Your Latin and Greek attempts save separately in this browser.拉丁语及希腊语尝试分别保存在本浏览器中。
Export data导出数据
If the download does not appear, copy this JSON and save it as a .json file.如未出现下载，可复制此 JSON 并保存为 .json 文件。
Compare your choices比较你的选择
Read one possible answer and its reasoning查看一种可能的例答及解释
Quid dux facit?
Quid asks for the missing information. A neutral yes/no question can use -ne. Nōnne commonly presumes yes and num commonly presumes no; these are expectations, not proof of the eventual answer.Quid 询问缺少的信息。中性的是否问句可用 -ne。Nōnne 通常预设肯定，num 通常预设否定；预设并不证明实际回答。
Compare quid facit? with rogō quid faciat. The embedded question is not an accusative-and-infinitive statement. Other moods are available for deliberative or potential direct questions.比较 quid facit? 与 rogō quid faciat。嵌入的问题不是宾格加不定式陈述。商议或可能性直接问句可用其他语气。
τί ποιεῖ ὁ στρατηγός;
The semicolon-shaped sign is the Greek question mark. τί is interrogative; the unaccented enclitic τι is indefinite. An information question differs from a question asked mainly for rhetorical effect.形似分号的符号是希腊问号。τί 是疑问词；无重音的附着词 τι 是不定词。询问信息与主要用于修辞效果的问题不同。
After present ἐρωτᾷ, an indirect question can retain the indicative. After a past reporting verb, Greek may retain the original mood or use an optative; it does not follow the Latin rule mechanically.现在时 ἐρωτᾷ 后，间接问句可保留直陈式。过去报告动词后，希腊语可保留原来的语气，也可用祈愿式；不能机械套用拉丁语规则。
This is an authored example; other answers may preserve the intended meaning and fit the context.此为编写示例；其他答案也可能保留预期意义，并符合语境。
Change one choice, then connect the choices改变一项选择，再把选择连接起来
Variation 1变化练习 1
Ask neutrally whether the soldiers are guarding the gate.不预设回答，询问士兵们是否在守卫城门。
Show a hint查看提示
Attach -ne to the verb.把 -ne 附在动词后。
Use ἆρα with an indicative question.用 ἆρα 引入直陈式问句。
Compare with one possible answer与一种可能的答案比较
Custōdiuntne mīlitēs portam?
-ne marks a question without itself requiring a yes or no response. The verb remains indicative.-ne 标示问题，本身不要求肯定或否定回答。动词仍用直陈式。
ἆρα φυλάττουσιν οἱ στρατιῶται τὴν πύλην;
ἆρα introduces the inquiry. The soldiers remain the subject and the gate the object; no tense change is needed.ἆρα 引入询问。士兵仍为主语，城门仍为宾语，无须改变时态。
Variation 2变化练习 2
The messenger asks what the soldiers are doing.信使询问士兵们正在做什么。
Show a hint查看提示
Use a present subjunctive in the embedded question.嵌入的问题用现在时虚拟式。
Keep the present indicative after present ἐρωτᾷ.现在时 ἐρωτᾷ 后保留现在时直陈式。
Compare with one possible answer与一种可能的答案比较
Nūntius rogat quid mīlitēs faciant.
Faciant marks a dependent question; quid remains its object. The question is simultaneous with the asking.Faciant 标示从属问句；quid 仍为它的宾语。所问动作与询问同时。
ὁ ἄγγελος ἐρωτᾷ τί ποιοῦσιν οἱ στρατιῶται.
Ποιοῦσιν retains the mood and tense of τί ποιοῦσιν; this is a question embedded under ἐρωτᾷ, not a quoted direct question.Ποιοῦσιν 保留 τί ποιοῦσιν; 的语气和时态；这里是 ἐρωτᾷ 下嵌入的问题，不是直接问句引语。
Variation 3变化练习 3
Ask why the general remained.询问将军为何留下。
Show a hint查看提示
Use cūr and a perfect indicative.用 cūr 与完成时直陈式。
Use διὰ τί and the aorist of μένω.用 διὰ τί 与 μένω 的不定过去时。
Compare with one possible answer与一种可能的答案比较
Cūr dux mānsit?
The question asks for a reason for a past event. Cūr is interrogative; it does not itself introduce a causal explanation.该问题询问过去事件的原因。Cūr 是疑问词，本身不引入因果解释。
διὰ τί ἔμεινεν ὁ στρατηγός;
Διὰ τί asks why. Ἔμεινεν presents the past occurrence; a reply explaining its reason belongs to the causal lesson.Διὰ τί 询问为什么。Ἔμεινεν 呈现过去发生的事件；解释原因的回答属于因果一课。
Woodcock §169 — A factual direct question can use the indicative.事实性直接问句可用直陈式。
Woodcock §170 — Question particles can signal the answer the speaker presumes.疑问小词可标示说话者预设的回答。
Woodcock §178 — A dependent factual question normally takes the subjunctive in classical Latin.古典拉丁语的从属事实问句通常用虚拟式。
Smyth §2642 — Information questions can begin with an interrogative pronoun or adverb.询问信息的问句可由疑问代词或副词引入。
Smyth §2650 — ἆρα can introduce a question without presuming yes or no.ἆρα 可引入不预设肯定或否定回答的问题。
Smyth §2677 — Primary-tense indirect questions retain the original mood and tense; historical contexts can permit the optative.主要时态后的间接问句保留原来的语气和时态；历史时态语境可用祈愿式。
Original examples and explanations remain drafts pending independent language review.编写例答及解释仍为草案，等待独立语言审阅。
Keep or analyse a response elsewhere保存作答或送往其他工作区分析
Choose one response to export as a Syntax Studio source. Only that text is included; reflections and model answers stay outside this export. Import and a composition fork remain explicit actions in Cursus.选择一项作答，导出为 Syntax Studio 的源文本。只包含所选文本，不含反思或例答。在 Cursus 中，导入及建立写作分支仍须明确操作。