Provenance. §1 = reviewed unit (candidate gold, Watson-grounded; inter-annotator agreement is an LLM-panel proxy for human IAA). §§2–3 = candidate (proxy IAA, not human-calibrated). §§4–73 = machine-assisted, unreviewed heuristic exploration. Interpretive layers are valid-but-heuristic rule-sets — coverage ≠ accuracy, not a digital edition. Editorial statement · Error budget

Editorial Statement (ratio edendi)

Cicero, Divinatio in Q. Caecilium · urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi004 · 73 §§, 6903 tokens.

Base text: cicero-reader phi004.json (Perseus phi0474.phi004-lat2). Tokenizer: deterministic, reproducible (GATE 7). Tagset: frozen coarse v1.2 (GATE 5).

Interpretive layers. valid-but-heuristic: the semantic/pragmatic/rhetoric/move layers are transparent RULE-SETS, not learned models (GATE 6). Coverage measures analysis, not accuracy.

Constitutio scope. §1 = reviewed unit (candidate gold + 26 Watson-model corrections + §§1-3 IAA pass). §§2-3 = candidate (agent-panel IAA consensus). §§4-73 = machine-assisted, unreviewed heuristic exploration.

IAA caveat (load-bearing). Inter-annotator agreement was produced by a panel of LLM specialist agents that SHARED the Watson commentary and a common base model; it is a PROXY for human IAA (errors may correlate). A human / Watson-blind calibration is REQUIRED before any 'edition' claim. See CALIBRATION-PROTOCOL.md.

Human calibration on file: False — until true, no section may be branded an edition.

Sigla

multidimQualitysiglumrespcertgloss
seeded-gold[G]#human-source-alignedhighgold, source-aligned (§1)
watson-reviewed[R]#panel-watsonhighreviewed against Watson 2025
watson-enriched[E]#panel-watsonmediumenriched, Watson-grounded
watson-contested[C]#panel-watsonlowcontested — editors disagree
seeded[s]#machine-seedlowmachine seed, §1 only
heuristic#machineunknownmachine-assisted, unreviewed
watson-fullfix[F]#machine-rulelowdeterministic corpus rule-fix (not human gold)

Defensible citation

Divinatio Wave Lab (build ): a reviewed proof-of-concept annotation of Cicero, Divinatio in Q. Caecilium §1, with a transparent machine-assisted heuristic scaffold and an open review queue over §§2-73. A methods/tooling/data contribution, NOT a digital critical edition.

Cite this (the brand travels with the quotation)

§1 (reviewed unit)
Divinatio Wave Lab (build 2026-06-23T04:00:00Z). Cicero, Divinatio in Q. Caecilium §1 — reviewed unit (candidate gold; 26 Watson-model corrections; agent-panel inter-annotator agreement, a PROXY for human IAA). Accessed [date].
§§2-3 (candidate)
Divinatio Wave Lab (build 2026-06-23T04:00:00Z). Cicero, Div. Caec. §§2-3 — candidate annotation; agent-panel IAA consensus (a proxy for human IAA; not human-calibrated). NOT a critical edition. Accessed [date].
§§4-73 (machine-assisted exploration)
Divinatio Wave Lab (build 2026-06-23T04:00:00Z). Cicero, Div. Caec. §§N — machine-assisted, unreviewed heuristic exploration; transparent rule-sets, no human review. NOT a critical edition. Accessed [date].

NOT defensible

Versioned by build_provenance.json. Gates applied: 0 honesty, 1 rhetoric-provenance, 2 punctuation, 3 scope-labels, 4 pipeline+orchestrator, 5 IAA §§1-3, 6 layer-validity, 7 scaling, 8 publishability.