{"edition":"Catalogue review with coordinate provenance pilot v9, 17 October 2026","scope":"All 8,483 rows screened; targeted publication checks only. Screening is not authentication.","screening_rule":"Flags identify review candidates, never automatic exclusions or redatings. Broad means at least 100 inclusive historical years in a bounded source component, omitting year zero.","review_inputs":[{"file":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8.json","sha256":"411677247b9e4864fa28ee4a4714ea3105ed1f783248becfa9bda1d88aeff69b"},{"file":"catalogue-cil-identity-v8.json","sha256":"8b58cc64939e7cb0bff941598147a8f1cccc9bd90d9e9e48bcfe3bf07c582a59"},{"file":"catalogue-dating-review-v8.json","sha256":"cf31088b9b966d5b647349d0b43af94d36c7e0ca333edaa71700038c4874346d"},{"file":"catalogue-roadworks-review-v8.json","sha256":"9bf67ae83c8c4a7e94e7f98fb34a4fde40f65f41da5457869d0881b811928e61"},{"file":"catalogue-coordinate-review-v9.json","sha256":"529f7f9ed48fcad42d3e263188ccb92b184de64649307afcf534fa8b3245fc0f"}],"records":{"EDCS-44600074":{"level":"excluded","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reviews":[{"id":"legacy-authenticity-EDCS-44600074","level":"excluded","status":"rejected-falsum","label":"RIB 2392*: Falsum; milestone identification unproved","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reason":"RIB classifies this as a falsum, gives no date, lists the origin among unsited falsa, and regards the old milestone identification as unproved. The Donnington catalogue coordinate and empty chronology do not establish an ancient British milestone.","source":{"title":"Roman Inscriptions of Britain, RIB 2392*, Falsum","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2392","locator":"Title; Support: type, site, modern location; Text: type/date; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus entry fetched and read on 17 October 2026; EDH HD071502 local commentary independently records Fälschung. No new object autopsy."},"display_policy":"Hide from ordinary milestone results; retain raw record and provide an explicitly labelled diagnostic opt-in and search access. Never use for road-distance or historical chronological inference.","sources":[{"title":"Roman Inscriptions of Britain, RIB 2392*, Falsum","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2392","locator":"Title; Support: type, site, modern location; Text: type/date; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus entry fetched and read on 17 October 2026; EDH HD071502 local commentary independently records Fälschung. No new object autopsy."}]},{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-44600074","status":"rejected-falsum","label":"Donnington: RIB 2392* Falsum; milestone identification unproved","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reason":"RIB places the record among Falsa, identifies the support as unknown, gives no inscription date and preserves Haverfield’s warning that the item remains unproven. Falsum is an editorial category that includes several kinds of rejected evidence and is not by itself proof of deliberate modern forgery.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2392","locator":"Title; Support > Type of object; Text > Date; Commentary and notes","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"safest to consider the item as unproven till further evidence emerges","response_sha256":"5a043e71a3edf815a0e4b218356872f683aeaf20cb4d73eab39399b8f4ddec45","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-44600074-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2392"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"RIB-01, 02392*","province":"Britannia","place":"Donnington","coordinates":[-2.6212479,52.6673001],"start":null,"end":null,"rawDating":null,"sourceDates":{"dating_from":null,"dating_to":null,"date_not_before":null,"date_not_after":null}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","existing_v7_exclusion":true,"recommended_action":"Retain the existing targeted exclusion; do not relabel the source category as a demonstrated intentional forgery.","level":"excluded"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-09700636":{"level":"excluded","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-09700636","status":"rejected-misidentification","label":"Vindolanda: published as a milestone, reclassified as uninscribed column/pilaster","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reason":"RIB explicitly cross-references AE 1971, 224 and rejects both the inscription and milestone identification. The published cylinder measures 0.22 m in diameter and 1.33 m high; RIB interprets it as a monolithic column or pilaster. The catalogue’s reconstructed text and 122–300 envelope must remain visible as superseded raw data, not historical milestone evidence.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/milestones","locator":"Other Monuments Excluded from RIB, Vindolanda cylindrical stone paragraph (Britannia 1 (1970), 311, No. 21 = AE 1971, 224; Britannia 3 (1972), 363(d))","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary corpus editorial reclassification","shortExtract":"is actually not inscribed","response_sha256":"f95ab28a32f435e0ddd806f5e6b628ab3ed17d2b5900f7b5471750098a24e922","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-09700636-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/milestones"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"AE 1971, 00224","province":"Britannia","place":"Chesterholm / Vindolanda","coordinates":[-2.3614793,54.9907264],"start":122,"end":300,"rawDating":"122 to 300","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"122","dating_to":"300","date_not_before":"122","date_not_after":"300"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","authenticity":"No finding of deliberate forgery; object identification and inscription rejected","recommended_action":"Exclude from ordinary milestone results, chronology counts and road comparisons; allow diagnostic display with reason and source.","level":"excluded"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901028":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901028","status":"identification-uncertain","label":"RIB 2219: milestone identification qualified","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reason":"The corpus title explicitly qualifies the object as a milestone. A modern inscription was cut across two lines; this alteration does not invalidate the ancient inscription. Retain the record with its qualified identification and documented modern intervention.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2219","locator":"Title; Commentary and notes","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"Milestone(?) of Flavius Severus and Maximinus Daia","response_sha256":"83c198ba0ed7517962aa44eba8cc2a3caddc17eaae4113729005e015ff6f5443","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901028-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2219"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"RIB-01, 02219","province":"Britannia","place":"Warren","coordinates":[0.4355572,51.4149536],"start":305,"end":306,"rawDating":"305 to 306","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"305","dating_to":"306","date_not_before":"305","date_not_after":"306"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","recommended_action":"Show an identification warning; retain as a qualified milestone candidate.","level":"caution"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901117":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901117","status":"identification-uncertain","label":"RIB 2314: milestone(?), findspot unknown, lost","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reason":"RIB qualifies the support as milestone(?), supplies no fixed findspot, and records that it is lost. The manuscript frame is treated as an ansate panel rather than the full outline of the support. The fourth-century textual-context dating is a separate, broader inference; it does not establish a road alignment or identification.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2314","locator":"Title; Support > Type of object / Find context / Modern location; Text > Date; Commentary and notes","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"Milestone(?)","response_sha256":"b9c2fb7861aa6432113b85e7352075db123b3d1980cb252e70b54b825cd653d3","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901117-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2314"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"CIL 07, 01189 = RIB-01, 02314","province":"Britannia","place":"?","coordinates":null,"start":101,"end":400,"rawDating":"101 to 400","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"101","dating_to":"400","date_not_before":"101","date_not_after":"400"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","recommended_action":"Retain a visibly qualified candidate; do not use an unknown findspot or illustrated frame to infer a roadside setting.","level":"caution"},{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901117","identifiers":["CIL 07, 01189 = RIB-01, 02314"],"level":"caution","subtype":"published-century-vs-broad-catalogue","decision":"use-RIB-fourth-century-date-with-identification-caution","reason":"RIB supplies a fourth-century date by textual context. The title retains a question mark after milestone; dating the text does not settle its object identification or ancient location.","raw_snapshot":{"start":101,"end":400,"rawDating":"101 to 400","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"101","dating_to":"400","date_not_before":"101","date_not_after":"400"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2314-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2314. Milestone?","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2314","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"b9c2fb7861aa6432113b85e7352075db123b3d1980cb252e70b54b825cd653d3"}],"chronology":{"policy":"publication-components","phases":[{"start":301,"end":400,"label":"RIB 2314: fourth-century formula","basis":"RIB Text Date, textual context; 301–400 renders the published century at year granularity.","source_ids":["rib-2314-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"bounded","qualification":"Milestone identification remains questioned; century-level date."}],"reason":"RIB supplies a fourth-century date by textual context. The title retains a question mark after milestone; dating the text does not settle its object identification or ancient location.","source_ids":["rib-2314-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901117"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901074":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901074","status":"possible-duplicate","label":"Ribchester: RIB 2268 and 2269 may describe one stone","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reason":"RIB explicitly allows the two antiquarian records to refer to the same stone, while noting that the recorded texts do not tally. Preserve both catalogue rows and their source histories; no forced merge or unilateral exclusion is supported. Treat them as a possible duplicate group, not two independently demonstrated objects.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2268","locator":"Commentary and notes","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"It may be the same as RIB 2269","response_sha256":"dfb27f1ef1bd0cf5f822f451b97de379cc711dc7cb54c812f5a71fc17d3bf8d7","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901074-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2268"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"CIL 07, 01171a = RIB-01, 02268","province":"Britannia","place":"Ribchester / Bremetennacum","coordinates":[-2.536348,53.8121041],"start":249,"end":251,"rawDating":"249 to 251","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"249","dating_to":"251","date_not_before":"249","date_not_after":"251"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","related_records":["EDCS-07901074","EDCS-07901075"],"duplicate_group":"ribchester-rib2268-2269-unresolved","recommended_action":"Display a possible-duplicate warning and linked record; do not claim two securely distinct stones.","level":"caution"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901075":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901075","status":"possible-duplicate","label":"Ribchester: RIB 2268 and 2269 may describe one stone","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reason":"RIB explicitly allows the two antiquarian records to refer to the same stone, while noting that the recorded texts do not tally. Preserve both catalogue rows and their source histories; no forced merge or unilateral exclusion is supported. Treat them as a possible duplicate group, not two independently demonstrated objects.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2269","locator":"Commentary and notes","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"It may be the same as RIB 2268","response_sha256":"d46ec77ef8784a54ac953858374ff6699d957337038d381d8f41050aa0e49e35","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901075-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2269"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"CIL 07, 01171b = RIB-01, 02269","province":"Britannia","place":"Ribchester / Bremetennacum","coordinates":[-2.536348,53.8121041],"start":238,"end":244,"rawDating":"238 to 244","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"238","dating_to":"244","date_not_before":"238","date_not_after":"244"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","related_records":["EDCS-07901074","EDCS-07901075"],"duplicate_group":"ribchester-rib2268-2269-unresolved","recommended_action":"Display a possible-duplicate warning and linked record; do not claim two securely distinct stones.","level":"caution"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07800337":{"level":"reviewed-control","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07800337","status":"retained-control","label":"RIB 98: revised interpretation retains milestone identification","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reason":"An older RIB objection based on the villa find context is explicitly superseded by the 1995 addenda after comparable milestones were discovered reused at Rockbourne. Retaining this record is supported by the updated corpus. Reuse at a villa is not evidence that the object was originally installed there.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/98","locator":"Commentary and notes > Addenda from RIB+add. (1995)","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"this too should be seen as a milestone","response_sha256":"f95c4a4d6bbd9d478fbafa43e7f7ff2f0192b8e9257bd311a47ce2f4da566f04","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07800337-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/98"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"CIL 07, 00004 = RIB-01, 00098","province":"Britannia","place":"Clanville","coordinates":[-1.5439705,51.2403483],"start":282,"end":283,"rawDating":"282 to 283","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"282","dating_to":"283","date_not_before":"282","date_not_after":"283"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","recommended_action":"Retain; show the revision rather than applying a keyword rejection to older doubts.","level":"reviewed-control"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07800881":{"level":"reviewed-control","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07800881","status":"retained-control","label":"RIB 598: addenda identify a milestone of Decius","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reason":"The original uncertainty about the sandstone fragment is superseded by the corpus addenda, which identify it as part of a milestone of Decius. Its find context is a guard chamber at the fort’s west gate, not proof of primary roadside position.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/598","locator":"Commentary and notes > Addenda from RIB+add. (1995)","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"part of a milestone of Decius","response_sha256":"d6100ac11c80ef9d338dd623639db3e0e7dc18afb5d9880b7c6433e40b36b3b8","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07800881-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/598"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"RIB-01, 00598","province":"Britannia","place":"Ribchester / Bremetennacum","coordinates":[-2.536348,53.8121041],"start":249,"end":251,"rawDating":"249 to 251","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"249","dating_to":"251","date_not_before":"249","date_not_after":"251"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","recommended_action":"Retain; preserve the distinction between revised object identification and reused find context.","level":"reviewed-control"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901038":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901038","status":"retained-with-source-conflict","label":"RIB 2229: secondary milestone; date field conflicts with commentary","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reason":"RIB accepts the stone’s secondary use as a milestone, although its primary use appears architectural. Its Text > Date field currently reads 315–316, whereas the emperor identification and Commentary date Flavius Severus as Caesar to 1 May 305–25 July 306. Do not adopt the conflicting date field silently or classify architectural reuse as a false milestone.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2229","locator":"Support > Decoration and iconography; Text > Date; Commentary and notes","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"Flavius Severus was Caesar 1 May 305-25 July 306.","response_sha256":"b4ae942f24611c3bcf7e5cb051a28d050098a2647474bb4f661b56ea79b8cb2b","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901038-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2229"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"RIB-01, 02229 = AE 1931, 00007","province":"Britannia","place":"Venn Ottery","coordinates":[-3.3052343,50.7131325],"start":305,"end":306,"rawDating":"305 to 306","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"305","dating_to":"306","date_not_before":"305","date_not_after":"306"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","recommended_action":"Retain the catalogue’s 305–306 interpretation with an explicit primary-corpus internal-conflict note; date agent supplies filter overlay.","level":"caution"},{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901038","identifiers":["RIB-01, 02229 = AE 1931, 00007"],"level":"caution","subtype":"internal-RIB-date-disagreement","decision":"retain-catalogue-range-and-show-RIB-internal-conflict","reason":"The raw 305–306 agrees with RIB Commentary, which specifies Flavius Severus as Caesar from 1 May 305 to 25 July 306. The same RIB page Date field says 315–316. Do not replace the range from that conflicting field or merge them into 305–316.","raw_snapshot":{"start":305,"end":306,"rawDating":"305 to 306","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"305","dating_to":"306","date_not_before":"305","date_not_after":"306"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2229-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2229. Milestone of Flavius Severus","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2229","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"b4ae942f24611c3bcf7e5cb051a28d050098a2647474bb4f661b56ea79b8cb2b"}],"reported_alternatives":[{"start":305,"end":306,"label":"RIB Commentary; agrees with catalogue","source_ids":["rib-2229-dating-v8"]},{"start":315,"end":316,"label":"Conflicting RIB Date field","status":"Unresolved internal source metadata conflict","source_ids":["rib-2229-dating-v8"]}],"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901038"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901116":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901116","status":"location-conflict","label":"RIB 2313: Ingliston evidence supersedes catalogue Cramond locality","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reason":"RIB explicitly replaces the old Cramond attribution with Ingliston. Maxwell places the approximate discovery area around the Newbridge standing stones (NGR NT 123 726), but states that the exact original spot cannot now be ascertained. The raw Cramond coordinate is unsupported as this stone’s findspot and should be withheld from ordinary spatial comparison without deleting it. No replacement point is authorized by this audit.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2313","locator":"Support > Find context; Commentary and notes; Bibliography","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"At Ingliston","response_sha256":"7e08e3eed03b36416bf0498a415ce4e9918a04a60a8665e16cd8afb3f781b619","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901116-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2313"},{"url":"https://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/psas/article/download/9126/9094/9080","locator":"G. S. Maxwell, Two inscribed Roman stones and architectural fragments from Scotland, PSAS 113 (1983), pp. 379, 381–383","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Full publication consulted, ","shortExtract":"There is probably no way in which we can now ascertain the exact spot","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901116-source-2","title":"https://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/psas/article/download/9126/9094/9080"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"CIL 07, 01085 = RIB-01, 02313 = CSIR-GB-01-04, 00066 = Britannia-1973-336 = Chiron-1977-390 = AE 1975, 00581","province":"Britannia","place":"Cramond / Horrea Classis","coordinates":[-3.3067256,55.9711016],"start":140,"end":144,"rawDating":"140 to 144","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"140","dating_to":"144","date_not_before":"140","date_not_after":"144"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","withhold_coordinate":true,"coordinate_reason":"RIB’s updated find context is Ingliston, superseding the older Cramond attribution; Maxwell 1983 pp.379 and382 gives only an approximate Newbridge area and says the exact original spot is unknown. Preserve raw Cramond coordinate but withhold from mapping and road-distance tests.","recommended_action":"Keep milestone identity and existing 140–144 date; withhold the raw coordinate with a visible locality-conflict reason.","level":"caution"}],"withhold_coordinate":true,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-44600268":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-44600268","status":"original-setting-uncertain","label":"RIB 3523: road association retained, original placement uncertain","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reason":"The corpus links the stone to Margary 67c, but the spacing between its findspot and the RIB 2265/2266 findspot is less than one Roman mile; at least one stone may have moved before discovery. A second face is probably later imperial reuse, but the emperor is unidentified. Neither an exact primary setting nor a date for that later inscription is established.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/3523","locator":"Support > Find context; Commentary and notes","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"one milestone or the others may not have been in their original position when found","response_sha256":"f60ea51c8a4dcb2cba1e7675a377e9231d055523f7b35fa72c492f3d0c56f126","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-44600268-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/3523"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"RIB-03, 03523","province":"Britannia","place":"Aber","coordinates":[-3.99615,53.240752],"start":261,"end":262,"rawDating":"261 to 262","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"261","dating_to":"262","date_not_before":"261","date_not_after":"262"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","recommended_action":"Display moved-context risk and undated later-inscription warning; do not promote the point to a primary in-situ road marker.","level":"caution"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-08300451":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-08300451","status":"attribution-probable","label":"RIB 3516: Gordian III attribution is probable","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reason":"RIB treats the emperor as probably Gordian III, inferred from the fragmentary text and comparison with the Bitterne series. Find context is above the fill of a late fourth-century ditch; that archaeological context does not date the inscription to the fourth century. Recutting may reflect reuse as a pillar base.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/3516","locator":"Title; Support > Condition / Find context; Commentary and notes","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"The emperor was probably Gordian III","response_sha256":"36441211e182726809c6cea3b715eac5d1e8494befa571e38630e58cd4a7832d","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-08300451-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/3516"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"RIB-03, 03516 = AE 1985, 00639","province":"Britannia","place":"Wonston","coordinates":[-1.3257885,51.1525161],"start":238,"end":244,"rawDating":"238 to 244","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"238","dating_to":"244","date_not_before":"238","date_not_after":"244"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","recommended_action":"Retain a visibly probable 238–244 attribution; keep inscription date distinct from depositional context.","level":"caution"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901100":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901100","status":"attribution-probable","label":"RIB 2297: probable Maximinus Daia; primary text remains undated","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reason":"The title and commentary qualify the emperor identification. The stone also preserves traces of a primary inscription; the documented 309–313 proposal relates to the secondary text and does not date all use of the object.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2297","locator":"Title; Commentary and notes","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"Probably Maximinus Daia, a.d. 309-13","response_sha256":"b51e175b72b5fc349427ca9c96f7c7832c5436602a2ee0430ba3390571ab6e3c","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901100-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2297"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"CIL 07, 01350 = RIB-01, 02297","province":"Britannia","place":"Corbridge / Coria / Corstopitum","coordinates":[-2.0176907,54.9740669],"start":309,"end":313,"rawDating":"309 to 313","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"309","dating_to":"313","date_not_before":"309","date_not_after":"313"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","recommended_action":"Show the probable attribution and undated primary-phase warning; no authentication rejection.","level":"caution"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901108":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901108","status":"distance-reading-uncertain","label":"RIB 2305: visible letters do not establish a league or mile count","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reason":"RIB discusses several readings of the lower letters and finds no convincing British league count or identifiable departure point for the proposed numeral. It also allows a builder’s setting instruction. Retain the fragment as a milestone candidate, but do not convert these letters into a reliable geographic anchor.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2305","locator":"Commentary and notes","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"Perhaps, then, they represent a builder’s instruction","response_sha256":"5dea757a5678939e4168fa6bda0f63fe431d242c695dc147bb2061b86a65cc70","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901108-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2305"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"RIB-01, 02305","province":"Britannia","place":"Crindledykes Farm / Vindolanda","coordinates":[-2.340712,54.99549],"start":101,"end":350,"rawDating":"101 to 350","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"101","dating_to":"350","date_not_before":"101","date_not_after":"350"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","recommended_action":"Show distance-reading uncertainty; do not use the proposed numeral to reconstruct an origin or road alignment.","level":"caution"},{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901108","identifiers":["RIB-01, 02305"],"level":"caution","subtype":"published-undated-vs-numeric-catalogue","decision":"withhold-catalogue-range-from-positive-date-matches","reason":"The edition supplies no inscription date. RIB questions the interpretation of the low letters or numeral; no emperor-based date can be recovered.","raw_snapshot":{"start":101,"end":350,"rawDating":"101 to 350","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"101","dating_to":"350","date_not_before":"101","date_not_after":"350"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2305-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2305. Fragmentary milestone","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2305","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"5dea757a5678939e4168fa6bda0f63fe431d242c695dc147bb2061b86a65cc70"}],"chronology":{"policy":"uncertainty-only","phases":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"RIB 2305: ancient inscription undated","basis":"The edition supplies no inscription date. RIB questions the interpretation of the low letters or numeral; no emperor-based date can be recovered.","source_ids":["rib-2305-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"undated"}],"reason":"The edition supplies no inscription date. RIB questions the interpretation of the low letters or numeral; no emperor-based date can be recovered.","source_ids":["rib-2305-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901108"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901069":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901069","status":"road-association-uncertain","label":"RIB 2263: reused stone with alternative road associations","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reason":"The updated corpus places the reused find at a hut-group at Cae’r-bythod and corrects the older Dinas Dinorwic attribution. Derivation from the Segontium–Kanovium road would involve movement; a local branch road serving slate quarries is an alternative proposed in the commentary. Neither road is independently established by this point.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2263","locator":"Commentary and notes","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"found reused in a hut-group at Cae’r-bythod","response_sha256":"6e4f1f1e1b166ab0398de2e27168a12514b163d1ed68a513899773397ae11d3e","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-07901069-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2263"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"CIL 07, 01163 = RIB-01, 02263 = Afrique p 724","province":"Britannia","place":"Cae'r-bythod / Segontium","coordinates":[-4.1415711,53.1480869],"start":249,"end":251,"rawDating":"249 to 251","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"249","dating_to":"251","date_not_before":"249","date_not_after":"251"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","recommended_action":"Retain milestone identity; show find context as reuse and road association as unresolved.","level":"caution"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-71300137":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-71300137","status":"alternative-dating","label":"Ribchester Brit.45.6: alternative rulers and date windows","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reason":"The surviving Maximian name allows Maximian during 286–305 or 307–308; Galerius Maximianus during 305–311 is a less likely alternative in the corpus commentary. The source’s 286–311 envelope compresses different ruler hypotheses. The object was reused as a gatepost beside a presumed road line, not found proven in its primary position. The online Brit.45.6 record is explicitly provisional.","sources":[{"url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/Brit.45.6","locator":"Provisional notice; Text > Date; Commentary and notes; Bibliography","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Primary epigraphic corpus record","shortExtract":"Milestone of Maximian","response_sha256":"c0cfc330a66562cb4e3e0b4985520f187323db58dbb5624409fc023b23fa08ac","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-71300137-source-1","title":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/Brit.45.6"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068113X14000403","locator":"R. S. O. Tomlin, Britannia 45 (2014), Roman Britain in 2013: III. Inscriptions, notes15–16","consulted":"2026-10-17","evidenceRole":"Publisher footnotes consulted; full paid article not claimed","id":"catalogue-rib-audit-v8-EDCS-71300137-source-2","title":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068113X14000403"}],"source_snapshot":{"publication":"AE 2014, 00801","province":"Britannia","place":"Ribchester / Bremetennacum","coordinates":[-2.536348,53.8121041],"start":286,"end":311,"rawDating":"286 to 311","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"286","dating_to":"311","date_not_before":"286","date_not_after":"311"}},"evidenceStatus":"Publication-supported audit interpretation; no autopsy of object","raw_policy":"Preserve source record and source coordinates; apply a separately documented audit overlay only.","recommended_action":"Display ruler/date alternatives and reuse; preserve the raw envelope, avoid treating it as one continuous construction or use period.","level":"caution"},{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-71300137","identifiers":["AE 2014, 00801"],"level":"caution","subtype":"alternative-identifications-collapsed-to-one-envelope","decision":"withhold-catalogue-envelope-and-show-competing-ruler-datings","reason":"The provisional RIB record gives no date in its Date field. Commentary distinguishes Maximian in 286–305 or 307–308 and, less likely, Galerius in 305–311. These are competing identifications, not three observed successive texts. Raw 286–311 must not imply a single established span.","raw_snapshot":{"start":286,"end":311,"rawDating":"286 to 311","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"286","dating_to":"311","date_not_before":"286","date_not_after":"311"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-Brit45-6-dating-v8","title":"RIB Online, Brit. 45.6: Milestone of Maximian","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/Brit.45.6","locator":"Provisional-record notice; Text Date; Commentary paragraphs 1–2","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected online; page explicitly provisional. Shotter–Tostevin 2011 article is cited there but not independently consulted.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"c0cfc330a66562cb4e3e0b4985520f187323db58dbb5624409fc023b23fa08ac"}],"chronology":{"policy":"uncertainty-only","phases":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"Ribchester Maximian fragment: identification-dependent chronology","basis":"RIB Date unspecified; Commentary provides alternative imperial identities and periods, not one established date.","source_ids":["rib-Brit45-6-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"undated","qualification":"Provisional corpus record; alternative ruler identifications remain unresolved."}],"reason":"The provisional RIB record gives no date in its Date field. Commentary distinguishes Maximian in 286–305 or 307–308 and, less likely, Galerius in 305–311. These are competing identifications, not three observed successive texts. Raw 286–311 must not imply a single established span.","source_ids":["rib-Brit45-6-dating-v8"]},"reported_alternatives":[{"start":286,"end":305,"label":"Maximian first western Augustan period (publication alternative)","source_ids":["rib-Brit45-6-dating-v8"]},{"start":307,"end":308,"label":"Maximian later period (publication alternative)","source_ids":["rib-Brit45-6-dating-v8"]},{"start":305,"end":311,"label":"Galerius Maximianus (less likely in RIB)","source_ids":["rib-Brit45-6-dating-v8"]}],"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-71300137"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-29900424":{"level":"excluded","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-cil-identity-v8-EDCS-29900424","level":"excluded","status":"rejected-falsum","label":"CIL II 464*: fabricated transmitted text","reason":"CIL explicitly rejects the paired texts 464* and 465* as fabricated from Hadrianic coins and literary accounts of debt remission, and withdraws the idea that genuine milestones underlie them. Locality metadata cannot authenticate the claimed ancient roadside monument.","decision":"CIL explicitly rejects the paired texts 464* and 465* as fabricated from Hadrianic coins and literary accounts of debt remission, and withdraws the idea that genuine milestones underlie them. Locality metadata cannot authenticate the claimed ancient roadside monument.","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"sources":[{"id":"cilII","title":"E. Hübner, CIL II (1869), Inscriptiones falsae vel alienae, p. 45*, nos. 464*–467*","url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2027/umn.31951001453302","locator":"Appendix p. 45*, local ; appendix title local ","image":"research/catalogue-audit-v8-evidence/cil-ii-1869-p45star.png","consultation":"Exact appendix title and p. 45* rendered and visually read. Handle read from scan watermark; web tool could not open handle. Local full source checked.","page_image":"evidence/cil-ii-1869-p45star.png","image_sha256":"40a30ad4b88349cca617a0d49bbd05efcdc002d3f4ef4adca08ad9e187f7a95f","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."}],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-17","limits":"No object autopsy; claims limited to exact cited evidence.","locator":"p. 45*, nos. 464*–465*, joint commentary below no. 465*","raw_catalogue":{"publication":"CIL 02, *00464 = CIL 17-01, *00046 = CIL 02-13, *00029 = MiliariTarrac 00273","province":"Hispania citerior","place":"Alconchel de la Estrella","coordinates":[-2.5743398,39.7190283],"start":null,"end":null,"rawDating":null,"text":"Imp(erator) Caesar d(ivi) Nervae / Traiani f(ilius) (!) Nervae n(epos) / Hadrianus Traianus Aug(ustus) / Dacicus maximus Britan/nicus maximus Germanicus / maxumis pontifex maximus trib(unicia) / potes(tate) II co(n)s(ul) II p(ater) p(atriae) praeter quam / quod provinciis remisit decies / novies centena mil{l}ia n(ummum) / sibi debita a Munda et fluvio / sigila ad Certiman usque / XX m(ilia) p(assuum) p(ecunia) s(ua) / restituit"}}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-29900423":{"level":"excluded","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-cil-identity-v8-EDCS-29900423","level":"excluded","status":"rejected-falsum","label":"CIL II 465*: fabricated transmitted text","reason":"CIL explicitly rejects the paired texts 464* and 465* as fabricated from Hadrianic coins and literary accounts. Preserve the transmission and its rejection; do not infer ancient road mileage or invent a fabrication year.","decision":"CIL explicitly rejects the paired texts 464* and 465* as fabricated from Hadrianic coins and literary accounts. Preserve the transmission and its rejection; do not infer ancient road mileage or invent a fabrication year.","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"sources":[{"id":"cilII","title":"E. Hübner, CIL II (1869), Inscriptiones falsae vel alienae, p. 45*, nos. 464*–467*","url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2027/umn.31951001453302","locator":"Appendix p. 45*, local ; appendix title local ","image":"research/catalogue-audit-v8-evidence/cil-ii-1869-p45star.png","consultation":"Exact appendix title and p. 45* rendered and visually read. Handle read from scan watermark; web tool could not open handle. Local full source checked.","page_image":"evidence/cil-ii-1869-p45star.png","image_sha256":"40a30ad4b88349cca617a0d49bbd05efcdc002d3f4ef4adca08ad9e187f7a95f","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."}],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-17","limits":"No object autopsy; claims limited to exact cited evidence.","locator":"p. 45*, nos. 464*–465*, joint commentary","raw_catalogue":{"publication":"CIL 17-01, *00047 = CIL 02, *00465 = CIL 02-13, *00033 = MiliariTarrac 00272","province":"Hispania citerior","place":"Villarejo de la Penuela","coordinates":[-2.4098217,40.0878631],"start":null,"end":null,"rawDating":null,"text":"Imp(erator) Caes(ar) divi Nervae / Traiani (!) Nervae n(epos) / Hadrianus Traianus Aug(ustus) / Dacicus maximus Britan/nicus maximus Germanicus / maxumis pontifex maximus / trib(unicia) pot(estate) IIII imp(erator) IIII co(n)s(ul) IIII / p(ater) p(atriae) a Certima m(ilia) / p(assuum) DX / restituit impensa sua"}}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-29900452":{"level":"excluded","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-cil-identity-v8-EDCS-29900452","level":"excluded","status":"rejected-interpolated-transmission","label":"CIL II 467*: certainly interpolated transmission","reason":"Hübner explicitly calls the transmitted Carthaginian text certainly interpolated. Withhold this unverified record from milestone analysis. This is a verdict on transmitted wording, not proof that an otherwise unidentified whole stone was manufactured in modern times.","decision":"Hübner explicitly calls the transmitted Carthaginian text certainly interpolated. Withhold this unverified record from milestone analysis. This is a verdict on transmitted wording, not proof that an otherwise unidentified whole stone was manufactured in modern times.","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"sources":[{"id":"cilII","title":"E. Hübner, CIL II (1869), Inscriptiones falsae vel alienae, p. 45*, nos. 464*–467*","url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2027/umn.31951001453302","locator":"Appendix p. 45*, local ; appendix title local ","image":"research/catalogue-audit-v8-evidence/cil-ii-1869-p45star.png","consultation":"Exact appendix title and p. 45* rendered and visually read. Handle read from scan watermark; web tool could not open handle. Local full source checked.","page_image":"evidence/cil-ii-1869-p45star.png","image_sha256":"40a30ad4b88349cca617a0d49bbd05efcdc002d3f4ef4adca08ad9e187f7a95f","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."}],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-17","limits":"No object autopsy; claims limited to exact cited evidence.","locator":"p. 45*, no. 467*, concluding comment","raw_catalogue":{"publication":"CIL 02, *00467 = CIL 17-01, *00008","province":"Hispania citerior","place":"Mazarron / Almazarron / Municipium Ficariense / Carthago Nova","coordinates":[-1.3138511,37.5986534],"start":null,"end":null,"rawDating":null,"text":"imp caes d f / cons XI / trib pot XVI / p m XVIII m / lucc a eliocr / f c"}}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-67100113":{"level":"excluded","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-cil-identity-v8-EDCS-67100113","level":"excluded","status":"cil-rejected-tradition","label":"CIL II 466*: rejected corpus tradition","reason":"The Constantine roadwork report is in CIL II’s Inscriptiones falsae vel alienae appendix. It is a manuscript tradition; no original stone was inspected here. Withhold it from authenticated milestone inference pending positive modern reassessment. The alleged year 333 is not a secure stone date.","decision":"The Constantine roadwork report is in CIL II’s Inscriptiones falsae vel alienae appendix. It is a manuscript tradition; no original stone was inspected here. Withhold it from authenticated milestone inference pending positive modern reassessment. The alleged year 333 is not a secure stone date.","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"sources":[{"id":"cilII","title":"E. Hübner, CIL II (1869), Inscriptiones falsae vel alienae, p. 45*, nos. 464*–467*","url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2027/umn.31951001453302","locator":"Appendix p. 45*, local ; appendix title local ","image":"research/catalogue-audit-v8-evidence/cil-ii-1869-p45star.png","consultation":"Exact appendix title and p. 45* rendered and visually read. Handle read from scan watermark; web tool could not open handle. Local full source checked.","page_image":"evidence/cil-ii-1869-p45star.png","image_sha256":"40a30ad4b88349cca617a0d49bbd05efcdc002d3f4ef4adca08ad9e187f7a95f","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."}],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-17","limits":"Corpus rejection is verified; a specific modern fabrication event and manufacture date are not established.","locator":"Appendix title ; p. 45*, no. 466* and manuscript source","raw_catalogue":{"publication":"CIL 02, *00466 = CIL 17-01, *00037","province":"Hispania citerior","place":"Vilches, iuxta / Baesucci","coordinates":[-3.512583,38.204722],"start":null,"end":null,"rawDating":null,"text":"imp cae flavius constantinus / aug pacis et iustitiae cultor pub quetis / fundator religionis fidei autor remiss u/bique finitim provinc iter restitui descre/vit in betula urbe introrsus montis castulonensis / an CCCXXXIII"},"locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-09100349":{"level":"excluded","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-cil-identity-v8-EDCS-09100349","level":"excluded","status":"misidentified-honorific","label":"Saguntum: reused column with honorific inscription","reason":"CIL II²/14,318 explicitly classifies this as titulus honorarius and describes an architectural column later used as a statue base. The first months of 283 date the imperial dedication, not a milestone or road-construction event.","decision":"CIL II²/14,318 explicitly classifies this as titulus honorarius and describes an architectural column later used as a statue base. The first months of 283 date the imperial dedication, not a milestone or road-construction event.","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"sources":[{"id":"saguntum","title":"G. Alföldy et al., CIL II²/14,1 (1995), p. 70, no. 318","url":"https://cil.bbaw.de/ace/","locator":"p. 70, no. 318, local ","consultation":"Exact local modern CIL page rendered and visually read; no redistribution of modern scan.","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."}],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-17","limits":"No object autopsy; claims limited to exact cited evidence.","locator":"p. 70, no. 318, heading, support description and final dating commentary","chronology_note":"Retain 283 as text date, outside ordinary milestone inference.","raw_catalogue":{"publication":"CIL 02-14, 00318 = CIL 02, 03835 (p XLVII, XLVIII, LXXX) = CIL 02-14, p 1024 = CIL 17-01, *00005 = ELST 00023 = IRSAT 00032 = MiliariTarrac 00136 = AE 2014, +00554","province":"Hispania citerior","place":"Sagunt / Sagunto / Saguntum","coordinates":[-0.2774146,39.6791712],"start":283,"end":283,"rawDating":"283 to 283","text":"Imp(eratori) M(arco) Aur(elio) Carino / nobilissimo / Caes(ari) Pio Felici / Invicto Aug(usto) / pont(ifici) maximo / trib(unicia) pot(estate) p(atri) p(atriae) co(n)s(uli) / proco(n)s(uli)"}}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-08701359":{"level":"excluded","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-cil-identity-v8-EDCS-08701359","level":"excluded","status":"roadwork-inscription-not-milestone","label":"La Carlota: public roadwork pillar","reason":"CIL II²/5,1280 classifies this as titulus operis publici on a rectangular worked pillar with support fittings and a text over an earlier inscription. It records Via Augusta and bridge repair, without mileage. Melchor places it on a bridge over Arroyo Guadalmazán. Preserve as roadwork evidence, outside ordinary milestone counts.","decision":"CIL II²/5,1280 classifies this as titulus operis publici on a rectangular worked pillar with support fittings and a text over an earlier inscription. It records Via Augusta and bridge repair, without mileage. Melchor places it on a bridge over Arroyo Guadalmazán. Preserve as roadwork evidence, outside ordinary milestone counts.","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"sources":[{"id":"carlota","title":"A. U. Stylow et al., CIL II²/5 (1998), p. 362, no. 1280","url":"https://cil.bbaw.de/ace/","locator":"p. 362, no. 1280, local ","consultation":"Exact modern CIL page rendered and visually read; no redistribution of modern scan.","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."},{"id":"melchor","title":"E. Melchor Gil, El Baetis y la organización viaria del sur peninsular, Anas 21–22 (2008/2009), pp. 163–191","url":"https://adesalambrar.com/documentacion/El_Baetis_y_la_organizacion_viaria_del.pdf","locator":"p. 166 and note 11; p. 188 fig. 8; downloaded ","consultation":"Full scholarly PDF fetched and read; fig. 8 visually inspected. Mirror PDF not redistributed.","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."}],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-17","limits":"No object autopsy; claims limited to exact cited evidence.","locator":"CIL p. 362 no. 1280; Melchor p. 166 n.11 and p.188 fig.8","chronology_note":"CIL dates the text to 79, probably January–March. Earlier imperial attribution beneath the text remains hypothetical.","location_note":"CIL corrects La Carolina to La Carlota; discovered in Arroyo Guadalmazán in 1788. Repository Sevilla M.A.P., REP.239. Current locality coordinate is no precise bridge fix.","raw_catalogue":{"publication":"CIL 02-05, 01280 = CIL 02, 04697 = CIL 17-01, *00012 = D 05867 = CILA-03-02, 00619 = MiliariTarrac 00275 = AE 2009, +00092 = CMB-OI, 00006 = Sillieres-1990, 00108 = Schmidt-2021, 00045","province":"Baetica","place":"La Carlota / Astigi","coordinates":[-4.9325335,37.6746159],"start":79,"end":79,"rawDating":"79 to 79","text":"Imp(erator) Caesar Vespas/ianus Aug(ustus) pontif(ex) / max(imus) trib(unicia) pot(estate) X imp(erator) / XX co(n)s(ul) IX p(ater) p(atriae) censor / viam Aug(ustam) ab Iano / ad Oceanum refe/cit pontes fecit / veteres restituit"}}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-05501843":{"level":"excluded","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-cil-identity-v8-EDCS-05501843","level":"excluded","status":"honorific-column-with-copy-history","label":"Chaves: Padrão dos Povos and its copies","reason":"Silva publishes the original cylindrical dedication recovered from the Tâmega in 1980 and demonstrates differences from the previously known copy. The civitates dedicate the monument to imperial/provincial authorities; there is no mileage sequence. Treat it as commemorative or honorific context at the bridge, not an independently verified milestone. A copy is not proof of forgery. CIL calls the support a basis and explicitly warns that proximity to the bridge does not prove the ten civitates built or dedicated that bridge; Huebner also rejects a strictly dedicatory reading, unlike Silva. Preserve this interpretive disagreement and do not equate 79 with bridge construction.","decision":"Silva publishes the original cylindrical dedication recovered from the Tâmega in 1980 and demonstrates differences from the previously known copy. The civitates dedicate the monument to imperial/provincial authorities; there is no mileage sequence. Treat it as commemorative or honorific context at the bridge, not an independently verified milestone. A copy is not proof of forgery. CIL calls the support a basis and explicitly warns that proximity to the bridge does not prove the ten civitates built or dedicated that bridge; Huebner also rejects a strictly dedicatory reading, unlike Silva. Preserve this interpretive disagreement and do not equate 79 with bridge construction.","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"sources":[{"id":"silva","title":"A. Coelho F. da Silva, Novos dados sobre a organização social castreja, Portugalia 2/3 (1981/82), pp. 83–94","url":"https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/Port/article/download/5014/4683/15715","locator":"Documentation no. 2, pp. 90–92; est. IV figs. 3–4","consultation":"Full publisher PDF fetched and extracted; complete no. 2 read. [workstation path omitted]"},{"title":"E. Huebner, CIL II (1869), p. 346, no. 2477","url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2027/umn.31951001453302","locator":"p. 346, no. 2477, local ; commentary v.1-6","image":"research/catalogue-audit-v8-evidence/cil-ii-1869-p346.png","consultation":"Exact local p.346 extracted, rendered and visually read 2026-10-17.","id":"chaves-cil","page_image":"evidence/cil-ii-1869-p346.png","image_sha256":"67d35a8417afb2732830bbc8f81648953bb27e212140d9ba71574095aa6db490","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."}],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-17","limits":"Commemorative or honorific function is an interpretive classification; exact purpose remains disputed. The corpus and original recovery publication do not establish a primary mileage-marker setting.","locator":"Silva Documentation no.2 pp.90-92; CIL II p.346 no.2477 commentary v.1-6","chronology_note":"79 dates the original text. Silva dates it before 23 June. EDH’s narrower January–February proposal depends on restored consulship. Neither dates a later copy.","location_note":"Found 27 August 1980 during dredging, riverbed upstream near bridge and left bank; repository reported as Museu da Região Flaviense. No primary road emplacement established.","raw_catalogue":{"publication":"CIL 02, 02477 (p 706) = CIL 02, 05616 = D 00254 = EE-08-02, p 406 = AE 1952, +00122 = AE 1983, 00586 = AE 1994, 00939 = AquaeFlaviae-1997, 00587","province":"Hispania citerior","place":"Chaves / Aquae Flaviae","coordinates":[-7.471477,41.7399453],"start":79,"end":79,"rawDating":"79 to 79","text":"Imp(eratori) Caes(ari) Ve[sp(asiano) Aug(usto) pont(ifici)] / max(imo) trib(unicia) pot(estate) [X imp(eratori) XX p(atri) p(atriae) co(n)s(uli) IX] / Imp(eratori) Vesp(asiano) Caes(ari) Au[g(usti) f(ilio) pont(ifici) trib(unicia) pot(estate)] / VIII imp(eratori) XIIII co(n)[s(uli) VII(?)] / [[6]] / G(aio!) Calpetano Ra[ntio Quirinali] / Val(erio) Festo leg(ato) A[ug(usti) pr(o) pr(aetore)] / D(ecimo) Cornelio Ma[eciano leg(ato) Aug(usti)] / L(ucio) Arruntio Max[imo proc(uratori) Aug(usti)] / leg(ionis) VII Gem(inae) [Fel(icis)] / civitates [X] / Aquiflavien[ses 3] / Bibali Coel[erni 3] / Interamic[i 3]/ Quarque[r]ni Ta[magani]"}}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-05401255":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-cil-identity-v8-EDCS-05401255","level":"caution","status":"contested-authenticity","label":"Cesiomaggiore: authenticity unresolved","reason":"Basso proposes an eighteenth-century imitation of Rabland, citing shape, lettering and different stone, but explicitly says this remains difficult to demonstrate. Propagate the already curated X-comparator warning to the bulk row. Do not adopt a proven falsum verdict.","decision":"Basso proposes an eighteenth-century imitation of Rabland, citing shape, lettering and different stone, but explicitly says this remains difficult to demonstrate. Propagate the already curated X-comparator warning to the bulk row. Do not adopt a proven falsum verdict.","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"sources":[{"id":"basso","title":"P. Basso, Excavations in the North of Italy along the via Claudia Augusta, in A. Kolb (ed.), Roman Roads (2019), pp. 404–422","url":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110638332-020","locator":"p. 417, final two paragraphs and note 18; p. 406 and note 3","sha256":"37882dea2b925e648308dcae5e82833f5e831e3cb9120aeed176b72f38689267","consultation":"Exact local p. 417 and p. 406 extracted and read afresh."}],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-17","limits":"No object autopsy; claims limited to exact cited evidence.","locator":"p.417 last two paragraphs/n.18; p.406/n.3","force_chronology_uncertainty":true,"chronology_note":"Legacy46CE is a claimed ancient text date conditional on authenticity. Basso summarizes45–46; other dossier sources differ. No exact manufacture year established.","curated_case_id":"cil-v-8002-cesiomaggiore","raw_catalogue":{"publication":"CIL 05, 08002 = D 00208 = IBR 00469 = MiliariVenetia 00036","province":"Venetia et Histria / Regio X","place":"Cesiomaggiore","coordinates":[11.9876388,46.0888165],"start":46,"end":46,"rawDating":"46 to 46","text":"Ti(berius) Claudius Drusi f(ilius) / Caesar Aug(ustus) Germa/nicus pontifex max<i=U>/mus tribunicia potesta/te VI co(n)s(ul) IV imp(erator) XI p(ater) p(atriae) / censor viam Claudiam / Augustam quam Drusus / pater Alpibus bello pate/factis derex[e]rat munit ab / Altino usque ad flumen / Danuvium m(ilia) p(assuum) CCCL"},"chronology_policy":"Retain raw numerical date components and identify them as claimed/transmitted, conditional on authenticity or reliability. Withhold affirmative road-construction/date-comparison inference; do not silently convert raw ancient dates into an assertion that the text is wholly undated.","withhold_comparison":true,"chronology":{"policy":"conditional-transmission","phases":[{"id":"catalogue-date-component-1","sourceLabel":null,"raw":"46 to 46","start":46,"end":46,"dateStatus":"conditional","datingBasis":"Source catalogue metadata; not independently redated","source_ids":["basso"],"label":"Conditional transmitted date; text/authenticity under review","dateIssue":"Legacy46CE is a claimed ancient text date conditional on authenticity. Basso summarizes45–46; other dossier sources differ. No exact manufacture year established."}],"reason":"Retain raw numerical date components and identify them as claimed/transmitted, conditional on authenticity or reliability. Withhold affirmative road-construction/date-comparison inference; do not silently convert raw ancient dates into an assertion that the text is wholly undated.","source_ids":["basso"]}}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-27000346":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-cil-identity-v8-EDCS-27000346","level":"caution","status":"interpolated-manuscript-transmission","label":"Troas CIL III 467: interpolated copies","reason":"CIL explicitly describes the transmitted Caracalla and Diocletian texts as interpolated, while allowing ancient underlying texts. Thevet increases the interpolation. Keep raw dating217 and283–305, but make its dependence on interpolated transmission explicit; do not call the entire underlying stone a proven modern forgery.","decision":"CIL explicitly describes the transmitted Caracalla and Diocletian texts as interpolated, while allowing ancient underlying texts. Thevet increases the interpolation. Keep raw dating217 and283–305, but make its dependence on interpolated transmission explicit; do not call the entire underlying stone a proven modern forgery.","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"sources":[{"id":"cilIII","title":"T. Mommsen, CIL III (1873), p. 87, no. 467","url":"https://cil.bbaw.de/ace/","locator":"p. 87, no. 467, local ","image":"research/catalogue-audit-v8-evidence/cil-iii-1873-p87.png","consultation":"Exact local page extracted, rendered and visually read. URL is official project portal; claim rests on local edition, not portal text.","page_image":"evidence/cil-iii-1873-p87.png","image_sha256":"55ccbc49dbca4a626c31f829eb01e6fa4869fc0ec8be541fe64099841f52ae83","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."}],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-17","limits":"No object autopsy; claims limited to exact cited evidence.","locator":"p.87 no.467 source list and final commentary","force_chronology_uncertainty":true,"chronology_note":"Raw date components are conditional; transmitted offices cannot securely date a construction act.","raw_catalogue":{"publication":"CIL 03, 00467 = IK-53, 00056 = RRMAM-02-01, 00316 = RRMAM-03-05, 00128","province":"Asia","place":"Dalyan / Alexandreia Troas","coordinates":[26.144506,39.759827],"start":217,"end":305,"rawDating":"a:  217 to 217;   b:  283 to 305","text":"Imperator Caesar / Mar(cus) Aur(elius) Antoninus / Pius Felix Part(h)icus / maximus Germanicus maximus / trib(unicia) pot(estate) I(!) imp(erator) XV(!) co(n)s(ul) III(!) / provinciam Asiam / per viam et flumina / pontibus subiugavit // Imp(eratore) Caesar(e) Aug(usto) / Diocletiano regnante"},"chronology_policy":"Retain raw numerical date components and identify them as claimed/transmitted, conditional on authenticity or reliability. Withhold affirmative road-construction/date-comparison inference; do not silently convert raw ancient dates into an assertion that the text is wholly undated.","withhold_comparison":true,"chronology":{"policy":"conditional-transmission","phases":[{"id":"catalogue-date-component-1","sourceLabel":"a","raw":"a:  217 to 217","start":217,"end":217,"dateStatus":"conditional","datingBasis":"Source catalogue metadata; not independently redated","source_ids":["cilIII"],"label":"Conditional transmitted date; text/authenticity under review","dateIssue":"Raw date components are conditional; transmitted offices cannot securely date a construction act."},{"id":"catalogue-date-component-2","sourceLabel":"b","raw":"   b:  283 to 305","start":283,"end":305,"dateStatus":"conditional","datingBasis":"Source catalogue metadata; not independently redated","source_ids":["cilIII"],"label":"Conditional transmitted date; text/authenticity under review","dateIssue":"Raw date components are conditional; transmitted offices cannot securely date a construction act."}],"reason":"Retain raw numerical date components and identify them as claimed/transmitted, conditional on authenticity or reliability. Withhold affirmative road-construction/date-comparison inference; do not silently convert raw ancient dates into an assertion that the text is wholly undated.","source_ids":["cilIII"]}}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-29900459":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-cil-identity-v8-EDCS-29900459","level":"caution","status":"uncertain-milestone-identification","label":"Castiliscar: identification unresolved","reason":"Retained HD041736 calls this architectural member? and asks Meilenstein?; Lostal1992 pp.217–218 no.262 and CILXVII/1 *16 originals were not inspected. Keep a visible open identification and review queue, not a forgery or definitive non-milestone verdict.","decision":"Retained HD041736 calls this architectural member? and asks Meilenstein?; Lostal1992 pp.217–218 no.262 and CILXVII/1 *16 originals were not inspected. Keep a visible open identification and review queue, not a forgery or definitive non-milestone verdict.","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"sources":[{"id":"edh","title":"Retained EDH enrichment in atlas catalogue snapshot","url":"https://edh.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/","locator":"HD041736 and HD082444 fields in site/dist/data/milestones.json","consultation":"Local retained records inspected. Original Lostal 1992 and Faure-Brac 2002 publications not inspected."}],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-17","limits":"Original publication unavailable in this bounded review; no exclusion solely from asterisk or question mark.","locator":"HD041736 type/commentary/literature","force_chronology_uncertainty":false,"chronology_note":"201-400 is broad inherited metadata, not an independently verified milestone date. Preserve its text-date filtering value; uncertainty in identification alone does not make a separate text date unknown.","raw_catalogue":{"publication":"CIL 17-01, *00016 = MiliariTarrac 00262","province":"Hispania citerior","place":"Castiliscar","coordinates":[-1.2736403,42.3763826],"start":201,"end":400,"rawDating":"201 to 400","text":"] / ES[3] / IEOA / MAE / TE"}}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-12400325":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-cil-identity-v8-EDCS-12400325","level":"caution","status":"enrichment-identity-conflict","label":"Beek: incompatible partner enrichment","reason":"The Beek/Germania inferior EDCS record cites CILXIII9162 and XVII/2 584. HD082444 instead describes a tile from a Gallo-Roman villa at Chassey-lès-Montbozon, CAG70 p.178. The identities are incompatible. Preserve both raw records, flag and withhold the enrichment; do not reclassify the Beek milestone as a tile.","decision":"The Beek/Germania inferior EDCS record cites CILXIII9162 and XVII/2 584. HD082444 instead describes a tile from a Gallo-Roman villa at Chassey-lès-Montbozon, CAG70 p.178. The identities are incompatible. Preserve both raw records, flag and withhold the enrichment; do not reclassify the Beek milestone as a tile.","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"sources":[{"id":"edh","title":"Retained EDH enrichment in atlas catalogue snapshot","url":"https://edh.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/","locator":"HD041736 and HD082444 fields in site/dist/data/milestones.json","consultation":"Local retained records inspected. Original Lostal 1992 and Faure-Brac 2002 publications not inspected."}],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-17","limits":"No object autopsy; claims limited to exact cited evidence.","locator":"EDCS12400325 versus attachedHD082444 place/type/literature","enrichment_identity_conflict":true,"display_policy":"Keep EDCS identity pending CIL review; withhold incompatible EDH object/findspot/repository assertions.","raw_catalogue":{"publication":"CIL 17-02, 00584 = CIL 13, 09162","province":"Germania inferior","place":"Beek","coordinates":[6.4714243,51.6591304],"start":98,"end":102,"rawDating":"98 to 102","text":"Imp(erator) Cae(sar) Ne[r]/va Traian[us] / Aug(ustus) Ger(manicus) po[nt(ifex)] / max(imus) trib(unicia) [pot(estate) 3] / p(ater) p(atriae) co(n)s(ul) ["},"withhold_edh_enrichment":true}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":true},"EDCS-12400270":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"id":"catalogue-cil-identity-v8-EDCS-12400270","level":"caution","status":"reviewed-date-conflict","label":"Sacquenay: 43 raw versus published January44","reason":"Reddé accepts this as a Claudian milestone, dates it explicitly to January44CE, and argues for Langres–Vaux-sous-Aubigny–Mirebeau–Pontailler rather than Walser’s Langres–Dijon association. A legacy CILIII starred concordance does not override that accepted identification. Retain raw43 beside published44.","decision":"Reddé accepts this as a Claudian milestone, dates it explicitly to January44CE, and argues for Langres–Vaux-sous-Aubigny–Mirebeau–Pontailler rather than Walser’s Langres–Dijon association. A legacy CILIII starred concordance does not override that accepted identification. Retain raw43 beside published44.","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"sources":[{"id":"redde","title":"M. Reddé, Autour de Mirebeau, in M. Cavalieri (ed.), Industria Apium. Hommages à R. Brulet (2012), pp. 269–282, publisher digital reprint","url":"https://una-editions.fr/23-autour-de-mirebeau/","locator":"Paragraph beginning J’avais alors fait remarquer, immediately before notes 20–22; note 20","consultation":"Full publisher HTML opened, relevant paragraph and notes read. Explicit dating January 44 CE.","excerpt":"le milliaire de Sacquenay (CIL XIII, 9044), l’un des plus anciens de Gaule puisqu’il est daté de janvier 44"}],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-17","limits":"No object autopsy; claims limited to exact cited evidence.","locator":"Paragraph before nn.20–22 and n.20","location_note":"Published route argument; no new precise original coordinate asserted.","raw_catalogue":{"publication":"CIL 17-02, 00530 = CIL 13, 09044 (p 4, 146) = CIL 03, *00235 (p 37*) = ILTG 00489 = ILingons-B, 00005 = D 08900 = CAG-21-03, p 109","province":"Belgica","place":"Sacquenay","coordinates":[5.3217892,47.5919626],"start":43,"end":43,"rawDating":"43 to 43","text":"Ti(berius) Claud(ius) Drusi f(ilius) / Caesar Aug(ustus) Ger/manic(us) pont(ifex) max(imus) / trib(unicia) potest(ate) III imp(erator) / III p(ater) p(atriae) co(n)s(ul) III de/signat(us) IIII / And(emantunno) m(ilia) p(assuum) XXII"},"chronology":{"policy":"publication-components","reason":"Publication explicitly dates January44, conflicting with raw43; preserve and display both.","phases":[{"id":"reviewed-redde-2012-sacquenay","start":44,"end":44,"dateStatus":"bounded","datingBasis":"Reddé2012, paragraph before note20: explicit January44CE; year bounds preserve published dating, not day precision.","source_id":"redde"}]}}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901037":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901037","identifiers":["RIB-01, 02228"],"level":"caution","subtype":"published-undated-vs-numeric-catalogue","decision":"withhold-catalogue-range-from-positive-date-matches","reason":"The edition gives no inscription date. The addendum excludes an attribution to Septimius Severus; it supplies no replacement year.","raw_snapshot":{"start":101,"end":230,"rawDating":"101 to 230","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"101","dating_to":"230","date_not_before":"101","date_not_after":"230"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2228-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2228. Fragmentary milestone","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2228","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"c52f9b0b6e686ea44507fe9044a487b2dde70a82c07cf68e03515811b031be4f"}],"chronology":{"policy":"uncertainty-only","phases":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"RIB 2228: ancient inscription undated","basis":"The edition gives no inscription date. The addendum excludes an attribution to Septimius Severus; it supplies no replacement year.","source_ids":["rib-2228-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"undated"}],"reason":"The edition gives no inscription date. The addendum excludes an attribution to Septimius Severus; it supplies no replacement year.","source_ids":["rib-2228-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901037"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901052":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901052","identifiers":["CIL 07, 01168 = RIB-01, 02243 = AE 1953, 00139"],"level":"caution","subtype":"published-undated-vs-numeric-catalogue","decision":"withhold-catalogue-range-from-positive-date-matches","reason":"The emperor name and tribunician numeral are lost; RIB supplies no inscription date.","raw_snapshot":{"start":71,"end":330,"rawDating":"71 to 330","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"71","dating_to":"330","date_not_before":"71","date_not_after":"330"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2243-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2243. Fragmentary milestone","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2243","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"ce267bae86228f8851561ce3a939e2aff2bfb17320ba06098e09f5d32023de23"}],"chronology":{"policy":"uncertainty-only","phases":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"RIB 2243: ancient inscription undated","basis":"The emperor name and tribunician numeral are lost; RIB supplies no inscription date.","source_ids":["rib-2243-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"undated"}],"reason":"The emperor name and tribunician numeral are lost; RIB supplies no inscription date.","source_ids":["rib-2243-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901052"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901054":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901054","identifiers":["RIB-01, 02245"],"level":"caution","subtype":"published-undated-vs-numeric-catalogue","decision":"withhold-catalogue-range-from-positive-date-matches","reason":"The edition supplies no inscription date; the second line and subsequent lettering are largely chiselled away.","raw_snapshot":{"start":43,"end":300,"rawDating":"43 to 300","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"43","dating_to":"300","date_not_before":"43","date_not_after":"300"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2245-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2245. Fragmentary milestone","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2245","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"fbd183b2d3c1cdacb3a82ba09c4114cf3b248b5685158b61cda7a650617f3fac"}],"chronology":{"policy":"uncertainty-only","phases":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"RIB 2245: ancient inscription undated","basis":"The edition supplies no inscription date; the second line and subsequent lettering are largely chiselled away.","source_ids":["rib-2245-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"undated"}],"reason":"The edition supplies no inscription date; the second line and subsequent lettering are largely chiselled away.","source_ids":["rib-2245-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901054"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901056":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901056","identifiers":["RIB-01, 02247"],"level":"caution","subtype":"published-undated-vs-numeric-catalogue","decision":"withhold-catalogue-range-from-positive-date-matches","reason":"The edition supplies no inscription date; IMP CAE does not identify an emperor or year.","raw_snapshot":{"start":51,"end":350,"rawDating":"51 to 350","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"51","dating_to":"350","date_not_before":"51","date_not_after":"350"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2247-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2247. Fragmentary milestone","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2247","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"b253204e59c2a2acc383f0ff4907406a8a6e1d911c77c2a70e5025ffed78da54"}],"chronology":{"policy":"uncertainty-only","phases":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"RIB 2247: ancient inscription undated","basis":"The edition supplies no inscription date; IMP CAE does not identify an emperor or year.","source_ids":["rib-2247-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"undated"}],"reason":"The edition supplies no inscription date; IMP CAE does not identify an emperor or year.","source_ids":["rib-2247-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901056"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901057":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901057","identifiers":["RIB-01, 02248"],"level":"caution","subtype":"published-undated-vs-numeric-catalogue","decision":"withhold-catalogue-range-from-positive-date-matches","reason":"The edition supplies no inscription date; the surviving mileage formula is not a chronological numeral.","raw_snapshot":{"start":51,"end":350,"rawDating":"51 to 350","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"51","dating_to":"350","date_not_before":"51","date_not_after":"350"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2248-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2248. Fragmentary milestone","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2248","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"ebd0466ab6fa894d7f0fd1a989053d85404bed94a4997eb0ef86e384c6f454f0"}],"chronology":{"policy":"uncertainty-only","phases":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"RIB 2248: ancient inscription undated","basis":"The edition supplies no inscription date; the surviving mileage formula is not a chronological numeral.","source_ids":["rib-2248-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"undated"}],"reason":"The edition supplies no inscription date; the surviving mileage formula is not a chronological numeral.","source_ids":["rib-2248-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901057"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901088":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901088","identifiers":["RIB-01, 02283 = AE 2017, 00860h = Britannia-2017-490"],"level":"caution","subtype":"published-undated-vs-numeric-catalogue","decision":"withhold-catalogue-range-from-positive-date-matches","reason":"The edition supplies no ancient inscription date. The 1836 Latin text records modern re-erection and must remain a separate event.","raw_snapshot":{"start":101,"end":300,"rawDating":"101 to 300","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"101","dating_to":"300","date_not_before":"101","date_not_after":"300"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2283-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2283. Milestone","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2283","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"c07a5e73618fc50206a4b421f29e83e791be5e3560158311ada4b4d755108070"}],"chronology":{"policy":"uncertainty-only","phases":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"RIB 2283: ancient inscription undated","basis":"The edition supplies no ancient inscription date. The 1836 Latin text records modern re-erection and must remain a separate event.","source_ids":["rib-2283-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"undated"}],"reason":"The edition supplies no ancient inscription date. The 1836 Latin text records modern re-erection and must remain a separate event.","source_ids":["rib-2283-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901088"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901107":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901107","identifiers":["RIB-01, 02304"],"level":"caution","subtype":"published-undated-vs-numeric-catalogue","decision":"withhold-catalogue-range-from-positive-date-matches","reason":"The edition supplies no inscription date for this fragment.","raw_snapshot":{"start":101,"end":350,"rawDating":"101 to 350","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"101","dating_to":"350","date_not_before":"101","date_not_after":"350"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2304-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2304. Fragmentary milestone","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2304","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"54f4b65eb75419f5d206084cca55748198b9c856e3e10297be6e6ff7cd9f4706"}],"chronology":{"policy":"uncertainty-only","phases":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"RIB 2304: ancient inscription undated","basis":"The edition supplies no inscription date for this fragment.","source_ids":["rib-2304-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"undated"}],"reason":"The edition supplies no inscription date for this fragment.","source_ids":["rib-2304-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901107"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-44600270":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-44600270","identifiers":["RIB-03, 03527"],"level":"caution","subtype":"published-undated-vs-numeric-catalogue","decision":"withhold-catalogue-range-from-positive-date-matches","reason":"The edition supplies no inscription date. The fragments had been published twice; secondary incisions do not belong to the milestone text.","raw_snapshot":{"start":122,"end":300,"rawDating":"122 to 300","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"122","dating_to":"300","date_not_before":"122","date_not_after":"300"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-3527-dating-v8","title":"RIB 3527. Fragmentary milestone","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/3527","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"06cb38dada2833e1411843cf5a5ab4c7c40809d6959e22969276eb653c164449"}],"chronology":{"policy":"uncertainty-only","phases":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"RIB 3527: ancient inscription undated","basis":"The edition supplies no inscription date. The fragments had been published twice; secondary incisions do not belong to the milestone text.","source_ids":["rib-3527-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"undated"}],"reason":"The edition supplies no inscription date. The fragments had been published twice; secondary incisions do not belong to the milestone text.","source_ids":["rib-3527-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-44600270"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901033":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901033","identifiers":["CIL 07, 01150a = RIB-01, 02224"],"level":"caution","subtype":"multiple-phases-and-internal-source-conflict","decision":"use-separate-RIB-commentary-phases-with-visible-Date-field-conflict","reason":"The catalogue envelope 238–270 fills the gap between two inscriptions and truncates the secondary phase. RIB Commentary dates the primary to 238–244 and the secondary to 270–273. Its separate Date field instead prints 234–44 for the primary; that disagreement is retained, not silently corrected.","raw_snapshot":{"start":238,"end":270,"rawDating":"238 to 270","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"238","dating_to":"270","date_not_before":"238","date_not_after":"270"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2224-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2224. Milestone of Gordian III and Tetricus","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2224","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"6e2f1516d8ba43d7b16809e05ef17694e41c8b6e3be99cdf613f0aeef5982443"}],"chronology":{"policy":"publication-components","phases":[{"start":238,"end":244,"label":"Primary text: Gordian III (RIB Commentary)","basis":"RIB Commentary explicitly gives 238–244; the Date field differs at the lower bound.","source_ids":["rib-2224-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"bounded","qualification":"Internal source disagreement: Date field 234–244; Commentary 238–244."},{"start":270,"end":273,"label":"Secondary text: Tetricus","basis":"RIB Date and Commentary both give 270–273.","source_ids":["rib-2224-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"bounded"}],"reason":"The catalogue envelope 238–270 fills the gap between two inscriptions and truncates the secondary phase. RIB Commentary dates the primary to 238–244 and the secondary to 270–273. Its separate Date field instead prints 234–44 for the primary; that disagreement is retained, not silently corrected.","source_ids":["rib-2224-dating-v8"]},"reported_alternatives":[{"start":234,"end":244,"label":"RIB Date field: primary","status":"Internal RIB metadata disagreement; not silently declared a typo","source_ids":["rib-2224-dating-v8"]}],"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901033"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901045":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901045","identifiers":["CIL 07, 01155 = RIB-01, 02236"],"level":"caution","subtype":"published-range-outside-catalogue","decision":"use-RIB-published-object-range","reason":"RIB gives 305–353, attributed to titulature and MusArchAnth, whereas the snapshot has 43–300. This is a published object-level range; the page distinguishes primary and secondary lettering without separately dating each.","raw_snapshot":{"start":43,"end":300,"rawDating":"43 to 300","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"43","dating_to":"300","date_not_before":"43","date_not_after":"300"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2236-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2236. Fragmentary milestone","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2236","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"b5830d00b8927fd899e8a2992d2e1f448a8f145e086a78bb00ff031e6c308750"}],"chronology":{"policy":"publication-components","phases":[{"start":305,"end":353,"label":"RIB 2236 published object-level date","basis":"RIB Text Date; criterion titulature; dating source MusArchAnth. Does not separately assign dates to both texts.","source_ids":["rib-2236-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"bounded"}],"reason":"RIB gives 305–353, attributed to titulature and MusArchAnth, whereas the snapshot has 43–300. This is a published object-level range; the page distinguishes primary and secondary lettering without separately dating each.","source_ids":["rib-2236-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901045"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901095":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901095","identifiers":["RIB-01, 02290 = RIB-01, 02291 = RIB-01, 02292 = D 08928 = AE 1895, 00001 = AE 1895, 00113 = BritRom-14, 00003 = BritRom-14, 00009"],"level":"caution","subtype":"erased-primary-vs-invented-numeric-span","decision":"use-undated-primary-and-two-dated-reinscriptions","reason":"RIB 2290 gives no date for the erased primary text. RIB 2291 and 2292 date the later texts to 286–293 and 306–307. The catalogue component 251–350 must not turn the erased text into a dated match or connect the later phases.","raw_snapshot":{"start":251,"end":350,"rawDating":"a:  251 to 350;   b:  286 to 293;   c:  306 to 307","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"251","dating_to":"350","date_not_before":"251","date_not_after":"350"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2290-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2290. Fragmentary milestone","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2290","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"10f8f357e562a8966c3582f3fd038a65c79abdcf5c49c657c6111081dcfadf58"},{"id":"rib-2291-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2291. Milestone of Carausius","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2291","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"3f5c3e2c33db46621e5ab666ec90dc078b23304f42ba923c19a72af9ee4eb435"},{"id":"rib-2292-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2292. Milestone of Constantine I","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2292","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"0823c4e71258b991d71c00aa0baea55a3e81e661425e5d15f70953629f67482f"}],"chronology":{"policy":"publication-components","phases":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"Erased primary text (RIB 2290)","basis":"RIB 2290 Text Date gives no indication.","source_ids":["rib-2290-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"undated"},{"start":286,"end":293,"label":"Carausius text (RIB 2291)","basis":"RIB Text Date and Commentary, published reign range.","source_ids":["rib-2291-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"bounded"},{"start":306,"end":307,"label":"Constantine as Caesar (RIB 2292)","basis":"RIB Text Date and Commentary, titulature.","source_ids":["rib-2292-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"bounded"}],"reason":"RIB 2290 gives no date for the erased primary text. RIB 2291 and 2292 date the later texts to 286–293 and 306–307. The catalogue component 251–350 must not turn the erased text into a dated match or connect the later phases.","source_ids":["rib-2290-dating-v8","rib-2291-dating-v8","rib-2292-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901095"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901111":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901111","identifiers":["CIL 07, 01187 = RIB-01, 02308"],"level":"caution","subtype":"primary-date-unestablished-secondary-fourth-century","decision":"separate-undated-primary-from-fourth-century-reinscription","reason":"RIB dates the secondary formula to the fourth century. The primary fragment DRI has only tentative old identifications and no independently established date. The raw 101–400 envelope must not assert a dated second-century phase.","raw_snapshot":{"start":101,"end":400,"rawDating":"101 to 400","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"101","dating_to":"400","date_not_before":"101","date_not_after":"400"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2308-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2308. Fragmentary milestone","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2308","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"9c2142bc2010f4f5d49e743612542ebb83bb181f2093aca8781dcbffe57fa04d"}],"chronology":{"policy":"publication-components","phases":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"Primary DRI fragment: date unestablished","basis":"Edition and Apparatus distinguish a prior fragmentary text; proposed imperial identification is conjectural.","source_ids":["rib-2308-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"undated"},{"start":301,"end":400,"label":"Secondary formula: fourth century","basis":"RIB Text Date: fourth-century; textual-context criterion. 301–400 is the atlas year-granularity rendering of that century.","source_ids":["rib-2308-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"bounded","qualification":"Century-level attribution; not a precise year."}],"reason":"RIB dates the secondary formula to the fourth century. The primary fragment DRI has only tentative old identifications and no independently established date. The raw 101–400 envelope must not assert a dated second-century phase.","source_ids":["rib-2308-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901111"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-44600267":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-44600267","identifiers":["RIB-03, 03518"],"level":"caution","subtype":"publication-refines-or-conflicts-with-catalogue","decision":"use-qualified-RIB-publication-range","reason":"RIB Text Date and Commentary give 270–273. Catalogue 271–274 differs at both boundaries.","raw_snapshot":{"start":271,"end":274,"rawDating":"271 to 274","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"271","dating_to":"274","date_not_before":"271","date_not_after":"274"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-3518-dating-v8","title":"RIB 3518. Milestone of Tetricus","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/3518","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"c77726ebc686aea67b1ae037f168622cd7db6a972f547310de3467317ea9bcea"}],"chronology":{"policy":"publication-components","phases":[{"start":270,"end":273,"label":"RIB 3518: published dating","basis":"RIB Text Date and Commentary give 270–273. Catalogue 271–274 differs at both boundaries.","source_ids":["rib-3518-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"bounded","qualification":"Published RIB reign range; not an independently inscribed precise date."}],"reason":"RIB Text Date and Commentary give 270–273. Catalogue 271–274 differs at both boundaries.","source_ids":["rib-3518-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-44600267"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-10701781":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-10701781","identifiers":["RIB-03, 03520 = AE 1966, 00225"],"level":"caution","subtype":"publication-refines-or-conflicts-with-catalogue","decision":"use-qualified-RIB-publication-range","reason":"RIB Text Date gives 307–317, supported by its discussion of the name Valerius and titulature; the catalogue retains the broader 307–337 reign envelope.","raw_snapshot":{"start":307,"end":337,"rawDating":"307 to 337","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"307","dating_to":"337","date_not_before":"307","date_not_after":"337"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-3520-dating-v8","title":"RIB 3520. Milestone of Constantine","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/3520","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"d3853b6bb7770f5d23d6662f4e61d30fd9de16ee79c97249825a344686b4fdb7"}],"chronology":{"policy":"publication-components","phases":[{"start":307,"end":317,"label":"RIB 3520: published dating","basis":"RIB Text Date gives 307–317, supported by its discussion of the name Valerius and titulature; the catalogue retains the broader 307–337 reign envelope.","source_ids":["rib-3520-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"bounded","qualification":"Published qualified titulature argument; 317 is a scholarly boundary."}],"reason":"RIB Text Date gives 307–317, supported by its discussion of the name Valerius and titulature; the catalogue retains the broader 307–337 reign envelope.","source_ids":["rib-3520-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-10701781"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-12800320":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-12800320","identifiers":["RIB-03, 03521 = AE 1964, 00176 = BritRom-14, 00012"],"level":"caution","subtype":"publication-refines-or-conflicts-with-catalogue","decision":"use-qualified-RIB-publication-range","reason":"RIB Text Date explicitly says circa 307–317 and refers to the RIB 3520 argument; the catalogue retains 307–337.","raw_snapshot":{"start":307,"end":337,"rawDating":"307 to 337","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"307","dating_to":"337","date_not_before":"307","date_not_after":"337"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-3521-dating-v8","title":"RIB 3521. Milestone of Constantine","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/3521","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"b0e015efad82bf747b14232158c8a201193f687081b0f27dc5ec3daa779eeeef"}],"chronology":{"policy":"publication-components","phases":[{"start":307,"end":317,"label":"RIB 3521: published dating","basis":"RIB Text Date explicitly says circa 307–317 and refers to the RIB 3520 argument; the catalogue retains 307–337.","source_ids":["rib-3521-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"bounded","qualification":"Circa 307–317; approximate boundaries retained visibly."}],"reason":"RIB Text Date explicitly says circa 307–317 and refers to the RIB 3520 argument; the catalogue retains 307–337.","source_ids":["rib-3521-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-12800320"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-44600163":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-44600163","identifiers":["RIB-03, 03522 = AE 1958, 00106"],"level":"caution","subtype":"publication-refines-or-conflicts-with-catalogue","decision":"use-qualified-RIB-publication-range","reason":"RIB Text Date gives March–9 December 222; its Commentary treats accession-year attribution as probable because no tribunician numeral could fit. The catalogue 231–235 is incompatible.","raw_snapshot":{"start":231,"end":235,"rawDating":"231 to 235","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"231","dating_to":"235","date_not_before":"231","date_not_after":"235"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-3522-dating-v8","title":"RIB 3522. Milestone of Severus Alexander","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/3522","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"037106a3b59a2d7a727278e99710ae9337236156d8ae35a36f4fe2b82c422064"}],"chronology":{"policy":"publication-components","phases":[{"start":222,"end":222,"label":"RIB 3522: published dating","basis":"RIB Text Date gives March–9 December 222; its Commentary treats accession-year attribution as probable because no tribunician numeral could fit. The catalogue 231–235 is incompatible.","source_ids":["rib-3522-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"bounded","qualification":"Probable dating in RIB Commentary; not a certain modern correction inferred from emperor name."}],"reason":"RIB Text Date gives March–9 December 222; its Commentary treats accession-year attribution as probable because no tribunician numeral could fit. The catalogue 231–235 is incompatible.","source_ids":["rib-3522-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-44600163"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-11800716":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-11800716","identifiers":["RIB-03, 03525 = AE 1965, 00219 = AE 2005, 00921 = BritRom-10, 00006"],"level":"caution","subtype":"alternative-imperial-reign-chronologies","decision":"retain-source-range-and-show-alternative-not-automatic-redating","reason":"RIB gives the reign range 259–268, while the snapshot has 260–269 and cites later AE records. This review has not collated those AE notices or coin-based reign chronologies. Preserve both as source-dependent alternatives; do not label the catalogue dates false or silently substitute a generic emperor lookup.","raw_snapshot":{"start":260,"end":269,"rawDating":"260 to 269","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"260","dating_to":"269","date_not_before":"260","date_not_after":"269"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-3525-dating-v8","title":"RIB 3525. Milestone of Postumus","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/3525","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"b60fab66eb8fd288f0936caf9707a3f4fdc9919dd7aecca90f8f4ec2a5211549"}],"reported_alternatives":[{"start":259,"end":268,"label":"RIB 3525 published reign chronology","source_ids":["rib-3525-dating-v8"]},{"start":260,"end":269,"label":"Catalogue snapshot chronology; later AE references not collated","source_ids":[]}],"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-11800716"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-05401328":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-05401328","identifiers":["CIL 05, 08074 = InscrIt-11-01, 00119 = MiliariXIRegio 00039 = IAugPraetoria 00077 = SupIt-31, p 323"],"level":"caution","subtype":"tentative-historical-attribution-presented-as-bounded-date","decision":"use-undated-miliage-inscription-and-retain-Augustan-hypothesis","reason":"Calzolari calls the numeral-only marker anonymous and only possibly Augustan. The raw −25–14 is a historical attribution, not a written inscription date. Keep Donnas accessible under uncertain dates; its fixed bedrock relation does not supply a regnal date.","raw_snapshot":{"start":-25,"end":14,"rawDating":"-25 to 14","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"-25","dating_to":"14","date_not_before":"-25","date_not_after":"14"}},"sources":[{"id":"calzolari-68-dating-v8","title":"Mauro Calzolari, Alcune osservazioni sui miliari di età romana dell’Italia settentrionale, no. 68","url":"https://www.centuriazione.it/quaderni_win.asp?id=16","locator":"printed p. 258, catalogue no. 68; ","consultation":"Full PDF text of entry 68 inspected online this turn; CIL V 8074 concordance is publication-reported, not direct CIL collation.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."}],"chronology":{"policy":"uncertainty-only","phases":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"Donnas XXXVI: precise date unestablished","basis":"XXXVI is mileage; Calzolari no. 68 offers only possible Augustan attribution.","source_ids":["calzolari-68-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"undated"}],"reason":"Calzolari calls the numeral-only marker anonymous and only possibly Augustan. The raw −25–14 is a historical attribution, not a written inscription date. Keep Donnas accessible under uncertain dates; its fixed bedrock relation does not supply a regnal date.","source_ids":["calzolari-68-dating-v8"]},"reported_alternatives":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"Possibly Augustan (Calzolari); no numeric replacement imposed","source_ids":["calzolari-68-dating-v8"],"status":"Tentative historical attribution; not a positive dated interval"}],"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-05401328"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-22500786":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-22500786","identifiers":["CIL 10, 08009 = Cornus 00019"],"level":"caution","subtype":"overprecise-single-catalogue-year","decision":"replace-single-year-with-qualified-CIL-Philip-attribution","reason":"CIL X 8009 attributes the record to Philip from the official M. Ulpius Victor and other milestones. The page gives no basis to isolate 244 CE. Use 244–249 as the already documented atlas reign-envelope interpretation, and retain that this is an inferred imperial attribution.","raw_snapshot":{"start":244,"end":244,"rawDating":"244 to 244","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"244","dating_to":"244","date_not_before":"244","date_not_after":"244"}},"sources":[{"id":"cil-x-8009-dating-v8","title":"CIL X/2 (1883), no. 8009","url":"https://arachne.uni-koeln.de/books/CILv10pII1883","locator":"printed p. 833, no. 8009; local source ; page image evidence/cil-x-1883-p833.png","consultation":"Original CIL printed page visually inspected this turn. Mommsen attributes the erased imperial name to Philip by the named procurator and parallels; no single consular/regnal year is given.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","page_image":"evidence/cil-x-1883-p833.png","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."}],"chronology":{"policy":"publication-components","phases":[{"start":244,"end":249,"label":"Philip I attribution: reign-envelope interpretation","basis":"CIL no. 8009 infers sub Philippo from the same procurator on parallel texts; 244–249 is the conventional reign-envelope rendering already recorded in the curated dossier, not a numeral read on this stone.","source_ids":["cil-x-8009-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"bounded","qualification":"Inferred attribution; no exact year established by this record."}],"reason":"CIL X 8009 attributes the record to Philip from the official M. Ulpius Victor and other milestones. The page gives no basis to isolate 244 CE. Use 244–249 as the already documented atlas reign-envelope interpretation, and retain that this is an inferred imperial attribution.","source_ids":["cil-x-8009-dating-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-22500786"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-09300644":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-09300644","identifiers":["AE 1977, 00723"],"level":"caution","subtype":"one-sided-terminus-and-tentative-upper-date","decision":"withhold-apparently-closed-239–300-until-full-publication-collation","reason":"EDH commentary explains 239 as a terminus after the colony status and calls an upper date around 260 only probable on negative comparative evidence. The raw closed 239–300 obscures those meanings. Keep a one-sided lower bound and display the tentative proposal; do not silently change it to certain 239–260.","raw_snapshot":{"start":239,"end":300,"rawDating":"239 to 300","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"239","dating_to":"300","date_not_before":"239","date_not_after":"300"}},"sources":[{"id":"edh-HD020665-dating-v8","title":"EDH HD020665: commentary on AE 1977, 723, Ritopek","url":"https://edh.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/edh/inschrift/HD020665","locator":"EDH commentary and literature fields in the admitted local snapshot; S. Dušanić, ZAnt 27 (1977), pp. 185–190 no. 2 is cited there","consultation":"Local EDH commentary inspected; live EDH retrieval failed. Dušanić article and AE notice not directly inspected in this audit.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","source_class":"catalogue-commentary-not-full-publication"}],"chronology":{"policy":"uncertainty-only","phases":[{"start":239,"end":null,"label":"Not before 239; upper bound unestablished","basis":"EDH commentary reports terminus not before 239 and a probable pre-260 argument attributed to Dušanić; full article not consulted.","source_ids":["edh-HD020665-dating-v8"],"dateStatus":"incomplete","qualification":"Metadata-level review; original publication remains to be collated."}],"reason":"EDH commentary explains 239 as a terminus after the colony status and calls an upper date around 260 only probable on negative comparative evidence. The raw closed 239–300 obscures those meanings. Keep a one-sided lower bound and display the tentative proposal; do not silently change it to certain 239–260.","source_ids":["edh-HD020665-dating-v8"]},"reported_alternatives":[{"start":239,"end":260,"label":"Probable pre-260 proposal reported by EDH from Dušanić","status":"Tentative; not a certain closed interval; full publication uncollated","source_ids":["edh-HD020665-dating-v8"]}],"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-09300644"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-75300297":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-75300297","identifiers":["AE 2016, 01527 = EpRom 2016_43_001"],"level":"caution","subtype":"reversed-source-range","decision":"retain-invalid-state-without-speculative-repair","reason":"Raw 364–357 is reversed. Existing invalid withholding is correct; the named emperors do not authorize guessing that 357 should be 375. Original AE/EpRom publication must be collated before redating.","raw_snapshot":{"start":null,"end":null,"rawDating":"364 to 357","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"364","dating_to":"357","date_not_before":"364","date_not_after":"357"}},"sources":[{"id":"catalogue-EDCS75300297-v8","title":"EDCS-75300297 in admitted snapshot","url":"https://db.edcs.eu/epigr/epi_ergebnis.php?s_sprache=en&edcs_nr=EDCS-75300297","locator":"rawDating and all four numeric date source fields; AE 2016, 1527 = EpRom 2016_43_001","consultation":"Local snapshot inspected. Matching full publication not found in this bounded search; no emperor-based replacement imposed.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","source_class":"catalogue-snapshot"}],"chronology":{"policy":"uncertainty-only","phases":[{"start":null,"end":null,"label":"Reversed catalogue interval: unresolved","basis":"Original values remain 364–357; analytical bounds withheld.","source_ids":["catalogue-EDCS75300297-v8"],"dateStatus":"invalid"}],"reason":"Raw 364–357 is reversed. Existing invalid withholding is correct; the named emperors do not authorize guessing that 357 should be 375. Original AE/EpRom publication must be collated before redating.","source_ids":["catalogue-EDCS75300297-v8"]},"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-75300297"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901051":{"level":"reviewed-control","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901051","identifiers":["CIL 07, 01170 = RIB-01, 02242"],"level":"reviewed-control","subtype":"reviewed-dating-control","decision":"retain-published-catalogue-range","reason":"RIB explicitly gives 307–337 by reign; broad duration alone is not an error.","raw_snapshot":{"start":307,"end":337,"rawDating":"307 to 337","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"307","dating_to":"337","date_not_before":"307","date_not_after":"337"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2242-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2242. Milestone of Constantine I","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2242","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"be246f7294c2e12a3720824d3abfa6b8019ec804290b2897ec53c6db42292498"}],"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901051"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-07901077":{"level":"reviewed-control","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"catalogue_id":"EDCS-07901077","identifiers":["CIL 07, 01174 = RIB-01, 02271"],"level":"reviewed-control","subtype":"reviewed-dating-control","decision":"retain-published-catalogue-range","reason":"RIB explicitly gives 249–251 by reign; preserve the published interval without inventing a year.","raw_snapshot":{"start":249,"end":251,"rawDating":"249 to 251","sourceDates":{"dating_from":"249","dating_to":"251","date_not_before":"249","date_not_after":"251"}},"sources":[{"id":"rib-2271-dating-v8","title":"RIB 2271. Milestone of Decius","url":"https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2271","locator":"Text: Date and Dating criteria; Edition; Commentary and notes","consultation":"Full live corpus HTML sections inspected; no physical autopsy; bibliography concordances do not imply original CIL entry inspected.","consulted_on":"2026-10-17","retrieval_sha256":"bc8e44982cc81bdce22fb9cecbb5ead342ba0b13db1cc1f9da797fb96afabead"}],"id":"catalogue-dating-review-v8-EDCS-07901077"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":false,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-54900234":{"level":"excluded","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reviews":[{"level":"excluded","decision":"reclassified-roadworks","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"label":"Salona: road-building panels, not a mileage marker","reason":"CIL III 3198a + 3200 records road construction on joined panels. Mileage describes roads; it does not turn this public-work inscription into a milestone.","sources":[{"id":"glavas-2016","title":"Ivo Glavaš, The fallacy about the Fifth Dolabella’s Plate in Salona (2016)","url":"https://hrcak.srce.hr/169743","locator":"Tusculum 9 (2016), pp.7–8, first two road inscriptions and CIL concordances; full-text article and translated abstract","consultation":"Full publisher HTML text read on 17 October 2026. Classification concerns the two identified road-building inscriptions, not the disputed fifth plate."}],"limits":["The inscriptions remain evidence for road building. Exclusion concerns milestone identity, not ancient authenticity. The source coordinate remains an unverified catalogue locality."],"id":"catalogue-roadworks-review-v8-EDCS-54900234"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-54900235":{"level":"excluded","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reviews":[{"level":"excluded","decision":"reclassified-roadworks","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"label":"Salona: second road-building inscription, not a milestone","reason":"CIL III 3198b + 3201 is a panel inscription about several roads. Its genuine ancient text and reported lengths are distinct from a roadside mileage marker.","sources":[{"id":"glavas-2016","title":"Ivo Glavaš, The fallacy about the Fifth Dolabella’s Plate in Salona (2016)","url":"https://hrcak.srce.hr/169743","locator":"Tusculum 9 (2016), pp.7–8, first two road inscriptions and CIL concordances; full-text article and translated abstract","consultation":"Full publisher HTML text read on 17 October 2026. Classification concerns the two identified road-building inscriptions, not the disputed fifth plate."}],"limits":["The inscriptions remain evidence for road building. Exclusion concerns milestone identity, not ancient authenticity. The source coordinate remains an unverified catalogue locality."],"id":"catalogue-roadworks-review-v8-EDCS-54900235"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-28600193":{"level":"excluded","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reviews":[{"level":"excluded","decision":"reclassified-bridge-inscription","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"label":"Hippius bridge: building/honorific inscription","reason":"The published catalogue identifies a framed bridge inscription, CIL III 3202 = XVII/4 323a. Its 184 CE date concerns bridge restoration, not a milestone erection.","sources":[{"id":"sacic-2020","title":"Amra Šačić Beća, Reviewing the question of Delminium (2020)","url":"https://godisnjak.anubih.ba/index.php/godisnjak/en/article/download/4/4/10","locator":"Godišnjak 49 (2020), pp.77–78, catalogue no.3, CIL III 3202 = XVII/4 323a;  one-based","consultation":"Full publisher PDF text read on 17 October 2026; catalogue description and inscription identify a bridge-building/honorific record.","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."}],"limits":["Genuine public-work evidence is retained for inspection. Neither its catalogue point nor its text locates a milestone station."],"id":"catalogue-roadworks-review-v8-EDCS-28600193"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-26600085":{"level":"excluded","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"reviews":[{"level":"excluded","decision":"reclassified-rock-roadworks","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":true,"label":"Sarıkaya: rock-cut road restoration record","reason":"The inspected CIL III 346 introduction describes a rock cut for road passage; the bilingual text records restoration without mileage. This is the atlas’s separate R1 roadworks record.","sources":[{"id":"renewed-cil-iii346","title":"Theodor Mommsen, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum III.1 (1873), no.346","url":"https://cil-old.bbaw.de/cil_en/dateien/cil_baende.html","locator":"Printed p.61, no.346;  one-based, introduction, bilingual text and apparatus","consultation":"Exact local public-domain scan extracted and page image directly inspected on 17 October 2026; original ancient support not personally inspected.","consulted":true,"corpus_volume":"cil-iii-1873","page_image":"evidence/cil-iii-1873-p61.png","page_image_note":"Public-domain nineteenth-century edition; selected page rendered for source inspection; printed p. 61","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."},{"id":"renewed-phi-iznik13","title":"IK Iznik 13, PHI Greek Inscriptions PH277805","url":"https://epigraphy.packhum.org/text/277805","locator":"Heading; Latin lines1–6 and Greek lines7–13","consultation":"Full corpus transcription inspected online. Heading58AD; local EDCS/CIL envelope58–59 retained rather than selecting an unsupported precise date.","consulted":true}],"related_case_id":"sarikaya-cil-iii346-roadworks","limits":["Already reviewed in the R1 dossier; this pass makes the bulk-catalogue classification consistent. The wrong homonymous EDCS locality remains under the existing coordinate quarantine."],"id":"catalogue-roadworks-review-v8-EDCS-26600085"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-31400384":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"level":"caution","decision":"original-setting-unlocated-and-locality-conflict","label":"Lukavac / Lukavica: original findspot unknown","reason":"Ballif 1893 p.39 explicitly distinguishes the fragment then lying near Lukavica from its untraceable original findspot; p.51 no.46 does not mark it in situ. Popović 2019 p.202 repeats that the exact location is unknown and places Lukavica on the Studeni Jadar route near Milići. The imported Lukavac point has no documented surveying or geocoding attribution in the supplied snapshot. It cannot test distance from an original roadside setting.","withhold_coordinate":true,"withhold_comparison":true,"exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"sources":[{"id":"edcs-local","type":"local metadata snapshot","url":"https://db.edcs.eu/epigr/epi.php?s_sprache=en","locator":"EDCS-31400384; exact imported fields preserved above","consulted":"Full local row inspected; upstream numeric-coordinate authorship unresolved","title":"https://db.edcs.eu/epigr/epi.php?s_sprache=en"},{"id":"edh-local","type":"local metadata snapshot","url":"https://edh.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/edh/inschrift/HD057720","locator":"HD057720; findspot, findspot_modern, present_location, responsible_individual, Longitude, Latitude, literature, last_update","consulted":"Full local row inspected; live page retrieval failed","title":"https://edh.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/edh/inschrift/HD057720"},{"id":"ballif-1893-p39","type":"published survey, primary historical source","title":"Philipp Ballif, Römische Strassen in Bosnien und der Hercegovina (Wien 1893)","url":"https://www.cidom.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Philipp-Ballif-Romische-strassen-in-Bosnien-und-der-Hercegovina-1893_opt.pdf#page=47","locator":"Printed p.39, final paragraph;  of 108","consulted":"Full page image rendered and visually inspected; OCR checked against scan","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."},{"id":"ballif-1893-p51","type":"published survey, primary historical source","title":"Ballif 1893, milestone inventory","url":"https://www.cidom.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Philipp-Ballif-Romische-strassen-in-Bosnien-und-der-Hercegovina-1893_opt.pdf#page=59","locator":"Printed p.51 no.46;  of 108; in-situ column shows a dash","consulted":"Full page image rendered and visually inspected","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."},{"id":"patsch-1893-p69","type":"published epigraphic edition, primary historical source","title":"Karl Patsch, appendix in Ballif 1893","url":"https://www.cidom.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Philipp-Ballif-Romische-strassen-in-Bosnien-und-der-Hercegovina-1893_opt.pdf#page=77","locator":"Printed p.69 no.46;  of 108","consulted":"Full page image rendered and visually inspected","locator_status":"Published page locator supplied in the recorded citation; verification and reuse limits remain separate."},{"id":"popovic-2019","type":"peer-reviewed scholarly publication","title":"Goran D. Popović, Milestones from the Roman Road Drinjača–Sarajevsko Polje, Collection of Papers of the Faculty of Philosophy XLIX(3), 2019, 201–211","doi":"10.5937/ZRFFP49-23025","url":"https://aseestant.ceon.rs/index.php/zrffp/article/download/23025/8360/","locator":"pp.202–203 for locality, unknown exact position, Volusianus/date; p.209 table1; pp.206–207 for route-level honorary interpretation","consulted":"Full 11-page publisher PDF retrieved; relevant full text inspected"},{"id":"cil-iii-13316","type":"corpus concordance, not newly page-checked","title":"CIL III 13316","url":"https://cil.bbaw.de/en/","locator":"CIL III 13316","consulted":"Concordance supplied by EDCS, EDH and Popović 2019; exact original page not inspected"},{"id":"cil-xvii4-442","type":"corpus concordance, not newly page-checked","title":"CIL XVII 4, 442","url":"https://cil.bbaw.de/en/","locator":"CIL XVII 4, 442; EDH also lists figures alpha/beta","consulted":"Concordance supplied by EDCS/EDH; text and figures not inspected"}],"audit_file":"alignment-lukavac-v9.md","coordinate_attribution":"The EDCS-derived number has no named georeferencer. Ballif/Patsch recorded the historical fragment; Gräf is responsible for the linked EDH record, whose coordinate fields are null. Neither is established as the numeric point's creator.","id":"catalogue-coordinate-review-v9-EDCS-31400384"}],"withhold_coordinate":true,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-60100066":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"level":"caution","decision":"displaced-object-unlocated-earlier-findspot","label":"Karayakup / RRMAM 3.3 no. 026: location history limits alignment","reason":"The catalogue village pin cannot represent an original roadside point when the primary publication reports movement from another locality about 8 km north. Neither location has surveyed object coordinates here, and the road association is assumed.","withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"sources":[{"id":"alignment-french2012-rrmam33","title":"David H. French, Roman Roads and Milestones of Asia Minor 3.3: Cappadocia (2012)","url":"https://doi.org/10.18866/BIAA/e-03","archive_url":"https://web.archive.org/web/20150919091733/http://biaa.ac.uk/ckeditor/filemanager/userfiles/3.3%20cappadocia.pdf","locator":"p. 53 no. 026 Karayakup; p. 19 route A.9; plate 7.1.14 on p. 378","consultation":"Full archived publisher PDF retrieved; text on p. 53 extracted and rendered page inspected. Plate reference collated in contents but photograph not used to derive coordinates.","sha256":"32173812d14f60205363fd10756f6f2cff28701c6dbf8b76eb88b3d343004f24","bytes":46687552,"distribution_policy":"Retained research copy outside the published site; link to source, do not redistribute full modern publication."}],"audit_file":"alignment-turkey-v9.md","coordinate_attribution":"The numeric pair is transmitted from the EDCS extract; its individual creator, method and accuracy are unknown. French's dated copying/observation and any reported earlier village origin are object-history evidence, not attribution of these numeric coordinates.","id":"catalogue-coordinate-review-v9-EDCS-60100066"}],"withhold_coordinate":false,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false},"EDCS-70200077":{"level":"caution","exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"reviews":[{"level":"caution","decision":"catalogue-locality-conflict-and-displaced-object","label":"Bağlıca near Boyabat / Sinop Museum 3 / RRMAM 3.4 no. 44(C): location history limits alignment","reason":"The raw catalogue pin is not a surveyed findspot and conflicts with the corpus's Boyabat attribution. The object was recorded in Sinop Museum; its village origin rests on a named headman's report, while original erection and route remain uncertain.","withhold_coordinate":true,"withhold_comparison":true,"exclude_from_milestone_analysis":false,"sources":[{"id":"alignment-french2013-rrmam34","title":"David H. French, Roman Roads and Milestones of Asia Minor 3.4: Pontus et Bithynia (with Northern Galatia) (2013)","url":"https://doi.org/10.18866/BIAA/e-04","archive_url":"https://web.archive.org/web/20220107225911/https://biaa.ac.uk/ckeditor/filemanager/userfiles/electronic_publications/P_et_B_final.pdf","locator":"pp. 86–87 no. 44(C) Sinop 3; p. 9 sections 3.1 and 3.3; pp. 21–22 route F.2; plate 7.1.31 on p. 194","consultation":"Full publication collated; rendered p. 86 inspected. Archived publisher PDF also retrieved. Map scale convention read directly on p. 9; no numerical original-location coordinates supplied in no. 44(C).","bytes":20868254,"distribution_policy":"Retained research copy outside the published site; link to source, do not redistribute full modern publication."},{"id":"alignment-aydogdu-bakirci2020-baglica","title":"Müjde Aydoğdu and Muzaffer Bakırcı, Analysis of the Attractive Factors in Visiting Rural Areas: The Case of Bağlıca Village (Boyabat/Sinop), Coğrafya Dergisi 40 (2020)","url":"https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2019-0035","download_url":"https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1063019","locator":"p. 4 section 3 and figures 1–2","consultation":"Publisher PDF read and p. 4 rendered: an independent geographical study locates the named village in Boyabat district, five kilometres from Boyabat, beside the Gökırmak. It is a locality check, not milestone findspot evidence or a source of surveyed milestone coordinates."}],"audit_file":"alignment-turkey-v9.md","coordinate_attribution":"The numeric pair is transmitted from the EDCS extract; its individual creator, method and accuracy are unknown. French's dated copying/observation and any reported earlier village origin are object-history evidence, not attribution of these numeric coordinates.","id":"catalogue-coordinate-review-v9-EDCS-70200077"}],"withhold_coordinate":true,"withhold_comparison":true,"withhold_edh_enrichment":false}},"counts":{"catalogue":8483,"reviewed_records":58,"review_decisions":63,"levels":{"excluded":13,"caution":41,"reviewed-control":4},"chronology_overlays":26,"coordinate_withheld":3,"screened_flagged_records":401,"screening_flags":{"broad-source-range":238,"different-partner-type":31,"questioned-partner-type":39,"unresolved-source-dating":11,"starred-cil-concordance":112}}}