Provenance. §1 = reviewed unit (candidate gold, Watson-grounded). §§2–3 = candidate (agent-panel self-consistency, not human-calibrated). §§4–73 = machine-assisted, unreviewed heuristic exploration. Every agreement figure here is agent-panel self-consistency (κ_agent) — a same-base-model proxy CONTROL, NOT human inter-annotator agreement. No human has annotated: humanCalibrationOnFile = false. On unseen text the hardest tier is weak (macro full-tag κ_agent = 0.57, §§2–3). Interpretive layers are valid-but-heuristic rule-sets — coverage ≠ accuracy, not a digital edition. Editorial statement · Error budget

Cicero Wave Lab · Divinatio

A word’s many positions

Drag through Cicero’s speech: each word carries a linear speech position, plus clause-contour, phrase-role, and morphology readings. Syntactic gold is §1 only (57 content tokens); for §§2–73 the clause / phrase / construction waves read “not yet analysed.” Only the linear speech-position layer is a true metric across the whole speech.

Full Speech Map

word 0

gold same clause contour same phrase role anchor

What does this word know about where it is?