This is an AI-assisted specialist-role panel, not human peer review.
| Role | Question controlled | Reconciled decision |
|---|---|---|
| Homeric philologist/textual critic | Does the cited Greek exist at the stated locus? | Use only the pinned Murray/Perseus TEI; preserve its anomaly ledger and raw identifiers. |
| Homeric narratologist | Is the relation event-specific or only contextual? | A scene anchor cannot promote unrelated dialogue; use A/B/C/D and typed N/U outcomes. |
| Screenplay/adaptation scholar | What transformation is performed? | Record compression, expansion, composite, relocation, speaker reassignment, inversion, and contradiction separately. |
| Reception/mythography specialist | Is material Odyssey-specific? | Trojan-cycle or modern Bronze-Age material without a 24-book locus is N2 even if broadly mythological. |
| Digital-humanities/provenance editor | Can every claim be rebuilt? | Hash-pin both primary sources; retain physical locators, OCR confidence, rules, exact targets, and generated contexts. |
| Adversarial reviewer | Are negative claims or citations overstated? | Phrase negatives as bounded search results; segregate 40 U lines and all mixed departures. |
Reconciliation rule: a positive survives only if it has a screenplay locator, a declared strength/basis/transformation, and one or more resolvable Greek loci. A negative survives only as N1/N2 with the bounded wording. Disagreements are resolved downward in strength, never upward by thematic enthusiasm.