Cn. Iulius Agricola · Agricola 4.1 (lat)
Gnaeus Iulius Agricola
Full name in the work identifies the subject; PIR source ID 7292 records Cn. Iulius Agricola. Do not join per:agricola (consul 421).
46 editorial identity annotations in 22 ancient passage groups. Translations are dependent witnesses. This is a bounded pilot, not a complete register. Build c17f119d6ff2.
Gnaeus Iulius Agricola
Full name in the work identifies the subject; PIR source ID 7292 records Cn. Iulius Agricola. Do not join per:agricola (consul 421).
Julius Agricola
Translation of the same ancient witness as Latin 4.1; chapter-level context identifies the subject.
Natus erat Agricola
Subject continuity with Agricola 4.1; birth consular formula retained separately from its modern year conversion.
Collega Priscinoque consulibus
Continues the death statement begun in 44.1. Consular roster gives Collega and Priscinus in 93 CE.
Agricola was born
Translation of chapter 44; inherited English age wording differs from the Latin and is not used to calculate dates.
Iulius Frontinus
Named successor in the British command narrative. Identification with Sex. Iulius Frontinus, PIR I0322, is an editorial contextual identification; no tenure dates assigned by this passage.
Julius Frontinus
Translation of the same ancient witness as Latin 17.3, not independent corroboration.
Corbulo provinciam
German command narrative; Ronald Syme, Domitius Corbulo, JRS 60 (1970), 27–39, visible note 12 explicitly identifies this passage with the general. It does not identify the father or generic C1288.
Corbulo meanwhile
Translation of the same ancient witness as the Latin chapter, not independent evidence.
Domitium Corbulonem
Named commander in Armenia narrative, continuous with the general in Annals 11.18; PIR D0142. Political praise is reported by Tacitus, not adopted as a factual assessment.
Domitius Corbulo
Translation of the same ancient witness as Latin 13.8; geographical mentions do not establish personal presence at all named locations.
nonus Tiberio annus
Regnal and consular narrative context identifies the emperor; context is not a full tenure claim.
Servi Maluginensis defuncti
Exact source name and death report. Source-local person preserved; no PIR identity inferred.
filius Maluginensis patri suffectus
Son succeeds father; personal name unspecified. No inherited praenomen supplied.
Corneliae virgini
Vestal Cornelia in this source context; PIR identity unresolved.
in locum Scantiae capiebatur
Scantia is the predecessor in this source context; no life dates inferred.
Πιλᾶτος δὲ ὁ τῆς Ἰουδαίας ἡγεμὼν
Governor named in the Iudaean narrative; PIR P0815 records Pontius Pilatus. Office title and all place/event roles are reviewed separately.
Pilate, the procurator of Judea
Whiston translation of the same Josephus passage as Greek 18.55; procurator is the translation’s wording, not an independently normalized Roman title.
Pontium Pilatum
Pontius Pilatus in a retrospective statement explicitly set under Tiberius. The surrounding Neronian fire narrative does not date Pilate’s activity.
Κλαύδιον Φήλικα
Claudius Felix, brother of Pallas, sent over affairs of Iudaea; PIR A0828 explicitly preserves the Claudius/Antonius name variants.
Felix, the brother of Pallas
Dependent translation of Josephus 20.137; the Pallas relationship and Iudaean context distinguish this Felix.
Φήλικι
Predecessor of Porcius Festus in Iudaea; continuity with the brother of Pallas in 20.137 identifies this Felix.
Πορκίου δὲ Φήστου
Full name and the Iudaean succession context identify Porcius Festus, PIR P0858.
Porcius Festus
Dependent Whiston translation of the same ancient passage as Greek 20.182.
Φήστου
Continuity with the preceding explicit full name in 20.182. Arrival is into Iudaea; no particular city or calendar year is supplied here.
Festus’s coming
Dependent translation of the same ancient witness as Greek 20.185.
Aelium Seianum
Praetorian prefect identified by name and office in Tacitus; PIR A0255. The paragraph’s consular frame does not date its retrospective birth statement.
mater Iulia Procilla fuit
Full name and explicit mother relationship to the subject of the work identify Iulia Procilla, PIR I0693.
Domitiam Decidianam
Full name in the marriage narrative identifies Domitia Decidiana, PIR D0174.
pater illi Iulius Graecinus
Explicit father relationship. A source-local identity avoids choosing a PIR praenomen absent from this passage.
Αὔγουστος
Octavian receives the name Augustus in this specific narrative. The same word elsewhere can be a title of a different emperor.
ἕβδομον ὑπατεύων
Contextual subject attribution to Caesar/Octavian continuing 53.1, with an explicit seventh-consulship formula; this is not a literal personal-name expression.
Massiliam habuit
Contextual attribution to Agricola, the subject identified in 4.1. The passage describes his education; it is not a new literal name occurrence.
Agricolam
The named subject and continuous Agricola narrative identify the same Cn. Iulius Agricola as 4.1 (PIR I 0126, ID 7292). This contextual identity review does not supply an office date or identify every homonymous person.
provinciae Aquitaniae praeposuit
The named subject and continuous Agricola narrative identify the same Cn. Iulius Agricola as 4.1 (PIR I 0126, ID 7292). This contextual identity review does not supply an office date or identify every homonymous person.
ubi conventus ac iudicia poscerent
The named subject and continuous Agricola narrative identify the same Cn. Iulius Agricola as 4.1 (PIR I 0126, ID 7292). This contextual identity review does not supply an office date or identify every homonymous person.
minus triennium in ea legatione detentus
The named subject and continuous Agricola narrative identify the same Cn. Iulius Agricola as 4.1 (PIR I 0126, ID 7292). This contextual identity review does not supply an office date or identify every homonymous person.
Britanniae praepositus est
The named subject and continuous Agricola narrative identify the same Cn. Iulius Agricola as 4.1 (PIR I 0126, ID 7292). This contextual identity review does not supply an office date or identify every homonymous person.
transgressus Agricola
The named subject and continuous Agricola narrative identify the same Cn. Iulius Agricola as 4.1 (PIR I 0126, ID 7292). This contextual identity review does not supply an office date or identify every homonymous person.
Syriam provinciam Agricolae destinari
The named subject and continuous Agricola narrative identify the same Cn. Iulius Agricola as 4.1 (PIR I 0126, ID 7292). This contextual identity review does not supply an office date or identify every homonymous person.
tradiderat interim Agricola successori suo provinciam
The named subject and continuous Agricola narrative identify the same Cn. Iulius Agricola as 4.1 (PIR I 0126, ID 7292). This contextual identity review does not supply an office date or identify every homonymous person.
Ἰωάζαρον τὸν Βοηθοῦ
The patronymic is explicit. No PIR identity or identification with another Boethus family member is admitted. Identity read in the Greek passage. The containing reader unit is 17.332; exact source sections 17.339 and 17.341 are recorded by the edition concordance.
Ἐλεάζαρον τὸν ἐκείνου
The text calls him the brother of the preceding Joazar. No additional patronymic, PIR identity or Roman priesthood is supplied. Identity read in the Greek passage. The containing reader unit is 17.332; exact source sections 17.339 and 17.341 are recorded by the edition concordance.
Ἰησοῦ τοῦ Σεὲ παιδός
The father’s name and high-priestly succession context identify this source-local person. No identification with Jesus of Nazareth or another Jesus is admitted. Identity read in the Greek passage. The containing reader unit is 17.332; exact source sections 17.339 and 17.341 are recorded by the edition concordance.
Servius Maluginensis flamen Dialis
Editorial co-reference within the same Latin Annals: the named flamen Dialis in 3.58, the named respondent in 3.71 and the deceased Servius Maluginensis in 4.16 are retained as the existing source-local father. The son succeeds him only in 4.16 and remains separate. No fuller nomenclature or PIR identity is inferred.
Servium Maluginensem flaminem Dialem
Same named flamen and the explicitly deferred answer to his request in 3.58. This is a source-local editorial identity decision; no external PIR identity or identity for the unnamed recipient of Asia is supplied.
pater illi Iulius Graecinus
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 4.1
No praenomen or PIR identity is supplied for the father by this statement.
Source and connectionsmater Iulia Procilla fuit
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 4.2
The relationship belongs to this narrative, not to every person called Iulia Procilla.
Source and connectionsDomitiam Decidianam, splendidis natalibus ortam, sibi iunxit
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 6.1
Marriage date is not calculated from the career sequence.
Source and connectionssedem ac magistram studiorum Massiliam habuit
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 4.3
A place of studies; no institution, street location or calendar year is supplied.
Source and connectionsHinc ad capessendos magistratus in urbem degressus
editorial-place-identification · lat · reader unit 6.1
Urbs is identified as Rome from the magistracy and narrative context. A city point is not the location of his house, wedding or an exact route.
Source and connectionssors quaesturae provinciam Asiam, pro consule Salvium Titianum dedit
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 6.2
A quaestor in Asia is not a provincial governor. No proconsul’s seat is plotted as Agricola’s personal presence and no career date is inferred.
Source and connectionsΠιλᾶτος δὲ ὁ τῆς Ἰουδαίας ἡγεμὼν
source-explicit · grc · reader unit 18.55
Greek ἡγεμών is preserved. A technical Latin title is not supplied by normalization.
Source and connectionsPilate, the procurator of Judea
dependent-translation · eng · reader unit 18.55
This is the translation of Josephus’s Greek wording, not independent evidence for a normalized Roman title.
Source and connectionsTiberio imperitante per procuratorem Pontium Pilatum
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 15.44
This source wording is retained alongside Josephus and his translation. The Tiberian context window is not a full tenure and the surrounding fire narrative does not place Pilate in 64 CE.
Source and connectionsστρατιὰν ἐκ Καισαρείας ἀγαγὼν καὶ μεθιδρύσας χειμαδιοῦσαν ἐν Ἱεροσολύμοις
source-explicit · grc · reader unit 18.55
The moving referent is the army. This statement alone does not establish Pilate’s journey or personal presence at Jerusalem; no personal route is generated.
Source and connectionsαὐτὸς ἐπὶ τὸ βῆμα ἧκεν
editorial-place-identification · grc · reader unit 18.55
Caesarea is supplied by the preceding εἰς Καισάρειαν audience context. Its gazetteer point represents the city, not an identified tribunal or stadium.
Source and connectionsΚλαύδιον Φήλικα Πάλλαντος ἀδελφὸν τῶν κατὰ τὴν Ἰουδαίαν προστησόμενον πραγμάτων
source-explicit · grc · reader unit 20.137
The following twelfth-regnal-year sentence concerns Agrippa’s grant. It is not automatically copied onto Felix’s commission or converted into a precise appointment date.
Source and connectionsΠορκίου δὲ Φήστου διαδόχου Φήλικι πεμφθέντος ὑπὸ Νέρωνος
source-explicit · grc · reader unit 20.182
Relative succession is explicit; a calendar year or seamless, gapless tenure sequence is not inferred.
Source and connectionsἈφικομένου δὲ εἰς τὴν Ἰουδαίαν Φήστου
source-explicit · grc · reader unit 20.185
Arrival into a region does not identify a port, capital, journey line or exact date.
Source and connectionsΑὔγουστος ὡς καὶ πλεῖόν τι ἢ κατὰ ἀνθρώπους ὢν ἐπεκλήθη
source-explicit · grc · reader unit 53.16.8
The name and author’s explanation are preserved. This title does not identify the same person in every other context.
Source and connectionsἕβδομον ὑπατεύων
source-explicit · grc · reader unit 53.2.7
The year conversion uses the consular roster. It does not assign that year to every event in the containing book or coarse translation chapter.
Source and connectionsgenitus Vulsiniis
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 4.1
Birth date is unknown; the paragraph’s year 23 CE is not a birth date. The project has not adjudicated the competing site identifications.
Source and connectionsAelium Seianum cohortibus praetoriis praefectum
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 4.1
The consular frame supplies narrative context, not a complete prefectural tenure.
Source and connectionsvicesimae legioni tarde ad sacramentum transgressae praeposuit
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 7.5
A legionary command is distinct from a provincial governorship. No calendar year or command headquarters is supplied by this quotation.
Source and connectionsdivus Vespasianus inter patricios adscivit
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 9.1
A social-status change, not a magistracy or a personal travel statement. No calendar date is inferred from Vespasian’s reign.
Source and connectionsac deinde provinciae Aquitaniae praeposuit
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 9.1
The text reports provincial command. A normalized technical title and exact appointment years require separate evidence; no capital point substitutes for the jurisdiction.
Source and connectionsubi conventus ac iudicia poscerent, gravis intentus
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 9.3
An iterative character description in the Aquitanian career context, not a dated individual assize, district boundary, resident association or itinerary. No session location is supplied.
Source and connectionsminus triennium in ea legatione detentus
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 9.6
The upper bound is strict. The text gives neither endpoints nor a three-year continuous span with known calendar years. No integer year bounds are fabricated.
Source and connectionsconsul egregiae tum spei filiam iuveni mihi despondit
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 9.7
The consulship is explicit. This batch does not assign 77/78 or infer a full-year ordinary consulship from the narrative. Specialist fasti and documentary evidence remain a separate collation task.
Source and connectionsac post consulatum collocavit, et statim Britanniae praepositus est
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 9.7
The source sequence is preserved without choosing between calendar reconstructions. A provincial reference does not identify the capital or prove presence across a provincial polygon.
Source and connectionsadiecto pontificatus sacerdotio
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 9.7
Pontifical priesthood is distinct from pontifex maximus. The narrative association with the British appointment does not establish an exact co-option date, continuous annual membership roster or ritual venue.
Source and connectionsmedia iam aestate transgressus Agricola invenit
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 18.1
The crossing and seasonal wording are explicit; the regional identification follows the immediately preceding Britanniae statum. Neither departure port, landing point, route nor calendar year is inferred.
Source and connectionsaddique insuper opinionem, Syriam provinciam Agricolae destinari
source-reported-proposal · lat · reader unit 40.1
Tacitus explicitly frames the Syrian posting as opinio. The following story in 40.2 is qualified sive verum ... sive ... fictum. This statement does not admit a Syrian governorship, personal presence or journey.
Source and connectionstradiderat interim Agricola successori suo provinciam quietam tutamque
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 40.3
The province is Britain in the narrative context. The successor’s name, exact handover date and a gapless succession are not supplied by this passage.
Source and connectionsnoctu in urbem, noctu in Palatium
editorial-place-identification · lat · reader unit 40.3
Rome is the contextual identification of urbs and Palatium. The existing city point represents Rome; it is not a palace coordinate or a reconstructed itinerary.
Source and connectionsἸωάζαρον τὸν Βοηθοῦ ἀφελόμενος τὴν ἀρχιερωσύνην
source-explicit · grc · reader unit 17.332
Josephus’s explicit source report in 17.339. The institution is the Judaean high priesthood. No calendar date, gapless tenure, Roman-college membership or external person identity is inferred.
Source and connectionsἘλεάζαρον τὸν ἐκείνου ἐπικαθίσταται ἀδελφόν
source-explicit · grc · reader unit 17.332
Josephus’s explicit source report in 17.339. The institution is the Judaean high priesthood. No calendar date, gapless tenure, Roman-college membership or external person identity is inferred.
Source and connectionsἘλεάζαρον τὸν ἐκείνου ἐπικαθίσταται ἀδελφόν
source-explicit · grc · reader unit 17.332
Josephus’s explicit source report in 17.339. The institution is the Judaean high priesthood. No calendar date, gapless tenure, Roman-college membership or external person identity is inferred.
Source and connectionsἐπικατασταθέντος αὐτῷ ζῶντι Ἰησοῦ τοῦ Σεὲ παιδός
source-explicit · grc · reader unit 17.332
Josephus’s explicit source report in 17.341. The institution is the Judaean high priesthood. No calendar date, gapless tenure, Roman-college membership or external person identity is inferred.
Source and connectionsServius Maluginensis flamen Dialis
source-explicit · lat · reader unit 3.58
The priestly title is explicit. The narrative frame supplies a 22 CE attestation, not his inauguration, continuous membership or a new identity for his later unnamed son.
Source and connectionsServius Maluginensis flamen Dialis ut Asiam sorte haberet postulavit
source-reported-proposal · lat · reader unit 3.58
The verb postulavit reports a request by Maluginensis. It does not report an imperial nomination, a successful allotment, provincial tenure or personal presence in Asia.
Source and connectionsfrustra vulgatum dictitans non licere Dialibus egredi Italia neque aliud ius suum quam Martialium Quirinaliumque flaminum
source-reported-argument · lat · reader unit 3.58
Tacitus attributes this contention to Maluginensis. It is not adopted as settled law; his later appeal to the long vacancy after Merula is not converted into an inauguration date or an independently verified vacancy series.
Source and connectionsquotiens valetudo adversa flaminem Dialem incessisset, ut pontificis maximi arbitrio plus quam binoctium abesset, dum ne diebus publici sacrificii neu saepius quam bis eundem in annum
source-reported-rule · lat · reader unit 3.71
This is Tacitus’s report of the decree read in the case. Conditions include illness, the supreme pontiff’s discretion, exclusion of public-sacrifice days and a twice-yearly limit. It is neither evidence that Maluginensis was ill or actually absent nor a newly dated enactment under Tiberius. The report context is 22 CE; the original Augustan enactment year remains unknown.
Source and connectionsquae principe Augusto constituta satis ostendebant annuam absentiam et provinciarum administrationem Dialibus non concedi
source-reported-decision · lat · reader unit 3.71
The reported response invokes Augustan provisions against an annual absence and provincial administration for Diales. The rule’s original calendar date is not inferred, and no Maluginensis governorship is admitted.
Source and connectionsita sors Asiae in eum qui consularium Maluginensi proximus erat conlata
source-reported-decision · lat · reader unit 3.71
The person who receives the lot is unnamed here and is not registered under a conjectural identity. The allocation is not assigned to Maluginensis and supplies no journey or provincial tenure for him.
Source and connections