LintO EI above the Q of QVEI, aes\ SOBRINVS[...], Mommsen: the las — EI above the Q of QVEI, aes\ SOBRINVS[...], Mommsen: the last letter is not now visible; SOBRINVS[ SIET PROPIVSVE EVM EA COGNATIONE ATTINGAT — QVEIVE IN EODEM CONLEGIO SIET, QVEIVE E]l SODALIS SIET, M o m m s e n ; SOBRINV[s SIET PROPIVSVE EVM EA COGNATIONE ATTINGAT — QVEIVE IN EODEM CONLEGIO SIET, FAMIIIA, aeS\ NEIVE EVM [LEGAT EDATVE QVEI PECVNIAE CAPTAE C — FAMIIIA, aeS\ NEIVE EVM [LEGAT EDATVE QVEI PECVNIAE CAPTAE CONDEMNATVS EST E R I T AVT QVOD CVM EO LEGE CALPV]RNIA, Mommsen, adapting Klenze; NEIVE EVM [ L E G A T EDATVE QVEI IOVDICIO ALIQVO ALIENO NOMINE EGERIT AVT QVOD AB EO LEGE C A L P V ] R N I A , Venturini, Studi, 1 6 9 - 7 2 ; N E I V E See the Commentary; QVOMI[NVS — SEI IS . . . ] , Mommsen (19 — See the Commentary; QVOMI[NVS — SEI IS . . . ] , Mommsen (1905): the last letter is not now visible 24-5 Q[VOS VOLET, (QVINQVAGINTA) LEGAT . . . ] , Mommsen; Q[VOS VOLET, (QVINQVAGINTA) L E G A T E D A T Q V E . . . ] , Lintott SEIVE [EX CDL VIREIS, QVEI IN EVM ANNVM EX H.L. LECTEI ERVNT — SEIVE [EX CDL VIREIS, QVEI IN EVM ANNVM EX H.L. LECTEI ERVNT, EIVS NOMEN, QVEI SE ALIQVA ADFINITATE COGNATION]E, Lintott, adapting Mommsen; supp. Crawford; E[DIDERIT, TVM EI PE]R, Mommsen; E[DIDERIT, CVI EI PE]R or E[DIDERIT, SI ( E I ) PE]R, Daube, Forms, 5 5 - 6 ; E[DIDERIT, EI PE]R, Lintott 25-6 Supp. Crawford, adapting Mommsen 26-7 PAT[RONOS, QVOS QVE — Supp. Crawford, adapting Mommsen 26-7 PAT[RONOS, QVOS QVEI PETET EX H.L. ACCEPERIT — IN TABOLEIS POPLICEIS . . . ] , M o m m s e n (1905), adapting M o m m s e n (1863); the s u p p l e m e n t of Lintott is grammatically unacceptable Supp. Crawford, cf. 1. 18; P O P L I [ C E I S D — Supp. Crawford, cf. 1. 18; P O P L I [ C E I S DESCRIBERE IS PR. P E R M I T T I T O POTESTATEMQVE SCRIBVNDI FACITO.] M o m m s e n (1863); POPLl[CEIS DESCRIBENDI IS PR. POTESTATEM FACITO —], Mommsen (1905); lectei erunt[—], Chacon, Pinelli, Ritschl; LECTEI ERVNT E [ — ] , Mommsen [— Q]VEI, Mommsen; [— IOVDICEM Q]VEI, Lintott; — [— Q]VEI, Mommsen; [— IOVDICEM Q]VEI, Lintott; PEQVNIAM CAPIET E V M , Mazochi; pequniam ex[—]eum, Pinelli; PEQVNIAM [—]T EVM, aes CEPER[IT, NEI — NEIVE TRIBV MO] VETO, Mommsen; CEPER[IT, NEI QVIS IN IOVS EDVCITO NOMENVE EIVS DEFERTO, NEIVE CENS(OR) AERARIVM RELINQVITO NEIVE T R I B V M Supp. Mommsen, postulating a lacuna (SEI IS PRIVS MORTVOS ER — Supp. Mommsen, postulating a lacuna (SEI IS PRIVS MORTVOS ERIT, 1863); ERI[T, QVOIVM NOMEN AB EO PR. RECEPTVM ERIT, SEI is . . . ] , Lintott; NDICATA, aes; [—]m rem ab eis, Chacon: the first letter is no longer visible 29-30 [QVEI IOVDICIVM . . . DE INQVISITIONE F A C I E N D A . PR. DE EO QVO]lv VTEI IOVDICIVM P[ERFICIATVR EVMQVE QVEI EX H.L. NOMEN DETOLE — VTEI IOVDICIVM P[ERFICIATVR EVMQVE QVEI EX H.L. NOMEN DETOLERIT EIVS IVDICI CAVSA ADMITTAT, VTEI Q]VOD, Mommsen (1863); VTEI IOVDICIVM P[RIMO QVOQVE DIE FIAT, EIQVE, QVEI EX H.L. NOMEN DETOLERIT, DIES QVOT SIBI VIDEBITVR DET, VTEI Q]VOD, Mommsen (1905); V T E I I O V D I C I V M P [ R I M CONCILIAB[OLEIS, VBEI IOVRE DICVNDO PRAESSE SOLENT, AVT IN P — CONCILIAB[OLEIS, VBEI IOVRE DICVNDO PRAESSE SOLENT, AVT IN PROVINCIS (1863, A V T E X T R A ITALIAM, 1905) IN O P P E D E I S F O R E I S C O N ] C I L I A B O L E I S , Mommsen; CONCILIAB[OLEIS, VBEI IOVRE DICVNDO PRAESSE SOLENT, ITEMQVE — IN OPPEDEIS FOREIS CON]CILIABOLEIS, Lintott; . . . SO C[AVSAM PROBAVERIT, QVIBVS IS QVEI PETET DENVNTIAVERIT, EOS — C[AVSAM PROBAVERIT, QVIBVS IS QVEI PETET DENVNTIAVERIT, EOS HOMINES D.T. IIL TESTIMONIVM DEIC]ERE, Mommsen, wrongly: there is no trace of the top horizontal hasta of the E where it should be; C[AVSAM PROBAVERIT, TVM EVM QVEI PETET HOMINIBVS DVMTAXAT iiL — TESTVMONIVM DENVNTIA]RE, Lintott; EI RES, ae FIDE QVAERAT, Mazochi, whence Chacon, Pinelli, Sigonio; MAIO — FIDE QVAERAT, Mazochi, whence Chacon, Pinelli, Sigonio; MAIORESV[E IN MAIORVM EIVS (EIVS added 1905) FIDE FVERINT, QVEIVE EIVS QVOIVS EX H.L. NOMEN DELATVM ERIT C]AVSAM, Mommsen; MAIORESV[E IN MAIORVM FIDE FVERINT, NISEI PATRONVM, QVEI EIVS VNDE PETETVR C] AVSAM, Lintott; QVEI EIVS, VE E above the l RE[RVM CAVSA, DE QVIBVS ID IOVDICIVM FIET — E]A, Mommsen; RE — RE[RVM CAVSA, DE QVIBVS ID IOVDICIVM FIET — E]A, Mommsen; RE[RVM CAVSA, DE QVIBVS ID IOVDICIVM FIET — TESTIMONI]A, Lintott; [... PRODV]CERE, Mommsen; end, supp. Lintott The traces at the bottom of the Aa fragment may be of FA (Li — The traces at the bottom of the Aa fragment may be of FA (Lintott), AC (Crawford), or ci (Hulsen) St = 34 C; Cicero // in Verr. 2, 34. For the copying of lega — St = 34 C; Cicero // in Verr. 2, 34. For the copying of legal texts, see the General Introduction, Ch. XVIII; for recitation in contione, the Tarentum Fragment, Law 8,11. 13-14, and the SC de Bacchanalibus, ILLRP 511,11.22-3. 1.15 The supplements of Mommsen and Lintott for the A - B lacuna are surpr Supp. Mommsen — Supp. Mommsen Supp. Mommsen (1905), adapting Mommsen (1863); QVEI EAM REM — Supp. Mommsen (1905), adapting Mommsen (1863); QVEI EAM REM ERVNT, Mazochi; QVAE EIE[I EX H.L. QVO EAM REM MINVS IOVDICET PERMITTET — ] , Mommsen Supp. Mommsen, reading however . . . QVEIQVOMQVE . . . ; [— — Supp. Mommsen, reading however . . . QVEIQVOMQVE . . . ; [— VBEI EORVM NOMINA IS PRAETOR FECERIT VTEI IN CONTIONE R]ECITENTVR, LintOtt; APVD FOR[VM HABETO — NEIVE QVEMQVAM IOVDICARE SINITO, NISEI QVEI ITA IOVRARIT EORVM QVEI EX E]lS, Mommsen (1863); APVD FOR[VM H A B E T O — NEVE NISEI ITA IOVRARIT [DE — EXCVSANDO. SEI — ACCIDISSE SIBI DEICET QVID, Q — [DE — EXCVSANDO. SEI — ACCIDISSE SIBI DEICET QVID, QVOMINVS AD ID] TOVDICIVM, Mommsen (1863); — SEI — CAVSAM SIBI ESSE DEICET, QVOMINVS AD ID] IOVDICIVM, Mommsen (1905) QVEI EX HAC[E L. QVAERET COGNOSCERE (1905, STATVERE 1863) — ivs ESTO. DE IVDICIO PROFERENDO VEL REFERE]NDO, Mommsen: too lo [— SEI REFER]RE POTERIT, Mommsen; [—]IT VT EIVS, aes — [— SEI REFER]RE POTERIT, Mommsen; [—]IT VT EIVS, aes [— VO]LET, Mommsen; [— QVEI VO]LET, Lintott; HOMINIS, Mazoch — [— VO]LET, Mommsen; [— QVEI VO]LET, Lintott; HOMINIS, Mazochi; PE[QVNIAEVE PETITIO ESTO — ] , Lintott: but in the Este Fragment the phrase occurs in a private law context [— SEI IOVDEX, Q]VEI, Mommsen; [— SEI PRAETOR, Q]VEI, Lintot — [— SEI IOVDEX, Q]VEI, Mommsen; [— SEI PRAETOR, Q]VEI, Lintott; NOVER[IT — is PRAETOR C]ORAM, M o m m s e n ; NOVER[lT, QVAM OB REM IS, QVEI PETET, NON ADFVERIT — is PRAETOR C]ORAM, Lintott; [—]bus in contione, Chacon: the first letter is not now visible; SENTENTIA, aes 42-3 F E C [ I S S E VIDER TER[TIO DIE FACITO IVDICIVM FIAT — SEI IOVDEX, QVEI EAM REJM — TER[TIO DIE FACITO IVDICIVM FIAT — SEI IOVDEX, QVEI EAM REJM QVAERET, Mommsen (1905), with apparatus, adapting Mommsen (1863); TER[TIO DIE — QVOM EAM RE]M QVAERET,.LintOtt I V D I C E [ — ] , Mazochi; [ — ] E I MVLTAM SVPREMA D E I — I V D I C E [ — ] , Mazochi; [ — ] E I MVLTAM SVPREMA D E I C A [ — ] , Peiresc; MVLTAM SVPREMA D E I [ — ] , Dupuy, Scaliger; multam suprema delea[—], Chacon Supp. Mommsen (1905); IV[DICABIT — ] , Mommsen (1863); IV[DI — Supp. Mommsen (1905); IV[DICABIT — ] , Mommsen (1863); IV[DICES IN CONSILIVM VOCARIT — ] , Lintott and 57, but certainly does not occur in 11. 62 and 64. The f — and 57, but certainly does not occur in 11. 62 and 64. The full description appears certainly for the first time in 1. 68. 11. 59-61 The text as preserved at this point contains no reference to the collection of money from the culprit or from his praedes or the raising of money from sale of goods. B [ — ] V R [ — ] , Mazochi; Peiresc saw traces of two letters — [ — ] V R [ — ] , Mazochi; Peiresc saw traces of two letters before RE DEIXERIT ... (DEIXERIT ... also in Dupuy, Scaliger, re deixerit... also in Chacon); he gives them as the bottom of a round letter and as the horizontal and right-hand hasta of an H; we take them as CA; our supplement owes much to [— IVDICES MAIOR PARS EORVM SEI ITA NOLVERIT DE EA RE IV]DIC — [— IVDICES MAIOR PARS EORVM SEI ITA NOLVERIT DE EA RE IV]DICARE, M o m m s e n ( 1 8 6 3 ) ; [— AD QVEM PRAETOREM ITA RELATVM ERIT IVDICVM PLVS TERTIAM PARTEM Supp. in essentials Lintott, adapting Mommsen; vacat in Peir — Supp. in essentials Lintott, adapting Mommsen; vacat in Peiresc, Chacon; r of ader[unt] only in Chacon [ — ] M REM AGITO ... NEI E [ — ] , Peiresc (the first and l — [ — ] M REM AGITO ... NEI E [ — ] , Peiresc (the first and last letters not in Dupuy, Scaliger, the first and last two letters not in Chacon), ruling out Mommsen's supplement at the end; supp. Crawford, adapting Mommsen; CONIECIANT[ ADPONI FACITO — ] , Mommsen; CONIECIANT[ ANTE TRIBVNAL SVVM PONI IV whom he shall want as jurors — nothing of that is proposed b — whom he shall want as jurors — nothing of that is proposed by this statute, provided that he do not knowingly with wrongful deceit] choose [as a juror any of those whom according to this statute it may not be lawful to choose as belonging to the 100 men.] Whoever shall have been chosen in this way, [—]io EIQVE IVDICIS, Peiresc ( [ — ] D EIQVE IVDICIS, Dupuy, — [—]io EIQVE IVDICIS, Peiresc ( [ — ] D EIQVE IVDICIS, Dupuy, Scaliger, [—]eique iudicis, Chacon) ruling out Mommsen's supplements; mi L A [ — ] , Peiresc, Chacon; m i C A [ — ] , Dupuy, Scaliger; thereafter, supp. in essentials Mattingly (1969), 134, adapting Mommsen: there is no room for Mat LITIERAM, Peiresc, Dupuy, Scaliger; literam, Chacon; thereaf — LITIERAM, Peiresc, Dupuy, Scaliger; literam, Chacon; thereafter, supp. Crawford, adapting Mattingly (1969); end, IV[DICES VERSVS OSTENDITO, ITAQVE IN EAM SITELLAM CONIECITO — ] , Mommsen (1905), adapting Mommsen (1863); IV[DICES IS PRAETOR FACITO — ] , Mattingly (1969) 52-3 [... QVEI IVDEX PRONVN DEMITITO, Peiresc, Dupuy, Chacon; DEMITTITO, Scaliger; ITEAM — DEMITITO, Peiresc, Dupuy, Chacon; DEMITTITO, Scaliger; ITEAM, Dupuy, Scaliger; ET EAM, Peiresc; eam, Chacon POPVL[O OSTENDITO — ] , Mommsen; POPVL[O PALAM OSTENDITO], Lintott; thereafter, supp. in essentials Mattingly (1969); the L of L[ATEAT] is clear, checked by Crawford SENTENTIA[M EA SORS HAB]VE PROXVMO, Peiresc, Dupuy; PROXSVMO, Scaliger, Chacon; supp. C — PROXVMO, Peiresc, Dupuy; PROXSVMO, Scaliger, Chacon; supp. Crawford, adapting Mattingly (1969) and Lintott; DE R[—] is clear in 1. 2 of D; [—]reo ap[—], Chacon, as the last line of Be (printed by Orsini and by Gottling from Orsini): there is now no trace of these letters, but it is perfecdy credible CAVSA, Dupuy, Chac6n; CAVSSA, Scaliger; APSOLVTVS, Peiresc, — CAVSA, Dupuy, Chac6n; CAVSSA, Scaliger; APSOLVTVS, Peiresc, Dupuy, Chacon; ABSOLVTVS, Scaliger; vacat in Peiresc, Chacon; thereafter, supp. Crawford, adapting Mattingly (1969) 55-6 [ DE EADEM RE NE BIS AGATVR. QVEI EX H.L. CONDEMNATVS] AVT APSOLVTVS, Mommsen Peiresc suggests that the A of the first AVT was not visible — Peiresc suggests that the A of the first AVT was not visible, contra Dupuy, Scaliger, Chacon; H.L., Peiresc, clearly rightly; CAVSA, Dupuy; CAVSSA, Scaliger; CAVSA corrected to CAVSSA, Chacon vacat in Peiresc, Chacdn; DE LEITIBVS A E S T V M A N D I — vacat in Peiresc, Chacdn; DE LEITIBVS A E S T V M A N D I S , Peiresc; DE L I T I B V S A E S T V M A N D E I S , Dupuy; D E LEITIBVS A E S T V M A N D E I S , Scaliger, Chacon; vacat in Peiresc, Chacon; [—]HACI, aes 58-9 PETl[TIO ERIT, ID PRAETOR, QVEI EAM REM QVAESIERIT, EOS IVDICES, QVEI E A RES, QVOS, Dupuy, Scaliger, Chacon; CO[NSILIO PROBABIT]V — E A RES, QVOS, Dupuy, Scaliger, Chacon; CO[NSILIO PROBABIT]VR, Mommsen, probably too long Initial o, Dupuy, Scaliger only; EIEI IVDICEI, Dupuy, Chacon — Initial o, Dupuy, Scaliger only; EIEI IVDICEI, Dupuy, Chacon; EI IVDICEI, Scaliger; MAiOREi [—], Dupuy, Scaliger; MAIORI P A [ — ] , Peiresc; maiorei pa[—], Chacon; PA[RTI EORVM SA]TIS, Mommsen, probably too long 60-1 Q[VANTA EA PEQVNIA ERIT, IS IVDEX FACITO — SEI DE EA RE PRAEDES DATI E R V PROXVMO, Dupuy; PROXSVMO, Scaliger; proxumo corrected to pro — PROXVMO, Dupuy; PROXSVMO, Scaliger; proxumo corrected to proxsumo, Chacon; thereafter, supp. Mommsen; DOLO M[ALO, QVO MINVS IN TRIDVO PROXSVMO, QVO ITA SATIS FECERIT, SOLVATVR — ] , K l e n z e ; DOLO [MALO, .QVO MINVS EA PEQVNIA ITA SOLVATVR — ] , Lintott 61-2 Supp. Mommsen; [ PROXVMEIS, Dupuy; PROXSVMEIS, Scaliger; proximis, — PROXVMEIS, Dupuy; PROXSVMEIS, Scaliger; proximis, Chacon; [QVAE POTVE]RIT, Mommsen; [QVANTA POTVE]RIT, Lintott 62-3 Supp. Crawford, adapting Mommsen; FAC[TVS ERIT, TVM CVM PECVNIA ILLA REDACTA ERIT, TRIBVTVM INDICITO — DIEMQVE EDITO, QVA IS QVOIVS PARENTISVE QVOIVS EIVSVE QVOI IPS Dupuy, Scaliger and Peiresc preserve the right-hand hasta of — Dupuy, Scaliger and Peiresc preserve the right-hand hasta of the v of [—JVMATAE, Peiresc clearly as that of a v; Chac6n has aestumatae, evidently by tacit restoration; AVT, om. aes\ POPVLOVE, Dupuy; POPVLOVE corrected to POPVLEIVE, Scaliger; populiue corrected to populeiue, C SED FRVDE, Dupuy, Scaliger; sedfraude, Chacon; supp. Mommsen — SED FRVDE, Dupuy, Scaliger; sedfraude, Chacon; supp. Mommsen; vacat in Peiresc; ADFRIT, aes\ supp. Mommsen PRODVXERIT, Scaliger, in error; VTI, Dupuy; VTEI, Scaliger, — PRODVXERIT, Scaliger, in error; VTI, Dupuy; VTEI, Scaliger, Chac6n;. supp. Mommsen; PRODE[IXERIT, VTEI TABVLA MA]IORE, Lintott; FRIT, aes, contra Lintott Q V I Q V O M [ — ] , P e i r e s c , Chacon; Q V E I Q V O — Q V I Q V O M [ — ] , P e i r e s c , Chacon; Q V E I Q V O M [ — ] , Dupuy, Scaliger; [ F I S C I RESIGNENTVR, ET SEI EA PEQVNIA, QVAM IN EO FISCO ESSE INSCRIPTVM ERIT, IBEI INVENTA ERIT, DENVO OPSIGNENTVR — ] , M o m m s e n 68-9 [— QVAESTOR VTEI SOLVAT. QVOl] PEQVNIAM, M o m m s e n PEQVLATVM, Dupuy, Scaliger, Chacon; QVEI, Dupuy, Scaliger; q — PEQVLATVM, Dupuy, Scaliger, Chacon; QVEI, Dupuy, Scaliger; qui, Chacon; SOLVI IVS ERiT, Dupuy, Chacon; SOLVEI IVSERIT, Scaliger NDIC[.]VM, aes\ PROVE [QVO INPERIO POTESTATEVE ]ERIT[ FACITO — NDIC[.]VM, aes\ PROVE [QVO INPERIO POTESTATEVE ]ERIT[ FACITO, QVO]MINVS, M o m m s e n (1905) with apparatus, whence CIL I 2 ; PROVE [INPERIO I N P E ] D I [ T O QVO] MINVS, Lintott; reading checked by Crawford: the supplements between the E and D fragments in the preceding two lines are of 15 lette ADDVCIER, Scaliger, in error; POSS[IT QVOVE QVOI EORVM MINVS — ADDVCIER, Scaliger, in error; POSS[IT QVOVE QVOI EORVM MINVS IN E O IVDICI]O VERBA, Mommsen, too long; POSS[IT QVOVE QVOI MINVS ]VERBA, Lintott, too short vacat in Peiresc, Chacon; EO MAGISTRATV omitted on aes\ the — vacat in Peiresc, Chacon; EO MAGISTRATV omitted on aes\ the elimination by Bannier of the quaestor from the supplements in 1. 72 is refuted by his presence in 1. 7 3 ; [... FACTAVE ERVNT, QVAE EVM PRAETOREM EVMVE QVAESTOREM EX H.L. IVDICARI IVBERE SOLVERE FACERE OPORTET; QVEIQVOMQVE DEINCEPS PRAETOR O P O R T E R E S [ — ] , Dupuy, Scaliger; S E [ — ] , Peire — O P O R T E R E S [ — ] , Dupuy, Scaliger; S E [ — ] , Peiresc, recording only the last two letters; oportere sei[—], Chacon; [... QVIBVSQVOM IOVDICIVM], Mommsen (1905) FORVM, Dupuy, Scaliger, Peiresc, corr. Chaco — FORVM, Dupuy, Scaliger, Peiresc, corr. Chacon; DEIVRATVRVM QVOVE MAGISTRATVS IS DE EA RE, aes\ QVOM [EO LEGE CALPVRNIA AVT LEGE IVNIA SACRAMENTO AGATVR . . . ] , Meyer (1978): but we know of no parallel for the formula e.h.l.n.r relating Cf. the Tarentum Fragment, Law 8, 11. 2 - 3 , [... QVOIVS EO — Cf. the Tarentum Fragment, Law 8, 11. 2 - 3 , [... QVOIVS EORVM OPERA MAXIME VNIVS EVM CONDEMNATVM ESSE CONSTITERIT — SEI VOLET IPSE FILIEIQVE, QVEI EIEI GNATEI ERVNT, QVOM . . . ] , Mommsen (1905) [ — ] M EIEI, Dupuy, Scaliger, Chacon; [—]VM EIEI, Peiresc; — [ — ] M EIEI, Dupuy, Scaliger, Chacon; [—]VM EIEI, Peiresc; CEIVIS, Scaliger, in error; EA TRIBVM, aes si QVEIS, Peiresc, by inadvertence; QVEI [NOMINIS LATINI SVN — si QVEIS, Peiresc, by inadvertence; QVEI [NOMINIS LATINI SVNT — QVEI EORVM IN SVA Q V I S Q V E CIVITATE D I C T A ] T O R , M o m m s e n (1905); [—]tor, Chacon, Pighius, Mommsen; [—]EOR, Ritschl, certainly wrongly: there is only a top horizontal hasta; the subsequent vacat is perhaps the result of [—] AT ATE IVDEX, Dupuy; [ — ] A T A T E IVDEX, Scal — [—] AT ATE IVDEX, Dupuy; [ — ] A T A T E IVDEX, Scaliger; [—] utilitate iudex, Chacon; [—]IITATE, Peiresc; Peiresc ignores the vacat, present in Dupuy and Chacon, because he takes for granted the edition of Orsini deriving from Chacon PRAETOR QVAESTOR OMNIVM, aes — PRAETOR QVAESTOR OMNIVM, aes EVIT, DEEERATVR, aes — EVIT, DEEERATVR, aes Text of E from Peiresc — Text of E from Peiresc MERITA SVNT, aes — MERITA SVNT, aes [—]i PETETVR, Mommsen, [—]TI or [—]si in apparatus — [—]i PETETVR, Mommsen, [—]TI or [—]si in apparatus Supp. Mattingly (1969), 141; [— HA]BERE, Mommsen — Supp. Mattingly (1969), 141; [— HA]BERE, Mommsen Supp. Lintott in commentary; [— PROVO]CATIO, Mommsen — Supp. Lintott in commentary; [— PROVO]CATIO, Mommsen [—iATEioy[—], Lintott — [—iATEioy[—], Lintott BC (573-4 M = 607-8 W = 574-5 K). See also on 11. 58-9. The — BC (573-4 M = 607-8 W = 574-5 K). See also on 11. 58-9. The text says nothing in either sense about men who have been acquitted: our legislator will obviously have taken for granted a general presumption that they could not be prosecuted again for the same offence. I. 75 We cannot know exactly what

Editions and commentary M. H. Crawford, Roman Statutes I (London 1996), Law 1. In folder. Formula Dossier case #15 — slot-by-slot decomposition.