{"edition":"Alignment feasibility pilot v9, 17 October 2026","status":"Geometry discrepancy screen; no historical low-alignment verdict or p-value","scope":"Three labelled screenshot records; the unlabelled screenshot is not identified by guesswork.","method":{"crs":"WGS84 longitude/latitude input; separate WGS84 azimuthal equidistant projection centred on each point","search_radius_m":50000,"geodesic_densification_max_m":1000,"distance":"Minimum point-to-model-polyline distance, rounded to metres for reproducibility; coordinate accuracy remains unknown.","categories":"Source classes retained separately; brown dashed atlas lines are Conjectured, purple dotted lines Hypothetical.","source_edits":"No coordinate snapping, route reshaping, endpoint displacement or date inference.","uncertainty":"Unknown point/road errors do not become zero. 50 km is a reporting window, not an archaeological acceptance threshold."},"eligibility":{"curated_objects":47,"t1_t2a_objects":4,"located_primary_assertions":3,"currently_admitted_meter_bounded_primary_points":0,"independent_pair_tests":0,"reason":"No current primary point has both admitted comparison geometry and justified metric error; pair-specific source independence and chronology remain additional gates."},"records":[{"id":"EDCS-31400384","place":"Lukavac","raw_coordinates":[18.5325309,44.5344136],"publication":"CIL 03, 13316 = CIL 17-04, 00442","raw_date":[251,253],"location_role":"unverified catalogue locality","coordinate_author":null,"coordinate_accuracy_m":null,"historical_test_eligible":false,"metrics":{"all":{"status":"measured","id":28738,"name":"Hedum Castellum Daesitiatium-north","certainty":"Hypothetical","distance_m":109,"nearest_model_coordinate":[18.533516141984407,44.53373138434039],"author":"Jens Christoffersen","bibliography":"BAtlas 20","start":null,"end":null,"sourceDates":{"lowerDate":0,"lowerDateError":0,"upperDate":0,"upperDateError":0},"source_independence":"unassessed","temporal_compatibility":"not established by geometric proximity"},"Certain":{"status":"beyond-search-radius","distance_m":null,"meaning":"No segment of this class within 50 km; not evidence of road absence"},"Conjectured":{"status":"measured","id":28395,"name":"Karakaj-Bijeljina","certainty":"Conjectured","distance_m":31232,"nearest_model_coordinate":[18.910195999999996,44.61264100000001],"author":"Pau de Soto","bibliography":"BAtlas 20","start":null,"end":null,"sourceDates":{"lowerDate":0,"lowerDateError":0,"upperDate":0,"upperDateError":0},"source_independence":"unassessed","temporal_compatibility":"not established by geometric proximity"},"Hypothetical":{"status":"measured","id":28738,"name":"Hedum Castellum Daesitiatium-north","certainty":"Hypothetical","distance_m":109,"nearest_model_coordinate":[18.533516141984407,44.53373138434039],"author":"Jens Christoffersen","bibliography":"BAtlas 20","start":null,"end":null,"sourceDates":{"lowerDate":0,"lowerDateError":0,"upperDate":0,"upperDateError":0},"source_independence":"unassessed","temporal_compatibility":"not established by geometric proximity"}},"coordinate_audit":{"reason":"Ballif 1893 p.39 explicitly distinguishes the fragment then lying near Lukavica from its untraceable original findspot; p.51 no.46 does not mark it in situ. Popović 2019 p.202 repeats that the exact location is unknown and places Lukavica on the Studeni Jadar route near Milići. The imported Lukavac point has no documented surveying or geocoding attribution in the supplied snapshot. It cannot test distance from an original roadside setting.","attribution":"The EDCS-derived number has no named georeferencer. Ballif/Patsch recorded the historical fragment; Gräf is responsible for the linked EDH record, whose coordinate fields are null. Neither is established as the numeric point's creator.","sources":[{"id":"edcs-local","type":"local metadata snapshot","url":"https://db.edcs.eu/epigr/epi.php?s_sprache=en","locator":"EDCS-31400384; exact imported fields preserved above","consulted":"Full local row inspected; upstream numeric-coordinate authorship unresolved"},{"id":"edh-local","type":"local metadata snapshot","url":"https://edh.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/edh/inschrift/HD057720","locator":"HD057720; findspot, findspot_modern, present_location, responsible_individual, Longitude, Latitude, literature, last_update","consulted":"Full local row inspected; live page retrieval failed"},{"id":"ballif-1893-p39","type":"published survey, primary historical source","title":"Philipp Ballif, Römische Strassen in Bosnien und der Hercegovina (Wien 1893)","url":"https://www.cidom.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Philipp-Ballif-Romische-strassen-in-Bosnien-und-der-Hercegovina-1893_opt.pdf#page=47","locator":"Printed p.39, final paragraph;  of 108","consulted":"Full page image rendered and visually inspected; OCR checked against scan","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."},{"id":"ballif-1893-p51","type":"published survey, primary historical source","title":"Ballif 1893, milestone inventory","url":"https://www.cidom.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Philipp-Ballif-Romische-strassen-in-Bosnien-und-der-Hercegovina-1893_opt.pdf#page=59","locator":"Printed p.51 no.46;  of 108; in-situ column shows a dash","consulted":"Full page image rendered and visually inspected","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."},{"id":"patsch-1893-p69","type":"published epigraphic edition, primary historical source","title":"Karl Patsch, appendix in Ballif 1893","url":"https://www.cidom.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Philipp-Ballif-Romische-strassen-in-Bosnien-und-der-Hercegovina-1893_opt.pdf#page=77","locator":"Printed p.69 no.46;  of 108","consulted":"Full page image rendered and visually inspected","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."},{"id":"popovic-2019","type":"peer-reviewed scholarly publication","title":"Goran D. Popović, Milestones from the Roman Road Drinjača–Sarajevsko Polje, Collection of Papers of the Faculty of Philosophy XLIX(3), 2019, 201–211","doi":"10.5937/ZRFFP49-23025","url":"https://aseestant.ceon.rs/index.php/zrffp/article/download/23025/8360/","locator":"pp.202–203 for locality, unknown exact position, Volusianus/date; p.209 table1; pp.206–207 for route-level honorary interpretation","consulted":"Full 11-page publisher PDF retrieved; relevant full text inspected"},{"id":"cil-iii-13316","type":"corpus concordance, not newly page-checked","title":"CIL III 13316","url":"https://cil.bbaw.de/en/","locator":"CIL III 13316","consulted":"Concordance supplied by EDCS, EDH and Popović 2019; exact original page not inspected"},{"id":"cil-xvii4-442","type":"corpus concordance, not newly page-checked","title":"CIL XVII 4, 442","url":"https://cil.bbaw.de/en/","locator":"CIL XVII 4, 442; EDH also lists figures alpha/beta","consulted":"Concordance supplied by EDCS/EDH; text and figures not inspected"}],"audit_file":"alignment-lukavac-v9.md","withhold_coordinate":true,"withhold_comparison":true}},{"id":"EDCS-60100066","place":"Karayakup","raw_coordinates":[35.475268,40.3817876],"publication":"RRMAM-03-03, 00026 = AE 2012, 01706","raw_date":[306,307],"location_role":"unverified catalogue locality","coordinate_author":null,"coordinate_accuracy_m":null,"historical_test_eligible":false,"metrics":{"all":{"status":"measured","id":24744,"name":"Tavium-Zela","certainty":"Conjectured","distance_m":18788,"nearest_model_coordinate":[35.534837,40.21885000000001],"author":"Adam Pažout","bibliography":"RRMAM 3.2","start":null,"end":null,"sourceDates":{"lowerDate":0,"lowerDateError":0,"upperDate":0,"upperDateError":0},"source_independence":"unassessed","temporal_compatibility":"not established by geometric proximity"},"Certain":{"status":"measured","id":25115,"name":"Ankyra-Amaseia","certainty":"Certain","distance_m":21198,"nearest_model_coordinate":[35.54823,40.56437100000001],"author":"Adam Pažout","bibliography":"RRMAM 3.3","start":null,"end":null,"sourceDates":{"lowerDate":0,"lowerDateError":0,"upperDate":0,"upperDateError":0},"source_independence":"unassessed","temporal_compatibility":"not established by geometric proximity"},"Conjectured":{"status":"measured","id":24744,"name":"Tavium-Zela","certainty":"Conjectured","distance_m":18788,"nearest_model_coordinate":[35.534837,40.21885000000001],"author":"Adam Pažout","bibliography":"RRMAM 3.2","start":null,"end":null,"sourceDates":{"lowerDate":0,"lowerDateError":0,"upperDate":0,"upperDateError":0},"source_independence":"unassessed","temporal_compatibility":"not established by geometric proximity"},"Hypothetical":{"status":"measured","id":25112,"name":"Amaseia-Gazioura","certainty":"Hypothetical","distance_m":33370,"nearest_model_coordinate":[35.79299699999999,40.559071],"author":"Adam Pažout","bibliography":"RRMAM 3.3","start":null,"end":null,"sourceDates":{"lowerDate":0,"lowerDateError":0,"upperDate":0,"upperDateError":0},"source_independence":"unassessed","temporal_compatibility":"not established by geometric proximity"}},"coordinate_audit":{"reason":"The catalogue village pin cannot represent an original roadside point when the primary publication reports movement from another locality about 8 km north. Neither location has surveyed object coordinates here, and the road association is assumed.","attribution":"The numeric pair is transmitted from the EDCS extract; its individual creator, method and accuracy are unknown. French's dated copying/observation and any reported earlier village origin are object-history evidence, not attribution of these numeric coordinates.","sources":[{"id":"alignment-french2012-rrmam33","title":"David H. French, Roman Roads and Milestones of Asia Minor 3.3: Cappadocia (2012)","url":"https://doi.org/10.18866/BIAA/e-03","archive_url":"https://web.archive.org/web/20150919091733/http://biaa.ac.uk/ckeditor/filemanager/userfiles/3.3%20cappadocia.pdf","locator":"p. 53 no. 026 Karayakup; p. 19 route A.9; plate 7.1.14 on p. 378","consultation":"Full archived publisher PDF retrieved; text on p. 53 extracted and rendered page inspected. Plate reference collated in contents but photograph not used to derive coordinates.","sha256":"32173812d14f60205363fd10756f6f2cff28701c6dbf8b76eb88b3d343004f24","bytes":46687552,"distribution_policy":"Retained research copy outside the published site; link to source, do not redistribute full modern publication."}],"audit_file":"alignment-turkey-v9.md","withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true}},{"id":"EDCS-70200077","place":"Baglica","raw_coordinates":[32.965836,41.536247],"publication":"RRMAM-02-01, 00917 = RRMAM-03-04, 00044c","raw_date":[293,305],"location_role":"unverified catalogue locality","coordinate_author":null,"coordinate_accuracy_m":null,"historical_test_eligible":false,"metrics":{"all":{"status":"measured","id":24162,"name":"Pompeiopolis-Amastris","certainty":"Conjectured","distance_m":11137,"nearest_model_coordinate":[33.055578,41.46206100000001],"author":"Adam Pažout","bibliography":"RRMAM 3.4, TIB 9","start":null,"end":null,"sourceDates":{"lowerDate":0,"lowerDateError":0,"upperDate":0,"upperDateError":0},"source_independence":"unassessed","temporal_compatibility":"not established by geometric proximity"},"Certain":{"status":"beyond-search-radius","distance_m":null,"meaning":"No segment of this class within 50 km; not evidence of road absence"},"Conjectured":{"status":"measured","id":24162,"name":"Pompeiopolis-Amastris","certainty":"Conjectured","distance_m":11137,"nearest_model_coordinate":[33.055578,41.46206100000001],"author":"Adam Pažout","bibliography":"RRMAM 3.4, TIB 9","start":null,"end":null,"sourceDates":{"lowerDate":0,"lowerDateError":0,"upperDate":0,"upperDateError":0},"source_independence":"unassessed","temporal_compatibility":"not established by geometric proximity"},"Hypothetical":{"status":"beyond-search-radius","distance_m":null,"meaning":"No segment of this class within 50 km; not evidence of road absence"}},"coordinate_audit":{"reason":"The raw catalogue pin is not a surveyed findspot and conflicts with the corpus's Boyabat attribution. The object was recorded in Sinop Museum; its village origin rests on a named headman's report, while original erection and route remain uncertain.","attribution":"The numeric pair is transmitted from the EDCS extract; its individual creator, method and accuracy are unknown. French's dated copying/observation and any reported earlier village origin are object-history evidence, not attribution of these numeric coordinates.","sources":[{"id":"alignment-french2013-rrmam34","title":"David H. French, Roman Roads and Milestones of Asia Minor 3.4: Pontus et Bithynia (with Northern Galatia) (2013)","url":"https://doi.org/10.18866/BIAA/e-04","archive_url":"https://web.archive.org/web/20220107225911/https://biaa.ac.uk/ckeditor/filemanager/userfiles/electronic_publications/P_et_B_final.pdf","locator":"pp. 86–87 no. 44(C) Sinop 3; p. 9 sections 3.1 and 3.3; pp. 21–22 route F.2; plate 7.1.31 on p. 194","consultation":"Full publication collated; rendered p. 86 inspected. Archived publisher PDF also retrieved. Map scale convention read directly on p. 9; no numerical original-location coordinates supplied in no. 44(C).","bytes":20868254,"distribution_policy":"Retained research copy outside the published site; link to source, do not redistribute full modern publication."},{"id":"alignment-aydogdu-bakirci2020-baglica","title":"Müjde Aydoğdu and Muzaffer Bakırcı, Analysis of the Attractive Factors in Visiting Rural Areas: The Case of Bağlıca Village (Boyabat/Sinop), Coğrafya Dergisi 40 (2020)","url":"https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2019-0035","download_url":"https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1063019","locator":"p. 4 section 3 and figures 1–2","consultation":"Publisher PDF read and p. 4 rendered: an independent geographical study locates the named village in Boyabat district, five kilometres from Boyabat, beside the Gökırmak. It is a locality check, not milestone findspot evidence or a source of surveyed milestone coordinates."}],"audit_file":"alignment-turkey-v9.md","withhold_coordinate":true,"withhold_comparison":true}}],"source_hashes":{"roads.json":"236858bbf368f939db89d59a89d5b1fdcaa84408d84d3328af3af786b03cb023","milestones.json":"5c3fe98bff6e9beaee6b3801cec5550259e1e156f18e8219fb1564f4f76b3412","cases.json":"dae44b1e2ad6eccaf7037728157990dd96e3ec1d3c6fd0e79f8eca5aa1ee0c22"},"software":{"shapely":"2.0.7","pyproj":"3.6.1"},"lineage":{"audit_date":"2026-10-17","scope":"Coordinate transmission and metadata audit of all 8,483 imported catalogue IDs; source-dependence and feasibility assessment. No new ancient emplacement or survey precision is asserted.","computation":"alignment-lineage-v9-computation.json","reproduction":"python3 tools/audit_alignment_lineage_v9.py","bulk_coordinate_provenance":{"provider":"Epigraphic Database Clauss-Slaby (EDCS)","provider_claim_scope":"Numeric latitude and longitude provided through EDCS map links; does not identify their initial georeferencer or surveyor.","extraction_tool":"Lat/Epig 2.0 / EpigraphyScraperNotebook; local Lat-Epig parse.py reads latitude and longitude out of map.php href attributes.","compiler":"Petra Heřmánková / SDAM","compiler_role":"Author/creator of the 2022 aggregated and cleaned dataset; not demonstrated author of individual coordinate determinations.","extraction_date":"2022-09-12","dataset_doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7072337","actual_import_stage":"EDCS_merged_cleaned_attrs_2022-09-12.json, an intermediate stage rather than the deposit's final text-cleaned filename","raw_transmission_audit":"All 8,483 unique selected IDs have latitude/longitude text identical to their provincial raw TSV rows. The 8,489 matching TSV rows include six exact duplicate rows. All 7,810 mapped atlas numeric coordinate pairs equal their imported source values.","individual_coordinate_creator":null,"individual_coordinate_creation_date":null,"survey_or_georeferencing_method":null,"individual_positional_accuracy_m":null,"individual_coordinate_publication_locator":null,"individual_crs_statement":null,"default_geometry_role":"catalogue-locality","original_emplacement_verified_by_transmission":false,"decimal_places_are_accuracy":false,"source_ids":["edcs2022-deposit","edcs2022-metadata","edcs-etl-readme","edcs-etl-merge","latepig-parser"]},"aggregate":{"catalogue_records":8483,"mapped_records":7810,"unmapped_records":673,"distinct_exact_coordinate_pairs":3178,"single_record_coordinate_pairs":1949,"shared_coordinate_groups":1229,"records_at_shared_coordinate_pairs":5861,"coordinate_group_max":167,"structured_individual_coordinate_creator_records":0,"structured_individual_accuracy_records":0,"interpretation":"Coordinate sharing is an observed dependence warning, not proof that every shared point is a centroid, duplicate physical object, or error. Null lineage fields mean not supplied in the inspected structured source, not disproven existence of an underlying survey."},"road_lineage":{"snapshot":"Local live-platform export route-segments-all-1784029756429.ndjson. Its feature counts are not the 2024 static dataset counts in the 2025 publication.","land_road_segments":15196,"certainty_counts":{"Certain":1082,"Conjectured":13309,"Hypothetical":805},"author_nonempty":15194,"bibliography_nonempty":14702,"date_start_known":510,"date_end_known":214,"author_meaning":"Digitizer/data-record contributor, according to the local data-field document; not automatically an excavator or original road observer.","source_dependency":"Methods explicitly use milestone evidence and LIRE (an EDH/EDCS aggregate). Do not label a particular point-line pair independent without checking its bibliography and construction history.","certainty_semantics":{"Certain":"Documentation and high spatial accuracy category; published guidance is less than 50 m deviation in mountains and less than 200 m in plains, not a per-segment probability distribution.","Conjectured":"Identified roads with lower spatial accuracy/documentation; no universal numeric positional error supplied.","Hypothetical":"Includes identified but unlocated roads, movable/multiple tracks, and proposed roads with insufficient evidence; no universal numeric positional error supplied."},"caution":"The screenshot's brown dashed lines must be read through the selected segment's actual certainty field; not every dashed road is in the Hypothetical category.","source_ids":["itinere-documentation","itinere2025-paper","lire2021-deposit","itinere-local-field-document"]},"feasibility":{"descriptive_screen":"Feasible now: minimum point-to-polyline separation for admitted raw catalogue anchors, stratified by actual road certainty and provenance status. This reports offsets, not historical mismatch.","original_alignment_screen":"Feasible for source-reviewed original or primary roadside locations with defensible geometry and stated uncertainty. Rock-cut form or in-situ language alone does not supply a coordinate or precision.","independent_validation":"Conditional: require independently located physical marker and road evidence, with point-line source dependence checked, plus temporal/identity compatibility. Most bulk coordinates cannot presently qualify.","empire_wide_low_alignment_claim":"Not currently defensible from screenshots or an unstratified catalogue-wide percentage. Moved objects, locality anchors, shared coordinates, sparse road chronology, regional coverage and common source inputs confound it."},"eligibility_gates":[{"id":"identity","requirement":"Milestone identification admissible; exclude falsa, non-milestone reclassifications and conditional transmitted monuments from ordinary alignment analysis. Preserve their raw data and diagnostic access."},{"id":"location_role","requirement":"Separate original emplacement, primary roadside findspot, secondary findspot/reuse, repository, and catalogue locality. Repository or locality offsets remain diagnostic and cannot test ancient alignment."},{"id":"coordinate_source","requirement":"Identify numerical provider, compiler/extractor and original georeferencer separately. Record publication page/figure, plan control points or grid reference; do not treat a general CIL/RIB concordance as a coordinate-specific source."},{"id":"uncertainty","requirement":"Use a published/georeferenced bound with method and source. Leave absent bounds null. Do not invent a 100 m or 1 km radius from coordinate decimal places or a certainty category."},{"id":"road_source","requirement":"Retain road ID, actual certainty, digitizer and bibliography. Compare the nearest road separately from any specifically documented road association."},{"id":"dependence","requirement":"Classify the pair independent, shared-source, or unreviewed. Shared milestone/corpus input prevents use as independent validation, though discrepancies remain informative."},{"id":"chronology","requirement":"Use inscription phases separately; unknown road dates stay unknown. A positive inscription date is not proof that the displayed route alignment existed in the same year."},{"id":"sampling","requirement":"Count both catalogue IDs and distinct anchors. Group repeated physical objects or location assertions after concordance review; bootstrap by site or independent survey unit, not by every reused locality coordinate."}],"recommended_outputs":["Nearest-segment IDs, distances and actual certainty for all-road and each certainty subset, with raw-source coordinates preserved.","Distance bands shown as declared analyst sensitivity choices, not calibrated confidence intervals.","Known point-radius sensitivity: for centreline distance d and justified point radius r, lower=max(0,d-r), upper=d+r. Unknown r yields no bounded interval. If an independently justified road uncertainty exists, show its separate effect; do not manufacture one for conjectured/hypothetical roads.","Flag beyond a chosen tolerance only when the minimum distance after stated uncertainty still exceeds it; label this a discrepancy candidate rather than proof of an erroneous Roman route.","Regional, source-lineage and certainty-stratified summaries with eligible/ineligible/unknown denominators and repeated-coordinate counts.","For a later statistical study, pre-register regional windows and comparison controls matched to site/research density, terrain and recovery processes. Random uniform points and emperor-derived dates are not adequate baselines."],"sources":[{"id":"edcs2022-deposit","url":"https://zenodo.org/records/7072337","locator":"Description; Authors/Creators; files; version 2.0, 12 September 2022","supports":"Dataset creator and date, source attribution, 537262 inscriptions, final text-cleaned filename. Does not identify per-point surveyors."},{"id":"edcs2022-metadata","url":"https://github.com/sdam-au/EDCS_ETL/blob/master/EDCS_2022_dataset_metadata_SDAM.csv#L16-L17","locator":"latitude and longitude rows; file lines 16-17; place row line 4","supports":"Numeric coordinates attributed to EDCS, extraction script attributed to EpigraphyScraperNotebook. No accuracy or original-emplacement guarantee."},{"id":"edcs-etl-readme","url":"https://github.com/sdam-au/EDCS_ETL","locator":"Authors lines 11-12; Original raw data lines 49-56; Data accessing scripts lines 66-81; intermediate-stage input/output lines 84-102","supports":"SDAM compilation role, EDCS HTML -> Lat/Epig provincial TSV -> merged intermediate JSON -> text-cleaned final JSON."},{"id":"edcs-etl-merge","url":"https://github.com/sdam-au/EDCS_ETL/blob/master/scripts/1_1_r_EDCS_merge_clean_attrs.Rmd","locator":"Local lines 26-39 read TSV as character; 67-68 coordinate field descriptions; 96-108 status-derived attributes; 124-126 JSON serialization","supports":"Inspected merge script does not geocode coordinates; all selected raw values additionally checked computationally."},{"id":"latepig-parser","url":"https://github.com/mqAncientHistory/Lat-Epig/blob/main/src/lat_epig/parse.py#L169-L179","locator":"Current upstream lines 169-179; local archived copy lines 182-193","supports":"Reads latitude and longitude text from EDCS map.php links rather than generating coordinates. Local and current upstream line numbers differ; hashes of inspected source edition retained."},{"id":"itinere-documentation","url":"https://itiner-e.org/documentation","locator":"Data creation; Segm. Cert.; Bibliography; Pleiades places","supports":"Source types, certainty categories, segment bibliographies, and separately maintained Pleiades gazetteer coordinates."},{"id":"itinere2025-paper","url":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-025-06140-z","doi":"10.1038/s41597-025-06140-z","locator":"Methods paragraphs beginning 'Milestone data were collected primarily'; 'All such identified features'; 'Certainty categories'; Background chronology caveat","supports":"Milestone/LIRE inputs, source dependence, imprecise milestone locations, lower-documentation categories, limits of empire-wide road chronology. Static publication counts must not be conflated with the local live export."},{"id":"lire2021-deposit","url":"https://zenodo.org/records/5074774","locator":"Description, version v1.0.0, 6 July 2021","supports":"LIRE is an aggregate of EDCS and EDH, with geolocation and chronology selection; corroborates possible shared upstream source lineage."},{"id":"itinere-local-field-document","url":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17122148","locator":"Table 1, Citation and Bibliography rows; Certainty categories paragraph","supports":"Citation/author is digitizer; bibliography names sources used for digitization. Supplied field document is preserved and hashed separately from the live export."}],"raw_policy":"No source, atlas point coordinates, names, dates, text or road geometry were modified by this audit. Research JSON contains supplementary provenance and methodological judgments only."},"audit_input_hashes":{"alignment-lineage-v9.json":"f2dcc67858ca03dd1662abc0940eca3a401d246b00d75198ea257a57138a79db","alignment-lukavac-v9.json":"4df2f93441a12bb975e35fcc5f5350756bd824fcbcb10abb581a38b3517d2fb4","alignment-turkey-v9.json":"fe4c923b0d69faaa153172a46601b0d5d2802010ec81ab0cd638db29be594079","catalogue-coordinate-review-v9.json":"529f7f9ed48fcad42d3e263188ccb92b184de64649307afcf534fa8b3245fc0f"}}