Analyze an ending分析结尾
Analyze Latin syllables, compare candidate endings and return the result to the reader.分析拉丁文音节，比较句末节奏候选，再将结果带回读本。
CICERO READING COURSE · CLAUSULAE西塞罗阅读课 · 句末节奏
How an argument comes to a close论证如何收束
Read the endings of the Divinatio alongside their wording, syntax and argumentative setting. The research brings published rhythmic discussions into the same reading path as the speech and Wavelab.将《预审篇》的结尾措辞、句法与论证语境并读，把学者关于节奏的讨论接入演说读本与 Wavelab。
Read the examples阅读例证
Five textual discussions in the Divinatio: §§4, 35, 45, 54 and 65.《预审篇》五处文字讨论：第4、35、45、54、65节。
Explore in Wavelab进入 Wavelab
Follow the same section through word position and syntactic context.在同一节追踪词序与句法语境。
Connect through Cicero World连接西塞罗世界
Read across the course, speech readers and shared research resources.贯通课程、演说读本与共享研究资料。
Rhythm begins with a textual decision节奏分析始于文字判断
A clausula is the rhythmic close of a clause or period. Here the question is how syllable quantity, word arrangement and closure interact with Cicero’s argument. Punctuation supplies starting candidates; it does not by itself establish the rhetorical boundaries.Clausula 指分句或句段的节奏性收束。这里考察音节长短、词语排列与收束位置如何同西塞罗的论证配合。标点提供初步候选位置，但不能单凭标点确定修辞边界。
The full 73-section text is available for investigation. Published examples and a review sample support development; comprehensive automatic scansion still needs validation.研究材料覆盖全篇73节。已发表例证与复核样本为工具开发提供基础；全篇自动音步分析尚待验证。
Keep your place across the builds在各工具间保持阅读位置
Five places where wording matters五处措辞影响节奏的讨论
Zieliński’s discussions on printed page 192 compare transmitted wording and proposed alternatives. These are textual questions for rhythmic analysis; no scansion is supplied for these five cases.齐林斯基在原书第192页比较传本文字与拟议异文。这五例提出的是节奏分析所涉及的文字问题，此处不附音步判定。
Divinatio §4
in Sicilia provincia fuissetZielinski compares several wordings and tentatively proposes in pr. illa. Peterson has in eadem provincia post me quaestorem fuisset, so this is not an exact-text scansion test.齐林斯基比较数种措辞，并试探性地提出 in pr. illa。彼得森本作 in eadem provincia post me quaestorem fuisset；两者文字不同，不能直接作为同一文本的节律校验。
Alternatives discussed: 所论异文：in sua pr. · eadem pr. · illa pr. · in prov. · in pr. illa
Latin context拉丁文上下文
tuli graviter et acerbe, iudices, in eum me locum adduci ut aut eos homines spes falleret qui opem a me atque auxilium petissent, aut ego, qui me ad defendendos homines ab ineunte adulescentia dedissem, tempore atque officio coactus ad accusandum traducerer. dicebam habere eos actorem Q. Caecilium, qui praesertim quaestor in eadem provincia post me quaestorem fuisset. quo ego adiumento sperabam hanc a me posse molestiam demoveri, id mihi erat adversarium maxime; nam illi multo mihi hoc facilius remisissent si istum non nossent, aut si iste apud eos quaestor non fuisset.
Divinatio §35
inter meam et tuam accusationemThe contrast between the two prosecutors becomes a test of conjunction and word arrangement. Zielinski prefers tuamque; the base text also has meam tuamque accusationem. Agreement of wording does not validate the whole historical classification scheme.两名控告者的对比涉及连词和语序的选择。齐林斯基倾向于 tuamque；底本文字同样为 meam tuamque accusationem。措辞相合不等于其整套历史分类已获验证。
Alternatives discussed: 所论异文：tuamque acc.
Latin context拉丁文上下文
ac vide quantum interfuturum sit inter meam tuamque accusationem. ego etiam quae tu sine Verre commisisti Verri crimini daturus sum, quod te non prohibuerit, cum summam ipse haberet potestatem: tu contra ne quae ille quidem fecit obicies, ne qua ex parte coniunctus cum eo reperiare. quid? illa, Caecili, contemnendane tibi videntur esse, sine quibus causa sustineri, praesertim tanta, nullo modo potest? aliqua facultas agendi, aliqua dicendi consuetudo, aliqua in foro, iudiciis, legibus aut ratio aut exercitatio?
Divinatio §45
innocenti periculum facessierisThe ending closes Cicero’s imagined account of Caecilius being outmaneuvered into fearing he is endangering an innocent man. The competing verb forms alter the rhythmic material; retain them as textual alternatives.句尾收束西塞罗设想的局面：凯基利乌斯被对手逼得开始害怕自己正在使无辜者陷入危险。不同动词形式改变节律材料，须作为异文保留。
Alternatives discussed: 所论异文：facesseris · facessiveris
Latin context拉丁文上下文
te vero, Caecili, quem ad modum sit elusurus, quam omni ratione iactaturus, videre iam videor; quotiens ille tibi potestatem optionemque facturus sit ut eligas utrum velis—factum esse necne, verum esse an falsum—utrum dixeris, id contra te futurum. qui tibi aestus, qui error, quae tenebrae, di immortales, erunt, homini minime malo! quid? cum accusationis tuae membra dividere coeperit et in digitis suis singulas partis causae constituere? quid? cum unum quidque transigere, expedire, absolvere? ipse profecto metuere incipies ne innocenti periculum facessieris.
Divinatio §54
actorem causae totius adoptavitThe close presents the province as the accuser acting through its chosen representative. Zielinski suggests tota adoptavit; the entry ends with Nicht aufgenommen (not included). Preserve that qualification and do not replace totius in the base edition.此处将行省写成经由其选定代表而行动的控告者。齐林斯基提出 tota adoptavit；该条末尾标注 Nicht aufgenommen（未收入）。须保留这一限定，不得据此改写底本的 totius。
Alternatives discussed: 所论异文：tota adoptavit
Latin context拉丁文上下文
quodsi ei potissimum censes permitti oportere accusandi potestatem cui maximam C. Verres iniuriam fecerit, utrum tandem censes hos iudices gravius ferre oportere, te ab illo esse laesum, an provinciam Siciliam esse vexatam ac perditam? opinor, concedes multo hoc et esse gravius et ab omnibus ferri gravius oportere. concede igitur ut tibi anteponatur in accusando provincia; nam provincia accusat cum is agit causam quem sibi illa defensorem sui iuris, ultorem iniuriarum, actorem causae totius adoptavit.
Divinatio §65
potissimum esse volueruntThe ending concludes the argument that the allies’ chosen defender should act for the law and court. Zielinski reports a conjectural change of mood; the base edition keeps voluerunt. Textual and grammatical consequences must accompany any rhythm comparison.句尾结束一项论证：盟友选定的辩护人应充当法律与法庭的代理者。齐林斯基记述了改变语气的校勘提议；底本仍作 voluerunt。节律比较须同时交代文字与语法的后果。
Alternatives discussed: 所论异文：voluerint
Latin context拉丁文上下文
etenim cum lex ipsa de pecuniis repetundis sociorum atque amicorum populi Romani patrona sit, iniquum est non eum legis iudicique actorem idoneum maxime putari quem actorem causae suae socii defensoremque fortunarum suarum potissimum esse voluerunt. an quod ad commemorandum est honestius, id ad probandum non multo videri debet aequius? Vtra igitur est splendidior, utra inlustrior commemoratio, accusavi eum cui quaestor fueram, quicum me sors consuetudoque maiorum, quicum me deorum hominumque iudicium coniunxerat, an accusavi rogatu sociorum atque amicorum, delectus sum ab universa provincia qui eius iura fortunasque defenderem? dubitare quisquam potest quin honestius sit eorum causa apud quos quaestor fueris, quam eum cuius quaestor fueris accusare?