Cicero · Corpus & Law · 10 September 2026

Legal texts & instruments
Evidence dossiers

Existence, chronology, legal operation, documentary survival, and contested reconstruction—read with ancient witnesses and local critical editions.

50instrument dossiers
250annotated research units
14additional bilingual witnesses

All 50 instruments in the existing curated register; not every enactment mentioned anywhere in Cicero.

Chinese working translations; no independent second-translator review. Existing evidence translates only its marked focus. New witness cards state their translation scope.

Interactive atlas · Research data · Claim ledger · Audit

50 dossiers

edict · Attested use: before 81 BCE

Praetorian edict invoked under P. Burrienus

布里恩努斯所援用的裁判官告示

须分别考察告示规定、财产占有是否合规,以及多拉贝拉命令订立的诉讼赌约;不能由占有主张直接推出债务成立。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Quinctio 30 expressly names the edict of P. Burrienus inside the condition of the sponsio; §60 reports the edictal ground concerning an absent person not defended as required. These attest a rule invoked in a real dispute, through the defendant’s advocate.

LR-burrienus-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

The secure bound is application before the hearing of 81 BCE. The narrated possession and later order are successive events, not dates of first promulgation. Neither passage supplies a consular year for creation of this clause.

LR-burrienus-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

Naevius seeks security on the footing that goods have been possessed under the edict for thirty days. Cicero contests whether possession satisfied the edict at all. Default, adequate representation, possession and eventual sale must therefore be examined separately; the underlying partnership debt is not itself decided by this preliminary question.

LR-burrienus-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

No independent edict tablet is identified in this dossier. The operative condition survives inside Cicero’s account of Dolabella’s procedural order; §60 supplies another part of the edictal framework.

LR-burrienus-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Greenidge reconstructs the sequence from an advocate’s incomplete narrative. It does not license treating Naevius’ claim to possess as a proved lawful execution. Compare the separate Dolabella record for the individual order.

LR-burrienus-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro P. Quinctio §30

Cicero: archived Latin

venit Romam Quinctius, vadimonium sistit. iste, homo acerrimus, bonorum possessor, expulsor, ereptor, annum et sex mensis nihil petit, quiescit, condicionibus hunc quoad potest producit, a Cn. Dolabella denique praetore postulat ut sibi Quinctius iudicatum solvi satis det ex formula: quod ab eo petat quoivs ex edicto praetoris bona dies xxx possessa sint. non recusabat Quinctius quin ita satis dare iuberetur, si bona possessa essent ex edicto. decernit— quam aequum, nihil dico, unum hoc dico, novum; et hoc ipsum tacuisse mallem, quoniam utrumque quivis intellegere potuit—sed iubet P. Quinctium sponsionem cum Sex. Naevio facere: si bona sua ex edicto P. Burrieni praetoris dies xxx possessa non essent. recusabant qui aderant tum Quinctio, demonstrabant de re iudicium fieri oportere ut aut uterque inter se aut neuter satis daret; non necesse esse famam alterius in iudicium venire.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

如果他的财产并未依裁判官普布利乌斯·布里恩努斯的告示被占有三十日。
Source edition ↗
Pro P. Quinctio §60

Cicero: archived Latin

docui quod primum pollicitus sum, C. Aquili, causam omnino cur postularet non fuisse, quod neque pecunia debebatur et, si maxime deberetur, commissum nihil esset qua re ad istam rationem perveniretur. attende nunc ex edicto praetoris bona P. Quincti possideri nullo modo potuisse. recita edictum. qui fraudationis causa latitarit. non est is Quinctius; nisi si latitant qui ad negotium suum relicto procuratore proficiscuntur. cui heres non exstabit. ne is quidem. qui exsili causa solum verterit. [LACUNA] quo tempore existimas oportuisse, Naevi, absentem Quinctium defendi aut quo modo? tum cum postulabas ut bona possideres? nemo adfuit; neque enim quisquam divinare poterat te postulaturum, neque quemquam attinebat id recusare quod praetor non fieri, sed ex edicto suo fieri iubebat.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

因实施欺诈而隐匿的人。
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

edict · Introduced: 76 BCE

Lucullus’ edict on damage by armed or assembled households

卢库卢斯关于武装或集结奴仆致损的告示

卢库卢斯的告示提供加重的私人损害救济;告示创设年代与《为图利乌斯辩护》的审理年代是两个事件。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Tullio 7–12 names M. Lucullus and explains his response to violent acts by armed or assembled slave households. The speech reports the formula’s terms and the reason for a more severe remedy than ordinary wrongful-damage litigation.

LR-lucullus-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

76 BCE is the conventional date of Lucullus’ praetorship and introduction of the remedy; the later Tullius hearing, conventionally 72 or 71, proves subsequent application. The speech’s retrospective narrative does not give an exact day of issue.

LR-lucullus-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The action makes damage inflicted with malicious intent by an armed or assembled household the decisive question and seeks a fourfold assessment. Cicero uses the special wording to narrow permissible defences. This is a private penal remedy; it is not the later public prosecution under the Plautian or Pompeian violence laws.

LR-lucullus-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The edict is reconstructed from forensic quotations and commentary, not a surviving posted original. Preserve the wording quoted in the speech instead of presenting an expanded modern edict reconstruction as authentic text.

LR-lucullus-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

The relation to the Aquilian action and later robbery remedies requires historical reconstruction. A shared concern with violence is not identity of action, formula or penalty.

LR-lucullus-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro M. Tullio §7

Cicero: archived Latin

iudicium vestrum est, recuperatores, Qvantae pecvniae paret dolo malo familiae P. Fabi vi hominibvs armatis coactisve damnvm datvm esse M. Tvllio. eius rei taxationem nos fecimus; aestimatio vestra est; iudicium datum est in quadruplum.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

所授予的诉讼救济为四倍赔偿。
Source edition ↗
Pro M. Tullio §12

Cicero: archived Latin

ipsi statuerent quo tempore possent suo iure arma capere, manum cogere, homines occidere. Cum iudicium ita daret ut hoc solum in iudicium veniret, videreturne vi hominibus coactis armatisve damnum dolo malo familiae datum, neque illud adderet inivria, putavit se audaciam improborum sustulisse, cum spem defensionis nullam reliquisset.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

而没有添入“违法地”这个词
Source edition ↗
Pro M. Tullio §7

Contemporary forensic or political testimony · Cicero, first century BCE; see the speech date in the atlas

The formula’s reported words and the fourfold remedy are contemporary evidence. They should not be expanded into a reconstructed complete edict without labelling that reconstruction.

iudicium vestrum est, recuperatores, Qvantae pecvniae paret dolo malo familiae P. Fabi vi hominibvs armatis coactisve damnvm datvm esse M. Tvllio. eius rei taxationem nos fecimus; aestimatio vestra est; iudicium datum est in quadruplum.

Latin · Complete section printed here; editorial supplements retained

追偿审判员们,你们所审理的问题是:“查明马尔库斯·图利乌斯因普布利乌斯·法比乌斯奴仆集团的恶意,以武装或集结人员施暴而蒙受多少金钱的损害。”我们已经就此提出估价;具体评定由你们作出;授予的诉讼救济为四倍赔偿。

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

interdict · Origin: Republican; exact date unknown

Interdict de vi hominibus armatis

关于武装暴力驱逐的禁令

武装驱逐禁令的适用争议集中于阻止进入是否也构成驱逐;占有救济并不等于所有权判决。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Caecina 23 reports the command associated with armed expulsion; §§31–35 make its wording the object of argument. This is direct evidence for the interdict used in the dispute, mediated by Cicero’s defence.

LR-armed-interdict-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

The remedy existed before the Caecina hearing, usually placed around 69 BCE. That hearing cannot establish the first creation of the general interdict; the particular order was issued earlier in this dispute.

LR-armed-interdict-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The central dispute concerns whether preventing entry by armed force counts as the expulsion contemplated by the command. Cicero argues that a narrowly literal reading would reward intimidation. Restoration of possession and the wager enforcing the order must be distinguished from an adjudication of ownership.

LR-armed-interdict-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The dossier preserves a Ciceronian witness to an interdict, not an independently surviving praetorian album. The later juristic taxonomy is useful comparison but cannot silently replace the Republican wording.

LR-armed-interdict-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

The breadth of the remedy, the role of previous possession and the procedural reconstruction are contested. Cicero’s purposive argument is a litigant’s interpretation, not a neutral judicial holding.

LR-armed-interdict-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro A. Caecina §23

Cicero: archived Latin

his rebus ita gestis P. Dolabella praetor interdixit, ut est consuetudo, de vi hominibvs ar matis sine ulla exceptione, tantum ut unde deiecisset restitueret. restituisse se dixit. ⟨sponsio facta est. hac de⟩ sponsione vobis iudicandum est. maxime fuit optandum Caecinae, recuperatores, ut controversiae nihil haberet, secundo loco ut ne cum tam improbo homine, tertio ut cum tam stulto haberet. etenim non minus nos stultitia illius sublevat quam laedit improbitas. improbus fuit, quod homines coegit, armavit, coactis armatisque vim fecit. laesit in eo Caecinam, sublevat ibidem; nam in eas ipsas res quas improbissime fecit testimonia sumpsit et eis in causa testimoniis utitur.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

裁判官普布利乌斯·多拉贝拉依惯例就武装人员施暴颁发禁令,不附任何抗辩例外,只要求将被驱逐者恢复到原处。
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Enactment: 3rd century BCE; disputed

Lex Aquilia de damno

阿奎利乌斯损害法

《阿奎利亚法》的平民决议性质有法学家明文说明;精确颁布年与原始条文均须保留争议,后世解释不能冒充原文。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Tullio 9 explicitly names the Aquilian law. Ulpian, Digest 9.2.1.1, expressly identifies it as a plebiscite proposed by the tribune Aquilius. Gaius 3.210 and 3.215–218 distinguishes its chapters.

LR-aquilia-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

Do not turn the often repeated 287/286 BCE date into a certainty. Rotondi records competing chronologies and the problematic dependence on Theophilus; Crawford argues for an early third-century setting but separates this inference from the surviving juristic testimony.

LR-aquilia-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

Chapter one concerns killing another’s slave or herd animal and a valuation over the previous year; chapter three concerns other damaging acts and a thirty-day valuation. Chapter two concerns fraudulent release by an adstipulator. Juristic interpretation and extensions of liability are part of its history, not automatically its original enactment.

LR-aquilia-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

No original inscribed text is used here. Digest 9.2 quotes and interprets clauses centuries later. Crawford’s reconstructed text, including disputed wording and tense, is explicitly conjectural; it must not be displayed as a verbatim ancient tablet.

LR-aquilia-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

In Roscio Comoedo, the Panurgus transaction is reconstructed as Aquilian litigation; this is different from Cicero expressly naming the law there. The edict in Tullio offers a distinct penal action.

LR-aquilia-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro M. Tullio §9

Cicero: archived Latin

et cum sciret de damno legem esse Aquiliam, tamen hoc ita existimavit, apud maiores nostros cum et res et cupiditates minores essent et familiae non magnae magno metu continerentur ut perraro fieret ut homo occideretur, idque nefarium ac singulare facinus putaretur, nihil opus fuisse iudicio de vi coactis armatisque hominibus; quod enim usu non veniebat, de eo si quis legem aut iudicium constitueret, non tam prohibere videretur quam admonere.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

虽然他知道关于损害已有阿奎利乌斯法
Source edition ↗
Pro Q. Roscio Comoedo §32

Cicero: archived Latin

quae deinde sunt consecuta? Panurgum, inquit, hunc servum communem, Q. Flavius Tarquiniensis quidam interfecit. in hanc rem, inquit, me cognitorem dedisti. lite contestata, iudicio damni iniuria constituto tu sine me cum Flavio decidisti. Vtrum pro dimidia parte an pro ⟨re⟩ tota? planius dicam: utrum pro me an et pro me et pro te? pro me; potui exemplo multorum; licitum est; iure fecerunt multi; nihil in ea re tibi iniuriae feci. pete tu tuum, exige et aufer quod debetur; suam quisque partem iuris possideat et persequatur.—at enim tu tuum negotium gessisti bene.—gere et tu tuum bene.—Magno ⟨tu⟩ tuam dimidiam partem decidisti.—Magno et tu tuam partem decide. —HS Q. tu abstulisti.—sit ita hoc, vero HS Q. tu aufer.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

在争讼已经确定、违法致损的审判已经设立以后,你却未同我商议便与弗拉维乌斯和解。
Source edition ↗
Ulpian, Ad edictum 18, preserved in Digest 9.2.1.1

Later ancient testimony · Ulpian, early third century CE; Digest compiled 533 CE

Explicit testimony to legal form and proposer; no enactment year is stated. The Digest’s compilation in 533 CE is not the law’s creation date.

Quae lex Aquilia plebiscitum est, cum eam Aquilius tribunus plebis a plebe rogaverit.

Latin · Entire bounded excerpt printed here

这部《阿奎利亚法》是一项平民决议,因为它是由保民官阿奎利乌斯向平民提出并请求通过的。

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 81 BCE

Lex Cornelia de sicariis et veneficis

科尔内利乌斯刺杀与毒杀法

必须区分毒杀条款与枉致死罪的条款;特定条款的身份限制不能变成骑士普遍不负杀人责任。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Cluentio 148–154 quotes and analyses portions of the Cornelian criminal statute. These are exceptionally important contemporary witnesses because the defence turns on which persons and conduct the clauses reach.

LR-cornelia-sicariis-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

81 BCE is the conventional date within Sulla’s criminal-law settlement. The Cluentius speech of 66 attests later use, not enactment. Roscius’ trial in 80 belongs to the reconstructed early Sullan court framework.

LR-cornelia-sicariis-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

Separate poisoning liability from the clause about procuring an unjust capital condemnation. Cicero’s argument about senatorial status addresses the scope of a particular clause, not a general immunity of equestrians from murder law. Later Digest 48.8 and Collatio testimony describes a much developed body of law.

LR-cornelia-sicariis-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Contemporary forensic quotation is supplemented by imperial jurists; no complete Republican statute survives in this dossier. Later rules on punishment and newly assimilated offences must be dated to their own witnesses.

LR-cornelia-sicariis-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Do not assign the later Pompeian parricide statute to Roscius’ trial. Nor does an advocate’s exclusionary reading establish that the court accepted every part of it.

LR-cornelia-sicariis-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro A. Cluentio §148

Cicero: archived Latin

si quis apud me, T.Titi Atti, te reum velit facere, clames te lege pecuniarum repetundarum non teneri; neque haec tua recusatio confessio sit captae pecuniae sed laboris et periculi non legitimi declinatio. nunc quid agatur et quid abs te iuris constituatur vide. iubet lex ea, qua lege haec quaestio constituta est, iudicem quaestionis, hoc est Q.Quintum Voconium, cum eis iudicibus qui ei obvenerint — vos appellat, iudices — quaerere de veneno. in quem quaerere? infinitum est. quicumque fecerit, vendiderit, emerit, habuerit, dederit. quid eadem lex statim adiungit? recita. deque eius capite quaerito. cuius? qui coierit, convenerit? non ita est. quid ergo est? dic. qui tribunus militum legionibus quattuor primis, quive quaestor, tribunus plebis — deinceps omnis magistratus nominavit — quive in senatu sententiam dixit, dixerit. quid tum? qui eorum coiit, coierit, convenit, convenerit quo quis iudicio publico condemnaretur. qui eorum? quorum? videlicet qui supra scripti sunt. quid intersit utro modo scriptum sit, etsi est apertum, ipsa tamen lex nos docet. Vbi enim omnis mortalis adligat, ita loquitur: qui venenum malum fecit, fecerit. omnes viri, mulieres, liberi, servi in iudicium vocantur. si idem de coitione voluisset, adiunxisset: quive coierit. nunc ita est: qeque eius capite quaerito qui magistratum habuerit quive in senatu sententiam dixerit, qui eorum coiit, coierit. num is est Cluentius?

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

审理有关毒物的案件。
Source edition ↗
Pro A. Cluentio §154

Cicero: archived Latin

aut sibi ad honores petendos aetatem integram restitui oportere aut, quoniam id non posset, eam condicionem vitae quam secuti petitionem reliquissent manere. iniquum esse eos qui honorum ornamenta propter periculorum multitudinem praetermisissent populi beneficiis esse privatos, iudiciorum novorum periculis non carere. senatorem hoc queri non posse, propterea quod ea condicione proposita petere coepisset quodque permulta essent ornamenta quibus eam mitigare molestiam posset, locus, auctoritas, domi splendor, apud exteras nationes nomen et gratia, toga praetexta, sella curulis, insignia, fasces, exercitus, imperia, provinciae; quibus in rebus cum summa recte factis maiores nostri praemia tum plura peccatis pericula proposita esse voluerunt. illi non hoc recusabant ne ea lege accusarentur qua nunc habitus accusatur, quae tunc erat Sempronia, nunc est Cornelia — intellegebant enim ea lege equestrem ordinem non teneri — sed ne nova lege adligarentur laborabant.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

当时是森普罗尼乌斯法,如今是科尔内利乌斯法
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

uncertain · Sullan settlement: 82–81 BCE; identity uncertain

Proscription law: “Valeria or Cornelia”

公敌宣告法:瓦莱里乌斯法或科尔内利乌斯法

西塞罗本人明确保留“瓦莱里亚或科尔内利亚”的疑问;应把授权独裁、公布名单与财产没收的规范层次分别呈现。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Roscio Amerino 125 names alternatives, “Valerian or Cornelian,” and expressly says the speaker does not know which. The following argument addresses the categories whose property could be sold; §128 invokes a June deadline.

LR-proscription-law-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

The relevant setting is the Sullan settlement of 82–81 BCE. The June limit reported in the speech belongs to the operation of the proscription arrangements, not necessarily the date of their enactment.

LR-proscription-law-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

Cicero contests whether the elder Roscius falls within the authorized category of confiscation and whether the sale was timely. These are objections to title and administrative action used within a murder defence; the speech does not become an independent action to annul the whole Sullan settlement.

LR-proscription-law-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The strongest witness includes uncertainty in its own wording. Appian and Plutarch provide historical accounts of the dictatorship and proscriptions, but cannot erase the uncertainty in Cicero’s statutory identification.

LR-proscription-law-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Rotondi distinguishes the Valerian authorization of the dictatorship from Cornelian proscription arrangements and discusses whether the latter derived force from the former. This is an interpretive model, not a recovered complete statute.

LR-proscription-law-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro Sex. Roscio Amerino §125

Cicero: archived Latin

primum hoc videamus: eius hominis bona qua ratione venierunt aut quo modo venire potuerunt? atque hoc non ita quaeram, iudices, ut id dicam esse indignum, hominis innocentis bona venisse — si enim haec audientur ac libere dicentur, non fuit tantus homo Sex. Roscius in civitate ut de eo potissimum conqueramur — verum ego hoc quaero: qui potuerunt ista ipsa lege quae de proscriptione est, sive Valeria est sive Cornelia — non enim novi nec scio — verum ista ipsa lege bona Sex. Rosci venire qui potuerunt?

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

无论它是瓦莱里乌斯法还是科尔内利乌斯法:因为我既不熟悉,也不知道
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 81 BCE

Lex Cornelia de repetundis

科尔内利乌斯行省勒索法

《为拉比里乌斯·波斯图穆斯辩护》证明追及所得条款的承继关系;一个条款沿用不等于整部法律内容相同。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Rabirio Postumo 9 explicitly says that the recipient-recovery clause passed from the Servilian into the Cornelian and then the Julian law. The statute’s existence is thus stronger evidence than any reconstruction of its complete contents.

LR-cornelia-repetundis-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

The conventional Sullan date is 81 BCE, but Rotondi marks that dating with a question. Its place between Servilian and Julian legislation is independently supported by Cicero’s sequence; a full enactment date is not.

LR-cornelia-repetundis-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The relevant provision reaches money that passed to someone other than the convicted official. Greenidge places Verres’ and Fonteius’ trials within the Cornelian regime. Their institutional setting and the preserved recipient clause are different kinds of evidence.

LR-cornelia-repetundis-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Only fragments and references transmitted through literature are available here. The three-stage sequence in Rabirio Postumo does not show that every procedural or penal provision remained identical.

LR-cornelia-repetundis-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Avoid importing the whole of Julian or imperial repetundae law into the Sullan statute. Explicit continuity of one chapter is narrower than continuity of an entire code.

LR-cornelia-repetundis-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro C. Rabirio Postumo §9

Cicero: archived Latin

sin hoc totidem verbis translatum caput est quot fuit non modo in Cornelia sed etiam ante in lege Servilia, per deos immortalis! quid agimus, iudices, aut quem hunc morem novorum iudiciorum in rem publicam inducimus? erat enim haec consuetudo nota vobis quidem omnibus, sed, si usus magister est optimus, mihi debet esse notissima. accusavi de pecuniis repetundis, iudex sedi, praetor quaesivi, defendi plurimos; nulla pars quae aliquam facultatem discendi adferre posset a me afuit. ita contendo, neminem umquam Qvo ea pecvnia pervenisset causam dixisse qui in aestimandis litibus appellatus non esset. in litibus autem nemo appellabatur nisi ex testium dictis aut tabulis privatorum aut rationibus civitatum.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

不仅在科尔内利乌斯法中,而且更早在塞尔维利乌斯法中也有
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 59 BCE

Lex Iulia de pecuniis repetundis

尤利乌斯行省勒索法

恺撒的朱利亚勒索法与追及受领人的程序相关;应分别证明主案、款项流向和受领人的责任。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Rabirio Postumo 8–12 names the Julian law and quotes the words governing money that reached another recipient. Cicero’s contemporary correspondence and later Digest 48.11 provide further witnesses to the broad anti-extortion regime.

LR-iulia-repetundis-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

59 BCE is Caesar’s consular enactment year. The Flaccus defence later that year calls a law recent and new without naming it at §13; its identification as Julian is Greenidge’s interpretation. Rabirio Postumo in 54 gives explicit naming.

LR-iulia-repetundis-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The recipient proceeding depends on the prior official extortion case and assessment, but the defence disputes both the reach of the clause and what Postumus received. The law also belongs to the regulation of provincial office and gifts; those wider provisions need their own loci.

LR-iulia-repetundis-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

This is a statute reconstructed from multiple literary and juristic witnesses, not a surviving complete bronze. Late imperial texts under its title may preserve extensions and altered penalties.

LR-iulia-repetundis-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Do not equate every payment in a governor’s orbit with proved extortion, or every recipient with a principal defendant. Distinguish the quoted chapter from the advocate’s account of Gabinius’ conviction.

LR-iulia-repetundis-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro C. Rabirio Postumo §8

Cicero: archived Latin

quod si item a Gabinio seiunctam ostendero, certe quod dicas nihil habebis. est enim haec causa Qvo ea pecvnia pervenerit quasi quaedam appendicula causae iudicatae atque damnatae. sunt lites aestimatae A. Gabinio, nec praedes dati nec ex bonis populo universae ⟨lites solutae⟩. iubet lex Iulia persequi ab eis ad quos ea pecunia quam is ceperit qui damnatus sit pervenerit. si est hoc novum in lege Iulia, sicuti multa sunt severius scripta quam in antiquis legibus et sanctius, inducatur sane etiam consuetudo huius generis iudiciorum nova;

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

尤利乌斯法命令向那些取得该笔钱财的人追偿;那是已被判罪者曾经收取的钱财。
Source edition ↗
Pro L. Flacco §13

Cicero: archived Latin

vehementem accusatorem nacti sumus, iudices, et inimicum in omni genere odiosum ac molestum; quem spero his nervis fore magno usui et amicis et rei publicae; sed certe inflammatus incredibili cupiditate hanc causam accusationemque suscepit. qui comitatus in inquirendo! comitatum dico; immo vero quantus exercitus! quae iactura, qui sumptus, quanta largitio! quae quamquam utilia sunt causae, timide tamen dico, quod vereor ne Laelius ex his rebus quas sibi suscepit gloriae causa putet aliquid oratione mea sermonis in sese aut invidiae esse quaesitum. itaque hanc partem totam relinquam; tantum a vobis petam, iudices, ut, si quid ipsi audistis communi fama atque sermone de vi, de manu, de armis, de copiis, memineritis; quarum rerum invidia lege hac recenti ac nova certus est inquisitioni comitum numerus constitutus.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

这部新近制定的法律,已经限定调查时随行人员的数目。
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Enactment: 104 or 101 BCE; disputed

Lex Servilia de repetundis (Glaucia)

塞尔维利乌斯行省勒索法(格劳基亚)

格劳基亚的塞尔维利亚法不能与凯皮奥同姓的审判法混同;铜表归属及年代均有研究史上的分歧。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Rabirio Postumo 9 attributes the inherited recipient clause to the Servilian law. Verrines II.1.26 contrasts its two-hearing arrangement with Acilian procedure. These identify particular procedural innovations, not the full statute.

LR-servilia-repetundis-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

Glaucia’s law is conventionally assigned to 104 or 101 BCE; the exact chronology is disputed. Rotondi’s older placement around 111 differs sharply and rests on assumptions about reuse of the Bembine bronze. It is recorded as an older reconstruction, not silently adopted.

LR-servilia-repetundis-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The important comparisons concern the selection of an accuser, a repeated hearing and reaching money transferred to another recipient. The two-stage hearing could be exploited for delay in Verres’ prosecution.

LR-servilia-repetundis-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Crawford distinguishes the inscribed Gracchan repetundae law from innovations associated with Glaucia. The Tarentum fragment has been assigned to several different laws; its label cannot securely supply Glaucia’s complete text.

LR-servilia-repetundis-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Keep Glaucia’s statute distinct from Caepio’s Servilian jury legislation. A shared gentilicium does not identify proposer, date, jury composition or operative clauses.

LR-servilia-repetundis-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro C. Rabirio Postumo §9

Cicero: archived Latin

sin hoc totidem verbis translatum caput est quot fuit non modo in Cornelia sed etiam ante in lege Servilia, per deos immortalis! quid agimus, iudices, aut quem hunc morem novorum iudiciorum in rem publicam inducimus? erat enim haec consuetudo nota vobis quidem omnibus, sed, si usus magister est optimus, mihi debet esse notissima. accusavi de pecuniis repetundis, iudex sedi, praetor quaesivi, defendi plurimos; nulla pars quae aliquam facultatem discendi adferre posset a me afuit. ita contendo, neminem umquam Qvo ea pecvnia pervenisset causam dixisse qui in aestimandis litibus appellatus non esset. in litibus autem nemo appellabatur nisi ex testium dictis aut tabulis privatorum aut rationibus civitatum.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

在塞尔维利乌斯法中
Source edition ↗
In C. Verrem §2.1.26

Cicero: archived Latin

adimo enim comperendinatum: quod habet lex in se molestissimum, bis ut causa dicatur,—quod aut mea causa potius est constitutum quam tua, aut nihilo tua potius quam mea. nam si bis dicere est commodum, certe utriusque commune est; si eum qui posterius dixit opus est redargui, accusatoris causa, ut bis ageretur, constitutum est. verum, ut opinor, Glaucia primus tulit ut comperendinaretur reus; antea vel iudicari primo poterat vel amplius pronuntiari. Vtram igitur putas legem molliorem? opinor, illam veterem, qua vel cito absolvi vel tarde condemnari licebat. ego tibi illam Aciliam legem restituo, qua lege multi semel accusati, semel dicta causa, semel auditis testibus condemnati sunt, nequaquam tam manifestis neque tantis criminibus quantis tu convinceris. Puta te non hac tam atroci, sed illa lege mitissima causam dicere. accusabo; respondebis; testibus editis ita mittam in consilium ut, etiamsi lex ampliandi faciat potestatem, tamen isti turpe sibi existiment non primo iudicare.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

格劳基亚最先立法,规定被告须经历第二次审理
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Enactment disputed · Before Glaucia; exact year disputed

Lex Acilia repetundarum

阿基利乌斯行省勒索法

应把西塞罗所称《阿基利亚法》与现存追偿法铜表区分:铜表确实存在,但二者同一仍是需要论证的鉴定。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Verrines II.1.26 expressly contrasts the Acilian law with the Servilian law. The bronze repetundae statute conventionally associated with it supplies a second, documentary evidence stream, whose precise statutory identification remains debated.

LR-acilia-repetundis-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

The previous 123–122 BCE label conflated a conventional attribution with a secure date. LEPOR notice 3 favours a separate Acilian measure shortly before 111, succeeding a Sempronian law; notice 682 prefers Sempronian attribution for the bronze. Crawford dates the bronze to the Gracchan period but remains neutral about naming Acilius as proposer. The named Acilian law is securely earlier than Glaucia’s Servilian law; its exact year remains disputed.

LR-acilia-repetundis-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The bronze regulates patrons, selection of jurors, witnesses, voting, assessment, recovery and rewards. Its absence of a clear clause on presentation of the parties’ speeches matters: a detailed procedural reconstruction still has gaps.

LR-acilia-repetundis-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Documentary control: Crawford, Roman Statutes I, law 1; CIL I² 583. The reverse carries the agrarian law of 111 BCE. Fragment survival, early copies and restoration all mediate the edition. Do not call every supplemented letter a surviving letter.

LR-acilia-repetundis-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

The existence of an inscribed extortion statute is secure; equating that object with the named Acilian law is a further identification. Crawford rejects its equation with Glaucia’s law, explaining the missing characteristic innovations.

LR-acilia-repetundis-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

In C. Verrem §2.1.26

Cicero: archived Latin

adimo enim comperendinatum: quod habet lex in se molestissimum, bis ut causa dicatur,—quod aut mea causa potius est constitutum quam tua, aut nihilo tua potius quam mea. nam si bis dicere est commodum, certe utriusque commune est; si eum qui posterius dixit opus est redargui, accusatoris causa, ut bis ageretur, constitutum est. verum, ut opinor, Glaucia primus tulit ut comperendinaretur reus; antea vel iudicari primo poterat vel amplius pronuntiari. Vtram igitur putas legem molliorem? opinor, illam veterem, qua vel cito absolvi vel tarde condemnari licebat. ego tibi illam Aciliam legem restituo, qua lege multi semel accusati, semel dicta causa, semel auditis testibus condemnati sunt, nequaquam tam manifestis neque tantis criminibus quantis tu convinceris. Puta te non hac tam atroci, sed illa lege mitissima causam dicere. accusabo; respondebis; testibus editis ita mittam in consilium ut, etiamsi lex ampliandi faciat potestatem, tamen isti turpe sibi existiment non primo iudicare.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

我现在为你恢复那部阿基利乌斯法
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

provincial · Settlement · 132 or 131 BCE

Lex Rupilia

鲁皮利乌斯西西里司法规约

鲁皮利乌斯的安排应视为总督与十名委员形成的司法规定;132与131年的差别需说明,不能直接称为完整行省法典。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Verrines II.2.32 calls the arrangement a decretum of Rupilius made with ten commissioners and says the Sicilians call it the Rupilian law. §§37–44 test its operation in Heraclius’ inheritance dispute.

LR-rupilia-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

The former atlas date 132 BCE needs qualification. Rotondi dates the settlement to 131; 132 is the consulship and commonly repeated dating. Display 132–131 BCE, with the disagreement explained, not as a two-year effective term.

LR-rupilia-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The rules distinguish disputes within one city, between Sicilians of different cities, between an individual and a community, and between Roman and Sicilian parties. The method of choosing judges varies with those categories.

LR-rupilia-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

No self-contained provincial charter survives here. Cicero’s terminology itself warns against treating this as an ordinary Roman popular statute. The governor’s subsequent edict helps sustain local and inter-community rules in practice.

LR-rupilia-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Dubouloz shows why alleged injustice cannot always be reduced to a technically illegal appointment: Verres could correct formal selection while still exerting pressure. Preserve Cicero’s accusations separately from that procedural analysis.

LR-rupilia-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

In C. Verrem §2.2.32

Cicero: archived Latin

verum ut totum genus amplectamini iudiciorum, prius iura Siculorum, deinde istius instituta cognoscite. Siculi hoc iure sunt ut, quod civis cum cive agat, domi certet suis legibus, quod Siculus cum Siculo non eiusdem civitatis, ut de eo praetor iudices ex P. Rupili decreto, quod is de decem legatorum sententia statuit, quam illi legem Rupiliam vocant, sortiatur. quod privatus a populo petit aut populus a privato, senatus ex aliqua civitate qui iudicet datur, cum alternae civitates reiectae sunt; quod civis Romanus a Siculo petit, Siculus iudex, quod Siculus a civi Romano, civis Romanus datur; ceterarum rerum selecti iudices ex conventu civium Romanorum proponi solent. inter aratores et decumanos lege frumentaria, quam Hieronicam appellant, iudicia fiunt.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

依据普布利乌斯·鲁皮利乌斯经十名使节合议所定的命令:当地人称之为鲁皮利乌斯法
Source edition ↗
In C. Verrem §2.2.32

Contemporary forensic or political testimony · Cicero, first century BCE; see the speech date in the atlas

The passage directly distinguishes several jurisdictions and legal forms. Calling Rupilius’ decretum a lex is attributed to Sicilian usage; the closing sentence is a separate witness to Hieronian fiscal litigation.

verum ut totum genus amplectamini iudiciorum, prius iura Siculorum, deinde istius instituta cognoscite. Siculi hoc iure sunt ut, quod civis cum cive agat, domi certet suis legibus, quod Siculus cum Siculo non eiusdem civitatis, ut de eo praetor iudices ex P. Rupili decreto, quod is de decem legatorum sententia statuit, quam illi legem Rupiliam vocant, sortiatur. quod privatus a populo petit aut populus a privato, senatus ex aliqua civitate qui iudicet datur, cum alternae civitates reiectae sunt; quod civis Romanus a Siculo petit, Siculus iudex, quod Siculus a civi Romano, civis Romanus datur; ceterarum rerum selecti iudices ex conventu civium Romanorum proponi solent. inter aratores et decumanos lege frumentaria, quam Hieronicam appellant, iudicia fiunt.

Latin · Complete section printed here; editorial supplements retained

为了让你们把握这整类审判,请先了解西西里人的法律,再了解此人的制度。 西西里人的规则如下:同一城邦的公民之间发生诉讼,在本邦依本邦法律争讼;一个西西里人同另一个不同城邦的西西里人争讼,裁判官便依普布利乌斯·鲁皮利乌斯的决定抽签选取审判员;那是他依十名使节的意见所订立、当地人称为《鲁皮利乌斯法》的安排。私人向城邦请求,或城邦向私人请求时,双方交替排除候选城邦后,指定某一城邦的议事会审理。罗马公民向西西里人请求,指定西西里人任审判员;西西里人向罗马公民请求,指定罗马公民任审判员。其他事项,通常从罗马公民会众中公布选定的审判员。耕作者与什一税承包人之间,则依他们称为《希耶罗法》的粮食法进行审判。

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

provincial · Origin: Sicilian royal period; undated

Lex Hieronica

希耶罗西西里什一税规制

希耶罗粮税制度的王政背景、罗马沿用与韦雷斯时期实际运作须分层;建筑遗存只能辅助重建行政实践,不能代替法条。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Verrines II.3.12–15 describes the fiscal arrangement associated with Hiero and Roman retention of it; II.2.32 expressly connects disputes between cultivators and tithe contractors with the Hieronian grain law.

LR-hieronica-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

The evidence supports a royal Sicilian background before Roman incorporation, followed by later Roman use. It does not date a single act of promulgation or prove that every Republican provision originated with Hiero II.

LR-hieronica-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The system connects tithe auctions, assessment, local cultivators, contractors and dispute resolution. Verres’ alleged abuses operate through changes to these relationships and the practical availability of remedies, not simply through a different nominal tax rate.

LR-hieronica-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

No original royal code is reproduced. Bell investigates architectural and administrative traces at Morgantina as evidence for fiscal practices; archaeological association with the system is an inference, not an inscribed copy of the law.

LR-hieronica-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Separate continuity of a named institution from unchanged wording or unchanged territorial coverage. Cicero’s idealized contrast between inherited order and Verres’ conduct serves the prosecution.

LR-hieronica-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

In C. Verrem §2.2.32

Cicero: archived Latin

verum ut totum genus amplectamini iudiciorum, prius iura Siculorum, deinde istius instituta cognoscite. Siculi hoc iure sunt ut, quod civis cum cive agat, domi certet suis legibus, quod Siculus cum Siculo non eiusdem civitatis, ut de eo praetor iudices ex P. Rupili decreto, quod is de decem legatorum sententia statuit, quam illi legem Rupiliam vocant, sortiatur. quod privatus a populo petit aut populus a privato, senatus ex aliqua civitate qui iudicet datur, cum alternae civitates reiectae sunt; quod civis Romanus a Siculo petit, Siculus iudex, quod Siculus a civi Romano, civis Romanus datur; ceterarum rerum selecti iudices ex conventu civium Romanorum proponi solent. inter aratores et decumanos lege frumentaria, quam Hieronicam appellant, iudicia fiunt.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

耕作者与什一税承包人之间,依照所谓希耶罗粮税法进行审判。
Source edition ↗
In C. Verrem §2.3.15

Cicero: archived Latin

itaque decumas lege Hieronica semper vendundas censuerunt, ut iis iucundior esset muneris illius functio, si eius regis qui Siculis carissimus fuit non solum instituta commutato imperio, verum etiam nomen maneret. hoc iure ante Verrem praetorem Siculi semper usi sunt: hic primus instituta omnium, consuetudinem a maioribus traditam, condicionem amicitiae, ius societatis convellere et commutare ausus est.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

他们一贯决定,什一税的承包权应按希耶罗法出售
Source edition ↗
In C. Verrem §2.2.32

Contemporary forensic or political testimony · Cicero, first century BCE; see the speech date in the atlas

The passage directly distinguishes several jurisdictions and legal forms. Calling Rupilius’ decretum a lex is attributed to Sicilian usage; the closing sentence is a separate witness to Hieronian fiscal litigation.

verum ut totum genus amplectamini iudiciorum, prius iura Siculorum, deinde istius instituta cognoscite. Siculi hoc iure sunt ut, quod civis cum cive agat, domi certet suis legibus, quod Siculus cum Siculo non eiusdem civitatis, ut de eo praetor iudices ex P. Rupili decreto, quod is de decem legatorum sententia statuit, quam illi legem Rupiliam vocant, sortiatur. quod privatus a populo petit aut populus a privato, senatus ex aliqua civitate qui iudicet datur, cum alternae civitates reiectae sunt; quod civis Romanus a Siculo petit, Siculus iudex, quod Siculus a civi Romano, civis Romanus datur; ceterarum rerum selecti iudices ex conventu civium Romanorum proponi solent. inter aratores et decumanos lege frumentaria, quam Hieronicam appellant, iudicia fiunt.

Latin · Complete section printed here; editorial supplements retained

为了让你们把握这整类审判,请先了解西西里人的法律,再了解此人的制度。 西西里人的规则如下:同一城邦的公民之间发生诉讼,在本邦依本邦法律争讼;一个西西里人同另一个不同城邦的西西里人争讼,裁判官便依普布利乌斯·鲁皮利乌斯的决定抽签选取审判员;那是他依十名使节的意见所订立、当地人称为《鲁皮利乌斯法》的安排。私人向城邦请求,或城邦向私人请求时,双方交替排除候选城邦后,指定某一城邦的议事会审理。罗马公民向西西里人请求,指定西西里人任审判员;西西里人向罗马公民请求,指定罗马公民任审判员。其他事项,通常从罗马公民会众中公布选定的审判员。耕作者与什一税承包人之间,则依他们称为《希耶罗法》的粮食法进行审判。

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

edict · Edict issued: 74 BCE

Verres’ urban inheritance edict

维勒斯在罗马关于继承的告示

74年的城市裁判官告示因追溯影响既有遗嘱而受攻击;其与《沃科尼亚法》的关系是争议所在,不能把二者合并。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Verrines II.1.104–110 recounts the urban inheritance edict and its effect on Asellus’ daughter. Cicero contrasts Verres’ innovation with established law and the treatment of earlier wills.

LR-verres-inheritance-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

74 BCE dates Verres’ urban praetorship, during which the challenged edict belongs. The accusation was published in 70. Neither date should be mistaken for the enactment of the older Voconian law.

LR-verres-inheritance-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The dispute concerns access to an inheritance through praetorian handling of a will and the relevance of census status. Cicero attacks retrospective alteration of the consequences of acts already performed in reliance on existing rules.

LR-verres-inheritance-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The evidence is the prosecutor’s report of edictal wording and practice. No posted urban edict is separately available. The account must be read with the whole Asellus episode.

LR-verres-inheritance-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Cicero’s examples involving forgery and homicide illustrate prospectivity; they are not additional charges against Asellus’ daughter. Treat Verres’ administrative innovation separately from the statute he purportedly used.

LR-verres-inheritance-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

In C. Verrem §2.1.104

Cicero: archived Latin

nam ut praetor factus est, qui auspicato a Chelidone surrexisset, sortem nactus est urbanae provinciae magis ex sua Chelidonisque quam ex populi Romani voluntate. qui principio qualis in edicto constituendo fuerit cognoscite. P. Annius asellus mortuus est C. Sacerdote praetore. is cum haberet unicam filiam neque census esset, quod eum natura hortabatur, lex nulla prohibebat, fecit ut filiam bonis suis heredem institueret. Heres erat filia. faciebant omnia cum pupilla, legis aequitas, voluntas patris, edicta praetorum, consuetudo iuris eius quod erat tum cum asellus est mortuus.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

法律的公平、父亲的意愿、历任裁判官的告示,以及阿塞卢斯死亡时的法律惯例。
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Enacted: 169 BCE

Lex Voconia

沃科尼乌斯继承法

《沃科尼亚法》不是对女性继承的一概禁止;遗嘱人的财产登记条件和继承人与受遗赠人的区别至关重要。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Verrines II.1.106–110 names the law in the Asellus inheritance dispute. Gaius 2.226 and 2.274 separately report restrictions on legacies and on instituting a woman as heir.

LR-voconia-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

169 BCE is the conventional year of the tribune Q. Voconius Saxa’s enactment, supported by the historical tradition collected by Rotondi. Its invocation by Cicero in 70 is evidence of later relevance.

LR-voconia-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The restriction depends on the testator’s assessed property status; it is not a ban on all female inheritance. Gaius also reports a restriction preventing a legatee from receiving more than heirs, and later mechanisms that could circumvent the restriction.

LR-voconia-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The law is known through separate literary and juristic witnesses. Their monetary thresholds and formulations require care; the dossier does not present a synthesized modern wording as a complete statute.

LR-voconia-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Verres’ treatment of an uncensused testator is central to Cicero’s criticism. Later fideicommissary practice is evidence of the statute’s reception, not a provision enacted in 169.

LR-voconia-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

In C. Verrem §2.1.108

Cicero: archived Latin

in lege Voconia non est fecit fecerit, neque in ulla praeteritum tempus reprehenditur nisi eius rei quae sua sponte tam scelerata et nefaria est ut, etiamsi lex non esset, magnopere vitanda fuerit. atque in his ipsis rebus multa videmus ita sancta esse legibus ut ante facta in iudicium non vocentur; Cornelia testamentaria, nummaria, ceterae complures, in quibus non ius aliquod novum populo constituitur, sed sancitur ut, quod semper malum facinus fuerit, eius quaestio ad populum pertineat ex certo tempore.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

在沃科尼乌斯法里,并没有“已经做过或今后做出”这样的措辞
Source edition ↗
Gaius, Institutes 2.274

Later ancient testimony · Gaius, second century CE

This later jurist identifies a census condition and a fideicommissary route. It does not prohibit every female inheritance or establish the original law’s complete text.

Item mulier, quae ab eo, qui centum milia aeris census est, per legem Voconiam heres institui non potest, tamen fideicommisso relictam sibi hereditatem capere potest.

Latin · Entire bounded excerpt printed here

又如,依《沃科尼亚法》,一个财产登记达到十万阿斯的人不能将某女子指定为继承人;然而,她仍可以取得通过信托遗赠留给自己的遗产。

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

edict · Edict issued: during 73–71 BCE

Verres’ edict favoring the tithe collector

维勒斯偏袒什一税承包人的告示

问题不止是税额,而在先行强征、审判员指定与救济实际可得性;“韦雷斯法”是修辞称呼,不证明存在人民大会法律。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Verrines II.3.25 reports an edict compelling payment of what the tithe collector demanded. §35 quotes the offer of recuperatores if either party wished. These are distinct clauses within Cicero’s reconstruction of fiscal coercion.

LR-verres-tithes-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

The edict belongs to Verres’ Sicilian governorship of 73–71 BCE. A specific issue day, annual republication and uninterrupted duration cannot be inferred from the governorship interval.

LR-verres-tithes-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

Nominal remedies against excessive collection coexist with a rule allowing immediate extraction. Cicero argues that farmers could not realistically recover through judges beholden to the governor. The imbalance concerns enforcement, forum and bargaining power.

LR-verres-tithes-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

This is a forensic report of a provincial edict, not a law voted by the Roman people. The polemical label “Verrian law” does not alter that legal form.

LR-verres-tithes-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Dubouloz distinguishes a choice between local adjudication and the governor’s intervention from the older reconstruction of a choice between a single judge and recuperators. Apparent procedural options must be studied in their provincial setting.

LR-verres-tithes-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

In C. Verrem §2.3.25

Cicero: archived Latin

primum edictum, iudices, audite praeclarum: quantum decumanus edidisset aratorem sibi decumae dare oportere, ut tantum arator decumano dare cogeretur. quo modo? quantum poposcerit Apronius, dato. quid est hoc? utrum praetoris institutum in socios an in hostis victos insani edictum atque imperium tyranni? ego tantundem dabo quantum ille poposcerit? poscet omne quantum exaravero. quid omne? plus immo etiam, inquit, si volet. quid tum? quid censes? aut dabis aut contra edictum fecisse damnabere. per deos immortalis, quid est hoc? veri enim simile non est.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

什一税承包人申报耕作者应向自己交付多少什一税,就强迫耕作者向承包人交付多少。
Source edition ↗
In C. Verrem §2.3.35

Contemporary forensic or political testimony · Cicero, first century BCE; see the speech date in the atlas

The quoted option must be read with Cicero’s accusation that collection occurred first and that the offered adjudicators were unacceptable. The accusation is not an independently established finding of judicial corruption.

illa vero praeclara est clausula edicti, quod omnium controversiarum quae essent inter aratorem et decumanum, si uter velit, edicit se recuperatores daturum. primum quae potest esse controversia, cum is qui petere debet aufert, et cum is non quantum debetur sed quantum commodum est aufert, ille autem unde ablatum est iudicio suum recuperare nullo modo potest? deinde in hoc homo luteus etiam callidus ac veterator esse vult, quod ita scribit, si vter volet, recvperatores dabo. quam lepide se furari putat! Vtrique facit potestatem, sed utrum ita scripserit, si uter volet an si decumanus volet, nihil interest; arator enim tuos istos recuperatores numquam volet.

Latin · Complete section printed here; editorial supplements retained

告示末尾这一条尤其“出色”:对于耕作者与什一税承包人之间的一切争议,他宣布,只要任何一方愿意,便给他们指定追偿审判员。首先,哪里还会有争议可言?本应提出请求的人,竟直接拿走东西;他拿走的又不是应得的数额,而是他自己觉得合意的数额;被拿走东西的人却根本不能通过审判追回自己的财物。其次,这个卑鄙的人还想显得精明老练,写下:“只要任何一方愿意,我就指定追偿审判员。”他以为自己的偷盗手法多么巧妙!他把选择权给双方;但无论写“任何一方愿意”,还是写“什一税承包人愿意”,其实都没有区别,因为耕作者绝不会愿意要你的那些追偿审判员。

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

uncertain · Attested application · 63 BCE; origin disputed

Lex Plautia / Plotia de vi

普劳提乌斯公共暴力法

《普劳提亚暴力法》有明确名称见证,但创设年与所谓《卢塔提亚法》的关系不明;米洛提及的旧案不可变成其本案法源。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Milone 35 expressly mentions proceedings against Clodius under a Plotian law. Sallust, Catiline 31.4, provides a separate explicit witness to Catiline being prosecuted under the Plautian law by L. Paulus.

LR-plautia-vis-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

An explicit historical attestation belongs to the Catilinarian crisis of 63 BCE. Earlier enactment dates, including 78, 70 and the mid-60s, depend on identifying related measures and proposers. Replace the former unqualified mid-60s terminus with the demonstrable 63 BCE witness.

LR-plautia-vis-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The statute provides a public prosecution for vis. The Clodius proceeding mentioned in Milone is an earlier case; Milo’s trial in 52 rests on Pompey’s special law. Caelius’ governing statute raises a distinct identification problem.

LR-plautia-vis-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

No complete statute is recovered. The spelling Plautia/Plotia and the interpretation of Caelio 70 must be tracked; later references to property held by force do not reconstruct the whole criminal law.

LR-plautia-vis-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Rotondi regards a separate Lutatius law as less likely than a Plautian law promoted under Catulus’ influence. Other reconstructions separate them. The atlas retains two research records without claiming two independently proven enactments.

LR-plautia-vis-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro T. Annio Milone §35

Cicero: archived Latin

at valuit odium, fecit iratus, fecit inimicus, fuit ultor iniuriae, punitor doloris sui. quid? si haec non dico maiora fuerunt in Clodio quam in Milone, sed in illo maxima, nulla in hoc, quid voltis amplius? quid enim odisset Clodium Milo, segetem ac materiam suae gloriae, praeter hoc civile odium quo omnis improbos odimus? illi erat ut odisset primum defensorem salutis meae, deinde vexatorem furoris, domitorem armorum suorum, postremo etiam accusatorem suum; reus enim Milonis lege Plotia fuit Clodius quoad vixit. quo tandem animo hoc tyrannum illum tulisse creditis? quantum odium illius et in homine iniusto quam etiam iustum fuisse?

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

依普洛提乌斯法
Source edition ↗
Pro M. Caelio §70

Cicero: archived Latin

Dicta est a me causa, iudices, et perorata. iam intellegitis quantum iudicium sustineatis, quanta res sit commissa vobis. de vi quaeritis. quae lex ad imperium, ad maiestatem, ad statum patriae, ad salutem omnium pertinet, quam legem Quintus Catulus armata dissensione civium rei publicae paene extremis temporibus tulit, quaeque lex sedata illa flamma consulatus mei fumantis reliquias coniurationis exstinxit, hac nunc lege Caeli adulescentia non ad rei publicae poenas sed ad mulieris libidines et delicias deposcitur.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

这部法律,昆图斯·卡图卢斯
Source edition ↗
Sallust, Bellum Catilinae 31.4

Later ancient testimony · Sallust, later first century BCE, narrating 63 BCE

This explicitly names the law in the events of 63 BCE. It provides an attested application, not the first enactment year; macrons follow the cited reading edition.

at Catilīnae crūdēlis animus eadem illa movēbat, tametsī praesidia parābantur et ipse lēge Plautiā interrogātus erat ab L. Paullō.

Latin · Entire bounded excerpt printed here

然而,卡提利纳凶狠的心仍在推动那些同样的图谋,尽管守备已在部署,他本人也已由卢基乌斯·保卢斯依《普劳提亚法》提出控诉。

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

uncertain · Possible enactment: 78 BCE?

Law of Q. Catulus on vis (lex Lutatia)

卡图卢斯公共暴力法(卢塔提乌斯法)

“卢塔提亚法”主要由《为凯利乌斯辩护》70节所称卡图卢斯推出;保留独立条目是为了显示争议,并非断言另有一部完整法律。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Caelio 70 says that Q. Catulus carried the law amid armed civil dissension. It does not preserve an independently headed text called “Lex Lutatia”; that title expresses an identification from the proposer’s name.

LR-lutatia-vis-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

78 BCE is a common reconstruction connecting the allusion with Catulus and Lepidus, not a consular date written in the quoted passage. Alternative constructions of the relationship with the Plautian law remain possible.

LR-lutatia-vis-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

Cicero uses the law’s supposed emergency purpose to argue that Caelius’ alleged conduct does not belong within its intended scope. This is purposive forensic argument, not a complete enumeration of statutory offences.

LR-lutatia-vis-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The decisive witness is a single Ciceronian locus. Repetition of that locus in many modern books does not create independent ancient corroboration.

LR-lutatia-vis-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Greenidge explicitly reviews the uncertain connection; Rotondi prefers a Plautian measure associated with Catulus over a separate Lutatius enactment. The record remains useful as a disputed identification rather than a confidently independent code.

LR-lutatia-vis-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro M. Caelio §70

Cicero: archived Latin

Dicta est a me causa, iudices, et perorata. iam intellegitis quantum iudicium sustineatis, quanta res sit commissa vobis. de vi quaeritis. quae lex ad imperium, ad maiestatem, ad statum patriae, ad salutem omnium pertinet, quam legem Quintus Catulus armata dissensione civium rei publicae paene extremis temporibus tulit, quaeque lex sedata illa flamma consulatus mei fumantis reliquias coniurationis exstinxit, hac nunc lege Caeli adulescentia non ad rei publicae poenas sed ad mulieris libidines et delicias deposcitur.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

你们所审理的是公共暴力案件。
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 52 BCE

Lex Pompeia de vi

庞培公共暴力法

庞培于52年创设的特别审理程序应与55年的审判员选任法区分;阿斯科尼乌斯保存审期、证人程序与发言限时等重要细节。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Milone 15 describes the new inquiry concerning the Appian Way killing. Asconius 36–40 C supplies the special legislative and trial arrangements and distinguishes them from normal procedure.

LR-pompeia-vis-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

52 BCE is fixed by Pompey’s sole consulship and the killing of Clodius. The special inquiry must be kept separate from Pompey’s jury-selection measure of 55; Asconius supplies the event sequence and trial regulations.

LR-pompeia-vis-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The law accelerates the case, gives witnesses a prominent preliminary place and restricts the final speeches to two hours for prosecution and three for defence. The president and selected jury belong to this particular statutory framework.

LR-pompeia-vis-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Cicero’s surviving speech is a revised published text; Asconius is a later historical commentator. Neither is a complete original statute, but together they let us distinguish trial design from defence strategy.

LR-pompeia-vis-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

The exceptional law does not itself prove Milo’s guilt. A general natural-law defence and a particular statutory question can coexist without being identical.

LR-pompeia-vis-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro T. Annio Milone §15

Cicero: archived Latin

at enim Cn. Pompeius rogatione sua et de re et de causa iudicavit: tulit enim de caede quae in Appia via facta esset, in qua P. Clodius occisus esset. quid ergo tulit? nempe ut quaereretur. quid porro quaerendum est? factumne sit? at constat. A quo? at paret. vidit igitur etiam in confessione facti iuris tamen defensionem suscipi posse. quod nisi vidisset, posse absolvi eum qui fateretur, cum videret nos fateri, neque quaeri umquam iussisset nec vobis tam hanc salutarem in iudicando litteram quam illam tristem dedisset. mihi vero Cn. Pompeius non modo nihil gravius contra Milonem iudicasse sed etiam statuisse videtur quid vos in iudicando spectare oporteret. nam qui non poenam confessioni, sed defensionem dedit, is causam interitus quaerendam, non interitum putavit.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

因为他提出的法案,是关于阿庇亚大道上发生的、普布利乌斯·克洛狄乌斯在其中被杀的那起杀人事件。
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 67 BCE

Lex Calpurnia de ambitu

卡尔普尔尼乌斯选举舞弊法

《卡尔普尔尼亚选举贿赂法》与63年的解释性元老院决议应分层;对行为的法律定性不能代替其实际发生的证明。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Murena 46 names the Calpurnian law; §67 reports a senatorial interpretation of conduct contrary to it. Asconius’ discussion of Cornelius and Dio 36.38 set it in the legislative competition of 67.

LR-calpurnia-ambitu-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

67 BCE is the consular date of C. Calpurnius Piso and M’. Acilius Glabrio. The alternative expanded title Acilia Calpurnia reflects that setting, not a second independently established statute.

LR-calpurnia-ambitu-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The law strengthened electoral-corruption sanctions. Murena’s defence distinguishes ordinary personal support from paid attendance, organized distribution of seats and indiscriminate feasting. The Senate’s interpretation in 63 must be treated as a later measure.

LR-calpurnia-ambitu-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The original law does not survive complete. Penalties and legislative circumstances must be assembled from separate witnesses; Cicero’s §67 preserves the interpretive resolution more directly than the whole statute.

LR-calpurnia-ambitu-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Sulla’s earlier electoral conviction and later conspiracy prosecution are separate cases. The Calpurnian law should not be made the governing law of every later charge against a convicted candidate.

LR-calpurnia-ambitu-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro L. Murena §46

Cicero: archived Latin

qua re ego expertus et petendi et defendendi et accusandi molestiam sic intellexi in petendo studium esse acerrimum, in defendendo officium, in accusando laborem. itaque sic statuo fieri nullo modo posse ut idem accusationem et petitionem consulatus diligenter adornet atque instruat. Vnum sustinere pauci possunt, utrumque nemo. tu cum te de curriculo petitionis deflexisses animumque ad accusandum transtulisses, existimasti te utrique negotio satis facere posse. vehementer errasti. quis enim dies fuit, postea quam in istam accusandi denuntiationem ingressus es, quem tu non totum in ista ratione consumpseris? legem ambitus flagitasti, quae tibi non deerat; erat enim severissime scripta Calpurnia. gestus est mos et voluntati et dignitati tuae. sed tota illa lex accusationem tuam, si haberes nocentem reum, fortasse armasset; petitioni vero refragata est.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

因为卡尔普尔尼乌斯法本已规定得极为严厉。
Source edition ↗
Pro L. Murena §67

Cicero: archived Latin

qua re, ut ad id quod institui revertar, tolle mihi e causa nomen Catonis, remove vim, praetermitte auctoritatem quae in iudiciis aut nihil valere aut ad salutem debet valere, congredere mecum criminibus ipsis. quid accusas, Cato, quid adfers ad iudicium, quid arguis? ambitum accusas; non defendo. me reprehendis, quod idem defendam quod lege punierim. punivi ambitum, non innocentiam; ambitum vero ipsum vel tecum accusabo, si voles. dixisti senatus consultum me referente esse factum, si mercede obviam candidatis issent, si conducti sectarentur, si gladiatoribus volgo locus tributim et item prandia si volgo essent data, contra legem Calpurniam factum videri. ergo ita senatus iudicat, contra legem facta haec videri, si facta sint; decernit quod nihil opus est, dum candidatis morem gerit. nam factum sit necne vehementer quaeritur; sin factum sit, quin contra legem sit dubitare nemo potest.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

违反卡尔普尔尼乌斯法
Source edition ↗
Pro L. Murena §67

Contemporary forensic or political testimony · Cicero, first century BCE; see the speech date in the atlas

The conditional formulation is essential: the Senate classifies conduct; the trial must still establish whether the conduct occurred.

qua re, ut ad id quod institui revertar, tolle mihi e causa nomen Catonis, remove vim, praetermitte auctoritatem quae in iudiciis aut nihil valere aut ad salutem debet valere, congredere mecum criminibus ipsis. quid accusas, Cato, quid adfers ad iudicium, quid arguis? ambitum accusas; non defendo. me reprehendis, quod idem defendam quod lege punierim. punivi ambitum, non innocentiam; ambitum vero ipsum vel tecum accusabo, si voles. dixisti senatus consultum me referente esse factum, si mercede obviam candidatis issent, si conducti sectarentur, si gladiatoribus volgo locus tributim et item prandia si volgo essent data, contra legem Calpurniam factum videri. ergo ita senatus iudicat, contra legem facta haec videri, si facta sint; decernit quod nihil opus est, dum candidatis morem gerit. nam factum sit necne vehementer quaeritur; sin factum sit, quin contra legem sit dubitare nemo potest.

Latin · Complete section printed here; editorial supplements retained

因此,回到我原先的论点:请把卡托这个名字从案子中拿开,排除他的影响,暂且不论他的威望(威望在审判中应当毫无作用,或者只应有助于保全被告)请以指控本身同我交锋。卡托,你控告什么?向法庭提出什么?指证什么?你控告选举贿赂;我并不为贿赂辩护。你责备我为自己曾以法律惩罚的事情辩护。我惩罚的是贿赂,不是无辜;你若愿意,我还会同你一起控告贿赂本身。你说元老院依我的提议作出决议:若有人受雇出迎候选人,若有人受雇随行,若角斗表演的座位按部落向众人分配,或向众人普遍提供宴餐,这些行为应视为违反《卡尔普尔尼亚法》。所以元老院判断的是:这些行为如果发生,就应视为违法;它作出一项本无必要的规定,同时顾及候选人的意愿。因为真正受到激烈追问的是事情是否发生;如果确已发生,任何人都不能怀疑其违法。

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 63 BCE

Lex Tullia de ambitu

图利乌斯选举舞弊法

图利乌斯法是西塞罗任执政官时的立法;两年内举办角斗表演的禁令及遗嘱例外可由《诘问瓦提尼乌斯》直接核查。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Murena 3 and 47 make Cicero’s own consular legislation central to the defence; Vatinium 37 expressly states the restriction on gladiatorial shows within two years before candidature, with a testamentary exception.

LR-tullia-ambitu-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

63 BCE is the enactment setting in Cicero’s consulship, preceding Murena’s trial. The ten-year exile provision is supported through later historical testimony, not a complete law quoted in Murena.

LR-tullia-ambitu-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The defence faces the tension between Cicero’s authorship of a stricter law and his representation of a successful candidate. Restrictions on spectacles and penalties are distinct provisions. The reference to illness excuses has been interpreted as concerning defendants or jurors; LEPOR notice 717 favours defendants and does not treat the allocation as self-evident.

LR-tullia-ambitu-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Ciceronian speeches preserve clauses or argumentative references; Dio supplies a later narrative of penalties. Their evidential proximity is different.

LR-tullia-ambitu-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

A testamentary exception is not a general permission to buy popularity through shows. Nor does Cicero’s claim to defend within his own law establish acquittal as a general interpretation of every clause.

LR-tullia-ambitu-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro L. Murena §47

Cicero: archived Latin

Poena gravior in plebem tua voce efflagitata est; commoti animi tenuiorum. exsilium in nostrum ordinem; concessit senatus postulationi tuae, sed non libenter duriorem fortunae communi condicionem te auctore constituit. morbi excusationi poena addita est; voluntas offensa multorum quibus aut contra valetudinis commodum laborandum est aut incommodo morbi etiam ceteri vitae fructus relinquendi. quid ergo? haec quis tulit? is qui auctoritati senatus, voluntati tuae paruit, denique is tulit cui minime proderant. illa ⟨quidem⟩ quae mea summa voluntate senatus frequens repudiavit mediocriter adversata tibi esse existimas? confusionem suffragiorum flagitasti, †praerogationum legis Maniliae†, aequationem gratiae, dignitatis, suffragiorum. graviter homines honesti atque in suis vicinitatibus et municipiis gratiosi tulerunt a tali viro esse pugnatum ut omnes et dignitatis et gratiae gradus tollerentur. idem editicios iudices esse voluisti, ut odia occulta civium quae tacitis nunc discordiis continentur in fortunas optimi cuiusque erumperent.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

对我们这一等级施加流放
Source edition ↗
In P. Vatinium testem interrogatio §37

Contemporary forensic or political testimony · Cicero, first century BCE; see the speech date in the atlas

A quoted restriction and exception support the Tullian dossier; the Aelian and Fufian names concern Cicero’s claimed observance of legislative safeguards. These are different evidential roles.

atque illud etiam audire ⟨de⟩ te cupio, qua re, cum ego legem de ambitu tulerim ex senatus consulto, tulerim sine vi, tulerim salvis auspiciis, tulerim salva lege Aelia et Fufia, tu eam esse legem non putes, praesertim cum ego legibus tuis, quoquo modo latae sunt, paream; cum mea lex dilucide vetet biennio qvo qvis petat petitvrvsve sit gladiatores dare nisi ex testamento praestitvta die, quae tanta in te sit amentia ut in ipsa petitione gladiatores audeas dare? num quem putes illius tui certissimi gladiatoris similem tribunum plebis posse reperiri qui se interponat quo minus reus mea lege fias?

Latin · Complete section printed here; editorial supplements retained

我还想听你说明:我既依元老院决议提出了选举贿赂法,没有使用暴力,没有损害占兆程序,也没有损害《埃利乌斯法》和《富菲乌斯法》,你为何竟不认为那是一部法律?尤其我仍遵守你的那些法律,无论它们究竟怎样通过。我的法律明文禁止:在某人竞选或将要竞选的两年期间内举办角斗表演,除非依遗嘱在预先指定的日期举办。你怎么竟疯狂到敢在竞选当中举行角斗表演?你难道以为还能找到一个保民官,像你那个极可靠的角斗士一样,出面阻止你依我的法律成为被告吗?

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 55 BCE

Lex Licinia de sodaliciis

李锡尼乌斯选举结社法

此法针对有组织的选举腐败,其部落选取审判员程序是辩护重点;它不是《利基尼亚—尤尼亚法》。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Plancio 36–39 expressly discusses the Licinian law, its proposer Crassus and the special selection of judges from tribes. This is direct evidence for procedure as well as statutory identification.

LR-licinia-sodaliciis-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

55 BCE places the measure in Crassus’ second consulship. Plancius’ trial in 54 is a later application. Neither date supplies an exact promulgation day.

LR-licinia-sodaliciis-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The charge concerns organized electoral corruption through associations. The prosecutor nominates four tribes and the defendant rejects one, producing a distinctive disadvantage compared with ordinary jury challenge. Cicero asks whether the selected tribes correspond to the alleged electoral organization.

LR-licinia-sodaliciis-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The surviving speech explains the mechanism in advocacy, rather than transmitting the whole law. The label sodalicia should not be made equivalent to every voluntary association.

LR-licinia-sodaliciis-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Keep this law distinct from the Licinia Iunia on legislative procedure. Shared nomenclature and electoral background do not make their legal functions interchangeable.

LR-licinia-sodaliciis-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro Cn. Plancio §36

Cicero: archived Latin

sed aliquando veniamus ad causam. in qua tu nomine legis Liciniae, quae est de sodaliciis, omnis ambitus leges complexus es; neque enim quicquam aliud in hac lege nisi editicios iudices es secutus. quod genus iudicum si est aequum ulla in re nisi in hac tribuaria, non intellego quam ob rem senatus hoc uno in genere tribus edi voluerit ab accusatore neque eandem editionem transtulerit in ceteras causas, de ipso denique ambitu reiectionem fieri voluerit iudicum alternorum, cumque nullum genus acerbitatis praetermitteret, hoc tamen unum praetereundum putarit.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

你借着那部关于结社的李锡尼乌斯法之名,把所有选举舞弊法都包罗了进去
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Enacted: 65 BCE

Lex Papia

帕皮乌斯公民身份审查法

帕皮乌斯法涉及外来者与身份审查,不是阿尔基阿斯取得公民权的依据;同名线索不能与奥古斯都时代法律混淆。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Archia 10 names the Papian law in discussing people who claimed civic privileges; Balbo 52 gives a specifically Papian prosecution involving Cassius. Dio 37.9.5 places expulsion of outsiders in Papius’ tribunate.

LR-papia-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

65 BCE is the conventional enactment year. The later Archias and Balbus speeches show use and comparison, not the grant of citizenship in that year.

LR-papia-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The instrument belongs to exclusion of non-citizens and scrutiny of asserted status. In Archias’ defence the positive entitlement rests on the Plautia Papiria, while the Papian framework concerns contesting that status.

LR-papia-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Ancient references survive through speeches, commentary and historical narrative. They do not supply a complete procedural code or all exceptions to expulsion.

LR-papia-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

The register distinguishes an explicit law named in a precedent from a reconstructed governing framework for a present case. Do not confuse this Republican law with the Augustan Papia Poppaea.

LR-papia-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro Archia Poeta §10

Cicero: archived Latin

quae cum ita sint, quid est quod de eius civitate dubitetis, praesertim cum aliis quoque in civitatibus fuerit ascriptus? etenim cum mediocribus multis et aut nulla aut humili aliqua arte praeditis gratuito civitatem in Graecia homines impertiebant, Reginos credo aut Locrensis aut Neapolitanos aut Tarentinos, quod scaenicis artificibus largiri solebant, id huic summa ingeni praedito gloria noluisse! quid? cum ceteri non modo post civitatem datam sed etiam post legem Papiam aliquo modo in eorum municipiorum tabulas inrepserunt, hic qui ne utitur quidem illis in quibus est scriptus, quod semper se Heracliensem esse voluit, reicietur?

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

在帕皮乌斯法颁布之后
Source edition ↗
Pro L. Cornelio Balbo §52

Cicero: archived Latin

habetis imperatorum summorum et sapientissimorum hominum, clarissimorum virorum, interpretationem iuris ac foederum: dabo etiam iudicum qui huic quaestioni praefuerunt, dabo universi populi Romani, dabo sanctissimum et sapientissimum iudicium etiam senatus. iudices cum prae se ferrent palamque loquerentur quid essent lege Papia de M. Cassio Mamertinis repetentibus iudicaturi, Mamertini publice suscepta causa destiterunt. multi in civitatem recepti ex liberis foederatisque populis ⟦liberati⟧ sunt: nemo umquam est de civitate accusatus, quod aut populus fundus factus non esset, aut quod foedere civitatis mutandae ius impediretur.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

在马墨耳提人提出追究时,他们将如何依据帕皮乌斯法对马尔库斯·卡西乌斯作出裁断
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Enacted: 89 BCE

Lex Plautia Papiria

普劳提乌斯—帕皮里乌斯公民权法

公民权取得取决于盟邦登记、意大利住所及六十日内向裁判官申报等条件;证据证明这些条件,而非文学声望本身。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Archia 7 quotes the eligibility conditions associated with Silvanus and Carbo: enrolment in an allied community, domicile in Italy when the law was passed and declaration before a praetor within sixty days.

LR-plautia-papiria-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

89 BCE is the conventional Social War date. The declaration window is measured from enactment; it is not sixty days after Archias’ later trial. The speech’s account of compliance is evidence offered by the defence.

LR-plautia-papiria-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The legal case requires linking the person to each condition through community testimony, residence and the praetor’s records. Destruction of municipal records does not itself extinguish citizenship, but changes the evidential problem.

LR-plautia-papiria-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The quoted conditional wording continues into the following section’s narrative. Preserve paragraph boundaries without representing them as a missing part of the law. The official original is not extant here.

LR-plautia-papiria-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

The statute should not be paraphrased as automatically enfranchising every resident of Italy without conditions. Rotondi’s old discussion contains proposer and procedural details that must be checked against Cicero’s actual wording.

LR-plautia-papiria-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro Archia Poeta §7

Cicero: archived Latin

data est civitas Silvani lege et Carbonis: si qui foederatis civitatibus ascripti fuissent, si tum cum lex ferebatur in Italia domicilium habuissent et si sexaginta diebus apud praetorem essent professi. Cum hic domicilium Romae multos iam annos haberet, professus est apud praetorem

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

凡已登记于同盟城邦、在该法提出时以意大利为住所,并在六十日内向裁判官申报者。
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 72 BCE

Lex Gellia Cornelia

盖利乌斯—科尔内利乌斯公民权授权法

格利乌斯—科尔内利乌斯法授权的个人授籍,与城邦整体接受某项罗马法律是不同机制;加的斯条约问题须另行审查。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Balbo 19 expressly names the law and gives the grant made with the advice of Pompey’s council; §32 tests statutory power against treaty restrictions. Cicero uses the statute as the positive authorization of Balbus’ citizenship.

LR-gellia-cornelia-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

72 BCE is the conventional consular date of L. Gellius Publicola and Cn. Cornelius Lentulus. Pompey’s grant and the trial of 56 are distinct events in the legal history.

LR-gellia-cornelia-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The question is whether a commander’s authorized individual grant could benefit a citizen of treaty-bound Gades. Cicero separates the statute’s enabling power, the council’s participation and the effect of treaty provisions.

LR-gellia-cornelia-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The evidence is a named statute and reported grant inside forensic argument. Neither a complete original statute nor Balbus’ original grant document is reproduced.

LR-gellia-cornelia-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

The community’s becoming fundus for collective legislation is not automatically a requirement for an individual military grant. That distinction is argued in Balbo, not to be flattened into a universal rule without examining the treaty.

LR-gellia-cornelia-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro L. Cornelio Balbo §19

Cicero: archived Latin

itaque quod maxime petendum est a vobis idcirco non peto, iudices, ne de vestra sapientia atque de vestra humanitate dubitare videar: est autem petendum ne oderitis ingenium, ne inimici sitis industriae, ne humanitatem opprimendam, ne virtutem puniendam putetis. illud peto, ut, si causam ipsam per se firmam esse et stabilem videritis, hominis ipsius ornamenta adiumento causae potius quam impedimento esse malitis. nascitur, iudices, causa Corneli ex ea lege quam L. Gellius Cn. Cornelius ex senatus sententia tulerunt; qua lege videmus ⟨rite⟩ esse sanctum ut cives Romani sint ii quos Cn. Pompeius de consili sententia singillatim civitate donaverit. Donatum esse L. Cornelium praesens Pompeius dicit, indicant publicae tabulae. accusator fatetur, sed negat ex foederato populo quemquam potuisse, nisi is populus fundus factus esset, in hanc civitatem venire.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

该法规定:凡格奈乌斯·庞培经顾问团合议而逐一授予公民权者,均依法成为罗马公民。
Source edition ↗
Pro L. Cornelio Balbo §19

Contemporary forensic or political testimony · Cicero, first century BCE; see the speech date in the atlas

This section contains the statute, the commander’s reported act, public records, and the opponent’s treaty objection. These are four distinct evidential steps. Angle brackets retain an editorial supplement.

itaque quod maxime petendum est a vobis idcirco non peto, iudices, ne de vestra sapientia atque de vestra humanitate dubitare videar: est autem petendum ne oderitis ingenium, ne inimici sitis industriae, ne humanitatem opprimendam, ne virtutem puniendam putetis. illud peto, ut, si causam ipsam per se firmam esse et stabilem videritis, hominis ipsius ornamenta adiumento causae potius quam impedimento esse malitis. nascitur, iudices, causa Corneli ex ea lege quam L. Gellius Cn. Cornelius ex senatus sententia tulerunt; qua lege videmus ⟨rite⟩ esse sanctum ut cives Romani sint ii quos Cn. Pompeius de consili sententia singillatim civitate donaverit. Donatum esse L. Cornelium praesens Pompeius dicit, indicant publicae tabulae. accusator fatetur, sed negat ex foederato populo quemquam potuisse, nisi is populus fundus factus esset, in hanc civitatem venire.

Latin · Complete section printed here; editorial supplements retained

所以,审判员们,我没有提出最应向你们提出的请求,是因为不愿显得怀疑你们的智慧与仁厚;那请求就是:不要憎恶才干,不要仇视勤奋,不要认为文雅应受压制、德行应受惩罚。我所请求的是,如果你们看见本案自身立得住、根基稳固,就愿意让当事人的优点有助于他的案子,而不是成为阻碍。 审判员们,科尔内利乌斯的案子,起于卢基乌斯·格利乌斯与格奈乌斯·科尔内利乌斯依元老院意见提出的那部法律。我们看见,该法〈正式〉规定:凡格奈乌斯·庞培依其顾问团意见逐个授予公民权的人,均为罗马公民。在场的庞培说,卢基乌斯·科尔内利乌斯已经获授公民权;公共记录也表明如此。控方承认这一点,但否认在有关城邦未表示接受的情况下,任何条约城邦成员能够进入罗马公民共同体。

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 90 BCE

Lex Iulia de civitate

尤利乌斯公民权法

90年的朱利亚公民权法是集体授籍比较材料,并非巴尔布斯个人授籍的直接法源。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Balbo 21 names the Julian law and discusses peoples becoming fundi. Cicero introduces it as a comparison for collective adoption, not as the immediate instrument granting Balbus citizenship.

LR-iulia-civitate-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

90 BCE dates the citizenship law associated with L. Julius Caesar’s consulship during the Social War. It is not Caesar the dictator’s repetundae law of 59.

LR-iulia-civitate-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The speech uses collective civic arrangements to explain why one must distinguish community-wide acceptance of a Roman law from an authorized benefit to an individual. Citizenship acquisition and the community’s internal legal order are related but separate.

LR-iulia-civitate-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The statute is reconstructed from literary testimony. The particular fundus argument in Balbo cannot supply every territorial or political condition of the original enfranchisement.

LR-iulia-civitate-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Do not cite the Julian law as Balbus’ operative grant, or infer that all allied communities accepted it at the same moment. The relationship in the graph remains comparative.

LR-iulia-civitate-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro L. Cornelio Balbo §21

Cicero: archived Latin

tulit apud maiores nostros legem C. Furius de testamentis, tulit Q. Voconius de mulierum hereditatibus; innumerabiles aliae leges de civili iure sunt latae; quas Latini voluerunt, adsciverunt; ipsa denique Iulia, qua lege civitas est sociis et Latinis data, qui fundi populi facti non essent civitatem non haberent. in quo magna contentio Heracliensium et Neapolitanorum fuit, cum magna pars in iis civitatibus foederis sui libertatem civitati anteferret. postremo haec vis est istius et iuris et verbi, ut fundi populi beneficio nostro, non suo iure fiant.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

最后还有尤利乌斯法本身,依此法,同盟者和拉丁人获得了公民权
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 95 BCE

Lex Licinia Mucia

李锡尼乌斯—穆基乌斯公民身份法

95年的利基尼亚—穆基亚法限制不具资格的公民身份主张;它在巴尔布斯案中提供历史比较,而非授籍依据。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Balbo 48 recalls the restrictive law and its severe application. Asconius 67–68 C explains the legislation of Crassus and Scaevola and its connection with resentment among Italian allies.

LR-licinia-mucia-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

95 BCE is the joint consular year of L. Licinius Crassus and Q. Mucius Scaevola. The later Social War is historical consequence and context, not the law’s enactment event.

LR-licinia-mucia-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The law addressed people asserting Roman citizenship without entitlement. Its use in Balbo is a historical comparison about the handling of status, rather than the positive source of Balbus’ enfranchisement.

LR-licinia-mucia-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Cicero’s reference and Asconius’ explanation are separate literary witnesses; no original census investigation dossier is available here.

LR-licinia-mucia-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Asconius’ causal explanation for allied alienation is historical interpretation. It should not be turned into proof that this one statute alone caused the Social War.

LR-licinia-mucia-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro L. Cornelio Balbo §48

Cicero: archived Latin

itaque cum paucis annis post hanc civitatis donationem acerrima de civitate quaestio Licinia et Mucia lege venisset, num quis eorum, qui de foederatis civitatibus esset civitate donatus, in iudicium est vocatus? nam Spoletinus T. Matrinius, unus ex iis quos C. Marius civitate donasset, dixit causam ex colonia Latina in primis firma et inlustri. quem cum disertus homo L. Antistius accusaret, non dixit fundum Spoletinum populum non esse factum,—videbat enim populos de suo iure, non de nostro fundos fieri solere,—sed cum lege Apuleia coloniae non essent deductae, qua lege Saturninus C. Mario tulerat ut in singulas colonias ternos civis Romanos facere posset, negabat hoc beneficium re ipsa sublata valere debere.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

依李锡尼乌斯—穆基乌斯法进行的极其严厉的公民身份审查
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enactments: early 2nd century BCE

Leges Porciae / lex Porcia

波尔基乌斯诸法:公民人身保护

波尔基乌斯诸法必须保留复数;各法作者、日期和境外适用范围不能由一句反杖刑的辩词全部推出。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Rabirio perduellionis 12 contrasts Porcian protection against rods with the Sempronian protection of citizens’ lives. Republic 2.54 explicitly speaks of three Porcian laws by three Porcii.

LR-porciae-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

Early second-century BCE is a cautious conventional placement. Rotondi’s discussion shows that the attribution and date of each of the three measures remain insecure; the plural should not be compressed into one precisely dated statute.

LR-porciae-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The evidence concerns bodily coercion and the safeguards of citizenship. In Rabirius, Cicero mobilizes those protections against an archaizing capital procedure; in the Verrines the issue is a governor’s treatment of citizens.

LR-porciae-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The laws are known through retrospective literary testimony and allusions, with no complete original text. Family coinage may commemorate civic protection but does not automatically identify all three measures.

LR-porciae-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

The reach of provocatio outside Rome and under military command is a separate historical question. The dossier does not derive a universal appeal procedure from the short forensic slogan.

LR-porciae-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro C. Rabirio Perduellionis Reo Ad Quirites §12

Cicero: archived Latin

popularis vero tribunus pl. custos defensorque iuris et libertatis! Porcia lex virgas ab omnium civium Romanorum corpore amovit, hic misericors flagella rettulit; Porcia lex libertatem civium lictori eripuit, Labienus, homo popularis, carnifici tradidit; C. Gracchus legem tulit ne de capite civium Romanorum iniussu vestro iudicaretur, hic popularis a iiviris iniussu vestro non iudicari de cive Romano sed indicta causa civem Romanum capitis condemnari coegit.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

波尔基乌斯法使所有罗马公民的身体免遭棍杖鞭打
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Enacted: 123 BCE

Lex Sempronia de capite civium

森普罗尼乌斯公民生命案件法

塞姆普罗尼乌斯法的重点是公民生命案件的合法授权;紧急状态、常设法庭及58年克洛狄乌斯立法须另作区分。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Rabirio perduellionis 12 explicitly attributes to a Sempronian law protection against deciding a citizen’s caput without the people’s authorization. Plutarch, Gaius Gracchus 4, supplies historical context for the measure against unauthorized capital action.

LR-sempronia-capite-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

123 BCE is the conventional Gracchan enactment year. The prosecution of Popillius and later invocations in 70 and 63 are distinct episodes, not fresh enactments of the same measure.

LR-sempronia-capite-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The rule concerns competent authorization for a capital proceeding or deprivation of civic life. Its relationship to standing courts, emergency action and the people’s powers is argued, not resolved merely by quoting a prohibition.

LR-sempronia-capite-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The dossier uses literary witnesses to the law and its interpretation, not an original tablet. The plural Sempronian laws elsewhere in Cicero may refer to a broader legislative tradition.

LR-sempronia-capite-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Do not treat the later Clodian general measure of 58 as the same enactment. Nor should Cicero’s defence of his own actions in 63 automatically settle the law’s proper interpretation.

LR-sempronia-capite-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro C. Rabirio Perduellionis Reo Ad Quirites §12

Cicero: archived Latin

popularis vero tribunus pl. custos defensorque iuris et libertatis! Porcia lex virgas ab omnium civium Romanorum corpore amovit, hic misericors flagella rettulit; Porcia lex libertatem civium lictori eripuit, Labienus, homo popularis, carnifici tradidit; C. Gracchus legem tulit ne de capite civium Romanorum iniussu vestro iudicaretur, hic popularis a iiviris iniussu vestro non iudicari de cive Romano sed indicta causa civem Romanum capitis condemnari coegit.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

盖乌斯·格拉古立法规定:未经你们授权,不得审判涉及罗马公民生命与身份的案件。
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Pre-existing by: 57 BCE; origin undated

Lex Papiria de dedicationibus

帕皮里乌斯奉献法

123年的既往案例证明人民授权原则的历史背景,却没有点名帕皮里乌斯法,故不能直接确定该法的创设上限;它与304年措施的同一性也有疑问。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Domo 127–128 names an old tribunician Papirian law forbidding consecration of a building, land or altar without the plebs’ authorization; §§136–137 report the pontiffs’ answer concerning Licinia’s dedication.

LR-papiria-dedication-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

The law was already old when invoked in 57 BCE. The Licinia precedent is dated by its consuls to 123 BCE, but §136 does not name the Papirian statute: making that precedent a firm terminus for this specific law would be an inference. Its identification with Livy’s measure of 304 remains disputed.

LR-papiria-dedication-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The issue is competence to make a dedication binding on public and sacred law. The prior Licinia case provides a model for asking whether Clodius had adequate authority to consecrate Cicero’s site.

LR-papiria-dedication-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Cicero transmits both a legal restriction and a report of pontifical decision-making. These are different documentary layers; neither is an independently surviving original enactment.

LR-papiria-dedication-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Livy 9.46.7 describes approval by Senate or a majority of tribunes, whereas Cicero stresses authorization of the plebs. Rotondi therefore doubts simple identity and allows a later supplementary measure.

LR-papiria-dedication-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

De Domo Sua Ad Pontifices §128

Cicero: archived Latin

sed quia consecrabantur aedes, non privatorum domicilia, sed quae sacrae nominantur, consecrabantur agri, non ita ut nostra praedia, si qui vellet, sed ut imperator agros de hostibus captos consecraret, statuebantur arae, quae religionem adferrent ipsi ⟨ei⟩ loco ⟨quo⟩ essent consecratae, haec nisi plebs iussisset fieri vetuit. quae si tu interpretaris de nostris aedibus atque agris scripta esse, non repugno; sed quaero quae lex lata sit ut tu aedis meas consecrares, ubi tibi haec potestas data sit, quo iure feceris. neque ego nunc de religione sed de bonis omnium nostrum, nec de pontificio sed de iure publico disputo. lex Papiria vetat aedis iniussu plebis consecrari. sit sane hoc de nostris aedibus ac non de publicis templis: unum ostende verbum consecrationis in ipsa tua lege, si illa lex est ac non vox sceleris et crudelitatis tuae.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

帕皮里乌斯法禁止未经平民大会授权而将建筑奉为神圣。
Source edition ↗
De Domo Sua Ad Pontifices §136

Contemporary forensic or political testimony · Cicero, first century BCE; see the speech date in the atlas

The consular pair anchors the Licinia precedent to 123 BCE. The paragraph does not name the Papirian law; it supplies a parallel principle and pontifical response, not a secure enactment date for that law.

sed ut revertar ad ius publicum dedicandi, quod ipsi pontifices semper non solum ad suas caerimonias sed etiam ad populi iussa adcommodaverunt, habetis in commentariis vestris C. Cassium censorem de signo Concordiae dedicando ad pontificum conlegium rettulisse, eique M. Aemilium pontificem maximum pro conlegio respondisse, nisi eum populus Romanus nominatim praefecisset atque eius iussu faceret, non videri eam posse recte dedicari. quid? cum Licinia, virgo Vestalis summo loco nata, sanctissimo sacerdotio praedita, T. Flaminio Q. Metello consulibus aram et aediculam et pulvinar sub saxo dedicasset, nonne eam rem ex auctoritate senatus ad hoc conlegium Sex. Iulius praetor rettulit? cum P. Scaevola pontifex maximus pro conlegio respondit, qvod in loco pvblico Licinia, Gai filia, inivssv popvli dedicasset, sacrvm non viderier. quam quidem rem quanta ⟨tractaverit⟩ severitate quantaque diligentia senatus, ex ipso senatus consulto facile cognoscetis.

Latin · Complete section printed here; editorial supplements retained

不过,让我回到献置的公法原则;祭司们一向不仅使它符合自己的仪式,而且使它符合人民的命令。你们的记录中载有:监察官盖乌斯·卡西乌斯曾把献置和谐女神像的问题提交祭司团,最高祭司马尔库斯·埃米利乌斯代表祭司团回答说,除非罗马人民指名委任他办理,并且他依人民的命令行事,否则看来便不能正当地献置该像。再看另一件事:维斯塔贞女利基尼娅出身极高贵,任职于极神圣的祭司职务,在提图斯·弗拉米尼乌斯与昆图斯·梅特卢斯任执政官时,于岩下献置一座祭坛、一座小祠和一张神座。裁判官塞克斯图斯·尤利乌斯不是依元老院的授权,把此事提交本祭司团了吗?最高祭司普布利乌斯·斯凯沃拉当时代表祭司团答复说:“盖乌斯之女利基尼娅未经人民命令,在公共土地上献置的东西,看来不具有神圣性。”元老院对这件事采取了何等严肃、何等审慎的处理,你们从元老院决议本身便容易知道。

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Enacted: 58 BCE

Clodius’ enactment naming Cicero’s interdiction

克洛狄乌斯针对西塞罗的禁绝水火决议

针对西塞罗个人的放逐措施与一般性公民生命法不同;公布、表决、离城与执行的时间顺序仍须谨慎重建。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Domo 47 criticizes the tense of the named measure against Cicero; §50 reports its charge concerning a false senatorial resolution. His letters and later historians show the practical effects of exile and confiscation.

LR-clodia-exile-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

58 BCE is secure. Proposed exact March/April dates depend on reconstructing publication, voting and Cicero’s movements; Rotondi records internal scholarly disagreement. The atlas does not claim a verified exact day.

LR-clodia-exile-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The measure singles out Cicero and supports interdiction, confiscation and restrictions on assistance or restoration. Cicero challenges it as an unlawful privilegium and denies that a properly authorized judgment preceded it.

LR-clodia-exile-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The text is preserved in hostile quotation and historical reports, not a complete plebiscite. The general measure concerning untried citizens is registered separately.

LR-clodia-exile-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Greenidge’s reconstruction of a time limit for appearance is criticized by Rotondi. This illustrates why the dossier records arguments rather than harmonizing all accounts into one invented procedure.

LR-clodia-exile-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

De Domo Sua Ad Pontifices §47

Cicero: archived Latin

date hanc tribuno plebis licentiam, et intuemini paulisper animis iuventutem et eos maxime qui inminere iam cupiditate videntur in tribuniciam potestatem: conlegia medius fidius tribunorum plebis tota reperientur, hoc iure firmato, quae coeant de hominum locupletissimorum bonis, praeda praesertim populari et spe largitionis oblata. at quid tulit legum scriptor peritus et callidus? velitis ivbeatis vt M. Tvllio aqva et igni interdicatvr? crudele, nefarium, ne in sceleratissimo quidem civi sine iudicio ferundum! non tulit vt interdicatvr. quid ergo? vt interdictvm sit. O caenum, o portentum, o scelus! hanc tibi legem Clodius scripsit spurciorem lingua sua, ut interdictum sit cui non sit interdictum? Sexte noster, bona venia, quoniam iam dialecticus ⟨es⟩ et haec quoque liguris, quod factum non est, ut sit factum, ferri ad populum aut verbis ullis sanciri aut suffragiis confirmari potest?

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

他提出的不是“应当对其禁绝水火”。那是什么?是“对其已禁绝水火”。
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Enacted: 58 BCE

Clodian enactment restricting auspicial obstruction

克洛狄乌斯限制以占兆阻止议事的决议

克洛狄乌斯措施涉及以观天等手段阻滞大会,不能概括为废除所有占兆或一切保民官否决权。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Sestio 33 attacks the legislative changes of 58. Asconius 8 C explains a prohibition on observing the sky on days when business could be transacted with the people and relates it to the Aelian law.

LR-clodia-auspices-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

58 BCE belongs to Clodius’ tribunate under Piso and Gabinius. Vatinium’s conduct in 59 precedes that change; his later examination is not evidence that the Clodian measure already operated in his tribunate.

LR-clodia-auspices-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The practical issue is obstruction or validity of assemblies through announced celestial observation and adverse religious reports. Cicero portrays the change as demolition of constitutional safeguards.

LR-clodia-auspices-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The record combines polemical Ciceronian characterization with Asconius’ later explanation. It does not preserve the complete statute or every exception.

LR-clodia-auspices-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

“Abolition of auspices” is too broad. Rotondi’s expansive formulation about intercession should not displace the narrower practice described by Asconius; auspices, obnuntiatio and tribunician veto are distinguishable.

LR-clodia-auspices-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro P. Sestio §33

Cicero: archived Latin

quid? sua sponte homines in amicorum periculis vestitum mutare non solent? pro te ipso, Piso, nemone mutabit? ne isti quidem quos legatos non modo nullo senatus consulto, sed etiam repugnante senatu tibi tute legasti? ergo hominis desperati et proditoris rei publicae casum lugebunt fortasse qui volent: civis florentissimi benivolentia bonorum et optime de salute patriae meriti periculum, coniunctum cum periculo civitatis, lugere senatui non licebit? idemque consules, si appellandi sunt consules quos nemo est quin non modo ex memoria sed etiam ex fastis evellendos putet, pacto iam foedere provinciarum, producti in circo Flaminio in contionem ab illa furia ac peste patriae, maximo cum gemitu vestro, illa omnia quae tum contra me contraque rem publicam ⟨agebantur⟩ voce ac sententia sua comprobaverunt. isdemque consulibus sedentibus atque inspectantibus lata lex est, ne avspicia valerent, ne qvis obnvntiaret, ne qvis legi intercederet, vt omnibvs fastis diebvs legem ferri liceret, vt lex Aelia, lex Fvfia ne valeret: qua una rogatione quis est qui non intellegat universam rem publicam esse deletam?

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

使埃利乌斯法与富菲乌斯法不再有效
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enactment: 2nd century BCE; uncertain

Lex Aelia

埃利乌斯议事占兆法

埃利乌斯法常与富菲乌斯法并称,但各条款归属和确切年代并不明;“约一百年前”不是精确纪年。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Vatinium 18 and 23 names the Aelian and Fufian laws; Asconius 8 C specifically associates the Aelian law with confirmation of obnuntiatio.

LR-aelia-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

The original date and proposer are uncertain. Rotondi’s approximate 158 BCE comes from interpreting Cicero’s rounded century before the Clodian change, not an independently dated enactment record.

LR-aelia-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The law formed part of the procedural and religious constraints invoked against legislation. In Vatinium the question is his handling of constitutional obstacles in 59, before Clodius’ measure.

LR-aelia-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Separate naming and occasional individual allusion support distinct laws, but do not supply a complete division of their clauses. The surviving evidence is literary.

LR-aelia-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Do not assign every rule about elections, auspices and legislative timing to this law merely because Cicero often pairs its name with Fufia. The particular allocation remains partly reconstructed.

LR-aelia-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

In P. Vatinium testem interrogatio §18

Cicero: archived Latin

simul etiam illud volo uti respondeas, cum te tribuno plebis esset etiam tum in re publica lex Aelia et Fufia, quae leges saepe numero tribunicios furores debilitarunt et represserunt, quas contra praeter te nemo umquam est facere conatus,—quae quidem leges anno post, sedentibus in templo duobus non consulibus sed proditoribus huius civitatis ac pestibus, una cum auspiciis, cum intercessionibus, cum omni iure publico conflagraverunt: ecquando dubitaris contra eas leges cum plebe agere et concilium convocare? num quem ex omnibus tribunis plebis, quicumque seditiosi fuerunt, tam audacem audieris fuisse ut umquam contra legem Aeliam aut Fufiam concilium advocaret?

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

在你担任保民官时,埃利乌斯法与富菲乌斯法在共和国中尚且有效
Source edition ↗
In P. Vatinium testem interrogatio §37

Contemporary forensic or political testimony · Cicero, first century BCE; see the speech date in the atlas

A quoted restriction and exception support the Tullian dossier; the Aelian and Fufian names concern Cicero’s claimed observance of legislative safeguards. These are different evidential roles.

atque illud etiam audire ⟨de⟩ te cupio, qua re, cum ego legem de ambitu tulerim ex senatus consulto, tulerim sine vi, tulerim salvis auspiciis, tulerim salva lege Aelia et Fufia, tu eam esse legem non putes, praesertim cum ego legibus tuis, quoquo modo latae sunt, paream; cum mea lex dilucide vetet biennio qvo qvis petat petitvrvsve sit gladiatores dare nisi ex testamento praestitvta die, quae tanta in te sit amentia ut in ipsa petitione gladiatores audeas dare? num quem putes illius tui certissimi gladiatoris similem tribunum plebis posse reperiri qui se interponat quo minus reus mea lege fias?

Latin · Complete section printed here; editorial supplements retained

我还想听你说明:我既依元老院决议提出了选举贿赂法,没有使用暴力,没有损害占兆程序,也没有损害《埃利乌斯法》和《富菲乌斯法》,你为何竟不认为那是一部法律?尤其我仍遵守你的那些法律,无论它们究竟怎样通过。我的法律明文禁止:在某人竞选或将要竞选的两年期间内举办角斗表演,除非依遗嘱在预先指定的日期举办。你怎么竟疯狂到敢在竞选当中举行角斗表演?你难道以为还能找到一个保民官,像你那个极可靠的角斗士一样,出面阻止你依我的法律成为被告吗?

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enactment: 2nd century BCE; uncertain

Lex Fufia

富菲乌斯议事占兆法

这里的富菲乌斯法属于较早的立法程序规范,不是后来审判投票或解放奴隶方面的同名法律。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Vatinium 18 attests the paired Aelian and Fufian framework; other Ciceronian references collected by Rotondi distinguish the Fufian name in legislative disputes.

LR-fufia-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

A second-century BCE date is approximate. The proposer and exact year are not secured by the passages in this dossier; the law cannot simply inherit every inferred detail of the Aelian measure.

LR-fufia-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The relevant role is procedural control of legislation and the possible consequences of violating such controls. Cicero invokes these safeguards rhetorically against Vatinius’ use of tribunician power.

LR-fufia-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

No complete statute survives here. Reconstructions allocating an action or penalty specifically to Fufia depend on scattered literary references rather than a quoted complete chapter.

LR-fufia-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Do not confuse this older Fufian law with Fufius Calenus’ later jury-voting law or the Fufia Caninia on manumission. These are different instruments.

LR-fufia-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

In P. Vatinium testem interrogatio §18

Cicero: archived Latin

simul etiam illud volo uti respondeas, cum te tribuno plebis esset etiam tum in re publica lex Aelia et Fufia, quae leges saepe numero tribunicios furores debilitarunt et represserunt, quas contra praeter te nemo umquam est facere conatus,—quae quidem leges anno post, sedentibus in templo duobus non consulibus sed proditoribus huius civitatis ac pestibus, una cum auspiciis, cum intercessionibus, cum omni iure publico conflagraverunt: ecquando dubitaris contra eas leges cum plebe agere et concilium convocare? num quem ex omnibus tribunis plebis, quicumque seditiosi fuerunt, tam audacem audieris fuisse ut umquam contra legem Aeliam aut Fufiam concilium advocaret?

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

在你担任保民官时,埃利乌斯法与富菲乌斯法在共和国中尚且有效
Source edition ↗
In P. Vatinium testem interrogatio §37

Contemporary forensic or political testimony · Cicero, first century BCE; see the speech date in the atlas

A quoted restriction and exception support the Tullian dossier; the Aelian and Fufian names concern Cicero’s claimed observance of legislative safeguards. These are different evidential roles.

atque illud etiam audire ⟨de⟩ te cupio, qua re, cum ego legem de ambitu tulerim ex senatus consulto, tulerim sine vi, tulerim salvis auspiciis, tulerim salva lege Aelia et Fufia, tu eam esse legem non putes, praesertim cum ego legibus tuis, quoquo modo latae sunt, paream; cum mea lex dilucide vetet biennio qvo qvis petat petitvrvsve sit gladiatores dare nisi ex testamento praestitvta die, quae tanta in te sit amentia ut in ipsa petitione gladiatores audeas dare? num quem putes illius tui certissimi gladiatoris similem tribunum plebis posse reperiri qui se interponat quo minus reus mea lege fias?

Latin · Complete section printed here; editorial supplements retained

我还想听你说明:我既依元老院决议提出了选举贿赂法,没有使用暴力,没有损害占兆程序,也没有损害《埃利乌斯法》和《富菲乌斯法》,你为何竟不认为那是一部法律?尤其我仍遵守你的那些法律,无论它们究竟怎样通过。我的法律明文禁止:在某人竞选或将要竞选的两年期间内举办角斗表演,除非依遗嘱在预先指定的日期举办。你怎么竟疯狂到敢在竞选当中举行角斗表演?你难道以为还能找到一个保民官,像你那个极可靠的角斗士一样,出面阻止你依我的法律成为被告吗?

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 98 BCE

Lex Caecilia Didia

凯基利乌斯—狄狄乌斯立法程序法

凯基利乌斯—狄狄乌斯法涉及预先公布和禁止混合表决;三次集市间隔的历法换算不应伪装成无争议的固定天数。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Domo 41 invokes the law in an argument about publication before a vote; §53 explains the objection to bundling unlike proposals. Philippic 5.8 couples its name with the trinundinum requirement.

LR-caecilia-didia-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

98 BCE is the consular enactment year of Q. Caecilius Metellus Nepos and T. Didius. The later cases are evidence of continuing invocation, not proof of an unchanged effective term.

LR-caecilia-didia-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The two principal questions are sufficient public notice and freedom to accept or reject distinct proposals separately. Cicero applies those principles to Clodius’ adoption and legislation, but that application itself requires legal argument.

LR-caecilia-didia-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The statute is known through citations and explanations. The exact conversion of trinum nundinum into modern elapsed days is not supplied as an uncontroversial number here.

LR-caecilia-didia-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

The rule against a rogatio per saturam is not a general modern single-subject doctrine with identical exceptions. The ancient political and voting mechanisms need to remain visible.

LR-caecilia-didia-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

De Domo Sua Ad Pontifices §53

Cicero: archived Latin

quod si iam populus Romanus de ista re consultus esset et non omnia per servos latronesque gessisses, nonne fieri poterat ut populo de Cyprio rege placeret, de exsulibus Byzantiis displiceret? quae est, quaeso, alia vis, quae sententia Caeciliae legis et Didiae nisi haec, ne populo necesse sit in coniunctis rebus compluribus aut id quod nolit accipere aut id quod velit repudiare? quid? si per vim tulisti, tamenne lex est? aut quicquam iure gestum videri potest quod per vim gestum esse constet? an, si in ipsa latione tua capta iam urbe lapides iacti, si manus conlata non est, idcirco tu ad illam labem atque eluviem civitatis sine summa vi pervenire potuisti?

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

不使人民在捆绑在一起的多个事项中,被迫接受其不愿接受的,或拒绝其愿意接受的
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 62 BCE

Lex Licinia Iunia

李锡尼乌斯—尤尼乌斯立法程序法

利基尼亚—尤尼亚法关系立法文书的保全与公开;国库保存的是法案还是已通过法律,研究史上仍有解释差别。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Vatinium 33 expressly refers to proceedings under the Licinia Iunia; Philippic 5.8 mentions the more recent Junia Licinia alongside Caecilia Didia. The reversed order of names does not create another law.

LR-licinia-iunia-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

62 BCE is the consular date of D. Junius Silanus and L. Licinius Murena. The interrogation of Vatinius in 56 concerns a prior accusation, not the law’s enactment.

LR-licinia-iunia-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The law belongs to authentication and publication of legislation. The familiar requirement to deposit a copy at the treasury, with witnesses, rests on wider testimony and scholarly reconstruction; the Vatinium passage alone proves neither its entire wording nor all procedural penalties.

LR-licinia-iunia-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Scattered literary testimony supports a legislative safeguard and enforcement. Rotondi records disagreement over whether the deposit concerned the proposed text or the enacted law.

LR-licinia-iunia-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Do not present the deposit-before-vote interpretation as undisputed. Separate the charge under the law from proof that the charge was sustained.

LR-licinia-iunia-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

In P. Vatinium testem interrogatio §33

Cicero: archived Latin

quaero etiam illud ex te, quod privatus admisisti, in quo certe iam tibi dicere non licebit cum clarissimis viris causam tuam esse coniunctam, postulatusne sis lege Licinia et Iunia? edixeritne C. Memmius praetor ex ea lege ut adesses die tricensimo? cum is dies venisset, fecerisne quod in hac re publica non modo factum antea numquam est, sed in omni memoria est omnino inauditum? appellarisne tribunos plebis ne causam diceres—levius dixi; quamquam id ipsum esset et novum et non ferendum—sed appellarisne nominatim pestem illius anni, furiam patriae, tempestatem rei publicae, Clodium. qui tamen cum iure, cum more, cum potestate iudicium impedire non posset, rediit ad illam vim et furorem suum, ducemque se militibus tuis praebuit. in quo ne quid a me dictum in te potius putes quam abs te esse quaesitum, nullum onus imponam mihi testimoni: quae mihi brevi tempore ex eodem isto loco video esse dicenda servabo, teque non arguam, sed, ut in ceteris rebus feci, rogabo.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

你是否曾依据李锡尼乌斯—尤尼乌斯法受到控告?
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Enacted: 67 BCE

Lex Cornelia de edictis (C. Cornelius)

科尔内利乌斯裁判官告示法

67年的科尔内利乌斯告示法约束裁判官依其常设告示司法;这里的perpetuum并非哈德良时代的《永久告示》定本。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Asconius 59 C expressly reports that Cornelius carried a law requiring praetors to administer justice according to their standing edicts. Dio 36.40 supplies a parallel historical account.

LR-cornelia-edictis-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

67 BCE is the tribunate of C. Cornelius, distinct from Sulla’s legislation of 81. Verres’ earlier praetorships cannot be judged as violations of a statute that had not yet been enacted.

LR-cornelia-edictis-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The law constrains variation in the magistrate’s announced administration of justice and aims at favouritism. It does not abolish praetorian interpretation or transform every edict into a popular statute.

LR-cornelia-edictis-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Asconius provides an ancient paraphrase incorporating a compact statement of the rule. The complete enactment is lost; the expression edicta perpetua here refers to standing edicts.

LR-cornelia-edictis-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Do not identify this with the imperial codification conventionally associated with Hadrian and Julian. Rotondi already notes that the constraint should not be construed absolutely.

LR-cornelia-edictis-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Asconius, pp. 59 Clark (1907)

Asconius: Latin commentary, Clark 1907

Aliam deinde legem Cornelius, etsi nemo repugnare ausus est, multis tamen invitis tulit, ut praetores ex edictis suis perpetuis ius dicerent: quae res studium aut gratiam ambitiosis praetoribus qui varie ius dicere assueverant sustulit.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

规定裁判官应依照自己事先公布、在任期内持续适用的告示行使司法权。
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 81 BCE

Lex Cornelia de maiestate (Sulla)

苏拉的科尔内利乌斯损害国家尊严法

须区分苏拉的叛国规范、科尔内利乌斯自己的立法,以及66和65年的控诉;宣读法案、否决与通过表决不是同一程序阶段。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Asconius 59–61 C expressly identifies the Cornelian maiestas prosecution of Cornelius, including the Cominii accusers and the interruption of the first proceeding.

LR-cornelia-maiestate-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

81 BCE is the conventional Sullan enactment date. The accusation in 66 and renewed trial in 65 are later applications; they must not be confused with the defendant’s own legislation in 67.

LR-cornelia-maiestate-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The accusation turns on Cornelius reading his proposal despite intercession. The defence contests whether the act violated tribunician power and public authority. Legislative reading, a colleague’s veto and completion of a vote are separate stages.

LR-cornelia-maiestate-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The complete statute is not extant here. Asconius’ account and surviving quotations of the defence provide evidence for application, not every act originally covered by maiestas.

LR-cornelia-maiestate-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

The imperial law of treason and offences against an emperor cannot be retrojected into this Republican dispute. A surviving account of an accusation does not itself prove the charged constitutional violation.

LR-cornelia-maiestate-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Asconius, pp. 59–61 Clark (1907)

Asconius: Latin commentary, Clark 1907

Sequenti deinde anno M'.Lepido L. Volcacio coss., quo anno praetor Cicero fuit, reum Cornelium duo fratres Cominii lege Cornelia de maiestate fecerunt. Detulit nomen Publius, subscripsit Gaius.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

科米尼乌斯兄弟二人依据科尔内利乌斯损害国家尊严法控告了科尔内利乌斯。
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Revised law enacted: 67 BCE

Cornelius’ revised law on exemption from laws

科尔内利乌斯关于豁免法律的修订法

原案与修正后通过的版本必须分开;二百名元老的出席要求和随后人民程序是理解最终措施的关键。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Asconius 58–59 C distinguishes Cornelius’ original proposal from the revised measure adopted: two hundred senators had to be present for a senatorial exemption, followed by reference to the people without obstructive intercession.

LR-cornelia-exemptions-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

67 BCE is the relevant tribunician year. The initial proposal and the revised enactment are successive versions, not evidence for two identically worded operative laws.

LR-cornelia-exemptions-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The measure regulates who can release a person from a law and how Senate and people participate. It concerns legal exemption, rather than general repeal or the cancellation of every law by the Senate.

LR-cornelia-exemptions-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The revised terms survive in Asconius’ historical explanation. His narrative of opposition and compromise is essential to determining which version was actually carried.

LR-cornelia-exemptions-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Displaying only the initial demand for exclusive popular authority would misstate the resulting arrangement. Keep the quorum and later popular step attached to the revised version.

LR-cornelia-exemptions-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Asconius, pp. 58–59 Clark (1907)

Asconius: Latin commentary, Clark 1907

Tum Cornelius ita ferre rursus coepit ne quis in senatu legibus solveretur nisi CC adfuissent, neve quis, cum solutus esset, intercederet, cum de ea re ad populum ferretur. Haec sine tumultu res acta est.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

除非有二百名元老出席,否则元老院不得豁免任何人遵守法律
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Enacted: 104 BCE

Lex Domitia de sacerdotiis

多米提乌斯祭司选任法

多米提乌斯祭司选任法涉及部分部落与祭司团的不同作用;104与103的纪年差异及其解释应保留。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Asconius 79–80 C preserves Cicero’s use of Domitius’ priestly legislation as a precedent. Agrarian Law 2.18 explains the smaller part of the people participating in priestly selection.

LR-domitia-priesthoods-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

The atlas retains the usual 104 BCE date but now records Rotondi’s 103 dating and attempted reconciliation through a tribunician year beginning in December 104. This is a dating disagreement, not a securely documented enactment interval.

LR-domitia-priesthoods-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The measure gives a selected minority of tribes a part in choosing priests, alongside the colleges’ remaining role. Cicero invokes the precedent in Cornelius’ constitutional defence, not as the criminal charge.

LR-domitia-priesthoods-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The law is known through literary testimony and its later repeal or restoration history. Neither a complete voting regulation nor all nomination requirements is preserved in the quoted fragment.

LR-domitia-priesthoods-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Do not say that the entire people directly replaced every form of priestly co-option. The smaller voting body and continued collegial acts matter to the juridical reconstruction.

LR-domitia-priesthoods-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

De Lege Agraria §2.18

Contemporary forensic or political testimony · Cicero, first century BCE; see the speech date in the atlas

An independent Ciceronian explanation complements the Cornelius fragment. Selection by a smaller portion of the people and subsequent co-option are separate acts.

item, inquit, eodemqve modo, capite altero, vt comitiis pontificis maximi. ne hoc quidem vidit, maiores nostros tam fuisse popularis ut, quem per populum creari fas non erat propter religionem sacrorum, in eo tamen propter amplitudinem sacerdoti voluerint populo supplicari. atque hoc idem de ceteris sacerdotiis Cn. Domitius, tribunus plebis, vir clarissimus, tulit, quod populus per religionem sacerdotia mandare non poterat, ut minor pars populi vocaretur; ab ea parte qui esset factus, is a conlegio cooptaretur.

Latin · Complete section printed here; editorial supplements retained

他在另一章又说:“同样地,以选举最高祭司的同一方式。”他连这一点也没有看明白:我们的祖先如此重视人民,虽然由于祭祀的宗教约束,某一职务不得由全体人民选任,却仍因该祭司职位的尊崇,希望候选人向人民求取支持。杰出的保民官格奈乌斯·多米提乌斯,对其余祭司职位也提出同样规定:既然人民因宗教限制不能授予祭司职务,就召集人民中较小的一部分;由这部分人选出者,再由祭司团吸纳为成员。

Source edition ↗

FCO3 · Cicero transmitted by Asconius
Quid? avunculus tuus clarissimus vir, clarissimo patre avo maioribus, credo, silentio, favente nobilitate, nullo intercessore comparato populo Romano dedit et potentissimorum hominum conlegiis eripuit cooptandorum sacerdotum potestatem.

那么,你的舅父呢?那位极显赫的人,父亲、祖父和祖先都极显赫的人:想必他是在一片安静中、在贵族的赞同下、在没有人为他安排否决者的情况下,把选定祭司的权力给予罗马人民,并从那些最有权势之人的祭司团手里夺走的吧!

“想必……吧” retains the irony of credo. The fragment brings religious office into a dispute over political authority. It does not describe an uncontested constitutional reform.

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Enacted: 67 BCE

Lex Gabinia on Pompey’s maritime command

加比尼乌斯授予庞培海上统帅权法

在科尔内利乌斯辩护中,加比尼乌斯法首先是处理否决权的先例;反海盗统帅权与次年的曼尼利乌斯授权不同。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Asconius 71–72 C preserves the Gabinian proposal and the response to Trebellius’ veto in the Cornelius commentary. Cicero’s Manilian speech and Plutarch, Pompey 25–26, give other accounts of the extraordinary command.

LR-gabinia-pirates-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

67 BCE is the tribunate of A. Gabinius and the anti-piracy command. The following year’s Manilian enlargement of Pompey’s responsibilities is a separate enactment.

LR-gabinia-pirates-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

In the Cornelius defence, the important relation is procedural precedent: an obstruction was met with a proposal to remove the obstructing tribune. Powers, geographical extent and resources of the command require their own witnesses.

LR-gabinia-pirates-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The dossier contains literary descriptions and a fragment of Cicero transmitted by Asconius, not the original statute. The threat of removal should not be turned into a completed deposition.

LR-gabinia-pirates-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Different accounts give details of ships, troops and legates. Do not silently harmonize all figures into one verbatim grant, or confuse this law with an earlier Gabinian ballot law.

LR-gabinia-pirates-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

FCO1 · Cicero transmitted by Asconius
Unum tamen quod hoc ipso tr.pl. factum est praetermittendum non videtur. Neque enim maius est legere codicem, cum intercedatur, quam sitellam ipsum coram ipso intercessore deferre, nec gravius incipere ferre quam perferre, nec vehementius ostendere se laturum invito collega quam ipsi collegae magistratum abrogare, nec criminosius tribus ad legem accipiendam quam ad collegam reddendum privatum intro vocare: quae vir fortis, huius collega, A. Gabinius in re optima fecit omnia; neque cum salutem populo Romano atque omnibus gentibus finem diuturnae turpitudinis et servitutis afferret, passus est plus unius collegae sui quam universae civitatis vocem valere et voluntatem.

不过,就在此人担任保民官时发生的一件事,似乎不应略过。在有人行使否决权时宣读法案,难道比亲自在那位否决者面前搬来抽签桶更严重吗?开始提出法案,难道比使它通过更严重吗?表示自己将不顾同僚反对而提出法案,难道比罢免那位同僚的官职更激烈吗?召集各部落前来接受法律,难道比召集他们把自己的同僚变为平民更有罪吗?所有这些事,一位勇敢的人、此人的同僚奥卢斯·加比尼乌斯,都曾为了极好的事业做过。当他给罗马人民带来安全,给所有民族结束长期屈辱和奴役时,他没有容许自己一个同僚的声音和意愿,胜过全体公民的声音和意愿。

The sequence distinguishes reading, introducing, completing, voting, and removing a magistrate. Its comparative force depends on Cicero’s favorable account of Gabinius’ purpose; it is not a neutral catalogue of universally permissible acts. Tr.pl. abbreviates tribuno plebis in the opening construction.

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Traditional dating: 451–450 BCE

Twelve Tables: killing a thief; prohibition of privilegia

十二表法:杀死盗贼与禁止针对个人立法

十二表法的传统创设年、晚共和引用与后世传抄是不同时间层;重建条次及措辞不能视作原表实物。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Milone 9 explicitly invokes the Twelve Tables on killing a nocturnal thief and a daytime thief who defends himself with a weapon. Domo 43 invokes restrictions on privilegia and capital decisions.

LR-twelve-tables-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

451–450 BCE is the traditional date of the decemviral legislation. Cicero’s first-century BCE witness and the much later manuscripts transmitting him are distinct dates in the chain of survival.

LR-twelve-tables-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

In Milo’s defence the rule is an analogy for lawful killing; it does not prove the facts of self-defence on the Appian Way. In Domo the Tables authorize a constitutional objection to legislation against an individual.

LR-twelve-tables-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

No original Twelve Tables survive. Crawford, law 40, separates sources, reconstruction and commentary; even the ordering and numbering of reconstructed clauses can differ from Bruns and other editions.

LR-twelve-tables-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

A later witness may paraphrase rather than quote. Compare Gaius in Digest 9.2.4.1 and Gellius 11.18.6 for the theft rule; their additional conditions must not be silently inserted into Cicero’s words.

LR-twelve-tables-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro T. Annio Milone §9

Cicero: archived Latin

quod si xii tabulae nocturnum furem quoquo modo, diurnum autem, si se telo defenderet, interfici impune voluerunt, quis est qui, quoquo modo quis interfectus sit, puniendum putet, cum videat aliquando gladium nobis ad hominem occidendum ab ipsis porrigi legibus? atqui, si tempus est ullum iure hominis necandi, quae multa sunt, certe illud est non modo iustum verum etiam necessarium, cum vi vis inlata defenditur. pudicitiam cum eriperet militi tribunus militaris in exercitu C. Mari, propinquus eius imperatoris, interfectus ab eo est cui vim adferebat; facere enim probus adulescens periculose quam perpeti turpiter maluit. atque hunc ille summus vir scelere solutum periculo liberavit.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

如果十二表法允许不论何种情形杀死夜间盗贼而不受罚,并允许在白昼盗贼持械自卫时杀死他
Source edition ↗
De Domo Sua Ad Pontifices §43

Cicero: archived Latin

fueris sane tribunus plebis tam iure legeque, quam fuit hic ipse ⟨P. Ser⟩vilius, vir omnibus rebus clarissimus atque amplissimus: quo iure, quo more, quo exemplo legem nominatim de capite civis indemnati tulisti? vetant leges sacratae, vetant xii tabulae leges privatis hominibus inrogari; id est enim privilegium. nemo umquam tulit; nihil est crudelius, nihil perniciosius, nihil quod minus haec civitas ferre possit. proscriptionis miserrimum nomen illud et omnis acerbitas Sullani temporis quid habet quod maxime sit insigne ad memoriam crudelitatis? opinor, poenam in civis Romanos nominatim sine iudicio constitutam.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

十二表法禁止针对个别私人制定法律
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Origin: Sullan settlement; undated

Sulla’s law affecting civic status

苏拉剥夺公民身份的法律

《为凯基纳辩护》提出替代性论证:既质疑剥夺公民权的效力,又讨论即使承认对方前提仍保留的财产能力。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Caecina 95–100 debates a Sullan measure affecting citizenship and the retention of rights involving property and inheritance. The statutory saving clause and Cicero’s constitutional objection are separate arguments.

LR-sullan-citizenship-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

The Sullan settlement supplies the historical setting, conventionally around 81 BCE. Rotondi assigns a citizenship-deprivation law concerning Volaterrae to 81; the current evidence does not recover an official title or exact promulgation event.

LR-sullan-citizenship-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The defence argues both that citizenship cannot simply be taken away and that the relevant private-law capacity remains protected even on the opponent’s premise. These are alternative routes to standing or entitlement, not a single straightforward concession.

LR-sullan-citizenship-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

A forensic report of a law and its interpretation survives; no original municipal status decree is reproduced. The modern descriptive title must remain visibly supplied.

LR-sullan-citizenship-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Do not treat Cicero’s general proposition as an uncontested description of every historical deprivation of citizenship. The Sullan punitive settlement and legal capacity of particular communities need separate proof.

LR-sullan-citizenship-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro A. Caecina §95

Cicero: archived Latin

sunt in eam rem testimonia. postea cur tu, Aebuti, de isto potius fundo quam de alio, si quem habes, Caecinae denuntiabas, si Caecina non possidebat? ipse porro Caecina cur se moribus deduci volebat idque tibi de amicorum et de Aquili sententia responderat. at enim Sulla legem tulit. Vt nihil de illo tempore, nihil de calamitate rei publicae querar, hoc tibi respondeo, ascripsisse eundem Sullam in eadem lege: si qvid ivs non esset rogarier, eivs ea lege nihilvm rogatvm. quid est quod ius non sit, quod populus iubere aut vetare non possit? Vt ne longius abeam, declarat ista ascriptio esse aliquid; nam, nisi esset, hoc in omnibus legibus non ascriberetur.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

如果有任何事项依法不得提请表决,则本法对该事项视为未作提案。
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

edict · Edict issued: during 62–61 BCE

Flaccus’ provincial edict prohibiting gold export

弗拉库斯禁止从亚细亚输出黄金的告示

弗拉库斯禁运黄金的告示、元老院先例与扣押款项的实际去向须分别证明;辩词中的敌意不能当作关于犹太人的事实判断。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Flacco 67 expressly reports Flaccus’ edict forbidding export of gold from Asia and appeals to earlier senatorial policy. The surrounding passages concern money collected for Jerusalem and its handling.

LR-flaccus-gold-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

The edict belongs to Flaccus’ Asian administration, conventionally 62–61 BCE; the defence of 59 is later testimony. A precise issue day and complete duration are not established.

LR-flaccus-gold-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The legal question includes the governor’s competence to prohibit export and whether the seized money was properly accounted for. Justifying an export restriction does not prove that every seizure or subsequent disposition was lawful.

LR-flaccus-gold-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The edict and senatorial precedents are reported by the advocate; no independent posted edict or full accounts survive in this dossier.

LR-flaccus-gold-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Cicero’s hostile characterization of Jewish participants is rhetoric, not evidence that they lacked rights or that their accusations were false. Keep the claimed public policy distinct from alleged private appropriation.

LR-flaccus-gold-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro L. Flacco §67

Cicero: archived Latin

Cum aurum Iudaeorum nomine quotannis ex Italia et ex omnibus nostris provinciis Hierosolymam exportari soleret, Flaccus sanxit edicto ne ex Asia exportari liceret. quis est, iudices, qui hoc non vere laudare possit? exportari aurum non oportere cum saepe antea senatus tum me consule gravissime iudicavit. huic autem barbarae superstitioni resistere severitatis, multitudinem Iudaeorum flagrantem non numquam in contionibus pro re publica contemnere gravitatis summae fuit. at Cn. Pompeius captis Hierosolymis victor ex illo fano nihil attigit.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

弗拉库斯以告示规定,不得将黄金从亚细亚输出。
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 86 BCE

Lex Valeria on debt adjustment

瓦莱里乌斯债务调整法

86年的瓦莱里亚债务调整与授权苏拉的同姓法律不同;残篇、后世史家概述与推测中的废止必须分开。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Fonteio’s opening fragments refer to the accounting effects of the debt adjustment. Velleius 2.23.2 explicitly says that Valerius Flaccus ordered creditors to receive a quarter.

LR-valeria-debt-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

86 BCE is the suffect consulship associated with the law. The later Fonteius prosecution discusses earlier public accounting; it does not date the measure to the trial.

LR-valeria-debt-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The adjustment remits three quarters of the relevant debt burden in the historical account. The forensic issue is whether Fonteius’ treasury or accounting conduct can be impugned from records produced under this exceptional adjustment.

LR-valeria-debt-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The speech survives imperfectly at its beginning. A later historian supplies an explicit summary of the fraction; do not fill the missing forensic text with an invented statute.

LR-valeria-debt-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Rotondi notes that cessation of operation does not itself prove formal repeal by another Cornelian law. This Valerian debt measure is distinct from the Valerian authorization of Sulla.

LR-valeria-debt-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro M. Fonteio §1

Cicero: archived Latin

[LACUNA] ⟨o⟩portuisse an ita dissolvit ut omnes alii dissolverunt? nam ita ego defendo M. Fonteium, iudices, itaque contendo post legem Valeriam latam [LACUNA] te [LACUNA] quaestore usque ad T. Crispinum quaestorem aliter neminem solvisse; hunc omnium superiorum, huius autem omnis qui postea fuerint auctoritatem dico secutos.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

在瓦莱里乌斯法颁布之后
Source edition ↗
Pro M. Fonteio §2

Cicero: archived Latin

quid accusas, quid reprendis? nam quod in tabulis dodrantariis et quadrantariis, quas ait ab Hirtuleio institutas, Fontei officium desiderat, non possum existimare utrum ipse erret an vos in errorem inducere velit. quaero enim abs te, M. Plaetori, possitne tibi ipsi probata esse nostra causa, si, qua in re abs te M. Fonteius accusatur, auctorem habet eum quem tu maxime laudas Hirtuleium; qua in re autem laudas Hirtuleium, Fonteius idem fecisse reperitur. reprehendis solutionis genus; eodem modo Hirtuleium dissolvisse publicae tabulae coarguunt. laudas illum quod dodrantarias tabulas instituerit; easdem Fonteius instituit et eodem genere pecuniae. nam ne forte sis nescius et istas tabulas existimes ⟨a⟩d ⟨diversam v⟩e⟨te⟩ris aeris alieni rationem pertinere, ob unam causam et in uno genere sunt institutae. nam cum publicanis qui Africam, qui Aquileiense por⟨torium⟩ [LACUNA]

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

在记录四分之三与四分之一数额的账簿中
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 81 BCE

Lex Cornelia testamentaria / nummaria (de falsis)

科尔内利乌斯遗嘱与货币伪造法

《科尔内利乌斯伪造法》在此是说明法律不溯及既往的比较;帝政法学扩充的伪造罪范围不能全部回填至81年。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Verrines II.1.108 cites the testamentary and monetary Cornelian law as an example of a statute operating prospectively. Later Digest 48.10 preserves a developed law of falsum.

LR-cornelia-falsis-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

81 BCE is the conventional Sullan enactment date. Verres’ urban edict in 74 and the published accusation in 70 are later contexts of comparison.

LR-cornelia-falsis-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

Cicero’s immediate point is temporal application, illustrated by forgery-related legislation. The statute is not the charge under which Verres is prosecuted, and the passage does not establish that Asellus forged a will.

LR-cornelia-falsis-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Later juristic collections assemble many extensions beyond wills and coins. Crawford expressly declined to reconstruct this law as a text in Roman Statutes, contrasting its evidential position with the already conjectural Aquilian reconstruction.

LR-cornelia-falsis-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Do not back-project imperial extensions or penalties into the law of 81. Its traditional multiple descriptive names do not supply a surviving official title page.

LR-cornelia-falsis-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

In C. Verrem §2.1.108

Cicero: archived Latin

in lege Voconia non est fecit fecerit, neque in ulla praeteritum tempus reprehenditur nisi eius rei quae sua sponte tam scelerata et nefaria est ut, etiamsi lex non esset, magnopere vitanda fuerit. atque in his ipsis rebus multa videmus ita sancta esse legibus ut ante facta in iudicium non vocentur; Cornelia testamentaria, nummaria, ceterae complures, in quibus non ius aliquod novum populo constituitur, sed sancitur ut, quod semper malum facinus fuerit, eius quaestio ad populum pertineat ex certo tempore.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

关于遗嘱与货币的科尔内利乌斯法
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Enacted: 70 BCE

Lex Aurelia iudiciaria

奥雷利乌斯审判员法

奥雷利乌斯法确立三类审判员的框架;审理韦雷斯的既有审判团与当时改革提案不可混同,财产资格仍有解释问题。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Asconius 17 C explicitly credits the praetor L. Aurelius Cotta with distributing jury service among senators, equites and tribuni aerarii. Verrines II.2.174 describes the contemporary proposal for new jurors.

LR-aurelia-iudiciaria-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

70 BCE is fixed by Cotta’s praetorship and the prosecution of Verres. The existing Verres jury must not be redrawn as already constituted under the three-order arrangement merely because reform was being debated.

LR-aurelia-iudiciaria-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The reform ends exclusive senatorial control of the relevant public juries and establishes participation from three groups. Their social and census qualifications need to be distinguished from actual panel selection in a particular trial.

LR-aurelia-iudiciaria-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Asconius is more specific than abbreviated accounts in Livy’s epitome or Velleius that describe a transfer to equites or a division between two orders. Preserve that difference rather than counting the summaries as identical wording.

LR-aurelia-iudiciaria-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Lewis discusses the uncertain identity of tribuni aerarii and their property qualification. The law’s existence and broad redistribution are firmer than every modern reconstruction of its social categories.

LR-aurelia-iudiciaria-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Asconius, In Pisonem, p. 17 Clark (1907)

Asconius: Latin commentary, Clark 1907

Legem iudiciariam ante aliquot annos quibus temporibus accusatus est Verres a Cicerone tulit L. Aurelius Cotta praetor, qua communicata sunt iudicia senatui et equitibus Romanis et tribunis aerariis.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

依该法,审判职能由元老、罗马骑士和财务保民官共同承担。
Source edition ↗
Asconius, In Pisonianam, 17 C (comment on Piso 94)

Later ancient testimony · Asconius, first century CE; Clark edition 1907

Asconius expressly dates the proposal by Pompey’s second consulship. His wording does not specify a newly increased census amount. Translation leaves the compressed ex censu / ex centuriis syntax visible.

Legem iudiciariam ante aliquot annos quibus temporibus accusatus est Verres a Cicerone tulit L. Aurelius Cotta praetor, qua communicata sunt iudicia senatui et equitibus Romanis et tribunis aerariis. Rursus deinde Pompeius in consulatu secundo, quo haec oratio dicta est, promulgavit ut amplissimo ex censu ex centuriis aliter atque antea lecti iudices, aeque tamen ex illis tribus ordinibus, res iudicarent.

Latin · Entire bounded excerpt printed here

此前若干年,即西塞罗控告韦雷斯的时期,裁判官卢基乌斯·奥雷利乌斯·科塔提出一部审判员法,将审判事务分配给元老、罗马骑士和国库保民官。后来,庞培在第二次执政官任内(本篇演说正是在那时发表的)公布一项提案:审判员应以不同于以往的方式,从最高财产等级、从百人队中选出,但仍同样来自上述三个阶层,由他们审理案件。

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

lex · Promulgation attested: 55 BCE

Lex Pompeia iudiciaria

庞培审判员选任法

55年的庞培审判员法保留三阶层结构;阿斯科尼乌斯不能证明庞培提高了财产门槛,更不能据此虚构一个新数额。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Asconius 17 C expressly says Pompey promulgated the measure in his second consulship and retained selection from the three orders. Pisonem 94 is the contemporary passage being explained; Philippic 1.20 later names the Pompeian law.

LR-pompeia-iudiciaria-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

55 BCE is independently anchored by the second consulship and Asconius’ dating of In Pisonem. The verb promulgavit attests public proposal; Cicero’s lege iudiciaria lata and later reference provide the wider enactment context. No exact voting day is established.

LR-pompeia-iudiciaria-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The rule concerns selection from the highest assessed property category and centuries in a manner different from before. It retains the three-order framework rather than creating a new exclusive senatorial or equestrian jury.

LR-pompeia-iudiciaria-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The original statute is not extant. Rotondi records an unproved attempt to identify Florentine jury fragments with it; those fragments must not be presented as a secure physical copy of this law.

LR-pompeia-iudiciaria-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Lewis, pp. 213–214, explicitly rejects treating Asconius as proof that Pompey raised the census threshold. Enforcement of existing qualification and limits on discretionary selection are alternatives. “Highest census” does not supply a new numerical threshold.

LR-pompeia-iudiciaria-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Asconius, In Pisonem, p. 17 Clark (1907)

Asconius: Latin commentary, Clark 1907

Rursus deinde Pompeius in consulatu secundo, quo haec oratio dicta est, promulgavit ut amplissimo ex censu ex centuriis aliter atque antea lecti iudices, aeque tamen ex illis tribus ordinibus, res iudicarent.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

但仍然平等地从那三个等级中选取
Source edition ↗
In L. Calpurnium Pisonem §94

Contemporary forensic or political testimony · Cicero, first century BCE; see the speech date in the atlas

Read with Asconius 17 C. This is evidence for Cicero’s presentation of the reform and a threat of future prosecution, not a surviving schedule of property thresholds.

quae cum ita sint—non enim dubito quin, cum haec quae excellunt me nosse videas, non existimes mediam illam partem et turbam flagitiorum tuorum mihi esse inauditam— nihil est quod me hortere, nihil est quod invites; admoneri me satis est. admonebit autem nemo alius nisi rei publicae tempus, quod mihi quidem magis videtur quam tu umquam arbitratus es appropinquare. ecquid vides, ecquid sentis, lege iudiciaria lata, quos posthac iudices simus habituri? neque legetur quisquis voluerit, nec quisquis noluerit non legetur; nulli conicientur in illum ordinem, nulli eximentur; non ambitio ad gratiam, non iniquitas ad aemulationem conitetur; iudices iudicabunt ei quos lex ipsa, non quos hominum libido delegerit. quod cum ita sit, mihi crede, neminem invitum invitabis; res ipsa et rei publicae tempus aut me ipsum, quod nolim, aut alium quempiam aut invitabit aut dehortabitur.

Latin · Complete section printed here; editorial supplements retained

既然如此(因为你看见我知道那些显著的罪行,我相信你不会以为你那一大堆其余恶行我竟全未听闻)你便不必催促我,也不必邀我行动;给我一个提醒就够了。但提醒我的不会是别人,而是国家的时局;在我看来,那个时机比你曾经想象的更近。你可看见、可明白,在审判员法通过之后,我们往后将有怎样的审判员?不是谁想入选就能入选,也不是谁不想入选就可以不入选;不会有人被硬塞进那个行列,也不会有人被抽出;营求不会为徇私而用力,不公不会为嫉恨而推动。执掌审判的,将是法律本身所选择的人,而不是个人好恶所选择的人。既然如此,相信我,你不会把一个不愿行动的人邀来;事情本身和国家的时局,自会促使或劝止我本人(我并不愿走到这一步)或者另外某个人。

Source edition ↗

Asconius, In Pisonianam, 17 C (comment on Piso 94)

Later ancient testimony · Asconius, first century CE; Clark edition 1907

Asconius expressly dates the proposal by Pompey’s second consulship. His wording does not specify a newly increased census amount. Translation leaves the compressed ex censu / ex centuriis syntax visible.

Legem iudiciariam ante aliquot annos quibus temporibus accusatus est Verres a Cicerone tulit L. Aurelius Cotta praetor, qua communicata sunt iudicia senatui et equitibus Romanis et tribunis aerariis. Rursus deinde Pompeius in consulatu secundo, quo haec oratio dicta est, promulgavit ut amplissimo ex censu ex centuriis aliter atque antea lecti iudices, aeque tamen ex illis tribus ordinibus, res iudicarent.

Latin · Entire bounded excerpt printed here

此前若干年,即西塞罗控告韦雷斯的时期,裁判官卢基乌斯·奥雷利乌斯·科塔提出一部审判员法,将审判事务分配给元老、罗马骑士和国库保民官。后来,庞培在第二次执政官任内(本篇演说正是在那时发表的)公布一项提案:审判员应以不同于以往的方式,从最高财产等级、从百人队中选出,但仍同样来自上述三个阶层,由他们审理案件。

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

plebiscitum · Measure proposed: 58 BCE

Lex Clodia concerning citizens executed without judgment

克洛狄乌斯关于未经审判处死公民的决议

58年的一般性克洛狄乌斯措施与随后针对西塞罗个人的措施须分开;一般条文并不自行解决63年紧急授权的合法性。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Dio 38.14.4 describes Clodius’ general measure against putting a citizen to death without trial. Velleius 2.45.1 likewise reports the rule’s general form and its practical direction against Cicero.

LR-clodia-capite-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

58 BCE is the tribunician setting. Dio’s account of proposal and the later named measure should be kept in sequence; an exact promulgation or voting day is not secured here.

LR-clodia-capite-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The legal trigger is alleged killing of a citizen without trial, with interdiction as the reported sanction. The political target is Cicero’s handling of the Catilinarians in 63, but the initial form did not simply name him.

LR-clodia-capite-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

The rule is mediated by later historical accounts and retrospective Ciceronian defence. No original plebiscite is reproduced. It is separate from both Gracchus’ earlier safeguard and the later named Clodian exile measure.

LR-clodia-capite-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

The general wording does not itself decide the controversy about the Senate’s emergency authorization in 63. That is the contested legal and political background.

LR-clodia-capite-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Cassius Dio, Roman History 38.14.4–6; English translation E. Cary (1914), pp. 226–229

Later ancient testimony · Dio, early third century CE; E. Cary translation 1914

This is Cary’s public-domain English rendering of Dio, not a Latin law or a new Greek transcription. Chinese is translated from this English witness. Dio’s account of senatorial authorization is a later historical interpretation, not a resolution of the constitutional dispute.

Now the law that Clodius next proposed was not on its face enacted against Cicero, since it did not contain his name, but was directed against all, without exception, who should put to death or even had put to death any citizens without the condemnation of the people; yet in reality it was drawn up with especial reference to the orator. 5 It brought within its scope, indeed, the entire senate, because that body had charged the consuls with the protection of the city, by which act it was permitted them to take such steps, and afterwards had condemned Lentulus and the others who were put to death at that time. 6 Nevertheless, Cicero received the whole blame, or at least the greater part of it, since he had laid information against the men and had on each occasion made the motion and put the vote and finally had exacted the penalty of them through those entrusted with such business.

English translation of Greek · Entire bounded excerpt printed here

克洛狄乌斯接着提出的法律,表面上并不是针对西塞罗制定的,因为其中没有他的名字;它针对的是所有未经人民判决而处死、甚至已经处死任何公民的人,无一例外。然而实际上,该法特别针对这位演说家而拟定。[5]它的范围其实也包括整个元老院,因为该院曾责成执政官保护城市,由此准许他们采取此类措施,后来又判处伦图卢斯以及当时遭处死的其他人。[6]尽管如此,西塞罗仍承担了全部或至少大部分的责难,因为他曾揭发这些人,每一次又都提出动议、交付表决,最后还通过受命办理此事的人对他们执行了刑罚。

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

decree · Order issued: before the hearing of 81 BCE

Dolabella’s decree requiring a sponsio

多拉贝拉命令订立诉讼赌约的裁判命令

多拉贝拉的命令是本案程序决定,并非另一部告示;“新奇”是辩方评价,不能自动等同于无效。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Quinctio 30 reports Dolabella’s order requiring Quinctius to make a sponsio with Naevius on whether the property had been possessed for thirty days under Burrienus’ edict.

LR-dolabella-sponsio-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

The order precedes the hearing of 81 BCE. It belongs to the sequence of this dispute, not the initial creation of the edict or a general act of legislation.

LR-dolabella-sponsio-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The order makes the lawfulness of the edictal possession a preliminary issue with consequences for security and reputation. Quinctius’ advisers object to exposing his standing through this formulation and ask for a more symmetrical arrangement.

LR-dolabella-sponsio-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

Only Cicero’s report of the decree and reaction is available. This is an individual procedural decision, not a second general praetorian edict.

LR-dolabella-sponsio-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Cicero calls it novel and criticizes it, but that characterization does not independently establish nullity. Keep the order’s existence, the advocate’s objection and Greenidge’s reconstruction distinct.

LR-dolabella-sponsio-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro P. Quinctio §30

Cicero: archived Latin

venit Romam Quinctius, vadimonium sistit. iste, homo acerrimus, bonorum possessor, expulsor, ereptor, annum et sex mensis nihil petit, quiescit, condicionibus hunc quoad potest producit, a Cn. Dolabella denique praetore postulat ut sibi Quinctius iudicatum solvi satis det ex formula: quod ab eo petat quoivs ex edicto praetoris bona dies xxx possessa sint. non recusabat Quinctius quin ita satis dare iuberetur, si bona possessa essent ex edicto. decernit— quam aequum, nihil dico, unum hoc dico, novum; et hoc ipsum tacuisse mallem, quoniam utrumque quivis intellegere potuit—sed iubet P. Quinctium sponsionem cum Sex. Naevio facere: si bona sua ex edicto P. Burrieni praetoris dies xxx possessa non essent. recusabant qui aderant tum Quinctio, demonstrabant de re iudicium fieri oportere ut aut uterque inter se aut neuter satis daret; non necesse esse famam alterius in iudicium venire.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

但他命令普布利乌斯·昆克提乌斯与塞克斯图斯·奈维乌斯订立诉讼赌约:
Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

senatusconsultum · Resolution adopted: 63 BCE

Senatus consultum interpreting the lex Calpurnia

元老院解释卡尔普尔尼乌斯选举舞弊法的决议

元老院决议把若干行为定性为违法,但附有“若确有其事”的条件;规范判断与穆雷纳实际行为的证明不能混为一谈。

Ancient attestation / identification

Existence & identification

Murena 67 reports the Senate’s resolution on Cicero’s motion and lists paid attendance, paid following, tribe-wide seating and indiscriminate meals as conduct contrary to the Calpurnian law if done.

LR-senate-ambitus-existence

Chronological reconstruction; qualifications retained

Dating argument

63 BCE is the year of Cicero’s consulship and the Murena defence. The underlying Calpurnian statute dates to 67; the interpretive resolution is a later instrument.

LR-senate-ambitus-dating

Interpretation of ancient testimony

Legal & procedural operation

The conditional “if these things were done” separates legal characterization from factual proof. Cicero can endorse the Senate’s rule while arguing that Murena’s activities do not meet it.

LR-senate-ambitus-operation

Transmission / documentary control

Text & documentary survival

A senatorial decision is embedded in a forensic account rather than preserved as an independently inscribed senatus consultum. The speech is nevertheless explicit about its nature and Cicero’s role.

LR-senate-ambitus-transmission

Uncertainty / competing reconstruction

Disputes & limits

Do not label the resolution a new popular lex or read the enumeration as a factual finding of guilt against Murena. The distinction is the defence’s central procedural move.

LR-senate-ambitus-debate

Ancient evidence · 古代见证

Open each passage. The earlier cards translate only the marked focus; new cards identify their full translation scope.

Pro L. Murena §67

Cicero: archived Latin

qua re, ut ad id quod institui revertar, tolle mihi e causa nomen Catonis, remove vim, praetermitte auctoritatem quae in iudiciis aut nihil valere aut ad salutem debet valere, congredere mecum criminibus ipsis. quid accusas, Cato, quid adfers ad iudicium, quid arguis? ambitum accusas; non defendo. me reprehendis, quod idem defendam quod lege punierim. punivi ambitum, non innocentiam; ambitum vero ipsum vel tecum accusabo, si voles. dixisti senatus consultum me referente esse factum, si mercede obviam candidatis issent, si conducti sectarentur, si gladiatoribus volgo locus tributim et item prandia si volgo essent data, contra legem Calpurniam factum videri. ergo ita senatus iudicat, contra legem facta haec videri, si facta sint; decernit quod nihil opus est, dum candidatis morem gerit. nam factum sit necne vehementer quaeritur; sin factum sit, quin contra legem sit dubitare nemo potest.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

你说过,元老院曾依我的提议作出一项决议
Source edition ↗
Pro L. Murena §67

Cicero: archived Latin

qua re, ut ad id quod institui revertar, tolle mihi e causa nomen Catonis, remove vim, praetermitte auctoritatem quae in iudiciis aut nihil valere aut ad salutem debet valere, congredere mecum criminibus ipsis. quid accusas, Cato, quid adfers ad iudicium, quid arguis? ambitum accusas; non defendo. me reprehendis, quod idem defendam quod lege punierim. punivi ambitum, non innocentiam; ambitum vero ipsum vel tecum accusabo, si voles. dixisti senatus consultum me referente esse factum, si mercede obviam candidatis issent, si conducti sectarentur, si gladiatoribus volgo locus tributim et item prandia si volgo essent data, contra legem Calpurniam factum videri. ergo ita senatus iudicat, contra legem facta haec videri, si facta sint; decernit quod nihil opus est, dum candidatis morem gerit. nam factum sit necne vehementer quaeritur; sin factum sit, quin contra legem sit dubitare nemo potest.

Chinese translation of the marked focus only

这些行为如果确曾发生,就应视为违反法律
Source edition ↗
Pro L. Murena §67

Contemporary forensic or political testimony · Cicero, first century BCE; see the speech date in the atlas

The conditional formulation is essential: the Senate classifies conduct; the trial must still establish whether the conduct occurred.

qua re, ut ad id quod institui revertar, tolle mihi e causa nomen Catonis, remove vim, praetermitte auctoritatem quae in iudiciis aut nihil valere aut ad salutem debet valere, congredere mecum criminibus ipsis. quid accusas, Cato, quid adfers ad iudicium, quid arguis? ambitum accusas; non defendo. me reprehendis, quod idem defendam quod lege punierim. punivi ambitum, non innocentiam; ambitum vero ipsum vel tecum accusabo, si voles. dixisti senatus consultum me referente esse factum, si mercede obviam candidatis issent, si conducti sectarentur, si gladiatoribus volgo locus tributim et item prandia si volgo essent data, contra legem Calpurniam factum videri. ergo ita senatus iudicat, contra legem facta haec videri, si facta sint; decernit quod nihil opus est, dum candidatis morem gerit. nam factum sit necne vehementer quaeritur; sin factum sit, quin contra legem sit dubitare nemo potest.

Latin · Complete section printed here; editorial supplements retained

因此,回到我原先的论点:请把卡托这个名字从案子中拿开,排除他的影响,暂且不论他的威望(威望在审判中应当毫无作用,或者只应有助于保全被告)请以指控本身同我交锋。卡托,你控告什么?向法庭提出什么?指证什么?你控告选举贿赂;我并不为贿赂辩护。你责备我为自己曾以法律惩罚的事情辩护。我惩罚的是贿赂,不是无辜;你若愿意,我还会同你一起控告贿赂本身。你说元老院依我的提议作出决议:若有人受雇出迎候选人,若有人受雇随行,若角斗表演的座位按部落向众人分配,或向众人普遍提供宴餐,这些行为应视为违反《卡尔普尔尼亚法》。所以元老院判断的是:这些行为如果发生,就应视为违法;它作出一项本无必要的规定,同时顾及候选人的意愿。因为真正受到激烈追问的是事情是否发生;如果确已发生,任何人都不能怀疑其违法。

Source edition ↗

Documentation & critical reading

Inspect relationships in the atlas →

Consulted editions & source controls

A. H. J. Greenidge, The Legal Procedure of Cicero’s Time (1901)

Public-domain scholarship; older reconstruction

On-disk PDF inspected; printed pages cited

Published source / reading guide ↗
On-disk source and fingerprint

A. H. J. Greenidge, The Legal Procedure of Cicero’s Time (1901)

SHA-256 114c987074f147c6d70b0eec4f90715b946788c8e9ff3d86891c7f4059f6e516

PDF page numbers are one-based positions in this specific file. Printed page locators remain authoritative.

Giovanni Rotondi, Leges publicae populi Romani (1912)

Public-domain scholarship; older chronology and identifications

On-disk PDF inspected; printed pages cited

On-disk source and fingerprint

Giovanni Rotondi, Leges publicae populi Romani (1912)

SHA-256 9103a4915b615563a325127b4f1d8a75e10154289c0bc6360e4a988eafa1d321

PDF page numbers are one-based positions in this specific file. Printed page locators remain authoritative.

M. H. Crawford (ed.), Roman Statutes, vol. I (1996)

Modern critical edition; full PDF not redistributed

On-disk PDF inspected; printed pages cited

On-disk source and fingerprint

M. H. Crawford (ed.), Roman Statutes, vol. I (1996)

SHA-256 2d6658dd1155ecfffacb165cf7924d5f8b8327d67a0d2d5e2f77c8b2bc8ed812

PDF page numbers are one-based positions in this specific file. Printed page locators remain authoritative.

M. H. Crawford (ed.), Roman Statutes, vol. II (1996)

Modern critical edition; full PDF not redistributed

On-disk PDF inspected; printed pages cited

On-disk source and fingerprint

M. H. Crawford (ed.), Roman Statutes, vol. II (1996)

SHA-256 e0378ad10ae332d19541aaa1a779d60691fb7b524aa179c13259838b52d84ec5

PDF page numbers are one-based positions in this specific file. Printed page locators remain authoritative.

R. G. Lewis, Asconius: Commentaries on Speeches of Cicero (2006)

Modern translation and commentary; full PDF not redistributed

On-disk PDF inspected; printed pages cited

On-disk source and fingerprint

R. G. Lewis, Asconius: Commentaries on Speeches of Cicero (2006)

SHA-256 d2d0249e9fda696fe9236f8b6e89cbfee8956580012ab33957f1aa656b52e895

PDF page numbers are one-based positions in this specific file. Printed page locators remain authoritative.

Julien Dubouloz, “La juridiction du gouverneur provincial. Réflexions sur les Verrines comme sources pour l’histoire du droit”, in J. R. W. Prag (ed.), Sicilia nutrix plebis Romanae (2007)

Modern historical analysis; publisher volume consulted on disk; author PDF retrieved but has no usable text layer

On-disk PDF inspected; printed pages cited

Published source / reading guide ↗
On-disk source and fingerprint

Julien Dubouloz, “La juridiction du gouverneur provincial. Réflexions sur les Verrines comme sources pour l’histoire du droit”, in J. R. W. Prag (ed.), Sicilia nutrix plebis Romanae (2007)

SHA-256 3bec796ceedfac2915175f3e6e3099bf910c3aee84379e45b14ae968ca891495

PDF page numbers are one-based positions in this specific file. Printed page locators remain authoritative.

Malcolm Bell III, “Apronius in the Agora: Sicilian Civil Architecture and the Lex Hieronica”, in J. R. W. Prag (ed.), Sicilia nutrix plebis Romanae (2007)

Modern archaeological interpretation; consulted opening discussion pp. 117–120

On-disk PDF inspected; printed pages cited

On-disk source and fingerprint

Julien Dubouloz, “La juridiction du gouverneur provincial. Réflexions sur les Verrines comme sources pour l’histoire du droit”, in J. R. W. Prag (ed.), Sicilia nutrix plebis Romanae (2007)

SHA-256 3bec796ceedfac2915175f3e6e3099bf910c3aee84379e45b14ae968ca891495

PDF page numbers are one-based positions in this specific file. Printed page locators remain authoritative.

LEPOR, notice 3: Loi Acilia de repetundis

Current critical catalogue; ancient texts and scholarly commentary distinguished

Online text/search-cache inspected 2026-09-10; direct server may return HTTP 403

Published source / reading guide ↗

LEPOR, notice 682: Loi Sempronia (plutôt qu’Acilia) de repetundis

Current critical catalogue; ancient texts and scholarly commentary distinguished

Online text/search-cache inspected 2026-09-10; direct server may return HTTP 403

Published source / reading guide ↗

LEPOR, notice 717: Loi Tullia Antonia de ambitu

Current critical catalogue; ancient texts and scholarly commentary distinguished

Online text/search-cache inspected 2026-09-10; direct server may return HTTP 403

Published source / reading guide ↗

LEPOR, notice 757: Loi Voconia

Current critical catalogue; ancient texts and scholarly commentary distinguished

Online text/search-cache inspected 2026-09-10; direct server may return HTTP 403

Published source / reading guide ↗

Perseus XML files and Asconius supply the main ancient texts. Local modern PDFs are bibliographically documented, not redistributed. A source’s survival, an author’s report, and historical truth are separate questions. Latin-derived adaptations and working translations retain CC BY-SA 4.0 attribution; consult the edition manifest. The current source comparison and retrieval limits are recorded in the research source register.