{"assessment_date":"2026-10-17","scope":"Bounded repeat search and source audit; no comprehensive corpus coverage or independent field verification claimed.","admitted_case_ids":["amastris-kuskayasi-aquila-roadworks","cyrene-c537-claudius-mile1","el-qusayyibe-east-imc293","sarikaya-cil-iii346-roadworks","tabula-traiana-roadworks"],"roadworks_case_ids":["tabula-traiana-roadworks","sarikaya-cil-iii346-roadworks","amastris-kuskayasi-aquila-roadworks"],"milestone_case_ids":["el-qusayyibe-east-imc293","cyrene-c537-claudius-mile1"],"reports":[{"file":"renewed-danube.json","report":"renewed-danube.md","case_ids":["tabula-traiana-roadworks"],"search_log":[{"queries":["Tabula Traiana original road CIL1699 relocation report","site:heritage.gov.rs Izmestanje Trajanove table1969"],"outcome":"Official article found and downloaded; original-context photograph and actual relocation year checked against CIL and modern corpus."}],"audit_findings":[{"id":"tabula-actual-relocation-year","decision":"Separate original cliff from raised display.","finding":"Primary conservation report dates the actual lift to autumn1969; original inscription and a road section were moved together, with no original GPS point inferred."}],"research_leads":[]},{"file":"renewed-rupestral.json","report":"renewed-rupestral.md","case_ids":["sarikaya-cil-iii346-roadworks","amastris-kuskayasi-aquila-roadworks"],"search_log":[{"query":"TabulaTraiana original location moved1972 CILIII1699; GospodjinVir Domitian CIL13813d; Sarikaya CILIII346 survey","result":"TabulaTraiana delegated to root; revised1969relocation lead passed. Gospodjin directcorpus blocker retained."},{"query":"Kuşkayası Aquila CIL6983; CILIII346 LakeIznik; livingrockmilestone; miliariorupestre","result":"Kuşkayası physicalroad/panel supported; Sarikaya originalsetting established byCIL. Soutelo no82lead found. No new strictT1."},{"query":"LocalEDCS fullcorpus exact IDs EDCS26600085,29601704,26900107 andlocalCILIII pages125/128","result":"Sarikaya wronghomonymcoordinate found. Amasra cataloguepointtownproxy, notmonument."},{"access":"PublisherWu2025PDF downloaded(13031545bytes,sha256a15cb3800746b557263f6815364613892c6ad9e42126933c03412b7e86b74309); [workstation path omitted]","result":"Textdirectlyread. ModernsourcePDFnotforredistribution."},{"access":"WeissovathesisdirectURL","result":"HTTP429/HTMLfailure; only exactindexedp257excerptconsulted; fullsourceconsultationnotclaimed."}],"audit_findings":[{"id":"sarikaya-homonym-coordinate","severity":"high","catalogue_id":"EDCS-26600085","raw_coordinates":[35.37671,39.495338],"finding":"Source point is a central-Anatolian Sarikaya homonym, incompatible with CILIII346 southernLakeIzniksetting.","action":"Recommend global coordinate quarantine while preserving source bytes; case original point null.","source_ids":["renewed-cil-iii346","renewed-phi-iznik13"]},{"id":"kuskayasi-career-not-consuldate","finding":"Aquila’s two consular registrations arecareerreferences, not joint eponymous date.","source_ids":["renewed-edcs26900107","renewed-phi-amastris1c"]},{"id":"fixed-inscription-not-mileage","finding":"Roadrestoration/makingverbs do not supplymilestonefunction. Separate R1class preventsartificial T1expansion.","source_ids":["renewed-cil-iii346","renewed-phi-amastris1c"]}],"research_leads":[{"id":"gospodjin-vir-domitian-recheck","label":"Gospodjin Vir CILIII13813d=13813a / ILS9373","decision":"Withhold new R1 admission in this bounded pass; retain road-repair evidence in the review queue.","verified":"Benea2011p8 explicitly connects rock-cut Danube road repair with Domitian92–93 and citesCILIII13813d in note2. LocalEDCS names iterScorfularum and Danube damage; erased Domitianus.","limits":["Direct CILIII13813d page and Vulić1942/43 photographs still not obtained.","Official Geopark lists GospodjinVir road/tower as submerged, but this general notice does not independently prove the individual Domitianic panel’s survival, removal or exact inundation point.","Do not borrow TabulaTraiana relocation history.","No numerical coordinate admitted from the broad EDCSDrencova point."],"sources":[{"id":"renewed-benea2011-gospodjin","title":"DoinaBenea, Cu privire la relaţiile militare interprovinciale dintre Dacia şi Moesia Superior, BHAUTXIII(2011),7–26","url":"https://csiatim.uvt.ro/NOU/BHAUT/ro/pdf/2011_art01.pdf","locator":"p8/, openingparagraph andnote2","consultation":"Full university-hostedPDF text directlyinspected.","locator_status":"Published page locator not supplied; use the named work, chapter or ancient passage."},{"id":"renewed-geopark-cultural-sites","title":"ĐerdapUNESCOGeopark, Cultural heritage sites","url":"https://geoparkdjerdap.rs/en/cultural-heritage-sites/","locator":"Introductoryinundationdiscussion andinventoryno15GospodjinVir","consultation":"Official indexedinventoryinspected; generalcontext only, notindividualpanelcustody."}]},{"id":"soutelo-pipa-rupestral-lead","label":"Soutelo/Chaves, Pipa rock inscription, RodríguezColmeneroetal2004no82","decision":"New lead passed to root for independent followup; not admitted.","sources":[{"title":"Miliarios e outras inscricións viarias romanas do noroeste hispánico(2004)","url":"https://consellodacultura.gal/mediateca/extras/CCG_2004_Miliarios-e-outras-inscricions-viarias-romanas-do-noroeste-hispanico-conventos-bracarense-lucense-e-asturicense.pdf","locator":"No82, Inscrición viaria rupestre(Soutelo,Chaves)","consultation":"Indexedentryexcerpt only; uncertainreading/functionnotresolved."}]},{"id":"paiva-cil-ii6211-recheck","label":"Paiva CILII6211","decision":"Keep withheld; no new evidence overturns Alarcão’s honorific interpretation, nor proves continuous original bedrock or a physical road relation.","sources":[{"title":"Alarcão2005, OterritóriodosPaesvri","url":"https://ap1.sib.uc.pt/bitstream/10316.2/37810/1/o_territorio_dos_paesvri_e_as_suas_principais_povoacoes.pdf","locator":"p160","consultation":"Previouslycollatedprojectsource; no newfullsourceinspectioninthispass."}]}]},{"file":"renewed-west-audit.json","report":"renewed-west-audit.md","case_ids":[],"search_log":[{"queries":["Roman milestone excavated socket in situ Britain","miliario in situ excavación calzada original base","miliario rinvenuto in situ strada scavo"],"outcome":"No additional fully inspected original-installation pair; broad results generate AlbaFucens and Arsoli leads."},{"queries":["site:romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions milestone original position","site:romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions milestone in situ","miliario alveolo calzada","miliario scavo Alba Fucens Magnentio"],"outcome":"RIB2244 conditional setting; RIB2221 clear negative control; original AlbaFucens report locator identified."},{"queries":["milestone excavation original position Roman Britain","miliario in situ basamento Valeria","miliario in situ alveolo","Roman milestone socket"],"outcome":"No new full report meeting all gates; discarded cross sockets and reused stones."},{"queries":["miliario sede originaria scavo","miliario base in situ scavo strada romana","miliario alveolo romana","Goudineau1977 LaTurbie miliaire"],"outcome":"LaTurbie606 base lead found through scholarly bibliographic notice."},{"queries":["LaTurbie base606 milliaire","miliario98 Carcaboso Paniagua","AlbaFucens Magnenzio in situ","Goudineau1977 505-510"],"outcome":"Carcaboso tentative surface find withheld; discovered distinction between fullGallia article495–510 and departmental subsection505–510."},{"queries":["site:persee.fr CôteAzur1977 GoudineauGallia","galia_0016-4119_1977 505","Goudineau LaTurbie base1976"],"outcome":"PrimaryGallia metadata accessible; target final page attempts failed; directPDF403."},{"queries":["Goudineau1977 Turbie socle","Goudineau mille606","LaTurbie1975 borne base"],"outcome":"No new primary target-page access. Gazetteer/tourism repetitions do not establish another independent report."}],"audit_findings":[{"id":"renewed-donnas-fixedness-not-road-phase","case_id":"donnas-rupestral-cil-v-8074","decision":"Retain T1 with existing phase distinction.","source_ids":["donnas-regional-heritage","donnas-schneider-2007"],"locators":["Regional heritage Donnas section, Sono interamente ricavati","Schneider2007 pp.143–145, "],"verified":"Mileage marker is carved in bedrock by a Roman passage. Schneider separates visible ruts from the original road level.","independence":"Regional and scholarly descriptions do not demonstrate source independence for an individual reconstructed road segment.","chronology":"No exact inscription date or contemporary surviving pavement established.","new_source_or_tier_change":false},{"id":"renewed-smith-road-fabric-limitation","case_id":"rib-2308-smiths-shield","decision":"Retain T2a original base; add explicit unexcavated-road-form qualification.","source_ids":["rib2308-corpus","he1014820-stanegate"],"locators":["RIB2308 Support, Other events and Modern location; Text/Date; Apparatus","NHLE1014820 Reasons for Designation, paragraph starting Roman roads were artificially made-up routes; Details, Stanegate/milestones paragraphs"],"verified":"RIB states base remains in position and distinguishes shaft fragments145mwest. NHLE local road course is interpreted below the modern road but its form had not been archaeologically examined.","independence":"Different published narratives; no independent socket excavation or Itiner-e source genealogy established.","chronology":"Primary date uncertain; secondary fourth-century textual-context dating; no road-layer match.","new_source_or_tier_change":false},{"id":"renewed-fs12-measured-road-and-socket","case_id":"taucheira-fs12-primary-socket","decision":"Retain T2a context and coarse T5 locator.","source_ids":["weber-berger2016-fs12"],"locators":["printed pp.24–25; figs1–3; p.25 n.4"],"verified":"Firsthand survey describes physical road, original socket and fallen shaft. The other Tetrarchic milestone is a separate object; transfer is a recommendation.","independence":"One firsthand survey record; later repetition does not create a second observation.","chronology":"FS12 inscription unread/undated. Typological road attribution does not supply an installation year.","new_source_or_tier_change":false},{"id":"renewed-catez-exposed-seating","case_id":"catez-iljug-1176-primary-setting","decision":"Retain T2a exposed original seating and coarse T5 search area.","source_ids":["petru1961-catez","lovenjak1997-context"],"locators":["Petru1961 pp.27–29/, figs1–3, p.28 seating and6.40mroad","Lovenjak1997 p.89"],"verified":"Petru describes blasting, base in a depression and a measured road profile, followed by six surviving fragments in Brezice museum.","independence":"Later source depends on Petru; do not count as independent excavation.","chronology":"139–141CE is qualified by fragmentary tribunician numerals. Road-surface date and1958/1959 discovery-year conflict remain distinct.","new_source_or_tier_change":false},{"id":"renewed-casa-campo-near-road-not-original-socket","case_id":"cil-ii-4644","decision":"Retain T2b; original installation unproved.","source_ids":["paredes-2023","cil-ii-1869-4644"],"locators":["Paredes2023 pp.39–42/; p.41 coordinate and modern movement; n.35 restoration references"],"verified":"Author inspected object20Nov2020; reports fence-post reuse and a modern shift of several metres beside a restored/excavated road. His original-position conclusion is interpretive.","independence":"Object autopsy is direct; the separately cited road-restoration references are newspaper reports, not an inspected stratigraphic discovery report.","chronology":"50CE concerns reconstructed titulature. No dated original socket or contemporary road layer demonstrated.","new_source_or_tier_change":false}],"research_leads":[{"id":"la-turbie-606-primary-base-renewed","label":"La Turbie, mile606 milestone base","proposed_decision":"High-priority primary-context lead; withhold T2a until relevant original report pages inspected.","source_urls":["https://www.persee.fr/doc/galia_0016-4119_1977_num_35_2_1580","https://www.storiapatriagenova.eu/Docs/Biblioteca_Digitale/SB/396b22c37e8bbc6c44c30828fc127900/Estratti/fedc3f3146e51fa0510152ae62e5fdcf.pdf"],"locators":["Goudineau1977 Gallia35.2 pp.495–510; Alpes-Maritimes pp.505–510","Scholarly bibliographic notice printedp.350 entry106"],"consultation":"Persée article metadata and initial page read; relevant final pages inaccessible; . Bibliographic notice passage checked through indexed text.","finding":"Secondary bibliographic notice reports an original-position base. Exact object join, inscription, context and coordinate remain uncollated.","next_requirement":"Obtain final Gallia pages and underlying field report; identify base, shaft, road surface and custody separately.","coordinates":null},{"id":"alba-fucens-lxviii-magnentius-renewed","label":"Alba Fucens, Magnenzio milestone LXVIII","proposed_decision":"Withhold high-tier admission pending1949–1950 discovery report and object edition.","source_urls":["https://www.lumenassociazione.it/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/lumen_70.pdf","https://sabapchpe.cultura.gov.it/lavori/sito-archeologico-di-alba-fucens-massa-dalbe-2/963/"],"locators":["Castellani regional article pp.31–33, item16 and n.45–46","F.deVisscher–F.deRuyt–V.Cianfarani, NS1950 pp.250–251, bibliographic lead not inspected","Soprintendenza report, Lotto2, 2020 excavation"],"consultation":"Indexed regional article text only; full official2020 excavation webpage inspected. Original1950 report not inspected.","finding":"The original milestone and current onsite cast must be separate. Official modern road excavation does not alone document the marker's primary installation. FlaviusRomulus actor reading requires edition verification.","next_requirement":"Inspect original NS1950 report and Camodeca ZPE28(1978),151–158; verify road relation, discovery coordinates and custody.","coordinates":null},{"id":"arsoli-xxxviii-pair-renewed","label":"Arsoli, two Valeria XXXVIII markers","proposed_decision":"Withhold T2a; full specialist provenance passage unavailable in this pass.","source_urls":["https://www.aequa.org/v1/index.php/i-due-miliari-xxxviii-della-valeria-ad-arsoli/"],"locators":["Indexed specialist article opening scope and Maxentian Vignale discovery passage"],"consultation":"Search-index text only; direct page fetch failed.","finding":"Article distinguishes two same-distance objects and debates original road course. An indexed original-position phrase cannot resolve physical installation or be promoted into inspected excavation evidence.","next_requirement":"Inspect full article, original discovery report and exact separate object identities; do not merge same mileage stones.","coordinates":null},{"id":"carcaboso-mile98-primary-setting-renewed","label":"Carcaboso, proposed mile98 new surface milestone","proposed_decision":"Withhold T2a pending full report and original base/road relation.","source_urls":["https://www.caparra.es/archivospdf/30-2007.pdf"],"locators":["Section Miliario98–Carcaboso(inédito), footnote9"],"consultation":"Indexed report passage only; fullPDF fetch failed.","finding":"In-situ claim, fragmentary stone and uncertain lettering. Indexed97–119 date and Trajan/Hadrian attribution are tentative and not adopted.","next_requirement":"Obtain report, object autopsy, physical road record and specific installation evidence; do not use uprightness alone.","coordinates":null},{"id":"rib2221-in-situ-metadata-negative-control","label":"Silchester Impstone, RIB2221","proposed_decision":"Exclude from primary roadside admission; preserve as provenance-metadata negative control.","source_urls":["https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2221"],"locators":["Support, Institution/acc.# versus Commentary and notes"],"consultation":"Full online corpus entry inspected17Oct2026.","finding":"Institution field says in situ while commentary discusses possible movement800m to later boundary. Milestone identification itself remains possible, not secure.","next_requirement":"Resolve function and historical transport before any primary-setting tier.","coordinates":null},{"id":"rib2244-conditional-original-position-recheck","label":"Thurmaston Hadrian milestone, existing RIB2244 dossier","proposed_decision":"Retain existing lower-tier classification; no promotion from good titulature dating.","source_urls":["https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2244"],"locators":["Date119–120; Commentary, conditional in-situ statement and distance discrepancy"],"consultation":"Full corpus entry inspected17Oct2026.","finding":"Original position is conditional in the edition despite a narrowly datable text. Epigraphic dating and original roadside station are independent tests.","coordinates":null}]},{"file":"primary-expansion-renewed-east.json","report":"primary-expansion-renewed-east.md","case_ids":["el-qusayyibe-east-imc293","cyrene-c537-claudius-mile1"],"search_log":[{"query":"Bet Netofa/Eshkol Tepperand Isaac 2018 fullreports","outcome":"Official abstracts and 2014 full web report read;2018 PDFs 403,JSTOR 420;withheld"},{"query":"Local Isaac–Roll 1982 in-situcatalogue","outcome":"V 3/V 4 secondary dressing conflict confirmed;other locations often in situ or nearby;no T2a promotion"},{"query":"Southern Golanin-situstationsand 2024 field study","outcome":"Full university PDF retrieved,road/stonesfig 4 inspected;oneobject IMC293 admitted T2bwith T5 station-area locator"},{"query":"Local IRCyr XMLmilestoneswithoriginal/re-erectedprovenance","outcome":"C.537 live corpus checked;T3 admitted;dateconflictandplatformfull textlimitretained"}],"audit_findings":[{"id":"renewed-east-no-new-primary-installation","finding":"No case in this packet meets T2a: roadmap co-occurrence, corpusinsitu and modern re-erection are not interchangeable with primary installation."},{"id":"c537-corpus-date-conflict","finding":"Headline 45–46 CEversuscommentary 44–47 alternatives recorded;do not present exact 45/46 as settled."},{"id":"qusayyibe-road-date-not-stone-date","finding":"IMC293 hasno inscription. Regional Nawa 161/2,and tower late second/third-century pottery,do not date this stone."},{"id":"bet-netofa-language-metadata-conflict","finding":"Preliminary Constantinian Greekversusfinalabstract Latin:full editionneededbeforetext-language admission."}],"research_leads":[{"id":"bet-netofa-eshkol-station","label":"Bet Neṭofa/Eshkol three inscribed milestones and bases","status":"Withheld from T2aagain; full 2018 excavation and epigraphy unavailable","sources":[{"url":"https://hadashot.iaa.org.il/Report_Detail_Eng.aspx?id=11631&mag_id=121","locator":"Full 2014 excavatorreport,Milestone Station","consultation":"Re-read in full"},{"url":"https://publications.iaa.org.il/atiqot/vol93/iss1/4/","locator":"Tepper 2018 abstract;full textdownload 403","consultation":"Abstract only; fullpaper not obtained"},{"url":"https://publications.iaa.org.il/atiqot/vol93/iss1/5/","locator":"Isaac 2018 abstract;full textdownload 403;JSTOR 26563137 download 420","consultation":"Abstract only; publicationyear 2018 confirmed by Tel Aviv University record"}],"next_step":"Collate original base-to-shaft relations. Preliminary 2014 report calls the Constantinian text Greek; final 2018 abstracts call all three Latin, so language is not silently harmonized."},{"id":"legio-scythopolis-mile-v3-v4","label":"Legio–Scythopolis V 3 and V 4","status":"Retain withheld: in-situ statement conflicts with explicit secondary dressing","sources":[{"url":"https://milestones.kinneret.ac.il/en/info-about-milestones/north/","locator":"Isaac–Roll 1982 p.57,Mile V,V 3 and V 4","consultation":"Full local catalogue passage re-read"}],"next_step":"Resolve whether original station remained known through later reuse; neither bareinsitu nor two-sided chiselling alone supplies the needed sequence."},{"id":"golan-other-qusayyibe-milestones","label":"El-Qusayyibe East IMC408,409 and 415; easterntower IMC 417–419,423","status":"Distinct catalogued objects, held as leads; do not inflate IMC293 casecount","sources":[{"url":"https://pure.au.dk/ws/files/432768664/Between_Gaulanitis_and_Hippos_The_Roman_Road_in_the_Southern_Golan_Heights_in_Context.pdf","locator":"p.101 Milestones;fig.4 p.102;footnote 2 p.96","consultation":"Relevantfull text andfig 4 inspected"},{"url":"https://milestones.kinneret.ac.il/en/info-about-milestones/north/","locator":"Golan Heights–Lawieh ridge rows","consultation":"Full catalogue rows read"}],"next_step":"Add individual dossiers only after separate identity and condition review. All remain undated without inscription evidence."},{"id":"bet-hananya-submerged-road-hypothesis","label":"BetḤananya milestone below Canal B arch","status":"Usefulcounterexample: publication arguesinsitu but associatedroadsegment postulated/submerged","sources":[{"url":"https://publications.iaa.org.il/atiqot/vol110/iss1/11/","locator":"Officialabstract","consultation":"Abstractonly;no full publisher PDF obtained"}],"next_step":"Inspectfull Ecker,Tepperand Karasik 2023 pp.129–148;do not convert a well-locatedcolumn into an independently observedroadpair."},{"id":"migdal-imc847-secondary-custody","label":"Migdal IMC 847 and IMC 694","status":"Full 2024 studyconfirms farmerreportedfinds then courtyardcustody; notprimary socket proof","sources":[{"url":"https://milestones.kinneret.ac.il/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/The-Fifth-Milestation-from-Tiberias-A-Newly-Discovered-Milestone-in-the-Gennesaret-Valley-Illumines-the-Roman-Arterial-Network.pdf","locator":"pp.1,5–9","consultation":"Full article text read"}],"next_step":"If admittedlater, preserve second-handfindlocality andcourtyardlocation separately; Hadrian 120 and Tiberiascaput are publishedinterpretations,not newly excavatedalignment."}]}],"strict_t1_added":0,"independence_note":"A documented local pairing is not yet an independent check on a particular Itiner-e segment. Segment bibliography and source genealogy remain to be audited."}