1. Metadata1. 元数据
2. Text + translation + commentary (verbatim OCR)2. 文本 + 翻译 + 评注(逐字 OCR)
3. Slot-by-slot decomposition3. 逐栏分解
| Slot栏位 | Function功能 | Surface form (as preserved or restored)表层形式(按保存或复原) | Formula UID公式编号 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enactment formula颁行公式 | ἔδοχσεν τε̃ι βολε̃ι καὶ τõι δέμοι | F.EDOXEN_BD (ETBKTD, pre-403 archaic spelling)(ETBKTD,公元前 403 年前的古拼写) |
| 2 | Prytany clause值勤部族条款 | Ἀκαμαντὶς ἐπρυτάνευε | F.EPI_PRYTANEIAS |
| 3 | Secretary clause书记条款 | Φιλόμηλος ἐγραμμάτευε | F.EGRAMMATEUEN |
| 4 | Chairman / epistates主席(epistates) | Ἰσοτιμίδες ἐπεστάτε | F.EPESTATEI |
| 5 | Proposer提案人 | Διογνητος εἶπε | F.EIPEN |
| 6 | Republication directive重新公布指令 | (text of the lex republished verbatim)(所重新公布的法律的逐字文本) | meta-formula: republication-as-decree元公式:以法令形式重新公布 |
| 7 | Substantive law实质性法律 | καὶ ἐὰν μὲ ἐκ προνοίας κτείνηι… ἐπὶ Δράκοντος ἄρχοντος | embedded conditional-law clauses (Drakonian)内嵌的条件式法律条款(德拉古式) |
4. Historical context4. 历史背景
The OR 2017 commentary (p. 561 onwards, OCR'd verbatim) discusses the late-5th-century Athenian republication of older laws, including the Drakonian homicide statute. The republication is preserved as a single inscription combining the authorising decree (with standard EBKTD prescript) and the substantive law (introduced by conditional ἐὰν μή clauses).OR 2017 的评注(自第 561 页起,已逐字 OCR)论及公元前五世纪末雅典对旧法的重新公布,其中包括德拉古杀人法。此次重新公布以单一铭文保存下来,兼含授权法令(附标准 EBKTD 前言)与实质性法律(以条件式 ἐὰν μή 从句引入)。
Paraphrase, not direct quotation: the institutional significance of this case for the formula dossier is that the republication-authorising decree carries a standard late-5th-c. Athenian prescript, while the substantive law it republishes uses the conditional-law genre. Both are recognisable formulae bundles. The two together anticipate the Lykourgan-era nomothesia procedure (a topic where Henry 1977 and Rhodes & Lewis 1997 — both in-folder — give the diachronic framing).转述,非直引:本案例对公式文献集的制度意义在于:授权重新公布的法令带有标准的公元前五世纪末雅典式前言,而其所重新公布的实质性法律则采用条件式法律体例。两者都是可以辨识的公式组合。把它们放在一起看,就预示了吕库古时代的立法程序(nomothesia)——关于这个专题,Henry 1977 和 Rhodes & Lewis 1997(两者都在文件夹内)提供了历时性的框架。
5. Additional scholarship5. 补充学术文献
"Apart from these few isolated cases, however, the extant material provides clear evidence to support a division of prescripts (for the purpose of description) into two basic types: Type I: prescript without archon. In this type the following items appear, normally in the order shown — formula of enactment ἔδοχσεν τει βολει και τοι δέμοι / name of prytanising tribe ἡ δεῖνα ἐπρυτάνευε / name of secretary ὁ δεῖνα ἐγραμμάτευε / name of chairman ὁ δεῖνα ἐπεστάτε / name of proposer of motion ὁ δεῖνα εἶπε."— Henry 1977, pp. 7–8 — verbatim fromdossier_workspace/excerpts_greek_decrees_A.md. The republication-decree of OR 183 is a Type I (no archon) prescript exactly fitting Henry's pattern.逐字录自dossier_workspace/excerpts_greek_decrees_A.md。OR 183 的重新公布法令属于第一型(无执政官)前言,正好符合 Henry 的范式。(上方英文引文按 M18 政策保留原文,不作翻译。)
6. Cross-references6. 交叉引用
7. Bibliography (in-folder files only)7. 参考文献(仅限文件夹内文件)
- Osborne, R., & Rhodes, P. J. (2017). Greek Historical Inscriptions, 478–404 BC. Oxford. OR 183, pp. 561–567. In folder文件夹内.
- Meiggs, R., & Lewis, D. M. (1969). ML 86. In folder文件夹内.
- Henry, A. S. (1977). The Prescripts of Athenian Decrees. Mnemosyne Suppl. 49. Leiden. In folder文件夹内.
- Rhodes, P. J., with Lewis, D. M. (1997). The Decrees of the Greek States. Oxford. In folder文件夹内.
Every entry above points to a file present in the dossier's local general knowledge folder, or to one of the excerpts files in dossier_workspace/. Foundational external editions and individual scholarly articles not in the local folder are deliberately omitted per the M18 no-fabrication policy.以上每一条目均指向本文献集本地 general knowledge 文件夹中现存的文件,或 dossier_workspace/ 中的某一摘录文件。所有不在本地文件夹内的基础性外部校本和单篇学术论文,都依据 M18 无杜撰政策有意略去。