TRIAL · 诉讼
Quintus Roscius · civil dispute昆图斯·罗斯基乌斯 · 民事争议
Date uncertain年份不详Defence advocate辩护人Outcome not recorded结局未见记载
Q. Roscius Gallus昆图斯·罗斯基乌斯
How to assess this result如何评估此结果 magalia’s description本站描述
The surviving argument concerns accounts and financial liability. No verdict is recorded.传世论证关涉账簿与金钱责任；判决未见记载。
The speech gives no year, and dates of 76, 68 and 66 BC have been proposed; Alexander places the trial between 76 and 68 (Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC, no. 166). The list of speeches files it under 76.演说未记年份，前人有公元前76、68、66年三说；Alexander 定此案于前76至前68年之间（Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC，第166号）。演说编年将其列于前76年。
What this establishes about precedent判例问题：证据能说明什么
No adopted general rule established by the assembled evidence.现有证据未能确立法庭采纳了一般规则。
Evidence and its surroundings证据及其上下文
Accounts and a civil dispute: no recorded outcome账簿与民事争议：结局未见记载
Before the selection选段之前
The opening is fragmentary; a gap marker is preserved in the preceding unit. The issue is documentary proof of a monetary claim.开篇残缺，上文保留缺文标记；此处争点是金钱请求的文书证明。
Read the preceding original context阅读前文原文 (1)
1[…: gap in edition] malitiam naturae crederetur. is scilicet vir optimus et singulari fide praeditus in suo iudicio suis tabulis testibus uti conatur. solent fere dicere qui per tabulas hominis honesti pecuniam expensam tulerunt: egone talem virum corrumpere potui, ut mea causa falsum in codicem referret? exspecto quam mox Chaerea hac oratione utatur: egone hanc manum plenam perfidiae et hos digitos meos impellere potui ut falsum perscriberent nomen? quod si ille suas proferet tabulas, proferet suas quoque Roscius. erit in illius tabulis hoc nomen, at ⟨in⟩ huius non erit.Source unit XML · 来源单元Selected original passage所选原文
2cur potius illius quam huius credetur?— scripsisset ille, si non iussu huius expensum tulisset? —non scripsisset hic quod sibi expensum ferre iussisset? nam quem ad modum turpe est scribere quod non debeatur, sic improbum est non referre quod debeas. aeque enim tabulae condemnantur eius qui verum non rettulit et eius qui falsum perscripsit. sed ego copia et facultate causae confisus vide quo progrediar. si tabulas C. Fannius accepti et expensi profert suas in suam rem suo arbitratu scriptas, quo minus secundum illum iudicetis non recuso.Source unit XML · 来源单元Also in · 亦见: Cicero's orations · 西塞罗演说集 text · 原文
Editorial summary编辑摘要
Cicero challenges the accounting evidence and states what he would concede if Fannius produced the specified books.西塞罗质疑账目证据，并说明若范尼乌斯提交特定账簿，自己将如何让步。
After the selection选段之后
The following argument continues the scrutiny of accounts. A surviving speech establishes advocacy and argument, but need not supply a verdict.下文继续审查账簿。演说传世足以证明辩护及其论点，却未必提供判决。
Read the following original context阅读后文原文 (1)
3quis hoc frater fratri, quis parens filio tribuit ut, quodcumque rettulisset, id ratum haberet? ratum habebit Roscius; profer; quod tibi fuerit persuasum, huic erit persuasum, quod tibi fuerit probatum, huic erit probatum. Paulo ante M. Perpennae, P. Saturi tabulas poscebamus, nunc tuas, C. Fanni Chaerea, solius flagitamus et quo minus secundum eas lis detur non recusamus; quid ita non profers?Source unit XML · 来源单元The passage argues over the accounts and reports no verdict; the outcome of the dispute is not recorded.此段论辩账目，未载判决；此案结局未见记载。
Edition, reuse and extraction版本、复用与提取
Perseus Digital Library, Tufts University; Cicero. M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes, Volume 4. Clark, Albert Curtis, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1909.
Perseus repository · 语料库 · CC BY-SA 4.0
Whitespace normalized; notes separated; deletions ⟦ ⟧ and additions/supplements ⟨ ⟩ marked; gaps explicit; no ancient wording supplied.
Continue in the builds转入关联读本
Pro Q. Roscio Comoedo · the speech演说原文The cases Cicero took西塞罗所任讼案Cicero’s life through its sources循史料读西塞罗生平Corpus & Law演说与法律Cicero’s ancient readers西塞罗的古代读者